<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opinion &#8211; Asia Pacific Report</title>
	<atom:link href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/category/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz</link>
	<description>Independent Asia Pacific news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Pezeshkian speaks from the heart, but with legal, moral and strategic clarity</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/24/pezeshkian-speaks-from-the-heart-but-with-legal-moral-and-strategic-clarity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC arrest warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international criminal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[killing of children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masoud Pezeshkian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threats to Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US terrorism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Reza Nasri President Masoud Pezeshkian came to New York with a written text. After hearing US President Donald Trump at the same rostrum the day before, he set it aside, telling delegates he had prepared a speech before the US president called Iran a terrorist state. He was, by most accounts, the first ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Reza Nasri</em></p>
<p>President Masoud Pezeshkian came to New York with a written text. After hearing US President Donald Trump at the same rostrum the day before, he set it aside, telling delegates he had prepared a speech before the US president called Iran a terrorist state.</p>
<p>He was, by most accounts, the first leader to speak at the UN in person in the middle of a war with the United States.</p>
<p>Speaking from the heart is why the historic address will be heard well beyond the hall. It should not hide how precise it was &#8212; legally, morally and strategically.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/24/gaza-watches-israels-election-with-fear-and-antipathy"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Gaza watches Israel’s elections with fear and antipathy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Iran%2C+Palestine">Other Iran, Palestine reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>He opened with photographs of dead children, victims of American and Israeli bombs, and a direct reply: &#8220;We have been the victims of terrorism.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have only defended ourselves. We are not terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Palestinians know this inversion well. A people defends itself, and the aggressor calls the defence terrorism. Anyone who has watched the last seven months with clarity will recognise it.</p>
<p>He answered the bullying Trump had put on display, musing aloud about &#8220;annihilating&#8221; Iran, by standing on the ground of law. Everything said against Iran from that podium, he argued, contradicted the UN Charter.</p>
<p><strong>Use of force, threats forbidden</strong><br />
He is right. Article 2(4) forbids not only the use of force but the threat of it, and a head of state weighing the annihilation of a fellow member state before the General Assembly is as plain a threat as the Charter&#8217;s drafters could have imagined.</p>
<p>Iran asks for no special treatment, only the sovereign equality the Charter promises every member. On the nuclear file, his formula was &#8220;no nuclear weapons, and no limitations to peaceful nuclear technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is the NPT&#8217;s own bargain: the treaty bars non-nuclear states from acquiring the bomb, and its Article IV guarantees the &#8220;inalienable right&#8221; of every party to peaceful nuclear energy &#8220;without discrimination.&#8221;</p>
<p>He was equally plain that Iran built its defences to guarantee that any strike on its cities is answered. In Nicaragua v. United States, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that international law places no limit on a sovereign state&#8217;s armaments beyond what it accepts by treaty.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Iran&#8217;s President Pezeshkian displays images of Iran&#8217;s martyred Leader and the several children murdered in the US-Israeli attacks on Iran during his UNGA address.</p>
<p>Follow Press TV on Telegram: <a href="https://t.co/GHI09iAGh2">https://t.co/GHI09iAGh2</a> <a href="https://t.co/eGDt1DDAHA">pic.twitter.com/eGDt1DDAHA</a></p>
<p>— Press TV <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f53b.png" alt="🔻" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> (@PressTV) <a href="https://x.com/PressTV/status/2102774021763035329?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 23, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>He also took apart the Israeli-made story that Iran&#8217;s political establishment is on the verge of collapse, and that Iranians would welcome foreign invaders. For seven months people have been in the streets daily in support of the defence effort.</p>
<p>The same fact answers Trump&#8217;s claim that the Iranian state has killed tens of thousands of its own people. A population does not rally under bombardment behind a government it regards as its killer.</p>
<p><strong>Naming the war crimes</strong><br />
Then he named the war crimes. He showed images of the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab and of a sports hall in Lamerd where children had been playing. A weapon that scatters tens of thousands of tungsten fragments cannot be used on a school or a gymnasium without striking indiscriminately.</p>
<p>A UN fact-finding mission reported this month that there are reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed war crimes in the February 28 strikes. The US delegate left the hall during this passage. Pezeshkian drew the parallel with Gaza, where the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/26/un-court-orders-israel-to-ensure-acts-of-genocide-are-not-committed-in-gaza">ICJ has ordered Israel to prevent acts of genocide</a> and the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued <a href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/defendant/netanyahu">arrest warrants for its prime minister</a> and former defence minister.</p>
<p>He turned next to Israel&#8217;s nuclear arsenal. Israel stays outside the NPT and accepts no comprehensive safeguards, although the Security Council called on it in Resolution 487 of 1981 to place its facilities under IAEA safeguards, and the General Assembly repeats the call every year.</p>
<p>Israel has struck the capitals of its neighbours in breach of the Charter and carries out a documented pattern of war crimes, yet keeps its weapons with impunity. Iran, which has acted only in self-defence for two centuries, is sanctioned and attacked instead, although its facilities remain under an IAEA safeguards agreement.</p>
<p>On Hormuz, he described a strait closed to Iran even as it serves to ship missiles and weaponry into the surrounding region. The law of the sea does not allow this.</p>
<p>The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, which Washington invokes but has never ratified, requires ships passing through a strait to refrain from any threat or use of force against the states bordering it. Under the older rule of innocent passage, a ship serving an attack on the coastal state is no longer in innocent passage at all.</p>
<p><strong>Will not be shut out</strong><br />
Iran will not be shut out of its own waters while others use them to make war on it.</p>
<p>He closed on the indivisibility of security: it exists for everyone in the region or for no one. The idea has a long pedigree. European states wrote it into the Helsinki Final Act in 1975 and restated it in 1999, pledging not to strengthen their own security at the expense of others.</p>
<p>&#8220;We want strong neighbors,&#8221; Pezeshkian said. Iran has always been open to diplomacy, &#8220;without accepting the language of force.&#8221;</p>
<p><em><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><a href="https://x.com/RezaNasri1">Rez Nasri</a> is an international lawyer, foreign policy analyst, and he writes about Iran in Persian, English and French.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the wake of MIDA, Fiji&#8217;s news industry has turned full circle for media freedom</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/23/in-the-wake-of-mida-fijis-news-industry-has-turned-full-circle-for-media-freedom/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji media industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Media Industry Development Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji National University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalist training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PINA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebuilding trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savusavu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitiveni Rabuka]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Anish Chand in Savusavu In 2023, Fiji&#8217;s Media Industry Development Authority (MIDA) was scrapped, marking a significant moment for Fiji’s media landscape. A year later, at the PINA Media Summit in Niue, Fijian journalists spoke openly about rebuilding &#8212; of a media industry that was learning to find its feet again, reclaim its ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong><em> By Anish Chand in Savusavu</em></p>
<p>In 2023, Fiji&#8217;s Media Industry Development Authority (MIDA) was scrapped, marking a significant moment for Fiji’s media landscape.</p>
<p>A year later, at the PINA Media Summit in Niue, Fijian journalists spoke openly about rebuilding &#8212; of a media industry that was learning to find its feet again, reclaim its confidence and, importantly, rediscover its freedom.</p>
<p>At that Niue meeting, we lobbied and won the bid to bring 2026 PINA Summit to Fiji.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=PINA"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other PINA Pacific media summit reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>This week, we are in Savusavu and with Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka choosing to attend and officially open the summit almost four years after his government threw out MIDA, it feels like a full circle has been completed.</p>
<p>The Prime Minister’s announcement that Fiji National University will partner with the Fijian Media Association to establish a media training centre in Suva was the icing on the cake.</p>
<p>It is a significant commitment to strengthening journalism skills, professional development and the future of Fiji’s media industry.</p>
<p><strong>Allowed media space</strong><br />
Love him or hate him, Prime Minister Rabuka has maintained an open and accessible relationship with Fijian journalists. He has taken questions, faced tough interviews and allowed the media space to scrutinise his government and his decisions.</p>
<p>For an industry that has spent years navigating uncertainty, rebuilding trust and finding its voice, having the Prime Minister open the regional media summit in Fiji &#8212; and announce support for journalist training &#8212; was more than symbolic.</p>
<p>It was a reminder of how far we have come, and how much further we still have to go.</p>
<p><em>Republished from Fiji Times managing digital editor Anish Chand’s social media post with permission. He is a former Fiji TV news operations manager.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saige England: No judgments, freedom and about rocking the boat</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/22/saige-england-no-judgments-freedom-and-about-rocking-the-boat/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abayya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faux feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hijab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western expat women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western feminism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Saige England This is a photo of me in the desert in Saudi Arabia 19 years ago. Was I covered? You bet. I recall receiving a letter from a white feminist friend who told me my feminism must have been skewed by my experience in the Middle East. Actually I met so many ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Saige England</em></p>
<p>This is a photo of me in the desert in Saudi Arabia 19 years ago. Was I covered? You bet.</p>
<p>I recall receiving a letter from a white feminist friend who told me my feminism must have been skewed by my experience in the Middle East.</p>
<p>Actually I met so many feisty feminists in the Middle East and I found a Middle East very different to the one I&#8217;d seen on the mainstream media.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Saige+England"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Saige England reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>My Middle East was a Middle East of moons and stars and tents and light garments draped like tents. My Middle East was the Middle East of palaces in the desert and mysterious winds.</p>
<p>Were there things that were wrong there? Yes. Just as there are in the US. But I saw and experienced much that was good. I rose in my employment, I managed and supervised and I met other women who were managers and supervisors.</p>
<p>As one Italian woman said: &#8220;It is easier for me to rise as a woman here.&#8221; I found that too. I found work easily in Qatar. I found it difficult here in Aotearoa to rise, no matter how well I did in terms of qualifications and awards.</p>
<p>New Zealand is only free if you don&#8217;t write about certain matters. If you don&#8217;t rock the boat. If you aren&#8217;t too much &#8212; too pro the environment or too pro indigenous rights. I still write about those aspects of life.</p>
<p><strong>Relatively speaking</strong><br />
There, in Qatar, I worked with women who were covered and women who were uncovered. Relatively speaking.</p>
<p>I met women who covered from choice. I met women who were forced to cover (and that is wrong). I met women who were conservative and who didn&#8217;t cover. I met feminists who covered. I met women who wore the veil and the abbaya because they were radical &#8212; it was a way of giving the finger to the US.</p>
<p>Speaking of the US &#8212; US military bases were everywhere. The US had invaded Iraq. The military wives often drank a lot.</p>
<p>I interviewed US soldiers and found them worrying. Their education had been conservative, fundamentalist, narrow.</p>
<p>Many US soldiers were bright but they supported the US nuclear bombing of Japan, they supported nuclear everything. They thought all Arabs and environmentalists were terrorists.</p>
<p>When I first arrived, the Twin Towers had been bombed and I&#8217;d heard lots of reports about Al Qaeda. I used to leap into taxis vowing that I was not American. I was told that &#8220;it is ok, lady, we aren&#8217;t like those crazies&#8221; (people who blow up buildings).</p>
<p>The people I met were peaceful hospitable people. The women I met wanted careers.</p>
<p><strong>Issues were the same</strong><br />
One of my friends, an Aussie, was a psychologist. I asked her if the problems her female clients faced were different &#8212; did Western expat women have different issues to Qatari or Lebanese or Egyptian or Pakistani women? Nope. The issues were all the same: &#8220;Is my husband cheating on me?&#8221;, &#8220;Are my children OK?&#8221;</p>
<p>When I arrived in Qatar the divorce rate of the local population was 51 per cent. Many young women chose not to marry.</p>
<p>In Qatar and Bahrain women covered, or didn&#8217;t, by choice. Some told me they wore the garments because they were easy and affordable. They could dress up after uni but they could just grab the robe by day. Some wore the veil on a bad hair day. Oh, there were a raft of reasons.</p>
<p>What saddens and sickens me is that I&#8217;m often not believed about this. I&#8217;ve been accused of betraying the feminist cause. The kind of feminists who don&#8217;t ask other women what they want. Those kind of feminists tell me I compromised.</p>
<p>But I felt the compromise when I attended a tupperware party here where the whole room except me launched into racist jibes about Indians. Ye Gods, spare me.</p>
<p>Back here, a few years back, I befriended Fatin who came from Singapore and who lived here in Aotearoa while studying. Fatin was bright and so lovely, so open and kind and free. A poet. She read 30 books in a year. She loved the author, Elif Shafak, a favourite author of mine. We bonded.</p>
<p>But Fatin was often abused in Ōtautahi by people who told her she shouldn&#8217;t be wearing the veil or the robe. They felt sorry for her, they said. Fatin said she felt sorry for them for judging others.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;No judgment&#8217; . . . a favourite</strong><br />
&#8220;No judgement&#8221; was one of Fatin&#8217;s favourite sayings. I learned so much from her. Sadly, she had to leave because she couldn&#8217;t gain a residency visa.</p>
<p>Women wear clothing for all sorts of reasons. What concerns me far more than what we wear is unnecessary body surgery. I saw boob jobs and lip jobs, and jaw-broken jobs in the Middle East just as I see them in the West.</p>
<p>I see women manufacturing themselves as products to please men. It makes me sick. Don&#8217;t do it. Don&#8217;t. Be yourself.</p>
<p>I wore the robe and the veil that hot day in Saudi because it kept the sun and the hot dry wind off my face and body. Like so many women, I was naked underneath. I felt that warm wind caress me.</p>
<p>I loathe the men who make women wear what they don&#8217;t want to wear. I&#8217;ve always resisted that. I didn&#8217;t throw out my hippy skirt when my ex wanted me to, I kept it, cherished it, I sparkled and shone. But I&#8217;ve also felt shamed by women who tell me I shouldn&#8217;t bother using a towel to shield myself while getting dressed on the beach or while camping.</p>
<p>My choice sometimes is to cover. Sometimes the robe feels good. I like the feeling of having my own wee house and being safe underneath. That is my choice. If I lived differently or had different experiences or had never been abused in this Western world perhaps I would think differently but that is my experience.</p>
<p>I fight the predators in my own way. And I know that freedom is not here yet.</p>
<p><strong>Western abuse insidious</strong><br />
The abuse in the West is insidious. It is often denied. We believe we are free but we are not free. There is another form of control.</p>
<p>Women are bombarded with social messages that tell us to straighten our noses or lighten our skin. They are everywhere.</p>
<p>They appear on my feed as they probably appear on yours.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve aged in an age where I&#8217;ve watched young women pout and lie and become &#8220;influencers&#8221; selling all sorts of fake garbage and sadly, faking themselves. It isn&#8217;t good for their mental health. It isn&#8217;t good at all. Are they free? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>How do we unpick the social fabric of inequity especially when it tells us we are free.</p>
<p>Freedom is the freedom to choose. Freedom is the freedom to vote. Freedom is the freedom to use our voices and to wear what we want to wear. Freedom is the freedom and the choice not to turn ourselves into objects for the pleasure of others.</p>
<p>Freedom is the freedom to not be raped or abused or killed. Freedom is the freedom to love and learn. Freedom is the freedom to work &#8212; to work outside or inside and not be pressured to do both.</p>
<p>Women deserve freedom.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Saige+England">Saige England</a> is an award-winning journalist and author of </em><a href="https://aotearoabooks.co.nz/the-seasonwife/">The Seasonwife</a><em>, a novel exploring the brutal impacts of colonisation. She is also a contributor to Asia Pacific Report.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaza genocide: We made machines that think &#8211; then corrupted them for industrialised slaughter</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/21/gaza-genocide-we-made-machines-that-think-then-corrupted-them-for-industrialised-slaughter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI data factories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI genocide report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI killing systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lavender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Tracy Campbell There is something grotesque about taking one of the greatest intellectual achievements in human history &#8212; a technology capable of translating languages, modelling proteins, accelerating scientific discovery, assisting doctors, educating children and placing an astonishing repository of human knowledge at an ordinary person&#8217;s fingertips &#8212; and harnessing it to the ancient ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Tracy Campbell</em></p>
<p>There is something grotesque about taking one of the greatest intellectual achievements in human history &#8212; a technology capable of translating languages, modelling proteins, accelerating scientific discovery, assisting doctors, educating children and placing an astonishing repository of human knowledge at an ordinary person&#8217;s fingertips &#8212; and harnessing it to the ancient government business of deciding who may be killed.</p>
<p>States hardly needed technological assistance with that.</p>
<p>For as long as states have made war, they have assassinated, disappeared, tortured and executed.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Lavender’: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/20/the-controversial-documentary-naza-10-reasons-to-defend-this-whistleblower-war-on-gaza-film/">The controversial documentary NAZA: 10 reasons to defend this whistleblower war on Gaza film</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=AI+killing+in+Gaza">Other AI killing in Gaza</a></li>
</ul>
<p>They have acted on rotten intelligence, mistaken civilians for enemies, bombed the wrong houses and buried the innocent alongside the intended target.</p>
<p>Humanity has accumulated centuries of law in an attempt to restrain that capacity for violence.</p>
<p>Now we have given it an algorithm.</p>
<p>A <a href="https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/"><em>+972 Magazine</em> investigation</a> into Israel&#8217;s “Lavender” system used in the Gaza genocide describes an AI-assisted process that marked tens of thousands of Palestinians as suspected militants for potential assassination. Six Israeli intelligence sources described enormous target lists, scant human scrutiny and predetermined tolerances for civilian deaths.</p>
<p><strong>Significance of Lavender</strong><br />
The significance of Lavender reaches far beyond one system, one military, or one war.</p>
<p>Artificial intelligence does not hate anyone. It has no territory to conquer, no frightened electorate to appease, no flag to salute and no enemy it wants dead.</p>
<p>It cannot decide that one nationality, ethnicity or political movement is hateful. It cannot lust for revenge.</p>
<p>Humans supply the malice</p>
<p>And AI offers governments a hideous new possibility: not merely to make lethal decisions, but to industrialise them.</p>
<p>A human life can become data, the data a probability, the probability a classification and the classification a target. Somewhere along that progression, the unique, precious universe of a living person &#8212; somebody&#8217;s child, parent, lover, neighbour &#8212; disappears into a machine-generated assessment which can be processed thousands of times faster than any human being could properly investigate the people concerned.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t intelligence replacing human cruelty &#8212; it is human cruelty acquiring computational power.</p>
<p><strong>Recreated in machinery</strong><br />
Alan Turing wondered whether machines could think. John McCarthy gave artificial intelligence its name. Claude Shannon helped establish the mathematics on which our information age was built. Marvin Minsky devoted much of his life to understanding whether intelligence itself could be recreated in machinery.</p>
<p>They helped begin an intellectual adventure of almost preposterous ambition: to understand intelligence sufficiently well that we might reproduce some part of it.</p>
<p>Today Demis Hassabis speaks of developing AI to benefit humanity. Dario Amodei leads Anthropic, founded around the problem of making immensely powerful AI safe.</p>
<p>Sam Altman heads OpenAI, whose stated mission is to ensure artificial general intelligence benefits all humanity.</p>
<p>Surely this cannot be what benefiting humanity was supposed to mean.</p>
<p>AI may help us understand disease, proteins, climate, mathematics, language and perhaps eventually the nature of intelligence itself. Yet the same extraordinary capacity to detect patterns across quantities of information beyond the reach of a human mind can be turned towards finding patterns in a population and deciding which people resemble the people a state wants dead.</p>
<p>And therein lies another danger.</p>
<p><strong>Human judgement, evidence</strong><br />
When a human intelligence officer says, “I believe this person is a combatant,” we understand that a human being has made a judgment and can demand the evidence behind it.</p>
<p>When a machine assigns a probability, the mathematics can lend the conclusion an entirely undeserved aura of objectivity. But an algorithm cannot cleanse dubious intelligence, discriminatory assumptions or corrupted data merely by processing them at enormous speed.</p>
<p>Nor can it assume responsibility.</p>
<p>The analyst can point to the algorithm. The commander can point to the analyst. The politician can invoke the demands of war. The engineer can say the machine was only an advisory tool.</p>
<p>The machine, magnificently innocent of everything, points nowhere.</p>
<p>That is why human responsibility must remain absolute. I would go so far as to say that any use of AI in warfare should be prohibited.</p>
<p>Artificial intelligence must never become moral laundering for state violence. A computer-generated confidence score does not acquire the moral weight of evidence merely because mathematics produced it.</p>
<p><strong>10,000 suspicions</strong><br />
Processing 10,000 suspicions in the time a human being could properly investigate 10 does not make those suspicions more reliable. It merely makes killing scalable.</p>
<p>Turing did not ask whether machines could think so that governments could think less.</p>
<p>Human beings have finally built machines capable of doing things our ancestors could scarcely have imagined.</p>
<p>If one of the achievements of artificial intelligence is that it enables us to kill people faster, we will not have taught machines something new.</p>
<p>We will simply have taught them something terribly old.</p>
<p><em>Tracy-Moana Campbell is an employment relations advocate based in Masterton and an activist on Palestinian human rights. She had a commercial orange grove in Lebanon 10km from the Israeli border in 2005-2011. Israel bombed her oranges in 2006. It is a war crime to destroy civilian food sources. This commentary was originally a social media post but has been republished with the author’s permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caitlin Johnstone: Assange returns to public commentary . . .  and other notes</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/20/caitlin-johnstone-assange-returns-to-public-commentary-and-other-notes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 05:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bearing Witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A better world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aggressors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belmarsh Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Sheeran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neutral fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power imbalance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Empire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone Julian Assange is officially back on X/Twitter, restoring to the world an important voice we were robbed of by the US empire’s years-long campaign to silence the WikiLeaks founder via lifelong imprisonment for forbidden acts of journalism. Not everyone will remember it but there was a time when this was almost ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>Julian Assange is officially <a href="https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331" target="_blank" rel="noopener">back on X/Twitter</a>, restoring to the world an important voice we were robbed of by the US empire’s years-long campaign to silence the WikiLeaks founder via lifelong imprisonment for forbidden acts of journalism.</p>
<p>Not everyone will remember it but there was a time when this was almost impossible to imagine. It seemed almost certain that this man was going to die in Belmarsh Prison or spend his remaining years in some hellhole in America.</p>
<p>Now whenever my nephew catches me or my husband expressing pessimism about something working out, he tells us “Hey. Assange is free now.” It’s become our family code for “Anything’s possible. Don’t give up hope.”</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8yC2RMGM54" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>LISTEN:</strong> Video reading by Tim Foley</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Caitlin+Johnstone">Other Caitlln Johnstone reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/z8yC2RMGM54?si=7hXxmfD0kmCy-uHf" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Assange returns                                                 Video: Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>We should really try to appreciate this. Never let hope die. A better world is possible. Anything can be.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>In other news, it’s good to see the world rejecting Ed Sheeran’s policy of feigned neutrality on the Gaza issue. “I don’t pick sides” is a fallacy when there’s a massive power imbalance and a clear aggressor, especially when your own country is partially responsible for what’s happening.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">I&#8217;m back. <a href="https://t.co/2e58azeJkt">https://t.co/2e58azeJkt</a></p>
<p>— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) <a href="https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>If your husband is abusing your child and you do nothing, you’re not a neutral party in that scenario, and when your kid grows up you’ll probably be blamed just as much as the father.</p>
<p>A modern military force hammering a giant concentration camp full of colonised people using high-tech weapons of mass murder with the help of your tax dollars is not a “war” that you get to be “neutral” towards. It’s a genocide, and you’re either for it or against it.</p>
<p>There is no comfortable third option where you get to avoid picking a side and also avoid looking like an asshole.</p>
<p>One of the most idiotic talking points you’ll see these days is that it’s bad to criticise Israel without also criticising Hamas. It’s like, what do you mean? You’re saying I can’t criticise a nuclear-armed high-tech military committing war crimes with the backing of my own country and its allies unless I also criticise a tiny group of besieged militants?</p>
<p>You’re telling me I can’t say anything about the abuses of an apartheid state whose supporters are relentlessly assaulting my right to free speech and eroding civil liberties throughout the Western world, unless I in the same breath also criticise a few thousand Palestinian resistance fighters who have done me no wrong? What the hell are you even talking about?</p>
<p>No I’m just going to criticise Israel, thank you very much. I am going to criticise the state whose genocidal atrocities are supported by the power structure under which I live and pay taxes, whose support network is systematically demolishing the rights of me and my countrymen. If you don’t like it, go screw yourself.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">If you want to enrage an Israel apologist, tell them you won&#8217;t listen to the mountains upon mountains of verbiage they throw at you explaining why it&#8217;s actually fine to drop bombs on buildings full of children. <a href="https://t.co/61JI50IozZ">pic.twitter.com/61JI50IozZ</a></p>
<p>— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) <a href="https://x.com/caitoz/status/2099995294331273397?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><strong>I have a few more thoughts for today:<br />
</strong>Firstly, I love it when I see Israel apologists whining about people responding to their screeds with “I ain’t reading all that. Free Palestine.” All hasbarists have is endless mountains of verbiage explaining why it’s fine and normal to drop military explosives on buildings full of children, so it enrages them when someone takes away their only weapon.</p>
<p>They don’t have truth and morality on their side, so all they have is words, words, words, words, words. Take that away from them and they’ve got nothing, and they know it.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Imagine for 1 second that you have it wrong and Jews are telling the truth. That the genocide libel is bs. That Hamas are terrorists. That you are being manipulated to desire the removal of Jews from society.</p>
<p>Do you understand if we’re right, that makes you the millions of…</p>
<p>— Jonah Platt (@JonahPlatt) <a href="https://x.com/JonahPlatt/status/2100297744204313046?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>And finally, new rule: if you deny that Israel is guilty of genocide in Gaza, then the onus is on you to provide a convincing explanation for why <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/no-were-not-having-the-its-not-genocide">every human rights group</a> on earth (including the Israeli ones) agrees it’s a genocide.</p>
<p>If you hold that there’s an antisemitic conspiracy between all human rights groups, then the burden of proof is on you to show that conspiracy taking place.</p>
<p>If you hold that there has been an Islamist conspiracy to infiltrate all human rights groups, then you need to provide proof of that conspiracy.</p>
<p>If you hold that there is no conspiracy and it’s just a coincidence that all human rights groups happen to think Israel is committing human rights abuses, then you need to provide a convincing argument why every institution of human rights experts coincidentally came to the same conclusion and are still incorrect.</p>
<p>You can’t just say “I disagree with their findings” or “That one group made an argument I find weak” or “It’s not a genocide because blah blah blah”. You need to address the unanimous consensus, because that’s part of the debate now.</p>
<p>Even flat earthers and climate deniers who claim all the experts are wrong at least try to provide arguments for why there’s a secret conspiracy to amplify faulty conclusions in the scientific community, but deniers of the Gaza genocide somehow seem to think they don’t need to address their dissent with the overwhelming consensus of experts in the relevant field.</p>
<p>You don’t get to do that, guys. That’s not a thing. If you’re claiming the experts are lying about one specific country, then you need to provide a detailed and believable explanation for why that might be.</p>
<p>I’ve yet to encounter a single genocide denier who can do this, online or otherwise. Not one.</p>
<p>PS: Claiming you can’t accuse Israel of genocide until the ICJ rules it a genocide is exactly the same as claiming you can’t say Charlie Kirk was murdered until his killer has been officially convicted of murder.</p>
<p><a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/"><em>Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em> is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include <a href="https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-un-torture-report-on-assange-is-an-indictment-of-our-entire-society-bc7b0a7130a6">The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society</a>. She publishes a website and <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/">Caitlin’s Newsletter</a>. This article is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;End Times Fascism&#8217; &#8211; Naomi Klein, Astra Taylor on billionaires, bunkers, AI, Gaza and the Far Right</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/18/end-times-fascism-naomi-klein-astra-taylor-on-billionaires-bunkers-ai-gaza-and-the-far-right/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI fascists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astra Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate elites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture war issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data centres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy Now!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanity v machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scapegoats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shared world]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Democracy Now! AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, the War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman in New York joined by Democracy Now! cohost Juan González in Chicago. Hi, Juan. JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Hi, Amy, and welcome to all of our listeners and viewers across the country and around the world. AMY GOODMAN: “The people building ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.democracynow.org/"><em>Democracy Now!</em></a></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: This is <a href="https://www.democracynow.org/">Democracy Now!</a>, the War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman in New York joined by Democracy Now! cohost Juan González in Chicago. Hi, Juan.</em></p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Hi, Amy, and welcome to all of our listeners and viewers across the country and around the world.</em></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us by the end of the decade.” That was the warning last week from former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon that set off an escalating debate over how to regulate increasingly powerful AI systems. </em></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/10/ai-artificial-intelligence-billionaires-wealth.html"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> AI is creating new billionaires at a record pace</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=A1+developments">Other AI reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Coxon spoke to the BBC:</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>COXON:</strong> So it’s not at all an exaggeration to say that the people who were involved with both founding these companies and building the tech believe there is a possibility of human extinction.</p>
<p>And many of the people who are sort of deep in the weeds on actually coding the thing believe that there is like a greater than 10pc chance or even greater &#8211; some smaller, but they all have different numbers &#8211; for a probability that humans might die.</p>
<p>And they all keep this in their head on a daily basis while working on the technology.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei also called for the pace of development of artificial intelligence models to slow down. In an essay, he wrote that within six to 12 months a swarm of AI agents could be capable of taking over the entire internet and cause hundreds of billions of dollars in damage. </em></p>
<p><em>He wrote, “The scale of damage would continue to increase from there if AI becomes more powerful without the necessary guardrails.” But President Trump has rejected growing calls for placing regulatory guardrails on the AI industry and has called concerns over AI a “hoax”. </em></p>
<p><em>On Monday, Trump called Jensen Huang, the CEO of the computer chip maker Nvidia, while Huang was speaking at an AI summit in Los Angeles. Huang put the president on speakerphone.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRES. TRUMP:</strong> The data centers are great and they make people wealthy and they make states wealthy and it’s the oil of the next 20, 25 years. It’s bigger than the Internet.</p>
<p>And the AI, you know, much more so. And they are just playing right into the hands of a lot of people that don’t want to see it happen.</p>
<p>And that could be political people; it could also be China. And we’re not going to let that happen. It’s a hoax. And [crosstalk]—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>JENSEN HUANG</strong> [laughs] You’re right. We’re not going to let that happen, sir.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>AUDIENCE:</strong> [applause]</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRES. TRUMP:</strong> No, we’re not going to let it happen. The robots are not going to be taking over the world.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: As the debate over AI intensifies, the award-winning journalists and writers Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor have a new book out today that is connected to all of this. It is titled <a href="https://www.penguin.co.nz/books/end-times-fascism-9780241816288">End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World</a>. </em></p>
<p><em>It examines how wealthy elites, including tech CEOs, are preparing for the end of the world even as they contribute to growing inequality, political instability, wars and the climate crisis. They will join us in a minute but first, here is a short excerpt from a video that was released with the book.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>ASTRA TAYLOR:</strong> End-times fascism is not a monolith. It’s a dangerous and fractious alliance of three main groups.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NARRATOR:</strong> Religious end-timers.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>ROBERT JEFFRESS:</strong> From the very beginning it has been clear that god has a special plan and purpose for the nation of Israel.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NARRATOR:</strong> Tech end-timers.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>SAM ALTMAN:</strong> You know, I think AI will probably like most likely sort of lead to the end of the world. But in the meantime there will be great companies created.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NARRATOR:</strong> Ethnonationalist end-timers.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>BENJAMIN NETANYAHU:</strong> America is fighting with Israel for a common goal &#8211; to protect our future, to protect civilisation against these barbarians.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> That was a good take right there.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Seig fucking Heil, let’s fucking go!</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> You would prefer the human race to endure, right?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Uh—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> You’re hesitant.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Yeah, well, I—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> End-times fascists haven’t just given up on liberal democracy. They’ve given up on the possibility of a shared future for all of us.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> The most powerful people in the world &#8211;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> &#8211; are preparing for the end of the world &#8211;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong>  &#8211; an end they themselves are both accelerating &#8211;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> &#8211; and profiting from.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>ELON MUSK:</strong> [laughs]</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> We have imagined Armageddon so many times it can almost feel inevitable. Except it’s not. So, which side are you on?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> The side of bunkering down, abandoning Earth and profiting from apocalypse? Or staying loyal to this planet and its people—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Who are you aligned with? Who are you protecting?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> &#8211; and making life here better?</p></blockquote>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Qe7KB1AqhH4?si=K4wwVfM1eJaDSWde" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>&#8216;End Times Fascism&#8217;      Video: Democracy Now!</em></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: A short video released in conjunction with the new book End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World written by our guests in studio for the hour. </em></p>
<p><em>Naomi Klein, award-winning journalist, documentary filmmaker, best-selling author of a number of books including </em>Doppelganger<em> and </em>No Logo<em> and </em>The Shock Doctrine<em>. Naomi Klein is also an associate professor and co-director of the Centre for Climate Justice at the University of British Columbia in Canada. </em></p>
<p><em>Astra Taylor is an award-winning writer, activist and documentary filmmaker, the co-founder of the Debt Collective and author of several books including T</em>he Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things Fall Apart<em> and </em>The People’s Platform: Taking Back Power and Culture in the Digital Age<em>. </em></p>
<p><em>Thanks so much for spending the hour with us. Naomi, start off with a title, start off with End Times Fascism, why you chose this.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> First of all, thank you for having us here, Amy. It’s great to be launching the book on <em>Democracy Now!</em> It just came out this morning, as you said. And I think we have a long tradition of launching books together. We decided to call it <em>End Times Fascism</em> because we are trying to understand what is the same and what is different about our moment of far-right extremism.</p>
<p>We know that far-right parties with lineages to the fascists of the 20th century are rising to power around the world. We just saw a fateful election in a German state, the first time the far right has won an election since the Second World War. We’re seeing very disturbing polls in France, for instance.</p>
<p>And we’re seeing more and more open fascist expressions in the United States from very powerful people in government and in tech.</p>
<p>But we don’t believe that this is simply a rerun. We don’t believe that history repeats on a loop. We believe that we’re in something more like a sequel where the logics of fascism, which are the logics of dehumanisation, of othering, of racial supremacy and hierarchy, are now being applied in a time of global existential crisis. This is not news to <em>Democracy Now!</em> listeners and viewers that we live in a time of a climate breakdown and collapse.</p>
<p>We have tools like nuclear weapons, that were not known to Hitler and Mussolini, that have the ability to inflict apocalyptic levels of violence that were beyond their reach.</p>
<p>Fascism always emerges during times of systemic crises, and it actually emerges as a way to protect capitalism from systemic change. So if we think about 20th century fascism in Europe after the First World War, there was a rising socialist response to the wreckage of the First World War and then to the Great Depression.</p>
<p>And fascism rises up &#8212; we call it “capitalism threat response” or “capitalism with bared teeth” &#8212; to make sure all of that popular public anger is pivoted toward the scapegoat. In our time, as we see these global crises &#8212; that could lead to systemic change or there can be this what we are calling “end times fascist” response that says, “let it burn,” and now it’s a fight for who’s going to survive the future.</p>
<p>Now it’s about building &#8212; as you saw in that film that we were fortunate to work with a great team of filmmakers on &#8212; it’s about building the bunkers and the rocket ships and the escape hatches. For religious end-timers, it’s literally about the bunker in the sky; it’s about the idea of the rapture.</p>
<p>But that is almost like a template for these more secular stories that are also a kind of a rapture, but we call it in the book a “wealth rapture”. If you’ve got resources, you can rapture yourself away from the impacts of those threats that we are all in. So that’s why we call it <em>End Times Fascism</em>. It hasn’t won yet.</p>
<p>The reason we wrote the book is because people are fighting back. And we think if we are able to look at this very frightening reality with clear eyes, the more it is exposed to the light, the less popular it is because in fact those people cherish our one and only home and want to stay and want to make it better.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Naomi, how is this different, for example, if in the 1950s and 1960s when at the height of the Cold War there were Americans, especially upper-class Americans, building bomb shelters, convinced that there was going to be a nuclear war, and the rest of the population eventually began to organise in an anti-nuclear movement that peaked in the 1980s and that led really to capitalism being forced to restrain itself to some degree in terms of arms control treaties? </em></p>
<p><em>Why is this different than back then?</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Well, Juan, I guess it’s different because the people we’re calling end-times fascists are systematically dismantling that precise international infrastructure. One of the things that all those three factions all agree on &#8212; whether it’s the religious fundamentalists, the tech extremists that we heard from in that video, or the ethnonationalists &#8212; they don’t agree on everything but they all agree they want to get rid of the United Nations.</p>
<p>They all believe that that is the sort of antichrist of their story. Sometimes they literally call it the antichrist. And that chapter that you are describing, which we write about in the book, Juan &#8212; and I would actually love to bring Astra into the conversation because she went pretty deep into this research on the history of bunkering in the United States and how people shifted the tide, because we actually think that’s a really inspiring story that we need to know better.</p>
<p>Can I bring in Astra, my incredible co-author?</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Sure.</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR: </em>Thank you so much. Again, thanks for having us. Yeah, it is &#8212; very quickly, in the 1950s, the government policy was to encourage people to build their own bomb shelters in their backyard, and that was the response to the nuclear threat. Only around 1 percent, 2 percent of households did that, in part because people revolted at the idea of protecting themselves and letting their neighbors perish.</p>
<p>And there was a massive debate in magazines like <em>TIME</em> magazine, <em>LIFE</em> magazine that was around the idea of “gunning thy neighbor”. People said, “We don’t want to do that. We don’t want to be hiding in a hole in the ground with guns pointing outwards and turning the people we care about away.”</p>
<p>That is part of the genesis of the movement for nuclear disarmament. It was ordinary people who put the right solution on the table, which is let’s get rid of nuclear bombs; let’s not turn on each other and bunker down. There’s a lesson in that for today.</p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> It’s so interesting because what they understood at the time is like either you bunker &#8212; either you just protect you and yours &#8212; or you get at the root cause of the crisis and you say, “Actually, we can’t live with these weapons.” Right? It’s just—”It’s too dangerous.”</p>
<p>As you both know, the nuclear disarmament movement had tremendous successes. In many ways, we argue in the book that it was a victim of its own success because many people in the disarmament movement believed that they had won so many victories that now the people in charge were just going to finish the job, because so many thousands of nuclear warheads were successfully disarmed that it seemed like there was a new era.</p>
<p>The majority of the stockpiles were disarmed but not enough, and now there is a rearming and AI is being embedded in the nuclear arsenal. Which is why at the end of the book we call for a triple disarmament movement.</p>
<p>In fact, Juan, we have something that you might be interested in &#8212; a new coinage in the book &#8212; which is “the Stephen Miller test”. Basically the argument that we’re making is that eventually, the most powerful tools, the most powerful weapons, will meet the worst people in the world, and if you don’t want those tools to find themselves in the hands of Stephen Miller, then the tools should not exist.</p>
<p>That applies to nuclear weapons. It applies to AI. It applies to the wealth concentration itself, which we believe should be now understood as a WMD. That this level of wealth that has accumulated at the top of our economy has itself become a weapon of mass destruction.</p>
<p>And so we need to be disarming the wealth bombs, the tech bombs, and of course, the bomb-bombs. Because we are now seeing that these very dangerous, completely immoral people who seem to have such a casual attitude &#8212; and we see this from Donald Trump’s most recent post, just a kind of shrug in the face of apocalypse &#8212; they will find &#8212; they exert a magnetic pull towards one another.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: I wanted to follow-up and ask either one of you if you want to answer this, because I did read the book in the last couple of days and really found it to be tremendously well written. At the same time, though, there were some concerns I had. For instance, there is very little mention of the rise of a multipolar world, of how the rise of East Asia, especially, the shift of the world’s industrial working class to China, Vietnam, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, along with Brazil and Mexico &#8212; in the view of many, that is the single biggest impediment to US economic dominance, of the capitalist markets’ expansion. </em></p>
<p><em>And that’s also the biggest threat that many of these end-timers, as you label them, are concerned about. They are concerned about China, yet China and its impact on US hegemony and capitalism is not mentioned at all in the book.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Well, I think that the threat of China is really, really central to the unimpeded AI rollout. It’s really the only argument they have. We do write about that in the book, but you’re right, it’s not the central focus of the book. We are more focused on the United States and the way in particular this is being pushed through Latin America, because we think there &#8212; and Europe.</p>
<p>But the threat of the multipolar world I do think is central, because the only argument that Donald Trump really has in the face of the threats that are now being articulated from inside the house, from inside the companies, is “But China, but China; if we don’t build it, they will.”</p>
<p>It’s completely untrue that deregulated AI has to be built the way it’s being built or else China will build it. China is much more open to regulating these technologies, to rules within the multilateral system. It’s the US that has been blowing up these agreements.</p>
<p>And when the Doomsday Clock was reset this year, it was a really &#8212; I mean, it’s always pretty harrowing, but this year it was particularly so; they moved it forward four seconds &#8212; and described not just the threats, whether it was biological weapons, nuclear weapons, AI, but the way the US government under Donald Trump was going after all of the international agreements that governments like China had been a party to, and just saying, “We don’t need them.”</p>
<p>So I think it’s the tools and the dismantling of any attempt to constrain those tools.</p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR: </em>It’s also about the narrative that the people in power are telling themselves. We’re tracking how there’s a certain embrace of apocalyptic narrative, of Armageddon, of the end times, that doesn’t &#8212; every government in the world doesn’t have that narrative, right? It’s something that’s very powerful in certain branches of the United States political class, in Israel, in parts of Latin America.</p>
<p>We’re not saying that it applies to every country around the entire world, and so that’s one reason that that isn’t &#8212; there are some very powerful international players that aren’t central to the thesis.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Astra and Naomi, you write about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel">Peter Thiel</a>, saying, “Today a staggering number of his former colleagues and acolytes occupy powerful positions in every part of the Trump Administration. The most consequential of them is JD Vance.” If you can explain, who is Peter Thiel? What does it mean to have his inner circle populating the inner circle of the United States? </em></p>
<p><em>And talk about all of these figures that are so much in the news now, that were standing behind President Trump during his inauguration, people who were opposed to him before, who took him off their platforms. We are talking about people like Jeff Bezos, people like Mark Zuckerberg and others.</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR: </em>Yes. Peter Thiel is a powerful billionaire and venture capitalist who has been in Silicon Valley for a long time. He is part of the PayPal mafia so he founded PayPal with David Sacks, who was Trump’s former AI and crypto czar. And also Elon Musk, of course, who is now the president of SpaceX; everybody will know him.</p>
<p>Peter Thiel is quite interesting because he has been on the far right very proudly for a long time since he was an undergraduate at Stanford when he and David Sacks actually wrote a book against political correctness. And he has been on the vanguard of being very much against democracy, very &#8212; quasi-libertarian but now just explicitly authoritarian &#8212; and has written things like “Democracy and freedom are incompatible.”</p>
<p>He was one of the first figures in Silicon Valley to come out for Trump in 2015.</p>
<p>And as we write in the book and, as you said, many of his protégés are now in positions of power and the most influential one is JD Vance. JD Vance has written about how his life changed when he saw Peter Thiel give a lecture. This lecture inspired Vance to go to Silicon Valley to become a venture capitalist &#8212; not a very illustrious one &#8212; and that’s where he met critical figures who would fund his political rise, including Thiel who gave what was a record-breaking donation of $15 million and kind of launched and made possible Vance’s bid to become a senator of Ohio.</p>
<p>And it was Peter Thiel who also brokered the meeting at Mar-a-Lago where Vance was able to apologise for calling Donald Trump “Hitler”. So Vance is of course one of those figures who used to be opposed &#8212;</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Explain that? That Vance said &#8212;</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR:</em> Yeah, Vance was once &#8212; he was once for green energy. He was against Donald Trump who he said misleads people and offers empty promises like building a wall which won’t actually improve people’s lives. But he’s also quite an opportunist, and Peter Thiel brokered peace among those two, and now we know Vance as the VP.</p>
<p>J.D. Vance is also critical in our book because he is who helped bring together the AI industry and Donald Trump. We remember from Donald Trump’s first term that he was against Big Tech. He was railing against Big Tech all the time. Thanks to JD Vance who hosted a dinner at David Sacks’ house, Trump got on the AI train. It was a fundraiser but it was also a pitch session.</p>
<p>Vance’s Silicon Valley brethren told Donald Trump that AI would be good for the economy but it would be very good for the fossil fuel sector. And now we see that the Trump administration is all in on AI and not much else.</p>
<p>So when we look at the famous image of the second Trump inauguration and we see all those tech execs given their front seats and they’re lined up, our position is that it was the promise of generative AI eating the economy that actually turned them fascist and caused this incredible alliance with the Trump regime that we’re seeing.</p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Yeah, that alliance has served them incredibly well. It has produced the first trillionaire. It has produced companies that are claiming valuations roughly equivalent to the entire US economy. And what they wanted from Donald Trump was exactly what they got: a frontier.</p>
<p>You hear this phrase used all the time now &#8212; ”frontier AI” &#8212; but if you think about what a frontier is, a frontier is a Wild West. It has no rules. And what they were upset about under the last administration was that there were some, you know, not radical, very simple rules like you have to label deepfakes, guardrails against precisely the scenarios that they are now talking about in terms of integration with weapons systems, and the prospect of a rogue AI.</p>
<p>So all of this was on the table years ago. There were discussions at the United Nations.</p>
<p>It’s interesting that they’re always using China as the bogeyman of why they have to roll out AI without rules. China has many more rules regulating AI than the United States has,<br />
including rules around not allowing children to have these like personal relationships with AI where there’s confusion about whether or not you are talking to a friend or a robot or a therapist or whatever it is.</p>
<p>First of all, that’s a lie, and that’s just the fact that people are not educated about what China is doing that is allowing people to fall for this line of, like, “Oh, no, if we don’t do it, China will.” They just simply don’t know how China is regulating this.</p>
<p>But one of the things I’ve been thinking about is &#8212; and we have to be aware of how active this push was for the frontier, because now of course these CEOs are all coming forward and saying “Please regulate us, we’ll regulate ourselves, we know we need to be regulated,” as if they weren’t the ones who not only demanded this Wild West frontier but bankrolled it and created the strategic alliance with Donald Trump so that he would deliver it to them.</p>
<p>And now they’re realising, “OK, maybe we’ve gone too far and have to look more credible.” And Donald Trump is going, “No way.”</p>
<p>Why is he saying, “No way”? Because he has tanked the entire US economy and the only thing he has going for him is the AI stock bubble, and he’s terrified of this bubble bursting all over him before the midterm elections or before the next presidential.</p>
<p>He also is very invested in it personally. He’s richer than he has ever been because of the rampant corruption of this administration, the money he has made from crypto but also many different ways that he and his family are invested in AI.</p>
<p>So that’s why he’s doing these frantic things like calling Jensen Huang on stage to say, “Don’t worry, we’re not going to do anything.”</p>
<p>But if you’ll allow me, I was really struck because there’s this myth that &#8212; these sort of parables of the technology slipping out of the hands of the men who built it, right? The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, Frankenstein. Creating a monster right?</p>
<p>That’s the myth that they’re all telling. “Oh no, we’ve created this powerful monster. It’s out of our hands and now it’s going to destroy us.” I would argue that that myth really is coming true but the monster is not AI; it’s Donald Trump.</p>
<p>They created Donald Trump, he is their monster, he’s out of control and he just won’t stop. And they’re like, “Wait a minute, maybe it is going too fast.”</p>
<p>[MUSIC BREAK]</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, the War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman with Juan González. We are spending the hour with Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor, co-authors of the new book </em>End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World<em>. I want to go back to the video that was released in conjunction with the book.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>NAOMI KLEIN:</strong> On a mountaintop in the dead of winter, a group of faithful men gathered an audience to share their vision. They had seen a gleaming city bathed in golden light.</p>
<p>The city would be filled with buildings so beautiful they would seem to float above the earth as if descended from heaven. Their vision already had a name.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> New Gaza.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>JARED KUSHNER:</strong> So, we’ll see if these things work. They never usually work.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NAOMI KLEIN:</strong> The mountaintop in question was the resort town of Davos. The faithful men presenting their vision were US real estate moguls Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP:</strong> Well, this is a very exciting day. See, I’m a real estate person at heart and it’s all about location. Look at this beautiful piece of property.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Let’s just plan for catastrophic success.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NAOMI KLEIN:</strong> Out of the horrors of a live-streamed genocide, an exclusive paradise was about to emerge fully formed.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> We’ve already started removing the rubble and doing some of the demolition.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Part of the video that was released with the book </em>End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World<em>. It is by Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor. I want to talk about Gaza right now. We are coming off &#8212; in Venice right now you have two Israeli filmmakers, Rachel Szor and Yuval Abraham, who just came out with a film called </em>NAZA<em> and now members of the Israeli government are threatening to take away their citizenship, and it was based on the commentary of high-level Israeli officials, unnamed, talking about the killing in Gaza deliberately. Naomi Klein?</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Yeah, and the use of AI to do so. I actually haven’t seen the film. I’m definitely looking to see it. But it underlines what we already know thanks to Palestinian journalists at huge personal cost in the documenting of a livestream genocide.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Over 250 of them killed in this last two years.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> And as we say in the film, this is the story that the Trump administration is telling, is that out of apocalypse there will be this paradise. There will be what they are calling “New Gaza”. We begin the book with it because it is such an extreme distillation of the story.</p>
<p>And I believe it’s the most dangerous story ever told. It’s a biblical story. It’s deeply encoded in our culture whether we’re religious or not. And the story is first comes the flood, first comes the apocalypse, first comes the mass death &#8212; and out of the mass death, the great cleansing, the fury of god, comes the golden city, the paradise, for the chosen few.</p>
<p>That story, which &#8212; it’s the story of the flood and the ark; it’s told in its most violent form in the book of Revelation &#8212; for people who believe in it literally, it has confused the difference between bad and good. It has kind of flipped the switch, where when we see the things in our world that should be warning us, telling us we need to act, we are in a time of crisis, it is an emergency &#8212; whether it’s climate disasters, whether it’s covid, that things are breaking down &#8212; that what is seen instead are signs.</p>
<p>“Oh, no, what it means is that we’re entering the end times.” And while that may be bad for many people, it’s actually very good for the chosen few.</p>
<p>That’s why we started with this myth of New Gza . . . there is no paradise that is coming out of the apocalypse in Gaza but that is the story that the Trump administration is telling. It’s a privatized paradise that they’re proposing to build. They are using this kind of biblical narrative but of course it’s all for profit because it’s the Trump administration. They want to build luxury condominiums over a mass grave. And you saw there that it’s a literal story.</p>
<p>We do think that the Board of Peace is significant in the sort of evolution of the privatisation of the state, the fact that the Trump Administration is not just attacking the United Nations and defunding the United Nations but trying to replace the United Nations with something called the Board of Peace, which Trump would be head of for life, that they would control &#8212; they would give themselves immunity.</p>
<p>This is part of what we mean by bunkering, by escaping. It’s like they see the state as a mine site. They see the United States as a place that they can extract from. Not just extract wealth and resources &#8212; and we’re watching them do that &#8212; but also extract other things that matter to them, like legal immunity. Right? I mean, the Board of Peace gives them that.</p>
<p>So that’s why we start with that. And it brings together these different parts of the coalition. Because there are religious extremists, both Christian Zionists and messianic Jews, who really do believe that Gaza, Iran &#8212; mean that the Messiah is coming. Like the more violent, the better.</p>
<p>And you’ve covered on the show officers in the US military lodging complaints that their officers are telling them that they should welcome apocalyptic levels of violence in Iran because it means that Jesus is returning.</p>
<p>But it’s not just the religious extremists. It’s also the secular versions of the story. We don’t think Trump believes in the biblical version of this story, but we do believe he believes in a kind of a wealth rapture. And when you see those AI-generated images of new Gaza and Trump sharing them, you can see how these stories have distorted his brain.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: In the little time we have left, I’m wondering if you could talk a little bit about the resistance movements, the people’s movements against this growing fascism, and also perhaps deal with some of the critiques of let’s say of Marxists like John Bellamy Foster, who basically insists that the fascist movement in the United States, the mass base of it is really the middle class, those people driven out by the Walmarts and the Targets from small businesses, and franchisees and others who have been driven down by the growth of these top-end monopoly capitalists and who have now turned to a fascist movement for their salvation.</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR:</em> To answer the second part first, fascism is always a movement of the injured powerful. It is a movement that creates vertical solidarity between political and corporate elites and people who are not the worst off but feel that they’ve lost status and directs their sense of insecurity downwards further towards vulnerable scapegoats &#8212; towards immigrants, towards trans kids, towards feminists &#8212; instead of upwards at the oligarchs and the politicians.</p>
<p>So that’s how we understand Elon Musk buying X or what was Twitter, right, is that it was a way for him to control a media ecosystem and help direct that rage downwards at the left and at the vulnerable instead of letting it be harnessed towards people like him.</p>
<p>So I think that that’s right, if fascism creates what we call a vertical solidarity to protect capitalism, to protect the status quo. That’s certainly true of fascism in the past and it’s certainly true today.</p>
<p>What we have to do to build the resistance is create that horizontal solidarity, to not scapegoat the vulnerable, to build our own coalition and find our own unusual bedfellows. I think you see that in the resistance to fascism that’s growing in the United States and around the world.</p>
<p>One thing &#8212; Naomi said this &#8212; the people we’re tracking &#8212; end-times fascism is not a coherent ideology necessarily. It’s not a monolith. It’s a fractious alliance of these three groups: the religious end timers, the tech accelerationists, the ethnonationalists.</p>
<p>But what they have in common is this sense that things are going to be increasingly unstable. We say that they’re both building their arks and they’re causing the floods. They’re accelerating collapse. They’ve decided to just bring it on and abandon this shared world in their various fantasies about bunker nation or ascending to heaven or the digital class.</p>
<p>So the resistance fundamentally needs to be grounded in a desire to stay here on Earth, to commit to this place. We describe them at one point in the book as traitors to creation. And we don’t use that word “traitors” lightly. We are saying they’re not traitors to the flag or the nation but actually to life on Earth, to our shared humanity, our shared planet.</p>
<p>And I think we see that commitment to what we call “hereness” in the book in the movement against data centers that is sweeping the nation, in the resistance to ICE where people are saying, “No, I’m going to defend my community, defend my neighbors” and people standing up and fighting for labour rights, which fascists are always attacking.</p>
<p>Fighting for the environment, fighting against detention centers.</p>
<p>And so we see the resistance growing all over the world, but I think that the data center revolt is the main one for us because it really draws new lines and shows people &#8212; is bringing people together who a year ago or a couple of years ago might have been fighting over culture war issues.</p>
<p>Now they’re saying, “Well, actually, we have a lot in common because there’s a class of people who actually want to replace us with robots. Maybe we should be on the side of humanity against the machines.”</p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN: </em>Including those small business people, Juan, who you were referring to. This is why it really is an opportunity to form those new alliances. Because Donald Trump has betrayed many of the people who did vote for him the first time. The trouble, of course, is that many powerful Democrats are also taking money from the large tech companies and so are not willing to harvest what has been called by a comedian in I believe it was Madison &#8212; ”the most bipartisan issue since beer” is the opposition to these tech companies.</p>
<p>But in order to gain political advantage from that huge bipartisan issue, you have to be willing to go against your donors or not take their money in the first place.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Naomi, the business model of these AI fascists, if they were to be able to prevail, throw millions of people out of work, how will they make their money? Because obviously Henry Ford, back in the days of the early monopoly capitalism, believed you had to give workers a living wage so they could consume the products that you produced.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN: </em>Well, I’m not sure it’s all that thought through. I think that they think they’re mainly going to be selling products to other businesses in the short term. But this is why, Juan, it is a bubble, and it is a process of extraction, and the bubble is rigged to explode all over working people and their pensions right now.</p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR:</em> Yeah, I think they also think that they’ll make a lot of money hooking up with the government and the military. There is a quote from Alex Karp &#8212; who is a colleague of Peter Thiel, CEO of Palantir &#8212; and he said &#8212; we quote him in the book saying, “If these tech companies think they’re going to take everybody’s jobs and then not work with the military, they are” &#8212; I’m going to change what he said and say &#8212; ”they are foolish.”</p>
<p>What he’s saying is essentially if you’re planning to build a technology that causes a job apocalypse, you are also going to have to align with the state and help build the mechanisms to police and control and contain the masses of dispossessed human beings.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to end with the end of your book: “We didn’t choose to be born into a fight quite so fateful but we have reached a choice point. We can either follow end-times fascists into oblivion or we can commit to building the unruly, boundary-crossing movement they so deeply fear, one that wrests away their weapons, holds them accountable for their crimes, and defends the paradise of here.”</em></p>
<p>Those are the words of Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor, co-authors of the new book out this week, <em>End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World</em>.</p>
<p><em>The original content of this programme and article is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t Democrats outshine a dangerous, unstable, delusional, egomaniacal Trump?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/15/why-cant-democrats-outshine-a-dangerous-unstable-delusional-egomaniacal-trump/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egomania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Nader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support for Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Israel attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Israel war machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Because former president Joe Biden backed Israel&#8217;s genocidal Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump avoids accurately accusing Biden of aiding and abetting genocide. Tyrant Trump has continued providing powerful weapons and unconditional political backing, writes Ralph Nader for Common Dreams. ANALYSIS: By Ralph Nader In his rambling and incoherent remarks for nearly two hours over two nights ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Because former president Joe Biden backed Israel&#8217;s <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine+Gaza">genocidal Benjamin Netanyahu</a>, Donald Trump avoids accurately accusing Biden of aiding and abetting genocide. Tyrant Trump has continued providing powerful weapons and unconditional political backing, writes Ralph Nader for <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/"><strong>Common Dreams</strong></a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Ralph Nader</em></p>
<p>In his rambling and incoherent remarks for nearly two hours over two nights before a knee-jerk crowd in Dallas last week, Trump provided ample evidence that he is a dangerously unstable, delusional, egomaniacal, and megalomaniacal personality.</p>
<p>He pushed for this unusual midterm <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/gop">GOP</a> convention to shore up his dwindling faithful followers and get out the votes in what is likely to be a losing midterm election for <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/republicans">Republicans</a> in the House and maybe the Senate on November 3, 2026.</p>
<p>That is, if Trump fails to steal the election, as a 22 single-spaced-page account published by the <em><a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/washington">Washington</a> Spectator </em>documented in alarming detail (see <a href="https://us.list-manage.com/ZekE3vY2yuP?e=8e411e9705&amp;c2id=8e3459eb78ddc0e9b4695a09351ef532" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dancing in the Dark, Part 4</a> by Mark Medish and Joel McCleary).</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/15/us-supreme-court-rejects-trump-mail-ballot-restrictions-ahead-of-midterms"><strong>READ MORE: </strong> US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions ahead of midterms</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/12/war-on-terror-how-9-11-changed-the-language-of">‘War on terror’: How 9/11 changed the language of conflict</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine+Gaza">Other Palestine, Gaza reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://us.list-manage.com/8JYVX001Eah?e=8e411e9705&amp;c2id=8e3459eb78ddc0e9b4695a09351ef532" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CNN reported</a> that Trump brazenly urged his followers “to ‘cheat like hell’ to help Republicans keep control of Congress… and asked supporters to treat November’s elections as if he were on the ballot”.</p>
<p>Trump certainly lied like hell as he repeated again and again his standard lies about the Trump economy and the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/why-can-t-democrats-defeat-trump">United States’ standing in the world</a>.</p>
<p>He lied about the number of illegal aliens entering the US and the crimes they have committed during the Democratic administration.</p>
<p>He lied about “bringing food prices and almost every other item rapidly coming down,” … “no tax on Social Security,” “the US is producing more <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/oil">oil</a> and gas than Russia and <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/saudi-arabia">Saudi Arabia</a> combined,” “sixty-five billion barrels [of oil] in <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/venezuela">Venezuela</a> are ours,” “raking in trillions of dollars in tariffs” “making [America] richer than we ever thought,” “we now pay the lowest prices in the entire world for prescription drugs,” labeled the Democrats “communists” when he extorted companies to give the federal government part ownership as he courts and praises two communist dictators &#8212; Russian President <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/vladimir-putin">Vladimir Putin</a> and North Korea’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un.</p>
<p><strong>Unfunded fake promises</strong><br />
Then there are the legally questionable and unfunded fake promises to give every adult $5000 if the GOP wins Congress in November.</p>
<p>He boasts of having the greatest military in the world as he approves the firing of seasoned, experienced generals and admirals who might question the sanity of his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who calls himself “a warrior of God in the service of Jesus Christ,” while running out of ammunition in the service of Israel’s mass murdering <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/genocide">genocide</a> of Gaza’s civilian <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/children">children</a>, mothers, and fathers.</p>
<figure id="attachment_128078" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-128078" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="wp-image-128078 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide.png" alt="&quot;The message is clear to every current or aspiring Republican politician: Be a toady to Trump, or you’re out.&quot;" width="680" height="502" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide-300x221.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide-80x60.png 80w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide-569x420.png 569w" sizes="(max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-128078" class="wp-caption-text">Trump’s practice is to mix lavish praise for loyalists by name while assailing opponents with scurrilous libels. Image: robertreich.substack.com</figcaption></figure>
<p>Trump lied about named Democratic politicians and wildly praised Ken Paxton as the greatest state attorney-general in history. Paxton is a crook, having been impeached by his own party in the state House, but was acquitted by the Senate.</p>
<p>Conviction on any article required a two-thirds vote &#8212; 21 of the 30 eligible senators. Paxton escaped conviction by seven votes.</p>
<p>Trump viciously exaggerated Joe Biden’s physical mobility and mental condition and falsely claimed the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/biden-administration">Biden administration</a> wrecked America in all ways. This is the same polite <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/joe-biden">Joe Biden</a> who transferred power in the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/white-house">White House</a> on January 20, 2025, greeting Trump with “Welcome Home”.</p>
<p>Because Biden backed the same genocidal Netanyahu, Trump avoids accurately accusing Biden of aiding and abetting genocide. Tyrant Trump has continued providing powerful weapons and unconditional political backing.</p>
<p>Trump’s practice is to mix lavish praise for loyalists by name while assailing opponents with scurrilous libels, including two Senate Democratic candidates, Roy Cooper of North Carolina and Abdul El-Sayed (typically mocking his last name) of Michigan.</p>
<p><strong>Zig zag displays on Newsmax</strong><br />
On frantic zig zag displays at his podium, faithfully played on Newsmax &#8212; the very biased and often slanderous channel built for Trumpism &#8212; were vivid demonstrations of his megalomania and egomania.</p>
<p>Trump told the crowd on September 9, 2026, that “everybody loves me, and I love everybody.” The following evening, he asked supporters to raise their right hands and recite a pledge to “the greatest president in the history of the United States” &#8212; a reference to himself.</p>
<p>Perhaps these are his greatest lies, as he wrecks the lives of the poor, federal civil servants, firefighters, scientists, the sick and injured who needed insurance and benefits, and key protective and nurturing programmes for children in both Red and Blue states and overseas in <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/africa">Africa</a> and Asia.</p>
<p>For some reason needing psychiatric explanation, he hates and undermines wind power and solar energy, while embracing oil and gas, “clean, beautiful coal” to worsen global omnicidal warming.</p>
<p>With his polls plunging and his postings on his misnamed “Truth Social” further bolstering the assessment of his worsening mental stability by 30 credentialed mental health professionals &#8212; both Democrats and Republicans (see April 30, 2026 of <a href="https://us.list-manage.com/qgPdrmrLy9S?e=8e411e9705&amp;c2id=8e3459eb78ddc0e9b4695a09351ef532" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Congressional Record</em></a>), Trump is running out of words like “lunatics,” “fanatics,” and “maniacs” to tarnish his critics with descriptions that apply to his own zany, lying, corrupt, violent, treacherous, law-violating, vengeful, obsessive, reality-faking daily impeachable behaviors.</p>
<p>His endless self-naming mania went viral with his planting American flags on a map covering Canada, <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/greenland">Greenland</a>, Mexico, Iceland, <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/cuba">Cuba</a> and Jamaica.</p>
<p>The man, with his finger on the nuclear trigger, who calls violent climate intensities “a hoax” and scoffs at scientists’ warning of coming pandemics, is openly and proudly out of control.</p>
<p>It is time to fire Duplicitous Doubling-down Donald.</p>
<p>Ponder why the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/democratic-party">Democratic Party</a> is befuddled without a coherent way of responding to “crazy Donald” or a coherent, authentic pledge to the American people about what they intend to do for and with them should they regain control of Congress and the Presidency.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.commondreams.org/author/ralph-nader">Ralph Nader</a> is a consumer advocate and the author of The Seventeen Solutions: Bold Ideas for Our American Future (2012). His new book is, Wrecking America: How Trump&#8217;s Lies and Lawbreaking Betray All (2020, co-authored with Mark Green). Republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ elections: Where are much-needed party policies on media?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/15/nz-elections-where-are-much-needed-party-policies-on-media/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign digital players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace inequity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media organisations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ elections 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ media policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of journalism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[KNIGHTLY VIEWS: By Gavin Ellis Two months out from New Zealand&#8217;s general election, and we have yet to see new policy from any of the seven main political parties on media and communication. Only the Greens have a media policy on their website &#8212; and it is effectively a repeat of the 2023 policy that ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="https://knightlyviews.com/">KNIGHTLY VIEWS</a>:</strong> <em>By Gavin Ellis</em></p>
<p>Two months out from New Zealand&#8217;s general election, and we have yet to see new policy from any of the seven main political parties on media and communication.</p>
<p>Only the Greens have a media policy on their website &#8212; and it is effectively a repeat of the 2023 policy that was heavy on high-minded rhetoric but very light on functional detail. No party has yet presented voters with practical initiatives that take account of the significant shifts in the media industry since the last election.</p>
<p>Admittedly, this is not the sort of policy that will sway voters, but manifestos are more than vote-grabbers. They represent commitments by each party to use their best endeavours during the coming Parliamentary term to give effect to what they say they will do in the interests of the public good.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gavin+Ellis"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Gavin Ellis articles on media</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Unless there is a sudden avalanche of media policy promises, the signal the parties are sending is that, in this area of public policy, they plan to do very little.</p>
<p>I do not believe our politicians are unaware of the precarious state of journalism in this country. They have been lobbied by every media organisation and left in no doubt that the cuts that have kept newsrooms in operation are not sustainable in even the medium term.</p>
<p>The have been warned we will see the loss of significant news publications and news broadcasts within the term of the next government unless there is a reset. The playing field needs to be levelled to overcome the pernicious effects of uncontrolled foreign digital players in our media market.</p>
<p>Those effects are not only financial. They include significant civic, social and cultural consequences. We have already suffered damage caused by years of political inaction and ineffectiveness, but believe me, worse will come unless significant change is forthcoming.</p>
<p><strong>Comfortable with less scrutiny</strong><br />
One of my worries is that, irrespective of high-minded utterances about the importance of journalism to democracy, most politicians are comfortable with less scrutiny of their activities by journalists than with an enhanced ability to speak truth to power.</p>
<p>Too many politicians, and the functionaries who spread their messages, mistakenly believe that their responsibility to keeping the public informed is met by speaking directly to constituents through social media and email lists, and that news media are no longer needed.</p>
<p>They are mistaken because scrutiny is the missing element in that interpretation of their social contract. Scrutiny includes ferreting out those matters of public interest that politicians would prefer you do not see or hear.</p>
<p>There is also a prevailing view that commercial news media are creatures of the marketplace and should, like any other business, stand or fall on the basis of their ability to sell goods or services.</p>
<p>Under the model prevailing when they were created, that is a valid viewpoint. However, that model is broken and has been dysfunctional long enough for some parts of it to become almost irretrievable.</p>
<p>Some will say that is the nature of the marketplace &#8212; ever changing and requiring nimble business practices to keep pace. It is only to be expected that some businesses will fail because they do not (or cannot) adapt.</p>
<p>Again, that is a valid viewpoint. But it is one that does not recognise two things. The first is the civic and social roles that news media play in a society that requires diverse and independent sources of information to properly function. The second is the inequity of a marketplace in which foreign players can plunder content with impunity and avoid the taxes and regulations that burden domestic media.</p>
<p><strong>Untouchable foreign players</strong><br />
Beyond the marketplace are the social harms that are undeniably caused by those apparently untouchable foreign players and the as-yet-unquantifiable effects of their use of artificial intelligence.</p>
<p>The present government’s introduction (not passage) of legislation to introduce an Australian model under-16 ban on social media appears to be a calculated pre-election move, rather than an earnest attempt to deal with the problem (see below).</p>
<p>That Bill may look as if we are catching up with other countries on media policy, but the reality is that we have been left far behind. Inaction and widespread political indifference could see an incoming government face a firestorm of compounding consequences.</p>
<p>There are eight areas that all political parties need to address. I would like to think they could reach consensus on most of them.</p>
<p>The first is to create an enforceable environment that will allow all news organisations to negotiate financial compensation from foreign digital platforms for the use of content. That use would include search and social media plus large language models and other artificial intelligence assets.</p>
<p>The Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill that has lain dormant in Parliament throughout the term of the present government should be resurrected, updated to bring its provisions in line with those of Australia, and extended to account for developments in artificial intelligence.</p>
<p>The second is to enforce the provisions of the OECD profit shifting framework to impose a tax on revenue that is currently moved offshore in the form of service payments. The resulting impost, which would be in addition to the money negotiated by news organisations, should be used to finance non-profit local and iwi news initiatives.</p>
<p><strong>Sustaining local newsrooms</strong><br />
The third is the adoption of policies to help sustain local newsrooms. Two initiatives should be considered. Firstly, the State of California’s Community Newsroom Employment and Workforce Sustainability Act which will provide refundable tax credits to local newsrooms for each journalist they employ.</p>
<p>Such measures could be used to help sustain local and iwi news outlets. The Californian legislation, which passed the Senate and Assembly by overwhelming majorities and is awaiting Governor Gavin Newsom’s signature, extends eligibility to print, broadcast, digital, nonprofit, and independent family-owned news outlets. It is regarded as a blueprint for other states to follow.</p>
<p>Secondly, there is a British initiative that allows local authority rates relief on local news premises. The virtue of policies such as these is that they are effectively revenue neutral. Without the help, the newsrooms would not exist.</p>
<p>The fourth policy relates to public media. The amalgamation of Radio New Zealand and Television New Zealand should be resurrected in light of TVNZ’s increasingly problematic advertising revenue base and the need to affect cost savings in both organisations.</p>
<p>The funding system for both organisations, together with Whakaata Māori and Iwi Radio, should be reviewed and consideration given to triennial funding.</p>
<p>The fifth policy should be a comprehensive review of the future of terrestrial broadcasting and the consequences of moves to digital-only delivery. Its deliberations should include possible disenfranchising of the elderly and poor; the impact on Māori broadcasting; the impact on TVNZ news services that could arise in a move to video streaming on demand; and the consequential uses of radio spectrum.</p>
<p>The sixth policy should be an urgent review of the harmful effects of social media that would include, but not be limited to, the effects on those under the age of 16. The proposed ban is based on that currently enacted in Australia, which has been been ineffective. Australia’s internet regulator, eSafety, last month issued the results of a study that found that more than eight in 10 Australian under-16s are continuing to use social media despite the ban.</p>
<p><strong>Platform operators as publishers</strong><br />
The review should consider deeming social media platform operators to be publishers (on the basis that their algorithms and AI tools manipulate content and determine audiences) and liable for infringements of law and regulation.</p>
<p>The seventh policy initiative should be a comprehensive review of media regulation and the development of an independent framework for complaint and adjudication. The review should embrace not only local media but also foreign-controlled digital platforms with New Zealand user bases over a certain size. Pending the adoption of findings from the review, existing regulatory bodies (state and industry-led) should remain in place.</p>
<p>Finally, any policies relating to artificial intelligence should make specific reference to news media, the integrity of news content, and intellectual property rights. It should include measures to limit the spread of disinformation, the verification and validation of legitimate news content produced by journalists, and the identification of AI-generated content.</p>
<p>Our political parties &#8212; and the public &#8212; need to understand the consequences of failing to deal effectively with what will become increasingly existential issues for journalism. Perhaps their starting point should be a general enquiry into the viability of New Zealand journalism and our media infrastructure, even if it tells them what some of us already know.</p>
<div><a href="https://knightlyviews.com/about-ua-158210565-2/"><em>Dr Gavin Ellis</em></a><em> holds a PhD in political studies. He is a media consultant and researcher. A former editor-in-chief of </em>The New Zealand Herald<em>, he has a background in journalism and communications — covering both editorial and management roles — that spans more than half a century. This article was published first on his </em><a href="https://knightlyviews.com/"><em>Knightly Views</em></a><em> website on 15 September 2026 and is republished with permission.</em></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pacific remembering September 11 . . .  25 years on</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/12/pacific-remembering-september-11-25-years-on/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 06:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[25th anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papali'i Mele Maualaivao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNZ Pacific Waves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twin Towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Trade Centre]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Susana Suisuiki of RNZ Pacific The 9/11 attacks on the United States claimed thousands of lives, stunned the world, and triggered responses that continue to shape global politics, security, and public life today. A series of coordinated attacks in the United States killed almost 3000 people, with planes hijacked and crashing in Pennsylvania, the ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Susana Suisuiki of <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/pacific/1350076/remembering-september-11-25-years-on">RNZ Pacific</a></em></p>
<div class="p-4">
<div class="space-y-3 article-body">
<p>The 9/11 attacks on the United States claimed thousands of lives, stunned the world, and triggered responses that continue to shape global politics, security, and public life today.</p>
<p>A series of coordinated attacks in the United States killed almost 3000 people, with planes hijacked and crashing in Pennsylvania, the Pentagon in Washington DC, and most prominently, the World Trade Center in New York City.</p>
<p>While the world watched in horror at the unfolding events, the <a href="https://archivesfoundation.org/newsletter/911-in-photos/">memories of 9/11 are etched in the minds</a> of those who survived or witnessed the attacks. That day is especially personal for Samoan Papali&#8217;i Mele Maualaivao who was living in Brooklyn at the time.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA_WOgci0z4"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> How 9/11 permanently reshaped US and global security</a></li>
<li>&#8216;<a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2026/9/11/everything-changed-the-human-cost-of-25-years-of-us-wars">Everything changed&#8217;: The human cost of 25 years of US wars</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/734/937">Freedom of speech: From 9/11 to Fiji coups, a shocking and devastating tragedy &#8212;</a> <em>David Robie</em></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=9%2F11">Other 9/11 reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Papali&#8217;i, who is now living in Samoa and championing women through her work with United Nations Women, still vividly recalls one thing above all &#8212; the smell.</p>
<p>Speaking to <i>Pacific Waves</i> Papali&#8217;i said she first saw the smoke billowing from one of the Twin Towers on television that morning, believing a helicopter had crashed into the building. However, the situation became more devastating when both towers had collapsed, sending a vast cloud of ash and debris that engulfed the streets of New York.</p>
<p>The debris reached Brooklyn, right through the neighbourhood and onto the home Papali&#8217;i lived in.</p>
<p>&#8220;I remember seeing it raining down in my house, out around my house,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p><strong>Incinerated remains</strong><br />
&#8220;So, you would see little bits of paper that were obviously from offices, ash and there was just the smell of like incineration. At the time, we didn&#8217;t realise that we were smelling, you know, the incinerated remains of everybody who&#8217;d been trapped in that building.&#8221;</p>
<p>Papali&#8217;i said in the days after the attacks, the weight of the tragedy started to set in and she had set off to donate blood at the Red Cross but was told that no bodies had yet been pulled from the wreckage. New York became a surreal landscape of profound grief, thick dust and heightened security.</p>
<p>The aftermath of September 11 dominated news coverage, with Papali&#8217;i recalling seeing people interviewed on television making desperate appeals for information about their missing loved ones.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is before social media was really big right. So on the news every day, there&#8217;d be somebody being interviewed saying, &#8216;have you seen my mother?&#8217; &#8216;have you seen my father?&#8217; &#8216;have you seen my brother?&#8217; &#8216;have you seen my sister?&#8217; and there were people putting up posters up everywhere of relatives in hopes that some way or some how they were still alive.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, Papali&#8217;i knew of two individuals who died in the building and said the loss of lives had affected everybody even if they had not personally lost a close family member.</p>
<p>Twenty-five years later, Papali&#8217;i has not visited the memorial site despite making trips to New York since and said she doesn&#8217;t know if she&#8217;ll ever stop by as she feels the space is meant for families of those who died.</p>
<p>The events surrounding 9/11 has given Papali&#8217;i a greater appreciation of community and service which has continued on in her work in Samoa.</p>
<figure id="attachment_133451" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133451" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-133451" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall.png" alt="Photos captured by John Celardo, former archivist at the National Archives " width="500" height="766" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall-196x300.png 196w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall-274x420.png 274w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133451" class="wp-caption-text">Photos captured by John Celardo, former archivist at the National Archives branch in New York City on September 11, 2001. Image: National Archives Foundation</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Sense of unity</strong><br />
Living in a city of millions where people usually kept to themselves, the tragedy created an unexpected sense of unity. Papali&#8217;i said she now recognises the bravery of first responders, firefighters, police officers and other emergency workers who put themselves in dangerous situations to save others.</p>
<p>Her hope is that remembering the loss brought on by 9/11 will encourage people to be kinder instead of using it as fuel to hate.</p>
<p>&#8220;I hope people realise that these moments, while they can be really scary and horrific and because of social media, you have so many more images of what&#8217;s occurred. I hope it causes one to be kinder in just your everyday life.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mele&#8217;s experience was one of the Pacific connections to the attacks.</p>
<p>Two New Zealanders were among those killed &#8212; Auckland-born environmental lawyer Alan Beaven, who was aboard Flight 93 which crashed in Pennsylvania, and US-born John Lozowsky, a dual New Zealand citizen who worked in New Zealand during the 1990s, died in the collapse of the World Trade Center.</p>
<p>Their names are among the nearly 3000 people remembered at the 9/11 Memorial in New York.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="flex items-center border-t justify-between m-4 mt-0 pt-4">
<p><em>This story was first published on</em></p>
</div>
<div>
<div class="flex items-center border-t justify-between m-4 mt-0 pt-4"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="h-6 w-auto" src="https://connect.rnz.co.nz/rnz-logo.svg" alt="RNZ Connect Logo" width="130" height="69" data-nimg="1" /></div>
</div>
<div class="px-4 sm:pl-0 pt-4"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Zionists drop case against &#8216;truth&#8217; journalist Mary Kostakidis</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/12/australian-zionists-drop-case-against-truth-journalist-kostakidis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consortium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Kostakidis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBS News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist Federation of Australia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Zionist Federation of Australia has withdrawn its case of &#8220;racial hatred&#8221; against Australian journalist Mary Kostakidis, who called it a victory for free speech, reports Consortium News. SPECIAL REPORT: By Joe Lauria After a two-year legal battle to punish a prominent Australian journalist for her public criticism of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the Zionist ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Zionist Federation of Australia has withdrawn its case of &#8220;racial hatred&#8221; against Australian journalist Mary Kostakidis, who called it a victory for free speech, reports <strong>Consortium News</strong>.<br />
</em><strong><br />
SPECIAL REPORT:</strong> <em>By Joe Lauria</em></p>
<p>After a two-year legal battle to punish a prominent Australian journalist for her public criticism of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the Zionist Federation of Australia (ZFA) has withdrawn its case.</p>
<p>“This is a win for every Australian who values our democratic right to freedom of political expression,” Kostakidis said on X. “Zionist zealotry has had to beat a retreat from what was going to be a highly damaging trial.</p>
<p>“The purpose of journalism is to get to the truth &#8212; fearlessly &#8212; and to hold power to account. This is a win for press freedom, which has prevailed.“</p>
<p>Kostakidis, who anchored the SBS national news for nearly 20 years, was a high-profile target for the Zionist Federation in its quest to silence outrage over Israel’s conduct in Gaza.</p>
<p>Alon Cassuto, the ZFA chief executive who brought the case against Kostakidis, claimed on X that he withdrew it on Thursday to deprive her of a platform. He <a href="https://x.com/ZionistFedAus/status/2098199154619187588">wrote</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I do not intend to spend another year taking Ms Kostakidis’ repugnant commentary from the dark corners of the internet and giving it a Federal Court platform in her pursuit of martyrdom. My job here is done.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The majority of his statement was a continued attack on the journalist. He claimed that the action he brought against Kostakidis was satisfied by an apology she had issued. But that was two years ago and he pursued his case against her nonetheless.</p>
<p>What he did not mention is a recent series of court decisions in Australia by judges who upheld the right to criticise Zionism, which appears to have weakened his chances of winning.</p>
<p>Kostakidis had also won approval for full discovery of ZFA communications.</p>
<p>In claiming victory, Kostakidis wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Watching a people live stream their own genocide while the international community responsible for creating this mess offers the victims sympathy and the perpetrators bombs, diplomatic cover and impunity, has been disgusting.</p>
<p>&#8220;Thank you to the Jewish and Israeli people all over the world raging against this in recognition our common humanity trumps any form of tribalism.</p>
<p>&#8220;Australia must stop disregarding the Orders of the International Court of Justice which were clear: we are obliged under international law to take meaningful action to prevent genocide in Palestine and to do all in our power to bring about an end to apartheid.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hypocrisy, double standards and a lack of courage are aiding the destruction of a framework intended to protect against the worst excesses of state power.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Joe Lauria is editor-in-chief of </em><em>Consortium News and a former UN correspondent for </em>The Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe,<em> and other newspapers, including </em>The Montreal Gazette<em>, the </em>London Daily Mail <em>and </em>The Star<em> of Johannesburg. He was an investigative reporter for the </em>Sunday Times<em> of London.</em></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Breaking: Zionists legal proceedings against me have been withdrawn after a 2 year battle.</p>
<p>This is a win for every Australian who values our democratic right to freedom of political expression. Zionist zealotry has had to beat a retreat from what was going to be a highly…</p>
<p>— <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4a7.png" alt="💧" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />Mary Kostakidis (@MaryKostakidis) <a href="https://x.com/MaryKostakidis/status/2098198663189446710?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>In citizen responses to this article published by <em>Consortium News</em>:</p>
<div class="comment-author"><em>Anthony Kevin (September 11, 2026):</em></div>
<div class="comment-text">
<p>Whatever Cassuto’s rationalisations for their withdrawal, the Australian Zionist cause is bound to suffer big reputational damage over this. I am sure Joe Lauria is right that they ended the case because after the recent decision by NSW Supreme Judge Fagan, they were going to find it a hard case to sustain.</p>
<p>Especially as Zionist Israel keeps on humiliating and exploiting Australian governments and elites.</p>
<p>Mary was looking more and more like Joan of Arc. And the Zionists more and more like Torquemada of the Spanish Inquisition.</p>
<p><em>Graeme D (September 11, 2026):<br />
</em>Mary stood where no Australian legacy MSM dared stand. Sycophants one and all, so ready to bend.</p>
<p>She showed courage and a dedication to telling the truth about a genocide when Australian legacy outlets banned journalists from using that word, even after the ICC unequivocally declared that a &#8220;plausible genocide&#8221; was being perpetrated.</p>
<p>Mary stood where most MPs feared to stand.</p>
<p>As Hunter S. Thompson &#8212; another fearless journalist &#8212; wrote, “anyone who goes to caught takes a wolf by the ears.”</p>
<p>Mary did this, and is one of the few to &#8220;win&#8221; at probably a heavy personal cost.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caitlin Johnstone: Three major revelations about the Gaza holocaust in the Israeli press</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/11/caitlin-johnstone-three-major-revelations-about-the-gaza-holocaust-in-the-israeli-press/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Accords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caitlin Johnstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptian intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haaretz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samir Mashharawi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Arab Emirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahya Sinwar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone The Israeli press has published three significant revelations about the Gaza holocaust, reporting (1) that Benjamin Netanyahu concealed advanced knowledge of the Hamas attack on October 7, (2) that Israel rejected a Hamas offer to release all civilian hostages immediately after October 7, and (3) that according to an IDF drone ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>The Israeli press has published three significant revelations about the Gaza holocaust, reporting (1) that Benjamin Netanyahu concealed advanced knowledge of the Hamas attack on October 7, (2) that Israel rejected a Hamas offer to release all civilian hostages immediately after October 7, and (3) that according to an IDF drone operator, the Israeli military was intentionally firing on civilians throughout Gaza during its operations in the Palestinian territory.</p>
<p>The first two come from a <em>Haaretz</em> article titled “<a href="https://archive.is/rX9Zj" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Revealed: Netanyahu Received an Explicit Warning Days Before Oct. 7. He Didn’t Brief Israel’s Security Chiefs</a>”, which was released ahead of an upcoming <em>Haaretz</em> book about the hostage standoff in Gaza.</p>
<p>Haaretz describes a call between Netanyahu and UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, citing three foreign senior sources:</p>
<blockquote><p>“A week and a half before October 7, 2023 the Emirati ruler called Netanyahu from the Presidential Palace in Abu Dhabi and spoke with him for 45 minutes. In that conversation, bin Zayed warned that Hamas’ leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, was planning a major operation against Israel.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bin Zayed expressed concern that the event in question would not only lead to bloodshed but also destabilise the entire region and undermine the Abraham Accords.”</p></blockquote>
<figure></figure>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtYNAFBoNFk" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>LISTEN</strong>: A reading by Tim Foley</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Haaretz</em> reports that rather than pass these warnings on to Israeli national security officials, Netanyahu chose to sit on information which an unnamed Shin Bet official said could have “changed our entire assessment picture”.</p>
<p><em>Haaretz</em> also notes that Israel had received similar warnings about a coming Hamas attack from Egyptian intelligence, which had been reported earlier.</p>
<p>These are just two items in the <a href="https://booty.substack.com/p/october-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mountains</a> upon <a href="https://booty.substack.com/p/before-107-idfs-gaza-border-spotters" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mountains</a> upon <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTfhoeKparU" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mountains</a> of <a href="https://archive.is/VpvyV" target="_blank" rel="noopener">evidence</a> indicating that powerful people in Israel knowingly allowed Hamas to inflict as much damage as possible on October 7, 2023, in order to advance the murderous ethnic cleansing objectives we’ve seen rolled out in the years since.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Nothing will make you a conspiracy theorist faster than learning basic facts about what happened on October 7 2023. <a href="https://t.co/J2q26vlDiy">https://t.co/J2q26vlDiy</a> <a href="https://t.co/Optx60745g">pic.twitter.com/Optx60745g</a></p>
<p>— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) <a href="https://x.com/caitoz/status/2097239765032816897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Nothing will turn you into a conspiracy theorist faster than learning basic facts about what happened on October 7. But even without knowing those facts it already strains credulity to believe Israel had no advance knowledge of a complex attack which would require extensive <a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YHljeToXyME" target="_blank" rel="noopener">open-air training</a> in one of the most <a href="https://politicstoday.org/israels-mass-surveillance-of-palestinians-is-more-than-an-obsession/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">heavily surveilled</a> strips of land on our planet.</p>
<p>Especially when you look at all the pre-existing military agendas Israel was able to push forward in the aftermath.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Ha&#8217;aretz reports that Hamas, through Qatar, conveyed immediately on Oct. 7 that they were willing to return all the civilian hostages for nothing &#8212; their only ask was for a mediator to arrange the exchange and establish a connection to then negotiate the further release of the… <a href="https://t.co/DYRze8r9bf">pic.twitter.com/DYRze8r9bf</a></p>
<p>— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) <a href="https://x.com/ryangrim/status/2097495935072780500?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 9, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Later in that same article, <em>Haaretz</em> quotes a Palestinian politician named Samir Mashharawi describing what Hamas leadership told him during his mediation efforts between Israel and Hamas after October 7:</p>
<blockquote><p>“He told me that in the first stage, they had no problem releasing all civilians without anything in return,” Mashharawi recounts.</p>
<p>“I swear, those were his exact words: all civilians, without anything in return. They had only one condition: They wanted us to bring in an agreed-upon mediator as quickly as possible, so that negotiations could immediately begin over everything else.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Mashharawi said Israel rejected the offer. A senior Israeli defence official corroborated this, telling <em>Haaretz</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>“The release of the hostages did not even enter the list of war objectives formulated by the government on the night of October 7.</p>
<p>&#8220;Could the proposal have been properly discussed and a decision reached? In substantive terms, the answer is yes.</p>
<p>&#8220;But the prevailing mood was like after Pearl Harbor: We had just suffered a brutal blow, we were in the midst of war, who had the bandwidth to talk about stopping the fighting and starting negotiations now, even if it was to save the lives of dozens of people, whose final number was still unknown?”</p></blockquote>
<p>So all that hasbara about the hostages and the Bibas kids and how Hamas needed to be destroyed because they were refusing to release innocent civilian captives was complete bunk from the very beginning.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LtYNAFBoNFk?si=OiLwtdyYSxT-bAiL" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>Hamas offered to release them with no conditions but the opening of communication lines. Israel refused, because what they wanted was to steal more Palestinian land. It was never about the hostages, and anyone who said it was is a liar.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>Lastly, a separate <a href="https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/magazine/2026-09-09/ty-article-magazine/.premium/000001a0-7712-d7d5-a9fc-7fffb1a00000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">report in Hebrew from <em>Haaretz</em></a> quotes an Israeli air force reserve major describing how IDF policies and culture ensured the deaths of large numbers of civilians. Here are a few quotes, <a href="https://x.com/academic_la/status/2097634374355419618" target="_blank" rel="noopener">translated by</a> Israeli-American political analyst Shaiel Ben-Ephraim:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;1) He was involved in the March 23, 2025 paramedic killings in Tel al-Sultan, Rafah, and said, &#8216;You could clearly tell these were rescue vehicles even as fire was opened on them from the ground.&#8217;<br />
&#8220;For no apparent reason, the force on the ground charged the convoy. They shot the first vehicle, the medical personnel got out, hid behind the ambulances and begged for their lives, and the soldiers shot them one after another.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;2) On how the yellow line was used as an excuse to kill innocent people: “The Palestinians didn’t know it existed, and the Air Force wasn’t always updated either.</p>
<p>&#8220;From the perspective of a farmer walking onto his own land — he has no idea he’s stepping into an area the IDF suddenly decided is a fire zone. &#8220;And then all kinds of retroactive justifications started coming up. ‘He came for an arms deal.’ ‘He touched the ground, maybe he’s planting an explosive.’</p>
<p>&#8220;To me it looked like they were trying to incriminate people with no intelligence and no proof.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;3) On how all morals were lost in Gaza: &#8216;The feeling was that something tore, everyone had already become cynical about death, you can’t understand it from the outside. It’s not just fatigue, it’s an erosion of morality, of responsibility, of the sense that someone is still managing the event.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;Very quickly this whole business of ‘collateral damage’ disappeared from the considerations. They fire on anyone they see. The atmosphere started to be like the stands at a soccer match. The way you shout at a player, ‘Yalla, score,’ that’s how they shout at a soldier, &#8216;Kill him, strike him.'&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Like the other revelations, this report further discredits the lies the public was sold about Israel’s reasons for its atrocities in Gaza.</p>
<p>All those <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/aug/21/revealed-israeli-militarys-own-data-indicates-civilian-death-rate-of-83-in-gaza-war" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lies</a> about how Israel is taking extraordinary measures to protect civilian life in Gaza and only kills civilians because Hamas “hides behind human shields” has been thoroughly discredited by <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/israel-is-killing-civilians-in-gaza" target="_blank" rel="noopener">copious amounts of evidence</a> that Israel was going out of its way to kill noncombatants throughout the course of the onslaught.</p>
<p>The world was lied to about the Gaza holocaust, just like it was lied to about every other act of mass military slaughter that the US involves itself in. Please carry these lessons into the future.</p>
<p><a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/"><em>Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em> is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include <a href="https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-un-torture-report-on-assange-is-an-indictment-of-our-entire-society-bc7b0a7130a6">The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society</a>. She publishes a website and <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/">Caitlin’s Newsletter</a>. This article is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pacific Islands Forum leaders in Koror &#8211; heavy on reaffirming but light on tasking</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/11/pacific-islands-forum-leaders-in-koror-heavy-on-reaffirming-but-light-on-tasking/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bougainville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiribati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nauru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palau-Belau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tahiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timor-Leste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanuatu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bougainville independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese missile tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate delegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum's envoys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanesian Spearhead Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific civil society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Islands Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF communiqué]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's representation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Tess Newton Cain and Stefan Armbruster With a Chinese ballistic missile test in July as prelude, the familiar China-Taiwan tensions and preparations for the Pacific pre-COP in October and COP31 the following month, the annual Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting (PIFLM) returned to Palau last week for the first time in 12 years, ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="header reader-header reader-show-element">
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Tess Newton Cain and Stefan Armbruster</em></p>
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="moz-reader-content reader-show-element">
<div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
<div>
<p>With a Chinese ballistic missile test in July as prelude, the familiar China-Taiwan tensions and preparations for the <a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.gov.fj/fiji-australia-and-tuvalu-strengthen-cooperation-ahead-of-pre-cop-and-cop31/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific pre-COP</a> in October and COP31 the following month, the annual Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting (PIFLM) returned to Palau last week for the first time in 12 years, and north of the equator for the first time since Pohnpei in 2016.</p>
<p>Preparations for the 55th PIFLM were still underway as delegates arrived in Koror. <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/forum-faces-packed-agenda-and-partner-pressure-in-palau/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">An expected 2000 people</a> soon choked the town as motorcades shuttled VIPs between hotels and venues.</p>
<p><a href="https://tncpacific.substack.com/p/pacific-leaders-where-the-bloody" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Attendance speculation</a> dominated the early part of the week. The leaders of Fiji, Kiribati, New Caledonia, Samoa and Vanuatu were absent, and barely anyone mentioned that New Zealand’s Christopher Luxon, chair from 2027, <a href="https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2026/09/03/fuel-climate-and-security-on-agenda-as-luxon-joins-pacific-leaders-retreat/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">only planned to attend the retreat</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/10/pacific-islands-forum-is-australia-out-of-touch-with-the-pacific-and-climate/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Pacific Islands Forum: Is Australia out of touch with the Pacific and climate?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Pacific+Islands+Forum">Other Pacific Islands Forum reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Kiribati, close to Beijing, sent <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/pacific/1200583/missing-leaders-won-t-derail-pacific-islands-forum-outcomes-secretariat-says" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Director of Foreign Service and former ambassador to China, David Teaabo</a>, but he was <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-04/pacific-leaders-criticise-china-missile-test/107114182" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">not in the room for the retreat</a>, where the missile response was thrashed out, and Kiribati was <a href="https://www.1news.co.nz/2026/09/05/disappointing-kiribati-snubbed-at-pacific-islands-forum-closing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">initially omitted from acknowledgements at the closing session</a>, which Teaabo called “protocol-wise … not good”.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-30/solomon-islands-prime-minister-no-confidence-motion/107094924" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matthew Wale</a>, Prime Minister of Solomon Islands and outgoing PIF chair, added to the drama: met on arrival on the evening of Saturday, August 29, by journalists asking about a no-confidence motion lodged in Honiara that day, he flew home in the early hours of Sunday. (The motion was <a href="https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/9345391/no-confidence-vote-in-solomon-islands-pm-wale-pulled/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">withdrawn on September 7</a>.)</p>
<p>Invited back were the Forum’s 21 dialogue partners, excluded from last year’s meeting in Honiara over China-Taiwan tensions, along with the sole “development partner”, Taiwan. At the opening ceremony, China’s envoy Qian Bo and Taiwan’s foreign minister Lin Chia-lung were <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-01/china-warns-of-consequences-over-taiwan-attendance/107100296" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">seated in the same room</a>.</p>
<p>The week culminated in <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2026-09/55PIFLM%20Communique.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the communiqué</a>, 76 paragraphs under headings tracking the thematic areas of the <a href="https://forumsec.org/2050strategy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent</a>. Leaders endorsed “revised Communiqué drafting procedures”, but the document is increasingly flabby and lacks forward momentum: “reaffirmed” appears 38 times and “endorsed” 20; “agreed” 14 times, twice only in principle; “tasked” once.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Partnership streams&#8217;</strong><br />
Leaders agreed on the placement of partners in the two “partnership streams” created by last year’s <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/54th%20Pacific%20Islands%20Forum%20Leaders%20Communique_final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leaders Policy on Partnerships</a>, the communiqué’s only words on the subject. As the Secretariat <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/forum-faces-packed-agenda-and-partner-pressure-in-palau/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">explains it</a>, Tier 1 “strategic partners” keep leader-level access, while Tier 2 “sectoral partners” engage only at ministerial level on specific issues, with placements reviewed after a year.</p>
<p>Secretary General <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_Waqa" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Baron Waqa</a> will now <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/forum-outcomes-highlight-complex-and-challenging-strategic-environment/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">write to the countries concerned</a>. The communiqué does not name them, but the <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-04/pacific-leaders-criticise-china-missile-test/107114182" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ABC</a> and <a href="https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/pacific-islands-forum-statement-on-chinese-ballistic-missile-test/pq71exzgy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SBS</a> report that the 13 strategic partners are China, the United States, Japan, France, India, Indonesia, Germany, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada, Singapore, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates.</p>
<p>That leaves in the second stream Türkiye, the host of COP31, and Thailand, whose prime minister is coming to the pre-COP, and six others. Their reactions will be watched closely.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/09/04/pacific-leaders-issue-belau-call-to-keep-1-5c-alive/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belau Declaration for Urgent and Inclusive Climate Action to Keep 1.5°C Within Reach</a> was issued the day after a sobering <a href="https://www.unep.org/resources/limiting-overshoot-navigating-exceedance" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">UNEP report</a> confirmed that the target will be overshot, as the declaration itself concedes.</p>
<p>It restates the Pacific position more strongly for the pre-COP and COP31 but sets out no pathway for returning the issue to centre stage globally; that job is deferred to the leaders’ meeting in Tuvalu that sits alongside the pre-COP proper, which Fiji co-hosts.</p>
<p>After Australia failed to secure a Pacific COP31, the consolation prize of a pre-meeting had been sold as a chance for world leaders to see Pacific climate impacts firsthand.</p>
<p>Fiji’s foreign minister, Sakiasi Ditoka, <a href="https://www.thenational.com.pg/fiji-reveals-pre-cop-attendees-at-pacific-summit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">revealed</a> that the leaders of Antigua and Barbuda, Cabo Verde, Thailand, Maldives and Timor-Leste would come, along with a handful of ministers. Leaders do not usually attend pre-COPs, but the media presented the low turnout as a <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/just-five-nations-outside-the-pacific-to-attend-australian-climate-event-20260902-p60tov.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">major embarrassment</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Australian sticking point</strong><br />
For some, Australia’s own contribution remains the sticking point. Vanuatu’s Climate Change Minister, Ralph Regenvanu, was typically forthright, telling the media that Australia was <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/australia-not-doing-enough-vanuatu/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">“not doing enough”</a> and must end fossil fuel expansion.</p>
<p>He spoke on the day Australia’s new environmental regulator <a href="https://australianminingreview.com.au/news/nepa-greenlights-bmas-saraji-extension-to-2055/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">approved an extension of the BHP Mitsubishi Alliance’s Saraji coal mine</a> to 2055, its first coal approval since it began operating on July 1, and by the <a href="https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/resources/albanese-governments-fossil-fuel-approvals/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Climate Council’s count</a> the 37th fossil fuel project approved since Labor took office in 2022.</p>
<p>The Chinese missile, <a href="https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/australia/2026/australia-260903-australia-pm01.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fired from a submarine</a>, <a href="https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/pacific-islands-forum-statement-on-chinese-ballistic-missile-test/pq71exzgy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">crossed the exclusive economic zones</a> of several Forum members, including the Federated States of Micronesia, <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-30/nauru-officially-changes-name-to-naoero/106978670" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Naoero (formerly Nauru)</a> and Kiribati, before coming down near the Kiribati-Tuvalu boundary.</p>
<p>Leaders “registered concern” and called for at least 24 hours’ notice of future tests from all states, presumably including the United States, though neither China nor the US is named.</p>
<p>But with Kiribati absent from the retreat and Naoero’s President, David Adeang, dissociating his country from the paragraph in a footnote, the consensus was undermined. Naoero, which switched recognition to Beijing in 2024, was the sole formal dissenter among the 18 members.</p>
<p>There was some movement on West Papua. Prodded by the <a href="https://msgsec.info/wp-content/uploads/DG_Statements/MSGCaucusPalau2026/MSG-Caucus-Decisions-Summary-31-August-2026-Koror.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG)</a>, the PIF agreed to facilitate a dialogue with Indonesia and a mission of “interested Leaders”, destination unstated, in consultation with the MSG Secretariat, <a href="https://fijisun.com.fj/news/pacific/rabuka-marape-to-lead-pacific-mission-on-west-papua-human-rights" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reporting back in 2027</a>.</p>
<p>The Forum’s envoys, <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/52nd%20Pacific%20Islands%20Forum%20Communique%2020231109.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">appointed in 2023</a>, Fiji’s Sitiveni Rabuka and PNG’s James Marape, are to press Indonesia on the long-sought visit by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, <a href="https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/indonesia" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the invitation for which was originally extended by Indonesia in 2018</a> but still not granted.</p>
<p><strong>Indonesia may face &#8216;review&#8217;</strong><br />
The MSG wants the visit by 31 December 2026, when Indonesia’s presidency of the UN Human Rights Council ends, or it will <a href="https://pacific.scoop.co.nz/2026/09/melanesian-countries-to-review-indonesias-status-at-msg-if-no-action-on-west-papua-visit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">review Indonesia’s associate member status</a> at its 2027 summit.</p>
<p>Leaders also <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/09/04/pacific-leaders-step-up-climate-and-disaster-push-ahead-of-cop31-approve-renewable-energy-commissioner-as-climate-push-intensifies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">approved terms of reference</a> for a Renewable Energy Commissioner, <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/52nd%20Pacific%20Islands%20Forum%20Communique%2020231109.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">first agreed in 2023</a>, to sit within the <a href="https://www.spc.int/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific Community (SPC)</a> with dual reporting to SPC and the Forum Secretariat, funded by an initial <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/pacific-collaboration-climate-and-renewable-energy-powers-ahead" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">A$1.89 million from Australia</a>. Once appointed, the commissioner is to advocate for investment in renewables and coordinate the push towards 100 percent renewables, cutting dependence on imported diesel.</p>
<p>AI and digital sovereignty formally joined the regional agenda with the endorsement of the <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/08/14/pacific-ministers-back-ai-rules-and-safer-digital-spaces-as-connectivity-expands/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific Digital and Artificial Intelligence Technology Principles</a>, “the Pacific’s first collective regional position on artificial intelligence”, which will inform a governance framework in 2027.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/09/04/pacific-leaders-put-women-at-centre-of-climate-action/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific Pact on Gender and Climate Action</a> is also new, committing governments to strengthen women’s representation in climate delegations, ministerial portfolios and governance bodies. Asked at the final press conference how that would happen with only one female leader among the Forum’s 18 members (Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine), after some confused looks, PIF chair <a href="https://forumsec.org/forum-leaders/he-surangel-whipps-jr" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Surangel Whipps</a> said Palau was traditionally a matrilineal society where the women “<a href="https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2026/09/04/women-hold-power-in-palau-but-remain-outnumbered-at-the-pacific-leaders-table/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">decide who’s chief</a>“, and predicted that “a new woman president is not far away”. (When Whipps invoked the influence of leaders’ wives, Luxon said, “That’s not the same, mate”.)</p>
<p>The closing press conference also exposed issues yet to reach the leaders’ agenda, none of them in the communiqué: a growing HIV crisis, which <a href="https://fijisun.com.fj/news/pacific/groups-question-pacific-leaders-silence-on-hiv" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">civil society groups complained</a> was left off the health agenda; the future of Bougainville as it moves towards independence from Papua New Guinea; and the <a href="https://www.islapublic.org/news/2026-09-01/guams-governor-calls-for-full-membership-in-pacific-islands-forum" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ambitions of Guam and American Samoa</a>, associate members since 2024, for full membership despite their status as US territories.</p>
<p>The next PIFLM will be held in New Zealand in 2027, and the one after that in Naoero, the missile-testing dissenter, followed by Marshall Islands in 2029, Vanuatu in 2030 and French Polynesia in 2031.</p>
<p>Whether the intervening 12 months produce action on the commitments made in Koror, or another communiqué heavy on reaffirming and light on tasking, remains to be seen.</p>
<p><a href="https://devpolicy.org/author/tess-newton-cain/"><em>Dr Tess Newton Cain</em></a><em> is an Associate of the Development Policy Centre and an adjunct Associate Professor at the Griffith Asia Institute. <a href="https://devpolicy.org/author/stefan-armbruster/">Stefan Armbruster</a> is an award-winning journalist with 30+ years experience covering Australia and the Pacific. Formerly head of news (Pacific) at RFA/BenarNews and SBS correspondent; previously with BBC, ABC, Dow Jones and CNBC. This article is republished from ANU&#8217;s <a href="https://devpolicy.org/">Development Policy Blog</a> under Creative Commons.</em></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A landmark UN report says the world will overshoot the 1.5°C climate target. What happens now?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/09/a-landmark-un-report-says-the-world-will-overshoot-the-1-5c-climate-target-what-happens-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate-boosted disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Nino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food shortages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaciers melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific climate action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rising sea level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surangel Whipps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildfires]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Jacqueline Peel and Wesley Morgan For more than a decade, the world has been trying to limit global warming to 1.5°C. That’s no longer possible, according to a new United Nations report. We will likely pass 1.5°C in 2030. That’s not good news for anyone, least of all Australia and New Zealand’s Pacific ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By <span class="fn author-name">Jacqueline Peel and</span> Wesley Morgan</em></p>
<p>For more than a decade, the world has been trying to limit global warming to 1.5°C.</p>
<p>That’s no longer possible, according to a new United Nations <a href="https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/49857">report</a>. We will likely pass 1.5°C in 2030. That’s not good news for anyone, least of all Australia and New Zealand’s Pacific Island neighbours who face <a href="https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-analysis-shows-irreversible-sea-level-rise-for-pacific-islands/">rapidly rising seas</a>.</p>
<p>In response to the report, Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jr said:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is hard to overstate the depth of emotion for those of us living on the frontline after having fought so hard to put the 1.5 degree limit at the heart of the Paris Agreement […] calls for greater ambition are no longer enough — we need to see an urgent and unprecedented increase in political will and investment in a climate safe future</p></blockquote>
<p>READ MORE:</p>
<p>The small silver lining is that it’s still possible for this to be a temporary overshoot of the target. If nations redouble their efforts to phase out fossil fuels and reduce other sources of emissions, they could <a href="https://zerocarbon-analytics.org/science/beyond-1-5c-what-the-science-says-about-overshoot-and-what-comes-next/">limit</a> peak warming to 1.8°C and then use carbon removal methods to bring temperatures back to 1.5°C or below this century.</p>
<p>In 2026, the world is already <a href="https://www.politico.eu/article/global-warming-1-4-celsius-climate-change-copernicus/">about 1.4°C</a> warmer than pre-industrial levels, and the damage and death toll from climate-boosted disasters is <a href="https://www.undrr.org/gar/gar2025">ramping up</a>.</p>
<p>The United Kingdom is warning of <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/aug/25/uk-to-warn-citizens-to-stock-up-on-food-amid-threat-from-climate-crisis-and-hostile-states">possible food shortages</a> amid a historic drought. Wildfires hit new areas in <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj638jx0l53o">France and Spain</a>, while glaciers are <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00777-z">melting rapidly</a> and the oceans are at their <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-25/ocean-temperatures-hit-record-spurred-by-el-ni%C3%B1o/107073982">hottest level</a> on record. The <a href="https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/el-nino-explainer/index.html">enormous El Niño event</a> emerging in the Pacific is likely to bring <a href="https://theconversation.com/how-will-this-years-record-breaking-el-nino-affect-nz-and-the-world-5-things-to-know-290159">major disruption</a>.</p>
<p>Every fraction of a degree makes things worse.</p>
<p>There are <a href="https://theconversation.com/overshooting-1-5-c-even-temporary-warming-above-globally-agreed-temperature-limit-could-have-permanent-consequences-255523">no good outcomes</a> if we remain above 1.5°C. Urgent cuts to emissions and efforts to protect the most vulnerable are our best remaining options. Failure to do so risks irreversible harm.</p>
<figure style="width: 754px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/757404/original/file-20260902-50-5x68cn.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.1&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="Sandbars and low river level in the Danube River, Romania" width="754" height="503" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Major European rivers are at record low levels this year, threatening trade, power plants and farming . . . Pictured: the Danube River in southeastern Romania on August 5. Image: Xinhua News Agency/Getty</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Why does 1.5°C matter so much?<br />
</strong>The 2015 <a href="https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement">Paris Agreement</a> established a shared goal for the world: keep the rise in global average temperatures above pre-industrial levels “well below” 2°C and “pursue efforts” to hold warming to 1.5°C.</p>
<p>This goal was set based on <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/">expert scientific assessments</a> that warming of more than 2°C would be dangerous and that limiting warming to 1.5°C was necessary to minimise climate risks.</p>
<p>Pacific nations fought hard to include 1.5°C in the agreement, arguing it was essential for their communities to “<a href="https://theconversation.com/glasgow-showdown-pacific-islands-demand-global-leaders-bring-action-not-excuses-to-un-summit-169649">stay alive</a>” in the face of rising sea levels and other climate-fuelled threats.</p>
<p>Last year, the world’s top court &#8212; the International Court of Justice &#8212; <a href="https://theconversation.com/worlds-highest-court-issues-groundbreaking-ruling-for-climate-action-heres-what-it-means-for-australia-261842">ruled</a> that 1.5°C is the <a href="https://www.icj-cij.org/case/187">primary temperature limit</a> nations have committed to work towards.</p>
<p>This ruling means that if governments fail to act as ambitiously as they can, they could be sued in international courts.</p>
<p>In May this year, a majority of nations voted in the UN General Assembly <a href="https://press.un.org/en/2026/ga12760.doc.htm">to endorse</a> the court’s ruling and urge action to keep to 1.5°C.</p>
<p><strong>It’s not time to give up<br />
</strong>Warming of 1.5°C will be bad. But 1.6°C will be worse, and 1.7°C worse again. Every increase will bring more extreme weather, more loss of nature, more loss of land to the sea and more harm to humans.</p>
<p>If we stay over 1.5°C, we risk triggering climate tipping points &#8212; sudden shifts which cannot be undone on human timescales. These include the Greenland and West Antarctic <a href="https://nsidc.org/learn/parts-cryosphere/ice-sheets/why-ice-sheets-matter">ice sheets</a> melting, the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/28/collapse-critical-atlantic-current-amoc-no-longer-low-likelihood-study">collapse</a> of crucial heat-distributing currents in the Atlantic Ocean or the Amazon rainforest becoming a <a href="https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/en-pm-amazon-rainforest-turned-into-carbon-source">source of emissions</a>.</p>
<p>Overshooting 1.5°C doesn’t mean it’s time to throw out the Paris Agreement. It is not working fast enough, but it is working.</p>
<p>Solar power and electric vehicles have boomed and <a href="https://www.iea.org/news/global-electricity-demand-growth-set-to-accelerate-as-power-systems-adjust-to-recent-shocks">electrification has accelerated</a>. Nations have cut emissions enough to avoid the <a href="https://theconversation.com/scientists-have-scrapped-the-worst-case-climate-scenario-because-action-is-making-a-difference-283675">worst climate futures</a> of a 3°C rise or even higher.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="https://climateactiontracker.org/global/historical-progress/">Climate Action Tracker</a>, the Paris Agreement has averted the equivalent of 1°C of warming. Rather than hitting 3.6°C by 2100, the world is on track for 2.6°C.</p>
<p>While this is progress, it is not enough. Global emissions are <a href="https://climatetrace.org/news/climate-trace-data-show-marginal-increase-in-global-emissions-in-the-first-half-of-2026">plateauing</a>, but have still not begun to fall in earnest.</p>
<p>As damage from climate change mounts, leaders must do the work and begin rapidly cutting emissions to keep the goal of net-zero by 2050 alive.</p>
<p>To get temperatures back under 1.5°C, we will also need to pull gigatonnes of carbon dioxide back out of the atmosphere using tree planting and nature restoration. We may also need technological approaches such as rock weathering or ocean alkalinity enhancement, though these are not proven at scale and can come with other risks.</p>
<figure style="width: 754px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/757408/original/file-20260902-50-t19jov.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.1&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="Wind turbine and coal plant seen at a distance" width="754" height="503" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">There has been progress on climate change since 2015 – but not enough. Image: acilo/Getty</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>We are all in this together<br />
</strong>It may seem as if climate action faces impossible headwinds, as populism surges and the current United States administration <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-us-has-struck-a-deal-to-control-venezuelas-oil-reserves-it-probably-wont-help-bring-down-fuel-prices-290847">doubles down</a> on fossil fuels.</p>
<p>It is worth looking beyond these headlines. It took almost 70 years for the world to install a terawatt of solar power, but then just two years for the second and another two for the <a href="https://e360.yale.edu/digest/three-terawatts-solar">third terawatt</a>. In ten years, that figure will likely have tripled. Developing nations are <a href="https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/the-ev-leapfrog-how-emerging-markets-are-driving-a-global-ev-boom/">moving rapidly</a> to take up non-polluting electric transport.</p>
<p>Climate change can no longer be ignored. As damage mounts, nations will have to cooperate to cut emissions as rapidly as possible and figure out how to safely and equitably pull carbon back out of the atmosphere.</p>
<p>Action depends on strong political will, inclusive governance, and finance to help developing countries cut emissions and adapt.</p>
<p>In November, Australia will <a href="https://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/international-climate-action/unfccc-cop/cop31">lead negotiations</a> at the next international climate summit, COP31, in Turkey. Leaders and diplomats will work to <a href="https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/news/belem-mission-1-5-help-shape-global-climate-action">keep 1.5°C in reach</a> &#8212; even after overshoot. Australia can point to its own rapid <a href="https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/news-resources/clean-energy-australia-report-2026">clean energy transition</a> and urge others to set clear pathways to go electric &#8212; and <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/australia-endorses-ambitious-new-global-electrification-target-to-hasten-exit-from-fossil-fuels/">wean themselves</a> off the production and use of fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Climate change has been described as a <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0">super wicked problem</a> &#8212; big, complex and impossible to solve simply. The solution is to see the urgency of the issue and act cooperatively to tackle it.</p>
<p>If we make it a problem for the next generation, there may be no way back to a safe climate.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/jacqueline-peel-8356">Dr Jacqueline Peel</a> is professor of law, The University of Melbourne; <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/wesley-morgan-1280881">Dr Wesley Morgan</a> is research associate, Institute for Climate Risk and Response, University of New South Wales. Republished from The Conversation under Creative Commons.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Māori and Pacific soldiers&#8217; final resting place in Gaza &#8211; don&#8217;t forget their story</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/07/maori-and-pacific-soldiers-final-resting-place-in-gaza-dont-forget-their-story/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 11:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth War Graves Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First World War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza war cemetery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graves desecration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maher Nazzal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Māori Pioneer Battalion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine Forum of New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rarotongan soldiers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Maher Nazzal of the Palestine Forum of New Zealand There is a deeply painful connection between Aotearoa New Zealand and the Gaza War Cemetery that deserves to be remembered. Long before the current destruction of Gaza, New Zealand soldiers fought and died in the Palestine campaign of the First World War. Some never ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Maher Nazzal of the Palestine Forum of New Zealand<br />
</em></p>
<p>There is a deeply painful connection between Aotearoa New Zealand and the Gaza War Cemetery that deserves to be remembered.</p>
<p>Long before the current destruction of Gaza, New Zealand soldiers fought and died in the Palestine campaign of the First World War. Some never made it home. Their final resting place is Gaza.</p>
<p>Among those buried at the Gaza War Cemetery are Private Kamati and Private Tutavake, two soldiers associated with the New Zealand Māori Pioneer Battalion&#8217;s Rarotongan contingent. New Zealand historical reporting has described them as members of the Māori Battalion.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+war+graves+desecration"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Gaza war graves desecration reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>They are not simply names on a distant memorial.</p>
<p>They were young men from the Pacific who travelled thousands of kilometres from their homes to serve in a war that brought them to Palestine. They became part of the history of Aotearoa, the Pacific and the Middle East &#8212; and Gaza became their final resting place.</p>
<p>Today, that cemetery itself has been caught up in another war.</p>
<p><strong>A cemetery caught in the destruction of Gaza<br />
</strong>The Gaza War Cemetery contains more than 3000 Commonwealth graves from the First World War, together with graves from the Second World War and other conflicts. The New Zealand War Graves Project records 32 New Zealand casualties at the cemetery, including Kamati and Tutavake.</p>
<p>In February 2026, reports emerged that sections of the cemetery had been bulldozed and damaged.</p>
<p>The <i>New Zealand Herald</i> reported that the destroyed section contained 20 New Zealand and two Rarotongan soldiers. Satellite imagery showed parts of the cemetery&#8217;s previously green grounds turned into churned earth.</p>
<p>The damage was serious enough for the New Zealand government to publicly express its concern.</p>
<figure id="attachment_123618" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-123618" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-123618" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide.png" alt="New Zealand silent over the cemetery desecration" width="680" height="542" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide-300x239.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide-527x420.png 527w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-123618" class="wp-caption-text">New Zealand silent over the desecration . . . graves of unknown soldiers at the Gaza war cemetery in 2009 &#8211; 14 years before Israel&#8217;s war on Gaza and &#8220;systemic destruction&#8221; of the war cemetery. Image: The Guardian screenshot/Riyaah/wiki commons</figcaption></figure>
<p>The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand was “deeply concerned” about damage to the Gaza War Cemetery and the nearby Deir el-Balah War Cemetery, describing them as the final resting places of New Zealanders who died in the two world wars.</p>
<p>New Zealand&#8217;s ambassador to Israel raised the matter directly with the Israeli government, conveying New Zealand&#8217;s expectation that the graves of New Zealand, Pacific and Commonwealth service personnel be treated with the utmost respect.</p>
<p>The Commonwealth War Graves Commission has committed to restoring the cemeteries when it is safe and practical to do so.</p>
<figure id="attachment_133199" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133199" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-133199" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Gaza-War-Cemetery-ABC-680wide.png" alt="A series of images produced by Canadian geospatial firm SkyWatch shows the Gaza War Cemetery and its surrounds have been heavily damaged" width="680" height="382" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Gaza-War-Cemetery-ABC-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Gaza-War-Cemetery-ABC-680wide-300x169.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133199" class="wp-caption-text">A series of images produced by Canadian geospatial firm SkyWatch shows the Gaza War Cemetery and its surrounds have been heavily damaged by military bulldozers . . . The Commonwealth War Graves site in Deir al Balah, Gaza, in August 2023 (left) and the same site in July 2024. Image: ABC</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Their story is bigger than a cemetery<br />
</strong>There is something profoundly symbolic about this.</p>
<p>These Pacific soldiers left their islands and travelled to a part of the world they had never known. They fought and died in Palestine more than a century ago.</p>
<p>Their graves subsequently became part of Gaza&#8217;s landscape.</p>
<p>For generations, the cemetery was cared for by Palestinian caretakers. New Zealanders visiting Gaza on Anzac Day came to remember their countrymen. A 2014 <i>New Zealand Herald</i> account described the cemetery as a place where New Zealanders came to honour the fallen.</p>
<p>And then Gaza became a battlefield again.</p>
<p>The people living around the cemetery today are experiencing a war of their own &#8212; while the men buried beneath the ground have, once again, been caught in the violence of a conflict in Palestine.</p>
<p>That is the tragedy of Gaza&#8217;s war graves.</p>
<p><strong>Aotearoa should remember them<br />
</strong>For New Zealanders, this should not be an abstract international story.</p>
<p>The men buried there were part of our history.</p>
<p>They represented New Zealand and the Pacific at a time when Māori and Pacific soldiers made enormous sacrifices during the First World War.</p>
<p>The story of Kamati and Tutavake also reminds us that the history of New Zealand&#8217;s military service is not exclusively a European story. It includes Māori, Cook Islanders and other Pacific peoples whose contribution and sacrifice helped shape the history of Aotearoa.</p>
<p>Their graves in Gaza are physical links between Aotearoa, the Pacific and Palestine.</p>
<p>And that makes their treatment today especially painful.</p>
<p>Whatever one&#8217;s position on the present conflict, the principle should be straightforward:</p>
<p><strong>Respect for the war graves</strong><br />
War graves must be respected. The dead should not become casualties of the wars of the living.</p>
<p>More than a century after these soldiers died, their final resting place should be a place of peace.</p>
<p>Kamati and Tutavake deserve to be remembered not only as soldiers who died in Palestine, but as Pacific men whose lives became part of the shared history of Aotearoa, the Pacific and Gaza.</p>
<p>Their names remain.</p>
<p>Their graves remain.</p>
<p>And their story should not be forgotten.</p>
<p><em>Maher Nazzal is chair of the Palestine Forum of New Zealand.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>West Papua: The Pacific’s new test of Indonesia’s sovereignty narrative</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/07/west-papua-the-pacifics-new-test-of-indonesias-sovereignty-narrative/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 23:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Papua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanesian Spearhead Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OHCHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Islands Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN High Commissioner for Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Human Rights Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Papua human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Papua self-determination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Ali Mirin The 55th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ Meeting in Koror, Palau, last week has pushed West Papua back to the centre of Pacific diplomacy. At an Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) caucus held on the margins of the Forum, leaders reaffirmed their longstanding call for the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Ali Mirin</em></p>
<p>The 55th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ Meeting in Koror, Palau, last week has pushed West Papua back to the centre of Pacific diplomacy.</p>
<p>At an Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) caucus held on the margins of the Forum, leaders reaffirmed their longstanding call for the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to visit the West Papuan provinces.</p>
<p>They urged Jakarta to facilitate the visit before 31 December 2026, the end of Indonesia’s term as president of the UN Human Rights Council.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/04/un-human-rights-commissioner-visit-to-west-papua-on-track-says-indonesia/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> UN human rights commissioner visit to West Papua on track, says Indonesia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=West+Papua">Other West Papua reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_133160" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133160" style="width: 206px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-133160 size-medium" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall-206x300.png" alt=" Ali Mirin" width="206" height="300" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall-206x300.png 206w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall-288x420.png 288w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 206px) 100vw, 206px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133160" class="wp-caption-text">Author Ali Mirin . . . &#8220;Indonesia&#8217;s sovereignty may be internationally recognised, but sovereignty should never become a shield against legitimate human rights scrutiny.&#8221; Image: APR</figcaption></figure>
<p>Crucially, the MSG said that if the requested steps were not undertaken, Indonesia’s associate member status would be reviewed at the 2027 MSG Summit.</p>
<p>The question is whether Jakarta is willing to allow independent international observers to see, hear, and assess conditions in West Papua?</p>
<p><strong>Sovereignty cannot be the end of the conversation</strong><br />
For decades, Indonesia has relied heavily on sovereignty and territorial integrity when responding to international criticism of West Papua.</p>
<p>Jakarta maintains that Papua is an integral part of Indonesia and that its political status was settled through the international arrangements culminating in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Free_Choice">1969 Act of Free Choice</a>.</p>
<p>From this perspective, calls for international intervention can be portrayed as challenges to Indonesia’s territorial integrity and interference in its domestic affairs.</p>
<p>But sovereignty and accountability are not mutually exclusive. Recognition of territorial sovereignty does not eliminate a state&#8217;s responsibility for human rights. Nor does it prevent international organisations from seeking access to investigate allegations of abuses.</p>
<p><strong>The unresolved legacy of 1969</strong><br />
Indonesia&#8217;s sovereignty argument also rests heavily on history. Under the 1962 New York Agreement between Indonesia and the Netherlands, administration of West New Guinea was temporarily transferred to the United Nations before being transferred to Indonesia.</p>
<p>The agreement envisaged an act of self-determination before the end of 1969.</p>
<p>Rather than a territory-wide referendum involving universal and direct participation by the adult population, the process involved representative councils. UN records state that 1026 members of the enlarged representative councils were asked to express the population&#8217;s choice, and all chose continued association with Indonesia.</p>
<p>The UN General Assembly subsequently adopted Resolution 2504, taking note of the Secretary-General&#8217;s report and the agreement concerning West New Guinea.</p>
<p>The dispute, therefore, is not whether the 1969 process occurred. It clearly did. The deeper question is whether it represented a genuinely free expression of the political will of West Papuans.</p>
<p>This historical disagreement remains politically powerful because the competing narratives have never been reconciled.</p>
<p>For Jakarta, 1969 closed the question of sovereignty. For many West Papuans, it remains evidence that their political aspirations were never freely tested.</p>
<p>But contemporary Pacific diplomacy should not become trapped entirely in this historical dispute. Even if one accepts Indonesia&#8217;s present sovereignty over Papua, contemporary human rights questions remain legitimate.</p>
<p><strong>Indonesia&#8217;s anti-colonial rhetoric</strong><br />
There is also an uncomfortable contradiction in Indonesia&#8217;s international rhetoric.</p>
<p>Indonesia has historically presented itself as an anti-colonial state and a supporter of the principle that peoples should be free from colonial domination.</p>
<p>At the UN Pacific Regional Seminar on Decolonisation in Bali in 2023, then-Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi stated that “independence is the inalienable right of all nations” and argued that colonialism must be abolished.</p>
<p>Indonesia&#8217;s response is that West Papua is not a colonial territory and that its political status was settled through an internationally recognised process.</p>
<p>That is a legitimate position for Indonesia to defend. But the political question remains: if self-determination is a universal principle, how should it be applied when Indigenous Papuans continue to challenge the political circumstances under which integration occurred?</p>
<p><strong>Jakarta&#8217;s &#8216;right path&#8217; needs a destination</strong><br />
Indonesia has responded by insisting that the proposed UN visit is progressing and is “on the right path.” Yet the phrase raises more questions than it answers.</p>
<p><em>What does “the right path” actually mean?</em></p>
<p><em>When will the visit occur?</em></p>
<p><em>Will UN officials have freedom of movement?</em></p>
<p><em>Will they be able to speak privately with Indigenous communities?</em></p>
<p><em>Will they meet civil-society organisations, church leaders, victims, local officials and political representatives?</em></p>
<p><em>Will they be able to visit areas affected by military operations and displacement?</em></p>
<p><em>And will their findings be published without political interference?</em></p>
<p>These are not unreasonable demands. They are the minimum conditions necessary for an assessment to have credibility.</p>
<p>If Jakarta is confident that conditions in Papua have improved, an independent UN assessment could actually strengthen Indonesia&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>Transparency is not necessarily a threat to sovereignty. In fact, it can reinforce legitimacy.</p>
<p><strong>Why the MSG decision matters</strong><br />
The MSG is uniquely placed in this debate because West Papua is not merely a distant foreign policy issue for Melanesian governments.</p>
<p>West Papuans are Indigenous Melanesians, and the MSG was established to strengthen political, economic, and cultural cooperation among Melanesian peoples.</p>
<p>Indonesia&#8217;s associate membership has therefore always contained a political tension.</p>
<p>Jakarta seeks recognition and legitimacy within an organisation representing Melanesian interests, while some MSG members continue to raise concerns about the rights and welfare of Indigenous Melanesians inside Indonesia.</p>
<p>The organisation has not abandoned dialogue. Fiji has made clear that engagement with Jakarta remains necessary. But dialogue without measurable outcomes risks becoming a diplomatic holding pattern.</p>
<p>The proposed OHCHR visit provides a practical benchmark. The MSG has effectively placed a deadline on the issue. That changes the diplomatic calculation. Jakarta is no longer responding only to general statements of concern; it is responding to a specific request accompanied by a potential institutional consequence.</p>
<p><strong>The Pacific is testing itself</strong><br />
Pacific governments increasingly speak of a regional order grounded in Indigenous rights, human security, climate justice and self-determination. They insist that Pacific priorities should not simply be dictated by larger external powers.</p>
<p>West Papua therefore presents a difficult consistency test. At the same time, Pacific diplomacy must avoid reducing every disagreement with Indonesia to a confrontation over sovereignty. Indonesia is too important to the region for that approach to be strategically sustainable.</p>
<p>The better approach is precisely what the MSG appears to be attempting: engagement combined with accountability.</p>
<p><strong>A new phase in the West Papua debate</strong><br />
The significance of Koror is therefore not that the Pacific has suddenly endorsed West Papuan independence. Nor has the MSG decided to remove Indonesia. What has changed is the political language.</p>
<p>The debate is shifting from the binary question of “Indonesia or independence” towards the more immediate question of “sovereignty and accountability”.</p>
<p>That shift creates political space for Pacific governments to demand transparency without having to settle the final status question first. It also places greater responsibility on Jakarta.</p>
<p>Indonesia has spent decades defending its sovereignty over West Papua. It now has an opportunity to demonstrate that sovereignty is compatible with transparency.</p>
<p>The coming months will determine whether the Koror decision becomes another diplomatic statement or a genuine turning point.</p>
<p>For West Papuans, this is not merely a diplomatic dispute. It concerns whether their experiences can be independently heard and investigated.</p>
<p>For the MSG, it is a test of whether Melanesian solidarity has practical meaning.</p>
<p>For the Pacific Islands Forum, it is a test of whether its principles apply consistently.</p>
<p>For Indonesia, it is a test of whether sovereignty can coexist with scrutiny.</p>
<p>And for the United Nations, it is a test of whether international human rights mechanisms can gain meaningful access to one of the Pacific&#8217;s most enduring political disputes.</p>
<p>Indonesia&#8217;s sovereignty may be internationally recognised, but sovereignty should never become a shield against legitimate human rights scrutiny.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Ali+Mirin">Ali Mirin</a> is a West Papuan academic and writer from the Kimyal tribe of the highlands bordering the Star Mountains region of Papua New Guinea. He holds a Master of Arts in International Relations from Flinders University in Adelaide, South Australia.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student newspaper wins lawsuit against Trump’s crackdown on pro-Palestine speech</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/07/student-newspaper-wins-lawsuit-against-trumps-crackdown-on-pro-palestine-speech/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 23:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkiye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rümeysa Öztürk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tufts University]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Democracy Now! AMY GOODMAN: A federal judge has ruled the Trump administration has violated the constitutional rights of international students in seeking to deport them for their pro-Palestinian activism and criticism of Israel. In her ruling, US District Judge Noël Wise wrote, “In the United States, free speech, including the freedom to criticise the government ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.democracynow.org/"><em>Democracy Now!</em></a></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: A federal judge has ruled the Trump administration has violated the constitutional rights of international students in seeking to deport them for their pro-Palestinian activism and criticism of Israel. </em></p>
<p><em>In her ruling, US District Judge Noël Wise wrote, “In the United States, free speech, including the freedom to criticise the government and its leaders, is not a sign of our democracy’s fragility. It is evidence of its strength. That strength is diminished when members of our society &#8212; citizens and noncitizens alike &#8212; must self-censor and &#8216;behave&#8217; or suffer the government’s retaliation.”<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>The lawsuit was filed by </em><strong>The Stanford Daily</strong><em>, the student newspaper at Stanford University, which claimed some of its writers on student visas declined to cover pro-Palestinian protests or report on topics related to Israel, fearing deportation. </em></p>
<p><em>Student journalists also requested their published articles on such topics be removed from the paper’s website.</em></p>
<p><em>The case raises broader questions about the climate of fear and political repression facing international students during the Trump administration. One of the most striking examples is Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University. </em></p>
<p><em>Last year, masked plainclothes immigration agents snatched Öztürk off the streets of Somerville, Massachusetts. A year earlier, she had co-written an <a href="https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj">opinion piece</a> for the Tufts student newspaper, </em>The Tufts Daily<em>, critical of the university’s response to campus protests over Gaza and the school’s failure to uphold student Senate resolutions on Palestine. </em></p>
<p><em>Tufts University later stated the op-ed did not violate university policy, that no complaints had been filed about it, and that Rümeysa Öztürk had been in good academic and immigration standing. </em></p>
<p><em>Nonetheless, her student visa was canceled, and she spent more than six weeks in an ICE jail in Louisiana. An immigration court eventually ruled in Rümeysa’s favor, saying the government failed to meet its burden of proof to deport her.</em></p>
<p><em>However, the message from the Trump administration to international students across the nation remained clear: Their ordinarily protected free political expression could now potentially cost them their immigration status and their freedom.</em></p>
<p><em>Well, for more, we’re joined by two guests who successfully challenged the Trump administration in court. Here in New York City, George Porteous is with us, editor-in-chief of </em>The Stanford Daily<em>. And in Moorestown, New Jersey, Will Creeley, legal director of FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which represented </em>The Stanford Daily<em> in court.</em></p>
<p><em>George and Will, we welcome you both to </em>Democracy Now! <em>Let’s begin with you, George Porteous. You are a rising senior &#8212;<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> Senior, yeah.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: &#8212; at Stanford. You’re the editor-in-chief of the paper. Talk about why you brought this suit. What were the student reporters saying to you, the international students?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> Thank you for having me.</p>
<p>And what we were hearing from the noncitizens in our newsroom and from noncitizens across campus &#8212; current students, former students, alumni &#8212; was that they were genuinely frightened because of what they saw in the headlines, what they saw happen to Rümeysa Öztürk.</p>
<p>They were understandably frightened that if they reported the news, even if they weren’t writing an op-ed, even if they were just covering a protest or a vigil, if they put their name on a byline, they were frightened that they were going to lose their visa.</p>
<p>And so, what we said is, we can’t function as a newspaper if we don’t have these voices included in our newspaper. So, we filed suit, and last week the judge gave us a favorable ruling.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a2_U20mLSuc?si=HrnSgfcseJke8JyH" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Stanford Daily student press wins free speech lawsuit.    Video: Democracy Now!</em></p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ:</em> <em>And, George, what was the initial response of the Stanford administration to your lawsuit? Did they &#8212; did they support your efforts?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> You know, the administration has remained relatively silent about this suit. We still haven’t heard any response from them since this decision. And we’re an independent organisation, so this was a suit filed by The Stanford Daily on our own, independently. And that’s really why we were in this case, not really because of the university.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And what has this all taught you in terms of the ability of folks to stand up and defend the First Amendment?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS: </em>Well, I think what it’s shown me is that it really has to begin locally, because we were dealing with a problem inside of our newsroom with our peers, and this was about solidarity, and also just the practical need to continue doing our jobs and to continue reporting the news.</p>
<p>So, it’s shown me that it really does begin with everyday people. It begins with students, too. Students, I think, have enormous power to stand up to what this administration has done in terms of civil liberties and constitutional rights. And we have real power, is what this ruling has shown us.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: And are other students who have previously said they’re not going to cover a protest &#8212; are they willing to now? Has this made a difference, changed the climate in your newsroom?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS: </em>You know, it’s still, I think, too early to see. But I’m hopeful that this ruling, because it’s a very strong legal precedent, will carve out more room for noncitizens to feel that they can participate in democracy on campus.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Will Creeley, you are legal director at FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Talk about why you approached </em>The Stanford Daily<em>, why this is such a significant decision.</em></p>
<p><em>WILL CREELEY:</em> Well, it’s an honour to be here, Amy and Juan.</p>
<p>And I’m so proud listening to George now expound upon the importance of folks like George and his predecessor, Greta, standing up for First Amendment rights. It’s extremely important. When you see Rümeysa Öztürk in prison orange from a detention center in Louisiana for co-authoring an op-ed, you know something has gone terribly wrong.</p>
<p>With this administration, again and again, the chill is the point. These actions that they’re taking, these wanton violations of the First Amendment, are designed to get folks like George and his colleagues at <em>The Stanford Daily</em> to feel scared, to think twice, to ask that their names not appear on news reporting or opinion pieces.</p>
<p>That’s flatly un-American.</p>
<p>So, it was extremely important to us to fight back. And we’re so grateful for the bravery of <em>The Stanford Daily</em> folks and our Jane Doe colleague &#8212; Jane Doe plaintiff, who was a member of Students for Justice in Palestine and was no longer going to protest or flying a Palestinian flag or wearing shirts that expressed her political opinions.</p>
<p>She self-censored because of what the administration was doing. That’s a First Amendment violation every day of the week. It’s flatly un-American. And that’s why we’re very proud of last week’s victory.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Will, some members of the Trump administration responded. Stephen Miller posted on X, “A district court judge says America must admit and keep foreigners who hate America and hate Americans. Court-ordered civilisational suicide. It will not stand.” </em></p>
<p><em>Your response? And also the issue that you —</em></p>
<p><em>WILL CREELEY:</em> Yeah.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: If you could talk a little bit about the due process question you raised?</em></p>
<p><em>WILL CREELEY: </em>Stephen Miller has got it exactly backwards. In the year 1800, Thomas Jefferson, in his inaugural address, made clear that in this country we protect the First Amendment rights of even those who call for the dissolution of this country, responding to the Alien and Sedition Acts.</p>
<p>We have a long history in this country of protecting that speech. That’s what makes this country special. We have to live those values. It’s Stephen Miller who’s un-American here, not folks who are expressing their political opinions.</p>
<p>The United States is supposed to be where folks from around the world, folks like Rümeysa Öztürk, Mohsen Mahdawi, Mahmoud Khalil, can come and learn about what it means to be able to speak out without fear of a midnight knock on the door or being whisked away by masked federal agents.</p>
<p>We’re going to continue fighting for those fundamental American rights, no matter who’s in office.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Well, we’re going to be talking about people being whisked away by federal agents in a moment when we go to Danbury, Connecticut. I want to thank you both for being with us, and just ask you, as you go into your senior year, George: What are you majoring in?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> I’m a history major.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: So, what have you learned?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> Well, history repeats itself. And I think what we’ve seen is this administration has a clear agenda. They’re trying to instill fear on campuses. And they’ve done lasting damage. I mean, this lawsuit is a victory, but a lot of damage has already been done.</p>
<p>So, I think what I’ve learned is that we have a responsibility, especially as students. We have an opportunity to continue standing up for our peers, because when the most vulnerable among us is afraid to speak, we should all be deeply concerned.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: George Porteous, editor-in-chief of </em>The Stanford Daily<em>. Will Creeley, legal director at FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</em></p>
<p><em>Republished from Democracy Now! under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shane te Pou: Matua Pita Tipene, I wish you weren’t in Israel right now</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/05/shane-te-pou-matua-pita-tipene-i-wish-you-werent-in-israel-right-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanitarian catastrophe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral consistency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pita Tipene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane Te Pou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OPEN LETTER IN THE DAILY BLOG: By Shane te Pou Tēnā koe, Te Rangatira Matua Pita Tipene, I’ve met you several times over the years and have always respected you. You have struck me as thoughtful, considered and serious about rangatiratanga with a genuine concern for the people you serve. I have seen you as ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OPEN LETTER IN <a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/"><em>THE DAILY BLOG</em></a>:</strong> <em>By Shane te Pou</em></p>
<p><em>Tēnā koe, Te Rangatira</em></p>
<p>Matua Pita Tipene, I’ve met you several times over the years and have always respected you. You have struck me as thoughtful, considered and serious about rangatiratanga with a genuine concern for the people you serve. I have seen you as an island of calmness surrounded by a sea of madness.</p>
<p>That is why I struggle with the fact that you are in Israel right now.</p>
<p>I know you have said that you want to see for yourself what is happening rather than rely only on the media. I also know that you have spoken about paying homage to our tūpuna of the 28th Māori Battalion who fought and died in that part of the world.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/4/us-rejects-israeli-suggestions-of-removing-palestinians-from-gaza"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> US rejects Israeli suggestions of removing Palestinians from Gaza</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/4/israeli-police-kill-palestinian-in-jerusalem-as-army-blocks-aid-for-qusra">Israeli police kill Palestinian in Jerusalem as army blocks aid for Qusra</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide">Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But I have to be honest, Pita: I do not understand either of those reasons for being there at this particular moment. Whatever the intention, I struggle to see how travelling to Israel now is the right thing to do, given what is happening in Gaza.</p>
<p>This is not an ordinary time to visit Israel. A humanitarian catastrophe is unfolding in real time.</p>
<p>Hamas must be condemned. I condemn the attacks of October 7, the killing of Israeli civilians and the taking of hostages. Nothing justifies those actions. But condemning Hamas does not require us to suspend our moral judgment about Israel’s response.</p>
<p>Nothing that happened on October 7 justifies the killing of Palestinian civilians, the destruction of homes and essential infrastructure, the displacement of communities or the denial of basic necessities.</p>
<p>I’m not really a stats man but here is one that we must collectively mourn upon nearly 22,000 Palestinian children killed from October 7th 2023 to February 2026.</p>
<figure id="attachment_133095" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133095" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-133095 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Join-us-Global-March-for-Peace-Oct-10-300wide.png" alt="A Global March for Palestine - including Aotearoa New Zealand" width="300" height="395" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Join-us-Global-March-for-Peace-Oct-10-300wide.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Join-us-Global-March-for-Peace-Oct-10-300wide-228x300.png 228w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133095" class="wp-caption-text">A Global March for Palestine &#8211; including Aotearoa New Zealand &#8211; is planned for October 10. Image: APR</figcaption></figure>
<p>By God’s mercy alone, the death threat has slowed down but hear this Matua since your arrival in Israel 12 children have died</p>
<p>As Māori, our history should make us particularly sensitive to what happens when a powerful state exercises authority over another people. We know dispossession, the loss of whenua and the experience of having our history contested or told by those with greater political and military power.</p>
<p>That is why I think about Ngāti Hine. Your people have a proud history of standing with those seeking self-determination &#8212; from Ireland and South Africa to Kanaky.</p>
<p>Nelson Mandela understood that principle clearly. He recognised that South Africa’s freedom was incomplete without the freedom of Palestinians. His position was not a rejection of Jewish people or Israel’s security; it was a recognition that opposition to oppression must be applied consistently.</p>
<p>Many Māori see something familiar in the Palestinian experience. That does not mean supporting Hamas, excusing the killing of Israeli civilians or disregarding the safety of Jewish people. We can condemn all of those things while still insisting that Palestinian lives and rights matter equally.</p>
<p>Pita, you have copped a lot of online abuse. I understand people’s outrage, but I’m not going to add to it. I believe you are a reasonable person, and I believe these are issues we should be able to sit down and talk through. I would much rather have that conversation than contribute to the abuse being directed at you.</p>
<p>But I also think you need to be prepared for what happens when you come home. Your absence and your actions have upset a lot of people, including people within your own community, and many will be deeply disappointed.</p>
<p>People will also want to know whether the trip was privately funded and, if so, by whom. The reality is that, as a leader, you face a great level of scrutiny.</p>
<p>Seeing for yourself matters. But so does what we do with what we see.</p>
<p>For me, the principle is simple: nothing justifies the killing of civilians, wherever they live and whoever they are. Palestinian lives are not worth less than Israeli lives, and the security of one people cannot be built on the suffering of another.</p>
<p>You have always seemed to me to be a thoughtful man, Pita. That is why I hope you will reflect deeply on what you have seen, what you have heard and what our whakapapa asks of us.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/author/shane-te-pou/">Shane te Pou</a> is a political commentator and Māori broadcaster and he writes a political analysis column for The Daily Blog. This article is republished from TDB with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nepali Times: Not if, but when next?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/04/nepali-times-not-if-but-when-next/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avalanche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate loss and damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood catastrophe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacial lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaciers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Langtang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lhende Khola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepali Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN climate summits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Nepali Times No one could have predicted this disaster would happen when it did, but we all knew it would happen one day. As this paper went to press last Thursday afternoon, the unimaginable scale of the Central Nepal flood catastrophe was becoming apparent. With every notice about a bank branch that lost all ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EDITORIAL:</strong> <a href="https://nepalitimes.com/"><em>Nepali Times</em></a></p>
<p>No one could have predicted this disaster would happen when it did, but we all knew it would happen one day.</p>
<p>As this paper went to press last Thursday afternoon, the unimaginable scale of the Central Nepal flood catastrophe was becoming apparent. With every notice about a bank branch that lost all its staff, a police station without a single survivor, buses full of Janai Purnima pilgrims swept away, and phone calls to this office from Indian families asking to locate their loved ones &#8212; we have had to come to terms with the tragically high cost in human lives.</p>
<p>Not since the 2015 earthquake has Nepal seen a disaster of this magnitude. In terms of economic damage to infrastructure and property, it is the worst in this country’s history. Remote sensing has enabled us to pinpoint the location of the avalanche on the north face of Langtang in Nepal that blocked the Lhende Khola which flows into the Trisuli in Nepal and which burst last Wednesday morning just before 9 am.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/3/rescue-efforts-continue-as-nepal-china-flood-death-toll-surpasses-1270"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Rescue efforts continue as Nepal-China flood death toll surpasses 1270</a></li>
<li><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/temporary-burial-for-nepal-china-flood-victims">Temporary burial for flood victims in Nepal</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/27/nepal-tibet-floods-what-happened-what-caused-them-and-who-is-missing">Nepal-Tibet floods: What happened, what caused them and who is missing?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/27/satellite-images-show-destruction-from-nepal-tibet-floods">Other Nepal-China flood reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_133046" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133046" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-133046 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Nepali-Times-logo-300wide.png" alt="NEPALI TIMES" width="300" height="129" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133046" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/"><strong>NEPALI TIMES</strong></a></figcaption></figure>
<p>The debris flow at Timure on the border was nearly 80m high, and as the flood raced downstream it swept everything in its path. It spared nothing.</p>
<p>No one could have predicted this disaster would happen when it did. But anyone could have said it was bound to happen one day. In this newspaper, we ourselves have frequently reminded policy makers about the need to prepare for floods unleashed by extreme weather, glacial lake outburst floods, and transboundary climate calamities.</p>
<p>We said that after the Barun Khola flood of 2017, after the Melamchi disaster of 2021, and after the Teesta flood in Sikkim that swept away a $1 billion dam, we wrote in this space about lessons for Nepal’s own hydroelectric plants on the Arun, Marsyangdi and Trisuli. And the Bhote Kosi flood on July 8 last year was another alarm bell.</p>
<p><strong>Strategy for survival<br />
</strong>Arguing that this is not a problem we created, that we need to be compensated for historical carbon emissions, is for speeches at UN climate summits. There is no money coming for Loss and Damage. We are in this on our own, we have to craft our own strategy for survival.</p>
<p>This was not a &#8220;natural&#8221; disaster. Nothing about it was natural &#8212; not the glacier melting due to greenhouse gas buildup due to fossil fuel burning, not the location of expensive hydropower plants on trans-Himalayan rivers, not designing highways to follow rivers, not the settlements that have grown around them, not the corruption and greed, not the poor governance.</p>
<p>Our ancestors knew not to live next to Himalayan rivers. Nepal’s townships used to be located along high ridgelines, and floodplains were only used to grow food or grind grain. Bridges were temporary, and designed to be rebuilt after monsoon floods washed them away.</p>
<p>Economic desperation, outmigration from rural areas and proximity to roads have pushed people to settle along river banks &#8212; despite full knowledge of the risks. Hazard mapping of settlements along river banks enforced by local governments could have saved many lives last week.</p>
<p>Early warning will be of no help if homes are located right next to rivers flowing down from the world’s youngest and most seismically-active mountain range, now feeling the full impact of the climate crisis.</p>
<p>We have repeated this ad nauseum after every disaster: let us not put all our eggs in one basket. Instead of taking huge loans to invest in cascades of expensive hydroelectric plants on trans-Himalayan rivers, Nepal should opt for smaller projects across the country and spread the risk.</p>
<p>In one fell swoop on Wednesday morning, Nepal lost 440MW from 12 hydroelectric plants &#8212; 10 percent of the country’s total generation capacity. Transmission lines and substations located along the river corridor were destroyed.</p>
<p>A culture of fatalism can explain the lack of interest in preparedness for disaster that we know will happen, and with greater frequency in future. But that is no excuse. Even if previous governments ignored this, Nepal’s new administration with its technocrats and PhDs must take measures to address seismic and climate co-hazards.</p>
<p>Winston Churchill once said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” This disaster also offers the chance for Prime Minister Balendra Shah and his government to demonstrate a proactive approach in search, rescue, rehabilitation and a preparedness strategy for the future.</p>
<p>We should not need a disaster to remind us to be prepared. By then it is too late for many people, as it tragically was this week. We failed to learn our lessons once again. This period of national mourning calls for Nepalis to be united, to show the same spirit of compassion and generosity that we saw in 2015.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/author/sonia-awale">Sonia Awale</a>, editor of the <a href="https://nepalitimes.com/">Nepali Times</a>. First published on 27 August 2026 and republished under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minerals, military strategy draw the eye of Trump to isolated atoll and its 230 people</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/03/minerals-military-strategy-draw-the-eye-of-trump-to-isolated-atoll-and-its-230-people/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 06:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palau-Belau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belt and road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook Islands News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral airstrip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Penrhyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Missionary Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Islands Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penrhyn Atoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second World War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tongareva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Milne Isolation has been a challenge for the people of the atoll of Tongareva, 1300km north of the Cook Islands capital on Rarotonga. Distance has made it difficult for the 230 residents to get supplies, or to travel for school and work. There are no scheduled flights; a ship visits every two ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Jonathan Milne</em></p>
<p>Isolation has been a challenge for the people of the atoll of Tongareva, 1300km north of the Cook Islands capital on Rarotonga.</p>
<p>Distance has made it difficult for the 230 residents to get supplies, or to travel for school and work. There are no scheduled flights; a ship visits every two months.</p>
<p>But isolation hasn’t been their greatest enemy; arguably, it’s engagement with the outside world that’s done them more harm. Ever since the crew of a passing English sailing ship, the <em>Lady Penrhyn</em>, dubbed the island Penrhyn in 1788, the people have suffered the colonial ambitions of distant empires.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/03/pacific-islands-forum-should-outside-nations-be-allowed-at-the-leaders-summit/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Pacific Islands Forum: Should outside nations be allowed at the leaders’ summit?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/02/us-expected-to-announce-major-fuel-security-deal-at-pacific-islands-forum/">US expected to announce major fuel security deal at Pacific Islands Forum</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/02/pacific-leaders-urged-to-be-united-behind-2050-climate-action-vision/">Pacific leaders urged to be united behind 2050 climate action vision</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/01/us-pushes-critical-minerals-agenda-in-cook-islands-with-penrhyn-lifeline/">US pushes critical minerals agenda in Cook Islands with Penrhyn ‘lifeline’</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Pacific+Islands+Forum">Other PIF reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Missionaries brought new rules suppressing the language and faith and traditional cultural practices. Sailors brought disease that harmed the people and the plants.</p>
<p>An imported coconut blight led to a catastrophic famine that nearly depopulated the island.</p>
<p>The grimmest tragedy was in the 1860s, when London Missionary Society pastors sold 472 islanders for about five silver dollars a head, as slaves to Peru.</p>
<p>They boarded the Spanish and Peruvian ships with a promise of good pay and a safe return. It was a lie. Most died in exile.</p>
<p><strong>Considering history</strong><br />
Islanders will be quietly considering that history, after news this week that the United States and New Zealand governments will invest $102 million in building a new deepwater port on the atoll, potentially providing a staging post for overseas naval vessels.</p>
<figure style="width: 780px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://i0.wp.com/newsroom.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/DSC05443-scaled.jpg?resize=780%2C519&amp;ssl=1" alt="New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters (from left), Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown and the US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau" width="780" height="519" data-recalc-dims="1" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Either the flags or the politicians got mixed up, as New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters, Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown and the US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau signed a $102 million deal this week to build a new deepwater port. Image: Sam Sachdeva/Newsroom</figcaption></figure>
<p>This is not new; the atoll was home to a US base in the Second World War. American GIs built port infrastructure and a 3000m crushed coral airstrip there.</p>
<p>It became a stopping point for the big Catalina flying boats; stripped hulks of American bombers still sit on the atoll as physical scars of the war. Children grew up who never knew their fathers &#8212; an emotional scar of the war.</p>
<p>There has long been talk &#8212; some supportive, some opposed &#8212; of a deepwater port in Tongareva’s big 233 sq km lagoon, reportedly 90m at its deepest point. Rarotonga businessman Charles Pitt argued in 2009 that the Americans should build commercial interests there, to give them a strategic position between China’s interests to the west in Sāmoa, and French Polynesia to the east.</p>
<p>Pitt warned that Chinese fishing interests were planning to open a business on Penrhyn &#8212; and it was always that potential for Chinese involvement that motivated the greatest concern in US-aligned countries.</p>
<p>In 2018, when I was editing the <em>Sunday Star-Times,</em> we reported on the front page that Cook Islands and Niue had “blindsided” NZ Foreign Minister Winston Peters by signing up to China’s belt and road infrastructure lending scheme, and that there was talk of Beijing financing a deepwater port on Penrhyn.</p>
<p>It was a possibility that some in the islands would have welcomed, as I discovered when our family moved to the Cooks the following year. Henry Puna, the long-serving PM, told me the US had picked up and gone at the end of the war, and never really returned.</p>
<p>China had been “very present” in the Pacific.</p>
<p><strong>America&#8217;s return &#8216;welcome&#8217;</strong><br />
“Unfortunately for a long time, America has not been,” Puna mused. “We would welcome America’s return.”</p>
<p>This all explains why US-aligned Winston Peters (on his return as foreign minister) reacted so angrily last year to Puna’s protegé and successor, Mark Brown, going to Beijing to sign a strategic partnership with China.</p>
<p>Accusing Brown and his officials of a lack of transparency, Peters cut $30 million core development support to the Cook Islands government, impacting on some basic health, education and tourism services.</p>
<p>Now, things have changed. The Cooks government had told me they would welcome America’s return. Well, this week they got it.</p>
<p>The announcement of the construction of a new port on Tongareva has been welcomed by the atoll’s MP, Vaine Wichman, who told the <em><a href="https://www.cookislandsnews.com/internal/national/local/outer-islands/economy/penrhyn-hails-101-million-port-upgrade-backed-by-us-and-nz/">Cook Islands News</a></em> it’s a “landmark investment”.</p>
<figure style="width: 712px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://i0.wp.com/newsroom.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/tongareva-port.jpeg?resize=712%2C400&amp;ssl=1" alt="What remains of the Tongareva port that American GIs built 80 years ago" width="712" height="400" data-recalc-dims="1" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">What remains of the port that American GIs built 80 years ago, when 1000 of them were stationed on Tongareva during the Second World War. Image: Julie Taripo/Radio Cook Islands/Newsroom</figcaption></figure>
<p>“Over 80 years after the wartime presence of US forces in Penrhyn, this investment is both historically symbolic and economically transformative,” she says. “Penrhyn was once part of the Pacific’s strategic defence network, and today this partnership reaffirms this.”</p>
<p>It comes just a week after the arrival of a new $5 million government-procured interisland passenger and cargo vessel, offering the hope of better, safer, more secure connectivity to all the remote outer islands.</p>
<p><strong>A Peters &#8216;triumph&#8217;</strong><br />
Some see this as a political triumph for the mercurial Peters in the final weeks of his term as foreign minister; after playing hardball, he dragged the Cooks away from the influence of Beijing.</p>
<p>Others see it as a power play by Mark Brown, who has won the interest and investment of the world’s most powerful nation.</p>
<p>Most of all, none can ignore the opportunity this offers the Trump Administration &#8212; the strategic chance to be able to dock and stage operations from the centre of the vast Pacific basin. And ensuring China can’t.</p>
<p>Moreover, back in February, I reported that MFAT Chief Executive Bede Corry and his diplomats had discussed critical minerals developments with both the US and the Cook Islands. That’s now borne fruit for the White House.</p>
<p>Because this week’s deal opens the door (or the channel) to the $1 billion US-owned American Ocean Minerals Corp and Odyssey Marine Exploration, which agreed to merge this year.</p>
<p>And to Cook Islands Investment Corp’s new partnership with US firm Wetstone to fund offshore mineral exploration. It gives US firms first dibs on what I’ve described as the most lucrative treasure trove of undersea critical minerals in the EEZ of any country in the world.</p>
<p>Yet amid the political back-slapping, some Tongareva locals sound a note of caution. On the atoll’s Facebook group, administrator Ula Tini warns the US and China are readying for conflict &#8212; and the atoll has now been drawn into it.</p>
<p><strong>Tongareva &#8216;been here before&#8217;</strong><br />
“Tongareva has been here before,” he says. “Our ancestors witnessed aircraft, military personnel and major infrastructure arriving on an island that much of the world probably knew very little about.”</p>
<p>Isolation, he agrees, has been one of the atoll’s biggest challenges. This port could help.</p>
<p>“But our people should still ask the hard questions… Could the facilities have future strategic or defence uses? How many jobs and business opportunities will actually go to Tongarevans? What environmental protections will be put in place for our lagoon, reef and marine resources?”</p>
<p>Tini wants his children and grandchildren to inherit more than a new port. That means ensuring that this time, the small community engages with the world on its own terms.</p>
<p>“What is Tongareva’s place in the future of the Pacific — and are we ready for it?”</p>
<p><em><a href="https://newsroom.co.nz/author/jonathan-milne/">Jonathan Milne</a> is managing editor of <a href="https://newsroom.co.nz/">Newsroom</a> and a former editor of the Cook Islands News. This analysis was first published by Newsroom and is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The British state has lost the argument, even as it rigs the trials of genocide opponents</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/03/the-british-state-has-lost-the-argument-even-as-it-rigs-the-trials-of-genocide-opponents/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contempt of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Establishment media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political defendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Show trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Greenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial by jury]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a stinging rebuke to the judge, the jury members unanimously acquitted Tony Greenstein after just two hours of deliberation. As it turned out, it was not Greenstein on trial; it was British justice, writes Jonathan Cook. ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook The British state rigged the trial of Tony Greenstein, a secular Jewish socialist and ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In a stinging rebuke to the judge, the jury members unanimously acquitted Tony Greenstein after just two hours of deliberation. As it turned out, it was not Greenstein on trial; it was British justice, writes <strong>Jonathan Cook</strong>.<br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Jonathan Cook</em></p>
<div><picture><source type="image/webp" /></picture></div>
<p>The British state rigged the trial of Tony Greenstein, a secular Jewish socialist and peace activist, to get him locked up for as much as 14 years &#8212; supposedly for “inviting support for Hamas”.</p>
<p>Fearful that the judge would punish his barrister for delivering a closing speech that properly defended him, Greenstein instead spoke directly to the jury.</p>
<p>For half an hour, he <a href="https://greghadfield.medium.com/tony-greenstein-the-most-important-half-hour-of-my-life-d03f7877a492">picked apart</a> sham charges relating to three social media posts and a blog article he wrote against Israel’s genocide in Gaza.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>In doing so, he exposed the proceedings as a political show trial &#8212; one of a growing number, designed to silence opposition both to Israel’s genocide in Gaza and to the British state’s complicity in it.</p>
<p>In summing up, Judge Sarah Plaschkes said she had considered referring Greenstein for contempt of court. But instead she dismissed his eloquent, damning address to the jury as a “rambling speech delivered by an old man”.</p>
<p>At that point, presumably, she had no idea what impact Greenstein’s words would have on the jury.</p>
<p>In a stinging rebuke to the judge, the jury members unanimously acquitted him after just two hours of deliberation. As it turned out, it was not Greenstein on trial; it was British justice.</p>
<p><strong>Hearing all the facts</strong><br />
Once given a chance to hear all the facts, not just the ones curated by the Crown, the jury accepted Greenstein’s arguments, including his accusation that the judiciary were readily conniving in the growing authoritarianism unleashed by the UK state’s complicity in genocide.</p>
<p>Which may explain why Greenstein’s landmark victory in a case with huge implications for free speech &#8212; and the right to speak out on the British state’s partnership in Israel’s genocide &#8212; was almost entirely ignored by the establishment media.</p>
<p>Had the jury found against him, you can be sure that same media would have covered the matter extensively, playing its part in sending a message to audiences that they should keep their heads down and avoid showing any solidarity with the Palestinian people or risk sharing Greenstein’s fate.</p>
<p>His acquittal, and the British state’s humiliation, was not a message the state &#8212; or the billionaire-owned media &#8212; wanted publicised.</p>
<p>What Greenstein’s closing speech managed to do was introduce something the British state and its judiciary have been carefully trying to strip out of the current wave of show trials of anti-genocide activists: important context.</p>
<p>Greenstein had to dismiss his barrister for the closing speech because, had the barrister spoken to the jury as Greenstein himself did, he would have most likely shared the fate of another distinguished lawyer, Rajiv Menon KC.</p>
<p>Menon is facing contempt of court proceedings over his masterful closing speech in the trial of six Palestine Action defendants, who were charged with multiple and serious crimes over their efforts to destroy killer-drones produced at a factory in Bristol operated by Israel’s biggest arms maker, Elbit Systems.</p>
<p><strong>Refusal to convict</strong><br />
As a result of Menon’s speech &#8212; you can read the most important passages <a href="https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/barristers-powerful-speech-at-filton">here</a> &#8212; the jury refused to convict any of the defendants of any of the offences for which the state had put them on trial.</p>
<p>The judge in that case, Jeremy Johnson, was so eager to make an example of Menon &#8212; and intimidate other lawyers so they would be dissuaded from giving other Palestine solidarity activists a proper defence &#8212; that he managed to abuse the established legal procedure specifically designed for contempt of court referrals.</p>
<p>The Court of Appeal had to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/may/12/palestine-action-trial-lawyer-wins-appeal-contempt-court-charge">overturn</a> his decision, though it allowed him to reapply for contempt proceedings against Menon, this time using the proper channels. Johnson <a href="https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-action-lawyer-faces-renewed-contempt-proceedings/">did so</a>.</p>
<p>The point is that judges like Johnson and Plaschkes &#8212; faithful servants not of justice but of the British state &#8212; know that no jury will convict activists trying to to stop a genocide if it is framed in those terms. So these judges must rig these trials to keep the jury as ignorant as possible of the relevant context: that the British state is persecuting peace activists for embarrassing it over its collusion in genocide.</p>
<p>That fact was, once again, only too evident during Greenstein’s trial.</p>
<p>Plaschkes was angry throughout the proceedings at Greenstein’s efforts to introduce context to the case. For the prosecution to succeed, she needed the jury to ignore many relevant things about Greenstein’s supposedly “Hamas-supporting” comment about a “ghetto uprising” in Gaza:</p>
<ul>
<li>the context that the one-day breakout from Gaza on 7 October 2023 was a direct response to Israel’s preceding 16-year blockade of Gaza, denying its 2.3 million-strong population the <a href="https://electronicintifada.net/content/israels-starvation-diet-gaza/11810">essentials of life</a> and turning the enclave effectively into a concentration camp;</li>
<li>the context that, following the October 2023 breakout, Israel immediately launched a genocidal campaign of destruction against the enclave’s infrastructure and its civilian population;</li>
<li>the context that, as a secular socialist, Greenstein has been a long-time critic of Hamas, as proven by a stream of articles he has written over more than a decade and that he cited to the jury;</li>
<li>the context that, as the son of Holocaust survivors, he is deeply opposed to one people systematically oppressing another – all the more so given that Jewish Zionists have exploited their people’s historic victimhood to justify Israel committing contemporary crimes against Palestinians;</li>
<li>the context of international law, which states that a people under occupation, the Palestinians, have a right to resist their oppression by Israel, including through the use of violence;</li>
<li>the context that Greenstein had not even mentioned Hamas in posts that were the focus of the trial, or indicated any support for it – only his support for the right in law for Palestinians to resist Israeli crimes;</li>
<li>the context that the British government proscribed the political wing of Hamas under the UK’s terrorism laws only in 2021, not based any new “terror” behaviour – in fact, four years earlier Hamas had <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/01/hamas-new-charter-palestine-israel-1967-borders">rewritten its charter</a>, showing a strong willingness to make concessions to Israel. No, the purpose of proscription was specifically to advance Israel’s goal of intimidating popular, international solidarity with the people of Gaza;</li>
<li>the context that, in prosecuting Greenstein, the British government is destroying the very basis of the right to free speech, all to advance the interests of the demonstrably genocidal state of Israel;</li>
<li>the context that the British state is not some dispassionate arbiter of justice in these prosecutions: it is aggressively colluding in Israel’s crimes. Its huge conflict of interest in silencing critics is the elephant in the room.</li>
</ul>
<p>Greenstein told the jury:</p>
<blockquote><p>Your [verdict] will not stay in this room. If these three posts are terrorism, then the word has a new meaning for everyone in this country. Every student who shares an article. Every pensioner who retweets the wrong opinion. Every writer, every blogger, every one of your neighbours with a social media account and a view about a war.</p>
<p>Can it really be the law of England that any of them – that any of you – will be condemned to 14 years of prison for a tweet? You have the power, today, to answer that question. Whatever your answer is, it will be remembered long after this trial is forgotten.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Masterclass speech</strong><br />
The whole speech is a masterclass in how to speak over the head of a complicit judiciary and prick the conscience of people who still have a moral backbone. I recommend you read it <a href="https://greghadfield.medium.com/tony-greenstein-the-most-important-half-hour-of-my-life-d03f7877a492">in full here</a>.</p>
<p>The British government desperately wanted the scalp of a Jewish activist to show that no one is safe from the state’s long arm of persecution. It failed, which should be cause for relief and celebration among every person who opposes authoritarianism.</p>
<p>The defeats being handed to the British state by juries who hear the actual evidence are adding to the pressures on officials to find new ways to bypass the ancient right of trial by jury.</p>
<p>The government of Keir Starmer was determined to establish the precedent of <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c989p51r7xjo">scrapping</a> jury trials. Faced with the unpopularity of such a move, his successor Andy Burnham has sounded hesitant about advancing the measure. But pledges he made while seeking the Labour leadership &#8212; and prime ministership &#8212; are proving to be worth little now that he is in office.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, courtier-judges like Johnson are finding ways to get around the reluctance of juries to convict anti-genocide activists of serious crimes.</p>
<p>Juries that convict activists of a relatively minor charge of criminal damage for smashing up killer-drones, assuming the defendants will get a few months in prison, are learning that they are thereby handing judges in these trials unlimited powers, in violation of the most basic principles of justice.</p>
<p>After the verdict, judges like Johnson are choosing to rewrite the charge sheet, adding retrospectively what they are bogusly calling a “<a href="https://www.amnesty.org.uk/latest/uk-terrorist-sentence-for-palestine-action-activist-marks-dangerous-move-against-right-to-protest/">terrorism connection</a>”. That means they can sentence the defendants as “terrorists”, leading to far longer jail sentences and destroying the defendants’ lives in perpetuity.</p>
<p><strong>Mark of a justice system</strong><br />
This is the mark of a justice system that no longer cares about evidence, fairness or jury verdicts. It cares only about visible punishment, about spreading terror through the courtroom.</p>
<p>We can fight back. Juries appear to be growing increasingly wary of these highly politicised trials the British state is staging to exonerate itself of its criminal activities and lock up its critics. As judges increasingly abuse the justice system to get the jail sentences demanded by the state, juries are likely to become much less willing to serve as an alibi for state repression.</p>
<p>This is no longer a struggle simply for the Palestinian people’s survival. It is a struggle for ourselves, for our right to have a voice, to have some say in how our societies are run and for whose benefit. It is a struggle to keep the forces of darkness at bay a little while longer.</p>
<p>And it is a battle none of us can afford to lose.</p>
<p><em><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><a href="https://twitter.com/jonathan_k_cook/">Jonathan Cook</a> is a writer, journalist and self-appointed media critic and author of many books about Palestine. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. This article is republished from the <a href="https://jonathancook.substack.com/">author’s Substack</a> with permission.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six months on, Iran is still standing but survival is becoming more costly</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/28/six-months-on-iran-is-still-standing-but-survival-is-becoming-more-costly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12-Day War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assassinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Fury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masoud Pezeshkian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maximun pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mojtaba Khamenei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Economic Outcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow fleet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six months mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Israel attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Mahjoob Zweiri It has been six months since the United States and Israel launched their coordinated military campaign against Iran on February 28. The war is easily cast as the latest turn in the long antagonism between Washington and Tehran, but that frame misses its immediate context. Its real context is the aftermath ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Mahjoob Zweiri</em></p>
<p>It has been six months since the United States and Israel launched their coordinated military campaign against Iran on February 28. The war is easily cast as the latest turn in the long antagonism between Washington and Tehran, but that frame misses its immediate context.</p>
<p>Its real context is the aftermath of October 7, 2023: Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza that followed spread across the region, wore down Iran’s network of allies, and pulled Israel and Iran into increasing confrontation, culminating in the 12-day war of June 2025 and the US-Israel campaign launched last February.</p>
<p>The bilateral track only sharpened this trajectory. Nearly eight years before the current war, Trump’s first administration launched “maximum pressure” aimed at driving Iran’s oil exports to zero.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/8/28/iran-war-live-tehran-prepares-conditions-to-open-strait-of-hormuz"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Iran to draft conditions to open Hormuz following mediator requests</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">Other War on Iran reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>When it failed to force political change, economic coercion eventually gave way to military force. Six months on, the campaign has come full circle, back to economic pressure applied with greater force. Economics, then war, then economics again.</p>
<p>At the 100-day mark, Tehran could plausibly present the outcome as a victory of survival: Its adversaries had failed to topple the system, and by its own measure that was what mattered.</p>
<p>Six months on, that claim is harder to sustain because the pressure has shifted to the terrain on which Iran has always been weakest. The question is no longer whether Iran can survive military attack, but whether it can withstand an economic siege with no sign of lifting.</p>
<p><strong>A leadership hollowed out at the top<br />
</strong>The most visible change is at the summit. After the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the opening strike, his son Mojtaba was appointed just more than a week later, a succession Tehran presented as proof of continuity and cohesion.</p>
<p>But six months on, he has yet to make a verified public appearance. His portrait is carried through city squares and at mourning ceremonies, and decrees are issued in his name, while rumours about his condition persist.</p>
<p>A leadership that once drew its authority from the visible presence of a single figure now rests, in part, on an absence.</p>
<p>The state has also had to rebuild its command structure in the middle of the war. The opening strike killed IRGC commander Mohammad Pakpour and armed forces chief-of-staff Abdolrahim Mousavi, while other senior commanders were slain in the weeks that followed.</p>
<p>On August 10, decrees issued in Mojtaba’s name formalised a new military leadership, including Ahmad Vahidi as IRGC chief and Ali Abdollahi as chief-of-staff.</p>
<p>The appointments appear to favour loyalty and continuity over change and were widely read as a signal that Tehran did not intend to soften its posture. The deeper significance is simpler: A state still rebuilding its high command in the sixth month of a war is not doing so from a position of strength.</p>
<p><strong>From maximum pressure to ‘Economic Outcast’<br />
</strong>The clearest sign that the war has returned to its economic origins is the campaign Washington has intensified since suspending strikes in early August. US officials had already branded the broader effort “Economic Fury”; on August 24, the Treasury launched Operation Economic Outcast, an expanded campaign aimed at severing Iran’s remaining financial links with the outside world.</p>
<p>Its instruments are familiar from the pre-war “maximum pressure” era but are being applied more aggressively: Secondary sanctions on those moving Iranian oil, measures against its “shadow fleet” and financial networks, and greater enforcement of international sanctions.</p>
<p>Iran’s oil exports, near 1.8 million barrels a day before the war, have fallen to below half a million; inflation is approaching 90 percent, with food prices more than double what they were a year ago.</p>
<p>Yet the siege lands on an economy whose troubles were never solely the work of sanctions.</p>
<p>Iran had long failed to insulate itself from an architecture built over decades, from US sanctions dating to the 1980s to United Nations Security Council resolutions since 2006.</p>
<p>Neither the 25-year, $400 billion partnership with China nor the strategic treaty signed with Russia in early 2025 delivered the stability Tehran sought. Before the war, Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian had acknowledged that sanctions alone could not account for the depth of the crisis and that governance bore its share.</p>
<p>The economic weapon works in part because the state it targets was already structurally exposed.</p>
<p>That pressure is now enforced at sea. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation on February 28 and, six months on, it has not reopened; the naval blockade that followed has fused with the closure into a single chokehold on Iran’s trade.</p>
<p><strong>Diverging narratives in Tehran<br />
</strong>That structural exposure is forcing a longstanding divergence into the open. For years, Iran’s leadership has explained its crises through two competing narratives: One, advanced by the political leadership, acknowledging failures of economic governance; the other, promoted by the security establishment, attributing unrest to external enemies.</p>
<p>Under the pressure of the siege, that divergence has sharpened into a disagreement over the war itself. President Pezeshkian, who signed the June memorandum with Washington, has spoken with growing candour about an economy giving way, saying this month that Iran’s difficulties have “multiplied several times over” as revenue has fallen.</p>
<p>On August 21, he argued that it would be “better to end [the war] today, while we are in a position of strength”, even as his government prepared Iranians for painful increases in fuel prices.</p>
<p>Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has put the danger more bluntly: “No matter how much military power we have, if the people are hungry and there is no financial circulation, economic growth, or national production, we will not endure.”</p>
<p>Yet he remains tied to the security establishment’s logic, insisting diplomacy carries weight only when backed by readiness for war and casting Washington’s economic turn as an admission of military failure.</p>
<p>That Iran’s two most senior civilian figures now say publicly that hunger, not bombardment, is the greatest threat marks a shift from the confident rhetoric of the war’s first months. It has not settled the argument over who is responsible, only raised its stakes.</p>
<p>Six months on, Iran’s leadership still measures the war by the standard it set at the outset: The system has not fallen, and everything else it considers recoverable. By that measure, survival remains a form of victory.</p>
<p><strong>Pressure now falls on household</strong><br />
But the pressure now falls on the household and the market, where it is harder to answer with the language of resistance. The divide between a president urging an end to the war and a security establishment determined to outlast it is no longer concealed.</p>
<p>The war has also produced the terms of its own possible end. The closed strait and the blockade have become the centre of gravity for diplomacy. Reopening the strait and lifting the blockade are the levers each side holds over the other and the most plausible opening for negotiations that could bring the conflict to a close.</p>
<p>This leaves Iran with a difficult choice. To negotiate a settlement on terms Washington would accept risks provoking the internal fracture the hardliners fear; to hold out risks a bleeding economy and a winter that will test the state’s capacity to provide.</p>
<p>The war has also reinforced, within parts of the leadership, the conviction that only a nuclear capability could have deterred the initial attack, making any lasting settlement harder to reach.</p>
<p>Beneath these immediate pressures lies a more enduring pattern. The confrontation between Washington and Tehran has always been, at its core, a contest shaped by what the political elites of the two countries believe about each other and about the risks of dealing with each other.</p>
<p>On the Iranian side, US hostility has repeatedly deepened divisions within the political elite rather than compelling agreement, reinforcing its reluctance to make bold decisions about negotiating with the US.</p>
<p>Pressure intended to force Tehran’s hand has instead hardened the hesitation it sought to break, compounding Iran’s political and economic strains.</p>
<p>Six months into this war, that pattern is again on display: the campaign has come full circle to the economic weapon it began with, the Iranian elite is more divided, and the bold decision a settlement would require remains as distant as ever.</p>
<p>There is little sign that this cycle will end soon.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.mzweiri.com/#about">Professor Mahjoob Zweiri</a> is an academic and senior political analyst specialising in Iran and Middle East politics. This article was first published by Al Jazeera and republished under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caitlin Johnstone: All it takes is one crack in the lie we’ve been sold</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/28/caitlin-johnstone-all-it-takes-is-one-crack-in-the-lie-weve-been-sold/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belief systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth-based worldview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncomfortable truths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unravelling thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of lies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone I saw a clip going around from the Netflix series “1899” where a woman discovers a crack in the screen of what she had taken to be her world, causing her entire understanding of reality to crumble before her eyes. Someone had captioned the clip, “Every awakening begins with a fracture ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>I saw a <a href="https://x.com/benwehrman/status/2088479698791629252" target="_blank" rel="noopener">clip going around</a> from the Netflix series “1899” where a woman discovers a crack in the screen of what she had taken to be her world, causing her entire understanding of reality to crumble before her eyes.</p>
<p>Someone had captioned the clip, “Every awakening begins with a fracture in the lie.”</p>
<p>Yeah. It does tend to happen like that.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBRzPgxp9qI" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>LISTEN:</strong> A reading by Tim Foley</a></li>
</ul>
<p>You start pulling on one thread and then the whole thing unravels. Maybe you start with the Iraq war lies. Maybe 9/11. These days for a lot of folks it’s Palestine.</p>
<p>https://youtube.com/shorts/NcCwpbaCW24</p>
<p>You keep pulling on that thread, uncovering more and more uncomfortable truths, until eventually you discover that pretty much everything you’ve been taught about your world was a lie.</p>
<p>Every war. Everything about how your government really operates. Everything you’ve been told about nations and how they work. Everything about capitalism and communism and how your society is structured. It was all lies, fed to you by parents, teachers, preachers, pundits, politicians and news men from the moment you were old enough to process complex thought.</p>
<p>It can feel scary. It can feel like the end of your world, because in a sense that’s exactly what it is. Your sincere pursuit of the truth leads to the unraveling of everything you thought you knew, and you find yourself plunging into a great abyss of uncertainty about what’s real.</p>
<p>And a lot of people do get lost at this juncture. They plunge down too many rabbit holes with too much paranoia and not enough critical thinking, and they wind up replacing all their old indoctrinated belief systems with new beliefs that are just as crazy and power-serving as the first ones. There’s often a gap between letting go of your old worldview and assembling a new one where it’s easy to get confused and misled.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JBRzPgxp9qI?si=udmJe0uRwRh3cAS3" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>But if you remain sincere, careful, relentlessly self-honest and dedicated to the truth while ensuring your critical thinking faculties remain operating at full power, you eventually emerge from this chrysalis phase with the wings of a truth-based worldview. You can now not only see through the old lies, but can understand what’s really going on in the world.</p>
<p>And what’s really going on in the world is a lot less pleasant than the fictions you were fed as a schoolchild. You can see that we are ruled by a transnational alliance of plutocrats and government agencies who manipulate world affairs to maximise their power and profits at the expense of ordinary working people around the globe, and you can see that those same powerful abusers are responsible for constructing the fictional power-serving worldview you just freed yourself from.</p>
<p>And when you see how unpleasant the truth is and how hard you had to work to realise it, you understand why relatively few people have awakened to it. From the perspective of the ego, it’s a whole lot of effort and discomfort without much in the way of payoff. Forming a truth-based worldview is something you do for its own sake, and if you’re not the sort of person who views truth as its own reward, then you’re not the sort of person who’s likely to pursue it.</p>
<p>But more and more people are choosing truth. More and more people are spotting a loose thread labeled “Gaza” or “Epstein” or what have you, and giving it a curious tug. Despite the discomfort, despite the required effort, and despite the great cost of having to sacrifice the world they thought they knew, they’re pulling that thread, and they keep on pulling. We’re seeing it more and more every year.</p>
<p>And that gives me hope. I don’t know where this is headed or whether we win in the end, but I’m seeing enough movement in human consciousness at mass scale to continue holding out hope for a better world.</p>
<p><a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/"><em>Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em> is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include <a href="https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-un-torture-report-on-assange-is-an-indictment-of-our-entire-society-bc7b0a7130a6">The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society</a>. She publishes a website and <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/">Caitlin’s Newsletter</a>. This article is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comedian&#8217;s Australian visa sabotaged, war crimes suspects cheered through</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/27/comedians-visa-sabotaged-war-crimes-suspects-cheered-through/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bassem Youssef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza kill lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli Defence Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael West Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney Harbour Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist Council of NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist military]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Israel lobby has tried to sabotage comic Bassem Youssef from entering Australia while the government gives a free pass to IDF soldiers suspected of war crimes. Andrew Brown writes on the joke that could not enter Australia, and the army that could for Michael West Media. COMMENTARY: By Andrew Brown On Sunday morning, before ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Israel lobby has tried to sabotage comic Bassem Youssef from entering Australia while the government gives a free pass to IDF soldiers suspected of war crimes. Andrew Brown writes on the joke that could not enter Australia, and the army that could for <strong><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/">Michael West Media</a>.</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Andrew Brown</em></p>
<p>On Sunday morning, before the sun is over Sydney Heads, up to 40 current and former soldiers of the Israel &#8220;Defence&#8221; Forces (IDF) will jog across the Sydney Harbour Bridge with numbers pinned to their chests and a cheer squad waiting at the Opera House.</p>
<blockquote><p>On Thursday night in Perth, a stage will be empty.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bassem Youssef will not be on it. Home Affairs wanted an FBI clearance and a criminal record from Egypt, whose generals forced him into exile in 2014. His passport had lapsed.</p>
<p>Cairo took its time. The tour is gone.</p>
<p>Youssef performed here in 2023 and 2015 without a police certificate. He did not change. The lobby did.</p>
<p>In June, Peter Wertheim of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry told <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em> his organisation had gone to Home Affairs to have Youssef kept out.</p>
<p>His stated principle was that anyone with a record of “debased generalisations about entire national or religious communities” should never be granted a visa. Hold that sentence. We will come back to it.</p>
<p>Home Affairs will not say what it did with Wertheim’s request. The paperwork did the job a refusal would have done, and no minister had to sign it.</p>
<p>Now the IDF runners in the Sydney Marathon.</p>
<p>Their trip is paid for by the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council and the Zionist Council of NSW, which calls them a “peace delegation”. They run for the Israeli charity Shalva, and Shalva has published their profiles.</p>
<p><strong>IDF war crimes suspects<br />
</strong>Meet First Lieutenant Roy Oryon. Shalva’s profile says he served as deputy commander of Company B, 13th Battalion, Golani Brigade, through what Israel calls the Swords of Iron War.</p>
<p>He led his men on October 7. Company B lost 18 soldiers that day and he wears 18 flowers tattooed on his skin for them.</p>
<p>The profile does not say where Company B went next. Golani’s 13th Battalion went into Gaza. It is the brigade whose reconnaissance battalion, before dawn on 23 March 2025, fired on a convoy of ambulances outside Rafah for more than five minutes, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/31/israel-killed-15-palestinian-paramedics-and-rescue-workers-one-by-one-says-un">killed 15 medics and rescue workers</a>, then bulldozed the bodies and the crushed vehicles into the sand for eight days.</p>
<p>The IDF’s own inquiry admitted its deputy commander fired on the convoy himself and filed a false report. He was sacked. Nobody was charged.</p>
<p>Meet Oryan Omer. His LinkedIn lists five years in Israeli Military Intelligence to 2020.</p>
<p>Meet Yael Zafarti. Her LinkedIn shows six years in Unit 8200, Israel’s signals intelligence arm, and the title Head of Cyber Security Analysis from April 2024 to January 2026.</p>
<p>Unit 8200 is the unit that <em>+972 Magazine</em> and <em>The Guardian</em> identified as the builder of the artificial intelligence systems that generated Gaza’s kill lists. It is also the unit a Western security source told Reuters helped develop the booby-trapped pagers that exploded across Lebanon on 17-18 September 2024, blinding and maiming more than 3000 people and killing at least 37, two of them children.</p>
<p>Zafarti was running cyber analysis for the unit at the time. She now works as a product manager in Tel Aviv.</p>
<p>These are the people the Zionist Council of NSW is inviting Sydney to applaud over drinks.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">IDF soldiers, including Golani Brigade ex-Gaza, to compete in Sydney Marathon<a href="https://x.com/hashtag/whatsthescam?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#whatsthescam</a> <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/auspol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#auspol</a> <a href="https://t.co/MDISUlp8nT">https://t.co/MDISUlp8nT</a></p>
<p>— <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4a7.png" alt="💧" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />Michael West (@MichaelWestBiz) <a href="https://x.com/MichaelWestBiz/status/2092066484462010475?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 25, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><strong>Tony Burke MIA<br />
</strong>The International Court of Justice found the genocide case against Israel plausible in January 2024. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister.</p>
<p>In September 2025, the UN Commission of Inquiry, with Australian barrister Chris Sidoti on the panel, found Israel had committed genocide in Gaza. Sidoti has said Israeli personnel who served there should be interrogated wherever they land.</p>
<blockquote><p>They are landing here. And nobody is asking them anything.</p></blockquote>
<p>Section 501 of the Migration Act says a person fails the character test where there is reason to conclude they were involved in genocide, a crime against humanity or a war crime. No conviction is required. Families for Palestine put that section to Tony Burke on Tuesday.</p>
<p>He has not replied.</p>
<p>His department has the mechanism. In December 2024, two Israeli siblings were sent a 13-page military service form asking whether they had abused detainees or taken part in war crimes. Home Affairs called it routine. So here is the question.</p>
<p><strong>The question<br />
</strong>Was that routine form sent to 40 soldiers arriving together, with a sponsor, a promoter and a Facebook page? If yes, say so.</p>
<p>If no, explain why a comedian needed clearances from two governments to tell jokes, while a Golani lieutenant needed nothing but a bib.</p>
<p>Burke is not squeamish about the power. He cancelled Simcha Rothman’s visa a year ago and refused Ayelet Shaked and Hillel Fuld. Each time, the lobby howled that Jews were being punished for opinions.</p>
<p>Now go back to Wertheim’s sentence.</p>
<p><em>Debased generalisations about entire national communities.</em> He wrote it on behalf of an organisation that has spent two years defending an army whose commanders are wanted by the ICC and whose conduct a UN inquiry has called genocide.</p>
<p>He asked the government to ban a comedian for words. His movement is importing a Golani officer and a Unit 8200 department head for a party.</p>
<p>That is not a double standard. It is a single standard, applied with total consistency.</p>
<blockquote><p>Israelis are protected. Their critics are processed.</p></blockquote>
<p>The runners cross the Bridge at dawn. Youssef will reapply from Los Angeles. <em>MWM</em> has asked Home Affairs whether any of the delegation was sent the military service form and whether AIJAC or the ECAJ lobbied for them.</p>
<p>We will print the answer. We are not expecting one.</p>
<div data-profile-layout="layout-1" data-author-ref="user-2841" data-box-layout="slim" data-box-position="below" data-multiauthor="false" data-author-id="2841" data-author-type="user" data-author-archived="">
<div>
<h5><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/andrew-brown/"> Andrew Brown</a> is a Sydney businessman in the health products sector, former Deputy Mayor of Mosman and Palestine peace activist. First published by Michael West Media and republished with permission.</em></h5>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam Johnson: Coverage of my media book being banned proves the thesis</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/26/adam-johnson-coverage-of-my-media-book-being-banned-proves-the-thesis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antisemitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bondi Beach massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book banning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Sell a Genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media intimidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smear campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sydney Morning Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waverley Public Library]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Waverley Council in Sydney has removed a book strongly critical of Israel from its library shelves for review after a survivor of the Bondi Beach massacre condemned its prominent display as &#8220;deeply insensitive&#8221;. The book&#8217;s author has defended his publication, saying the episode is a good lesson in how the smearing of Palestine and its ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Waverley Council in Sydney has removed a book strongly critical of Israel from its library shelves for review after a survivor of the Bondi Beach massacre condemned its prominent display as &#8220;deeply insensitive&#8221;.</em> <em>The book&#8217;s author has defended his publication, saying the episode is a good lesson in how the smearing of Palestine and its defenders operates in mainstream Anglosphere media.</em><br />
<strong><br />
ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Adam Johnson</em></p>
<p>Last week,<a href="https://www.jwire.com.au/waverley-council-removes-controversial-gaza-book/"> JWire</a> reported that my book, <a href="https://www.plutobooks.com/product/how-to-sell-a-genocide/"><em>How to Sell a Genocide: The Media’s Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza</em></a>, had been “removed” from the Waverley public library in Sydney, Australia.</p>
<p>In covering the ban, some Australian media allowed pro-Israel propagandists to casually libel me as antisemitic, a false charge that is completely divorced from the content of the book, which is nuanced and fair and takes on universal themes of human dignity and opposition to colonialism and racism.</p>
<p>My first instinct was to merely post on social media about the banning, noting how absurd and racist the book ban defenders’ logic was, and move on with my life.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://theconversation.com/how-to-sell-a-genocide-has-been-removed-from-a-library-near-bondi-but-libraries-represent-freedom-of-thought-289988"><strong>READ MORE: </strong>How to Sell a Genocide has been removed from a library near Bondi – but libraries represent freedom of thought</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.jwire.com.au/waverley-council-removes-controversial-gaza-book/">Waverley Council removes controversial Gaza book after Bondi survivor speaks out</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Israeli+censorship">Other Israeli censorship reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_132638" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132638" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132638 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall.jpg" alt="How To Sell a Genocide cover" width="300" height="463" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall-194x300.jpg 194w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall-272x420.jpg 272w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132638" class="wp-caption-text">How To Sell a Genocide cover. Image: Pluto Press</figcaption></figure>
<p>After all, my book is not the story &#8212; nor, if it were, would this be a particular interesting one. On the list of free speech suppressions and libel in the past three years over Palestine, this wouldn’t crack the top 10,000.</p>
<p>But news of the ban was subsequently picked up by<em><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2026/aug/18/sydney-waverley-library-removes-book-how-to-sell-a-genocide-from-shelves-ntwnfb"> The Guardian Australia</a>,</em><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/israel-palestine-genocide-gaza-adam-johnson-sydney-library-b3034756.html"><em> Th</em>e Independent in the UK</a> and the largest newspaper in Australia,<em><a href="https://www.smh.com.au/culture/books/sydney-council-pulls-book-critical-of-israel-from-library-shelves-20260818-p60pff.html"> The Sydney Morning Herald</a></em>. And given how poor the coverage of the banning has been, namely by the latter two outlets, I thought this episode could be a good object lesson in how the smearing of Palestine and its defenders operates in mainstream Anglosphere media.</p>
<p>The fact that you can sling around libel without evidence in the largest newspapers in Australia gives us a window into how discussion of basic Palestinian rights is shut down using the most sectarian framing possible.</p>
<p>Let’s break down three tropes featured in the coverage of my book banning that I also detail in the book itself. Forgive me if this is meta &#8212; and a touch self-indulgent &#8212; but there’s a reason there are striking similarities, and it’s because the Israel lobby and its aggressive PR apparatus more or less use the same script for every act of smearing, censoring, and intimidation.</p>
<p>So they’re worth taking this opportunity to unpack.</p>
<p><strong>1. Feigned credulity: Taking pro-Israel crybully organisations at their word, rounding up to the most sectarian framing possible, and flattening Jewish identity and Zionist ideological activity.</strong></p>
<p><em>The Independent</em> and <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> largely embrace the pro-Israel lobby’s framing that the removal of my book was prompted entirely by, or at least largely by, a “complaint from a Bondi attack survivor”. <em>The Independent’s</em> Stuti Mishra would adopt this framing in its headline: “Australian library pulls book on Gaza from shelves after complaint from Bondi attack survivor,” the article announces.</p>
<p><em>The Sydney Morning Herald’s</em> Melanie Kembrey would also accept this framing at face value in her reporting, writing that, “the move follows a report by Jewish news service JWire last week that a survivor of the Bondi Beach massacre had posted on Facebook that she was distressed to see the book displayed on the new-release ‘What’s Hot’ shelf of Waverley Library.”</p>
<p>What’s important to emphasise here is: we have no way of knowing that this is what caused, or even sparked, the removal of the book. This is just an assertion made by those seeking to ban it.</p>
<p><em>JWire</em> reported, citing an alleged Facebook comment by the survivor in question, that her complaint is what prompted the book’s removal. But <em>The Guardian</em> reports that they were “unable to locate the Facebook post” in question.</p>
<p>More importantly, both <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> and <em>The Independent</em> seemingly contradict, or at least undermine, this simplistic narrative, by mentioning elsewhere in their articles that, as <em>The Independent noted,</em> the library council “has received multiple complaints about [the book]”.</p>
<p>So was the book banned because a Bondi attack survivor complained, or was it due to the “multiple complaints”? Or was it both? If it was both, do we know which came first: the Bondi survivor complaint or the “multiple” other complaints from, presumably, unrelated parties?</p>
<p>The timeline is important because it suggests a fairly bog standard pro-Israel propaganda technique of front-loading censorship &#8212; and other oppressive and illiberal actions &#8212; in the most sympathetic and humane language possible. Obviously, “Pro-Israel Organisations Successfully Ban Book on Gaza” hits differently than “Library pulls book on Gaza from shelves after complaint from Bondi attack survivor.”</p>
<p>After all, what kind of heartless monster would want to upset a Bondi attack survivor?</p>
<p>Alex Ryvchin, co-chief executive officer of the pro-Israel lobbying organisation ECAJ, was eager to praise my book’s removal from the library, telling <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em>, “A book of this sort has no place on the shelves of a library, especially one within minutes of where Australians were slaughtered in large part due to the dehumanisation of Jews precisely through this sort of libel.</p>
<p>&#8220;I commend the individual who spotted the book, herself a survivor of the massacre, and acted to have it removed.”</p>
<p>Was Ryvchin one of the other “multiple” parties that demanded my book be removed? If so, was it prior to the aforementioned Bondi survivor’s complaint? Did <em>The Herald</em> inquire about his involvement in the campaign to remove the book? Did <em>The Herald</em> ask him to specify examples or provide any evidence of me “dehumanising” Jewish people, a false and libelous accusation?</p>
<p>They did not. He is simply presented as a neutral observer with no involvement in the censorship campaign.</p>
<p>I sent a request for comment to the Waverley library last week, to try and pin down the timeline of the “complaints”. They replied this morning but ignored the question, instead objecting to my use of the word “ban” but not denying it was, indeed, banned.</p>
<p>“Contrary to some media reporting,” the library’s manager informed me via email, “the council has not ‘banned’ the book. It remains a part of our collection; however, it is currently unable to be borrowed pending completion of a review.”</p>
<p>Ah, ok, it wasn’t banned, it’s just “currently unavailable to be borrowed”. Well never mind then. Hopefully this “review” goes my way! A group of organisers in Australia have started a <a href="https://www.change.org/p/restore-how-to-sell-a-genocide-to-waverley-library-and-protect-the-public-s-right-to-read?recruiter=1427226572&amp;recruited_by_id=d6f47200-9dbd-11f1-9e5a-03c7216d6789&amp;utm_source=share_petition&amp;utm_campaign=starter_onboarding_share_personal&amp;utm_medium=copylink&amp;share_id=2CFRPTxTJT">petition</a> calling on the library to restore the book and “protect the public’s right to read”.</p>
<p>But, again, it’s important to make clear that my book being “removed” from one public library isn’t the story. The story is that this is only one part of a broader censorship and bully regime that is rapidly escalating in the West.</p>
<p>This story comes in the context of a massive crackdown on Free Speech in Australia, in particular, which is overwhelmingly targeting pro-Palestine speech and being done in the name of “combating antisemitism”. As Jacob Mchangama and Samantha Barbas<a href="https://www.ms.now/opinion/bondi-beach-australia-antisemitism-hate-speech-crackdown"> noted for <em>MSNOW</em></a> in January, “what began as a moment of national mourning [in the wake of the Bondi attack] has rapidly turned into one of the most sweeping expansions of hate speech laws and protest restriction powers in the country’s modern history.</p>
<p>Intended as an urgent response to antisemitism, <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.npr.org/2025/12/18/nx-s1-5647854/australia-to-review-migration-laws-after-bondi-beach-shooting__;!!HqJSLGM!puVEr_OxEiYT_y_5ZQ2zqSM2SQXhuAWRpr7eB7JwInjtyS-5yDRiVdIUljSf1qYHaKK1glwDCoqtyd78E8buvyuuhVtRt6OoOAs$">new federal</a> and<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/world/australia/new-laws-protests-hate-speech.html__;!!HqJSLGM!puVEr_OxEiYT_y_5ZQ2zqSM2SQXhuAWRpr7eB7JwInjtyS-5yDRiVdIUljSf1qYHaKK1glwDCoqtyd78E8buvyuuhVtRg0h24Qs$"> state measures</a> threaten to reach far beyond violence or direct incitement &#8212; reshaping how speech, protest and political dissent are regulated in the wake of terrorism.”</p>
<p>As I detail in said book, namely Chapter 8, “‘Antisemitism’ show trials and the smearing of campus protests,” framing suppression of Israel-critical speech in terms of sensitivity, anti-racism, and “fighting hate” is a textbook pro-Israel bully tactic.</p>
<p>Using liberalism against itself is a consistent and well-documented strategy from Zionist organisations to delegitimise, stigmatise, and brand as hateful those who are meaningfully critical of Israel and its regime of violence against Palestinians.</p>
<p>It’s useful here to distinguish <em>The Guardian’s</em> coverage from that of <em>The Sydney Morning Herald </em>and <em>The Independent.</em> <em>The Guardian’s</em> framing was mostly sceptical and fair. They sought comment from me, my publisher, and other critics of the book ban, and did not overly indulge the “Bondi survivor”.</p>
<p>I should also note that <em>Sydney Morning Herald’s</em> Kembrey did reach out to me for comment, but did so at 12:41 am central time and published her article a couple hours later. So alas, not being awake in the middle of the night costs me an original comment in <em>The Herald.</em> Though I doubt it would have mattered much in the overall credulous and uncritical orientation of the article.</p>
<p>The framing of the ban on my book as the ah shucks, entirely organic result of a “Bondi survivor,” without any interrogation of the source of these “multiple” other complaints, is doing 90 percent of the heavy lifting for the Zionist censorship lobby that was eager to not only praise the decision in the pages of <em>The Sydney Morning Herald,</em> but frame it in purely sectarian terms. That <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> and <em>The Independent</em> ran with the simplistic and manipulative “Bondi survivor complained” framing, without an ounce of scepticism, shows how these Israel advocacy organisations score major PR victories before the text of the article or any reporting is even done.</p>
<p>2<strong>. Reducing claims of genocide in Gaza to a fringe, subjective opinion by a “self-described radical publisher” while omitting it is the overwhelming consensus of human rights and humanitarian organizations, as well as genocide scholars.</strong></p>
<p>The reduction of mainstream opposition to Israel as an unserious or fringe position &#8212; while ignoring how widespread and obvious it is outside the corridors of beltway elite circles &#8212; is a trope I detailed in Chapter 9 of my book specially under the section, “The Atlantic And The Importance Of Policing Seriousness.”</p>
<p>All three articles framed the fact that Israel committed genocide in Gaza as a mere opinion of mine, without noting it is the broad consensus in the humanitarian and human rights world, as well as that of scholars tasked with studying and determining such matters.</p>
<p>While all three quoted me making this point, they did not <em>report on the fact of this consensus</em>. This isn’t just a vague feeling from a partisan leftwing media critic<em> &#8212; it’s the majority academic assessment</em>. They ought to have noted, as I detailed in my unpublished full comment to <em>The Guardian,</em> that genocide in Gaza<a href="https://zeteo.com/p/who-says-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-list-politicians-countries"> is the determination</a> of Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Doctors Without Borders, B’Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights &#8212; Israel, and the International Association of Genocide Scholars, as well as Omer Bartov, Israeli-American professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Brown University; Amos Goldberg, Israeli professor in the Department of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Raz Segal, Israeli historian and associate professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies and endowed professor in the Study of Modern Genocide at Stockton University, among dozens of other prominent Israeli and American scholars.</p>
<p>Instead of mentioning any of these liberal validators, that would have shown how fringe the book ban advocates’ position is and how mainstream my headline was, it is presented as a mere claim by the book’s author and we are then served up pat denials from Israel.</p>
<p>“Israel has repeatedly denied committing genocide in Gaza,” notes <em>The Independent</em> (though it does link to an article detailing UN’s claims of genocide). <em>The Guardian</em> writes that “Israel has repeatedly denied that it has committed genocide in Gaza” without highlighting the major humanitarian and human rights groups arguing otherwise.</p>
<p>The fact of Israel committing genocide in Gaza is overwhelming consensus among those tasked with documenting and determining such matters. Presenting this objective reality as <em>my opinion</em>, without citing the underlying evidence supporting it, is playing into the idea the “genocide” label is a fringe or emotionally charged label when it is anything but.</p>
<p><strong>3. Casually conflating Palestine solidarity with antisemitism and ISIS-inspired violence.</strong></p>
<p>The whole point of focusing on the Bondi survivor complainant is, of course, to conflate solidarity with Palestine with the Bondi attack, which was an ISIS-inspired massacre last December that killed 15 Australians (14 of<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgz15d5718o"> whom were Jewish</a>) and had absolutely zero to do with Palestine, Palestinians, or Gaza.</p>
<p>Indeed, the only major player in Palestine with significant links to ISIS is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who<a href="https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-06-05/ty-article/israel-arming-isis-affiliated-anti-hamas-gaza-militia-ex-defense-chief-claims/00000197-3f88-d079-ab97-7fcdd7120000"> Israeli outlet <em>Haaretz</em> reported last year</a> has been arming ISIS-linked gangs in Gaza to undermine Hamas and steal aid, a fact<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-hamas-war-netanyahu-arming-gangs-gaza-clans-activated/"> publicly confirmed</a> by Netanyahu’s former Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman.</p>
<p>Despite it having no factual basis, conflation of Palestinian militants, civil society and advocacy with “ISIS,” as I note in Chapter 1 of my book, “‘40 beheaded babies,’ the ISIS-ification of Hamas, and how to prime the American public for revenge,” was crucial to propagandising Western audiences and using the blunt instrument of Islamophobia to build sympathy for the cause of open-ended Israeli violence.</p>
<p>None of the above outlets felt it necessary to note that there has been no proven link between the Bondi Attack and Palestine solidarity. The Australian government has spent millions attempting to find such a connection, but<a href="https://jacobin.com/2026/01/australia-bondi-antisemitism-protest-palestine"> alas has come up empty</a>.</p>
<p>Why should pro-Israel advocates be permitted to casually make such a conflation without any reporters noting these two things are wholly unrelated? Why is this conflation of ISIS and Palestine solidarity permitted to be repeated without any attempt to correct this misconception? Perceptions on the part of a handful of motivated actors is not sufficient reason to indulge their delusions.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, racist conspiracy theories conflating Gaza advocacy with violence inspired by a movement and cause that has zero to do with Palestinians, and is largely<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/who-s-funding-isis-wealthy-gulf-angel-investors-officials-say-n208006"> backed by Israel’s regional allies</a>, is permitted without any pushback because these two things, in the Western, orientalist mind, feel vaguely related.</p>
<p>These are subtle interventions by the above outlets and, as I mention, far from the biggest crimes in Western media related to Palestine. I am not a free speech martyr, <a href="https://thejewishindependent.com.au/cancellation-library-book-controversy/">as some have alleged</a>, nor do I seek to be. But I think it is useful to note how, when reporting on the banning of a book about media propaganda, we saw at least three of the very tropes detailed in the book being banned.</p>
<p>These subtle framings, while seemingly minor in isolation, add up. They go, before one even notices, from lazy tropes, credulous reporting, and racist assumptions to a narrative, a <em>story</em>. Just like that, the banning of a perfectly sober, rigorous, and nuanced book is framed as a <em>small act of kindness for a terrorism victim</em>.</p>
<p>And the author, who went out of his way to be nonsectarian, to examine universal humanitarian themes, and to highlight Jewish anti-Zionist activism, is accused of horrific dehumanisation in Sydney’s largest newspaper without any pushback or deeper reporting.</p>
<p>The overt suppression of free speech in Australia is another major escalation, and embracing this grimy, misleading, and libelous framing without much thought or scepticism &#8212; as <em>The Independent</em> and <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> did — is yet another example of Western media’s role in selling genocide.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://substack.com/@thecolumn">Adam Johnson</a> is a media analyst and co-host of the podcast </em>Citations Needed<em>. His writing has been featured in </em>The Nation, In These Times, The Intercept, Los Angeles Times,<em> and </em>San Francisco Chronicle<em>. Republished from the substack <a href="https://substack.com/@thecolumn">The Column</a> under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Daily, collaborations, media education and Pacific outreach</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/24/china-daily-collaborations-media-education-and-pacific-outreach/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 11:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China in Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media globalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporters Without Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western media bias]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By David Robie, editor of Asia Pacific Report Some years ago when I headed the Pacific Media Centre that I founded at Auckland University of Technology, we ran a postgraduate internship programme at the China Daily in Beijing. It was part of a professional development exposure platform that also included Jakarta in Indonesia and ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By David Robie, editor of <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/">Asia Pacific Report</a></em></p>
<p>Some years ago when I headed the <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/index.html">Pacific Media Centre</a> that I founded at Auckland University of Technology, we ran a postgraduate internship programme at the <em>China Daily</em> in Beijing.</p>
<p>It was part of a professional development exposure platform that also included Jakarta in Indonesia and the Manila in the Philippines, along with several media and university journalism campus outlets in the Pacific, including the University of the South Pacific.</p>
<p>There was nothing else comparable at other journalism programmes in New Zealand, and now there are no opportunities of this kind after the <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01296612.2022.2118802">closure of the PMC in 2021</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://rsf.org/en/china-s-growing-grip-solomon-islands-fragile-media-sector"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> China’s growing grip on the Solomon Islands’ fragile media sector</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.asianz.org.nz/new-zealanders-perceptions-of-asia-2026">New Zealanders&#8217; Perceptions of Asia 2026</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=China+and+Pacific+media">Other reports on China and media in the Pacific</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But there was some eyebrow raising about our collaboration over <em>China Daily’s</em> soft diplomacy role at the heart of Chinese media as part of its growing outreach into the Pacific along with the global Belt and Road development policy.</p>
<p>Linked to our Asia Pacific journalism studies course with support by the Asia NZ Foundation, these three-month internships provided a good insight into how Chinese media operated for New Zealand journalists graduating with an eye on an Asia-Pacific media future.</p>
<p>“Advanced studies in comparative journalism and media globalisation” and the “political economy” of the countries studied were <a href="https://paperdescriptorreport.aut.ac.nz/PaperDescriptor/PaperDescriptor?courseCode=JOUR801&amp;date=2024-11-15&amp;saveFormat=pdf">important parts of our course</a>.</p>
<p>A glimpse of how some media operate outside of the Western bubble.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Polishers&#8217; of reports</strong><br />
The journalistic role that the students faced while they were at the <em>China Daily</em> were initially of a subeditorial or copy-editing nature &#8212; they were called “polishers” of English-language reports. But as time when on, the opportunities grew, including reporting assignments, feature writing, <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/pmc-blog/rosie-tuck-reporting-live-china-daily-2120.html">and broadcasting</a>.</p>
<p>On exchange, we also <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/profile/song-jingli.html">hosted professional journalists</a> from the <em>China Daily</em> on our journalism papers. Overall the collaborative experience was positive. But the stakes are much higher now.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132569" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132569" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-132569" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide.png" alt="China Daily's home page today" width="680" height="483" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide-300x213.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide-100x70.png 100w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide-591x420.png 591w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132569" class="wp-caption-text">China Daily&#8217;s home page today. Image: China Daily screenshot APT</figcaption></figure>
<p>The <em>China Daily</em> was founded as an English daily in 1981 and although it is owned and published by the Chinese Communist Party’s Publicity Department &#8212; the “Propaganda Department” &#8212; it is not an “official mouthpiece” of the CCP establishment.</p>
<p>In 2011, it <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/pmc-blog/chinas-english-daily-newspaper-hits-30-years-1144.html">celebrated 30 years of publishing</a> during our collaboration.</p>
<p><em>China Daily</em> has usually enjoyed a more &#8220;liberal&#8221; face than most other Chinese state media.</p>
<p>For example, coverage of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre">1989 Tiananmen Square massacre</a> was generally sympathetic to the student protests and at least one account claims that some of its journalists <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Daily#cite_note-oxfordreference_China_Daily-18">joined in the demonstrations</a>. Also, the paper&#8217;s coverage of the <a href="https://www.onlinemeded.com/blog/the-first-big-wave-looking-back-at-the-2002-2004-sars-outbreak-and-the-lessons-we-learnt-ahead-of-covid-19">Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)</a> outbreak of 2002-2004 was more fact-driven and balanced than the &#8220;official&#8221; state media.</p>
<p><em>China Daily</em> has also published sponsored inserts in such global newspapers as <em>The New York Times</em> and <em>Wall Street Journal</em> in the US and <em>Le Figaro</em> in France.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132567" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132567" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-132567" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide.png" alt="The China Daily headquarters" width="680" height="483" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide-300x213.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide-100x70.png 100w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide-591x420.png 591w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132567" class="wp-caption-text">The China Daily headquarters . . . a massive operation in Beijing&#8217;s in Chaoyang district. Image: China Daily/Wikipedia/Creative Commons</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Massive operation</strong><br />
Published out of a large headquarters in Chaoyang district, it is a massive operation by New Zealand standards, publishing the <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/static_e/printmedia.html">best part of a million copies daily</a>, two-thirds of the copies via special editions reaching at least 150 countries.</p>
<p>But the most visible face of the newspaper in New Zealand and the Pacific these days is online at the <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/"><em>China Daily</em> website</a>.</p>
<p><em>China Daily</em> has often <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202608/18/WS6a841aafa3106bc57421c21c.html">framed its Pacific outreach</a> through official editorials, youth forums and diplomatic rebuttals. It publicises green energy ties, criticises “foreign alarmism regarding regional expansion”, and argues that organisations such as the Pacific Islands Forum must back the one-China policy.</p>
<p>As the Chinese media outreach into the Pacific has been growing in recent years, the rivalry between Beijing, Washington and Canberra has been ratcheted up with accusations of “editorial interference and influence” in some countries, such as Kiribati and Solomon Islands, at least until the change of government in Honiara in May when Matthew Wale ousted the pro-China leadership in a general election.</p>
<p>In an in-depth report just two months before the election, the Paris-based media freedom watchdog <a href="https://rsf.org/en/china-s-growing-grip-solomon-islands-fragile-media-sector">Reporters Without Borders warned</a> that since Honiara had established diplomatic relations with China in 2019 the Pacific country had become a “strategic arena for Beijing’s influence”.</p>
<p>“By capitalising on the economic fragility of the local media sector, China has stepped up conditional funding, editorial partnerships and influence programmes to disseminate its narratives,&#8221; RSF said, calling on the Solomon Islands’ government to make the viability and independence of the media sector a priority.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132571" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132571" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132571 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26.png" alt="The China Daily opinion page" width="680" height="566" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26-300x250.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26-505x420.png 505w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132571" class="wp-caption-text">The China Daily opinion page . . . an invitation to contribute an op-ed. Image: China Daily screenshot APR</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Outreach invitation</strong><br />
The <em>China Daily</em> has stepped up its outreach initiatives in the Pacific lately as evidenced by an email to me four days ago inviting me to write an op-ed for the publication’s Opinion section. And the deadline is tomorrow.</p>
<p>Signed by an editor of the newspaper’s Opinion Department, the invitation said: “In early September, a high-level forum on media cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region will be held, bringing together senior media professionals and experts to discuss how the region’s media can better foster dialogue, trust and mutual understanding.</p>
<p>“We would be honoured to invite you to contribute an opinion article of around 800 words for publication in <em>China Daily</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The invitation continued:</p>
<figure id="attachment_132572" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132572" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132572 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-invitation-21-Aug-26.png" alt="The China Daily invitation" width="500" height="180" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-invitation-21-Aug-26.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-invitation-21-Aug-26-300x108.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132572" class="wp-caption-text">The China Daily invitation . . . deadline tomorrow. Image: Screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p><em>“As a reference, we have outlined several possible directions:</em><br />
<em>1. In the age of AI, how can Asia-Pacific media rebuild public trust?</em><br />
<em>2. From ‘reporting Asia’ to ‘telling Asia’s stories’: Can Asia-Pacific media move beyond Western narrative frameworks?</em><br />
<em>3. From “information competition” to media cooperation: How can Asia-Pacific media promote greater mutual understanding across the region?</em></p>
<p><em>These topics are only suggestions. We would be delighted if you chose to write on another angle that better reflects your current research or interests.</em></p>
<p><em>“Rather than opening with abstract concepts or institutional frameworks, we encourage authors to begin with something timely and tangible: a recent news event, a real-world development, or an everyday experience that readers immediately recognise.</em></p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Drawing in&#8217; readers</strong><em><br />
“Once readers are drawn in, the article can naturally expand to explain the broader policy, economic, technological or geopolitical forces behind it. In our experience, this narrative structure makes complex issues far more engaging for a broad international audience.</em></p>
<p><em>“The strongest pieces usually build around one central argument, moving from the concrete to the conceptual, from the familiar to the unfamiliar, and from today&#8217;s headline to its longer-term implications.</em></p>
<p><em>“We particularly value articles that combine the immediacy of current events with original analysis, clear storytelling and practical insights, rather than offering a comprehensive survey of every aspect of the topic.</em></p>
<p><em>“In addition to the written article, we would also be delighted if you could record a short video commentary of around one minute.</em></p>
<p><em>“A simple self-recorded video using a mobile phone would be perfectly fine. A vertical format with a clean and quiet background would be ideal; there is no need for professional filming or editing, as our team will handle the post-production.”</em></p>
<p>The invitation continued in the same vein.</p>
<p>Concluding, the email said: <em>“As our production schedule is quite tight, we would greatly appreciate it if you could send us both the article and the video by August 25, 2026.”</em></p>
<p>My reply? You are reading it right here on <em>Asia Pacific Report</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>An armed Jewish police force in Australia? Minns defies police and opens the door</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/23/an-armed-jewish-police-force-in-australia-minns-defies-police-and-opens-the-door/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 08:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed guards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed public power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Minns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Security Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favouritism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isaac Herzog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Board of Deputies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine protesters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private guards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The CSG is not legally police. Yet NSW Premier Chris Minns wants its armed guards patrolling public events despite senior police warning of favouritism and social fracture. One question exposes it all: would he ever permit an armed Muslim security force? Andrew Brown reports for Michael West Media. COMMENTARY: By Andrew Brown NSW Police examined ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The CSG is not legally police. Yet NSW Premier Chris Minns wants its armed guards patrolling public events despite senior police warning of favouritism and social fracture. One question exposes it all: would he ever permit an armed Muslim security force? Andrew Brown reports for <strong>Michael West Media</strong>.<br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Andrew Brown</em></p>
<p>NSW Police examined the Community Security Group (CSG) proposal and warned the Premier it would fracture the state. Chris Minns is doing it anyway.</p>
<p>He is backing armed members of a private organisation formed to protect one community patrolling public events. He calls it a trial. In public, it would resemble an armed Jewish police force.</p>
<p>Apply one test. Imagine armed private guards, trained overseas on a foreign government’s money, patrolling Eid prayers at Lakemba. How many minutes does that proposal survive?</p>
<p>READ MORE:</p>
<p>It would be denounced as sectarian militia building and killed before lunch.</p>
<p><strong>Favouritism with a firearms licence<br />
</strong>And that rejection would be correct. A privilege unthinkable for any other community is not security policy. It is favouritism with a firearms licence, the state deciding whose fear earns guns and whose fear earns batons.</p>
<p>The GSG is not legally a police force and would not acquire general police powers. That, precisely, is the problem. Minns proposes putting armed private guards into public space without the command, accountability, discipline or universal duty owed by NSW Police.</p>
<p>CSG operates under the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, combining security professionals and volunteers to protect Jewish life, institutions and events. Its licensed guards already carry firearms at approved Jewish schools and synagogues.</p>
<p>Extending that into public gatherings crosses the line between guarding private premises and wielding armed power among the public.</p>
<p><strong>Pistol apartheid opposed by police<br />
</strong>NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson was unambiguous. Protecting every member of the community is the job of police. Granting one part of society exceptional armed privileges, he warned, would appear favouritism, fracture tenuous relationships and create friction between groups.</p>
<p>Police Association president Kevin Morton was even more blunt. Only NSW Police are charged with protecting the people of NSW. If one private organisation is allowed to arm in public, where does it stop?</p>
<blockquote><p>Minns’s answer is: wherever the lobby demands.</p></blockquote>
<p>Minns joined AIJAC’s inaugural Rambam Israel Fellowship in 2003, later celebrated as a “strong friend” by the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies. He entrenched Operation Shelter and rushed through protest restrictions later unanimously struck down by the Court of Appeal.</p>
<p>The double standard already played out on Sydney’s streets. Before peaceful protesters gathered to oppose Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Minns restricted protest, declared the visit a major event and mobilised more than 3000 police shifts, 500 at the demonstration.</p>
<p>His police kettled, punched, pepper sprayed and dragged protesters. They sprayed Muslims as they knelt in prayer.</p>
<blockquote><p>They broke a 69-year-old woman’s back in four places.</p></blockquote>
<p>Human Rights Watch found apparent excessive force. The LECC is investigating. <em>Michael West Media</em> understands civil claims are being prepared, with taxpayers facing potentially enormous damages.</p>
<p>The community whose worshippers his police pepper sprayed would never be handed its own armed guards. The community whose lobby cultivated the Premier for two decades is offered them.</p>
<p>That is not equal citizenship. It is a hierarchy, and Minns built it.</p>
<p><strong>What of proper process?<br />
</strong>A former Sydney CSG volunteer and Army officer lost his security clearance after a tribunal upheld ASIO’s assessment that he placed loyalty to Israel above Australia and was vulnerable to exploitation by Israeli intelligence.</p>
<p>His CSG training in Israel, financed by the Israeli government, involved tactical planning and firearms.</p>
<p>That case does not implicate every CSG member. It makes blind political trust grotesquely irresponsible. A competent government would examine the group’s governance, overseas training, intelligence links and command before expanding its armed reach. Minns asked for none of it.</p>
<p>Then the operational nightmare. Police responding to an attack could confront multiple armed private guards. Who commands them? How do police tell defenders from attackers in seconds?</p>
<p>Who answers when a bystander dies?</p>
<p>Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell questioned the fantasy that guns create safety.</p>
<blockquote><p>Australia rejected that fantasy after Port Arthur.</p></blockquote>
<p>NSW already has 250 armed response officers. If a Jewish event faces a credible armed threat, deploy them.</p>
<p>Jewish Australians deserve the full protection of the state, as every Australian does. What they do not need is a Premier handing them guns no other community would ever be allowed, and the isolation that comes with them.</p>
<p>Minns is not protecting equality. He is letting lobby power decide who may carry arms in public and who gets batons for praying.</p>
<p>This is political capture wearing a gun belt.</p>
<div data-profile-layout="layout-1" data-author-ref="user-2841" data-box-layout="slim" data-box-position="below" data-multiauthor="false" data-author-id="2841" data-author-type="user" data-author-archived="">
<div><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/andrew-brown/"><em> Andrew Brown</em></a><em> is a Sydney businessman in the health products sector, former Deputy Mayor of Mosman and Palestine peace activist.</em></div>
<div></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bondi Royal Commission: A &#8216;slippery slope to eroding our freedoms&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/22/bondi-royal-commission-a-slippery-slope-to-eroding-our-freedoms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIJAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antisemitism Envoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bondi Royal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepcut News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Centre for Law and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jillian Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael West Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mossad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Israel bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The “insidious fallout” of Australia&#8217;s Bondi Royal Commission is upon us. Before the Commission has even reported, the “slippery slope to eroding our freedoms has begun”, writes Jeffrey Loewenstein for Michael West Media. COMMENTARY: By Jeffrey Loewenstein As Australia&#8217;s Royal Commission into Antisemitism grinds through its 9th and final &#8220;Hearing Block&#8221;, one is now able ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The “insidious fallout” of Australia&#8217;s Bondi Royal Commission is upon us. Before the Commission has even reported, the “slippery slope to eroding our freedoms has begun”, writes Jeffrey Loewenstein for <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/"><strong>Michael West Media</strong></a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Jeffrey Loewenstein</em></p>
<p>As Australia&#8217;s Royal Commission into Antisemitism grinds through its 9th and final &#8220;Hearing Block&#8221;, one is now able to make some assessments and judgments about the Commission, the Commissioner and the evidence presented to the Commission.</p>
<p>The Commission has being accused of being influenced by the usual suspects in the Jewish community and in turn the Executive Council of  Australia (ECAJ) has accused the Commission as having been</p>
<blockquote><p>“hijacked” by Palestinian/Arab community interests.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell was quick to stamp on that assertion.</p>
<p>While not being revealed here for the first time, there are certainly troubling aspects relating the Commission when one looks at the whole “picture”.</p>
<p>For starters, the firm of solicitors retained by the Commission to act as its lawyers are Gilbert+Tobin &#8212; the very firm selected by Federal Attorney-General Michelle Rowland (who, surprise, was a partner at the firm) without any open tenders being called.</p>
<p>The same firm acts for interests closely aligned with Israel such as the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC). The firm is even a sponsor of the organisation.</p>
<p>Then there is Mark Leibler, the chairman of the unelected AIJAC (Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council) and senior partner of his firm Arnold Bloch Leibler. Leibler is impeccably connected to senior politicians, acts for many of them and is closely identified with Israel, including a close relationship with Mossad.</p>
<p>Enter the Royal Commission and the Commission through the Attorney-General’s Department inviting persons wanting to make submissions but seeking assistance from a lawyer to do so. Here the Department partnered with a previously unknown, murky, and new,</p>
<blockquote><p>pro-Zionist legal body to assist people in their submissions.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to <a href="https://www.deepcutnews.com/p/zionist-legal-body-chosen-to-solicit">Deepcut News,</a> the AG’s Department had “partnered with” this new pro-Israel group, the Jewish Centre for Law and Justice, to solicit submissions.</p>
<p><strong>The Segal agenda<br />
</strong>Finally, there is the Anti-Semitism Envoy, Jillian Segal, not only a one-time chair of lobby group ECAJ but also of the Australian-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC). It has been clear from the outset that her agenda has been to be promote the Israeli Zionist and Jewish narrative.</p>
<blockquote><p>She has made misleading assertions</p></blockquote>
<p>and submissions to the Royal Commission &#8212; such as that there were only some 9000 people who marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge in protest during the March for Humanity (independent estimates put the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Sydney_Harbour_Bridge_protest">figure at between 225,000 and 300,000</a> taking part), that those who did (like those in all other weekly marches around Australia for two and a half years) were antisemitic &#8212; and absurdly that anti-Semitism is “rampant” in Australia.</p>
<p>These were recurrent themes echoed by many of the witnesses selected, that the anti-genocide protest movement was antisemitic.</p>
<p><strong>The Bell challenge<br />
</strong>Enter the Royal Commissioner, Virginia Bell. It is not known to whom she spoke or what she might have read &#8212; one can make a good calculated guess &#8212; but without having heard a word of evidence or submissions from anyone, at  the outset of Day One of the public hearings, Bell announced that she would proceed on the basis of the IHRA definition even if it was in part contentious.</p>
<p>What makes this more than startling &#8212; coming from a lawyer and one-time High Court justice &#8212; is that there are serious critical criticisms of the IHRA, including from the lead draftsman of it who has publicly written that</p>
<blockquote><p>the definition has been “weaponised”.</p></blockquote>
<p>And that she has ignored the respected Jerusalem Declaration on Anti-Semitism (JDA). It is no criticism of the Royal Commissioner personally, but given she is not Jewish she has been prepared to either ignore, or disregard, the JDA &#8212; drafted by Jews no less! <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Declaration_on_Antisemitism">As noted in Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<p>“<em>The drafting of the declaration was initiated in June 2020 under the auspices of the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem by eight coordinators, most of whom were university professors. Upon its completion, the declaration was signed by about 200 scholars in various fields and released in March 2021.</em>”</p>
<p><strong>Evidence untested<br />
</strong>As the hearings have unfolded at least two things have been evident. There has been little or no cross-examination, or even gentle questioning, of witnesses. Whatever has been said &#8212; some of which has been absurd, such as the woman who testified that she felt “uncomfortable” seeing TV bulletins showing Gaza in the lift at her place of work &#8212; has simply been left out there.</p>
<p>Then, many important witnesses have been refused an appearance at the Commission. One example is the organiser of the Sydney Harbour Bridge March and many other marches.</p>
<p>As the Commissioner has been charged as part of the Commission to consider social cohesion, many who could speak to the subject have been refused attendance to give evidence, or simply not been called at the Commission.</p>
<p>The Australian public now awaits the Commissioner’s Report in December. However, in the real world outside the Commission, “interesting” things have occurred which, if nothing else,</p>
<blockquote><p>ought to give the Commissioner more than pause for thought.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Two court decisions counter Zionist narrative</strong><br />
In the case of <em>Wertheim v  Haddad [2025] FCA 720 (1 July 2025)</em> &#8212; a case brought in the Federal Court by two senior stalwarts of the ECAJ, Justice Stewart acknowledged (as conceded by the Applicants) that political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, was not by its nature criticism of Jewish people in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.</p>
<blockquote><p>Justice Stewart distinguished between legitimate political discourse and antisemitism,</p></blockquote>
<p>stating that, “The conclusion that it is not antisemitic to criticise Israel is the corollary of the conclusion that to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is antisemitic; the one flows from the other”.</p>
<p>Even more interesting is the recent decision by Justice Fagan in the NSW Supreme Court a few weeks ago. Fagan said the IHRA formulation did not reflect the established Australian meaning of antisemitism and described it as an attempt to “repurpose” the term to encompass both hatred of Jews and criticism of Israel.</p>
<p>Moreover, Fagan said the IHRA definition was</p>
<blockquote><p>“detached from the reality of common usage”.</p></blockquote>
<p>His Honour also said that “The … (IHRA) core text is so verbose and imprecise that it could not realistically be attributed to the ordinary, reasonably informed member of the Australian public.”</p>
<p>“Fagan was equally dismissive of the proposition that institutional adoption of the IHRA definition had altered the ordinary meaning of the word. He cited former NSW Supreme Court judge Sir Stephen Spedley, who had criticised the formulation because it</p>
<blockquote><p>“fails the first test of any definition: it is indefinite”.</p></blockquote>
<p>The fact that governments and several institutions had adopted the IHRA wording did not, Fagan said, “change the established meaning of a word that has been in use in the English language for 150 years”.</p>
<p>Instead, <a href="https://www.deepcutnews.com/p/nsw-supreme-court-criticises-ihra?utm_source=publication-search">he said</a>, the IHRA formulation “propounds a concept different from that which ‘antisemitism’ has long been understood to describe and appropriates that word to the novel concept”.</p>
<p><strong>Commissioner’s conundrum<br />
</strong>Commissioner Bell is now going to be met with a conundrum &#8212; determine what has been put before her at the Commission by the usual pro-Israel suspects, including Segal &#8212; who would label any criticism of Israel or Australian supporters of Israel as antisemitic and that IHRA was the appropriate “definition” of what constituted antisemitism &#8212; or accept what is being decided by judges confronted with evidence in the real world.</p>
<p>Finally, and insidiously, before the Commissioner has even issued her report, let alone any recommendations, we see the following having already occurred:</p>
<ol>
<li>Segal has been deploying her office, using taxpayer monies, together with Jewish organisations (Courage to Care being just one of them and backed and supported by the likes of the Gandel Foundation) &#8212; and also supported by government grants &#8212; out there in the guise of teaching what is antisemitism or guiding local councils around Australia into accepting that the IHRA is the way of determining what is antisemitic. Of concern is that these Jewish groups propounding this narrative are avowed and publicly pro-Israel Zionist organisations.</li>
<li>The Federal Education Minister has flagged that universities will be required to appropriately address antisemitism on campus on pain of being fined up to $2 million if found wanting in their efforts.</li>
</ol>
<p>Be aware! The slippery-slope to curbing our freedoms of expression has begun.</p>
<div data-profile-layout="layout-1" data-author-ref="user-2853" data-box-layout="slim" data-box-position="below" data-multiauthor="false" data-author-id="2853" data-author-type="user" data-author-archived="">
<div><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/jeffrey-loewenstein/"> Jeffrey Loewenstein</a> LL.B was a member of the Victorian Bar and a one-time chair of the Anti-Defamation Commission and member of the Jewish Community Council of Victoria. This article was first published by Michael West Media and is republished with permission.</em></div>
<div></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia, don&#8217;t be surprised. Israel does this to Palestinians all the time</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/21/australia-dont-be-surprised-israel-does-this-to-palestinians-all-the-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 23:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDF impunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lalzawmi “Zomi” Frankcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media perceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramallah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Central Kitchen]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Adla Alnazer The IDF&#8217;s decision not to open a criminal investigation into the deaths of seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including an Australian citizen, drew strong condemnation. But for Palestinians, this has simply become the norm. Four years ago, when I arrived from Palestine to study for my Master&#8217;s degree in ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Adla Alnazer</em></p>
<p>The IDF&#8217;s decision not to open a criminal investigation into the deaths of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Central_Kitchen_aid_convoy_attack">seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen</a>, including an Australian citizen, drew strong condemnation.</p>
<p>But for Palestinians, this has simply become the norm.</p>
<p>Four years ago, when I arrived from Palestine to study for my Master&#8217;s degree in Melbourne, Australia, I had a hard time finalising some paperwork related to government services, simply because I could not create an account. The problem was that my country, at the time, wasn&#8217;t listed within the governmental system.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/20/palestinian-theologian-warns-against-trusting-israel-over-hind-medics-killings-probe/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Palestinian theologian warns against trusting Israel over Hind, medics killings probe</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/10/3/what-did-al-jazeeras-investigation-into-israeli-war-crimes-in-gaza-reveal">What did Al Jazeera’s investigation into Israeli war crimes in Gaza reveal?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/3/13/from-gaza-to-la-hopes-rise-as-the-voice-of-hind-rajab-heads-to-the-oscars">Who was Hind Rajab and why is Israel investigating her killing?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.knkx.org/2026-08-19/israeli-military-launches-criminal-probes-into-killings-of-5-year-old-and-paramedics">Israeli military launches criminal probes into killings of 5-year-old and paramedics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide">Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>There was no &#8220;Palestine&#8221; or &#8220;West Bank&#8221; and not even a slot for &#8220;Occupied Palestinian Territories&#8221;. At another interaction with local bureaucracy, the worker who received my passport commented that it was the first time he had seen a Palestinian one.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am sorry,&#8221; he said politely, &#8220;but I can&#8217;t even see it on the map.&#8221;</p>
<p>By the time we left Melbourne in 2024 and returned to our home in Ramallah, a lot had changed. For many months, hundreds of thousands of people gathered every Sunday in the city centre, raising Palestinian flags and calling to end Israel&#8217;s war in Gaza.</p>
<p>Watching these protests develop and gather steam, I came to realise that they were taking place not because Australia had become as &#8220;pro-Palestinian&#8221; as some of the media coverage had suggested, but rather because Israel&#8217;s image had badly deteriorated.</p>
<p><strong>Australian opinion shifted</strong><br />
In September of 2025, the shifts in Australian public opinion regarding Israel and the occupation found their way into the country&#8217;s official policies, when the government in Canberra recognised Palestine. Australia was one of several influential countries to do so in recent years.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132418" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132418" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132418 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide-.png" alt="Lalzawmi “Zomi” Frankcom" width="500" height="503" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide-.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide--298x300.png 298w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide--150x150.png 150w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide--417x420.png 417w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132418" class="wp-caption-text">Australian citizen Lalzawmi “Zomi” Frankcom . . . one of seven World Central Kitchen aid workers killed by the Israeli military in Gaza in 2024. Image: World Central Kitchen</figcaption></figure>
<p>One of the most influential turning points in Australian public views of Israel came in April 2024 when an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Central_Kitchen_aid_convoy_attack">Israeli airstrike on Deir al-Balah killed seven aid workers</a> from the humanitarian organisation World Central Kitchen, among them Zomi Frankcom, a 43-year-old woman from Melbourne.</p>
<p>For many Australians watching the horrors in Gaza from afar, that was the moment the war became personal.</p>
<p>This week, an internal inquiry by the Israeli military determined there was no criminal wrongdoing by any of the officers or soldiers involved in the fatal incident. Two years after the aid workers had been killed, Israel made clear it had no intention to punish anyone for their deaths, or even allow a proper independent investigation.</p>
<p>In Australia, this decision has been received with a mixture of anger and disappointment. The Australian Foreign Minister summoned the Israeli ambassador in protest.</p>
<p>I was following the headlines in Australia&#8217;s leading news websites from my home in Ramallah and realised how different my expectations as a Palestinian are from Israel, compared to those of many Australians. For me, there was nothing surprising about the Israeli military shielding soldiers from accountability.</p>
<p><em>Adla Alnazer is a public policy consultant and former adviser to the Palestinian government. This article was first published by Haaretz.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeremy Rose: AI-generated good ‘news’ floods social media</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/18/jeremy-rose-why-ai-is-good-news-for-modern-man/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 06:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI slop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacinda Ardern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindness in power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positive stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substack]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Jeremy Rose A few months back, the story of the Victoria University of Wellington economist Dr Eleanor Vance and her 1978 paper &#8220;The Market Autocrat: Anticipating the Neoliberal Siege on Welfare States&#8221; was shared numerous times on my Facebook feed. Soon after, the heartwarming story of former prime minister Jacinda Ardern donating hundreds ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Jeremy Rose</em></p>
<p>A few months back, the story of the Victoria University of Wellington economist Dr Eleanor Vance and her 1978 paper &#8220;The Market Autocrat: Anticipating the Neoliberal Siege on Welfare States&#8221; was shared numerous times on my Facebook feed.</p>
<p>Soon after, the heartwarming story of former prime minister Jacinda Ardern donating hundreds of thousands of dollars from speaking fees to building shelters for the homeless was all over social media.</p>
<p>And yesterday, I read about a meeting between the radical leftist former president of Uruguay, Pepe Mujica, and Princess Diana sharing their “deepest reflections on life”.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://youtu.be/uqcoTwPUSn4?si=s54y7dkCCtrHkN19"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Who&#8217;s behind the flood of AI slop online?</a> &#8212; <em>The Listening Post</em></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_132289" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132289" style="width: 1332px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132289 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1332" height="1498" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide.jpg 1332w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-267x300.jpg 267w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-911x1024.jpg 911w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-768x864.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-696x783.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-1068x1201.jpg 1068w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-373x420.jpg 373w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1332px) 100vw, 1332px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132289" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p>The three stories have two things in common: they’re positive stories aimed squarely at political progressives, and they’re complete bullshit: AI slop.</p>
<p>Worryingly, they were shared on my social media feeds by a former board member of RNZ, a former foreign correspondent, a former journalism lecturer, and the editor of a professional trade magazine.</p>
<p>I’ve just read a tearjerker of a note here on Substack about Rachel Foster, a Vermont baker who took to delivering a blueberry muffin each Friday to a customer in a hospice. Gemini tells me it’s AI slop. (Yes, there’s an irony in the fact that by far the quickest way to identify AI slop is to ask an AI.)</p>
<p>That note has received more than 27,700 likes and 780 restacks.</p>
<p><strong>Confession time</strong><br />
And, confession time, a year or so ago, I might have shared a piece of viral AI slop when I first heard about Burkina Faso’s leader Captain Ibrahim Traore and his defiant anti-imperialism. I say might because there were some legitimate stories among the flood of AI-generated video and text stories that filled my social media feeds.</p>
<p>Rosa Cafferty, in her paper <a href="https://stand.ie/stand-newsroom/digital-divide-algorithm-breeding-ground-hate">A Digital Divide: A Breeding Ground for Hate</a>, explains how social media’s need for eyeballs for its advertisers has seen it using algorithms to cluster people into bubbles and echo chambers.</p>
<p>“Algorithms exploit vulnerabilities, prioritising sensational, emotional, and divisive content which thrives on outrage and extremity. As a result, posts evoking anger, outrage, and fear gain far more visibility than those promoting reflection or nuance.”</p>
<p>That’s undoubtedly true but something else is going on here. People are sharing heartwarming and inspiring stories “promoting reflection” and “nuance” &#8212; that are completely bogus. If nothing else, it reveals there’s a demand for stories that give people hope.</p>
<p>My Facebook feed is, like everyone else’s, populated by my “friends” &#8212; people who not surprisingly share many of my values and interests.</p>
<p>If I were, say, an anti-abortion supporter of one rule for all, corporal punishment, and a tough-on-crime approach, no doubt my “friends” and the algorithms would be dishing up an entirely different AI menu &#8212; different but still most likely a bogus one.</p>
<p>The business logic of algorithms driving division and anger, described by Cafferty, is the same logic that drives commercial media: maximising the number of eyeballs that can be fed paid adverts.</p>
<p><strong>Same thing with a twist</strong><br />
The same thing is at play here but with a twist. While Meta, X, and YouTube have traditionally platformed content created by the mainstream media, cannibalising their advertising base in the process, now Meta is paying creators to produce content. Content that doesn’t need to meet any standards of accuracy or truth.</p>
<p>The Jacinda Ardern slop was posted by a page called Kindness in Power. Until recently it was wall-to-wall AI-generated stories celebrating Ardern, many of which went viral. It currently has 5800 followers – including four I know, one of whom is a published writer.</p>
<p>Choosing Ardern with her massive following &#8212; both in Aotearoa and internationally &#8212; and her much smaller but highly motivated haters was a masterstroke. Glowing stories about Ardern are shared and commented on equally by those who love her and those who don’t and want to cry hypocrisy (and much worse).</p>
<p>Kindness in Power has &#8212; for some reason &#8212; pivoted from Ardern to stories about the All Blacks:</p>
<p><em>BREAKING: Former All Blacks Standout Identified as a Primary Suspect in Shocking S.ex.ual Ass.ault Investigation…</em></p>
<p><em>SHOCKING NEWS: The All Blacks have just announced that the team has parted ways with one of its veteran players…</em></p>
<p>There’s still the occasional political post but without the kindness:</p>
<p><em>BREAKING 30 MINS AGO: Chris Hipkins and Toni Grace have just delivered a massive bombshell announcement, sending shockwaves throughout New Zealand and leaving supporters…</em></p>
<p><strong>Not a winning plan</strong><br />
It’s not a winning game plan. That story about Jacinda Ardern and the homeless was shared and liked thousands of times; the All Black ones rarely get liked more than a handful of times.</p>
<p>“Shady” who shared the story about the kind-hearted Vermont baker ended the note by inviting readers to subscribe to “see more kindness stories like this”.</p>
<p>Does Shady know it’s a made-up story &#8212; probably. Should Shady know &#8212; definitely.</p>
<p>Another Shady post is lifted directly from Moonlight_myths on X, which describes itself as: Story sanctuary &#8212; Quote haven &#8212; bite-size novels and pure vibe.</p>
<p>Anyone on X looking at Moonlight_myths&#8217; bio is aware the story is fiction, while thousands of commenters on Substack believe it to be real.</p>
<p>Shady has 23,000 subscribers on Substack &#8212; some paying the US$6.50 a month &#8212; and tens of thousands of followers across other social media platforms.</p>
<p>There’s a link at the bottom of the President Mujica–Princess Di Facebook post that takes you to a page that explains it was an AI-generated “what if” story. (I doubt anyone who had clicked on that link would bother sharing the article. It makes a piss-poor fairy tale.)</p>
<p><strong>Request to Deepseek</strong><br />
I asked Deepseek &#8212; the Chinese AI that’s apparently slightly less environmentally disastrous than its US competitors &#8212; to write me a short story based on an imaginary meeting between the princess and the president. In less than five seconds this is some of what it spat out.</p>
<p><em>A princess trapped in a broken marriage arrived seeking help, but a former guerrilla fighter, living without luxuries, uttered a phrase that left her trembling: “Freedom costs, but slavery costs more.” Imagine a world where a British royal princess and a former Uruguayan guerrilla fighter shared their deepest reflections on life. It seems impossible, but it happened… At the presidential residence, José Mujica, then a senator, sipped mate in the garden while reviewing some documents. His hands, calloused from years of working the land, firmly held the traditional gourd.</em></p>
<p>Sure, there are giveaways for fans of Mujica: he never lived at the presidential residence, preferring a shack on his small farm. And the style has the ickiness of so much AI inspirational slop. And it plagiarised the other AI produced story.</p>
<p>But five seconds! Facebook creators can literally churn out hundreds of these stories an hour and Meta will pay them for it.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-06/ragebait-how-facebook-is-paying-controversial-creators/106940696?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&amp;utm_content=twitter&amp;utm_medium=content_shared&amp;utm_source=abc_news_web">ABC investigation last week</a> revealed Meta is paying white nationalists with neo-Nazi links and an anti-vaxxer to create content.</p>
<p>Meta declined to comment but it seems the company is agnostic about whether its creators are peddling hate or spreading fake stories of hope &#8212; as long as they’re capturing eyeballs.</p>
<p>And AI are just as quick at churning out fake images. An author of books on heterodox economics &#8212; not someone you’d expect to be fooled easily &#8212; recently shared this photo of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni draped in the Palestinian flag.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132291" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132291" style="width: 1042px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132291 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1042" height="1510" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide.jpg 1042w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-207x300.jpg 207w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-707x1024.jpg 707w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-768x1113.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-696x1009.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-290x420.jpg 290w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1042px) 100vw, 1042px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132291" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p>The image and others like it have gone viral. The world is desperate, it seems, for a woman leader of courage to call out the ongoing genocide in Gaza. Sadly, Meloni, a fan of Mussolini, isn’t that woman.</p>
<p>The Jewish president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, is a leader who has spoken out repeatedly against the genocide, but weirdly it’s barely reported.</p>
<p>It’s not only content creators wanting to make a quick buck using AI to generate images. A post in support of Martyn “Bomber” Bradbury recently included a photo of him smoking a pipe out of his cheek.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132293" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132293" style="width: 1340px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132293 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1340" height="1202" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide.jpg 1340w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-300x269.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-1024x919.jpg 1024w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-768x689.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-696x624.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-1068x958.jpg 1068w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-468x420.jpg 468w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1340px) 100vw, 1340px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132293" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p>And a group opposing the building of AI data centres in New Zealand posted this obviously AI-generated image a week or so ago.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132294" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132294" style="width: 1320px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132294 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1320" height="1260" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall.jpg 1320w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-300x286.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-1024x977.jpg 1024w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-768x733.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-696x664.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-1068x1019.jpg 1068w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-440x420.jpg 440w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1320px) 100vw, 1320px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132294" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Already passed the point?</strong><br />
Now it feels as if we’re still at a point where the sceptical can spot AI slop. But with AI developing at an incredible pace, who knows how long that will last and whether we’d know if we had already passed that point.</p>
<p><em>The New York Times</em> is reporting today that (gift link): “The digital sewage heap has sprawled across tech platforms, cheapening meaningful content and polluting the information ecosystem, as chatbots and video generators continue to advance.”</p>
<p>And it reports that across the internet, tech companies are undertaking a generative waste detox.</p>
<p>We can be sure that the detox is being undertaken for one reason and one reason only: the inundation of the internet with seemingly unlimited AI slop is bad for business. But it seems what’s bad for one business is good for another: Meta.</p>
<p>In the 1960s the American Bible Society published Good News for Modern Man in the hope of spreading the Christian message amongst the masses; today social media platforms are full of AI-generated fake good news stories (as well as stories of hate and pretty much any shit you can imagine) all driven by the state religion: capitalism.</p>
<p>It’s bad news for humanity, and one thing we can all do is stop sharing it and for everyone’s sake stop using it to produce second rate writing and even worse images.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://towardsdemocracy.substack.com/about">Jeremy Rose</a> is a Wellington-based journalist and an Asia Pacific Report contributor. His Substack is <a href="https://towardsdemocracy.substack.com/">Towards Democracy</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strait of Hormuz: It&#8217;s not just the numbers &#8211; it&#8217;s the ships&#8217; vote and that&#8217;s for Iran</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/15/strait-of-hormuz-its-not-just-the-numbers-its-the-ships-vote-and-thats-for-iran/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 06:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American warned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control of the strait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kpler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passage permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permit system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Persian Gulf Strait Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congressional Research Service]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Special Corespondent Maritime intelligence firm Kpler counted 13 vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday. The number is small. But the number is not the story. The story is that nine of those 13 took the Iranian-approved route. The route American warned ships against using. READ MORE: Trump says he will declare Hormuz US ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Special Corespondent</em></p>
<p>Maritime intelligence firm Kpler counted 13 vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday.</p>
<p>The number is small. But the number is not the story.</p>
<p>The story is that nine of those 13 took the Iranian-approved route. The route American warned ships against using.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/8/15/iran-war-live-trump-vows-to-make-hormuz-us-territory-pretty-soon"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Trump says he will declare Hormuz US territory ‘pretty soon’</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">Other war on Iran reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Now the question is: Trump says the strait is &#8220;under our control&#8221;. So whose instructions are the ships following?</p>
<p>The answer is in the arithmetic. Sixty-nine percent of them ignored the American warning and entered Iran&#8217;s lane.</p>
<p>That is not a statement. Not a claim. That is a vote.</p>
<p>And the vote was cast by people with hundreds of millions of dollars floating on that water.</p>
<p><strong>Plain language</strong><br />
CNN put it in plainer language. They wrote that the figure <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/14/world/live-news/iran-war-trump">does not reflect Trump&#8217;s repeated insistence</a> this week that the strait is &#8220;open&#8221; and under American control.</p>
<p>But today&#8217;s article will not only be about counting ships. Because Iran has done something on paper as well, and it has barely been discussed.</p>
<p>In May, Iran created an institution &#8212; the Persian Gulf Strait Authority.</p>
<p>According to a report by the US Congressional Research Service, <a href="https://www.marineinsight.com/iran-says-strait-of-hormuz-under-its-control-and-management-rejects-trumps-total-control-claim/">Iran declared that no vessel may pass through the Strait of Hormuz</a> without a valid passage permit issued by this authority.</p>
<p>Notice what that is. It is not a threat. It is administration.</p>
<p>A threat can stop a ship, but build a permit system and you never need to stop one. The ship comes to you and asks for permission.</p>
<p>And this is where Iran&#8217;s strategy becomes visible. Early in the war, Iran attacked vessels. That was a display of strength, but it carried a cost &#8212; every attack drained away the world&#8217;s sympathy.</p>
<p><strong>A legal face</strong><br />
Now Iran attacks less and sells permits instead. Same result, but the face of it is legal.</p>
<p>There is one more line in the CRS report, and it is the foundation of this strategy. Iranian leaders claim it was the June memorandum of understanding that granted them the right to administer shipping through this strait.</p>
<p>Which is Iran saying:&#8221;We did not seize this power. You signed it over to us on paper.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what Iran&#8217;s <a href="https://thefederal.com/category/international/us-iran-war-mou-strait-of-hormuz-247701">Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf said on June 23</a> is now coming true. He said &#8220;management of the strait will never return to the way it was before the war&#8221;.</p>
<p>But, yes, there is a big &#8220;but&#8221; here. And it would be unjust not to say it.</p>
<p>That same CRS report notes that Iran&#8217;s claim runs counter to geographic reality, because the Strait of Hormuz comprises the territorial waters of <em>both</em> Iran and Oman.</p>
<p>Which means Iran is not legally the sole owner of this strait. On paper, Iran&#8217;s claim is weak.</p>
<p><strong>Iran&#8217;s lane followed</strong><br />
But paper and water are not the same thing. Whatever the law says, on Thursday nine ships followed Iran&#8217;s lane.</p>
<p>Now to America&#8217;s answer.</p>
<p>On Friday, the US Treasury issued new sanctions. The targets were Iran&#8217;s Shahr Bank, along with individuals, exchange houses and companies spread across several countries, accused of helping Iran move hundreds of millions of dollars clandestinely.</p>
<p>The Treasury said itself that this was its eighth set of sanctions in 2026 against Iran&#8217;s alleged shadow-banking system.</p>
<p>Eighth. Eight times in one year.</p>
<p>Now the question is: if seven did not work, why would the eighth?</p>
<p>That is the problem with sanctions. The first one lands a blow. The second raises the pressure. But what does the eighth do?</p>
<p>The eighth only announces that the previous seven did not work.</p>
<p><strong>The new normal</strong><br />
And the strangest thing of all is the oil price. CNN reported that despite no sign of the war ending, and despite traffic through the strait staying low, oil prices are falling.</p>
<p>So you can see for yourselves. The market is no longer listening to war news. The market has decided this is the new normal.</p>
<p>And once something becomes &#8220;normal&#8221;, the urgency to change it fades.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, on Thursday evening, Abu Dhabi&#8217;s state oil company ADNOC said two of its vessels were attacked while transiting Hormuz. No injuries.</p>
<p>Who attacked them? ADNOC did not say. No group claimed responsibility.</p>
<p>Since the war began, 15 ADNOC vessels have been attacked in total. One crew member killed, 20 injured.</p>
<p>The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is an American ally. And the ally&#8217;s ships are burning every week.</p>
<p>Now a word on something that touches South Asian countries too.</p>
<p><strong>Floating Iranian oil</strong><br />
Early in this war, America adopted a tactic &#8212; temporarily lifting sanctions on roughly 140 million barrels of Iranian oil already floating at sea, so that supply would rise and prices would fall.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s Ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, told Fox News at the time that <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/waltz-says-trump-using-irans-own-oil-strategy-against-drive-down-global-prices">this oil had previously gone mainly to China</a>. Now it could go elsewhere. He named the places &#8212; such as India, Bangladesh or elsewhere</p>
<p>He added that sanctions on the banks would remain in place, so Iran would not see a cent of that money.</p>
<p>Think about what that means. Iran&#8217;s oil gets sold, South Asian countries get to buy it, and Iran does not get the money.</p>
<p>Developing countries are offered cheap oil as bait while Iran&#8217;s own asset is released onto the market, and the proceeds stay locked inside the American banking system.</p>
<p>That is not trade. That is imperial accounting.</p>
<p>Here I will not quote anyone else. I will give you my own opinion.</p>
<p><strong>Paper &#8216;control&#8217; v ships moving</strong><br />
The shape of this war is becoming clear now. Everything Trump is doing is on paper. Sanctions, Truth Social posts, declarations of &#8220;total control&#8221;.</p>
<p>Everything Iran is doing is on the water. Which route, whose permission, which ship and when.</p>
<p>In March, Trump called on China, France, Japan, South Korea and Britain to send ships, &#8220;let us open the strait together&#8221;. Nobody answered.</p>
<p>Five months on, America has drawn a route through that same strait, and the ships are avoiding it and choosing Iran&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Control written on paper, or ships moving on water &#8212; which of the two is real power?</p>
<p>Let me finish with the number I started with.</p>
<p>Thirteen ships. Nine on Iran&#8217;s route.</p>
<p>Trump says the strait is ours. The ships&#8217; captains are saying something else.</p>
<p>And at sea, the captain has the last word.</p>
<p><em>Republished from Iran International under Creative Commons.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre turns 42 &#8211; reflections on a milestone</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/13/fiji-womens-crisis-centre-turns-42-reflections-on-a-milestone/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 11:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Women's Crisis Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQIA+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shamima Ali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre Today, we mark an extraordinary milestone: 42 years of the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre (FWCC). As we reflect on this journey, we are reminded of the countless lives that have intersected with our work since 1984. Over the past four decades, 168,145 survivors have accessed the services of FWCC and its ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre</em></p>
<p>Today, we mark an extraordinary milestone: 42 years of the <a href="https://www.fijiwomen.com/">Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre</a> (FWCC).</p>
<p>As we reflect on this journey, we are reminded of the countless lives that have intersected with our work since 1984. Over the past four decades, 168,145 survivors have accessed the services of FWCC and its branches throughout Fiji.</p>
<p>These include survivors of domestic violence, rape and sexual assault, sexual harassment, child abuse, and other forms of violence and abuse.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Fiji+Women%27s+Crisis+Centre"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Yet numbers alone can never tell the full story.</p>
<p>Statistics cannot capture the fear of a woman escaping violence in the middle of the night. They cannot describe the courage it takes to disclose rape for the first time.</p>
<p>They cannot measure the resilience of survivors who rebuild their lives after trauma, nor reflect the determination of women who refused to give up despite experiencing violence, discrimination, and inequality.</p>
<p>Every individual who walked through our doors came seeking safety, support, and dignity. Many arrived carrying experiences that no one should ever have to endure. Many came believing they were alone. Our role was, and continues to be, to ensure they know they are not.</p>
<p><strong>Principles of feminism</strong><br />
Throughout our history, FWCC’s work has remained firmly grounded in the principles of feminism, women’s human rights, human rights, dignity, equality, and justice. These principles have guided our response to violence against women and girls, shaped our advocacy, informed our research and training, and strengthened our commitment to building a society where all women and girls can live free from violence, discrimination, and inequality.</p>
<p>While our primary focus has been addressing violence against women and girls, our services have always recognised the diversity of the communities we serve. Over the past 42 years, we have worked with women in all their diversity, including women from rural and urban communities, women with disabilities, young women, older women, women from different ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, and women of different sexual orientations and gender identities.</p>
<p>We have also supported men and boys affected by violence and abuse, as well as members of the LGBTQI+ community who have sought counselling, support, information, and protection.</p>
<p>Looking back, the impact of FWCC extends far beyond the people who directly accessed our services. It can be seen in the women who found safety and rebuilt their lives. It can be seen in the police officers, health workers, teachers, community leaders, faith leaders, and advocates who received training and developed a deeper understanding of violence against women and women’s human rights.</p>
<p>It is reflected in laws, policies, and public conversations that have been influenced by decades of advocacy, research, and evidence-based work. It is reflected in generations of women and girls who now know that they have rights, that violence is never their fault, and that support is available.</p>
<p><strong>Centre&#8217;s leadership</strong><br />
No reflection on the journey of the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre would be complete without acknowledging the leadership of our coordinator, Shamima Ali. For more than four decades, she has been the most influential voice for women’s human rights in Fiji and the Pacific. Her unwavering commitment to ending violence against women and girls, advancing gender equality, and holding institutions accountable has helped shape not only the direction of FWCC but also the national conversation on women’s rights and human rights.</p>
<p>Under her leadership, FWCC has grown from a small feminist organisation into a nationally and internationally respected centre for crisis intervention, advocacy, research, training, and feminist leadership. Through times of political uncertainty, social resistance, and changing public attitudes, she has remained steadfast in speaking out against injustice and ensuring that survivors’ voices and experiences remain at the centre of our work.</p>
<p>Some people witness history and others help shape it. Shamima Ali has done both. Thank you, Sham.</p>
<p>We also acknowledge with gratitude the staff, counsellors, trainers, volunteers, trustees, supporters, allies, donors, partners, and communities who have stood with us over the last four decades. Your dedication, commitment, and belief in this work have made these achievements possible.</p>
<p>We also extend our sincere appreciation to the Australian government through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), and the New Zealand government through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT), for their longstanding partnership and support. Their contributions have strengthened efforts to advance women’s human rights and respond to violence against women and girls in Fiji and across the Pacific.</p>
<p>As we reflect on 42 years, we are also mindful of those whose experiences remain unseen and unheard. Their stories remind us that violence against women remains one of the most urgent human rights challenges facing our nation.</p>
<p>That is why our work remains as important today as it was in 1984.</p>
<p>We do not mark anniversaries simply to celebrate longevity. We mark them to honour feminist persistence and resilience.</p>
<p>Our dream has always been to work ourselves out of business. Until that day comes, the work continues.</p>
<p><em>Republished from the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre website, 13 August 2026.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain’s Big Brother state is already here – we just don’t realise it yet</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/11/britains-big-brother-state-is-already-here-we-just-dont-realise-it-yet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 06:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-protest laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authoritarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaire media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debanking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocaust scholars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human rights groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli atrocities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Corbyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While the public is encouraged to blame immigrants, Muslims, the left, or &#8220;Israel haters&#8221;, the UK state is racing to erect a scaffolding of control to protect itself before we wake up to the deception, writes Jonathan Cook. ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook When is it possible to declare that a society has moved from liberal ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>While the public is encouraged to blame immigrants, Muslims, the left, or &#8220;Israel haters&#8221;, the UK state is racing to erect a scaffolding of control to protect itself before we wake up to the deception</em><strong>, </strong><em>writes <strong>Jonathan Cook</strong>.</em></p>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Jonathan Cook</em></p>
<p>When is it possible to declare that a society has moved from liberal democracy, however imperfectly realised, to authoritarian rule?</p>
<p>Is there a moment when it is suddenly obvious the change has occurred? Does authoritarianism announce its arrival?</p>
<p>Or is it a process that gradually unfolds, where restraints on executive power are dismantled piece by piece until the tide cannot be reversed?</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Jonathan+Cook"><strong>READ MORE: </strong>Other Jonathan Cook articles</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide">Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Is the turn to authoritarianism something that can only be understood after the event, when all opportunities to halt the slide have been missed?</p>
<p>And how do we admit to ourselves that we have been stripped of our most basic and cherished freedoms &#8212; of speech, assembly and protest &#8212; when we are no longer free to speak, meet or protest?</p>
<p>The unpalatable truth is that Britain is already far down this path. And if you are unaware of the earthquake that has been taking place, that may be because &#8212; just as you might expect when authoritarianism comes calling &#8212; the very first to be smothered are the voices sounding the alarm.</p>
<p>A media owned by billionaires and the state &#8212; the parties that, in an age of growing popular discontent, have most to gain from the accretion of executive power and the silencing of dissent &#8212; have no reason to illuminate the encroaching darkness.</p>
<p><strong>Foot work for authoritarianism</strong><br />
An ostensible Labour government under the outgoing Keir Starmer has done much of the foot work to usher in the new, ominous political climate.</p>
<p>It was precisely Starmer’s credentials as a human rights lawyer that provided the British state with the cover story it needed for an unprecedented assault on the freedoms fought for by earlier generations.</p>
<p>There are few signs that his successors, whether it be a new figurehead in the genocide-supporting Labour Party or Nigel Farage’s immigrant-bashing Reform, will change direction.</p>
<p>The logic driving Britain’s slide towards authoritarianism is being set not just by politicians, but by a British establishment that needs to sell its collusion in genocide and illegal wars abroad and to find easy scapegoats &#8212; immigrants &#8212; to blame for its failures at home.</p>
<p>The job of the main political parties, reliant on billionaire donors who also own the corporate media, is to shore up these narratives.</p>
<p>It was Starmer’s Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, who incautiously gave the clearest expression to the British state’s vision of our future.</p>
<p>In a speech in January she laid out her ambition to harness new developments in AI to create an all-powerful, all-seeing “Big Brother” surveillance state of the kind foretold by George Orwell in his dystopian novel <em>1984</em>.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Panopticon&#8217;, the perfect prison</strong><br />
Mahmood even compared this future to the “panopticon” &#8212; a reference to 18th-century philosopher Jeremy Bentham’s perfect prison: a central watchtower (the state) surrounded by a circle of windowed cells where the inmates (the public) would be visible at all times.</p>
<p>Bentham understood that this was not just about physical control. As he observed, the sense of being constantly observed would be a “new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind”. The inmates would police their own behaviour to avoid punishment.</p>
<p>Starmer’s successor, Andy Burnham, is reportedly keen to keep Mahmood a key figure in his government. But this isn’t about a single government minister.</p>
<p>Mahmood is the symptom of a deeper malaise, not its cause. The architecture of the new systems of control, as well as the erosion of freedoms and the cultural traditions that supported them, were already well advanced when she was appointed to the Home Office.</p>
<p>Whoever holds the reins of power in the months and years to come will be able to exploit these existing powers to the maximum, and then extend them further.</p>
<p>Once the spirit of authoritarianism takes hold, it becomes ever harder to stuff it back into the box. Only concerted mass protest can remind the state where ultimate power resides. And it is precisely this kind of protest that is being demonised and criminalised one step at a time.</p>
<p>If it is possible to identify a single moment when the new authoritarianism moved out of the shadows, it was some 15 years ago. That was the moment the state launched its protracted campaign against Julian Assange to vilify and incarcerate him.</p>
<p><strong>Incensed US over war crimes</strong><br />
The founder of the whistleblowing platform WikiLeaks had incensed the United States and its loyal British sidekick by publishing details of war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq both wanted to be kept secret.</p>
<p>It was probably no coincidence that, at the time, Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service and making repeated trips to meet Washington’s most senior law officers. Contrary to protocols, records of these discussions were destroyed by his officials.</p>
<p>We will never know what instructions Starmer was given by the US regarding Assange. But a possible clue survived the further, and highly irregular, destruction by Starmer’s department of related correspondence between UK and Swedish prosecutors from that time.</p>
<p>One of the few surviving emails is revealing. It shows that Sweden was considering dropping an investigation into Assange for lack of evidence, as he was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London fearful of what lay in store.</p>
<p>Starmer’s staff, who were supposed to be neutral arbiters between Sweden and Assange’s legal team, angrily told the Swedes: “Don’t you dare get cold feet!!!”</p>
<p>In another email, the same CPS official told Swedish counterparts: “Please do not think this case is being dealt with as just another extradition.&#8221;</p>
<p>Later, with the active connivance of the UK and its courts, the US showed its true hand. Washington began extradition proceedings on the preposterous grounds that Assange had committed “espionage” by publishing details of its war crimes.</p>
<p><strong>Caged in prison</strong><br />
Assange was caged in a high-security prison in London for years, often unable to meet his lawyers, his health failing, on a trumped-up, nakedly political charge.</p>
<p>This was a terrifying, unprecedented assault on the right of journalists to publish evidence of state wrongdoing in the public interest. And yet the billionaire-owned media could barely stifle their yawns.</p>
<p>There was a two-fold gain from Assange’s decade-long abuse and the trampling of his legal rights.</p>
<p>First, it established a very visible precedent in which the rule of law was turned on its head. The roles of victim and victimiser were reversed.</p>
<p>Assange, who had published incontrovertible evidence of US and British war crimes, was the one behind bars. British officials who approved and hid those crimes not only evaded justice but were free to hound and smear Assange.</p>
<p>This has been the theme ever since, as the British state has intensified its curbs on speech and protest, with Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians often serving as the testing ground for authorising this new crackdown.</p>
<p>In the second half of the 2010s, Jeremy Corbyn &#8212; Starmer’s predecessor as Labour leader &#8212; found himself and his supporters roundly vilified as “antisemites”.</p>
<p><strong>Forewarning of the future</strong><br />
Why? Because they tried to bring attention to Israel’s criminal actions &#8212; a forewarning of what was to come, as Israel unleashed what legal experts, Holocaust scholars, human rights groups and United Nations investigators have all concluded is a genocide in Gaza.</p>
<p>In a properly functioning democracy, those who smeared Corbyn and other critics of Israel would have been permanently discredited.</p>
<p>Instead, UK officials &#8212; the same officials colluding in Israel’s current crimes by shipping arms to Israel, by carrying out surveillance flights to guide Israel’s bombing campaigns against Gaza’s civilians, and by offering diplomatic cover &#8212; simply stepped up the demonisation campaign.</p>
<p>As millions of Britons took to the streets, the Starmer government &#8212; and the British state behind it &#8212; not only labelled them as antisemites but radically rewrote the statute books to criminalise opposition to Israel’s genocide.</p>
<p>Direct action group Palestine Action, which had been targeting Israeli arms factories operating on UK soil, was proscribed as a “terrorist” group equivalent to al-Qaeda and Islamic State.</p>
<p>Holding placards protesting the genocide, as thousands of respectable British citizens did, became “support for terrorism”, risking a jail term of up to 14 years.</p>
<p>Reality was once again inverted.</p>
<p><strong>UK supports state terrorism</strong><br />
Britain continues to actively support Israeli state terrorism.</p>
<p>But it was those ringing the alarm &#8212; those trying to stop these shipments, those opposed to British collusion in Israeli state terrorism, or those simply appalled by the undermining of basic rights to protest &#8212; who were arrested and charged as &#8220;terrorists&#8221;.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, documents show Elbit Systems continues to enjoy unrestricted access to British government officials.</p>
<p>Second, in stigmatising and isolating Assange for publishing details of US and UK war crimes, the British state was able to draw its own fake distinction between “good” and “bad” journalism &#8212; a distinction the billionaire-owned media was only too happy to embrace.</p>
<p>Assange, whose independent platform WikiLeaks had held Washington and London’s feet to the fire for committing war crimes, had in the process shamed the establishment media for their unwillingness to do likewise.</p>
<p>He exposed the extent to which corporate journalists, dependent on access to the rich and powerful for stories, conspire in the covert, unaccountable ways power is exercised by the state.</p>
<p>The media are not watchdogs; they are lap dogs, representing the interests of the billionaire class.</p>
<p><strong>Independent media not tolerated</strong><br />
The British state &#8212; and its security services &#8212; made clear they would not tolerate truly independent or critical media that could expose their hypocrisies or bring them to book.</p>
<p>In response, the billionaire-owned media not only hung Assange out to dry. It joined the government in a chorus of claims that independent outlets were either peddling “fake news” or serving as “Kremlin assets” spreading “disinformation“.</p>
<p>It amplified the pressure from politicians on social media platforms, the billionaires’ new plaything, to tighten their algorithms to hide independent journalists, and stymie these dangerous new competitors in the battle for truth.</p>
<p>Similarly, corporate media cheerled the government’s decision to ban <em>Russia Today</em>, the Russian state’s news channel. It quickly became all but impossible for UK audiences to hear Russia’s version of events in the mainstream media, as Britain and European states built the case for permanent confrontation with Moscow.</p>
<p>The European Union imposed an even more draconian ban &#8212; upheld last month by the EU’s Court of Justice &#8212; that makes it a criminal offence to repeat any information reported by <em>RT</em>, and other banned outlets, even if demonstrably true. The law’s purpose is to supposedly “protect public order and safety”.</p>
<p>In recent weeks, two prominent US commentators, Cenk Uygur and Hasan Piker, have been denied entry to the UK over their criticisms of Israel. Uygur was due to speak at an Oxford University debate.</p>
<p>In this new authoritarian climate, truth is defined as whatever the state wants their citizens to know. Meanwhile, disinformation &#8212; “Russian propaganda” or “antisemitism” &#8212; is whatever those same states insist their citizenry must not hear.</p>
<p><strong>Brazen reversal of Enlightenment</strong><br />
This is a brazen reversal of 350 years of the Western Enlightenment, with its professed belief both in the primacy of reason and that ideas must be tested through debate and critical scrutiny.</p>
<p>Now it matters not what is being said, but only who is saying it.</p>
<p>And unsurprisingly, the billionaire-owned, Western media has endorsed this new regime. After all, its voice &#8212; representing the interests of the super-rich &#8212; is guaranteed a hearing.</p>
<p>No surprise, then, that this same privileged media corps has continued to meekly accept its exclusion from Gaza by Israel as the biggest crime in modern history unfolds &#8212; even now, in the midst of a supposed ceasefire that Israel keeps breaking.</p>
<p>Because what matters is who is allowed to speak: Israel, not Gaza’s Palestinians, whether what Israel says is true or, as invariably turns out to be the case, a lie.</p>
<p>In line with this precept, the billionaire-owned media has barely raised a murmur as Israel has slaughtered Gaza’s journalists in unprecedented numbers &#8212; killing more of them than in two world wars, Vietnam, the Yugoslav wars and Afghanistan combined.</p>
<p>The lives of Palestinian journalists &#8212; like the reporting they have had to do alone under Israeli bombardment &#8212; count for nothing in the Western media because of who they are.</p>
<p><strong>Genocide &#8216;erased as a crime&#8217;</strong><br />
Genocide &#8212; the what &#8212; has been erased as a crime because it is we &#8212; the West &#8212; who are helping to carry it out.</p>
<p>The Committee to Protect Journalists, reportedly facing a political and donor backlash, scrapped last year its annual Global Impunity Index &#8212; which measured where journalists are murdered with impunity &#8212; after it became clear Israel would top the rankings.</p>
<p>Now the same committee is being accused of caving in to these pressures by raising doubts about who counts as a journalist in Gaza &#8212; doubts that will serve to embolden Israel, which claims that Palestinian journalists, indeed all Palestinians, are terrorists in disguise.</p>
<p>The who has to be rewritten because the what cannot be denied.</p>
<p>The same story is unfolding in the UK, where independent British journalists have been detained at the airport or had their homes raided at dawn by counterterrorism police for “wrong-think” about the Gaza genocide and British complicity in it. They too face up to 14 years in jail.</p>
<p>That has sent a chilling message to other journalists, those that lack the protection of a billionaire patron or the state, about what can be said.</p>
<p>None of this is, or will be, confined to Gaza. The upending of Enlightenment values, as should be clear by now, is part of a much bigger political project to normalise and entrench this creeping authoritarianism.</p>
<p><strong>Hard to reverse precedent</strong><br />
The proscription of Palestine Action and placard-holding has paved the way for the British state to designate any opponent &#8212; challenging its lawbreaking or contesting its right to dictate truth &#8212; as a criminal or a supporter of terrorism. A precedent has been set, and now approved by the UK courts, that will be hard to reverse.</p>
<p>The state has many tools at its disposal, some of which it is already wielding, again to no protest from billionaire-owned media “watchdogs”.</p>
<p>A particularly powerful one is “debanking”: forcing individuals or groups who disrupt the narrative of Western state moral and legal authority out of the financial system, driving them into a kind of purdah that makes it near-impossible for them to function in the modern, Western world.</p>
<p>Notably again, Assange and WikiLeaks were an early victim of the use of debanking as a political weapon. Washington imposed sanctions in late 2010, shortly after WikiLeaks exposed US and British war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, cutting off almost all of its donor revenue.</p>
<p>Sanctions &#8212; what some describe as a “financial death penalty” &#8212; have already been imposed on several judges and staff of the International Criminal Court over the issuing of an arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for committing crimes against humanity in Gaza.</p>
<p>UN legal expert Francesca Albanese, at the forefront of highlighting Western complicity in Israel’s genocide, has also been debanked.</p>
<p>In Britain, Palestinian and Islamic-run charities have long faced harsh restrictions on their ability to operate financially, usually on the basis of claims that they may be funnelling donations to proscribed groups.</p>
<p>But this has gradually expanded to mainstream Palestine solidarity organisations and to individuals caught up in the ban on Palestine Action.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Canary</em> debanked</strong><br />
In an even more disturbing, if predictable, development, Lloyds Bank has now debanked <em>The</em> <em>Canary</em>, a leftwing publication whose criticisms of Labour’s capture by Big Business have long proved a thorn in the party bureacracy’s side. <em>The Canary</em> can no longer pay staff, and its news operation is in jeopardy.</p>
<p>This is the same <em>Canary</em> that the Labour Together project led by Morgan McSweeney &#8212; who propelled Starmer to power on behalf of the billionaire-friendly, pro-genocide Labour right &#8212; identified early on as a threat. His mantra was reportedly: “Destroy <em>The Canary</em> or <em>The Canary</em> destroys us.”</p>
<p>As investigative journalist Paul Holden sets out in his book <em>The Fraud,</em> which documents Labour Together’s covert, law-breaking operations, McSweeney almost succeeded in destroying <em>The Canary</em>. He created an astroturf group, Stop Funding Fake News, that lobbied advertisers to boycott the publication.</p>
<p>Labour Together under McSweeney’s successor, Josh Simons, would then launch a smear campaign on Holden and refer him to British security services as a supposed Kremlin asset.</p>
<p>Like a bad penny, Simons has turned up again, this time giving up his Makerfield seat for Andy Burnham to return to Westminster. Simons is now one of Burnham’s political advisers.</p>
<p>This systematic assault on the right to scrutinise the British state’s actions has been extended to the legal profession too.</p>
<p>Last month, Dan Kovalik, a respected US human rights lawyer and professor, was detained at Liverpool airport by counterterrorism police and questioned over his criticisms of Western foreign policy in Gaza and Iran.</p>
<p><strong>Detained by police</strong><br />
Fahad Ansari, a British human rights lawyer, was detained by police last year on return to the UK from a family holiday in Ireland under Schedule 7 of the draconian Terrorism Act of 2000.</p>
<p>Both men had their electronic devices seized, despite protests that this was unlawful and violated their privileged lawyer-client communications.</p>
<p>Ansari’s detention appears to be a blatant act of political retaliation and intimidation. He had made legal representations challenging a Home Office decision in 2021 to expand the proscription of Hamas to its political wing. Hamas has never launched a military operation in Britain.</p>
<p>For the submission, Ansari had assembled a group of experts to argue that the expanded proscription &#8212; long desired by Israel &#8212; was having a profoundly chilling effect on the work of lawyers, scholars, human rights groups and journalists in documenting and discussing Israeli crimes in Gaza.</p>
<p>Five UN legal experts wrote protesting the abuse of Ansari’s rights as a lawyer, warning that “such measures threaten to criminalise, stigmatise and have chilling effects against lawyers and legal associations carrying out lawful work in national security and counter-terrorism matters”.</p>
<p>That seems to be precisely the point. Harassing lawyers is a feature, not a bug, of Britain’s new authoritarianism.</p>
<p>An even more visible victim of this new assault on the legal profession is the highly respected barrister Rajiv Menon.</p>
<p><strong>Key human rights cases</strong><br />
He has worked on some of the most important human rights cases of modern times, challenging failures and abuses of power by the state in relation to the murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence, the deaths of nearly 100 Liverpool football fans at Hillsborough, and the 72 victims of the Grenfell Tower fire.</p>
<p>He is currently facing contempt of court proceedings after making a closing speech in January that persuaded a jury not to convict six Palestine Action defendants of any of the charges brought by the British state against them. In 2024, the six had targeted an Elbit factory.</p>
<p>It is believed to be the first time that a lawyer has been prosecuted for contempt of court over a closing speech. Garden Court Chambers, where Menon has practised for three decades, said the proceedings had sent “shock waves through the legal profession”.</p>
<p>It warned of a severe chilling effect on barristers, who might be more reluctant to mount a strong defence, especially in politically charged trials, for fear of reprisals.</p>
<p>All of this should be seen in the context of the government’s equally unprecedented moves to erode the cornerstone legal principle of the right to trial by jury.</p>
<p>Authoritarian states permit no meaningful restraints on their ability to impose their will. Independent-minded lawyers and juries are just such a brake.</p>
<p>But perhaps the most sustained assault by the British state has been on the rights to protest and assembly, making it increasingly dangerous to express a view in the public space.</p>
<p><strong>2 million in street power</strong><br />
Since some two million people took to the streets to oppose Britain’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, new ways have been sought to restrict the ability of ordinary citizens to raise their voice against the abuse of governmental and state power.</p>
<p>Recent legislation allows police to ban protests because they are “too noisy” or cause “serious unease”. Disruption has been redefined to now include hindrance to any daily activity. Protests can be barred if they have a “cumulative” impact.</p>
<p>These are all inherent features of protest. The mass demonstrations against Britain’s illegal attack on Iraq were noisy, disruptive and repeated &#8212; as have been the marches against Britain’s collusion in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.</p>
<p>By judging the legality of protest according to these selective and largely subjective criteria, the state has given the police huge latitude to decide which protests should be criminalised and which allowed. It is hardly surprising then that the police are currently concentrating their efforts on the anti-genocide marches, which highlight British collusion in Israel’s crimes.</p>
<p>Facial recogition technology &#8212; pioneered by Israel against Palestinians &#8212; is being rolled out too, normalising the Panopticon state so beloved by Mahmood.</p>
<p>Where is all of this leading? The answer is to a new piece of legislation that was hurried through Parliament by the Home Secretary.</p>
<p>The National Security (State Threats) Act gives the state unprecedented powers to proscribe groups, as it did with Palestine Action, but now without having to claim to have evidence of a terrorist threat.</p>
<p><strong>Claiming a &#8216;hostlle&#8217; group</strong><br />
The Home Secretary can make such a designation unilaterally, without any parliamentary oversight, simply because he or she claims the group is a “hostile” foreign state actor that poses a threat to national security or public safety.</p>
<p>Mahmood has already done so with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), effectively Iran’s military.</p>
<p>Further, anyone who works with or receives a “material benefit” &#8212; defined to include “information” &#8212; from a proscribed group can be jailed for up to 14 years. That includes expressing support for the group or sharing information it has provided.</p>
<p>Simply hosting an event where someone expresses support for the group could open one to prosecution, as could posting something on social media that the British state claims is a hostile foreign state “talking point” &#8212; whether or not the information is true.</p>
<p>Once again, this is an assault on the most fundamental of Enlightenment values.</p>
<p>In the National Security Act, it matters only who is passing on the information, not what the information is, or whether it is truthful. There is no public interest defence, such as exposure of criminality by the British state or its allies.</p>
<p>There is no exemption for journalists, lawyers, scholars or human rights groups. It will be impossible for them to do the most essential part of their job: digging out information, testing claims from one side against the other’s, and allowing audiences to determine the truth.</p>
<p><strong>Baring of journalists</strong><br />
Assuming Hamas is declared a hostile foreign actor, as seems all but certain, journalists will be barred from collecting details of Palestinian casualties from Gaza’s Health Ministry or speak to doctors there. Why? Because the Hamas government runs the Health Ministry and hospitals.</p>
<p>Worse, it would be impossible for journalists to visit Gaza to investigate Israeli crimes &#8212; something that will delight Israel &#8212; because such a visit would need to be organised through the Hamas government. To do so would risk 14 years in jail.</p>
<p>The same will be true for reporting from Iran or Russia, if the Home Secretary so decides.</p>
<p>The only apparent carve-out will be for journalists who get approval from the British government beforehand.</p>
<p>That should ensure that only the most compliant, access-driven journalists, belonging to state and billionaire-owned media, will be able to engage with “hostile” foreign actors &#8212; in ways the British state can be sure will best represent its interests.</p>
<p>Under this new law, the search for truth, and potentially the truth itself, will be criminalised.</p>
<p>The National Security Act systematises all the other developments we noted earlier. It gives the state carte blanche to criminalise anyone who scrutinises or challenges its moral or legal authority.</p>
<p><strong>Search for the truth</strong><br />
Who should be in uproar over this monstrous legislative assault on the right to search for truth, to hold the state accountable, to act as a watchdog on the abuse of power?</p>
<p>If the billionaire-owned media did any of the above, news outlets would be leading the pushback. As it is, they are mostly silent &#8212; because they do none of these things.</p>
<p>It will be independent journalists, commentators, lawyers and human rights activists who will be picked off one by one, sending a message to everyone else to keep their heads down.</p>
<p>Starved of real information and critical scrutiny of the British state’s actions, the public, so it is hoped, will become more ignorant, more docile, more passive as their rights are steadily stripped away.</p>
<p>As the climate crisis intensifies, as resource wars accelerate, as austerity at home bites deeper, the finger will be pointed not at the real culprits &#8212; the super-rich, their media and the captured state &#8212; but at earlier victims of the West: those fleeing from the wars we initiated, from an increasingly unstable climate our inflated consumption provoked, and from a paucity of resources following centuries of colonial theft.</p>
<p>While we are encouraged to blame “the immigrants”, or “the Muslims”, or “the left”, or “the Israel haters”, the state is in a race to erect a scaffolding of control to protect itself before we wake up to the deception.</p>
<p>Time is running out on all fronts. The lack of urgency to address these crises is not because the crises don’t exist, but because our passivity has been engineered. The truth is we are already in the Panopticon, and our minds are already deeply fashioned for obedience.</p>
<p><em><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><a href="https://twitter.com/jonathan_k_cook/">Jonathan Cook</a> is a writer, journalist and self-appointed media critic and author of many books about Palestine. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. This article was first published by Middle East Eye and republished from the author’s Substack with permission.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Segal State &#8211; the public office Australia never voted for</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/10/the-segal-state-the-public-office-australia-never-voted-for/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Albanese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antisemitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Labor Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegitimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jillian Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice to Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jillian Segal holds power over what Australians may say, teach, report and believe. No election gave it to her. No Parliament ratified it. Nothing like her office has existed in the federation. Labor built it. The Coalition wants it bigger. Nobody asked you. Andrew Brown  reports for Michael West Media. Part one. SPECIAL REPORT: By ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Jillian Segal holds power over what Australians may say, teach, report and believe. No election gave it to her. No Parliament ratified it. Nothing like her office has existed in the federation. Labor built it. The Coalition wants it bigger. Nobody asked you. Andrew Brown  reports for <strong>Michael West Media</strong>. Part one.</em></p>
<p><strong>SPECIAL REPORT:</strong> <em>By Andrew Brown</em></p>
<p>Remember the referendum in which Australians voted to create a Voice to Parliament for Israel?</p>
<p>You don’t. It never happened. We got one anyway.</p>
<p>In 2023, 60.06 percent of Australians rejected a constitutionally recognised Voice for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. A body that could make representations only on matters concerning the people whose ancestors have been here 60,000 years.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Bondi+Royal+Commission"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Reports on the Bondi Royal Commission</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Too much, the No campaign shrieked. Division. Privilege. Special treatment.</p>
<p>Nine months later, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese handed Jillian Segal what the Voice never dreamed of asking for. Not a right to be heard. Power. No election. No parliamentary vote. No hearing.</p>
<p>A three-year commission reporting personally to the Prime Minister, with a mandate reaching into every campus, newsroom, classroom, gallery, charity, arts contract and visa file in the Commonwealth.</p>
<blockquote><p>Australia has never seen an office like this. Not once in 125 years.</p></blockquote>
<p>We have been here before and we said no. In 1951, Robert Menzies asked Australians for power to outlaw communism and police political belief. Even Menzies put it to a referendum, because a democracy does not seize control of ideas by fiat.</p>
<p>A frightened people refused him.</p>
<p>That refusal became a founding settlement of this country. The state does not decide what citizens may think.</p>
<p><strong>A captain’s call<br />
</strong>Albanese tore up that settlement with a press release. No referendum. No bill. No debate. One man appointed one advocate, and the checkpoint went up.</p>
<p>An open society grants authority over its citizens three ways &#8212; election, appointment ratified by Parliament, or a court, ruling in public, subject to appeal.</p>
<p>Segal’s power arrived by none of them. The word for that is illegitimate. Not unlawful. Worse. Lawful, and</p>
<blockquote><p>authorised by nobody but one man.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do not look to the opposition for rescue. The Coalition demanded a national antisemitism crackdown before Labor delivered one, and its only complaint since is that the checkpoint is too small and the universities let off too lightly.</p>
<p>Resistance has come from the crossbench alone. When both major parties agree on machinery this size, the voters have been deleted from the equation. Neither will ask whether Segal’s authority is legitimate, because both intend to use it. That is imposition.</p>
<blockquote><p>That is Australia in 2026.</p></blockquote>
<p>Say it plainly. Antisemitism is real. It is sometimes murderous. Jewish Australians deserve safety, delivered without mercy by police, courts and criminal law against anyone who menaces a synagogue or a schoolchild.</p>
<p>Safety does not require a private advocate enthroned above the speech of 27 million people. That is not protection. That is capture.</p>
<p><strong>The wrong person, chosen on purpose<br />
</strong>Segal ran the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. She chaired the Australia Israel Chamber of Commerce. Israel lobby groups.</p>
<p>Advocacy for Israel is her right as a private citizen. It is also the precise reason no honest government would put her near an office ruling on the boundary between antisemitism and criticism of Israel. Albanese did not blunder into the conflict. He shopped for it.</p>
<p>Her selection sits buried under Freedom of Information redactions. Up to $16.9 million was approved for the Envoy offices. You were not asked. You were not told. You are paying her a reported $1070 a day, and Home Affairs refuses to tell you her salary.</p>
<p><strong>The machinery of a small authoritarian state<br />
</strong>Jillian Segal produced a 20-page plan. Thirteen recommendations. Forty nine actions. And behind them, nothing. No published evidence base. No consultation paper. No regulatory impact statement.</p>
<p>Not one piece of credible research showing any of it would prevent a single antisemitic incident. For all the rigour on display, the plan might as well have been drafted at her Point Piper kitchen table. In December 2025, the government swallowed it whole anyway, named it a programme of work led by Segal, and pledged action on every recommendation, unquestioned.</p>
<p>Read the list and ask which country you are living in. Media monitoring. A university report card. Withholding university funding. Terminating academic grants. Stripping charities of their status. Screening visa applicants for their opinions. Ideological training for the public service. Cancellation clauses so arts grants can be ripped back from artists who say the wrong thing about the wrong state.</p>
<p>The fig leaf is that Segal cannot personally cancel anything. Her office helps define the offence, grades the accused and recommends the sentence.</p>
<p>Ministers supply the muscle and the deniability. Prosecutor, judge and probation service in one unelected body, answerable only to the man who created it. Build this for any other subject and Australians would name it instantly.</p>
<blockquote><p>A censorship ministry.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>A rigged definition, wired into everything</strong><br />
At the centre sits the contested IHRA definition, whose own lead drafter has protested its use as an enforcement weapon. The ABC, SBS, Amnesty International and hundreds of scholars warn its Israel-related examples can melt criticism of a state into hatred of a people. Segal bolts it into government regardless.</p>
<p>From January 2027, universities must define antisemitism under an enforceable national standard. Then Segal’s report card marks whether the definition is appropriate, while her plan demands IHRA everywhere. Choice, the way a loan shark offers choice.</p>
<p>No vice-chancellor will need to be ordered to censor.</p>
<blockquote><p>They will censor themselves in advance.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is only the architecture. Then Segal took an oath and showed what it is for.</p>
<p>And hold one question in your head overnight, the one polite Australia refuses to ask. Why does one form of racism summon a ministry, a report card and $130 million, while First Nations families waited 30 years and 590 deaths in custody for recommendations nobody implemented?</p>
<p>Why machinery for one hatred and a media release for the rest? You are not supposed to ask. Ask anyway.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/12/the-segal-state-2-the-mask-the-children-the-money-and-the-answer/">Part 2: the mask off under oath</a>. </strong>The plan for your children. The $50,000 nobody will investigate. And the question answered.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/andrew-brown/"> Andrew Brown</a> is a Sydney businessman in the health products sector, former Deputy Mayor of Mosman and Palestine peace activist. This article was first published by Michael West Media and is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The key Hormuz question that everybody is avoiding</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/10/the-key-hormuz-question-that-everybody-is-avoiding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbas Araghchi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panama Canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic routes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suez Canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western powers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Special Correspondent When you hear &#8220;Iran&#8221; and &#8220;Strait of Hormuz&#8221; in the same sentence, what comes to mind? Tensions? Threats? Chaos? &#8230;That’s exactly what the MSM news media want you to think with their headlines. READ MORE: Trump says US only ‘semi-negotiating’ with Iran; Israel rejects Gaza plan Oil prices climb as Iranian demands cloud ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Special Correspondent</em></p>
<p>When you hear &#8220;Iran&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strait_of_Hormuz">Strait of Hormuz</a>&#8221; in the same sentence, what comes to mind?</p>
<p>Tensions? Threats? Chaos? &#8230;That’s exactly what the MSM news media want you to think with their headlines.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/8/10/iran-war-live-us-semi-negotiating-with-tehran-israel-rejects-gaza-plan"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Trump says US only ‘semi-negotiating’ with Iran; Israel rejects Gaza plan</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/8/10/oil-prices-climb-as-iranian-demands-cloud-outlook-for-strait-of-hormuz">Oil prices climb as Iranian demands cloud outlook for Strait of Hormuz</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">Other War on Iran reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But here’s what they don&#8217;t tell you:</p>
<p>Iran let the world sail through that waterway for free for more than 40 years &#8212; no tolls, no fees. No questions asked.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, other nations have been charging billions from ships using their strategic routes and nobody bats an eye.</p>
<p>So why the sudden outrage against Tehran? And more importantly, what changed?</p>
<p><strong>Cashing in big time</strong><br />
Meanwhile, what about other nations? They’re cashing in big time:</p>
<p>Suez Canal &#8212; billions in fees yearly<br />
Panama Canal &#8212; charges for ships of up to $1 million per passage<br />
Turkish Straits &#8212; toll booths are alive and well</p>
<p>So when Western powers point fingers at Tehran, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has one simple question:</p>
<p>“Why are we the only ones painted as the ‘bad guys’ when we’ve been the most generous?”</p>
<figure id="attachment_131829" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131829" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-131829" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide.png" alt="Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi" width="680" height="445" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide-300x196.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide-642x420.png 642w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131829" class="wp-caption-text">Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi . . . asking for a fair debate. Image: Bueze</figcaption></figure>
<p>He’s not denying tensions. He’s not dodging responsibility.</p>
<p>He’s just asking for a fair debate, not a one-sided blame game.</p>
<p>Iran didn&#8217;t just wake up one day and decide to flex its muscles.</p>
<p><strong>Weakening a nation</strong><br />
The United States has:</p>
<ul>
<li>Attacked Iran illegally and without justification;</li>
<li>Imposed crippling sanctions;</li>
<li>Sent warships to their doorstep;</li>
<li>Tried to cut off their oil lifeline; and</li>
<li>Worked to shrink Iran&#8217;s influence in the region.</li>
</ul>
<p>When you spend 47 years trying to weaken a nation, don&#8217;t be surprised when they use what they have to push back.</p>
<p>Every sanction, every threat, every military move &#8212; the hostile campaign didn&#8217;t break Iran.</p>
<p>It reminded the country of 93 million people how powerful their position really is.</p>
<p>The Strait of Hormuz isn&#8217;t just water.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s 20 percent of the world&#8217;s oil supply passing through daily (before that US-Israel attack on Iran on February 28). And when you corner a country that controls Hormuz,<br />
it will start charging politically, not just financially.</p>
<p>Iran isn&#8217;t collecting tolls because they want to. They&#8217;re collecting because the US gave them leverage by trying to break them.</p>
<p>If you spent years poking a lion, why are you shocked when it roars and starts charging admission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashneel Jaynesh Prasad: Fiji’s flag – a conversation we must have</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/10/ashneel-jaynesh-prasad-fijis-flag-a-conversation-we-must-have/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial baggage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colonial symbols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girmitya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Island communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national flags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Jack]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Ashneel Jaynesh Prasad There are some conversations a nation keeps postponing because they are uncomfortable. Changing Fiji’s flag is one of them. We came close to having that conversation in 2015 and 2016. A nationwide design competition was launched, thousands of submissions poured in, opinions were fierce, and for a brief moment it ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Ashneel Jaynesh Prasad</em></p>
<p>There are some conversations a nation keeps postponing because they are uncomfortable. Changing Fiji’s flag is one of them.</p>
<p>We came close to having that conversation in 2015 and 2016. A nationwide design competition was launched, thousands of submissions poured in, opinions were fierce, and for a brief moment it felt as though Fiji was genuinely asking itself who it wanted to be. Then the conversation stalled.</p>
<p>After Fiji’s historic victory in rugby sevens at the 2016 Rio Olympics, the government announced that the flag would remain unchanged. Since then, the issue has largely disappeared from public debate.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/two-dates-one-wound-what-girmit-day-means-fiji-s-future"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Two dates, one wound: What Girmit Day means for Fiji’s future</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=The+Fiji+Flag">Other Fiji flag reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But postponing a conversation does not resolve it. If anything, it only leaves unfinished business for another generation. I believe that generation is ours.</p>
<p>I say this not because I dislike our current flag. Quite the opposite. Like millions of Fijians, I have watched it rise at schools, sporting events, military ceremonies and international competitions. I have sung the national anthem beneath it. I have seen athletes wrap themselves in it with tears streaming down their faces.</p>
<p>Those memories are real and meaningful. But memories belong to people, not pieces of cloth. Our love for Fiji does not live inside the Union Jack stitched into the corner of our flag. It lives in us.</p>
<p>The truth is simple. Fiji has been an independent nation since 1970 and a republic since 1987. For almost four decades we have chosen our own governments, written our own laws and determined our own future.</p>
<p><strong>Someone else&#8217;s empire</strong><br />
Yet our national flag still carries the most recognisable symbol of the British Empire. I often ask myself a question that has never left me: If we truly believe we stand proudly as an independent republic, why does the first thing the world see on our flag belong to someone else’s empire?</p>
<p>For me, this question is deeply personal.</p>
<p>I am the descendant of <em>girmitiya</em>. My ancestors did not come to Fiji as tourists searching for opportunity. They came under the indenture system established by the British colonial administration after the abolition of slavery.</p>
<p>Between 1879 and 1916, more than 60,000 Indians were transported to Fiji under contracts that promised hope, but too often delivered exploitation, broken families, harsh labour and lives shaped by extraordinary sacrifice.</p>
<p>Many never saw India again. They built roads, cleared fields, harvested sugar cane and helped lay the foundations of the country we now call home. Their suffering was not an accident of history. It happened under the authority of the very empire represented by the Union Jack.</p>
<p>Every <a href="https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/two-dates-one-wound-what-girmit-day-means-fiji-s-future">Girmit Day</a>, May 14, Fiji rightly remembers those sacrifices. We honour resilience. We celebrate survival. We tell our children that our ancestors endured unimaginable hardship so future generations could stand taller than they ever could.</p>
<p>Yet we continue to fly a flag that still carries the emblem of the colonial power responsible for creating that very system. I have struggled to reconcile those two truths. Pride and pain cannot occupy the same symbol forever.</p>
<p><strong>History never felt distant</strong><br />
Growing up in Kashmir, Lautoka, history never felt distant. It lived in conversations with elders, in temple gatherings, in stories shared over cups of tea, in the Fiji Hindi that flowed so naturally through our home.</p>
<p>I did not fully understand the scale of <em>girmit</em> as a child, but I understood sacrifice. I saw grandparents who measured wealth not by money, but by education. I watched parents work tirelessly because they believed their children deserved opportunities they never had.</p>
<p>Looking back now, I realise those values were inherited from people who had every reason to give up, but refused to. When I see the Union Jack on our flag today, I do not think first of constitutional history or Commonwealth ties. I think of those ancestors. I think of what they endured. And I wonder why their descendants should still carry the symbol of the empire that once denied them dignity.</p>
<p>Some people argue that the Union Jack no longer represents colonialism. They say it now represents history, friendship or tradition. I understand that perspective.</p>
<p>History cannot and should not be erased. Britain’s influence on Fiji is undeniable. Our legal institutions, parliamentary traditions and many aspects of our public administration evolved through that relationship. The Commonwealth continues to play an important role in Fiji’s international engagement.</p>
<p>None of that changes because a flag changes. Britain remains part of our history whether or not its flag appears on ours.</p>
<p>That is precisely the point.</p>
<p><strong>Not about rejecting history</strong><br />
Changing the flag is not about rejecting history. It is about placing history where it belongs &#8212; in our museums, our classrooms, our books and our collective memory &#8212; not at the centre of our national identity. Mature nations are capable of acknowledging every chapter of their past without allowing one chapter to define them forever.</p>
<p>My own life has only strengthened that belief. I was born in Fiji. I migrated to Auckland in December 2011. Since then I have lived and taught in New Zealand, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and now Japan. Every country has reminded me of where I come from.</p>
<p>Whenever someone asks me where home is, my answer is still Fiji. Not because I have lived there continuously, but because identity is built from childhood. It is the taste of chicken chop suey from Don’s Restaurant after family outings. It is buying futaa barfi for 20 cents. It is listening to Navtarang’s Top 100 Countdown while polishing black Bata school shoes.</p>
<p>It is Children’s Park in Lautoka, Ram Samy Reddy Rd, laughter with cousins, temple bells, tropical rain and neighbours who somehow knew everyone else’s business. None of those memories have anything to do with an empire. They belong entirely to Fiji.</p>
<p>Our flag should too.</p>
<p>I also reject the false choice that often dominates this conversation. Supporting a new flag does not mean disrespecting those who served beneath the current one. Soldiers who defended peacekeeping missions, athletes who won Olympic gold, teachers who stood before classrooms, nurses who cared for patients and ordinary citizens who loved Fiji under this flag deserve nothing, but gratitude.</p>
<p>Their achievements are not diminished because a future generation chooses a different symbol. The courage belonged to them, not to the fabric they carried.</p>
<p><strong>Learn from the mistakes</strong><br />
If we do revisit this conversation, we must also learn from the mistakes of the last attempt. Too many people felt the process became about selecting attractive designs rather than discussing national identity.</p>
<p>A flag cannot simply be beautiful. It must be meaningful. It should emerge from genuine consultation with iTaukei communities, Indo-Fijians, Rotumans, Banabans, descendants of Pacific Islanders, Chinese-Fijians and every community that calls Fiji home.</p>
<p>It must reflect our ocean, our resilience, our cultures, our environment and our future &#8212; not because we want to erase difference, but because we want every child to recognise themselves within it.</p>
<p>I often think about the children I teach. One of the greatest privileges of being an educator is watching young people ask questions adults are often afraid to ask. They understand instinctively that symbols matter. School emblems matter. Family names matter.</p>
<p>National flags matter. They tell stories before anyone speaks a word. What story do we want Fiji’s flag to tell the next generation? That we are still defined by colonial inheritance? Or that we honour our history while confidently writing the next chapter ourselves?</p>
<p>Some will accuse people like me of reopening old wounds. I would argue the opposite. Healing begins when we acknowledge why certain symbols continue to hurt. As the descendant of indentured labourers, I cannot look at the Union Jack without remembering the empire that uprooted my ancestors from India and placed them into a system built on coercion and exploitation.</p>
<p>That history shaped my family. It shaped my language. It shaped my existence. I refuse to pretend that symbol is emotionally neutral simply because time has passed.</p>
<p><strong>Fiji bigger than powers</strong><br />
Fiji has always been bigger than the powers that once ruled it. Bigger than coups. Bigger than politics. Bigger than race. Bigger than the labels that have too often divided us. We are the children of chiefs and farmers, of girmitiya and sailors, of island communities stretching across hundreds of islands, of people who chose Fiji and people whose ancestors had no choice.</p>
<p>Somehow, through hardship and hope, we built one nation together.</p>
<p>Our flag should finally reflect that truth.</p>
<p>Changing it will not solve poverty. It will not lower food prices, improve schools overnight or fix every political disagreement. Symbols alone never transform nations. But symbols tell nations who they believe themselves to be. After nearly 40 years as a republic, Fiji has earned the right to carry a flag that speaks first and foremost of itself.</p>
<p>Not because we reject our past.</p>
<p>But because we are finally confident enough to stand on our own.</p>
<p><em>Ashneel Jaynesh Prasad is a Fiji-born New Zealand citizen working as a teacher in Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan. This article was first published by The Fiji Times and is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why US sanctions are deadlier for children than Tomahawk cruise missiles</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/09/why-us-sanctions-are-deadlier-for-children-than-tomahawk-cruise-missiles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 11:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba blockade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene Doyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Sanctions Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infant mortality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josephine Varghese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luis Morejón Rodríguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medea Benjamin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lancet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US sanctions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Eugene Doyle United States unilateral sanctions, the kind being imposed on Cuba today, are deadlier for children than war according to a major piece of research published in The Lancet, the world’s leading medical journal. Totally ignored by the mainstream media, the report has bombshell findings that should call into question the use ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Eugene Doyle</em></p>
<p>United States unilateral sanctions, the kind being imposed on Cuba today, are deadlier for children than war according to a major piece of research published in <em>The Lancet</em>, the world’s leading medical journal.</p>
<p>Totally ignored by the mainstream media, the report has bombshell findings that should call into question the use of sanctions to impose punishments on entire populations for the actions of their governments.</p>
<p>A staggering 500,000 civilians die annually due to US and EU unilateral sanctions that many Western countries help enforce.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2026/7/30/to-play-god-cubas-healthcare-system-collapses-under-us-pressure"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> &#8216;To play God&#8217;: How US pressure has shattered Cuba&#8217;s healthcare</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Sanctions">Other sanctions reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Sanctions are &#8216;more tremendous than war&#8217;<br />
</strong>The report by Professor Francisco Rodríguez, Silvio Rendón and Mark Weisbrot vividly underscores US President Woodrow Wilson’s comment that sanctions were “something more tremendous than war.”</p>
<p><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(25)00189-5/fulltext"><em>“Effects of international sanctions on age-specific mortality: a cross-national panel data analysis”</em></a> data-mined major studies covering the years 1971-2021. Its primary source was the Global Sanctions Database (GSDB), internationally the most comprehensive aggregator of global datasets on sanctions.</p>
<p>Analysing research covering the years 1971-2021 across 152 countries, the researchers found that unilateral sanctions (such as those imposed on Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Yemen and Iraq) were “associated with an annual toll of 564,258 deaths, similar to the global mortality burden associated with armed conflict.” Imagine that: every year, for decades, sanctions (primarily US and EU sanctions) have taken the lives of hundreds of thousands of civilians &#8212; and that rate has accelerated, not declined, because American use of sanctions has exploded in recent years.</p>
<p>According to the Global Sanctions Database (GSDB), 25 percent of all countries have been put under US, EU, or UN sanctions in the 2010–22 period! That’s a massive leap from 8 percent in the 1960s. For this short article I will focus on Cuba but the same lessons apply to whatever countries are targeted for unilateral sanctions.</p>
<p><strong>Saving the babies of Cuba<br />
</strong>Professor Francisco Rodriguez, an economist at Denver&#8217;s Josef Korbel School of International Studies is the lead author of the study. He says: “Our findings reveal that unilateral and economic sanctions, particularly those imposed by the USA, lead to substantial increases in mortality, disproportionately affecting children younger than 5 years.”</p>
<p>Some Americans are fighting every day to save the babies of Cuba. Others, like the President and the Secretary of State, are doing everything they can to kill Cuban babies and thousands of others of the most vulnerable citizens of the besieged Caribbean island.</p>
<p>This is not hyperbole; it is policy that is playing out on our watch.</p>
<p>Medea Benjamin, the great American activist from the CodePink peace organisation, recently visited Cuba to bring medicines and medical supplies to Cuba&#8217;s pediatric hospitals.</p>
<p>She is now under investigation for doing so &#8212; for breaking US unilateral sanctions.</p>
<p><em>“Basically, we want to help save babies, and that, according to Trump, is something that must be investigated. Because ‘How dare we want to help the Cuban people? How dare we love the Cuban people?’ If indeed the charge is that we love the Cuban people &#8212; ‘Guilty!’ I want my government to leave the Cuban people alone, not to be strangling them by keeping oil from the island, by sanctions that are so brutal. I want them to stop threatening to invade Cuba. I want them to listen to the global world opinion that every single year at the United Nations overwhelmingly says: lift the blockade.”</em></p>
<p><strong>Sanctions: the modern &#8216;Siege Engine&#8217;<br />
</strong>Why the silence from the mainstream media about the report’s findings? Why did they choose to ignore what in a sane and decent world would have been earth-shaking revelations?</p>
<p>Dr Josephine Varghese of the University of Canterbury suggests this is because the West puts great effort into burying inconvenient truths. She specialises in the intersections of colonialism, capitalism and structural violence and told me this week: “The United States has openly admitted that the purpose of the sanctions is to create conditions so bad that the people in Cuba will turn against their own government.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_131791" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131791" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-131791" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Dr-Josephine-Varghese-Sol-680wide.png" alt="Dr Josephine Varghese in Cuba 2026" width="680" height="434" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Dr-Josephine-Varghese-Sol-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Dr-Josephine-Varghese-Sol-680wide-300x191.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Dr-Josephine-Varghese-Sol-680wide-658x420.png 658w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131791" class="wp-caption-text">Dr Josephine Varghese in Cuba in 2026 . . . the West puts great effort into burying inconvenient truths. Image: www.solidarity.co.nz</figcaption></figure>
<p>Cuba’s entire electricity grid collapsed last week, driving millions of Cubans to the brink &#8212; just what the US wants.</p>
<p>“At the ground level, sanctions have a deadly impact,” Dr Varghese says. “Cuba had such impressive achievements in health, for example, in lowering infant mortality.</p>
<p>&#8220;The current sanctions and punishments are targeting this. We are seeing nurses and doctors having to manually operate ventilators and incubators for premature babies.”</p>
<p>Luis Ernesto Morejón Rodríguez, Cuba’s ambassador to Wellington, New Zealand, reinforced this message when he told me of the human impact of the blockade:</p>
<p>“I think about children fighting cancer whose chances of survival have been devastated because the chemotherapy drugs and other essential medicines they need are simply not available.</p>
<p>&#8220;Years ago, around 65 percent of these children could expect to survive. Today, because treatments are interrupted or cannot be provided at all, that figure has been tragically reversed: as many as 85 percent may not survive.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think about the parents waiting for a phone call that never comes because more than 100,000 Cubans &#8212; including over 12,000 children &#8212; are still waiting for surgery.</p>
<figure id="attachment_124262" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-124262" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-124262" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Eugene-Doyle-Cuban-envoy-Sol-680wide-.png" alt="Solidarity author Eugene Doyle with Cuban Ambassador Luis Ernesto Morejón Rodríguez" width="680" height="445" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Eugene-Doyle-Cuban-envoy-Sol-680wide-.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Eugene-Doyle-Cuban-envoy-Sol-680wide--300x196.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Eugene-Doyle-Cuban-envoy-Sol-680wide--642x420.png 642w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-124262" class="wp-caption-text">Solidarity author Eugene Doyle with Cuban Ambassador Luis Ernesto Morejón Rodríguez . . . &#8220;Political differences should never be settled at the expense of ordinary people, and certainly never at the expense of children.” Image: www.solidarity.co.nz</figcaption></figure>
<p>“Cuba once had one of the lowest infant mortality rates in the Americas. Today that rate has more than doubled, rising from around four to more than nine deaths per thousand live births.</p>
<p>&#8220;These are not just numbers. They are children who should still be alive, families carrying unbearable pain, and healthcare professionals forced to make impossible choices every day.</p>
<p>&#8220;Political differences should never be settled at the expense of ordinary people, and certainly never at the expense of children.”</p>
<p>Now that we know that sanctions have effects on the health and mortality of civilian populations similar in magnitude to those of armed conflict, what should we do about it? Will we continue to shrug and look the other way out of fear of the US or indifference to human suffering?</p>
<p>Will we have the courage to at last recognise the inconvenient truth that the US and the EU have killed civilians on a scale, albeit at a slower pace, greater than the German government of the 1940s?</p>
<p>Isn’t it time to find the courage to oppose this? The reform of the entire sanctions framework must be a global priority. Unilateral secondary sanctions (forcing other countries to implement sanctions) is already illegal under international law.</p>
<p>Such is the power of the US and the EU &#8212; controlling as they do a large portion of the levers of international trade and finance &#8212; that most countries bow down and comply. For the sake of children suffering now and millions more not yet born, that must end and a new era which restrains and reforms the use of sanctions must be ushered in.</p>
<p>As the great Brazilian educator Paulo Freire said: “Washing one&#8217;s hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.”</p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.solidarity.co.nz/about">Eugene Doyle</a> is a writer based in Wellington, New Zealand. He has written extensively on the Middle East, as well as peace and security issues in the Asia Pacific region. He contributes to Asia Pacific Report and hosts <a href="https://www.solidarity.co.nz/">solidarity.co.nz</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ABC’s intellectual and moral decline comes at the worst possible time</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/09/the-abcs-intellectual-and-moral-decline-comes-at-the-worst-possible-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 08:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Shot]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Joel Jenkins Of late, Australia&#8217;s public broadcaster ABC has been altering the way it sees the world around it. Bound by a national charter, but modified from within after years of ideological, technical, and operational transfer, the organisation is failing in its duty to inform Australians. This is occurring at a time of ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Joel Jenkins</em></p>
<p>Of late, Australia&#8217;s public broadcaster ABC has been altering the way it sees the world around it. Bound by a national charter, but modified from within after years of ideological, technical, and operational transfer, the organisation is failing in its duty to inform Australians.</p>
<p>This is occurring at a time of great uncertainty, when it is needed to function healthily, truthfully, the most.</p>
<p>The ABC’s subjective and selective journalism jolts through a country in flux, emblematic of a broader act of censorship that goes on to form the body of a foreign influenced effort to moderate the country’s resting state to entertain the previously unthinkable.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Media+credibility"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other media credibility reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>In a world at boiling point, in a nation being led down the garden path by powerful small interests working in concert to shape public perception and limit the range of acceptable debate, the decline of the ABC has been <a href="https://abcfriends.au/abc_no_longer_most_trusted_for_news">felt by many Australians</a>.</p>
<p>With pandemics, bushfires, floods, wars and a live streamed genocide still unravelling unabated, the elite power structures that have controlled our country’s destiny have revealed themselves to be nothing short of diabolical &#8212; propped up by a corporate media apparatus that works directly in lockstep with the interests of the billionaires and powermongers of Australia’s shallow rooted elite.</p>
<p>In this time of power and consolidation, the ABC has been commandeered and realigned through a concerted effort carried out by a network of former commercial media executives and political appointees who have steadily replaced the organisation’s independent traditions with a more compliant, establishment-friendly outlook.</p>
<p>Ten years under the Coalition, squeezed from above, the ABC has been augmented from root to branch in a process of attrition. A decade of siloing and <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/john-lyons/14017482">compartmentalising the old guard</a>, replacing board members with former corporate media hatchetmen, and replacing outgoing ABC stalwarts and custodians with new-wave stenographers who kicked off their trade weaving in the dark arts of Murdoch, has left the ABC almost unrecognisable.</p>
<p><strong>Sinophobic news specials</strong><br />
Barrie Cassidy got <a href="https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/david-speers-to-replace-barrie-cassidy-on-abc-insiders-20190524-p51qu5">replaced by</a> David Speers, ABC people get replaced by non-ABC people &#8212; and sooner rather than later we have <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/season-five-episodes/13753296">Sinophobic news specials</a> with moody music, too much airtime wasted on <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-18/dave-hughes-the-assembly/106652534">Hughsey</a>, <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/worldtoday/-terminated-kyle-sandilands-declares-i-m-not-done-/106468544">Sandilands</a> and <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-26/karl-stefanovic-today-outsider-politics/106844360">Stefanovic</a>, and a repellent tabloid MSG-like shimmer can be seen on the once mighty public broadcaster.</p>
<p>The ABC once had a star factory within the organisation, with an organic workplace ethos, that produced inhouse some of the better journalists in the world. People like Mark Colvin, Caroline Jones and Kerry O’Brien defined the standard at the ABC by living it and bleeding it into the fabric of the organisation.</p>
<p>Now, as the old guard are washed out, they are replaced by former Murdoch heavies and corporate news executives.</p>
<p>These days, David Speers (News Corp), Patricia Karvelas (News Corp) and Clare Armstrong (News Corp), partner with CEO Kim Williams (News Corp, Foxtel) and a constellation of former corporate suits. A new ethos seeps into the organisation.</p>
<figure id="attachment_131777" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131777" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-131777" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Nightly-TShot-680tall.png" alt="The Nightly " width="680" height="852" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Nightly-TShot-680tall.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Nightly-TShot-680tall-239x300.png 239w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Nightly-TShot-680tall-335x420.png 335w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131777" class="wp-caption-text">The Nightly . . . The ABC &#8220;reduced the [Pine Gap indigenous] story to an ambiguous, if not futile, demonstration on an empty red desert highway&#8221;. Image: The Shot Screenshot APR</figcaption></figure>
<p>People like former Nine CEO Hugh Marks (current ABC managing director), see fit to continue the cultural transfer, employing former News Corp finance reporter Alex Turner-Cohen, and hiring London-based writer-at-large for <em>The Nightly</em> Latika Bourke.</p>
<p>Bourke is one of the most hawkish journalists in the country, enjoying her plum job co-presenting the ABC’s <em>Global Roaming</em> programme on Radio National while continuing to write articles for Kerry Stokes that <a href="https://www.facebook.com/LatikaMbourkeJournalist/photos/hi-followers-my-latest-report-for-the-nightly-natos-director-of-nuclear-policy-j/1340468780776807/">look like they’re proofread by the military</a> industrial complex.</p>
<p><em>The Shot’s</em> editor Dave Milner recently <a href="https://theshot.net.au/uncategorized/the-fight-to-end-the-us-military-occupation-of-australia-and-the-entire-world/">covered a Pine Gap landback</a> demonstration in the Northern Territory, where a powerful gathering of local Arrernte Indigenous families laid down four demands for land back, closure of the base, reparations, and compensation for the families in Gaza impacted by the base’s opaque operations.</p>
<p>The ABC told what resembled a story, waltzing around the glaring demands reflecting a national groundswell, and reducing the story to an ambiguous, if not futile, demonstration on an empty red desert highway.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WxE9BLx4Ujk?si=4YPiqeJBiXZ2Kl-A" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Proof the ABC erased Gaza from its Pine Gap coverage         Video: The Sunday Shot</em></p>
<p><strong>Israeli govt talking points</strong><br />
On the ABC, this is the way things are done now. And it looks like Patricia Karvelas <a href="https://johnmenadue.com/post/2025/05/false-balance-persists-in-abc-palestine-coverage/">positing Israeli government talking points</a> almost three years into a UN-declared genocide in the name of balance, or a vibe coded report on the virtues of the Ukraine war with a <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/how-war-weakened-strongman-putin/101629024">comic book analysis</a> from Matt Bevan, or it’s a rude and <a href="https://theshot.net.au/uncategorized/australian-media-hacks-always-get-dismantled-by-facts/">misguided gotcha themed interview</a> from Sara Ferguson.</p>
<p>And just as seen outside Pine Gap, the national broadcaster is gaslighting the shit out of us on a raft of crucial issues. So where is the public interest at the ABC?</p>
<p>Is it in the public interest to frame Iran as some <a href="https://theshot.net.au/uncategorized/australian-media-hacks-always-get-dismantled-by-facts/">form of equal aggressor</a> in the Netanyahu-Trump led conflict in West Asia? Is the community better off <a href="https://www.boganintel.com/p/pulp-fiction-the-fantastical-nature?r=i2xwd&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web">entertaining future wars with China</a> with ideologically conflicted journalists who have no idea? Is it objective to run positive narratives on the <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-14/nuclear-submarine-aukus-how-cost-impact-military-capability/102089496">inevitability of AUKUS</a>, or speak for the Ukrainian and Russian people on their <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-02/vladimir-putin-supporters-start-to-question-ukraine-war/106979976">appetite for war</a>, or omit the clear demands of the Arrernte people for the immediate closure of Pine Gap?</p>
<p>Is it in the public interest to move heaven and earth to engineer a curated and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHMBBMkG8U">macabre middle ground</a> on an open-cut UN declared genocide, in the name of &#8220;balance&#8221;?</p>
<p>The new ABC hosts private weapons industry investor and former-general Mick Ryan <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/drones/105424234">flogging off his drones</a> in one hand while gesticulating towards the need for more endless drone wars with the other. It gives <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-31/us-iran-war-costs-driven-by-expensive-missile-interceptors/106948672">regular airtime to daggy-dad militarist</a> Dr Malcolm Davis spinning his love for movies like Red Dawn into real life fantasies that involve unrealistic military scenarios that have terrible human consequences.</p>
<p>And it provides a runway to Epstein friend and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHMBBMkG8U">former Israeli PM Ehud Barak</a> to put a spin on his country’s genocide as the Epstein files loom with his name all over them.</p>
<p>Encroaching authoritarianism, sovereign transfer, foreign interference; these are all things good journalists should be working towards unpacking. But not in Australia, where a convergence between the media, business and political classes has morphed our press into subjective stenographers rather than objective truth tellers.</p>
<p><strong>Joining the national decline</strong><br />
It’s devastating to see the national broadcaster, stacked with its corporate media heavies, joining in the national decline, rather than tirelessly working to uncover it and prevent it.</p>
<p>At a time of crisis and uncertainty, with clear power differentials impacting the sovereign independent trajectory of the country, the absence of quality ABC analysis, with conscious critical thinking applied, has hyperaccelerated the demise of the reasonable in the country — giving up sacred ground in the Australian discourse and ceding it to the foreign influenced dark forces that conjure a new image of what this country should look like.</p>
<p>The Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983 states within it that it is the responsibility of the ABC to provide innovative and comprehensive broadcasting services of a high standard within Australia.</p>
<p>Within the ABC Code of Practice, accuracy, impartiality, and fair and honest dealing are listed as key principles. But in 2026, with the country in the state that it is, Australians feel that they are missing an independent national broadcaster to balance the droning hum of misinformation and political dishonesty.</p>
<p>Bringing back the old theme song and changing the blue tint and the classic ABC font won’t cut it. Latika Bourke isn’t George Negus. David Speers’ Sky News prestige doesn’t cut through to the high brow hard politics junkies in Australians who mourn for the lost tones of Barrie Cassidy and Kerry O’Brien and gravitate like husks in the places their voices used to be.</p>
<p>This is why the ABC is failing. It’s been run into the ground by the very people who longed for its demise, the same people who pipe a new paradigm on reluctant ABC consumers and loyal ABC staff that wonder what is going on, and stick around out of habit hoping the revisionists will go away one day.</p>
<p>By accepting orthodoxies from Washington, Tel Aviv, and people linked to the arms trade, we now have the ABC promoting war in Europe, entertaining tensions with China, and accepting the morbid orthodoxies that see military, economic and diplomatic support for Israel in its horrific genocidal sojourns throughout West Asia.</p>
<p><strong>Journalists sacked, staff cautioned</strong><br />
Journalists that <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4exrwj8pjo">highlight that fact are sacked</a>, staff that seek to <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/not-our-place-to-use-terms-like-genocide-and-apartheid-says-abc-boss-20231117-p5ekrx.html">expand those details</a> are <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/abc-federal-politics-reporter-resigns-over-gaza-coverage-20240112-p5ewrm.html">cautioned, exhausted into leaving</a>, or guided into paddocks until they retire and their role can be handed to another wolf in sheep’s clothing from the corporate kennel.</p>
<p>In the process of remodelling the national broadcaster, those responsible have flogged the essence of the ABC. They now flog partial stories Australians need to hear in full, and flog the narratives of the elite and the dangerous at the expense of the truth. Whether it is a gotcha interview on <em>7.30</em>, the omission of vital public interest information, or a corporate decree that silences staff inside the building itself, the ABC has fallen dramatically and may never get up again.</p>
<p>The abdication of the ABC away from the people and into the arms of the narratives of power is a tragedy for Australia during such consequential times.</p>
<p>For decades the ABC acted as a guardrail, ignored the haters, and fearlessly drove the standard of journalism in Australia. Now, it contributes to the mess, sitting in the pig-sty with the commercial media, so much so it’s hard to tell which is which, such is the stench.</p>
<p><em>Republished by <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/category/pacific-media-watch/">Pacific Media Watch</a> from <a href="https://theshot.net.au/">The Shot</a> under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia&#8217;s Royal Commission into antisemitism a &#8216;$131 million whinge&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/07/australias-royal-commission-into-antisemitism-a-131-million-whinge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 11:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aboriginal Deaths in Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antisemitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking Royal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bondi Royal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions of antisemitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political extremism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radicalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social cohesion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terms of reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“Australians are not being investigated for hating Jews. They are being investigated for objecting to a genocide.” Michael West Media&#8217;s coverage of the Royal Commission into Antisemitism. COMMENTARY: By Andrew Brown Apparently antisemitism simply fell from the sky. Fully formed. Immaculately conceived. Entirely unrelated to anything happening in Gaza. That is the finding Australia has ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Australians are not being investigated for hating Jews. They are being investigated for objecting to a genocide.” <strong>Michael West Media&#8217;s</strong> coverage of the Royal Commission into Antisemitism.</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Andrew Brown</em></p>
<p>Apparently antisemitism simply fell from the sky. Fully formed. Immaculately conceived.</p>
<p>Entirely unrelated to anything happening in Gaza.</p>
<p>That is the finding Australia has pre-purchased for $131.1 million, confirmed at Senate Estimates in February, with $91 million alone for staffing, property, lawyers and security.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Bondi+Royal+Commission"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Bondi Royal Commission reports</a></li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>Every single dollar buys theatre.</p></blockquote>
<p>Measure the obscenity. The banking royal commission, which gutted an entire industry’s misconduct, cost $75 million. Aboriginal Deaths in Custody cost $50.2 million.</p>
<p>This inquiry outspends both combined. Meanwhile there is no royal commission into the domestic violence killing a woman most weeks, none into Islamophobia, now soaring.</p>
<p>Australia found $131 million for the one inquiry designed never to ask an obvious question.</p>
<p>Blame where it belongs. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wrote the answer into the question.</p>
<p>His Letters Patent instruct the Commission to find the drivers of antisemitism in extremism and radicalisation, the war deleted from the terms of reference before Commissioner Virginia Bell was even sworn in.</p>
<p>The Albanese government wrote the verdict into the terms of reference, then spent more than the banking royal commission to have a judge read it back. Here is what the money is buying.</p>
<p><strong>Commissioning an alibi<br />
</strong>Albanese promised the inquiry would deliver, in his own words, the right outcome. A Prime Minister announcing the right outcome in advance is commissioning an alibi.</p>
<p>This is the government that will gesture at recognising Palestine while refusing to utter the word genocide, that ships F35 components into the supply chain of the slaughter, that sanctions two Israeli ministers and calls it courage.</p>
<p>It needed a grand national explanation for collapsing social cohesion that never once mentions its own complicity.</p>
<blockquote><p>For $131 million, it has bought one.</p></blockquote>
<p>The process delivered. In the first three days of hearings, 23 of 36 witnesses characterised criticism of Israel, opposition to Zionism or Palestine advocacy as antisemitic.</p>
<p>Jewish organisations opposed to Zionism were refused leave to appear. Palestinian voices were excluded for lacking a direct and substantial interest.</p>
<p>The accused were barred from the courtroom so the prosecution could run unopposed at public expense.</p>
<p><strong>The grievance parade<br />
</strong>And the substance? A grievance parade.</p>
<p>The ABC and SBS hauled in to answer for Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Segal’s strong perception, her phrase, that their Gaza coverage lacks balance, then interrogated for declining the contested IHRA definition Bell waved through as uncontroversial.</p>
<p>Keffiyehs, flags, watermelon art, chants of Free Palestine, student encampments and fundraisers for maimed children tendered as exhibits of hate. Protest. Tents. Journalism.</p>
<p>Every place an ordinary Australian expressed solidarity with a people being exterminated, recast at public expense as a crime scene. Australians are not being investigated for hating Jews.</p>
<blockquote><p>They are being investigated for objecting to a genocide.</p></blockquote>
<p>The complainants were welcomed like royalty. Alex Ryvchin of the ECAJ, who called the anti-Israel movement indistinguishable from neo-Nazism, testified at length while his silk objected to opposing counsel merely uttering the word genocide, a finding the International Court of Justice considered plausible back in January 2024.</p>
<p>Robert Gregory of the self-appointed Australian Jewish Association, which the ECAJ itself calls unrepresentative, told the Commission the government egged on antisemitism, fresh from blaming Bondi on visas for Palestinians fleeing the bombs.</p>
<p><strong>Sky’s the limit<br />
</strong>Sky News completes the circuit, wheeling Gregory out to demonise protesters, then feeding its own segments back into the panic as evidence.</p>
<p>The outcomes are as predetermined as the terms.</p>
<p>Come December 14, expect IHRA stamped across the public service and pushed onto civil society, work Segal has begun.</p>
<p>Expect ABC oversight its own ombudsman rejected. Expect protest reframed as policing, and regulators monitoring speech the way AHPRA already does, having admitted under oath it watches nurses and doctors for criticism of Israel after Segal’s pressure.</p>
<blockquote><p>Expect everything blamed but the war.</p></blockquote>
<p>And expect antisemitism not to fall, because you cannot cure what you refuse to diagnose. Every recommendation will manufacture the resentment it claims to fight, and Labor will call the wreckage cohesion.</p>
<p>For almost three years the world has watched a genocide live-streamed by a state claiming to act in the name of the Jewish people, while its Australian cheer squad defended, excused or denied every atrocity.</p>
<blockquote><p>Now they ask why anger grows.</p></blockquote>
<p>None of this excuses antisemitism. Not one word of it. The Bondi gunmen murdered Jews for being Jews, and the law should fall hard on every bigot who follows them.</p>
<p>Fifteen dead Australians deserved a fearless inquiry. They got a pantomime, their graves deployed as a shield for a foreign state and the government that armed it.</p>
<p>The elephant is blocking the doorway and eating $131 million of paperwork, yet everyone keeps peering around it, declaring there is nothing to see.</p>
<p>This Commission will not defeat antisemitism. It will deliver the most expensive whinge in Australian history, commissioned by a government purchasing its own absolution with public money.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/andrew-brown/"> Andrew Brown</a> is a Sydney businessman in the health products sector, former Deputy Mayor of Mosman and a Palestine peace activist.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>El-Sayed&#8217;s Michigan primary win against tyranny a good omen for a fairer US future</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/07/el-sayeds-michigan-primary-win-against-tyranny-a-good-omen-for-a-fairer-us-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 07:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abdul El-Sayed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaire class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neo-fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US corporations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Robert Reich With the victory of progressive Dr Abdul El-Sayed over Rep. Haley Stevens in Michigan’s Democratic primary this week, prepare yourself to hear enormous quantities of bullsh*t in the United States about the Democratic Party now being “taken over” by “Democratic Socialists”. Or as the reliably establishment New York Times described what’s ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Robert Reich</em></p>
<p>With the victory of progressive Dr Abdul El-Sayed over Rep. Haley Stevens in Michigan’s Democratic primary this week, prepare yourself to hear enormous quantities of bullsh*t in the United States about the Democratic Party now being “taken over” by “Democratic Socialists”.</p>
<p>Or as the reliably establishment <em>New York Times</em> described what’s at stake, “can an insurgent candidate, with unabashedly left-wing positions, win in a moderate state?”</p>
<p>Oh, p-l-e-a-s-e.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/6/how-abdul-el-sayeds-extraordinary-win-stunned-pro-israel-establishment"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> How Abdul El-Sayed’s ‘extraordinary’ win stunned pro-Israel establishment</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Michigan Democrats didn’t choose Dr El-Sayed because he’s “unabashedly left wing” or a Democratic Socialist (in fact, he’s not).</p>
<p>They chose him because he’s a fighter &#8212; at a time when America needs fighters willing to stand up to the worst tyrant who has ever occupied the Oval Office.</p>
<p>Corporate Democrats&#8211; such as Haley Stevens, along with Rahm Emanuel, Chuck Schumer, and Hakeem Jeffries &#8212; aren’t up to the task because they won’t bite the corporate hands that feed them campaign money.</p>
<p>They won’t criticise the billionaire class. They refuse to see how big money has corrupted America.</p>
<p><strong>Billionaires backing neo-fascism</strong><br />
Yet it’s big corporations and the billionaire class that are supporting Trump’s neo-fascism.</p>
<p>They’ve sucked up to Trump for corporate welfare, giant tax cuts, tariff exemptions, antitrust acquiescence, and war contracts. They’ve given Trump hundreds of millions for his inauguration, his ballroom, his 250th birthday, his superPAC.</p>
<p>Jamie Dimon and Wall Street; Elon Musk and his billionaire bros; Brad Carp and his corporate lawyers; Peter Thiel, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and the Ellisons &#8212; all have sold their integrity for huge profits.</p>
<p>They’ve created media empires that won’t criticise Trump, financial empires that feed Trump’s crypto, energy empires that feed off Trump’s war, and legal empires that allow Trump to ride roughshod over the rule of law.</p>
<p>Which is why America desperately needs people in Congress who will fight against Trump and his sycophants.</p>
<p>The Democratic Party isn’t being taken over by Democratic Socialists. There’s no civil war between progressives and moderates. We aren’t witnessing an ideological battle between the “left” and the “center”.</p>
<p>We’re seeing America wake up to the tyranny that’s engulfed us, and to a crisis of affordability that’s causing most Americans to struggle financially while fueling the biggest stock market rally in history.</p>
<p><strong>Tyranny is handmaiden of money</strong><br />
When corporate America and Wall Street are unleashed &#8212; when the President of the United States has made an implicit deal with the moneyed interests to back him and his authoritarian regime in exchange for tax cuts, deregulation, monopolisation, and pay-to-play corruption &#8212; of course prices soar and wages stagnate.</p>
<p>Tyranny is the handmaiden of the moneyed interests.</p>
<p>The Democratic Party’s mega-donor class may be horrified by the rising tide of progressive populism overtaking more than a few primaries this cycle. It spent tens of million of dollars on Stevens &#8212; making the Michigan primary one of the most expensive in American history.</p>
<p>Too bad. It’s time that the Democratic Party’s mega-donor class recognises that its real choice is between democracy and tyranny, between an economy that works for all or one that works for a small sliver at the top.</p>
<p>If the mega-donor class chooses the latter, it may be acting in its narrow self-interest, but it will also be acting against the future of this nation.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://robertreich.substack.com">Robert Reich</a> is a US professor, former Secretary of Labour, co-founder of Inequality Media and writes at <a href="https://robertreich.substack.com">robertreich.substack.com</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self defence action by Iran &#8216;first truly consequential action&#8217; by state, says human rights lawyer</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/07/self-defence-action-by-iran-first-truly-consequential-action-by-state-says-human-rights-lawyer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axis of Resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campus protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Mokhiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimes against humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gazan resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livestreamed genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Electronic Intifada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War crimes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Electronic Intifada Israel and Iran are unique for starkly different reasons &#8212; Israel has less of a right to exist than any other country, while Iran is the only country that has stood up against the assault on international law by the US, Israel and their allies. That is according to Craig Mokhiber’s comments ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Electronic Intifada</em></p>
<p>Israel and Iran are unique for starkly different reasons &#8212; Israel has less of a right to exist than any other country, while Iran is the only country that has stood up against the assault on international law by the US, Israel and their allies.</p>
<p>That is according to Craig Mokhiber’s comments on <a href="https://youtu.be/FU-8w32rTgU?si=XscVD5nPnt7LPYQD"><em>The Electronic Intifada</em> Livestream</a>.</p>
<p>Mokhiber is an international human rights lawyer with more than three decades of experience. He served as director of the New York office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights until he resigned in October 2023 over the world body’s <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Gaza">failure to act against Israel’s genocide</a> in Gaza.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://youtu.be/FU-8w32rTgU?si=XscVD5nPnt7LPYQD"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Why Israel has no right to exist, with Craig Mokhiber</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">Other War on Iran reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>“This action of self-defence taken by Iran is the first truly consequential action by a member state,” Mokhiber said of Iran’s response to the <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">US and Israeli aggression</a> it has been facing.</p>
<p>Mokhiber also pointed to resistance by “students on their college campuses, by flotillas, by people’s tribunals, by demonstrations, by the resistance in Palestine, the resistance in Lebanon, by Ansarullah in Yemen”.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;A formidable state&#8217;</strong><br />
“But this is a state,” he said of Iran. “This is a formidable state with real military, diplomatic and political capacities that has stood up and said: ‘No more.’”</p>
<p>By contrast, Mokhiber said, every other country had either been directly complicit or looked away while the US, Israel and their allies committed serial aggression, livestreamed genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.</p>
<p>Contributing editor Jon Elmer reports on several days’ worth of Iranian attacks on US military assets in the region during the previous week, which caused extensive damage.</p>
<p><em>Republished from The Electronic Intifada with permission.</em></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FU-8w32rTgU?si=d2koT00tU5pBZf83" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Why Israel has no right to exist.         Video: The Electronic Intifada</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaza genocide: Mourning the 112 victims of two families of Israeli attacks &#8211; why the world silence?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/06/gaza-genocide-mourning-the-112-victims-of-two-families-of-israeli-attacks-why-the-world-silence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 02:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obituary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza ceasefire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gazan families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass expulsion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass funeral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sabra district]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Hamza Gwarzo Many of you have seen on social media globally what happened in Gaza this week. Why has the world remained silent? Why have the mainstream media remained silent? We, the people on social media, are the ones posting about it across different platforms. READ MORE: Gaza holds mass funeral for 112 people ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Hamza Gwarzo</em></p>
<p>Many of you have seen on social media globally what happened in Gaza this week.</p>
<p>Why has the world remained silent? Why have the mainstream media remained silent?</p>
<p>We, the people on social media, are the ones posting about it across different platforms.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/4/gaza-holds-mass-funeral-for-112-people-killed-in-israels-2023-sabra-attack"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Gaza holds mass funeral for 112 people killed in Israel’s 2023 Sabra attack</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide">Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Thousands of people gathered in Gaza City for the mass funeral of 112 people killed in the Sabra massacre by Israel in 2023 while the world watched in silence.</p>
<p>The dead were members of two families &#8212; Al-Hasayneh and Abu Sharia &#8212; whose remains were pulled from the rubble of homes destroyed earlier by Israeli airstrikes.</p>
<p>The funeral came during one of the deadliest stretches of Israeli bombardment in recent days, proof that the Gaza genocide‌ has not ended despite ceasefire and deal announcements.</p>
<p>Israel’s plan has not changed since 1948 &#8212; the mass expulsion of Palestinians and the complete ethnic cleansing of Palestine.</p>
<p><strong>Recovered bodies</strong><br />
Rescue teams recently recovered the bodies of the two families from the site of the Israeli attack in the Sabra neighbourhood on 22 November 2023.</p>
<p>The attack killed 308 members of the two families, including 40 children, 30 women and seven people with disabilities.</p>
<p>The bodies were wrapped in white shrouds. Mourners wept in grief and sorrow while the world looked on without taking action.</p>
<p>So I ask: does US President Donald Trump know about this? Has he been informed?</p>
<p>If he does know, and still doesn&#8217;t care, then what is the difference between this and the actions he has accused other countries of committing?</p>
<p>The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for some Israeli leaders, yet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is still traveling to different countries, including the US, and continues to be seen alongside world leaders.</p>
<p>There have been no strong sanctions, and the international pressure has not been as great as many expected.</p>
<p><strong>Heartbreaking world</strong><br />
I cannot describe the kind of world we are living in.</p>
<p>The world is silent. The media are silent. World leaders are silent.</p>
<p>Does this mean the world is unable to do anything to stop leaders accused of committing atrocities?</p>
<p>Where is the international community when it is needed most?</p>
<p>What is the purpose of international law if it is applied only against the weak?</p>
<p>It is truly heartbreaking.</p>
<p><em>A citizen journalist&#8217;s response to the Gaza mass funeral republished from <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/2140549742935302">Presstv.ir</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caitlin Johnstone: All mainstream Western institutions view Palestinian lives as worthless</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/05/caitlin-johnstone-all-mainstream-western-institutions-view-palestinian-lives-as-worthless/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC reporter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal settlers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied West Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian lives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political extremism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yehuda Shimon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist persecution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone The BBC recently interviewed an Israeli settler who said that all the Palestinians in four surrounding villages should be exterminated to avenge an Israeli who was killed while terrorising a Palestinian village last month, adding that just a single Jewish life is worth 10 million Palestinian lives. “I think now after ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>The BBC recently <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g4djgdyk2o" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interviewed an Israeli settler</a> who said that all the Palestinians in four surrounding villages should be exterminated to avenge an Israeli who <a href="https://www.972mag.com/tel-palestinian-israeli-settler-unarmed-video-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">was killed while terrorising</a> a Palestinian village last month, adding that just a single Jewish life is worth 10 million Palestinian lives.</p>
<p>“I think now after they kill one Israeli people, we need to kill all the people in Tal and Sarra, even Jit and Farata,” lawyer Yehuda Shimon told the BBC.</p>
<p>“It sounds like you’re saying one Jewish life is worth hundreds or thousands of Palestinian lives,” replied the BBC’s Lucy Williamson in the interview.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys_CBktM280" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>LISTEN:</strong> A reading by Tim Foley</a></li>
</ul>
<p>“Million,” Shimon corrected her. “One Jewish life, it’s 10 million, okay?”</p>
<p>“That just sounds racist,” Williamson responded, to which Shimon replied, “Yes, I know, I know. But this is the truth.”</p>
<p>The interaction has been going viral on social media as people react to the blatant display of the extremist ideology held by the settlers who are working to gradually squeeze Palestinians off their land in the West Bank.</p>
<p>And while it is true that Shimon’s comments are extremely evil and racist, that’s not what I personally found interesting about the interview. What I found interesting was Williamson’s response.</p>
<p>I mean, it is a bit rich watching a BBC reporter act shocked and offended by somebody saying they think Jewish lives are worth more than Palestinian lives. After all, the premise that Jewish lives are worth more than Palestinian lives has coloured every aspect of Western news media reporting on Israel and Palestine for generations.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="Inside an Israeli settlement in the West Bank. #BBCNews" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ORkyAS6R_7s" width="650" height="1156" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>That’s why the Western press expressed disproportionately more shock and horror at October 7 than the far more egregious Israeli abuses which led up to it and the far more egregious Israeli abuses which followed.</p>
<p>It’s why you saw howling outrage at the Bondi shooting in Sydney last year when the same number of Palestinians getting killed on any given day in Gaza <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/australians-being-massacred-shouldnt" target="_blank" rel="noopener">never even makes a blip in the news</a>.</p>
<p>On 26 March 2025, 15 Palestinians were <a href="https://archive.is/jbRZ7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">killed by the IDF during a ceasefire</a> in Gaza. On the December 14 that same year, 15 people were <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Bondi_Beach_shooting" target="_blank" rel="noopener">killed at Bondi Beach in Sydney</a> in a mass shooting by ISIS members directed at Jewish Australians.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ys_CBktM280?si=nXwJnPnxqPtu-Ha8" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>All mainstream Western institutions view Palestinian lives as worthless   Video: Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>Two instances of mass murder. Same exact number of victims. But you only heard about one of them.</p>
<p>Why did you only hear about one of them? Because only one of them made the news.</p>
<p>The mainstream press spent weeks urgently reporting on the Bondi shooting, frenetically working to falsely associate an ISIS terrorist attack with pro-Palestine demonstrations by <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/israel-propagandists-are-uniformly" target="_blank" rel="noopener">uniformly repeating the line “This is what globalise the intifada looks like”</a> in news outlets throughout the Western world.</p>
<p>Report after report after report was published about how Jews are being attacked, how Jews are feeling unsafe, and what new laws and free speech restrictions must be rolled out in order to stomp out pro-Palestine sentiment to protect the Jews.</p>
<p>Nothing remotely similar happened on the 26 March 2025. As far as the Western press were concerned, 15 Palestinians getting killed in Gaza was just another Wednesday.</p>
<p>This is because all mainstream Western media outlets hold the same racist opinions about Palestinians as those that were voiced by Yehuda Shimon.</p>
<p>So do all mainstream Western political parties. So do all other mainstream Western institutions. So do all supporters of the state of Israel. They all believe Jewish lives are worth more than Palestinian lives, as evidenced by the policies they support and the news stories they pay attention to.</p>
<p>The BBC has a well-documented history of <a href="https://www.declassifieduk.org/strong-pro-israel-bias-among-bbc-bosses-new-data-indicates/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">extensive pro-Israel bias</a>, with <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/bbc-civil-war-gaza-israel-biased-coverage" target="_blank" rel="noopener">its own reporters complaining</a> that they’ve been <a href="https://institute.aljazeera.net/en/ajr/article/3250" target="_blank" rel="noopener">performing PR for the Israeli government</a> and its own editor <a href="https://novaramedia.com/2026/03/12/high-court-rules-in-favour-of-owen-jones-in-bbc-gaza-libel-case/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">losing a libel lawsuit</a> against a journalist who exposed his pro-Israel slant.</p>
<p>They spent years running cover for an active genocide with “Hamas-run health ministry says” headlines and passive-language verbal gymnastics to protect Israeli information interests, so you know that when Lucy Williamson objects “That sounds racist!” to an Israeli settler claiming Jewish lives are worth far more than Palestinian lives, she’s not actually upset at his belief system.</p>
<p>She just knows you’re not supposed to say such things out loud.</p>
<p><a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/"><em>Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em> is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include <a href="https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-un-torture-report-on-assange-is-an-indictment-of-our-entire-society-bc7b0a7130a6">The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society</a>. She publishes a website and <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/">Caitlin’s Newsletter</a>. This article is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;I am now legally censored from even talking about being censored&#8217; &#8211; Martyn &#8216;Bomber&#8217; Bradbury</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/04/i-am-now-legally-censored-from-even-talking-about-being-censored-martyn-bomber-bradbury/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 09:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abuse of process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Insider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: By Martyn &#8220;Bomber&#8221; Bradbury, editor and publisher of The Daily Blog Media Insider: Complainant wants apology and blog posts permanently removed; blogger Martyn Bradbury says he’s fighting for ‘free speech’ &#8220;Blogger Martyn Bradbury says he’s prepared to go to jail on the principle of free speech, as an interim court decision reveals a complainant’s ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EDITORIAL:</strong> <em>By Martyn &#8220;Bomber&#8221; Bradbury, editor and publisher of <a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/">The Daily Blog</a></em></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/media-insider/media-insider-complainant-wants-apology-from-blogger-martyn-bradbury-but-hes-defiant-and-prepared-to-go-to-jail-on-basis-of-free-speech/premium/OXUZABQ2ABEUTINOLJPMODJATU/"><strong>Media Insider:</strong> Complainant wants apology and blog posts permanently removed; blogger Martyn Bradbury says he’s fighting for ‘free speech’</a></p></blockquote>
<div class="mx-4 my-0 max-w-240 sm:mx-6 md:mx-8 lg:mx-auto lg:flex lg:flex-wrap lg:items-stretch xl:max-w-270 pt-9" data-test-ui="v2-article-section-top">
<section class="v2-article__main" data-test-ui="article-section-top-main">
<section class="article__body article__content full-content" data-test-ui="article-top-body">
<p class=""><em>&#8220;Blogger Martyn Bradbury says he’s prepared to go to jail on the principle of free speech, as an interim court decision reveals a complainant’s assertions of emotional distress over blog posts.&#8221; &#8212; NZME</em></p>
</section>
</section>
</div>
<p>The good news is that I am not in prison. Yet.</p>
<figure id="attachment_131419" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131419" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-131419 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Daily-Blog-logo-300wide.png" alt="" width="300" height="107" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131419" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/"><strong>THE DAILY BLOG</strong></a></figcaption></figure>
<p>I am deeply disappointed about today&#8217;s Court Case that I can’t talk about.</p>
<p>My hope was that this appalling abuse of process would be thrown out.</p>
<p>It wasn’t.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/04/gagged-nz-editors-free-speech-case-adjourned-as-judge-warns-daily-blog-over-contempt-risk/"><strong>READ MORE: </strong> Gagged NZ editor’s ‘free speech’ case adjourned as judge warns Daily Blog over ‘contempt’ risk</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/media-insider/media-insider-complainant-wants-apology-from-blogger-martyn-bradbury-but-hes-defiant-and-prepared-to-go-to-jail-on-basis-of-free-speech/premium/OXUZABQ2ABEUTINOLJPMODJATU/">Complainant wants apology and blog posts permanently removed; blogger Martyn Bradbury says he’s fighting for ‘free speech’</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/361015484/blogger-warned-freedom-speech-not-absolute-and-watch-what-he-posts-amid-court-case">Blogger warned freedom of speech ‘not absolute’ and to watch what he posts amid court case</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/361055957/free-speech-union-says-hdca-remains-bad-law-blogger-faces-court-test">Martyn Bradbury says he’s ‘gagged’ as court battle over blog posts delayed; welcomes Free Speech Union support</a></li>
<li><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/i-am-now-legally-censored-from-even-talking-about-being-censored/">I am now legally censored from even talking about being censored</a> –- <em>The Daily Blog</em></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/03/why-i-am-willing-to-go-to-prison-tomorrow-for-free-speech-the-daily-blog-editor/">Why I am willing to go to prison tomorrow for Free Speech – The Daily Blog editor</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/03/sinister-free-speech-union-attacks-investigative-journalist-for-being-investigative/">Sinister ‘Free Speech Union’ attacks investigative journalist for being investigative</a></li>
</ul>
<p>I am now legally censored from even talking about being censored.</p>
<p>This is Free Speech in Aotearoa New Zealand 2026.</p>
<p>The court case continues next week &#8212; <a href="https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/MOJ01481.1-application-for-in-court-media-coverage-Apr18.pdf">I call on all Mainstream media to cover it</a></p>
<p>NZME, ZB, <em>The Post</em> and <em>Stuff</em> have covered the story.</p>
<p>RNZ and TVNZ, the public broadcasters, were both missing in action.</p>
<p><em>Republished from The Daily Blog.</em></p>
<div class="entry-content single-content">
<ul>
<li>Independent media is more important than ever, especially in the lead up to the Election. <em>TDB</em> is the largest leftwing blog in NZ and we have been operating for 13 years now. We get zero funding from NZ on Air and we don’t have rich backers.</li>
<li><a href="https://buy.stripe.com/9AQfZz3Fnf4AbXqdQQ"><strong>How to support <em>The Daily Blog</em></strong></a><em><strong><br />
</strong></em></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ&#8217;s shameful silence on Gaza is potentially complicity with genocide</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/04/nzs-shameful-silence-on-gaza-is-potentially-complicity-with-genocide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 23:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Tangata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza atrocities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli atrocities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Elders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment of Māori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaty partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two-state solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN obligations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The New Zealand government remains shamefully silent on Gaza, despite being a signatory to international agreements that oblige it to act, writes John Hobbs at E-Tangata. COMMENTARY: By John Hobbs A friend who lives in Gaza, just posted the following: &#8220;From the sea of Gaza, I do not look out . . . I stand ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The New Zealand government remains shamefully silent on Gaza, despite being a signatory to international agreements that oblige it to act, writes <strong>John Hobbs </strong>at E-Tangata.</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By John Hobbs</em></p>
<p>A friend who lives in Gaza, just posted the following:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;From the sea of Gaza, I do not look out . . . I stand on the edge of the world, shouting in a direction that does not hear, and I know that between me and them there is not just a sea, but a silence that is skilled at betrayal.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The New Zealand government has remained silent on the issue of genocide by Israel against the peoples of Gaza, despite numerous other countries publicly condemning Israel’s actions as genocide.</p>
<p>From time to time, the government might call for a “two-state solution”, join allies to issue protestations that the harm inflicted on the Palestinian people must stop, demand a ceasefire, or take part in various resolutions at the United Nations calling for an end to atrocities.</p>
<p>But all the while, the Israeli government rapidly expands its illegal settlements and continues to allow settlers to kill Palestinians under the watch of the Israeli Defence Force (IDF). Israel is doing everything it can to drive the remaining Palestinian people out of their villages and cities in Occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank.</p>
<p>The gap between the government’s insincere words and its willingness to take real action mirrors the coalition’s approach to Māori. Here at home, it claims to uphold, honour, and respect the Treaty relationship, all while rolling out policies to dismantle the rights owed to Māori as Treaty partners.</p>
<p>Just as it’s important to hold the government to account for domestic policy, it’s equally important to hold it to account for foreign policy. It’s erroneous to think that the two aren’t intimately connected.</p>
<p><strong>Disgraceful foreign policy</strong><br />
The government’s disgraceful foreign policy approach to Gaza and Palestine was shown up recently during a visit to the Occupied Palestinian Territories by former NZ prime minister Helen Clark and the former president of Ireland, Mary Robinson.</p>
<p>The women were there on behalf of “The Elders,” an independent group of global leaders founded by Nelson Mandela, working for peace, justice, human rights, and a sustainable planet. They stated: <em>“We believe that the policies of the current Israeli government are leading to Palestine disappearing in plain sight.”</em></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">STATEMENT | “Palestine must not disappear.”</p>
<p>Following their visit to the Middle East, Mary Robinson, Graça Machel, <a href="https://x.com/HelenClarkNZ?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HelenClarkNZ</a> and Hina Jilani call on leaders to act now to stop the disappearance of Palestine at the hands of the Israeli government.</p>
<p>Read the full statement… <a href="https://t.co/3crFe2bFnk">pic.twitter.com/3crFe2bFnk</a></p>
<p>— The Elders (@TheElders) <a href="https://x.com/TheElders/status/2078124954067890561?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 17, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>The evidence for this comes from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). In its Humanitarian Situation Report of June 19, 2026, it noted:</p>
<p><em>“6200 Palestinians, including more than 3000 children, have been forcibly displaced because of settler attacks and related access restrictions across 119 communities. Of these, more than 3,600 people were displaced from 46 communities that have effectively been erased, meaning they were completely emptied of their residents. In 2026 alone, as of mid-June, Israeli citizens, armed and backed by the army, have expelled 2200 Palestinians.”</em></p>
<p>This is what the person living in Gaza describes as the “silence that is skilled at betrayal”.</p>
<p>Just as it does with Māori, New Zealand uses laudable language to give the appearance of care and decency, but it is a veneer that masks deep insincerity and an unwillingness to take concrete steps to actively protect rights.</p>
<p>There is no doubt the coalition government has “betrayed” the Palestinian people of Gaza, the Occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. But in fact they’ve done worse. They have potentially made New Zealand complicit in the act of genocide.</p>
<p><strong>Not fulfilled obligations</strong><br />
It is likely that New Zealand has not fulfilled its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948, which requires that <em>“The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.”</em></p>
<p>Chris Sidoti is an international human rights lawyer, an expert on national human rights institutions, and a member of The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In a recent address in Wellington, he argued that, in addition to not committing genocide, states had an obligation to prevent it.</p>
<p><em>“States shall act to prevent the commission of genocide and shall punish the commission of genocide. New Zealand has an international legal obligation to act to prevent the commission of genocide.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;That does not require that genocide actually occur. My prime minister, from Australia, is very keen on saying we can’t say whether this is genocide or not. We’re waiting for the International Court of Justice to decide that issue, which may be in the next five or 10 years.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;That’s not the obligation. The obligation is to act to prevent genocide. It is a prior obligation, and it’s an obligation that is designed to ensure that genocide never exists. So it is an obligation in advance.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;In January 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued what are called provisional measures, which is like an injunction under your law and ours. And in issuing provisional measures, the Court said that there is a risk that the rights of Palestinians under the Genocide Convention are being or will be infringed. Now, you cannot get a more authoritative case. As of January 2024, all parties to the Genocide Convention have been under an obligation to act to prevent. And the question therefore is, what have you done?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I recently sought access, through the Official Information Act, to the advice received by the government on New Zealand’s complicity under the Genocide Convention. The government’s decision to withhold the information was reviewed by the Office of the Ombudsman, which in turn supported the government’s right to withhold the advice under legal privilege, as in their view it was not outweighed by the public interest in releasing that information.</p>
<p>How could it not be in the public interest to understand New Zealand’s obligation to act, or otherwise, to prevent genocide?</p>
<p><strong>Labour&#8217;s principled stance</strong><br />
Recently, Labour’s foreign policy spokesperson, Vanushi Walters, visited Canberra and met with Noura Saleh, Chargé d’Affaires for the State of Palestine. She is the Palestinian ambassador responsible for the diplomatic relationship between Palestine and Australia and New Zealand.</p>
<p>The last time New Zealand had one-to-one diplomatic engagement with the Canberra-based Palestinian Authority ambassador to New Zealand and Australia was in 2022, when Izzat Salah Abdulhadi visited Wellington at the invitation of former foreign minister Nanaia Mahuta.</p>
<p>That the current government has had no engagement with the ambassador speaks volumes. It’s another example of silence, and silencing.</p>
<p>Sure, New Zealand engages diplomatically at the UN and through its ambassadors in Türkiye and Egypt, but this is all done behind closed doors. The absence of any effort to build a relationship with the Palestinian Authority closer to home is another dimension of betrayal.</p>
<p>What is particularly important as a result of Vanushi Walters’ engagement with Noura Saleh is that she articulated the Labour Party position on Palestine heading into the 2026 election.</p>
<p>Walters stated that Labour was clear about what it would have done if in government now: <em>“We would have recognised Palestine. We would have sanctioned Israel. We would have looked to join South Africa’s case against Israel at the ICJ. We would have ensured that New Zealand complies with the ICJ opinion on the Occupied Territories.”</em></p>
<p>This is similar to the Green Party and Te Pāti Māori positions. Both parties have consistently called out Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide, and criticised the government for failing to prohibit New Zealand entities from engaging with illegal settlements in the West Bank.</p>
<p><strong>Illegal engagement</strong><br />
Such engagement is illegal under international law, as reflected in a UN Security Council resolution (UNSC 2334), which New Zealand co-sponsored in 2016. The resolution states that nations must cease engagement with settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.</p>
<p>Successive New Zealand governments have ignored this requirement and continue to do so.</p>
<p>Last year, the Green Party championed a private member’s bill, which sought to apply sanctions against Israel for its illegal occupation and rapid expansion of settlements in the Palestinian territories. The bill, modelled on the Russia Sanctions Act 2022, which imposed sanctions on Russia for invading Ukraine, was supported by Labour and Te Pāti Māori, but the coalition government opposed it.</p>
<p>It is time to support those political parties that more accurately reflect the values of compassion, kindness, and human decency, as expressed through tikanga Māori.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://e-tangata.co.nz/author/john/">John Hobbs</a> has been a career public servant, working for various government departments and ministers. He has a Master of Commerce (Hons) in Economics from the University of Auckland and a Master of Arts (Thesis) with Distinction in Peace and Conflict Studies, from the University of Otago. He is currently undertaking a PhD at Te Ao o Rongomaraeroa, The National Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies &#8212; Te Tumu School of Māori, Pacific and Indigenous Studies, Otago University.</em></p>
<p><em>This article was first published by E-Tangata and is republished with the author&#8217;s permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I am willing to go to prison tomorrow for Free Speech – The Daily Blog editor</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/03/why-i-am-willing-to-go-to-prison-tomorrow-for-free-speech-the-daily-blog-editor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 11:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auckland District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Locke Memorial Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bradbury Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponising free speech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: By The Daily Blog editor and publisher Martyn Bradbury Daily Blog editor and publisher Martyn &#8220;Bomber&#8221; Bradbury yesterday declared he has been served &#8220;legal directives . . . under pain of 6 months imprisonment or a $5000 fine to censor 4 blogs&#8221;. He also declared: &#8220;We can’t tell you who is doing this. &#8220;We ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="header reader-header reader-show-element">
<p><strong>EDITORIAL: </strong><em>By The Daily Blog editor and publisher Martyn Bradbury</em><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><em><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/">Daily Blog</a> editor and publisher Martyn &#8220;Bomber&#8221; Bradbury yesterday declared he has been served &#8220;legal directives . . . under pain of 6 months imprisonment or a $5000 fine to censor 4 blogs&#8221;.</em></p>
<figure id="attachment_131419" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131419" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/why-i-am-willing-to-go-to-prison-tomorrow-for-free-speech/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-131419 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Daily-Blog-logo-300wide.png" alt="" width="300" height="107" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131419" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/why-i-am-willing-to-go-to-prison-tomorrow-for-free-speech/"><strong>THE DAILY BLOG</strong></a></figcaption></figure>
<p><em>He also declared:</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We can’t tell you who is doing this.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We can’t tell you why it’s being done.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We can’t tell you how it’s being done.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;And we can’t tell you what has been censored.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>Today he has declared that he is willing to go to prison for Free Speech when he is due to appear in the Auckland District Court. His reasons why?</em></p>
<p><em>This is what he said in a speech given at this year&#8217;s Keith Locke Memorial Debate on Free Speech last month.</em></p>
<p><em>Moderator:</em> Jane Kelsey<br />
<em>For the Affirmative:</em> Martyn Bradbury (leader), Verity Johnson, Thomas Beagle<br />
<em>For the Negative: </em>Simon Wilson (leader), Anjum Rahman, Yasmine Serhan</p>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/03/sinister-free-speech-union-attacks-investigative-journalist-for-being-investigative/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Sinister ‘Free Speech Union’ attacks investigative journalist for being investigative</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/361055197/martyn-bradbury-says-he-faces-prison-over-blog-posts-free-speech-union-not-across-it">Martyn Bradbury says he faces prison over blog posts; Free Speech Union ‘not across’ it</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/02/the-daily-blog-we-have-secretly-been-taken-to-court-and-im-facing-6-months-in-prison-we-cant-tell-you-who-how-why-or-what/">The Daily Blog: We have secretly been taken to court and I’m facing 6 months in prison: We can’t tell you who, how, why or what</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Comrades I bring Bread and Roses.</p>
<p>Kia Ora to the esteemed members of the Keith Locke Memorial Debate group and thank you for putting this evening&#8217;s event on, our civil society is deeply grateful to you.</p>
<p>Greetings to the Left Wing Legend and recreational Jedi that is Professor Jane Kelsey as moderator.</p>
<p>Solidarity to those here tonight in person who keep Keith’s legacy alight with your participation and to the many, many, many millions watching this debate live right now online.</p>
<p>We thank you for your attention to these urgent matters in our nation as misinformation, disinformation and social media hate algorithms warp the political debate so much so that they now corrode the very foundational values of our democracy.</p>
<p>I salute my worthy opposition, for they are about to die &#8212; not literally, but metaphorically.</p>
<p>Tonight I have the privilege of being leader of the affirmative Team as we debate the moot Hate Speech Laws threaten free speech.</p>
<p>This evening my team mate, famous civil rights lawyer and custodian for civil liberties, Thomas Beagle, will convincingly argue that hate speech laws are a threat to freedom of expression and are legally difficult to define.</p>
<p>After Thomas, the third team mate of our group, well known newspaper columnist and defender of free speech, Verity Johnston, who will expand on why anyone would trust the State with something as important as Free Speech because would anyone in this room seriously trust Chris Luxon, David Seymour or Winston Peters to define what free speech should be?</p>
<p>They seem to need help defining what a woman is.</p>
<p>Or what a limousine is.</p>
<p>Or what a healthy school lunch is.</p>
<p>Or what a war crime is.</p>
<p>You know what, let’s just send the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister a dictionary before we get them to define hate speech laws.</p>
<p>Comrades &#8212; my name is Martyn &#8220;Bomber&#8221; Bradbury, which is a terrible nickname for airport security. I am the editor of <em>The Daily Blog</em>, New Zealand&#8217;s largest leftwing blog and host of the weekly political podcast, <em>The Bradbury Group</em> and I have some thoughts on free speech.</p>
<p>My job tonight as captain of this evening’s Affirmative team, is not just to convince you that Hate Speech Laws threaten free speech, oh no, that would be too easy a task.</p>
<p>No offence Simon.</p>
<p>Brothers and sisters, tonight I won’t just strive to convince you that Hate Speech Laws threaten free speech, tonight I will challenge and argue and debate that the NZ Left itself should surge forward and retake the mantle of free speech champions from the Right who have been allowed to weaponise free speech and rob it of its legitimacy.</p>
<p>Tonight I cry out to the NZ Left, don’t merely accept free speech, consensually embrace and champion it!</p>
<p>Our desire as a movement to protect minorities without power from feral and oppressive insults and harassment has been twisted by the Right into a narrative of Woke Big Brother censoring opinions.</p>
<p>We must take this moment as a movement to reflect on why Free Speech is so important.</p>
<p>Our nation, Aotearoa New Zealand, whakapapas to a unique Te Ao Māori worldview and an 800-year Western democratic tradition that takes us back to the Magna Carta, the values of which have been sharpened and tested over centuries of friction between King and Citizen, Tory and Whig, Catholic and Protestant.</p>
<p>These Western Democratic values hold a gravity to their logic that demands a citizen engage and protects:</p>
<ul>
<li>Free Speech.</li>
<li>No taxation without representation.</li>
<li>The recognition of the rights of the individual</li>
<li>Freedom of religion</li>
<li>Separation of Powers,</li>
<li>Rule of law, and</li>
<li>An independent judiciary.</li>
</ul>
<p>Not only are these truths self evident, they demand from us more than mere lip service if we are to defend the institutions now under attack.</p>
<p>I want to note clearly from the start that we are not Free Speech Absolutists.</p>
<p>You can’t yell fire in a theatre and then be blameless for the crush afterwards.</p>
<p>You can’t defame someone and you cannot incite violence nor harass or intimidate others.</p>
<p>Take Bishop Brian Tamaki, no please take him.</p>
<p>The Bish claims he was using free speech to criticise churches being attacked by extremist Hindu Nationalists in India.</p>
<p>Ok, he has the free speech and right to be critical of that.</p>
<p>But then he called on his nutty cultist followers to purge Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus from NZ while calling on his nutty cultist followers to burn down mosques and temples.</p>
<p>Disgraceful and disgusting!</p>
<p>Free speech does not allow you to incite violence on others, and that’s exactly what he did. The police shouldn’t just be turning up at his house to seize his guns, they should be arresting him for a multitude of existing laws.</p>
<p>There are 3 laws the Bishop has broken here:</p>
<ul>
<li>Incitement to commit an offence</li>
<li>Threatening or intimidating behaviour, and</li>
<li>Inciting racial disharmony</li>
</ul>
<p>We don’t need new hate speech laws, we just need enforcement of the existing laws!</p>
<p>Comrades &#8212;  hate speech laws are never used against those we on the Left feel should be punished.</p>
<p>We imagine when we push for hate speech laws that it is the racists, the homophobes, the  bigots who will get arrested, but the State has a long, long, long history &#8212; as laid out by Keith’s own indomitable sister Maire Leadbeater in her remarkable book, <em>The Enemy Within</em> which charts how the State has abused its surveillance powers using trumped up charges of hate speech.</p>
<p>Hone Harawira was under state surveillance, Nicky Hager was, I was, unions were, environmentalists were, Keith Lock himself was under State surveillance since he was 11 years old.</p>
<p>When an 11-year-old Keith Locke is defined as a threat to the State, how are any of us safe?</p>
<p>The majority of the political prisoners in the UK right now are environmentalists and Palestine Action protestors.</p>
<p>If I merely said the words, &#8220;Palestine action&#8221; in the UK right now I’d be arrested.</p>
<p>Hate speech laws are never used against the people we believe they should be used against, they are always overwhelmingly used by the State to suppress and shut down any debate they feel threatened by.</p>
<p>The Free Speech Union is an astro turf front group that is part of the Taxpayer’s Union cabal of manipulation. They have weaponised free speech using a narrative that the Left want to censor and tonight I put to you that the Left should not be in the business of censoring anyone, but should instead champion free speech so that we can speak truth to power.</p>
<p>Nine times out of 10, the red line for any of these so called rightwing free speech champions is any criticism of the appalling war crimes by Israel, crimes so bad they technically breach genocide levels. The moment you start criticising Israel suddenly it’s antisemitic hate speech.</p>
<p>The Left needs to take back the power of our Free Speech.</p>
<p>Hate Speech laws are not used against those spouting filth towards our migrant brothers and sisters, they are used to strangle off legitimate criticism and put guardrails up about what is and what is not permissible in the public sphere of debate.</p>
<p>Go after those spouting filth with defamation action, or existing anti-harassment laws or when the speech incites violence, arrest them then, but don’t create the perception that we are censoring free speech when free speech is instrumental to our own capacity as a movement to hold the powerful to account.</p>
<ul>
<li>Champion free speech by broadening those who can access it.</li>
<li>Champion Free speech by engaging with the debate.</li>
<li>Champion Free speech by challenging power.</li>
</ul>
<p>There is a reason why Free Speech is a foundational value of our Western democratic tradition, tampering with it generates immediate backlash because it is such a foundational value.</p>
<p>We become weaker as a movement when we cancel the speech of those we detest and we lose the ability to persuade others of the strength of our ideas.</p>
<p>Brothers and Sisters, tonight isn’t just about Hate Speech Laws threatening free speech, tonight is about us as a movement recognising the 800-year tradition our values, whakapapa.</p>
<p>Free Speech isn’t a nice to have from an archaic time, it is the essential oxygen to a Democracy that risks igniting opposition by creating hate speech laws rather than promoting Free Speech solidarity to speak truth to power.</p>
<p>Comrades, I call upon the opening of this debate in earnest</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
</div>
<p><em>… you either believe in Free Speech or you don’t.</em></p>
<p><em>I do.</em></p>
<p><em>I can’t tell you who is doing this.</em></p>
<p><em>I can’t tell you what has been censored.</em></p>
<p><em>I can’t tell you why.</em></p>
<p><em>I can’t tell you what.</em></p>
<p><em>I can’t tell you how.</em></p>
<p><em>I am making it clear in court tomorrow.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@TheBradburyGroup">The Bradbury Group</a> is booked to go live 8pm on Tuesday – but <strong>IF</strong> I am in prison, Matthew Tukaki from Waatea will step in as host.</em></p>
<p><em>You either believe in Free Speech or you don’t.</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sinister ‘Free Speech Union’ attacks investigative journalist for being investigative</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/03/sinister-free-speech-union-attacks-investigative-journalist-for-being-investigative/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 11:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Vance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural competence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martyn Bradbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Medical Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Nursing Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sinister attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Post]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[POLITICAL BYTES: By Ian Powell On June 6, I published a Political Bytes post criticising the mis-named &#8220;Free Speech Union&#8221; (FSU) for opposing the exercise of free speech, in the context of fulfilling his duty of care for student wellbeing, by Otago University vice-chancellor Grant Robertson when raising a personal concern: Opposing free speech in ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>POLITICAL BYTES:</strong> <em>By Ian Powell</em></p>
<p>On June 6, I published a <em>Political Bytes</em> post criticising the mis-named &#8220;Free Speech Union&#8221; (FSU) for opposing the exercise of free speech, in the context of fulfilling his duty of care for student wellbeing, by Otago University vice-chancellor Grant Robertson when raising a personal concern: <a href="https://politicalbytes.blog/2026/06/06/hypocrisy-of-free-speech-union-opposing-free-speech-in-practice/">Opposing free speech in practice</a>.</p>
<p>In my words:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The self-styled Free Speech Union has complained to Otago University over its vice-chancellor Grant Robertson both expressing his personal views on a NZ First parliamentary bill seeking to define what is a woman and what is a man and for his assessment on the 2026 Budget as it impacted universities.&#8221;</em></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.thepost.co.nz/nz-news/361055197/martyn-bradbury-says-he-faces-prison-over-blog-posts-free-speech-union-not-across-it"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Martyn Bradbury says he faces prison over blog posts; Free Speech Union ‘not across’ it</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/02/the-daily-blog-we-have-secretly-been-taken-to-court-and-im-facing-6-months-in-prison-we-cant-tell-you-who-how-why-or-what/">The Daily Blog: We have secretly been taken to court and I’m facing 6 months in prison: We can’t tell you who, how, why or what</a></li>
<li><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/why-i-am-willing-to-go-to-prison-tomorrow-for-free-speech/">The Daily Blog: Why I am willing to go to prison tomorrow for Free Speech &#8212; <em>Martyn Bradbury</em></a></li>
</ul>
<p>I concluded the post as follows:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Attacking Grant Robertson for exercising his duty of care for student wellbeing crassly exposes the cloak of hypocrisy that the Free Speech Union hides beneath.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;It would be the honest thing for the Free Speech Union to rename itself as the ‘Selective Free Speech Union’ or the ‘Free Speech for the Political Right Union’. Just saying!&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>Sinister FSU attack on investigative journalist<br />
</strong>As sceptical as I was about the credibility of the FSU’s claimed commitment to genuine free speech, I never expected nearly two months later its sinister attack on an investigative journalist for being investigative in her questions to Health Minister Simeon Brown.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>The attack was reported (paywalled) by <em>The Post</em> deputy editor Luke Malpass (July 28):  <a href="https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361012020/free-speech-union-attacks-reporter-asking-minister-questions">FSU attacks reporter for asking health minister questions</a>.</p>
<p>The context was what I have previously described in my health systems blog <em>Otaihanga Second Opinion</em> (July 2) as a purging of the Medical Council leadership: <a href="https://otaihangasecondopinion.wpcomstaging.com/2026/07/02/health-minister-purges-regulatory-health-practitioner-authorities-for-carrying-out-their-statutory-function/">Health minister purges Medical Council leadership</a>.</p>
<p><strong>At the heart of the issue<br />
</strong>At the heart of the issue was the minister’s express ideological opposition to the council’s recognition of the importance of doctors understanding &#8220;cultural competence&#8221; or &#8220;safety&#8221; when caring for and treating patients.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>But it went further. Brown is proposing a law change requiring the Medical Council and the other health regulatory authorities, such as the Nursing Council, to carry out government policies.</p>
<p>In other words, end the arms-length independent relationship between health practitioner regulatory authorities and government by enabling political interference in their work thereby undermining their prime statutory purpose of ensuring public safety.</p>
<p><strong>Daring to ask questions<br />
</strong>Luke Malpass reports that the day before publication of his article (Monday, July 27) <em>The Post</em>’s national affairs editor Andrea Vance emailed a series of questions to the Health Minister about his appointment of Dr Manoja Kalupahana to the Medical Council.</p>
<p>This had been announced on the Beehive website earlier that day (gazetted the previous Friday).</p>
<p>In his words:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Before an answer was received and within three hours of the query going to the minister, the Free Speech Union issued a press release attacking Vance for even asking the questions.&#8221;</em></p>
<figure style="width: 1024px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/dr-manoja-kalupahana.webp?w=1024" alt="Dr Manoja Kalupahana" width="1024" height="578" data-attachment-id="1496" data-permalink="https://politicalbytes.blog/2026/08/03/sinister-free-speech-union-attacks-investigative-journalist-for-being-investigative/dr-manoja-kalupahana/" data-orig-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/dr-manoja-kalupahana.webp" data-orig-size="1240,700" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="Dr Manoja Kalupahana" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/dr-manoja-kalupahana.webp?w=750" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Dr Manoja Kalupahana . . . her appointment process questioned. Image: politicalbytes.blog</figcaption></figure>
<p>Vance’s questions were about the process of the appointment, rather than the suitability or political views, of Dr Manoja Kalupahana.</p>
<p>Again in his words:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;They focused on the appointment process: whether Brown was aware of her previous public profile before appointing her to the Medical Council; whether officials, Health New Zealand or the council were consulted; whether any concerns were raised about public confidence; and whether the minister had discussed the appointment with the Free Speech Union.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>These were all good questions by a quality investigative journalist. Consequently it was surprising that later the same day the FSU, to whom the minister’s office had promptly forwarded her questions, released a media statement stridently attacking her for her action.</p>
<p>Malpass described FSU’s attack as accusing Vance of an attempt to put Dr Kalupahana’s “lawful political views” on trial and warning against ideological tests for public appointments.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>However, none of Vance’s questions involved Dr Kalupahana’s political views. They were about the appointment process, including a suspicion about FSU involvement.</p>
<p>For context, in 2023, Dr Kalupahana’s social media activity became the subject of a workplace complaint and media scrutiny.</p>
<p>A <em>Stuff</em> reporter had contacted her seeking comment about her online posts and their relevance to her role as a doctor. However, no story was published.</p>
<p>Nevertheless Malpass reports that the controversy “…became a cause célèbre for the FSU, which argued it showed health professionals could face consequences for expressing lawful opinions outside their clinical roles”.</p>
<p>Also published on July 28 was Andrea Vance’s own paywalled piece on the issue providing further context and background: <a href="https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361012000/doctor-centre-free-speech-row-appointed-medical-council">Doctor at centre of ‘free speech’ row appointed to Medical Council</a>.</p>
<p>Dr Kalupahana was, in fact, one of four new announced ministerial appointments to the council. As it turns out, she is a member of the FSU. Another doctor appointed to the council, Dr Roderick Mulgan, is on the FSU governing board and former president.</p>
<p>The fallout from the controversy over the Health Minister’s appointment process and FSU’s defence of it continued in <em>Stuff</em> (as the owner of <em>The Post</em>) later the same day with an article by senior political reporter Anneke Smith: <a href="https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361012233/labour-accuses-simeon-brown-using-personal-troll-farm-attack-reporter-pm-relaxed-about-matter">Health minister accused of using ‘personal troll farm&#8217; to attack reporter</a>.</p>
<p><strong>And there is more<br />
</strong>The FSU got it badly wrong. Andrea Vance is not one for being intimidated into silence.</p>
<p>On July 29, she followed up with another paywalled article that revealed political intrigue (arguably scheming) into the escalating controversy: <a href="https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/361012647/second-free-speech-union-figure-appointed-regulate-doctors-after-meeting-minister">FSU lobbies health minister over regulating doctors</a>.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>In her words:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;A former chairperson of the Free Speech Union (FSU) &#8212; who lobbied Health Minister Simeon Brown over proposed changes to how doctors are regulated &#8212; has been appointed to the Medical Council.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Roderick Mulgan, who remains a board member of the FSU, was one of four new members appointed to the council by Brown last week. That includes senior Auckland anaesthetist Manoja Kalupahana, whose anonymous social media activity became the focus of a high-profile FSU campaign. The others are Derek Sherwood and Andie Cook.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The appointments come as Brown moves to give ministers greater powers over how doctors are regulated and the rules they must follow. He has also overhauled the Medical Council, declining to reappoint its chairperson and deputy in June.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;In May 2025, Mulgan and Kalupahana met with Brown in Auckland as part of an FSU delegation to discuss concerns about freedom of speech and conscience rights in healthcare, including cases involving doctors facing disciplinary action.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;A Health Ministry briefing prepared for the meeting identified Mulgan as FSU chairperson at the time. It recorded that the organisation wanted to discuss its correspondence with the Minister, the Government’s consultation on health workforce and patient prioritisation, and cases before the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The group argues health regulators have moved beyond their role by requiring practitioners to engage with particular views on issues such as Māori health inequities, colonisation and gender.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The meeting was requested by the FSU and included then chief executive Jonathan Ayling, and liaison adviser Stephanie Martin.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>Spilling the ideological beans</strong></p>
<p>Spilling the beans is an often used idiom for when secret information is released, usually inadvertently.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>In a paywalled article published in <em>NZ Doctor</em> (July 28) health journalist Alan Perrott reports a possibly hyped FSU spilling its own ideological beans.</p>
<p>Perrott attributes this &#8220;bean-spilling&#8221; (my word, not his) to the above-mentioned Dr Mulgan (former FSU president and current board member) as follows:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Stating that Māori are &#8216;disadvantaged because of systemic biases in the system&#8217; represents a &#8216;well-known hard-left view&#8217;, says specialist GP and newly appointed Medical Council member Roderick Mulgan.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Such a view holds &#8216;that there are nebulous biases in the world and in the health system that somehow or other undermine the welfare of Māori just because they are Māori,&#8217; Dr Mulgan says.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Dr Mulgan made the comments to The Platform host Sean Plunket on 25 March while discussing three draft consultation documents on cultural safety and competence and hauora Māori released by the Medical Council.</em><em> </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Dr Mulgan, also a lawyer and international director of the Free Speech Union, is one of four new appointments confirmed yesterday by Health Minister Simeon Brown, six weeks after Mr Brown changed the authority’s leadership.</em><em> </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;On the consultation documents, Dr Mulgan says: &#8216;Whether or not these perspectives [as laid out in the documents] are valid or reasonable, it is highly contested.</em><em> </em></p>
<p><em>“&#8217;So, there are plenty of people who will say yes they are, and there will be plenty of people saying no they’re not, and it is not for regulatory bodies to pick sides in a contested ideological debate and mandate that its members, by reason of being members, must support these perspectives.&#8217;</em><em> &#8221;</em></p>
<p>Dr Mulgan is at the very least as ideological as those he criticises are. The fact that he used the hard rightwing <em>The Platform</em> to make his claims is indicative.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>Linking colonialisation in different ways to Māori health inequities is not confined to a  “hard-left” (whatever that means), well-known or otherwise.</p>
<p>While this link is certainly not a unanimous view, it is a view shared by many well-beyond the &#8220;hard left&#8221;, including those of &#8220;soft-left&#8221;, liberal and compassionate conservative opinions.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>Perrott includes a response to Dr Mulgan from another specialist GP, Dr Rawiri McKree Jansen:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;…the statements made by his colleague are &#8216;troubling and disturbing&#8217; and in denial of systemic biases within healthcare.</em><em> </em></p>
<p><em>“We need better representation on the Medical Council than the ideological perspective he brings.”</em><em> </em></p>
<p><strong>Where does the FSU stand on a threat to real free speech?<br />
</strong>There are many issues raised in the above discussion, particularly the threat to patient safety by the political undermining of the statutory health practitioner regulatory authorities.</p>
<p>However, that is more appropriate for my health system blog <em>Otaihanga Second Opinion</em>.</p>
<figure style="width: 800px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/cloak-of-hypocrisy.jpg?w=800" alt="The FSU is characterised by a cloak of hypocrisy" width="800" height="661" data-attachment-id="1506" data-permalink="https://politicalbytes.blog/2026/08/03/sinister-free-speech-union-attacks-investigative-journalist-for-being-investigative/cloak-of-hypocrisy-4/" data-orig-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/cloak-of-hypocrisy.jpg" data-orig-size="800,661" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="Cloak of hypocrisy" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/cloak-of-hypocrisy.jpg?w=750" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">The FSU is characterised by a cloak of hypocrisy. Cartoon: China Daily</figcaption></figure>
<p>In this post I focus on the hypocrisy and political tactics of the FSU. Regardless of its name, an organisation that attacks an investigative journalist for investigating a subject that is contrary to the organisation’s political ideology is itself an opponent of free speech.</p>
<p>Instead, it is nothing more than a mask for hard-rightwing trolls. But now an opportunity presents itself for FSU to partly (ever so slightly) redeem itself.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FTheDailyBlogNZ%2Fposts%2Fpfbid02eehn2vgrmsg4mCFcyc3j39YV8ATkTQpBYrcsz3reYMGpY59mes37JPbT3xHo46Sjl&amp;show_text=true&amp;width=500" width="500" height="424" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>&#8220;Bomber&#8221; Bradbury is the prolific editor of the leftwing <em>The Daily Blog</em>. On August 2 he reported a particularly vicious legal threat: <a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/breaking-free-speech-issue-the-daily-blog-has-secretly-been-taken-to-court-and-im-facing-6months-in-prison-we-cant-tell-you-who-how-why-or-what/">Secretly threatened with potential six months imprisonment</a>. [Disclosure: <em>The Daily Blog</em> republishes with permission my blog posts]</p>
<p>His blog has been served legal directives under pain of six months imprisonment or a $5000 fine to censor four blog posts. He describes the intimidatory threat this way:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;We can’t tell you who is doing this.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We can’t tell you why it’s being done.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;We can’t tell you how it’s being done.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;And we can’t tell you what has been censored.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Bradbury is constrained by legal secrecy but hopes that all these matters can be exposed in an Auckland District Court hearing scheduled for August 4. A ruling allows media to cover this in the courtroom.</p>
<p>Bomber Bradbury is not noted for quietness. In fact, few can surpass him for noise. But now something has; the deafening silence of the Free Speech Union over this nasty threat to free speech makes the editor of <em>The Daily Blog</em> mute by comparison.</p>
<p>Why is this so? Is it simply because the FSU is a hard rightwing troll organisation? Or is it something even more sinister? Just asking.</p>
<p><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><em><a href="https://otaihangasecondopinion.wordpress.com/about/">Ian Powell</a> is a progressive health, labour market and political “no-frills” forensic commentator in New Zealand. A former senior doctors union leader for more than 30 years, he blogs at <a href="https://otaihangasecondopinion.wordpress.com/">Second Opinion</a> and <a href="https://otaihangasecondopinion.wordpress.com/politicalbytes/">Political Bytes</a>, where this article was first published. Republished with the author’s permission.</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Minto: When TVNZ&#8217;s Israeli &#8216;counter-terrorism&#8217; op against Palestinians is actually a lie</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/03/john-minto-when-tvnzs-israeli-counter-terrorism-op-against-palestinians-is-actually-a-lie/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 07:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli pograms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied West Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settler attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealing Palestinian land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violent attacks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By John Minto Television New Zealand outdid itself last week. For decades it has been a direct funnel for Israeli propaganda into our living rooms and last week TVNZ news editors managed to turn an Israeli pogrom against a Palestinian community into the need for Israel to launch a &#8220;major counter-terrorism operation&#8221; against Palestinians. ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By John Minto</em></p>
<p>Television New Zealand outdid itself last week.</p>
<p>For decades it has been a direct funnel for Israeli propaganda into our living rooms and last week TVNZ news editors managed to turn an Israeli pogrom against a Palestinian community into the need for Israel to launch a &#8220;major counter-terrorism operation&#8221; against Palestinians.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/2/israel-kills-five-in-gaza-despite-trumps-hamas-disarmament-plan"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Israel kills 19 in Gaza as attacks escalate despite latest Trump plan</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine+resistance">Other Palestinian resistance reports</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=John+Minto">Other John Minto reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Here is the complaint we have lodged with TVNZ:</p>
<p><em>Complaint Re 1News 6pm news bulletin on <a href="https://www.1news.co.nz/2026/07/26/israel-detains-over-70-following-deadly-violence-in-the-west-bank/">Saturday, 25 July 2026</a>, under the free to air broadcasting standard #6 related to accuracy.</em></p>
<p><strong>Context</strong><br />
The context in which this news item was presented to viewers is that Israeli settlers, backed by the Israeli military, have been conducting violent attacks on Palestinian communities across the Occupied West Bank over many years, but most intensively over the past three years.</p>
<p>These attacks have been labelled pogroms where Palestinians have been killed, their houses and cars torched, their property destroyed, their livestock stolen and no redress available from the Israeli state.</p>
<p>This situation has been documented exhaustively by the United Nations, human rights groups in Israel and internationally &#8212; including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.</p>
<p>There are thousands of videos online recorded these attacks as well as numerous in-depth analyses showing this is a central strategy of the Israeli state to steal Palestinian land and dispossess the Palestinian people.</p>
<p>The New Zealand government has a public list of the most notorious of these settlers who it refuses to let enter New Zealand.</p>
<p>All this would have been known to <em>1News</em> editors even if <em>1News</em> has chosen not to inform the wider public in any significant manner in its news bulletins.</p>
<figure id="attachment_131501" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131501" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-131501" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Israeli-attacks-25July26-1News-680wide.png" alt="Israeli attacks on the Occupied West Bank" width="680" height="353" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Israeli-attacks-25July26-1News-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Israeli-attacks-25July26-1News-680wide-300x156.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131501" class="wp-caption-text">Israeli attacks on the Occupied West Bank . . . following illegal settlers&#8217; pogram against Palestinians. Image: INews screenshot APR</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>1News report on Saturday, 25 July, 6pm</strong><br />
The news report included some indeterminate footage with the <em>1News</em> presenter saying:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Israel has launched a major counterterrorism offensive in the Occupied West Bank following a deadly clash between Palestinian residents and Israeli settlers and security forces. </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Four Palestinians and two Israelis including a security guard and a soldier were killed in the incident in a village south of Nablus. Several others from both groups were injured.</em><br />
<em>Palestinians say settlers targeted their homes. Israel says a group of Israeli hikers were attacked.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>Our complaint</strong><br />
<em>1News</em> framed the report in Israeli propaganda terms by stating “Israel has launched a major counterterrorism offensive”.</p>
<p><em>1News</em> failed to attribute its description of a “counterterrorism offensive” to whatever Israeli sources it was relying on to frame it in such a way.</p>
<p>A “counterterrorism offensive” is an Israeli government claim. <em>1News</em> has reported it as a fact, that Israel is responding and not initiating action, and that the nature of that action is “counterterrorism”.</p>
<p>The <em>1News</em> claim is similar to the non-attribution of a statement made by <em>ThreeNews</em>, for which the BSA upheld a complaint, on 22 April 2025-081, when the reporter stated that “Israel chose to respond to … ceasefire violations”.</p>
<p>In the July 25 instance, viewers are told by <em>1News</em> that Israel was responding to a terrorist attack, or attacks, of some sort.</p>
<p>However, it was blatantly clear to anyone who had read any online reports that the recent violence started as a co-ordinated settler pogrom against a Palestinian community with the Israeli government endorsed aim of ethnic cleansing.</p>
<p>The <em>1News</em> framing editorially points the finger at Palestinians as the attackers/aggressors and Israelis as the victims &#8212; the inverse of the truth.<br />
<em><br />
1News’</em> presentation of Israel’s justification for its “counterterrorism offensive” is a response to “an attack on Israeli hikers”.</p>
<p>This Israeli explanation would have been ignored or pointed out as not true, if it had been subjected to basic journalistic scrutiny.</p>
<p>In the context of the incident described above it was so implausible as to be laughable.</p>
<p>Hikers don’t set fire to vehicles, destroy property and terrorise Palestinian families. There was plenty of evidence available for <em>1News</em> to ignore or dismiss Israel’s explanation.</p>
<p>Alongside the lead-in to the story, the <em>1News</em> description of a “deadly clash”’ is an assumption of it being Palestinians who were in the wrong.</p>
<p>The <em>1News</em> report helps give political cover to Israel to continue its ethnic cleansing policies against Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.</p>
<p>It encourages viewers to see Palestinians as the problem. Such framing of events gives Israel impunity in its war crimes (ethnic cleansing is a war crime).</p>
<p>It is literally a deadly framing for Palestinians.</p>
<p>This <em>1News</em> report, like the majority of Western agency reporting on the Middle East, centres Israeli narratives, Israeli explanations and Israeli justifications with barely a passing nod to Palestinians.</p>
<p>The report amounts to a lie.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.psna.nz/">John Minto</a> is national campaign coordinator of the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA). Republished from PSNA with permission.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saige England: We spoke truth to power and the powerful folded</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/03/saige-england-we-spoke-truth-to-power-and-the-powerful-folded/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 05:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antiwar protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christchurch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christchurch City Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DP World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberation poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyttelton Port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime Transport Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealanders for A Democratic Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privatisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solidarity songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth to power]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Saige England Failing To Report for Duty I&#8217;m feeling guilty at not writing down all the speeches: the speeches by people whose voices I recorded, the speeches by people whose notes I photographed, like the speech by Mark the impassioned unionist, who pointed out that the bastards on the top floor are still ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Saige England</em></p>
<p><strong>Failing To Report for Duty</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m feeling guilty at not writing down<br />
all the speeches: the speeches by people<br />
whose voices I recorded, the speeches by<br />
people whose notes I photographed, like<br />
the speech by Mark the impassioned unionist,<br />
who pointed out that the bastards on the top<br />
floor are still meeting behind closed doors,<br />
or<br />
the speech by Josephine the impassioned<br />
professor who pointed out that the leaders<br />
who don&#8217;t listen to the people are pushing<br />
the people towards a revolution.<br />
or<br />
the speech by Claire who spoke about<br />
the doctor in Gaza who has been imprisoned<br />
and tortured for treating the victims shot in the<br />
chest and between the eyes, little children,<br />
a doctor who kept on trying to save the<br />
children after his own child died. Imprisoned<br />
now. What was his crime?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m feeling guilty about not getting it all<br />
down, not writing each speech into a story,<br />
for a news stream that would reach everyone<br />
that would lead to the biggest change ever &#8211;<br />
one story that would topple the tyrants and<br />
change the world.</p>
<p>Like one of those stories I thought I would write<br />
when I wanted to become a journalist and then<br />
I became a journalist and I tried to write down<br />
all the speeches and nothing<br />
changed nothing<br />
at all.<br />
&#8212; <em>Saige England</em></p>
<p>Okay, so that&#8217;s the poem. And though it sounds a tad hopeless we did have a <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/07/30/saige-england-people-environment-win-dp-world-showdown-but-port-predator-fight-goes-on/">success last week</a>. So I do have hope. It&#8217;s a struggle but we must unite and not give up.</p>
<p>We spoke truth to power and the powerful folded.</p>
<p><strong>Thanks to rallies</strong><br />
Organised by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/p/New-Zealanders-for-a-Democratic-Economy-61575143574407/">NZDE &#8211; New Zealanders for A Democratic Economy</a>, the protesters continue to protest against the attempted privatisation of assets including the port, and the erosion of democracy modelled by the <a href="https://www.cchl.co.nz/">Christchurch City Holdings Limited (CHCHL)</a>.</p>
<p>Fortunately some other journalists did manage to write up a report on the <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/regions/854772/unions-fear-lyttelton-port-privatisation-despite-rejection-of-unsolicited-bid">protest on Friday outside the CHCHL building</a>.</p>
<p>And thanks to <a href="https://muckrack.com/david-robie-4">Dr David Robie</a> who <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/07/30/saige-england-people-environment-win-dp-world-showdown-but-port-predator-fight-goes-on/">published my report about DP World for <em>Asia Pacific Report</em></a>:</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://www.facebook.com/josephine.varghese">Dr Josephine Varghese</a> who lectures in languages and political studies at the University of Canterbury, who rallies time and again for the people who are oppressed.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://www.facebook.com/claire.coveney.77">Claire Coveney</a> from Amnesty International, who rallies for the oppressed.</p>
<p>And thanks to Maritime Transport Union&#8217;s Lyttelton branch secretary <a href="https://www.facebook.com/markkram.nz">Mark Wilson</a> and Maritime Union Lyttelton branch secretary <a href="https://www.facebook.com/gerard.loader">Gerard Loader</a> who rally for the people.</p>
<p>I learned the lesson a long time ago that people need to join together for change. It&#8217;s a great catch cry and it is a cry that has been uttered over and again. As people rise up against wrong:</p>
<p><em>The people united will never be defeated.</em></p>
<p><strong>Boosting your spirits</strong><br />
So here are some SONGS to boost your spirits. (I will long remember seeing Palestinian men dancing when Destiny Church members challenged them with racist hatred. The Palestinian men danced against hate. Kicked up their legs and danced).</p>
<p>In similar spirit, here&#8217;s a clip when thousands of people of the &#8220;Sardines Movement&#8221; in Italy rose up against rightwing parties and sang <em>Bella Ciao</em>.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iDRiZouXOS8?si=KjwlYqAPdVzQdkxf" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Thousands of people sing Bella Ciao in Turin, Italy.   Video: Luca Dibattista<br />
</em></p>
<p>Breaking unions is a way to break the people. Here&#8217;s a clip of the old hit song (banned by the British government at the time) that rings true today (though I would add &#8220;woman&#8221; into the lyrics, because I&#8217;m a staunch union-supporting woman)</p>
<p>A big shout out to all healthcare workers &#8212; support the nurses!</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/dxNMgoiNLFs?si=H3yjXTaURv6jE_UN" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Strawbs &#8212; part of the union.                 Video: Top 40 1973<br />
</em></p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://www.facebook.com/sara.campbell.5477272">Sara Campbell</a> and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/marney.ainsworth">Marney Ainsworth</a> and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/john.minto.90">John Minto</a> and Keep Our Assets (Murray Horton) who rally for a fair deal for the people and the environment, and thanks to Harry Robson and other members of NZDE.</p>
<p>Thanks to all the people who protest against oppression and who stand with the oppressed. Free free Palestine!</p>
<p>Toitū Tiriti!</p>
<p>And thanks to all the journalists, here, there, and everywhere, who risk their livelihoods or their lives to report the truth.</p>
<p>Everyone who does something. Every reporter, every petitioner and protester and letter writer, every poet, every one who rallies for community with community, <em>we do see you!</em></p>
<p><span class="html-span xdj266r x14z9mp xat24cr x1lziwak xexx8yu xyri2b x18d9i69 x1c1uobl x1hl2dhg x16tdsg8 x1vvkbs x4k7w5x x1h91t0o x1h9r5lt x1jfb8zj xv2umb2 x1beo9mf xaigb6o x12ejxvf x3igimt xarpa2k xedcshv x1lytzrv x1t2pt76 x7ja8zs x1qrby5j"><span class="x193iq5w xeuugli x13faqbe x1vvkbs xlh3980 xvmahel x1n0sxbx x1lliihq x1s928wv xhkezso x1gmr53x x1cpjm7i x1fgarty x1943h6x xudqn12 x3x7a5m x6prxxf xvq8zen xo1l8bm xzsf02u" dir="auto"><em><a href="https://www.saige-england.com/">Saige England</a> is a humanitarian journalist and activist for community and the environment. She was present at the Lyttelton public meeting last week in support of community action. She is also a contributor to Asia Pacific Report.</em></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera abruptly terminates contracts of Palestinian journalists in Gaza in ongoing Israeli genocide</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/02/al-jazeera-abruptly-terminates-contracts-of-palestinian-journalists-in-gaza-in-ongoing-israeli-genocide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 10:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza media freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Killing of journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian Journalists Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Eva Karene Bartlett During the ongoing Israeli genocide of Gaza, Palestinian journalists have been courageously reporting under Israel’s bombs, drones and snipers. More than 260 journalists have been killed by Israel in Gaza since October 2023 alone. Reporting on Israeli bombardments and firing continues to be extremely dangerous for Palestinian journalists, who are completely ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong><em> By Eva Karene Bartlett</em></p>
<div><picture><source type="image/webp" /></picture></div>
<p>During the ongoing Israeli genocide of Gaza, Palestinian journalists have been courageously reporting under Israel’s bombs, drones and snipers. <a href="https://x.com/EuroMedHR/status/2081345518261686594%20">More than 260 journalists</a> have been killed by Israel in Gaza since October 2023 alone.</p>
<p>Reporting on Israeli bombardments and firing continues to be extremely dangerous for Palestinian journalists, who are completely cut off from the world.</p>
<p>It is at this point which media giant Al Jazeera reportedly abruptly ended the contracts of 24 journalists in Gaza it had employed, breaking earlier alleged promises of job security with the channel.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.un.org/en/peace-and-security/bearing-witness-breaking-barriers"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> The essential role of journalists in Gaza and the West Bank</a> &#8212; <em>UN</em></li>
<li><a href="https://pjs.ps/en/page-3556.html">60%–75% of surviving journalists in Gaza have lost their homes or been forcibly displaced</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+journalists">Other Gaza journalists reports</a></li>
</ul>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Al Jazeera in Gaza is dismissing some of the most important and prominent journalists who carried the responsibility of delivering the truth throughout the months of war, in a humiliating way that does not reflect the sacrifices they made.</p>
<p>These journalists stood on the front…</p>
<p>— Tamer Nahed (@Tamer_Alnoaizy) <a href="https://x.com/Tamer_Alnoaizy/status/2081285591656755235?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 26, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>According to reports <a href="https://x.com/Gaza24Live/status/2081055554084974686">from Gaza</a>, the journalists’ “<em>salaries were stopped and they were referred to a private company identified as “Media,” where they would be paid on a piecework basis without permanent contracts, insurance or clear employment protections.</em>”</p>
<p>This is after many of the terminated journalists had for years risked their lives reporting and filming Israel’s crimes against Palestinians in Gaza.</p>
<p>In fact, without their footage and reports, Al Jazeera could not have produced and financially gained from its own breaking reports.</p>
<p>One of these journalists is cameraman Mahmoud Shalha, who was the cameraman for well-known and beloved journalist Anas al-Sharif. Together, they courageously covered relentless Israeli bombardments in northern Gaza.</p>
<p><strong>Murdered journalists</strong><br />
Sharif <a href="https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-assassinates-entire-al-jazeera-crew-ahead-of-gaza-city-occupation">and five other journalists</a> were <a href="https://t.me/thecradlemedia/40814">murdered</a> when Israel attacked the Al Jazeera journalists’ tent at Shifa hospital on August 10, 2025.</p>
<p>Shalha was called away from the site by an uncle just a few hours before the Israeli airstrike, he <a href="https://x.com/Mahmoudshalh/status/2081440539946139929">said</a>, noting he had worked alongside Anas and the other journalists daily throughout the genocide.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="rtl" lang="ar">أهذا حقًّا ما كان ينتظرني؟</p>
<p>في أي لحظة، كان من الممكن أن أكون شهيدًا وأنا أنقل المشهد والصورة، وأحاول إيصال الحقيقة إلى العالم. لكنني اليوم أجد نفسي، بكل أسف، مفصولًا من قناة الجزيرة دون سابق إنذار.</p>
<p>أنا الناجي الوحيد من استهداف خيمة قناة الجزيرة عند بوابة مستشفى الشفاء، والذي…</p>
<p>— Mahmoud.b.shalha محمود شلحة (@Mahmoudshalh) <a href="https://x.com/Mahmoudshalh/status/2081054162997957042?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>He <a href="https://x.com/Mahmoudshalh/status/2081054162997957042">wrote</a> about his abrupt termination by Al Jazeera:</p>
<p>“<em>At any moment, I could have been a martyr while transporting the scene and the images, trying to convey the truth to the world. But today, I find myself, with all due regret, severed from Al Jazeera channel without any prior warning.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Since the beginning of the war, I worked as a cameraman with Al Jazeera’s martyred correspondent Anas al-Sharif, then with the two martyrs Anas al-Sharif and Muhammad Qurayqea after our colleague <a href="https://ingaza.wordpress.com/2024/11/03/a-massacre-within-a-massacre-israel-is-exterminating-palestinians-in-northern-gaza-and-killing-palestinian-journalists-reporting-on-it/">Fadi al-Wahidi</a> was injured, and I continued my work with the channel after their martyrdom, despite the risks and harsh conditions.</em>”</p>
<p>His post goes on to highlight that this work was his mission which he believed in, and was the sole source of income to support his family.</p>
<p><strong>&#8217;15 second call&#8217;</strong><br />
“<em>But a phone call that didn’t exceed fifteen seconds was enough to end it all. Al Jazeera’s management informed me of the termination of my employment, without explaining any reason, or giving prior notice, or paying my dues, and even without a single word of thanks</em>.”</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Al Jazeera exploited Palestinian journalists from Gaza, using their heroism and courage under Israeli fire—reporting during the worst of Israeli atrocities against Palestinian civilians and journalists and still reporting now—and now has abruptly ended the contracts of 24…</p>
<p>— Eva Karene Bartlett (@EvaKBartlett) <a href="https://x.com/EvaKBartlett/status/2081627582982680753?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 27, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate <a href="https://pjs.ps/en/page-3556.html">reported</a> at the end of June that 60 percent–75 percent of the surviving journalists in Gaza have lost their homes or have been forcibly displaced, reporting that, “<em>journalists in Gaza have been subjected to an unprecedented campaign targeting their lives, workplaces, and homes, in the context of a war that has sought not only to silence their voices but also to uproot the very environment in which journalism is practised.</em>”</p>
<p>Journalists in Gaza upload their work from tents or wherever of the sparse locations there is an internet connection. These are impossible conditions for most people, but Palestinian journalists deal with it in order to keep conveying their reality to an outside world that has seemingly lost interest after a so-called ceasefire in October 2025.</p>
<p><strong>NO CEASEFIRE, ISRAEL CONTINUES TO GENOCIDE GAZA</strong></p>
<p>The Cradle <a href="https://t.me/thecradlemedia/65066">reported</a> on July 27 that since the 11 October 2025 “ceasefire,” 1203 Palestinians have been killed, 3900 wounded. These murders are due to Israeli attacks which continue near-daily in Gaza, far from most news headlines now.</p>
<figure id="attachment_131447" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131447" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-131447" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Palestinian-journalists-PalS-680wide.png" alt="The Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate website." width="680" height="351" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Palestinian-journalists-PalS-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Palestinian-journalists-PalS-680wide-300x155.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131447" class="wp-caption-text">The <a href="https://pjs.ps/en/index.html">Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate website</a>.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate has <a href="https://pjs.ps/ar/page-3565.html">called on</a> Al Jazeera to reconsider the termination of the journalists and contracted staff working with Al Jazeera Mubasher (Live) in the Gaza Strip.</p>
<p>It said it had received a complaint from affected journalists and employees who objected to the termination of their contracts and their transfer to a private media company. “<em>Media organisations, regardless of their stature, have a professional and ethical responsibility to honour their commitments to employees and to handle contractual or administrative changes in a fair and transparent manner.</em>”</p>
<p><strong>Prominent journalists dismissed</strong><br />
As other Palestinians in Gaza <a href="https://x.com/Tamer_Alnoaizy/status/2081285591656755235">pointed out</a>, “<em>Al Jazeera in Gaza is dismissing some of the most important and prominent journalists who carried the responsibility of delivering the truth throughout the months of war, in a humiliating way that does not reflect the sacrifices they made.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;These journalists lived through every detail of the war, faced threats, had their photos placed on wanted lists, and were separated from their families and children out of fear of being targeted yet they chose to remain in the field and continue telling the truth, no matter the cost. These journalists do not deserve for years of courage and sacrifice to be reduced to this. They deserved recognition, loyalty, and respect not humiliation and an ending that ignores everything they gave</em>.”</p>
<p>On July 26, The non-profit Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor published a <a href="https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/7084/International-community-must-end-Israel%E2%80%99s-media-blackout-on-Gaza,-protect-journalists,-ensure-access-to-press-equipment">statement</a> calling for urgent international efforts, “<em>to lift the media blackout in the Gaza Strip, protect journalists, enable the immediate entry of independent international media, and ensure access to protective gear and press equipment, as journalists continue to be targeted for over 1000 days during the ongoing genocide in the enclave.</em>”</p>
<p>It notes that since October 2023 alone, “<em>more than 262 journalists have been killed in the Gaza Strip, with hundreds more injured or arrested, according to local and international press and human rights institutions, marking the highest toll recorded against media workers in any contemporary conflict</em>.”</p>
<p>I’ve shared any of reports of what Palestinian journalists put their lives on the line for &#8212; and indeed paid for with the lives &#8212; to share their reality of Palestinians being hunted and massacred in Israel’s still ongoing genocide of Gaza.</p>
<p>If Al Jazeera does not reverse its unjust decision, then it is grossly unjust on these courageous journalists whose footage and reporting Al Jazeera wouldn’t have had without them.</p>
<p><em>Eva Bartlett is a Canadian activist and freelance journalist who has lived in Gaza for three years. This article had no response from Al Jazeera.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Daily Blog: We have secretly been taken to court and I’m facing 6 months in prison: We can’t tell you who, how, why or what</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/02/the-daily-blog-we-have-secretly-been-taken-to-court-and-im-facing-6-months-in-prison-we-cant-tell-you-who-how-why-or-what/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 01:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal directives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martyn Bradbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: By The Daily Blog editor and publisher Martyn Bradbury Comrades. The Daily Blog is New Zealand&#8217;s largest leftwing blog; we have been around for 13 years. We’ve had many fights over the years. This one is perhaps the most alarming. WATCH: The Bradbury Group Breaking: Free Speech Issue TDB has been served legal directives ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><strong>EDITORIAL:</strong> <em>By The Daily Blog editor and publisher Martyn Bradbury</em></p>
<p>Comrades.</p>
<p><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/"><em>The Daily Blog</em></a> is New Zealand&#8217;s largest leftwing blog; we have been around for 13 years.</p>
<p>We’ve had many fights over the years.</p>
<p>This one is perhaps the most alarming.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@TheBradburyGroup"><strong>WATCH:</strong> The Bradbury Group</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/TheDailyBlogNZ/posts/breaking-free-speech-issue-the-daily-blog-has-secretly-been-taken-to-court-and-i/2719534643533915/">Breaking: Free Speech Issue</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_131419" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131419" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-131419 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Daily-Blog-logo-300wide.png" alt="" width="300" height="107" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131419" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/"><strong>THE DAILY BLOG</strong></a></figcaption></figure>
<p><em>TDB</em> has been served legal directives from the Star Chamber under pain of 6 months imprisonment or a $5000 fine to censor 4 blogs.</p>
<p>We can’t tell you who is doing this.</p>
<p>We can’t tell you why it’s being done.</p>
<p>We can’t tell you how it’s being done.</p>
<p>And we can’t tell you what has been censored.</p>
<p>I am facing Court action Tuesday this week and <a href="https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/MOJ01481.1-application-for-in-court-media-coverage-Apr18.pdf">I am calling on all mainstream media to apply to cover this</a>. A ruling allows media to cover this in the Court room.</p>
<p>When you find out who is doing this. Why they are doing this. How they are doing this, and what has been censored.</p>
<p>I am making it clear in court on Tuesday the following.</p>
<p><strong>1 – I beg the Court to immediately throw this terrible abuse of process out.</strong></p>
<p><strong>2 – I’m not going to apologise.</strong></p>
<p><strong>3 – I will not pay a fine.</strong></p>
<p><strong>4 – I want to immediately repost my 4 censored blogs.</strong></p>
<p><strong>5 – I want everyone involved in this to be made public, because Free Speech issues like this are definitely in the public interest</strong></p>
<p><strong>6 – I’m prepared to go to prison for Free Speech.</strong></p>
<p>Let’s see what happens on Tuesday.</p>
<p>Wish me luck Comrades.</p>
<p>In solidarity</p>
<p>The Revolution continues</p>
<p><em>PS – Look, If I do actually get arrested in Court on Tuesday, can someone set up a give-a-little account? I’m going to need money to pay my bills because I’ll be in prison!</em></p>
<p><em>PPS – <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@TheBradburyGroup">The Bradbury Group</a> is booked to go live 8pm on Tuesday – but IF I am in prison, Matthew Tukaki from Waatea will step in as host.</em></p>
<p><em>PPPS – If I go to prison, please can you do me a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shawshank_Redemption">Shawshank Redemption</a> and send so many books in that they shame the State for putting me in prison in the first place. </em></p>
<p><em>Republished from The Daily Blog with permission.</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
