‘We’re going to lose islands … whole countries,’ says Pacific climate advocate

Victoria University's Dr Pala Molisa ... challenging ideas on how accountancy norms undermine social justice. Image: Victoria University

By Thomas Leaycraft of Scoop

New Zealand needs to acknowledge that Pacific Island nations face an “ecological holocaust” and “ecocide” thanks to climate change, says Dr Pala Molisa.

Molisa, a lecturer in accounting at Victoria University, will be leading the open forum at the In the Eye of the Storm Pacific climate change conference, which started today. Dr Molisa is also the MC of the conference.

“One of the reasons we call this … conference In the Eye of the Storm,” Molisa says, “is that the Pacific is one of the places where the impacts of climate change will be most severely felt and first felt.

“We’re going to lose islands – we’re going to lose whole countries – because of rising sea levels … The Pacific is one of the most vulnerable areas to these super storms and extreme weather events.”

In the eye of The Storm logoThe conference, which runs from today until Wednesday this week, will provide an unconventional look at climate change.

“It’s bringing amazing leaders and frontline activists from throughout the Pacific together,” says Molisa. The conference will discuss not only the immediate causes and effects of climate change but also the systemic issues behind it.

Though a lecturer in accounting, Molisa enlivens a traditionally “dry” field by “following the numbers” within social and economic frameworks, and looks at climate change through the lens of “the economic system powering it”.

‘Unrelated issues’
Most people view climate change and poverty as completely unrelated issues, but Molisa sees them both as the byproducts of a broken system.

“We can’t treat climate change as this standalone issue that’s separate from the mass extinction that’s going on in the oceans, that’s separate from deepening inequality.”

These things all directly result from “this economic system which is at the same time powering catastrophic climate change”.

He points to the recently signed Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) as an example of these systemic flaws, arguing that its provisions – such as those that allow companies to sue government over laws that damage their profits – could make it difficult to impose environmental regulations that are in the public’s interest.

The TPPA, he says, “undermines our ability to respond effectively to these climate crises”.

Molisa is dissatisfied with the current volume and intensity of the national climate change discussion.

“Our language isn’t up to the task,” he says. “This is a life and death issue, and yet the language of most politicians and public policy-makers is not life and death, it’s wait and see, incremental change, and it’s [using] very sanitised language.”

Radical language
Molisa believes the lexicon for mainstream discussion has been stripped of the appropriate radical language. Words like “ecological holocaust”, “ecocide” and “biocide” should be part of society’s working vocabulary.

“Actions are predicated on our understanding of reality, so language is fundamental,” he says. “It rained in December in the Arctic – you know, rain! That should be world news! … What’s the thing before you have a WTF moment? This is a crisis!”

The conference takes place against a backdrop of international efforts to reduce carbon emissions, most recently the COP 21 Paris Climate Conference, where much of the international community pledged to reduce their carbon emissions in an attempt to limit global warming to a further 1.5 degrees.

Molisa applauds these recent efforts but still finds them “woefully inadequate”, noting that experts project that a catastrophic 2.7-3.5 degree rise could still occur even if all the current pledges are met.

“It’s a start, but it’s only aspirational,” he warns. “We are pushing ahead at our current trajectory at breakneck speed.” Drastic action is needed before climate change reaches “runaway” levels – if indeed it hasn’t already, he says.

The In the Eye of the Storm conference will look not only at the problems but also the solutions. While Pacific Island nations wield relatively little sway, they are not powerless in the international climate change discussion.

As well as continuing to fight for tougher international standards – and, indeed, their survival – at international summits, the people of the Pacific, Molisa says, must be “the moral voices at the forefront of climate discussions around the world”.

Thomas Leaycraft is a Scoop student journalist intern covering the In the Eye of the Storm conference for Scoop, Asia Pacific Report and Evening Report.

Read more about the In the Eye of the Storm Pacific Climate Conference
To read more from Dr Molisa, visit his blog at blackstone.net.nz

Print Friendly


Comments are closed.