<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Opinion &#8211; Asia Pacific Report</title>
	<atom:link href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/category/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz</link>
	<description>Independent Asia Pacific news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Rawiri shines at Kingmaker debate as Māori voters set to rock NZ government in election</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/15/rawiri-shines-at-kingmaker-debate-as-maori-voters-set-to-rock-nz-government-in-election/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 06:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ elections 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opportunity Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rawiri Waititi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Te Pati Māori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaty of Waitangi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVNZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waatea News Column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston Peters]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[WAATEA NEWS COLUMN: By Martyn Bradbury The Kingmakers debate on TVNZ last night was won by the two Queens, Chlöe Swarbrick (Greens) and Qiulae Wong (Opportunity), but I think Te Pāti Māori&#8217;s co-leader Rawiri Waititi landed a killer blow to Winston Peters (New Zealand First) that he won’t recover from. By throwing into Winston’s face ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WAATEA NEWS COLUMN:</strong> <em>By Martyn Bradbury</em></p>
<p>The Kingmakers debate on TVNZ last night was won by the two Queens, Chlöe Swarbrick (Greens) and Qiulae Wong (Opportunity), but I think Te Pāti Māori&#8217;s co-leader Rawiri Waititi landed a killer blow to Winston Peters (New Zealand First) that he won’t recover from.</p>
<p>By throwing into Winston’s face his infamous 1975 quote about Māori losing their land, culture and language and becoming &#8220;kahki&#8221; Europeans, Rawiri reminded the entire country that Winston has been around so long that he has become a political hypocrite.</p>
<p>That is devastating because very few would remember that quote and resets Winston more recent Treaty of Waitangi bashing with the radicalism of his youth.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=2026+NZ+election"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other NZ 2026 general election reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_134801" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134801" style="width: 150px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/15/vote-progressive-parties-if-you-seek-justice-for-palestine/"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-134801 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Vote-Palestine-150tall.png" alt="NZ ELECTIONS - VOTE PALESTINE" width="150" height="181" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134801" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/15/vote-progressive-parties-if-you-seek-justice-for-palestine/"><strong>NZ ELECTIONS &#8211; VOTE PALESTINE</strong></a></figcaption></figure>
<p>That moment alone allowed Rawiri to land a knock out punch while Winston spent the rest of the debate reeling.</p>
<p>It was New Zealand vs Old Zealand.</p>
<p>The TVNZ polling clearly shows Māori voters understanding the Te Pāti Māori candidate strategy and the rush to the Greens continues to back up that vote splitting strategy.</p>
<p>Māori strategic voters will decide the 2026 Election.</p>
<p><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/author/martyn-bradbury/"><em>Martyn Bradbury</em></a> <em>is publisher and editor of The Daily Blog. This article was first published by TDB and is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaza mass killing documentary a warning of global dystopian future</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/15/gaza-mass-killing-documentary-a-warning-of-global-dystopian-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 01:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Killing of civilians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lavender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass killings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAZA: A Window into Systems of Mass Killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Voice of Hind Rajab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Where's Daddy?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[REVIEW: By David Robie, editor of Asia Pacific Report I have watched the most disturbing film in my lifetime &#8212; a warning to the world of a horrendous dystopian future when human life and death is being decided by remote AI-assisted control warfare weapons. The problem is that this dystopian future is already with us ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>REVIEW:</strong><em> By David Robie, editor of Asia Pacific Report<br />
</em></p>
<p>I have watched the most disturbing film in my lifetime &#8212; a warning to the world of a horrendous dystopian future when human life and death is being decided by remote AI-assisted control warfare weapons. The problem is that this dystopian future is already with us now and has been unfolding for three years &#8212; with genocide in the Israeli besieged Palestinian enclave of Gaza.</p>
<p>Unlike the Venice film festival premiere last month when the audience gave an unprecedented 25-minute standing ovation for <em>The Guardian</em>-produced <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIBRLEEaueo"><em>NAZA: A Window into Systems of Mass Killing</em></a>, the New Zealand preview audience at Auckland’s Rialto Cinemas sat in shocked silence for minutes at the end, unsure how to respond to this harrowing documentary by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor. NAZA won the Venice Special Jury Prize.</p>
<p>So stunned was the Auckland audience that there was not a single clap.</p>
<p>This is a chilling visual testimony (surely likely evidence for future war crimes trials of Benjamin Netanyahu and others?) of what Australian journalist Antony Loewenstein wrote about in his landmark 2023 global book <em>The Palestine Laboratory</em>. At least 75,000 Palestinians have now been slaughtered (the real total is bound to be far, far higher) in the more than 1000 days since the genocide began &#8212; mostly women and children (some 25,000 of the latter).</p>
<p>And a Republican congressman, David Valadao, has just been <a href="https://gvwire.com/2026/10/09/valadao-and-villegas-couldnt-be-further-apart-the-stakes-for-ca-22-are-huge/">reported as gloating</a> about the US &#8220;benefits&#8221; of the war on Gaza in that weapons &#8220;are tested there; we are able to learn from that&#8221;. <em>“We”?</em> Sickening!</p>
<p>Ironically, the standing ovation in Venice eclipsed by a couple of minutes another Gaza film last year, Kaouther Ben Hania’s <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/venice-audience-left-tears-during-film-about-gaza-genocide-victim-hind-rajab"><em>The Voice of Hind Rajab</em></a>, a dramatised feature film about the cold-blooded murder of a five-year-old girl by an Israeli tank crew, who also ambushed and assassinated the two ambulance responders sent to rescue her.</p>
<p>The Hind Rajab film was heart-rending and tragic, whereas <em>NAZA</em> is so deeply disturbing because of the sheer callousness and remoteness of the killing carried out by 24 intelligence agents and soldiers at the push of a button through their AI applications known by Orwellian labels such as “Lavender”and “Where’s Daddy?” Yet to their credit, perhaps, they must have at least had tugs at their conscience to agree to being interviewed for this film (anonymous and with disguised voices) in secret to expose the industrial level killing.</p>
<p><strong>Acceptable kill ratios</strong><br />
One of the interviewees tells of approval to kill 500 civilians as acceptable to target one Hamas resistance fighter. Others spoke of 200 killings at a time for one target as “acceptable” – or even “expected”. The gloves of revenge were cruelly off.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-fGCTTCctNM?si=hRWNvyFeSpSO0lp3" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>The official Naza documentary trailer.                  Video: Madman Films</em></p>
<p>The location is eerie, even ghostly, as the narratives explore remote killings during the interviews on (presumably) Tel Aviv rooftops. In the background, are the lights from Israeli apartments as people go about their mundane lives &#8212; a far cry from the terror experienced by Gazan families as they are targeted, often during the night, by quadcopters, missiles or bombs &#8212; or “Whoops”, mini drones designed especially for attacking inside homes.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s so insanely fun. . . &#8221; &#8220;It&#8217;s like a video game . . . &#8221; &#8220;You understand that your goal is to destroy . . . &#8221; are some of the reflections of the death dealers under the cover of darkness. The “whistleblowers”, if we can call them that, spoke to co-director Abraham under the expectation of complete anonymity for fear of retribution from the system they were once — or possibly still are — embedded in.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134836" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134836" style="width: 400px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134836 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Rachel-Szor-Yuval-Abraham-WikiMedia-400tall.png" alt="Venice Special Jury Award winning directors Rachel Szor and Yuval Abraham . . . a dystopian documentary" width="400" height="544" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Rachel-Szor-Yuval-Abraham-WikiMedia-400tall.png 400w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Rachel-Szor-Yuval-Abraham-WikiMedia-400tall-221x300.png 221w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Rachel-Szor-Yuval-Abraham-WikiMedia-400tall-309x420.png 309w" sizes="(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134836" class="wp-caption-text">Venice Special Jury Award winning directors Rachel Szor and Yuval Abraham . . . a dystopian documentary. Image: WikiMedia</figcaption></figure>
<p>The film title <em>NAZA</em> is an acronym standing for the Hebrew term <em>Nezek Agavi</em>, which means &#8220;collateral damage&#8221;.</p>
<p>This documentary has provoked an immediate and savage response by the extreme rightwing Netanyahu regime. Responses began with <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/naza-beats-new-avengers-movie-top-box-office-italy">Culture Minister Miki Zohar calling the film &#8220;despicable&#8221;</a> and saying he would &#8220;act immediately to revoke the Israeli citizenship of these despicable creators on the grounds of treason against the state&#8221;.</p>
<p>Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu himself, who is wanted on an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, was the next to attack the filmmakers. He declared he would introduce two legislative bills targeting those who “defame” the Israeli military. According to him, the first bill would enable <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAZA_(film)">revoking the citizenship</a> of “anyone who defames soldiers”. The second would boost “twentyfold” the amount in damages in lawsuits for defamation.</p>
<p>The military itself has also threatened action. Chief-of-staff Eyal Zamir ordered punitive legal steps against the filmmakers with the help of the internal intelligence agency Shin Bet.</p>
<p><strong>Punishing the filmmakers</strong><br />
The documentary is not an outlier in the allegations it makes, and it is revealing that the Israeli establishment should seek to punish the filmmakers rather than examine the abhorrent rules of engagement that have blighted this war on Gaza (in response to the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 – a “breakout” from their 23-year prison enclave).</p>
<p>Just this week, the German news magazine <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/my-unit-killed-many-unarmed-men-israeli-soldiers-recount-gaza-war-crimes"><em>Der Siegel</em> has published accounts</a> from 10 Israeli soldiers describing how troops killed Palestinian civilians in Gaza and branded them as “terrorists”. The soldiers recounted war crimes in their testimonies, including slaughtering unarmed Palestinians and destroying entire neighbourhoods to prevent families returning. One infantry reservist described how he was encouraged to kill unarmed civilians, saying: “The Arabs must be punished.” Collective punishment is a war crime.</p>
<p>The Israeli authorities are so desperate to minimise the political damage from this documentary that a hurriedly produced “counter” film as part of the <a href="https://quincyinst.org/research/the-eighth-front-inside-israels-1-billion-influence-campaign/">$1 billion <em>hasbara</em> propaganda programme</a> has been released &#8212; but this is littered with lies and disinformation and is unlikely to have the desired impact.</p>
<p>For an accurate exposé of the Gaza breakout itself that triggered the genocide following more than seven decades of occupation and repression since 750,000 Palestinians were expelled from their own land during the 1948 Nakba (&#8220;the Catastrophe&#8221;), it is hard to match the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0atzea-mPY">Al Jazeera investigation </a><em>October 7.</em></p>
<p>• <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIBRLEEaueo"><em>NAZA: A Window into Systems of Mass Killing</em></a>, directed by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor (Madman Entertainment). The film has been released in 55 countries, <a href="https://www.flicks.co.nz/movie/naza/">including New Zealand</a>, but is banned from screening in Israel. It will be streamed for free on <em>The Guardian’s</em> website in late November.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134837" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134837" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134837" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NAZA-still-3-what-is-NAZA-680wide.png" alt="The ghostly Tel Aviv rooftops a far cry from the terror experienced by Gazan families as they are targeted, often during the night, by quadcopters" width="680" height="595" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NAZA-still-3-what-is-NAZA-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NAZA-still-3-what-is-NAZA-680wide-300x263.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NAZA-still-3-what-is-NAZA-680wide-480x420.png 480w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134837" class="wp-caption-text">The ghostly Tel Aviv rooftops a far cry from the terror experienced by Gazan families as they are targeted, often during the night, by quadcopters, missiles or bombs — or “Whoops”, mini drones designed especially for attacking inside homes. Image: Madman Films</figcaption></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vote progressive parties &#8211; if you seek justice for Palestine</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/15/vote-progressive-parties-if-you-seek-justice-for-palestine/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 22:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Scorecard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opportunity Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions on Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Te Pati Māori]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Justice for Palestine Vote for the three progressive parties &#8212; Labour, Green and Te Pāti Māori &#8212; in next month&#8217;s general election if you want to see a principled Aotearoa New Zealand foreign policy stance based on international law and justice. Here is how Aotearoa New Zealand’s political parties stand on the Palestinian solidarity movement’s ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/just4pal"><em>Justice for Palestine</em></a></p>
<p>Vote for the three progressive parties &#8212; Labour, Green and Te Pāti Māori &#8212; in next month&#8217;s general election if you want to see a principled Aotearoa New Zealand foreign policy stance based on international law and justice.</p>
<p>Here is how Aotearoa New Zealand’s political parties stand on the Palestinian solidarity movement’s four key demands this election:</p>
<p>This year’s election provides the movement a crucial opportunity to educate and encourage the public to elect representatives who will take a stand for justice and be accountable to us, the people.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Free+Palestine+Party"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Palestine Party reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_134789" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134789" style="width: 640px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134789" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Election-Scorecard-PP-640tall.png" alt="Comparison table of the New Zealand political parties on the issue of Palestine" width="640" height="801" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Election-Scorecard-PP-640tall.png 640w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Election-Scorecard-PP-640tall-240x300.png 240w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Election-Scorecard-PP-640tall-336x420.png 336w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134789" class="wp-caption-text">Comparison table of the New Zealand political parties on the issue of Palestine. Image:</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Rating footnotes:<br />
</strong>However, Opportunity wants any goods and services produced inside the Zionist state to be “unaffected” by sanctions.</p>
<p>Te Pāti Māori, the Greens and Labour have committed to comprehensive sanctions, using a framework based on the Russia Sanctions Act.</p>
<p>The language of this Bill would offer the solidarity movement the possibility to organise together for wider-ranging sanctions (eg. targeting complicit states and international financial backers of the genocide and occupation).</p>
<p>While Te Pāti Māori has had the clearest and strongest position on Palestine and related issues throughout the past 3 years, their campaign is calling for electorate votes only.</p>
<p>Te Pāti Māori is encouraging voters to cast their party vote for the Greens or Labour.</p>
<p>The Opportunity Party’s commitment to sanctions targets goods produced in illegal settlements and travel bans on individuals. Opportunity would consider divesting public money if it fit UN criteria of supporting the illegal occupation.</p>
<p><em>This scorecard is endorsed by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/just4pal">Justice for Palestine</a>, <a href="https://www.psna.nz/">Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA)</a> and Dayenu.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran never made the West abandon its own principles. Israel did.</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/14/iran-never-made-the-west-abandon-its-own-principles-israel-did/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-apartheid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language of rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normative power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Israel lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racial domination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student arrests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Human Rights Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNESCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Reza Nasri Western civilisation has never had a clean record. Its history is soaked in conquest, enslavement, and slaughter. Yet it always took solace in one redeeming quality: it carried within itself the seeds of its own correction. Its unwavering support for Israel has betrayed the values and squandered the achievements cultivated over ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Reza Nasri</em></p>
<p>Western civilisation has never had a clean record. Its history is soaked in conquest, enslavement, and slaughter. Yet it always took solace in one redeeming quality: it carried within itself the seeds of its own correction.</p>
<p>Its unwavering support for Israel has betrayed the values and squandered the achievements cultivated over centuries of philosophical inquiry and moral struggle. But more importantly, it has dismantled the very mechanism of self-correction that once enabled it to confront and overcome its own wrongs.</p>
<p>The West&#8217;s defenders often argue that, yes, it lived under some of history&#8217;s most brutal monarchies, but it gave the world constitutional democracy. It enslaved Africans on an industrial scale, they concede, yet abolished slavery and helped draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/10/13/the-escalation-in-yemen-is-a-turning-point"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> The escalation in Yemen is a turning point</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine+Gaza">Other Gaza reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>It colonised continents, but came to recognise the right of peoples to self-determination. It waged two world wars, yet drafted the UN Charter and outlawed aggression. It perpetrated the Holocaust, yet helped establish the Genocide Convention. It committed unspeakable crimes, yet helped build the architecture of accountability, from Nuremberg and the Geneva Conventions to the International Criminal Court. It dropped atomic bombs on Japanese cities and gassed soldiers in the trenches of Ypres, yet helped forge the Non-Proliferation Treaty and the ban on chemical weapons.</p>
<p>This capacity for self-correction gave the West a normative power that served it for decades. It allowed Western capitals to speak the language of rules and rights, and to be heard even by those who remembered suffering at Western hands.</p>
<p>Its unconditional support for Israel has squandered that capital. Worse, it has turned the West against the very mechanisms that once allowed it to redress its mistakes. This did not begin in Gaza. It has been under way for half a century.</p>
<p>Democracy was the first casualty. When Vietnam War opponent Senator Charles Percy lost his seat in 1984, the head of America&#8217;s leading pro-Israel lobby publicly boasted that politicians everywhere had taken note.</p>
<p><strong>Free speech policed for foreign power</strong><br />
Four decades later, a single pro-Israel super PAC spent more than $20 million to unseat two members of Congress in one election cycle. Governments across the West have adopted definitions of antisemitism that blur into criticism of Israel. Students are arrested for protesting, foreign scholars face deportation for their op-eds, and in Britain hundreds have been detained for holding placards. Free speech is being policed on behalf of a foreign regime.</p>
<p>The legacy of abolition has been betrayed. The West that ended slavery and ultimately turned against apartheid South Africa has made peace with racial domination.</p>
<p>Through the 1970s and 1980s, as the world isolated Pretoria, Israel was among its most important military partners. Today the very instrument that helped bring down South African apartheid, the boycott, is penalised in dozens of American states and condemned by Germany&#8217;s Parliament when aimed at Israel. This comes even as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Israel&#8217;s own B&#8217;Tselem conclude that Israel practices apartheid.</p>
<p>The promise of decolonisation has been inverted. The West that eventually conceded independence across Asia and Africa has, since 1967, armed and shielded an occupation it formally considered illegal. It shrugged off the International Court of Justice&#8217;s 2004 ruling against the separation wall and watched settlements expand in defiance of Security Council Resolution 2334. When the Court declared the entire occupation unlawful in 2024, Western capitals answered with more weapons.</p>
<p>The UN Charter has been hollowed out. The principle that territory cannot be acquired by war, enshrined in Resolution 242 and drafted by Britain, was abandoned when Washington recognised Israeli sovereignty over the occupied Golan Heights. The United States has vetoed roughly 50 Security Council resolutions to shield Israel since 1972, about half of all the vetoes it has ever cast.</p>
<p>It has paralysed the Council as occupation hardened, ethnic cleansing continued and tens of thousands were killed. It has walked out of UNESCO and the Human Rights Council over their treatment of Israel and defunded UNRWA, the lifeline of Palestinian refugees.</p>
<p>The Genocide Convention has been emptied. In 1982, the General Assembly declared the Sabra and Shatila massacre an act of genocide. The massacre was carried out in camps ringed by Israeli troops, and the major Western powers abstained. Four decades later, the ICJ ordered Israel to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza, and a UN commission of inquiry has since concluded that Israel committed genocide. Western weapons kept flowing. Germany, of all nations, found itself defending its arms exports before the Court.</p>
<p><strong>International justice gutted</strong><br />
International criminal justice has been gutted at every level. When Belgian courts pursued Ariel Sharon over Sabra and Shatila, Belgium rewrote its universal jurisdiction law under Israeli and American pressure. When a London court issued an arrest warrant for Tzipi Livni, Britain changed its law so it could not happen again.</p>
<p>In 2020, Washington sanctioned the ICC prosecutor for investigating Americans and Israelis. In 2025, after her successor sought Netanyahu&#8217;s arrest, it sanctioned him, the Court&#8217;s judges and even a UN special rapporteur. European governments that once championed the Court found reasons not to enforce its warrant.</p>
<p>And the non-proliferation regime is collapsing. Since 1969, Washington has tacitly accepted Israel&#8217;s undeclared arsenal behind a doctrine of &#8220;deliberate ambiguity&#8221;. Israel remains outside the NPT and the Biological Weapons Convention and has never ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention.</p>
<p>Western states have repeatedly obstructed a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction, the very bargain that secured the NPT&#8217;s indefinite extension in 1995. Meanwhile, they demand total transparency from Iran, an NPT member under IAEA inspection.</p>
<p>In 1981, even Washington voted to condemn Israel&#8217;s strike on Iraq&#8217;s safeguarded Osirak reactor. In 2025, when safeguarded Iranian facilities were bombed, Germany&#8217;s Chancellor praised Israel for doing the &#8220;dirty work&#8221; for all of us. The lesson to every capital is that joining the treaty buys no protection, and staying out of it costs nothing.</p>
<p>Netanyahu likes to portray Israel as the defender of Western civilisation against Iran. The truth is the opposite. Iran never made the West abandon its own principles. Israel did. No adversary has damaged Western civilisation as profoundly as the ally that persuaded it to dismantle its own conscience.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://x.com/RezaNasri1/">Rez Nasri</a> is an international lawyer, foreign policy analyst, and he writes about Iran in Persian, English and French.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay praised, pilloried, ignored by Australia</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/13/nobel-peace-prize-winner-pillay-praised-pilloried-ignored-by-australia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[María Corina Machado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navi Pillay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay has received worldwide praise amid derision from Israel and the US, while the Australian and New Zealand governments remain silent. Michael West Media reports. COMMENTARY: By Professor Stuart Rees The Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize committee awarded this year’s prize to Navi Pillay for her lifelong commitment to human rights, ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay has received worldwide praise amid derision from Israel and the US, while the Australian and New Zealand governments remain silent. </em><em><strong>Michael West Media</strong> reports.</em><br />
<strong><br />
COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Professor Stuart Rees</em></p>
<p>The Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize committee awarded this year’s prize to Navi Pillay for her lifelong commitment to human rights, justice and accountability.</p>
<p>Following a long and distinguished career as a human rights-focused jurist, South African-born Pillay was appointed chair of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory in 2021.</p>
<p>Quite predictably, within hours of the announcement of her award, President Trump said he should have won eight &#8220;Noble&#8221; (sic) prizes, that the decision was an indelible stain on Norway, and he would impose fresh sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) established to prosecute individuals accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.amnesty.org.au/nobel-peace-prize-honours-navi-pillay/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Nobel Peace Prize honours Navi Pillay for lifelong commitment to human rights, justice and accountability</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/10/a-triumph-for-global-justice-why-navi-pillays-nobel-peace-prize-is-beyond-reproach/">A triumph for global justice – why Navi Pillay’s Nobel Peace Prize is beyond reproach</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Happy to do his master’s bidding, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US would punish the choice of Pillay by &#8220;dismantling the ICC brick by brick, … we will ban transactions with this rogue court, cutting off their resources and crippling its ability to operate&#8221;.</p>
<p>In lockstep with his US patron, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu declared the choice of Pillay &#8220;a gross weaponisation of the Nobel Peace Prize…  If there was an award for lies, hatred and blood libel, Navi Pillay wouldn’t just be a contender, she’d be a front runner&#8221;.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Australian government has said nothing. Despite repeated claims to respect international law, a fearful silence is the best Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong can offer, a tactic suggesting a</p>
<blockquote><p>cowardly sheltering behind the diatribes from Trump and Netanyahu.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>A champion of human rights</strong><br />
In complete contrast to the Netanyahu criminality invective, Judge Pillay has promoted universal human rights, advocated respect for humanitarian law and, through her kindness and generosity, has represented the ideals of a common humanity.</p>
<p>Citations explaining Navi Pillay’s record explain why she is regarded as a champion of peace with justice and why so much is at stake in this controversy over her Nobel Prize.</p>
<p>The Nobel Committee explained their choice: &#8220;For her efforts to promote peace and international law.&#8221; … &#8220;History has shown that a world operating without the rule of law is unjust, unwise, and inhumane.&#8221;</p>
<p>A year earlier, Navi Pillay received the Sydney Peace Prize whose citation included reference to &#8220;a lifetime of advocating for the fundamental human rights of women&#8221;, due recognition of Judge Pillay’s campaigns to abolish female genital mutilation and forced child marriages.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134753" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134753" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134753" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Trump-Netanyahu-and-Wong-MWM-680wide.png" alt="US President Donald Trump" width="680" height="382" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Trump-Netanyahu-and-Wong-MWM-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Trump-Netanyahu-and-Wong-MWM-680wide-300x169.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134753" class="wp-caption-text">US President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong . . . reactions to the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay. Image: Michael West Media</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Where is the gratitude?<br />
</strong>Navi’s lifetime work has included a period as a judge on the ICC, president of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and chair of the UN Commission inquiring into war crimes in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.</p>
<p>Ever since her appointment as the first coloured, female judge to be appointed to the South African High Court, Navi Pillay has spoken and acted courageously.</p>
<blockquote><p>Such a virtue has prompted ire from Israel and silence from Australia.</p></blockquote>
<p>In her report to the UN, Judge Pillay concluded, &#8220;The State of Israel bears responsibility for the failure to prevent genocide, the commission of genocide and the failure to punish genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Reference to Australian human rights abuses<br />
</strong>Judge Pillay has also condemned Australia’s mandatory detention policy, repeatedly criticised offshore processing arrangements and the Northern Territory’s &#8220;imperialist, discriminatory attitude towards Indigenous communities&#8221;.</p>
<p>To tolerate criticism and still manage to act generously usually requires a touch of courage. In which case Prime Minister Albanese and Foreign Minister Wong still have a chance to congratulate Navi Pillay, if only because they regard themselves as champions of international humanitarian law.</p>
<p>Penny Wong’s silence is particularly notable, given <a href="https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/us-seizes-sixth-venezuela-linked-tanker-ahead-of-trump-meeting-with-opposition-leader/uce1np4d7" rel="noopener">her support</a> for Venezuelan 2025 Peace Prize winner María Corina Machado, who handed her prize to Donald Trump.</p>
<p>An Australian government statement of support for the UN, for the Nobel Committee and for Navi Pillay’s humanity-saving achievements would still be invaluable.</p>
<p>But support for the Nobel choice of Navi Pillay cannot be expressed by silence.</p>
<div data-profile-layout="layout-1" data-author-ref="user-2457" data-box-layout="slim" data-box-position="below" data-multiauthor="false" data-author-id="2457" data-author-type="user" data-author-archived="">
<div>
<p><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/stuart-rees/"> Professor Stuart Rees</a> AM is professor emeritus, University of Sydney and recipient of the Jerusalem (Al Quds) Peace Prize. Republished with permission from Michael West Media.</em></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is happening to Palestine is the tip of the spear of so much that is wrong with our world</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/12/what-is-happening-to-palestine-is-the-tip-of-the-spear-of-so-much-that-is-wrong-with-our-world/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 05:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dystopian society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erasure of families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fighting for freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International law violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace and justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace and security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youssef Sammour]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Youssef Sammour Millions of people asking the same question: How is this still happening? For three years, we have watched the destruction of Gaza. Homes, hospitals, schools and churches. Entire families erased. Children killed, maimed, orphaned and left to starve. Premature babies intentionally left to die in their incubators. The videos. The images. ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Youssef Sammour</em></p>
<p>Millions of people asking the same question: How is this still happening?</p>
<p>For three years, we have watched the destruction of Gaza. Homes, hospitals, schools and churches. Entire families erased. Children killed, maimed, orphaned and left to starve. Premature babies intentionally left to die in their incubators.</p>
<p>The videos. The images. The screams.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/10/aotearoa-marches-vigils-kick-off-global-day-of-action-for-palestine-with-mass-protests-in-dozens-of-countries/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Aotearoa marches, vigils kick-off ‘global day of action’ for Palestine with mass protests in dozens of countries</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine">Other Palestine reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>What we have witnessed is worse than any horror film I’ve ever seen &#8212; and these are real people. Our people.</p>
<p>And our history did not begin on October 7th.</p>
<p>For 78 years, Palestinians have been fighting for their freedom, dignity and the right to live in our own land.</p>
<p>What is happening to Palestine is the tip of the spear of so much that is wrong with our world: hypocrisy, double standards, selective accountability, and political agendas placed above human lives.</p>
<p>And it has spread to Sudan, Yemen, Congo, Haiti, Lebanon, Syria, Iran.</p>
<p><strong>Dystopian world</strong><br />
We live in a dystopian world. A world where the Epstein class get away with pedophilia and human trafficking and worse, while those speaking up against the murder of children are deemed problematic and extremists.</p>
<p>A world where wealth buys access, power buys protection, and accountability depends on who you are.</p>
<p>And that is why we are so frustrated.</p>
<p>We have presented the evidence. We have marched. We have petitioned. We have appealed to our governments and international institutions.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134713" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134713" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134713" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Global-March-Youssef-Sammour-680wide-1.png" alt="The author, Youssef Sammour, with drum during the Global March for Palestine" width="680" height="482" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Global-March-Youssef-Sammour-680wide-1.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Global-March-Youssef-Sammour-680wide-1-300x213.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Global-March-Youssef-Sammour-680wide-1-100x70.png 100w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Global-March-Youssef-Sammour-680wide-1-593x420.png 593w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134713" class="wp-caption-text">The author, Youssef Sammour, with drum during the Global March for Palestine last Saturday . . . &#8220;Still, it goes on. What more do our leaders need? How many more reports? How many more testimonies? How many more children?&#8221; Image: David Robie/Asia Pacific Report</figcaption></figure>
<p>The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICC_arrest_warrants_for_Israeli_leaders">International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants</a> for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant.</p>
<p>A <a href="https://www.un.org/unispal/document/report-of-coi-14aug25/">UN commission concluded that Israel had committed genocide</a>, and later reported the <a href="https://www.un.org/unispal/document/coi-report-23jun26/">deliberate targeting of Palestinian children</a>.</p>
<p>Journalists have documented it. Doctors have testified. Palestinians have shown the world their own suffering, day after day.</p>
<p>And still, it goes on.</p>
<p><strong>Biggest atrocity of our time</strong><br />
What more do our leaders need? How many more reports? How many more testimonies? How many more children?</p>
<p>Governments lecture us about human rights, international law and so-called “Western values” &#8212; then turn a blind eye to the biggest atrocity of our time.</p>
<p>Netanyahu addressed the UN General Assembly in New York last month despite an ICC arrest warrant.</p>
<p>And in the West Bank, Palestinians have faced killings, displacement and the destruction of their communities.</p>
<p>We are exhausted by the distance between what our leaders say and what they are prepared to do.</p>
<p>We are done with statements of concern without consequences. Of accountability that reaches the powerless but stops at the powerful.</p>
<p>Palestinian lives cannot remain the price of somebody else’s profit.</p>
<p><strong>Independent access denied</strong><br />
Now, one year into a <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/9/gaza-ceasefire-exists-in-name-only-more-than-100-ngos-say">so-called “ceasefire”</a>, Israel continues to deny international journalists independent access to Gaza, while Palestinian journalists continue to risk their lives to show us what is happening.</p>
<p>Palestinian voices suppressed online. Artists face consequences for speaking out. Prominent figures pressured into silence.</p>
<p>Yet our stories continue to reach people.</p>
<p>They have killed our journalists, but they have not buried the truth.</p>
<p>And despite every effort to silence us, look around you. Across the world, people are listening, organising and marching beside us.</p>
<p>They cannot make the world unsee what it has seen.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Demonstrators gathered at Parliament Lawn in Wellington, New Zealand, on Saturday for the Hikoi for Palestine / Global March for Palestine, marching to Te Ngakau Civic Square. https://t.co/5iOylRtBqv</p>
<p>— Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) <a href="https://x.com/MiddleEastEye/status/2109321706481283517?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>There is no going back. But awareness alone will not free Palestine.</p>
<p><strong>We hold them accountable</strong><br />
Now we hold them accountable. Our politicians. Our representatives. Our leaders.</p>
<p>They talk about “fixing the basics”, but where is their action against the deliberate killing of children?</p>
<p>Start with the basics of humanity. From this October until the next, we escalate our peaceful pressure.</p>
<p>We demand sanctions. We boycott Israeli products. We demand the expulsion of Israel’s ambassador and the cutting of political and economic ties with Israel. We demand visa restrictions on those responsible for atrocities.</p>
<p>We are done asking for accountability. We demand it as our right. We demand commitments, deadlines and action.</p>
<p><strong>Hardest year in life</strong><br />
On a personal note, this year has been without a doubt the hardest year of my life. This year we lost Roger Fowler to cancer, one of our most just leaders and advocates for humanity in here in Aotearoa.</p>
<p>During the last moments I had with him, he was still pushing for us to continue the fight for people in Palestine.</p>
<p>My father, who was born in the Nakba on May 15, 1948, is currently continuing his 2 year battle with cancer, leaving me with the ever-growing pressure to uproot my life here and move to Australia to be with him and my mother, both of whom can only be described as angels on earth and I count my blessings everyday that I was lucky enough to have them as my parents.</p>
<p>This year we also lost my grandmother Elena at the age of 96. One of the last things she told me was how much she wished she could go back to her home in Palestine. The place where she played with her friends, where she grew up, where she got married.</p>
<p>We should not have had to wait 78 years. We cannot let another generation inherit this same abandonment.</p>
<p>This year I also witnessed and experienced a cancer of a different kind, a cancer within our movement both locally and internationally. Where bullying, personal agendas and censorship were allowed to thrive while our shared values of transparency equality and fair treatment were cast aside.</p>
<p>How can we push and demand accountability externally when we cannot practise that internally? I understand it&#8217;s because we are all frustrated, but there&#8217;s no room for that here.</p>
<p><strong>Collective power</strong><br />
Let us turn our collective frustration into collective power. Stand up against bullying against personal agendas and saviour mentalities. We’re all in this together, and silence is the ultimate killer.</p>
<p>I do not want to live in a world where a child’s life is negotiable. And I know I am not alone.</p>
<p>We are the closest we&#8217;ve ever been to a better world. Even if it doesn&#8217;t feel like it.</p>
<p>Let us take our world back &#8212; and make it a world where every child can live in freedom and safety.</p>
<p>Free Palestine.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/sammouryoussef"><em>Youssef Sammour</em></a> <em>is a Palestinian Christian and a construction project manager who has been on board three Gaza Freedom Flotilla humanitarian aid missions for the besieged Palestinian enclave. This article is adapted from a speech he made at the Global March for Palestine last Saturday and is republished with permission.</em></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">THE LARGEST GLOBAL MOVEMENT IN THE WORLD…<br />
Today marks the 37th national pro-Palestinian protest in London, joining more than 250 demonstrations across 60 countries worldwide.</p>
<p>UNPRECEDENTED.<br />
Over the past three years, at least 51,000 pro-Palestinian protests have been documented across the world.</p>
<p>— Earth Hippy <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f30e.png" alt="🌎" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f54a.png" alt="🕊" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f49a.png" alt="💚" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> (@hippyygoat) <a href="https://x.com/hippyygoat/status/2108892384448610524?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 10, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A reminder of what is possible in community empowerment – ‘survival pending revolution’</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/11/a-reminder-of-what-is-possible-in-community-empowerment-survival-pending-revolution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 10:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counter culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jumping Sundays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice and peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponsonby People's Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock concerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock'n'roll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Fowler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South African apartheid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We Are All Palestinians]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This book launch speech was delivered today for Ponsonby People’s Union: At the Frontline of Community Activism in the 1970s, by Roger Fowler, whānau and fellow activists, at the Whare Wānanga, Tāmaki Pātaka Kōrero &#8212; Auckland Central Library. COMMENTARY: By Nick Bollinger I have to confess to a degree of imposter syndrome. I was the ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This book launch speech was delivered today for </em>Ponsonby People’s Union: At the Frontline of Community Activism in the 1970s<em>, by <strong>Roger Fowler</strong>, whānau and fellow activists, at the Whare Wānanga, Tāmaki Pātaka Kōrero &#8212; Auckland Central Library.<br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Nick Bollinger</em></p>
<p>I have to confess to a degree of imposter syndrome.</p>
<p>I was the wrong age and in the wrong place to be any part of this visionary organisation.</p>
<p>When the small group first gathered in the 1970s to plan what would be the foundations of the Ponsonby People’s Union (PPU), I would have been 12 or 13 and just starting secondary school at Onslow College in Johnsonville, near Wellington.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/29/from-resistance-to-the-ponsonby-peoples-union-a-courageous-tale-of-struggle-for-justice/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> From Resistance to the Ponsonby People’s Union, a courageous tale of struggle for justice</a> &#8212; <em>David Robie</em></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2022/10/14/honouring-the-peoples-fight-against-hardship-repression-and-racism/">Honouring the people’s fight against hardship, repression and racism</a> &#8212; <em>Tony Fala</em></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Ponsonby+People%27s+Union">Other Ponsonby People&#8217;s Union reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But even then, it would have been hard not to notice that there were things going on, out in the world beyond our school walls, that were challenging the way society was being run; that sought fairness and justice and peace.</p>
<p>For the past five or six years New Zealand had been involved in a war, waged by America against the Vietnamese, and it didn’t take much to see that this was completely wrong. There were marches through town on Friday nights, organised by people just a few years older than me; some who our government were trying to force into military training, perhaps even to fight in this unjust war.</p>
<p>And these were some of the first activities that me and my Onslow friends would join in on, that could be seen as part of the challenge to the powers that governed our society.</p>
<p>There were other things happening too that I wanted to be part of. Some were deadly serious, like the movement against nuclear weapons or apartheid in South Africa. And there were others that just looked like more fun than the mainstream version of life in New Zealand that was being offered – rock concerts and festivals, communes, sex, drugs and rock’n’roll.</p>
<p><strong>Hope, ideas, action</strong><br />
It was a time of hope, ideas, and action.</p>
<p>It felt, however loosely, like a movement.</p>
<p>It looked to me like an attempt to change the world.</p>
<p>And in many ways I think it did.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134670" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134670" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134670" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Roger-whanau-preparing-for-a-song-APR-680wide-.png" alt="The Roger Fowler whānau singers prepare to share a song" width="680" height="294" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Roger-whanau-preparing-for-a-song-APR-680wide-.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Roger-whanau-preparing-for-a-song-APR-680wide--300x130.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134670" class="wp-caption-text">The Roger Fowler whānau singers prepare to share a song at the book launch. Image: Asia Pacific Report</figcaption></figure>
<p>Sometimes that things that changed would change back again, as the forces of the establishment regrouped. Some things may have had destructive side-effects that no one really questioned enough at the time.</p>
<p>But there were also lives that were meaningfully improved, perhaps even saved, because of the ideals and the efforts of people who, in different ways, made up this movement.</p>
<p>It would take me a good few decades to get around to it, but a few years ago I set out to write a history of all of this, which I loosely termed the counterculture (because that is how other historians around the world had defined it &#8212; and versions of this movement did take place all over the world.)</p>
<figure id="attachment_134671" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134671" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134671" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Desmond-Abraham-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide.png" alt="Community activist Desmond Abrahams reflects " width="680" height="521" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Desmond-Abraham-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Desmond-Abraham-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide-300x230.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Desmond-Abraham-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide-80x60.png 80w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Desmond-Abraham-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide-548x420.png 548w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134671" class="wp-caption-text">Community activist Desmond Abrahams reflects on the South African antiapartheid struggle and racism in Aotearoa New Zealand. Image: Asia Pacific Report</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Just too young</strong><br />
As I had been just too young to really be more than an observer, I wanted to fill in some gaps in my experience. I wanted to know more about the people who had driven the movement in this country, where their ideas had come from, how they had developed them and put them into action and, ultimately, what had happened as a result.</p>
<p>I began interviewing people who had been involved – whether it had been in the protest activities, or the early bookshops, or the music festivals.</p>
<p>And I would always ask these people who they thought I should talk to; who else had been involved and might have valuable stories to share?</p>
<p>A name that would come up with amazing frequency was that of Roger Fowler.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134210" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134210" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134210 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ponsonby-Peoples-Union-cover-300tall.jpg" alt="Ponsonby People's Union cover" width="300" height="385" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ponsonby-Peoples-Union-cover-300tall.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ponsonby-Peoples-Union-cover-300tall-234x300.jpg 234w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134210" class="wp-caption-text">Ponsonby People&#8217;s Union book cover &#8211; designed by Kahu Fowler.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Now as I’ve said in the introduction to this book, Roger would no doubt have been embarrassed to find his name in the first sentence because – as I discovered when I met him – his ethos was always one of co-operation, the power of people working together to achieve a common goal rather that the celebration of the individual.</p>
<p>As I worked on my project I began to see that sometimes a shared energy and sense of purpose can help unite a group of likeminded people who might not otherwise have found a focus for their own energies.</p>
<p>And I’m sure that for many people that is what Roger provided, and that was one of his great gifts.</p>
<p>Roger was involved in many, many causes and projects, both before and after the PPU, but it’s the PPU that we’re celebrating here today and it is a great example of something he achieved and how it was achieved.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fdavid.robie.3%2Fposts%2Fpfbid0fyjfYCFCGRBqYT28WJiQXfMSEYhkZijjhHnSzSaYpGkgBR1pXEAGmhMtCq1ofygrl&amp;show_text=true&amp;width=500" width="500" height="761" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Jumping Sundays</strong><br />
When I completed my book about the counterculture in Aotearoa, I named it after something else Roger was involved with, something perhaps more frivolous but which seemed to me to be a symbol of those times: I called it <em>Jumping Sundays</em>, which was the name by which people referred to the Sunday afternoon people’s festivals that took place in Albert Park, and where Roger would often perform with his band, the Frank E. Evans Memorial Lunchtime Entertainment Band.</p>
<p>In Jumping Sundays, I attempted, perhaps over-ambitiously, to look at all the aspects of this movement and show some of the connections and even contradictions between its different facets. So there’s a chapter on the Vietnam War but also one on communes; a chapter about alternative media – the underground newspapers and the Resistance Bookshop (something else Roger was involved with) – but there are also chapters on drugs and sex and rock’n’roll.</p>
<p>To fit it all in, I had to compress an awful lot of information. I believe that in the index to <em>Jumping Sundays</em> there are four entries for the People’s Union, but really it adds up to just a couple of pages in which I couldn’t do much more than outline how this organisation came about, who was involved and a few of the things that they did.</p>
<p>So I’m very glad that this new book has been put together from the memories and stories and writings and photographs of the people who were actually there. It’s like zooming in on those few paragraphs I wrote and expanding it to show us all the detail and colour that I could only hint at.</p>
<p>I’m hoping other people today will talk about some of the specific things the Ponsonby People’s Union achieved – whether it was providing cheap food for hungry families or staging occupations of substandard housing when landlords needed an extra nudge; the bus visits to prisons, or the way they worked with other groups like the Polynesian Panthers to fight racism on this city’s streets.</p>
<p>But the final thing I’d like to say is that, looking back on the counterculture era, in all its different dimensions, which ranged from the revolutionary to the ridiculous, the PPU for Survival and Freedom stands out as perhaps the most practical, principled, and inspiring example of countercultural ideals put into action.</p>
<p>This book is a reminder of what is possible. I believe that back then they used to call it “survival pending revolution”.</p>
<p>And we’ve never needed that more than now.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://aucklanduniversitypress.co.nz/authors-and-editors/n/nick-bollinger/">Nick Bollinger</a> is a Wellington-based writer, historian, broadcaster and critic. He was a music columnist for The Listener for more than 20 years, has written for Mojo and been the voice of Radio New Zealand’s music review programme The Sampler.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.steeleroberts.co.nz"><em>Ponsonby People’s Union: At the Frontline of Community Activism in the 1970s</em></a>, overview by Roger Fowler, and contributors (Steele Roberts), 2026, 102 pages.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134672" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134672" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134672" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Barry-Lee-speaking-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide.png" alt="Activist and research Barry Lee shares memories on the Progressive Youth Movement " width="680" height="493" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Barry-Lee-speaking-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Barry-Lee-speaking-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide-300x218.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Barry-Lee-speaking-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide-324x235.png 324w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Barry-Lee-speaking-at-Rogers-book-launch-APR-680wide-579x420.png 579w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134672" class="wp-caption-text">Activist and research Barry Lee shares memories on the Progressive Youth Movement (PYM) and Ponsonby People&#8217;s Union (PPU) in the 1860s-70s. Image: Asia Pacific Report</figcaption></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maher Nazzal: Shame on New Zealand&#8217;s mainstream news media</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/11/maher-nazzal-shame-on-new-zealands-mainstream-news-media/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 04:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global March for Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice and peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maher Nazzal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine Forum of New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Maher Nazzal Thousands of people took to the streets across Aotearoa New Zealand on Saturday, standing in solidarity with Palestine as part of the Global Day of Action. Yet where was the media coverage? From Auckland to Wellington, Christchurch, Dunedin, and communities across the country, people turned out to demand justice, freedom and ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Maher Nazzal</em></p>
<p>Thousands of people took to the streets across Aotearoa New Zealand on Saturday, standing in solidarity with Palestine as part of the <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/10/aotearoa-marches-vigils-kick-off-global-day-of-action-for-palestine-with-mass-protests-in-dozens-of-countries/">Global Day of Action</a>. Yet where was the media coverage?</p>
<p>From Auckland to Wellington, Christchurch, Dunedin, and communities across the country, people turned out to <a href="https://www.psna.nz/">demand justice, freedom and an end to the suffering</a> of the Palestinian people.</p>
<p>These are not insignificant gatherings. These are people exercising their democratic right to protest, raising their voices against injustice and demanding accountability.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/10/aotearoa-marches-vigils-kick-off-global-day-of-action-for-palestine-with-mass-protests-in-dozens-of-countries/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Aotearoa marches, vigils kick-off ‘global day of action’ for Palestine with mass protests in dozens of countries</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGaWC5BWWV0">Tens of thousands join pro-Palestinian march in New Zealand</a> &#8212; coverage in 2025</li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/10/10/iran-war-live-kremlin-says-trump-welcomed-russia-effort-in-iran-deal">Death toll from Israel’s war on Gaza rises to 74,370, says Health Ministry</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine">Other Palestine reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>When thousands take to the streets for Palestine, that is news. When their voices are barely heard, that raises serious questions about media priorities.</p>
<p>Whose voices are being amplified, and whose are being pushed to the margins?</p>
<p>New Zealanders deserve journalism that reflects what is happening in their communities &#8212; not selective silence when the issue is Palestine.</p>
<p>The media cannot claim to represent the public while overlooking thousands of people demanding justice.</p>
<p>Palestine is not going away. Our voices are not going away. And neither is our demand for justice.</p>
<p>Do your job. Cover the protests. Let the public see what is happening.</p>
<p><em>Maher Nazzal is chair of the Palestine Forum of New Zealand.</em></p>
<figure id="attachment_134651" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134651" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134651" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NZ-media-logos-680wide-MN.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="425" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NZ-media-logos-680wide-MN.jpg 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NZ-media-logos-680wide-MN-300x188.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/NZ-media-logos-680wide-MN-672x420.jpg 672w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134651" class="wp-caption-text">New Zealand mainstream media logos . . . &#8220;The media cannot claim to represent the public while overlooking thousands of people demanding justice.&#8221; Image: https://www.facebook.com/20531316728/posts/10154009990506729/</figcaption></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Trump &#8211; in search of a 1933 ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment for the US</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/09/donald-trump-in-search-of-a-1933-reichstag-fire-moment-for-the-us/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolf Hitler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency law decree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascist dictatorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinus van der Lubbe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nazi party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection of the People and the State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reichstag]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Ian Powell 27 February 1933 was a momentous turning point in German history; a lightning rod for what was to follow. It enabled Adolf Hitler and his Nazi party to quickly transition Germany from a formal democracy (Weimar Republic) to a fascist dictatorship (inspired by Benito Mussolini’s fascist takeover in Italy). On that ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Ian Powell</em></p>
<p>27 February 1933 was a momentous turning point in German history; a lightning rod for what was to follow.</p>
<p>It enabled Adolf Hitler and his Nazi party to quickly transition Germany from a formal democracy (Weimar Republic) to a fascist dictatorship (inspired by Benito Mussolini’s fascist takeover in Italy).</p>
<p>On that day, an unemployed Dutch construction worker named Marinus van der Lubbe set fire to the Reichstag (German Parliament) building, causing considerable damage.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/9/trump-says-us-will-not-strike-iran-before-midterm-elections"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Trump says US will not strike Iran before midterm elections</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Donald+Trump">Other Donald Trump reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The Nazis first falsely blamed the communists for the fire and then claimed emergency powers to crush all opposition, not just those it blamed.</p>
<p>The event was contrived by the newly formed Nazi government to turn public opinion against its opponents and consequently to successfully achieve these fascist objectives.</p>
<p>This began with the emergency law decree for the Protection of the People and State which restricted free speech and freedom of the press, and allowed the imprisonment of enemies without trial.</p>
<p><strong>Scene setting for US-style ‘Reichstag Fire’<br />
</strong>Fintan O’Toole is an advising editor at the <em>New York Review of Books</em> (<em>NYRB</em>). An award-winning journalist and recognised public intellectual, he is a former editor<em> The Irish Times</em> where he still continues as a longstanding columnist.</p>
<p>On 25 July 2025 he began an article (paywalled) in the <em>NYRB</em> on the direction of the United States under President Donald Trump and his MAGA movement with the above-mentioned &#8220;Reichstag Fire&#8221;: <a href="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2025/07/24/a-show-of-force-fintan-otoole/">A show of force stepping stone towards a ‘Reichstag Fire’</a>.</p>
<p>O’Toole analysed Trump’s endeavours to militarise American politics and politicise the American military describing them as unfinished business. This meant:</p>
<figure style="width: 343px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/adolf-hitler.webp?w=343" alt="Adolf Hitler" width="343" height="237" data-attachment-id="1595" data-permalink="https://politicalbytes.blog/2026/10/09/donald-trump-in-search-of-a-1933-reichstag-fire/adolf-hitler-3/" data-orig-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/adolf-hitler.webp" data-orig-size="343,237" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-title="Adolf Hitler" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/adolf-hitler.webp?w=343" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Adolf Hitler successfully manufactured &#8220;Reichstag Fire&#8221; to quickly transition Germany from formal democracy to fascist dictatorship. Image: politicalbytes.blog</figcaption></figure>
<p><em>&#8220;…defining all those who do not conform to his version of normality as mortal enemies to be confronted as though they were hostile foreign nations [and] … dismantling its self-image as an institution that transcends partisan divisions, is broadly representative of the US population, and owes its primary loyalty not to the President but to the Constitution.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>This analysis continued on to the much reported brutally derogatory narrative and actions (including armed force) against immigrants (which got much worse since the article was published) and Trump’s dishonest delusional endeavour to portray himself as having known &#8220;military life&#8221;.</p>
<figure style="width: 1024px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/augusto-pinochet.webp?w=1024" alt="Augusto Pinochet " width="1024" height="708" data-attachment-id="1599" data-permalink="https://politicalbytes.blog/2026/10/09/donald-trump-in-search-of-a-1933-reichstag-fire/augusto-pinochet/" data-orig-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/augusto-pinochet.webp" data-orig-size="1600,1107" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-title="Augusto Pinochet" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://politicalbytes.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/augusto-pinochet.webp?w=750" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Unlike Trump, other past dictators like Augusto Pinochet had real military backgrounds. Image: politicalbytes.blog</figcaption></figure>
<p>This delusional military self-image contrasts with Adolf Hitler’s actual record of being a decorated (Iron Cross) German soldier in the First World War.</p>
<p>It also contrasts with other past dictators; in particular, Benito Mussolini (Italy), Francisco Franco (Spain) and Augusto Pinochet (Chile).</p>
<p>O’Toole refers to Trump’s speech to his supporters at the 6 January 2021 insurrection;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>Language and form to achieve absolute military obedience<br />
</strong>At the time of the article’s publication in the <em>NYRB, </em>Donald Trump’s militarism was primarily about language and form, including supporting references to the Confederate insurrectionists of the American Civil War in the 1860s.</p>
<p>Pointingly, Fintan O’Toole notes that Trump:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;… is offering soldiers what fascist leaders have always offered their followers: a peculiar amalgam of the thrill of transgression and the submissive surrender to absolute obedience.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>This is the opposite of the military non-partisanship that is necessary in order to defend the US Constitution.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>Fintan O’Toole has convincingly outlined an analysis that under Donald Trump’s presidency this emerging authoritarianism in the United States is evolving towards fascism.</p>
<p>In this process, Trump is seeking his own &#8220;Reichstag Fire&#8221;. This includes seeking in various ways to use his position to rig the mid-term elections in early November for the Congress (House of Representatives) and one-third of the Senate.</p>
<p>Currently he controls both but is likely to lose the former and possibly the latter. Losing control of both is a realistic outcome given popular feeling and mobilisation.</p>
<p><strong>Desperation to seize mid-term US elections<br />
</strong>Thirteen months after the above <em>NYRB</em> article was published, the UK newspaper <em>The Independent</em> discussed this endeavour further (August 18): <a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-midterm-elections-national-emergency-b3034369.html">Trump desperate to seize elections</a>.</p>
<p>Journalist Alex Woodward outlined the Trump administration’s numerous roadblocks with courts in his attempts to seize control of these federal elections by establishing a national voter registration list that would be used to decide who is eligible to cast a ballot.</p>
<p>Trump has also not dismissed the idea of declaring a national security emergency to unilaterally enforce his takeover of federal elections. In his reported words:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK. I’ll leave it at that.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Woodward reports that Trump could also threaten to use federal troops or law enforcement “…to seize voting equipment or ballots, which would disrupt ballot collection and vote-tallying and insert a hunt for alleged fraud to satisfy his conspiracy theories.”</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>In another measure to rig the mid-term elections, the Trump administration has abruptly removed the three remaining members of the Election Assistance Commission, an independent agency tasked with supporting election officials.</p>
<p>The practical effect is to leave the key bipartisan agency effectively paralysed weeks before election day.</p>
<p>Election officials are behind-the-scenes public servants. However, they are increasingly on the frontlines of conspiracy theory-fuelled threats.</p>
<p>Woodward reports an annual poll of elections revealing that at least 38 percent of election officials have experienced threats, harassment and abuse because of their job, with more than 60 percent of those threats delivered in person. More than half feared for their safety.</p>
<p><strong>Now is the right time to compare US politics to Nazi Germany<br />
</strong>In response to the question &#8220;when is the right time to compare US politics to the Nazi era&#8221;,<em> The Guardian</em> said &#8220;now” on October 3: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/oct/03/robert-p-jones-backslide-interview">US politics today compares with Nazi politics in Germany</a>.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>Washington DC based British <em>Guardian</em> journalist David Smith writes about a book on the declining white Christian influence in the United States managing to fuel an alliance with Trump and working to reshape its &#8220;democracy&#8221;.</p>
<p>The book, <em><a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250431134/backslide/">Backslide: Reclaiming a Faith and a Nation after the Christian Turn against Democracy</a>,</em> is by Robert P Jones arising out of a consideration of studied US demographic numbers, Christian nationalism, and Trump’s use of the language of racial purity. This led him to his inescapable conclusion that “This is our 1933”.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>Jones began with the rise of the Nazi party and the complicity of the German people, including German Christians and churches.</p>
<p>He cites a Lutheran pastor, Martin Niemöller, who was eventually imprisoned for opposing Hitler. Niemöller is famously remembered for the powerful poem &#8220;First They Came&#8221;.</p>
<p>For the first four years of Hitler’s reign Niemöller did not fully oppose the Nazis. He later regretted that he and the Protestant German church did not speak out sooner.</p>
<p><strong>Revival of white Christian nationalism strengthens drive to US fascism<br />
</strong>David Smith argues convincingly that US democracy is experiencing a severe “backslide” that is directly aided and abetted by an “apostate” white Christianity, including Donald Trump’s language on the campaign trail. Further:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;This dehumanising language, talking about immigrants as vermin, and this racial purity language, like they’re &#8216;poisoning the blood of our country’. What does that mean? If they’re poisoning the blood, what’s the pure blood? We know where that story goes.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Smith then refers to Trump’s repeated use of the concept of genetic inheritance. Addressing a mostly white crowd in Minnesota in 2020, Trump declared:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;You have good genes, you know that, right? You have good genes. A lot of it is about the genes, isn’t it, don’t you believe? The racehorse theory, you think we’re so different? You have good genes in Minnesota.&#8221;</em></p>
<figure></figure>
<p>In his diagnosis, Jones links Trump’s language to the influence and activism of white Christian nationalism:</p>
<p><em>… white American Christianity has committed a profound act of apostasy by trading its spiritual core for political dominance. By endorsing anti-democratic tactics, white Christian institutions have become the primary engine behind the country’s autocratic slide.</em></p>
<p>Jones notes that whereas in 2008 white Christian Americans constituted 54 percent of the US population, by 2026 it had dropped to 41 percent. The decline among white evangelicals is even steeper. In 2000, they represented 25 percent of all Americans; today it is 13 percent.</p>
<p>Jones then observes:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Trump loves to talk about the art of the deal and, in many ways, there’s been a massive quid pro quo deal struck between a declining white evangelical population and Trump. His big appeal to them was less about policy and more anti-immigrant: I’m going to restore an America that looks like you, and I’m going to restore power to the Christian churches.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;He was literally saying on the campaign trail: this is a quid pro quo deal. Give me your votes and you won’t even have to vote again. I’ll fix it so you don’t have to vote again.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>And now for Gleichschaltung<br />
</strong>Gleichschaltung is an interesting German word meaning synchronisation or coordination.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>In the context of German history it was used to describe the process of Nazification in the mid-1930s; that is, establishing a system of totalitarian control and coordination over all aspects of German society.</p>
<p>On 1 June, I posted on Gleichschaltung in <em>Political Bytes</em>: <a href="https://politicalbytes.blog/2026/06/01/gleichschaltung-and-the-far-right-momentum-lessons-for-new-zealand/">Gleichschaltung and the far right momentum:</a></p>
<figure></figure>
<p><em>&#8220;The NZ First party is a toned-down version of the MAGA movement with deputy leader Shane Jones the loudest proponent of its rhetoric.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>In the context of Aotearoa New Zealand, my narrative in this post includes the following observation:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;New Zealand is a long way away from Nazi Germany in 1933. We are also long way away from having a Gleichschaltung. But, when certain stars align, the unexpected can occur very quickly.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;Donald Trump has succeeded by both synchronisation and coordination over the past nearly 18 months in turning immigrants in the United States into the Jews of Nazi Germany in 1933-35.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;A tipping point leading to our own Gleichschaltung should not be dismissed out-of-hand even if the recipe’s ingredients might be different.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>‘First they came . . .’<br />
</strong>It is appropriate to come back to Pastor Martin Niemöller’s famous poem (English translation of the original German version):</p>
<figure></figure>
<p><em>When the Nazis came for the communists,<br />
I kept quiet; I wasn’t a communist.<br />
When they came for the trade unionists, I kept quiet;<br />
I wasn’t a trade unionist.<br />
When they locked up the social democrats, I kept quiet;<br />
I wasn’t a social democrat.<br />
When they locked up the Jews, I kept quiet;<br />
I wasn’t a Jew.<br />
When they came for me, there was no one left to protest</em></p>
<p>In terms of Donald Trump’s &#8220;1933 trajectory&#8221; towards the mid-term elections, should he succeed then he will be well-placed to control the institutions necessary to ensure authoritarianism’s success.</p>
<p>This may well include declaring a national emergency based on a false manufactured pretext as was the case with the Reichstag fire in 1933.</p>
<p>However, his vote rigging attempts, along with the growing unpopularity of his presidency, appear to be arousing much public contempt; sufficient for him to lose control of both the Congress and Senate.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>As a narcissist who is devoid of empathy, Trump sees strategic and tactical decision making through a limiting narrow lens.</p>
<p>Anything is possible over how responds to such a plausible mid-terms defeat; attempted dictatorial actions stronger than declaring a state of emergency should be anticipated.</p>
<p>In these circumstances concerted political opposition within the Congress and Senate are important, including impeachment moves and investigations into illegalities and corruption.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>However, what will be most decisive is popular mobilisation against this drive towards a fascist state in the world’s strongest military power, whether or not Trump’s electoral vote rigging succeeds.</p>
<p>Organising the popular will is the critical task. &#8220;Power to people&#8221; as the old but permanently relevant slogan goes.</p>
<p><strong>The final word<br />
</strong>Meanwhile let’s leave the final word to Robert P Jones. In the epilogue to his above-discussed book he writes:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Just as God asked Niemöller where he was between 1933 and 1937, God will ask us where we were between 2025 and 2028. Just as Germans who backed Hitler and the Nazi Party after 1933 were fully aware of what they were joining, so Christians who have backed Trump and the MAGA movement a second time know and bear responsibility for what they are now endorsing.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Not just powerful words; very timely and directly relevant words as well. Time will tell whether Trump and his MAGA movement will achieve this endorsement; but it is not inevitable.</p>
<p>History does not have to repeat itself nor even rhyme a lot. Germany 1933 does not have to be United States 2025-28.</p>
<p><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><em><a href="https://otaihangasecondopinion.wordpress.com/about/">Ian Powell</a> is a progressive health, labour market and political “no-frills” forensic commentator in New Zealand. A former senior doctors union leader for more than 30 years, he blogs at <a href="https://otaihangasecondopinion.wordpress.com/">Second Opinion</a> and <a href="https://otaihangasecondopinion.wordpress.com/politicalbytes/">Political Bytes</a>, where this article was first published. Republished with the author’s permission.</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiji’s Online Safety Act &#8211; why it poses risks for journalism</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/09/fijis-online-safety-act-why-it-poses-risks-for-journalism/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shailendra Singh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shailendra Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Media Industry Development Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Media Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Online Safety Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FijiFirst Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynda Tabuya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiethnic communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitiveni Rabuka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conflict]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fiji’s Online Safety Act raises important questions for journalism, but also freedom of expression more broadly. The current review of the Act presents an opportunity to better safeguard the media’s democratic role, writes Dr Shailendra Singh. ANALYSIS: By Shailendra Singh In his address at last month’s Pacific Media Summit, Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka highlighted his ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Fiji’s Online Safety Act raises important questions for journalism, but also freedom of expression more broadly. The current review of the Act presents an opportunity to better safeguard the media’s democratic role, writes <strong>Dr Shailendra Singh</strong>.</em></p>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Shailendra Singh</em></p>
<p>In <a href="https://www.pmoffice.gov.fj/8th-pacific-media-summit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">his address</a> at last month’s Pacific Media Summit, Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka highlighted his government’s <a href="https://www.fijivillage.com/news/Media-Industry-Development-Act-repealed-f854rx/1000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">repeal of</a><a href="https://www.fijivillage.com/news/Media-Industry-Development-Act-repealed-f854rx/1000" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Fiji’s</a><a href="https://www.fijivillage.com/news/Media-Industry-Development-Act-repealed-f854rx/1000" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Media Industry Development Act 2010</a>, saying that it was in the interest of democracy.</p>
<p>While the Rabuka government has been rightly recognised for scrapping that Act in 2023, another piece of legislation with potential significant implications for journalism remains in force &#8212; the <em><a href="https://www.parliament.gov.fj/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Bill-7-Online-Safety-.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Online Safety Act 2018</a></em>.</p>
<p>Like the Media Act, the Online Safety Act was enacted under the FijiFirst government and gives the state a role in regulating expression.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.fijivillage.com/news/special-fijivillage-straight-talk-public-forum-on-online-safety-2dc625/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Special fijivillage Straight Talk public forum on online safety</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Fiji+online+safety">Other Fiji online safety reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The Online Safety Act was <a href="https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fijitimes.com.fj%2Fbehind-the-news-the-need-to-reform-online-safety-act%2F&amp;data=05%7C02%7CMegan.Dingwall%40anu.edu.au%7C05b79cd535474e01aa5808df1cf3eea6%7Ce37d725cab5c46249ae5f0533e486437%7C0%7C0%7C639261506203682455%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=C%2F1Aw5PlM9ZVWRHPpiGJP4hwjFjo%2B6chcUkxVz%2FqUiU%3D&amp;reserved=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tabled in Parliament</a> in 2018 in response to escalating social media abuse, but was controversial from the outset, especially the breadth of its provisions.</p>
<p>The backlash was such that the <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/pacific-media-watch/fiji-online-safety-law-divides-nation-amid-fears-internet-censorship-10280.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">entire opposition voted against it</a>, arguing that it undermined democracy. Rights groups were similarly alarmed, describing the Act as a <a href="https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/443/615" target="_blank" rel="noopener">“Trojan horse” for censorship</a>.</p>
<p>However, because much of the attention focused on the draconian Media Act, and relatively few people were being charged under the Online Safety Act, the latter escaped sustained scrutiny.</p>
<p>That changed in 2025, as the <a href="https://www.fijitimes.com.fj/online-safety-worry/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">unabated abuse of digital platforms</a> and a spate of charges laid under Section 24 of the Act, which criminalises the posting of electronic communication that causes harm, <a href="https://www.fijitimes.com.fj/dialogue-fiji-raises-alarm-over-use-of-online-safety-law-to-prosecute-citizens/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">brought it back into the spotlight</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Expecting stronger legislation</strong><br />
Currently, the Act is under review and Information Minister Lynda Tabuya, under whose ministry the Act falls, has told Parliament <a href="https://www.fbcnews.com.fj/news/govt-plans-stronger-online-safety-laws-by-year-end/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">to expect stronger legislation</a> by the end of this year.</p>
<p>To some extent, Tabuya’s call for tougher laws is understandable. The misuse of social media platforms is a global problem, but the threat is considered greater in fragile democracies with multiethnic societies, such as Fiji.</p>
<p>The Online Safety Commission received 1609 complaints in 2025 alone, with <a href="https://www.fijivillage.com/news/online-safety-commission-calls-for-stronger-laws-and-adequate-budgets-to-ensure-victims-get-justice-1613fe/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">more than 50 percent</a> involving cyberbullying, harassment and defamation.</p>
<p>More broadly, policymakers have warned that online misconduct poses a serious national security threat.</p>
<p>In March 2026, <a href="https://fijisun.com.fj/news/nation/a-single-lie-can-divide-a-nation--tabuya-warns-on-misinformation-online" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tabuya flagged the increased prevalence</a> of misinformation and disinformation, stating, “A single lie can divide a nation”.  Likewise, Fiji’s <em>National Security Strategy 2025-2029 </em>warned the malicious use of emerging technologies for misinformation and disinformation posed a threat and could “undermine the credibility of national leaders and erode public trust in governance structures”.</p>
<p>Even before the proliferation of social networking platforms, there were concerns in Fiji about the mainstream media’s alleged role in fomenting societal conflict, with some analysis even suggesting that <a href="https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/items/14929e51-40f2-4969-9ab5-8d5f279bee76" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the media acted as a catalyst</a> in the 2000 and <a href="https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/items/e82c3189-8ce1-4fa5-b303-0f7fe864bf97/full" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2006 coups</a>.</p>
<p>The increase in digital penetration has added a new dimension to these security challenges.</p>
<p>Young people particularly, the most <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/publications-and-resources/research/briefings/pacific-islands/understanding-audiences-pacific-islands-2025" target="_blank" rel="noopener">avid consumers of online networks</a>, risk exposure to disparaging and <a href="https://www.fijitimes.com.fj/plan-to-tackle-online-threats/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">damaging online discourses</a>, including racism and hate speech.</p>
<p>While these trends are serious and require a firm response, they do not negate legitimate concerns about the flaws in the Online Safety Act.</p>
<p><strong>Implications for media and press freedom<br />
</strong>While the aim of the Act is not specifically to regulate media &#8212; Section 4 stipulates the law applies to the “whole of Fiji” &#8212; media are, nonetheless, caught in its crossfire.</p>
<p>The Act contains no protections for the practice of journalism. Professional journalists using social media platforms in the public interest are lumped with ordinary citizens who may be using them with malicious intent.</p>
<p>This renders journalists and media organisations particularly vulnerable to the Act due to the broad provisions of “electronic communication” that causes “harm” (defined in the Act as “serious emotional distress”), as most of their work is published online and can require critiquing the actions of private individuals and public officials.</p>
<p>The Act also does not differentiate between public and private individuals. In general, public figures such as politicians enjoy a lower level of privacy compared to private citizens. The scrutiny can extend to their private lives should they overlap with, or endanger the fulfillment of, their public duties.</p>
<p>Under the Online Safety Act, media could be held culpable if their reporting causes individuals “serious emotional distress”, which could be a consequence of, for example, news coverage of actual or alleged wrongdoing.</p>
<p>Then there is Section 2’s treatment of electronic communication as “any information, whether truthful or untruthful…”. This suggests journalists publishing legitimate and verified information in the course of their professional duties could face the same criminal liability as bad actors posting untruthful content with malicious intent.</p>
<p>Section 6 raises concerns about the independence of the Online Safety Commission, including the ministerial-appointed Commissioner, which introduces the risk of a political appointment.</p>
<p>Indeed, the appointment of Anne Dunn as the first Commissioner by the then Communications Minister Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum <a href="https://devpolicy.org/controlling-the-internet-in-fiji-20190121/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">was controversial for this very reason</a>. Dunn <a href="https://www.fijitimes.com.fj/abuse-of-office-claim-2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">contested Fiji’s 2018 election</a> under Sayed-Khaiyum’s FijiFirst Party.</p>
<p>The potential conflict of interest could render the Commission vulnerable to political pressure, and have consequences for the Commissioner’s role as an independent and unbiased authority.</p>
<p>The Act does outline seven factors the courts may use to determine whether an offence has occurred, including: the extremity of the content; the age and characteristics of the victim; whether the posting was anonymous; the repetitiveness and extent of circulation; and its truth or falsity, along with the context in which it appeared.</p>
<p>However, it does not provide specific defences based on public interest, truth, reasonable error, or the absence of malice.</p>
<p><strong>An opportunity for reform<br />
</strong>The fact that no journalist or media organisation has been charged under the Act in the eight years since its inception is of little consolation. No journalist or media organisation was charged under the now-repealed Media Act, but we are all aware of that legislation’s deleterious effect on the media sector as a deterrent to robust journalism and a catalyst for self-censorship.</p>
<p>Some criticisms of the Online Safety Act &#8212; including its open-ended provisions, the Minister’s role in appointing the Commissioner, and the potentially chilling effect on freedom of expression &#8212; are uncannily similar to those expressed about the Media Act.</p>
<p>Against this backdrop, <a href="https://www.fiji.gov.fj/pm-rabuka-addresses-the-8th-pacific-media-summit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rabuka’s remarks at the Pacific Media Summit</a> are pertinent. The Prime Minister emphasised that the media are “not a threat to democracy” but a “part of” it.</p>
<p>The reviewers of the Online Safety Act would do well to heed his words, as well as those of Rabuka’s deputy, Manoa Kamikamica, at the same event. Kamikamica stated that while this government was committed to media freedom, <a href="https://www.fbcnews.com.fj/news/kamikamica-warns-media-freedom-could-change/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">there was no guarantee future governments would share the same mindset</a>.</p>
<p>In other words, the weaponisation of the Online Safety Act might not be a present danger, but it cannot be ruled out as a future one.</p>
<p><em>Associate Professor Shailendra Singh is head of journalism at The University of the South Pacific. This article is derived from his submission to the review of the Online Safety Act 2018 and was first published by <a href="https://pacificsecurity.net/">Pacific Security</a>. It is republished with the author&#8217;s permission. Dr Singh&#8217;s views are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of his employer.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jonathan Cook: The West wants Netanyahu gone – so Palestinians can be killed more quietly again</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/09/jonathan-cook-the-west-wants-netanyahu-gone-so-palestinians-can-be-killed-more-quietly-again/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC arrest warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Court t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied West Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine ghettoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Donald Trump, nosediving in the polls and bristling over a disastrous war on Iran, needs a scapegoat &#8212; and the Israeli prime minister best fits the bill, writes Jonathan Cook. COMMENTARY: By Jonathan Cook Benjamin Netanyahu’s whirlwind visit to the United States late last month to address the United Nations General Assembly was further evidence ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Donald Trump, nosediving in the polls and bristling over a disastrous war on Iran, needs a scapegoat &#8212; and the Israeli prime minister best fits the bill, writes <strong>Jonathan Cook</strong>.<br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Jonathan Cook</em></p>
<p>Benjamin Netanyahu’s whirlwind visit to the United States late last month to address the United Nations General Assembly was further evidence that the Israeli prime minister is now a universal pariah.</p>
<p>He is being abandoned even by his closest allies.</p>
<p>It was perhaps not surprising that 77 nations, including a handful of European states, <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/un-general-assembly-2026-walkout-israel-speech-war-middle-east-war-spotlight">walked out</a> of the chamber in protest that <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/what-are-benjamin-netanyahu-and-yoav-gallant-accused">a wanted war crimes suspect</a> &#8212; a fugitive from the International Criminal Court (ICC) &#8212; was being given a platform to speak on the world’s largest stage.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/8/how-october-7-redrew-the-map-of-the-middle-east"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Map of Middle East redrawn after October 7</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+West+Bank">Other Gaza, West Bank reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Far more notable was what happened &#8212; or rather, didn’t &#8212; away from the podium. Netanyahu spent just eight hours in the US before heading back to Israel. It is hard to believe that that was his choice.</p>
<p>He was denied his usual moment in the sun with US President Donald Trump at the White House, and could not even secure a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio.</p>
<p>There was no invitation to address the US Congress, and with it familiar scenes of legislators <a href="https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=860875862571107">rapturously celebrating</a> his anti-Palestinian incitement.</p>
<p>Israel’s former Ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren, <a href="https://archive.ph/0yQud">told</a> Reuters: “I don’t recall a time when the prime minister came to the United States and didn’t meet with the president.”</p>
<p><strong>Stark contrast to Xi</strong><br />
The shunning of Netanyahu stood in stark contrast to the reception of Xi Jinping. The Chinese leader was <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqgmrk7187lzo">personally greeted</a> at the airport by Trump with a red carpet and military flyover.</p>
<p>Netanyahu’s UN visit was exploited by both sides &#8212; by Israeli officials and Western leaders &#8212; to advance their separate, and conflicting, agendas.</p>
<p>Netanyahu is less than a month away from a hotly contested general election in which, for the first time, his failures to prevent Hamas’s attack on 7 October 2023 are under intense scrutiny.</p>
<p>According to a growing number of recent reports, he was <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/sep/08/netanyahu-warned-7-october-hamas-book-haaretz">warned</a> by Egyptian and Gulf leaders of a major event &#8212; <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-security/2026-09-28/ty-article/.premium/egypt-warned-netanyahu-of-hamas-attack-days-before-october-7-report-says/000001a0-e5cc-db4b-a7a5-f7fed9e20000">an “earthquake”</a> &#8212; coming from Gaza in the days and weeks preceding Hamas’ breakout, but failed to act.</p>
<p>Netanyahu had scheduled his UN speech for Israeli prime time, to attract the largest domestic audience possible. He took the opportunity to <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDKmP8hO9EE">call out</a> other world leaders as “moral cowards” and “hypocrites”.</p>
<p>As Israeli analyst Jonathan Ofir notes, Netanyahu also used the UN platform to <a href="https://mondoweiss.net/2026/09/netanyahu-just-incited-genocide-in-his-un-speech-heres-what-you-missed/">smuggle in a biblical phrase</a> in Hebrew that was designed, for listeners back home, to serve as a dog-whistle: a call for Israel to carry out genocide to the bitter end.</p>
<p>Netanyahu’s goal was to demonstrate to voters that he is still a force to be reckoned with on the international stage, and that he alone can make Israel safe from a world supposedly mired in “antisemitic”, anti-Israel sentiment.</p>
<p><strong>Nudging Netanyahu out of office</strong><br />
Western leaders, by contrast, wish to demonstrate the precise opposite, hoping to nudge Netanyahu out of office by suggesting to Israelis that their leader is a spent force, that he has gone too far.</p>
<p>Time to be rid of him.</p>
<p>This may prove no simple matter. Netanyahu is the great political survivor, serving a record near-two decades as his country’s prime minister &#8212; longer even than Israel’s founding father, David Ben Gurion. He has used that time to whip up much of Israeli society into an ever greater, ultra-nationalist, genocidal fervour.</p>
<p>The current antipathy in Western capitals to Netanyahu is most certainly not based on any kind of ethical assessment of Israel’s recent actions: <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/topics/israel-genocide-gaza">a three-year genocidal rampage</a> through Gaza; <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/israeli-settler-hikes-through-my-west-bank-village-next-violent-land-grabs">the violent expansion</a> of Jewish settlements and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kg_VT59kPUM">ethnic cleansing</a> in the Occupied West Bank; the bombing and <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/how-israel-laying-groundwork-ethnic-cleansing-southern-lebanon">ethnic cleansing of south Lebanon</a>; and the Israeli leader’s starring role alongside the US in launching a catastrophic <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/topics/war-on-iran">war on Iran</a> whose fallout has <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/iran-war-wreaks-havoc-global-economy-and-could-spark-recession-says-imf">destabilised</a> the global economy.</p>
<p>Washington &#8212; backed by its European client states &#8212; has been an ardent partner to these crimes, supplying the munitions, intelligence and diplomatic leverage to help Israel carry them out.</p>
<p>But Netanyahu now looks to be a political liability, even for Trump.</p>
<p>The US President, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-approval-falls-career-low-32-high-costs-bite-reutersipsos-poll-finds-2026-09-21/">nosediving in the polls</a>, needs a scapegoat &#8212; and the Israeli prime minister appears the only one suited for the role.</p>
<p>The antagonism is, in part, personal.</p>
<p><strong>Netanyahu seduced Trump on Iran</strong><br />
A number of recent reports indicate that Netanyahu pulled out all the stops <a href="https://archive.ph/8OeDd">to seduce </a>Trump, against the advice of his generals, into launching an unprovoked and illegal war on Iran.</p>
<p>The promise of a decisive victory persuaded Trump he could secure his place in the history books as the president who “remade the Middle East”. Once Iran was out of the picture, the US would enjoy unchallenged control over the region’s oil.</p>
<p>And all of this would supposedly take place weeks after Trump had cemented his command over Venezuela’s oil, following <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/explainers/why-us-wants-venezuelan-oil-explained-five-graphs">an illegal operation</a> at the start of the year to kidnap President Nicholas Maduro.</p>
<p>With Iran’s defeat, and Venezuela subjugated, economic rival China would find itself utterly dependent on the US for access to the main lubricant of the global economy. Trump could avoid a direct military confrontation with Beijing, bringing it to heel simply by threatening to turn off the oil spigot.</p>
<p>But, of course none of this came to pass.</p>
<p>Washington is now in an unwinnable war with Iran that has clarified to Tehran the extent of its power over the Strait of Hormuz &#8212; and of <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/sep/11/iran-houthi-allies-capture-strategic-island-bab-al-mandab-strait">the parallel power</a> of Ansar Allah, its allies in Yemen, over the Bab al-Mandab Strait. Together, they can inflict unmitigated damage to the world economy.</p>
<p>Soaring petrol prices on US forecourts are likely to be <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/28/diesel-oil-trump-export-ban-fuel-prices.html">a critical factor</a> in the collapse of the Republican vote in November’s mid-term elections and the likely loss of both Houses to the Democrats, turning Trump into a lame-duck president.</p>
<p><strong>Supremely vulnerable</strong><br />
Meanwhile, the war has educated Washington’s client states in the Gulf that they are supremely vulnerable to any retaliation from Tehran and from Yemen &#8212; a fact they are <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2026/09/22/middleeast/gulf-leaders-trump-fear-more-war-less-protection-intl">reminded</a> of every time Trump orders another reckless round of strikes on Iran.</p>
<p>For all its military might, Washington has shown it is unable to defend its Gulf allies.</p>
<p>But Netanyahu is not facing a reckoning just because of his role in engineering a disastrous war on Iran.</p>
<p>Despite the best efforts of Western political and media classes over the past three years, the reality of Israel’s destruction of Gaza &#8212; and the murder and maiming of many tens of thousands of Palestinian children &#8212; has become ever harder to hide or rationalise.</p>
<p>Even among those parts of the public little interested in world affairs, the truth is gradually sinking in, aided by battles in mainstream cultural spaces that have swung conclusively against Israel.</p>
<p><strong>NAZA standing ovation<br />
</strong><a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/discover/naza-review-israel-gaza-idf-palestine"><em>NAZA</em></a>, a new documentary on Gaza made by Israeli film-makers, won a record, 25-minute standing ovation at last month’s Venice Film Festival. In it, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/sep/27/naza-film-new-york-city-premiere">anonymised</a> Israeli soldiers and intelligence officers document in detail how they engineered genocide in the tiny enclave. It is scheduled to be available to stream for free in November.</p>
<p>Ireland’s team, forced to play Israel in the Uefa Nations League at the weekend, did not hide their feelings. They wore black armbands in a show of solidarity with Israel’s victims in Gaza and refused to shake hands with their opponents. Irish captain Dara O’Shea <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ckddvv5dn4eyo">pledged</a> to donate his match earnings to humanitarian causes in Gaza.</p>
<p>Superstar musician <a href="https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/ed-sheeran-just-learnt-being-pimped">Ed Sheeran</a> has found himself unexpectedly painted as the bad guy for failing to stand by his support act, the rapper Macklemore, over the latter’s comments opposing genocide in Gaza.</p>
<p>Predictably, when faced with pro-Israel stadium owners <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/pro-israel-billionaire-robert-kraft-led-campaign-drop-macklemore-ed-sheeran-tour">threatening</a> to pull the plug on the tour, Sheeran caved and dropped Macklemore. But Sheeran is reeling from a widespread backlash that clearly took him by surprise.</p>
<p>And leading British politicians, such as former prime minister Keir Starmer and foreign secretaries David Cameron and David Lammy, are for the first time facing serious critical scrutiny in the mainstream over their conduct towards Gaza.</p>
<p>Last month, <a href="https://www.channel4.com/programmes/britains-gaza-secrets-exposed-dispatches/on-demand/78340-001">a Channel 4 documentary</a>, <em>Britain’s Gaza Secrets Exposed</em>, revealed that British officials had imposed a deeply flawed methodology, apparently so they could ignore mounting evidence of systematic Israeli war crimes in Gaza.</p>
<p>As a result, they were able to duck out of their legal obligations to take action against Israel, including by ending arms sales.</p>
<p><strong>Rising tide of revulsion</strong><br />
Western capitals are finally realising this rising tide of revulsion at the Gaza genocide cannot be staunched.</p>
<p>In the US, where bonds to Israel are invariably described by politicians as “unbreakable”, <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/07/09/americans-views-of-israelis-have-grown-increasingly-negative-but-views-of-palestinians-have-held-fairly-steady/">62 percent</a> of respondents told Pew in July they had a negative opinion of Netanyahu’s government.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a poll last month found <a href="https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-909078">60 percent</a> of American Jews want the Israeli prime minister voted out at the forthcoming election.</p>
<p>As Israel’s <em>Haaretz</em> newspaper <a href="https://archive.ph/LbO3z">observed</a>: “Trump is well aware of the consistent, dizzying decline in support for Israel among Americans.”</p>
<p>Which is why he and other Western politicians are desperate to reframe the conversation. Singling out Netanyahu over Israeli atrocities in Gaza does not get them off the hook because they so obviously partnered with him every step of the way.</p>
<p>Instead Western leaders want to switch focus to the West Bank, where their role is more easily obscured and Netahyahu’s law-breaking is unmistakable.</p>
<p>Since October 2023, he, along with his self-confessed fascist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, have given both violent Jewish settler militias and the Israeli military <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-01-16/ty-article/.premium/israels-far-right-finance-minister-im-a-fascist-homophobe-but-i-wont-stone-gays/00000185-b921-de59-a98f-ff7f47c70000">greater freedom to terrorise</a> Palestinian families off their land in preparation for <a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/08/20/west-bank-israel-backed-settler-violence-drives-displacemen">the West Bank’s annexation.</a></p>
<p><strong>Illegal West Bank settlements role</strong><br />
In the West’s new, self-serving narrative, Netanyahu isn’t a pariah because he is <a href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/defendant/netanyahu">sought by</a> the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity in starving the people of Gaza.</p>
<p>Nor because the International Court of Justice is currently investigating his government over <a href="https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/01/gaza-icj-ruling-offers-hope-protection-civilians-enduring-apocalyptic">“plausible” allegations</a> that it is committing a genocide in the enclave.</p>
<p>Nor because his government has overseen the killing of at least <a href="https://www.unicef.org/sop/reports/unicef-state-palestine-humanitarian-situation-update">21,000 children</a> there &#8212; and most likely, far more.</p>
<p>Nor because he continues to violate a sham “ceasefire”, one in which Israel has killed more than<a href="https://www.trtworld.com/article/ae37cbf2f7f3"> 1400 Palestinians</a> penned up in the ruins of their enclave since the fighting supposedly ended. A further 4900 of Gaza’s residents have been maimed over the same period.</p>
<p>No, Netanyahu is not a pariah in the eyes of Western leaders because of any of these savage crimes &#8212; crimes they have been fully complicit in.</p>
<p>His offence &#8212; the one they are now determined to focus attention on &#8212; is Netanyahu’s role since October 2023 in intensifying the building and expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank to expel Palestinians from their lands.</p>
<p>But this narrative works only if Western politicians and media studiously ignore the context: that for more than half a century, all Israeli governments sponsored settlement expansion, with the aim of ethnically cleansing the Palestinian population.</p>
<p><strong>Exploited the opportunity</strong><br />
Netanyahu is not an outlier in doing this. He simply exploited the opportunity to accelerate West Bank expulsions on the back of world sympathy after Hamas’s single-day attack in October 2023.</p>
<p>The most likely explanation for why Britain and 11 other Western states, including France and Canada, <a href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/milibands-settlement-trade-ban-cosmetic-work-must-sanction-israe">declared</a> their intention last month to impose sanctions on West Bank settlements is that they had <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/sep/09/israel-sanctions-will-not-hurt-intelligence-sharing-between-spy-agencies-says-miliband">received signs</a> from the Trump administration for the first time that there would be no serious repercussions for doing so.</p>
<p>Britain’s new government under Andy Burnham also dared to describe what Israel has done to West Bank Palestinians as “ethnic cleansing”. Notably, and paradoxically, the UK has avoided using the term to describe Israel’s even more brazen ethnic cleansing in Gaza &#8212; a campaign of expulsions that have all too clearly been aided by Western bombs and logistics.</p>
<p>Officials under Mike Huckabee, the fervently partisan US ambassador to Israel, reportedly <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/us-drafted-memo-condemning-uk-over-west-bank-sanctions-it-was-never-released-2026-09-23/">drafted</a> a stinging rebuke in preparation for the British announcement of sanctions. It accused London of replicating the “playbook of the antisemitic boycott, divestment and sanctions [BDS] movement”.</p>
<p>That expected line of attack, favoured by Israel lobby groups, was presumably the reason why Ed Miliband, the UK’s foreign secretary, went to such exaggerated lengths to publicly <a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/full-speech-ed-miliband-lays-out-uks-new-approach-to-support-two-state-solution/">distance</a> his new policy from BDS.</p>
<p>But in fact, no attack materialised from the Trump administration. Instead, Marco Rubio, Miliband’s US counterpart, stated innocuously: “I don’t have any comment on it [the sanctions policy] right now.”</p>
<p>The next day Trump appeared to buy time with a uncharacteristically <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cevw2lxnwk9o">non-committal response</a>: “I want to find out why all of a sudden has that [the announcement of UK sanctions] happened.”</p>
<p>Trump and Rubio have said nothing more of substance on the matter.</p>
<p><strong>Failure to listen to warnings</strong><br />
Then there is the recent flood of media reports suggesting that Netanyahu personally<a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahus-narrative-of-ignorance-on-october-7-is-rapidly-unraveling/"> failed to listen</a> to multiple warnings from Egypt and the United Arab Emirates that an unprecedented attack was coming from Gaza in the days before Hamas’ break-out on 7 October 2023.</p>
<p>Netanyahu has <a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-asked-uae-leader-to-deny-reports-he-warned-of-looming-hamas-attack-sources/">called</a> on Abu Dhabi to deny the leaks. But it has so far failed to help out by doing so.</p>
<p>The two countries, among Washington’s closest client states in the region, have always appeared <a href="https://observer.co.uk/news/international/article/gulf-leaders-fear-trumps-ability-to-keep-them-safe-from-iran-after-un-annihilation-speech">anxious to avoid</a> openly defying a notoriously vengeful Trump.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-at-unga-22-september-2026">his address</a> to the UN, Burnham noted the dilemma facing Western governments: “We live in an age of low trust in politics. If we were to continue to talk about the two-state solution, but fail to back those words with deeds, that trust will fall even lower &#8212; and our enemies will seek to exploit the alienation that follows from that.”</p>
<p>Burnham seems oblivious to the reality: that part of the reason trust is so low is because a succession of British governments have not only colluded in the genocide in Gaza but arrested critics of the genocide as supporters of terrorism.</p>
<p>Miliband <a href="https://x.com/SkyNews/status/2104513118256697551">demonstrated</a> precisely the kind of hypocrisy Burnham had warned is alienating the public when he told the Labour Party conference last week &#8212; to great applause &#8212; that “millions of people in this country”, opponents of the genocide, “were right”.</p>
<p>The previous day dozens of protesters had been <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/sep/28/dozens-arrested-pro-palestine-protest-labour-conference">arrested</a> outside the conference venue for silently holding signs stating: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”</p>
<p>Burnham and Miliband wish to have their cake and eat it. Neither has indicated that there is any <a href="https://x.com/Jonathan_K_Cook/status/2104722704532115766">intention to scrap</a> the previous government’s decision to use terrorism laws against anyone who holds such a sign &#8212; or is “right”, as Miliband now admits.</p>
<p><strong>Cynical theatre of distraction</strong><br />
What Western leaders are engaged in here is the cynical theatre of distraction.</p>
<p>The declarations of “You were right” and “We feel your pain”, the promises of sanctions and urgent calls for two states, amount to nothing more than virtue-signalling. They are designed to divert public indignation over Israel’s atrocities away from the complicity of Western capitals and direct it exclusively at Netanyahu.</p>
<p>The new spin suggests the gun-wielding, religious zealots in the West Bank settlements who have been growing ever more violent and politically powerful for over half a century &#8212; under successive Israeli governments &#8212; are solely Netanyahu’s creation.</p>
<p>The new spin argues that the growing confidence of these pogromists, who have long worked hand in glove with the Israeli military, is entirely unrelated to the West’s unconditional support for Israel over many decades.</p>
<p>In absolving themselves, however, Western leaders are necessarily crafting a new lie to deceive their publics: one that suggests the “settler terrorists” are some kind of personal Netanyahu militia that stands or falls with his premiership.</p>
<p>The implication of this new narrative is that, were Netanyahu to be prised from power, a more empathetic leadership would emerge, one that could be cultivated by Western powers to make peace with the Palestinians.</p>
<p>This is all patent nonsense.</p>
<p><strong>Supremacist political spectrum</strong><br />
Like the Israeli public, leaders from across Israel’s narrow Zionist, ethnic supremacist political spectrum shared the genocidal logic that propelled forward the past three-year erasure of Gaza.</p>
<p>None dissented. All engaged in genocidal incitement.</p>
<p>There is no hope of their making peace with the Palestinians under illegal occupation when Israeli leaders cannot even allow their own Palestinian “citizens” &#8212; a much-oppressed minority comprising a fifth of Israel’s population – a meaningful voice in next month’s general election.</p>
<p>The central elections committee, a political body whose members are drawn from Israel’s main parties, <a href="https://www.adalah.org/en/content/view/11703">voted to ban</a> from standing all four factions representing the Palestinian minority.</p>
<p>Whoever wins next month’s election, whether Netanyahu again or one of his rivals, will keep the country heading on the same ethnic supremacist track Israel has been on for decades. Trump, Burnham, Macron and other western leaders understand this.</p>
<p>They want Netanyahu out of the way not so there is real change but simply so they can revert to what constituted business as usual before the Gaza genocide: a slower, more incremental pace to the eradication of the Palestinian people.</p>
<p><strong>Rebranding the Gaza genocide</strong><br />
They want to be able to rebrand the Gaza genocide as one man’s historic folly, a tragic catastrophe that cannot be reversed but can be mitigated if he is gone.</p>
<p>They want us looking resolutely forwards, to real-estate deals and a distant two-state solution, not backwards: to their active role in levelling the homes of more than two million people – with mostly US munitions that unleashed eight times the explosive force of the atom bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.</p>
<p>The Trump administration has already <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/15/trump-administration-bomb-supply-israel-gaza">okayed</a> the shipment of vast numbers of these mega bombs to replenish Israeli stocks, even before the result of the Israeli election is known.</p>
<p>Notably, the same Trump administration that allowed Netanyahu, a war crimes suspect, to travel to the UN in New York <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq783jlrr282o">blocked</a> the putative leader of the Palestinians, Mahmoud Abbas, from doing so.</p>
<p>In announcing his new sanctions policy targeting Israel’s illegal settlements, Miliband was <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/sep/09/israel-sanctions-will-not-hurt-intelligence-sharing-between-spy-agencies-says-miliband">keen to stress</a> that it would in no way affect intelligence sharing with Israel &#8212; the kind of intelligence coordination that saw British planes <a href="https://www.declassifieduk.org/britain-sent-over-500-spy-flights-to-gaza/">carrying out surveillance</a> operations over Gaza throughout the genocide.</p>
<p>And while Miliband promised a “double lock against arms exports” to Israel as part of the UK’s sanctions package, in practice <a href="https://www.declassifieduk.org/uk-sanctions-on-israel-result-in-no-extra-arms-export-suspensions/">not a single</a> existing arms export licence has been revoked or suspended since.</p>
<p>The current fight is not against a genocidal Israeli state or for some illusionary Palestinian state &#8212; let alone for justice for the endlessly abused Palestinian people.</p>
<p><strong>Engineering a reset</strong><br />
It is about engineering a reset in which the West gets Israel’s old guard back in charge.</p>
<p>Western leaders have been embarrassed by the froth-mouthed rantings of Netanyahu’s government. This week Smotrich called for Israel to unleash its genocidal Gaza policies on the West Bank &#8212; presumably using the very bombs Trump is about to ship them.</p>
<p>He <a href="https://www.palestinechronicle.com/do-what-we-did-in-gaza-smotrich-calls-for-war-on-occupied-west-bank/">told</a> the Israeli media: “We should do there what we did in Gaza.”</p>
<p>Western leaders fear what that would do to their sinking credibility. And they have allies in Israel, among its opposition, whose vision &#8212; at least for the moment &#8212; is not Smotrich’s of a Gaza-style eradication of the West Bank.</p>
<p>Rather they envision continuing the current trajectory of gradually turning the West Bank’s small, surviving Palestinian ghettos, trapped in a sea of illegal Jewish settlements, into mini-concentration camps &#8212; replicas of Gaza before it was destroyed.</p>
<p>Those are the competing visions among Israelis for the West Bank: the absolute confinement of Palestinians in a series of cages versus their extermination.</p>
<p>That is what is really at stake &#8212; nothing more &#8212; in the West’s struggle to unseat Netanyahu and uphold its fabled two-state solution.</p>
<p><em><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><a href="https://twitter.com/jonathan_k_cook/">Jonathan Cook</a> is a writer, journalist and self-appointed media critic and author of many books about Palestine. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. This article was first published by Middle East Eye and republished from the author’s Substack with permission.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Flying High Dubai&#8217; &#8211; Michael West Media responds to ABC Media Watch</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/07/flying-high-dubai-michael-west-media-responds-to-abc-media-watch/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ABC Media Watch has accused Michael West of “perpetuating unsubstantiated conspiracy theories” online. We say the failure of journalism by ABC and other legacy media makes them culpable in the Gaza genocide. Michael West Media. EDITORIAL: By Michael West, founder of Michael West Media On Friday, Mario Christodoulou, executive producer of ABC Media Watch, quoted ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>ABC Media Watch has accused Michael West of “perpetuating unsubstantiated conspiracy theories” online. We say the failure of journalism by ABC and other legacy media makes them culpable in the Gaza genocide. <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/"><strong>Michael West Media</strong></a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>EDITORIAL:</strong> <em>By Michael West, founder of Michael West Media<br />
</em></p>
<p>On Friday, Mario Christodoulou, executive producer of ABC <em>Media Watch</em>, quoted two posts we had made on X regarding last Wednesday’s FlyDubai &#8220;terror hijacking&#8221; incident and asked two questions:</p>
<p><em>Do you believe this incident was an Israeli Government “false flag” event? If so, on what basis? If not, how do you explain your posts above?</em></p>
<p><em>Perpetuating unsubstantiated conspiracy theories like this, especially from an established journalist such as yourself, can help spread misinformation. Your post likely contributed to this. What is your response?</em></p>
<p>(Full email and X posts below.)</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>WATCH MORE:</strong> <a href="https://youtu.be/ILQk3wsn80c?si=Iab6BLEMIAqfmeFU">Al Jazeera&#8217;s <em>The Listening Post</em> &#8211; Netanyahu’s fight for political survival: PR stunts and press control</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Our response</strong></p>
<p><em>Hi Mario,</em></p>
<p><em>Excellent questions. You are barking up the wrong tree, however. My take on both flydubai and RAF Fairford is clearly &#8212; and the word was used in one of the tweets &#8212; “probably” false flags, or at the least &#8220;beat-ups&#8221; concocted for political advantage.</em></p>
<p><em>This view is borne out by evidence of multiple false flag attacks in Australia, as belatedly admitted by police, and around the world.</em></p>
<p><em>The bigger story, the real public interest in media coverage of these incidents, is how they are leveraged by our politicians and a compliant mainstream media. The minute they occur, whether actual false flags or just suspicious incidents, they are branded as “terror plots”, “Islamist attacks … jihadis” etc.</em></p>
<p><em>This media branding of these events, *before* the circumstances are known and the evidence is established, has given licence to political actions such as the ramping up of hate speech laws in Australia and justification for passing the private data of Australian citizens to foreign parties as per the arrangements with Cellebrite and Palantir.</em></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">As a pilot for 20 years I have questions:</p>
<p>&#8211; where are the cabin crew here?<br />
&#8211; where are the oxygen masks that automatically drop during a rapid emergency descent?<br />
&#8211; how did the Capt manage to open the door while being stabbed?<br />
&#8211; Omani pilots were not allowed to fly to Israel, why was he allowed?<br />
&#8211; how did the offending pilot get a weapon onboard?<br />
&#8211; why has this happened so close to elections?<br />
&#8211; how are passengers walking around while apparently in a nosedive?<br />
&#8211; who else was injured? Nose dives cause significant g force incidents<br />
&#8211; why is there two perfectly positioned people recording the incident and not helping?<br />
&#8211; why did a plumber take control and not the 2 pilots onboard who would certainly know when an aircraft was in a nosedive?<br />
&#8211; why was the plumber speaking in English to Bibi after the flight<br />
&#8211; why was he still in his blood soaked clothes 8 hours after the incident</p>
<p>False Flags have been a very effective mechanism to influence public opinion</p>
<p>Hitler burnt down the Reichstag just before his parliament elections and he won the election…changing the course of history.</p>
<p>A full and independent investigation should be carried out here.</p>
<p>Hopefully independent journalist will be allowed to view this too.</p>
<p>— The Long Investor (@TheLongInvest) <a href="https://x.com/TheLongInvest/status/2105734670457676170?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><em>flydubai X post retweeted by MW</em></p>
<p><em>Let’s say flydubai is not a false flag in a technical sense; that is, a ploy cooked up by the Netanyahu regime in Israel just a few weeks before the election. Let’s just say it was actually a fight between the pilots and a happy ending. The fact that the initial coverage branded the event as a terrorist hijacking demonstrates that the incident was used for political gain.</em></p>
<p><em>The Fairford incident was also branded as a terrorist plot in its initial coverage, egged on by Trump and Rubio and the usual people on social media. Why did they not wait until it became evident that it was 5 lads pilfering diesel before reporting it as terror?</em></p>
<p><em>Here in &#8220;evidence-land&#8221; we try to ignore the noise and report the truth. And the truth is that the mainstream media has blood on its hands, a lot of blood. Its failure to address the exaggerated claims of the October 7 Hamas attacks &#8212; 40 babies beheaded, mass gang rapes, babies in ovens, babies on clotheslines &#8212; has given licence to genocide, to the worst human atrocities of this century.</em></p>
<p><em>Lies have dragged us into war against Iran which is hurting every citizen via higher petrol and food prices.</em></p>
<p><em>The effect on humanity has been drastic, and much of that can be foisted home to a failure by a craven media to report responsibly. The media is culpable and the rise of new media such as MWM is due to plunging public confidence in the institutions of power such as the ABC and traditional corporate media.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_457323" class="wp-caption">
<p><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/flying-high-dubai-mwm-responds-to-abc-media-watch/attachment/false-flag/" rel="attachment wp-att-457323"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://michaelwest.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/false-flag.png" alt="The other X post in question " width="600" height="605" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-457323" /></a></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-457323" class="wp-caption-text">The other X post in question</p>
</div>
<p><em>We haven’t grown from scratch to millions in audience a month by making stuff up.</em></p>
<p><em>To be fair, the ABC has done better than corporate media but it is still culpable. Where is the </em>Four Corners<em> on the </em>hasbara<em> movement, the litany of false flag attacks in Australia such as the Dural caravan hoax and the other 12 or so &#8220;terror&#8221; acts which turned out to be no-hopers with no political ideology apparently paid for by foreign interests?</em></p>
<p><em>This is the real story, the culpability of media in genocide, not some guy on X raising credible doubts about the official narrative because the evidence for terror claims does not stack up and the historical evidence of false flags is so compelling it should not be ignored.</em></p>
<p><em>As we approach the three-year anniversary of October 7, it would be apposite for traditional media to contemplate its own epic failures, its complicity in the genocide in Gaza. You could start by analysing the lies which have already been debunked.</em></p>
<p><em>Here are some questions: how many Israelis were slaughtered by IDF Apache gunships on October 7? Why did Netanyahu ignore warnings of the Hamas attacks from Egyptian and Qatari leaders? What is the evidence for mass rapes and babies beheaded? How and why were the Nova Festival arrangements changed prior to the attacks? Why has there been no official inquiry by Israeli authorities?</em></p>
<p><em>And what role did the mainstream media play to give licence to genocide?</em></p>
<p><em>Cui bono</em>?</p>
<p><strong>Media Watch email<br />
</strong><em>Thanks for your time on the phone just now. Here’s what I sent via your website portal. </em></p>
<p><em>We’re writing an item examining the FlyDubai incident, which has been widely reported this week, where passengers managed to seize control of a 737 en route to Tel Aviv from Dubai. As part of that story, we are examining the conspiracy theories that have cropped up online, and we noticed you have been posting about this being a “false flag” operation.</em></p>
<p><em>There was <a href="https://x.com/TheLongInvest/status/2105734670457676170?s=20">this repost</a> in particular: </em></p>
<p><em>But also <a href="https://x.com/MichaelWestBiz/status/2105521085513073082?s=20">this</a>:</em></p>
<p><em>We may mention this in the segment. To my knowledge, there is no evidence this was an Israeli “false flag”, and theories like this are unsubstantiated.</em></p>
<p><em>Questions below:</em></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1"><em>Do you believe this incident was an Israeli Government “false flag” event? If so, on what basis? If not, how do you explain your posts above?</em></li>
<li aria-level="1"><em>Perpetuating unsubstantiated conspiracy theories like this, especially from an established journalist such as yourself, can help spread misinformation. Your post likely contributed to this. What is your response?</em></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Deadline is 5pm today.  Let me know if you are having trouble reaching this.</em></p>
<p><strong> &#8216;Cheap 20 second opinions&#8217;<br />
</strong>When the <a href="https://x.com/ABCmediawatch/status/2107055642968261095">show aired</a> last night, host Linton Besser didn’t hold back on the accusations of peddling conspiracy theories and “cheap 20 second opinions”.</p>
<p>We concede that in the absence of ABC’s $1.23 billion budget &#8212; even a dedicated team of researchers and others working for an entire week to produce 15 minutes of television for just 42 weeks of the year &#8212; that we may be cheap, at least in budget terms, by necessity.</p>
<p>Yet with our humble budget and the goodwill of the community we have managed to break a lot more stories than the ABC in relation to the crime of the century. Where is the ABC’s coverage of Australian charities funnelling money to the IDF and illegal West Bank settlements?</p>
<blockquote><p>Nowhere, despite it being raised in Parliament.</p></blockquote>
<p>Where is the coverage of <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/lone-soldiers-new-australian-idf-recruits-due-to-arrive-in-israel-in-january/">Australians serving with the IDF,</a> a story we <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/lips-are-sealed-on-australians-fighting-for-the-israel-defense-forces-in-gaza/">broke with FOIs</a>? Where is the coverage of the <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/wheres-the-money-government-and-israel-lobby-coy-on-big-grants/">money trail</a> of public grants to the Israel lobby?</p>
<p>We even beat this billion-dollar corporation on the story of Australian UN commissioner, Chris Sidoti, releasing an independent report for the UN on the systematic slaughter of Palestinian children by the IDF. We were <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/un-report-finds-israel-deliberately-targets-palestinian-children/">literally first media in the world</a>.</p>
<p>The ABC trundled along timidly a day late with its billion-dollar budget and, typically, buried the story anyway. <a href="https://x.com/MichaelWestBiz/status/2069330395448099075">This</a> &#8212; an investigation about a rogue state engaged in genocide which Australia furnishes with weapons parts, to be found by the highest body in the world, to be deliberately murdering children.</p>
<blockquote><p>Shamelessly buried.</p></blockquote>
<p>And here they are with the gall, to sermonise about an independent journalist saying on social media that flydubai was “probably” a false flag or at least had been leveraged for political advantage. This, after three years of spinelessly tip-toeing around every single story which mentions the word Israel.</p>
<p>As Media Watch host, my former <em>SMH</em> colleague, and a first-rate journalist, Linton Besser did note in his piece, Benjamin Netanyahu was very quick out of the blocks when the story broke to get on the phone to Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News to kick off his media campaign.</p>
<p>With zero evidence Israel’s PM pointed the bone at Iran. Was Iran directly behind the plot, asked career misinformation-spreader Sean Hannity? “Too early to say,&#8221; said Netanyahu. Job done, as with the RAF Fairford “terror plot”, Iran named. The rest of the corporate media followed.</p>
<p>This is the way it works and ABC is a part of it. “Israel says”. Frothing forth with every false claim uttered by a war lobby whose lies are established and far too prolific to list here. They are daily.</p>
<p><strong>Is flydubai a false flag?<br />
</strong>Is the flydubai incident a false flag? It’s too early to tell but the narrative has changed a lot, the evidence suggests the official story is not credible, even <a href="https://x.com/ProudSocialist/status/2105767295691984998">CNN had a pilot demonstrate</a> why it did not stack up. <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/4/what-are-the-five-questions-being-asked-regarding-the-flydubai-attack">Many questions remain</a>.</p>
<p>“This is Hollywood on steroids … ordinary civilians became superheroes,” Netanyahu told Fox News. “If you’re next hijacked, make sure an Israeli is sitting next to you.”</p>
<p>Is not the story &#8212; the story for <em>Media Watch</em> &#8212; why are so many sceptical about Israel’s claims? The answer is clear: they lie and twist facts relentlessly. The suspicion is warranted. The propaganda is documented. Why does ABC not cover that, bigger, story?</p>
<p>Our personal favourite was the still glass of water after the 14,300 ft nosedive (no, not the heroic plumber who watched aviation rescue shows or the pilot, Hamam al Hamami, whose name has been translated by scallywags as Bathroom King of Bathrooms).</p>
<div id="attachment_457440" class="wp-caption">
<p><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/flying-high-dubai-mwm-responds-to-abc-media-watch/attachment/glass-of-water/" rel="attachment wp-att-457440"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://michaelwest.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/glass-of-water.png" alt="Image X, unverified" width="600" height="451" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-457440" /></a></p>
<p id="caption-attachment-457440" class="wp-caption-text">Image X, unverified</p>
</div>
<p>Why does the ABC continue to trot out the Israel lobby’s propaganda when it has been proven time and time again to be false? The mainstream media has literally, deliberately missed the story of the century.</p>
<blockquote><p>They avoid the G-word like the plague.</p></blockquote>
<p>And this cowardice, this complicity by our institutions of power, has degraded all humanity. Our leaders and our institutions, in not standing up to genocide, in perpetuating lies, even rewarding them, have let us all down.</p>
<p>At least we said “probably” a false flag. They can’t even bring themselves &#8212; with all their sanctimonious tut-tutting about journalistic integrity to say “probably a genocide”, let alone admit they’ve been captured to the point of even <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/antoinette-lattouf-v-abc-the-west-report/">sacking at least one journalist</a> for raising the question.</p>
<p>Just look at the pictures. Gaza razed by US bombs, a population starved and tortured, homeless, 70,000 to 700,000 dead, concentration camps, the largest population of child amputees in history.</p>
<p>You allowed this to happen.</p>
<p><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/flying-high-dubai-mwm-responds-to-abc-media-watch/attachment/g-a/" rel="attachment wp-att-457438"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://michaelwest.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/g-a.jpeg" alt="" width="600" height="600" /></a><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/michael/"> Michael West</a> established Michael West Media in 2016 to focus on journalism of high public interest, particularly the rising power of corporations over democracy. West was formerly a journalist and editor with Fairfax newspapers, a columnist for News Corp and even, once, a stockbroker. This article was first published by <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/">Michael West Media</a> on 6 October 2026 and is republished with permission.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jale Moala: Words matter in politics, especially at a time like this in Fiji</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/06/jale-moala-words-matter-in-politics-especially-at-a-time-like-this-in-fiji/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divine guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FijiFirst Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multifaith nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siromi Turaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Jale Moala Words matter in politics. They matter even more when a country is debating the document that will determine how it is governed. That is why remarks by Justice Minister and Acting Attorney-General Siromi Turaga about Fiji&#8217;s constitutional review deserve some thought. Speaking about the journey that has brought the government to ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Jale Moala</em></p>
<p>Words matter in politics. They matter even more when a country is debating the document that will determine how it is governed.</p>
<p>That is why remarks by Justice Minister and Acting Attorney-General Siromi Turaga about Fiji&#8217;s constitutional review deserve some thought.</p>
<p>Speaking about the journey that has brought the government to this point, Turaga repeatedly invoked God.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/23/sweeping-changes-to-fijis-governance-recommended-by-constitution-commission/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Sweeping changes to Fiji’s governance recommended by Constitution Commission</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Fiji+constitution">Other Fiji constitution reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>“We got here through the miracle of God,” he said.</p>
<p>He spoke of people fasting and of prayer groups, including people who had travelled from Nadi and were praying at his office.</p>
<p>Then came perhaps the most striking part of his remarks when he recalled that the government had initially failed to secure the parliamentary numbers required for constitutional change and had then gone to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>“We thought we didn&#8217;t have the numbers, but God worked in a different way,” he said.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;We got the numbers&#8217;</strong><br />
He then referred to what happened to FijiFirst: &#8220;They were deregistered . . . we got the numbers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing unusual about a Christian politician expressing his faith. Fiji is a deeply religious country, and Christians are entitled to pray. So are Hindus and Muslims.</p>
<p>While those holding public office do not surrender their religious beliefs when they walk through the doors of Parliament or a government office, there is a difference between seeking God&#8217;s guidance and appearing to attribute a political outcome to divine intervention.</p>
<p>FijiFirst was deregistered on July 1, 2024, by the Registrar of Political Parties after failing to make required amendments to its party constitution within the prescribed period. That was an administrative and legal process.</p>
<p>Yet Turaga&#8217;s description places that development within a striking sequence:</p>
<ul>
<li>The government did not have the numbers;</li>
<li>People prayed;</li>
<li>“God worked in a different way”;</li>
<li>FijiFirst was deregistered; and</li>
<li>The government got the numbers.</li>
</ul>
<p>Again, language matters when it comes from someone exercising considerable political and legal authority, and especially now, as Fiji considers fundamental changes to its supreme law.</p>
<p>A Christian should be able to support or oppose the proposed Constitution. So should a Hindu. So should a Muslim. So should someone who follows another faith or professes no religion at all.</p>
<p><strong>Faith and political validation</strong><br />
And this is where Turaga&#8217;s words raise a difficult question: when does personal faith become political validation?</p>
<p>If a political leader suggests that God intervened to produce the parliamentary circumstances necessary to advance constitutional change, what message does that send to those who disagree with the changes?</p>
<p>And whose God was Turaga talking about? Whose faith?</p>
<p>When a cabinet minister speaks of God intervening in a political process, Christians may understand those words through their own faith. Yet Fiji&#8217;s Constitution does not belong to Christians alone. It belongs to the Hindu family in Labasa, the Muslim family in Ba, the Christian family in Lau and the citizen who believes in no God at all.</p>
<p>The legitimacy of a Constitution governing a democratic, multifaith nation must come from something shared by all its citizens &#8212; their consent to the system that governs them.</p>
<p>Again, words matter, especially at a time like this. Therefore, those entrusted with political power should choose their words carefully.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Jale+Moala">Jale Moala</a>, one of Fiji’s most experienced and talented journalists, has been editor of The Fiji Times, Fiji Daily Post, Islands Business, Pacific Islands Monthly, night editor of The National daily newspaper in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, and a senior journalist on several New Zealand news media. This commentary is republished from his Facebook page with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The school that became a grave&#8217; &#8211; Jeremy Scahill on US bombing of Minab, killing 120+ Iranian kids</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/10/03/the-school-that-became-a-grave-jeremy-scahill-on-us-bombing-of-minab-killing-120-iranian-kids/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombing of schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy Now!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Scahill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[killing of children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massacre at Minab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minab atrocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minab war crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missile attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Democracy Now! AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, I’m Amy Goodman. We’re broadcasting from Publix, the House of Journalism in Berlin, Germany. The Pentagon is sending a third aircraft carrier to the Middle East as President Trump considers a new escalation of the US war on Iran. The latest move adds 7000 sailors, up to ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.democracynow.org/"><em>Democracy Now!</em></a></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: This is <a href="https://www.democracynow.org/">Democracy Now!</a>, I’m Amy Goodman. We’re broadcasting from Publix, the House of Journalism in Berlin, Germany.</em></p>
<p><em>The Pentagon is sending a third aircraft carrier to the Middle East as President Trump considers a new escalation of the US war on Iran. The latest move adds 7000 sailors, up to 3000 Marines, to the US military presence in the region.</em></p>
<p><em>Today, we look at the US bombing of a children’s school in the southern Iranian city of Minab on the first day of the 2026 US-Israeli war on Iran. The bombing killed at least 156 people &#8212; 120 of them children, 26 teachers, all women. A United Nations fact-finding mission recently concluded the US strike was a war crime, but the Trump administration has not yet even acknowledged US responsibility.</em></p>
<p><em>Drop Site News is out this week with a devastating investigation into the bombing of the school. The <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/minab-school-massacre-iran-war-children-families">article</a> and accompanying <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OmK0oeq5fc">video</a> is headlined “Massacre at Minab: The School That Became a Grave.” We’re joined right now by investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill, lead author on the report.</em></p>
<p><em>In a moment, Jeremy, we’ll play some of your interviews with survivors, first responders and parents. But first, Jeremy, set up what happened that day on February 28.</em></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6EuLs76P21k?si=oExRuVaanT8LuFs8" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>&#8216;The school that became a grave.&#8217;                    Video: Democracy Now!</em></p>
<p><em>JEREMY SCAHILL: </em>Thanks, Amy.</p>
<p>You know, we need to back up a few weeks and remember that Iran and the United States were engaged in an intense round of negotiations that were being mediated by the Sultanate of Oman, which had been the main mediator for two decades between the United States and Iran on nuclear issues and had played a major role in brokering the 2015 JCPOA agreement signed under Barack Obama.</p>
<p>And the Iranians were very sceptical about this process, because just some months before these negotiations, in June of 2025, when the Iranians were negotiating with the United States, the US and Israel launched surprise bombing attacks against Iran in what became known as the 12-Day War.</p>
<p>But the foreign minister of Oman, on February 27, had gone to the United States. He met with Vice-President JD Vance in the White House. He came out, and he told media that he was optimistic that a deal was going to be reached and that it would be historic in nature &#8212; yes, there were details to work out; nothing was guaranteed &#8212; but that there were technical talks scheduled for the following week in Vienna, Austria.</p>
<p>And so, when Iranians woke up on the morning of February 28, let’s remember this was a Saturday, but in Iran, Saturday is the beginning of the school and workweek, and so Iranians were, you know, paying attention to everything, but they went to bed understanding that this process was still going on, that war was very much a possibility, but not believing it was going to start imminently, because you had this next round of negotiations and you had the Omani foreign minister expressing optimism.</p>
<p>Well, then, as people are stuck in traffic jams, they’re getting their kids out the door for school, children start arriving at school, we get the initial reports that there are airstrikes that have happened in Tehran, the capital of Iran. And the first strikes that happened that day were on the residence and offices of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and so a lot of the media speculation at that point was about whether or not Iran’s supreme leader had been assassinated.</p>
<p>And word starts to spread very quickly across Iran and on state media that there are attacks happening throughout the country. And so, administrators and officials in provinces around Iran begin calling schools and directing principals and teachers to start having parents come to take their children home. There was going to be a shelter-in-place order.</p>
<p>The Iranians had been through this before.</p>
<p>So, as this is happening, we then start to hear shocking reports that in the southern Iranian city of Minab, a missile has slammed into a girls’ school, and we start to see images that show children and the bodies of children. And very quickly, the media narrative sort of becomes &#8212; and this is being pushed kind of by the United States &#8212; that the school had been right next to an IRGC missile facility and that it was sort of collateral damage.</p>
<p>We did an investigation into this. There’s been some very good reporting on this. This is not a story that we broke. But what we did is we really went deeply into what happened in the experience of Iranians who lived it that day, and by talking to teachers who survived. You know, 26 teachers were killed in this attack &#8212; one of them was pregnant &#8212; 120 children.</p>
<p>This was not a single bombing or collateral damage. There were at least two direct hits on a school packed with children. That was with Tomahawk cruise missiles, one of the most sophisticated weapons in the US arsenal. And a couple of hours after those initial hits, as first responders came, as parents came, the US launches more strikes.</p>
<p>A total, Iran says, of 13 missiles were launched. The justice minister of Iran told me, “This isn’t a double-tap &#8212; a double-tap strike; this is a triple-tap strike.”</p>
<p>You know, one of the most horrifying details, Amy, that we uncovered is that after the first bomb had hit near the school that morning, the teachers didn’t believe that their school would be bombed, because it was a school, and they had gathered the children, many of the children, in the schoolyard because their parents had come to pick them up.</p>
<p>And when the bombs hit not far away from the school, they said, “My god, we need to get everyone back into the school.” So they ushered the children back into the school. One of the teachers took some of the girls into a prayer hall inside of the school, and then, moments later, direct hit with a Tomahawk cruise missile on the school.</p>
<p>So, the protected site of the school, the parents and the teachers thought that they would find shelter there, and the United States directly bombed that school while they were inside.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Jeremy, I want to go to the voices of the people themselves. This is an excerpt of your Drop Site News new <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/minab-school-massacre-iran-war-children-families">investigation</a>, “Massacre at Minab: The School That Became a Grave,” featuring interviews with Yaghoub Yazdanpanah. His daughter Fatemeh died in the strike. But first, this is preschool teacher Hossniyeh Salem. She survived the bombing.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>HOSSNIYEH SALEM:</strong> [translated] Like any other day, I got my child ready at 7:00, because my son is in fifth grade and attended the same school. I got my child ready and headed to school.</p>
<p>My son went to the boys’ school, and I stayed at preschool in my own class. Our school had two floors. The upper floor was for the girls, and the downstairs was for the boys.</p>
<p>One section was for preschool. You can say there were three schools there. There were students there from all walks of life, children from working-class families, educators. We had all kinds of students there.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>YAGHOUB YAZDANPANAH:</strong> [translated] I have to go back a little and tell you about how I chose this school. Fatemeh’s mother and I had noticed Fatemeh’s overflowing intelligence. When we would tell her a story, she would never forget the story, and she would recite the story moment by moment, word for word.</p>
<p>I wanted to find a very good school that would address Fatemeh’s needs and her active mind. After asking a lot of questions, I found Shajareh Tayyebeh School.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>HOSSNIYEH SALEM:</strong> [translated] After the lesson started, we handed out books, and the children did their activities. I took the children to the schoolyard, the park that was in our schoolyard, so the children could play. The time was around 9:30, I think, when I was informed by a friend that the war had started and they had hit Tehran.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>JEREMY SCAHILL:</strong> In the first moments of the US and Israeli bombing campaign, they strike the personal residence and offices of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran. And they killed, assassinated not only Khamenei, but members of his family.</p>
<p>They start then striking other leadership targets of the IRGC, the elite military force of Iran; political offices in Iran; government ministries in Iran. And word starts to spread all across the country that this isn’t just like a one-off airstrike, that this does seem to, in fact, be a full-scale war.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>HOSSNIYEH SALEM:</strong> [translated] Administrators said there are war conditions, and it’s better if the children go home early. We didn’t have a single thought or didn’t imagine that they may want to hit our school.</p>
<p>In complete calm and relaxation, we were calling families and telling them to come and take their children. As they were coming to get the kids, a number of the children had left, and some were still at the school. I first heard the sound of an explosion.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>ON-SCREEN TEXT:</strong> After a missile strike nearby, some teachers ushered children back inside the school for protection.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>HOSSNIYEH SALEM:</strong> [translated] The preschool children were 5 years old, and all they did was yell, “Miss! Miss!” and were crying. I ran to the children. I just said, “Get under the table!” I didn’t think they were going to hit the school. I just thought that someplace had been hit. I said, “Don’t be afraid. Sit down.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I heard this horrible sound, and it was so close, two simultaneous sounds. They’re still in my ear. My son even describes them.</p>
<p>“Woosh, boom! Woosh, boom!” And then explosion. Plaster was falling. The ground was shaking. And at that moment, I just looked at my preschool girls and my son, and I said to myself, “It’s over. Now is the time when we go under the rubble. It’s going to fall now.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Then there were no more sounds. The class was full of smoke and dust. I told my son, “Yassin, run and open the door. Let’s get out!” My preschool kids didn’t have shoes on since our classroom was carpeted. I took the children in my arms, one by one, and brought them outside. We exited from the preschool yard gate until we reached the first street.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I looked behind me, and I saw smoke and fire coming from the school office. All I said to the preschool children was, “Kids, just look in front of you. Don’t look back!”</p>
<p>I told everyone to run to the school because they had hit the school. “The children are under the ruins. Go save them!”</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: That’s an excerpt from Drop Site News’ new <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/minab-school-massacre-iran-war-children-families">investigation</a>, “Massacre at Minab: The School That Became a Grave.” That was preschool teacher Hossniyeh Salem. She survived the bombing. In this clip, we hear more from Yaghoub Yazdanpanah, who describes how he raced to the school to look for his little daughter Fatemeh.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>YAGHOUB YAZDANPANAH:</strong> [translated] It was like something was telling my heart that the school they were talking about was Shajareh Tayyebeh. I lost it. I left my classroom, ran home, took my car and sped to Minab.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>When I arrived, I said, “Oh no!” The unimaginable had happened. As soon as I arrived there, I saw there was no school left. Two-thirds of the school, maybe more, had been destroyed.</p>
<p>Smoke was rising from all over the school. It had turned into rubble. For a moment, I thought I was asleep and having a nightmare.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: In this excerpt from Drop Site News’ new <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/minab-school-massacre-iran-war-children-families">investigation</a>, “Massacre at Minab: The School That Became a Grave,” we hear two Iranian Red Crescent Society emergency workers describing the utter devastation following the US strike on the Minab school.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>EHSAN MOHSEN:</strong> [translated] Mothers came to me and said, “My daughter is in the classroom,” “My son is in the classroom. In God’s name, please bring me my son.”</p>
<p>We didn’t know how to answer these families. Each body part that was brought out from the building and taken to the ambulances, the families ran, looking to see who it was.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>YAGHOUB YAZDANPANAH:</strong> [translated] People kept coming and coming to help, to remove children from under the ruins. All of us were there waiting. I, a 32-year-old father, was waiting for them to bring my daughter from under the ruins. Imagine the depth of this catastrophe and how hard it was for us.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>MAJID DADANIA:</strong> [translated] There was a father with us who was searching for his two children until it was 4:00 or 5:00 at night, when his fingers no longer worked. His fingers were covered in blood. He had lost his fingernails. In that same condition, he fell asleep.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>There was also a father — we had nothing to give him. All that remained was a school bag and shoes. Where we had collected the school bag and shoes, the father sat and was talking to the school bag and shoes.</p>
<p>He was just talking to the school bag and shoes. Nothing from his child has been recovered.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Again, those are two Red Crescent workers, an excerpt of Drop Site News’ new <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/minab-school-massacre-iran-war-children-families">investigation</a>, “Massacre at Minab: The School That Became a Grave.”</em></p>
<p><em>In March, President Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth denied the US was responsible for bombing the school. They spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>REPORTER:</strong> Did the United States bomb a girls’ elementary school in southern Iran on the first day of the war and kill 175 people?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP:</strong> No, in my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>REPORTER:</strong> Is that true, Mr. Hegseth, that it was Iran who did that?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>DEFENCE SECRETARY PETE HEGSETH:</strong> We’re certainly investigating.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>REPORTER:</strong> Still investigating?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>DEFENSE SECRETARY PETE HEGSETH:</strong> But the only — the only side that targets civilians is Iran.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP:</strong> We think it was done — we think it was done by Iran.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: That was Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Trump. In July, President Trump told a different story, appearing on Fox News, talking about the airstrike.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>TREY YINGST:</strong> There are images from this site that show fragments that appear to be from US Tomahawk missiles. Is it possible that old intelligence or a mistake during a very active time in the war led to this event?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP:</strong> It is, but it’s also possible that those images that you have are AI-generated. … Now, I know we’re waiting for a conclusive report. I don’t think there can be a conclusive report.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Oh, really? So, that’s President Trump talking about the report. Jeremy Scahill, you are the co-founder of Drop Site News. This is an incredible <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/minab-school-massacre-iran-war-children-families">investigation</a>, “Massacre at Minab.” Can you respond to what Hegseth and Trump said? And talk about the state of the investigation into this deadly attack on the schools, February 28, that killed over 150 people, as you said, 120 of them children.</em></p>
<p><em>JEREMY SCAHILL:</em> Amy, I think there’s only two possibilities here for what actually happened that day. On the one hand, it’s possible that because Pete Hegseth came in with a tone set by Trump himself that civilian deaths don’t matter, that soldiers and military personnel should not worry about killing or injuring civilians, that they eliminated the entire department that is supposed to do civilian harm mitigation, that they used AI, including Maven systems developed by Palantir, to rush to develop as many targets as possible, that they had old satellite photos that indicated that this was a military base and not a school, and that because of that disregard for civilians and civilian life, they pushed forward and said, “We want to break records&#8221;.</p>
<p>They’re always talking about records &#8212; “and maximised lethality.” And so, it was a process where they didn’t care, and they just started striking everything.</p>
<p>On the flip side of it &#8212; and, you know, a former senior State Department official told me this &#8212; knowing what she knows about the entire system and the fact that this was struck in the first hours of the first day of this war that they had been planning, that something very sinister may well be at the core of this.</p>
<p>So, you know, it’s important to say, up until the year 2013, this was &#8212; this area in Minab was actually a facility that was operated by the IRGC. We obtained documents, and the satellite photos also show this clearly, showing that in 2014 the school filed for registration.</p>
<p>The IRGC donated the land. The province redistricted the whole area, and the IRGC actually moved most of its facilities more than 3 km away. That base, which was a publicly known base, was not hit during these attacks that morning. Instead, it was an area that was a school, a car wash, a clinic &#8212; what we would call in America a strip mall &#8212; and the only remaining IRGC building in that vicinity was an administrative office of the naval forces of the IRGC, and they had totally vacated that property after the June 2025 war.</p>
<p>So, what happened that day was there was literally no presence of the IRGC whatsoever there. And in fact, satellite photos from just weeks &#8212; that the public can see &#8212; from just weeks before the strike, you could see the murals on the wall. You could see the soccer field. Some of the satellite photos show shadows of tiny people playing outside.</p>
<p>I spoke to Wes Bryant, who used to be one of the people in charge of civilian harm mitigation at the Pentagon up until 2025. His division was the one that Hegseth shut down. And he said that under the rules in the doctrine, they should have checked the most readily available satellite imagery before launching any strike of that nature. The other thing is, Tomahawk cruise missiles have cameras on them. They can loiter. They can shift direction.</p>
<p>So, there are many, many questions that need to be asked about this.</p>
<p>This is one of the single gravest war crimes that I’m aware of since Vietnam. It’s akin to the Amariyah shelter bombing in Baghdad, Iraq, in the 1991 Gulf War, when the US dropped a bomb, a bunker buster bomb, ripped open a hole in a bunker where hundreds of civilians were, and then dropped another 2000-pound bomb directly, incinerating more than 400 people. It rises to the level of gravity of that crime.</p>
<p>And it’s really just shocking that there isn’t more outcry from the American public and the US Congress. This is one of the most severe war crimes. And it’s not like, you know, the tone under Obama, where he says, “Oh, oops, we tortured some folks,” or they said, you know, “We regret this.”</p>
<p>Trump’s people are defiant about this. And the Democrats, you know, they’re not in control of the Congress right now, but this should be front and center of foreign policy questions toward Donald Trump. If the Democrats regain control of the House of Representatives, they should go after them for this. These are war crimes.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Has any &#8212; has any investigation been done by the US government, made public?</em></p>
<p><em>JEREMY SCAHILL: </em>No, the United States Central Command is supposedly doing an investigation, but Bradley Cooper, the head of CENTCOM, lied in front of Congress and said this was an active IRGC missile base. There’s no evidence to suggest that there ever were missiles launched from this site. And this was congressional testimony.</p>
<p>It seems like the best-case scenario is that they kind of say this was human error, artificial intelligence and outdated maps, because the threat was so serious, and we moved forward, and, oops, this was a mistake. That would be the best-case scenario.</p>
<p>The worst-case scenario, in some ways, is that Trump’s people and the Pentagon just simply say, “Oh, no, this is Iranian propaganda. We still think that maybe the IRGC bombed it themselves.”</p>
<p>That’s why it’s so important to have actual investigations. The UN sent a commission there, and they’ve determined that it’s a war crime, just on the basis of the idea that if they used AI, if they used systems where they shut down the civilian harm mitigation and they didn’t check to see what was there before they launched the missile, that satisfies the legal barriers to indicate that a war crime, not just a crime against humanity, was committed.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Jeremy, we just have 20 seconds, but the devastating pictures of &#8212; I mean, the victims are not only those who’ve died, but the children that survived, that are saying to their parents, “I wish I had been one of the martyred to be with my friends.” These last 20 seconds, the effect today?</em></p>
<p><em>JEREMY SCAHILL: You know, one of the drawings from the psychologist, a child just drew a severed hand. And she said, you know, that the kids feel like they did something wrong, that they don’t understand why their friends died and they weren’t able to save them.</em></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Jeremy, we have to leave it there. It is an incredibly devastating report. Jeremy is co-founder of Drop Site News. We’ll link to your new <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/minab-school-massacre-iran-war-children-families">investigation</a> and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OmK0oeq5fc">film</a>, “Massacre at Minab: The School That Became a Grave.”</em></p>
<p><em>The original content of this programme is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence</a>. Republished by Asia Pacific Report under Creative Commons.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Resistance to the Ponsonby People’s Union, a courageous tale of struggle for justice</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/29/from-resistance-to-the-ponsonby-peoples-union-a-courageous-tale-of-struggle-for-justice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza Freedom Flotilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-war protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliff Kelsall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory Military Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conscripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyn Doherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine Human Rights Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polynesian Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponsonby People's Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resistance Bookshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolutionary intercommunalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Fowler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waiouru military camp]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[REVIEW: By David Robie The seeds of resistance and later community empowerment began in Tāmaki Makaurau in a humble but lively bookshop in a rundown two-storeyed shop at 436 Queen Street. Called the Resistance Bookshop, it became the headquarters for protesters in 1969 for three years as anti-Vietnam War action grew and grew. This was ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>REVIEW:</strong> <em>By David Robie</em></p>
<p>The seeds of resistance and later community empowerment began in Tāmaki Makaurau in a humble but lively bookshop in a rundown two-storeyed shop at 436 Queen Street. Called the Resistance Bookshop, it became the headquarters for protesters in 1969 for three years as anti-Vietnam War action grew and grew.</p>
<p>This was where many students, workers and radicals gathered &#8212; including the young Roger Fowler &#8212; to plan their protest action. Many of them lived in dilapidated inner-city flats within a stone’s throw of the bookshop.</p>
<p>As the anti-war movement gained momentum, many young men faced conscription into the New Zealand army and there were fears that conscripts would be drafted to fight in Vietnam &#8212; as was their fate in the United States and Australia.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Roger+Fowler"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Roger Fowler reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Fowler, an icon of Aotearoa protest and community empowerment, recalled how those men whose “number came up” in the archaic Compulsory Military Training (CMT) “lottery law” were ordered to report to a special train at Auckland Railway Station.</p>
<p>They were “transported to the Waiouru army camp to endure a harsh, three-month course of military training plus follow-up camps,” wrote Fowler.</p>
<p>“My number was drawn and I refused to go; instead burning my draft card at a demonstration at the US Consul’s Paritai Drive mansion.</p>
<p>“I organised a protest at the railway station, where fellow Resistance supporters and I handed out leaflets, encouraging the young conscripts on the train to disembark and refuse to go.</p>
<p>“I was later arrested for refusing to attend the army call-up, then locked up in Mt Eden prison for about three weeks for refusing the pay the fine.”</p>
<p>Fowler recalled that this period of “defiant non-compliance” by conscripts led to the founding of the Organisation to Halt Military Service (OHMS). Eventually, the pressure paid off when the Norman Kirk-led Labour government was elected in November 1972 &#8212; and it immediately scrapped CMT.</p>
<p>This saga is one of many stories of the people’s resistance that are recounted in a new book being launched next Saturday, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/events/1464548552476588/"><em>Ponsonby People’s Union: At the Frontline of Community Activism in the 1970s</em></a>, with an overview written by Roger Fowler in the months before he died earlier this year. Many activists from the era, including his wife and fellow campaigner, Dr Lyn Doherty (Ngati Porou and Ngāpuhi), have also contributed.</p>
<p><strong>Arrested 20 times</strong><br />
He was arrested or charged more than 20 times “during those turbulent years”, and was imprisoned four times for refusing to pay fines &#8212; a political prisoner.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134207" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134207" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134207" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-jailed-Food-coop-Earwig-680wide.jpg" alt="A report of PU’s Roger Fowler – pictured here working on food co-op orders" width="680" height="486" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-jailed-Food-coop-Earwig-680wide.jpg 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-jailed-Food-coop-Earwig-680wide-300x214.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-jailed-Food-coop-Earwig-680wide-100x70.jpg 100w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-jailed-Food-coop-Earwig-680wide-588x420.jpg 588w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134207" class="wp-caption-text">A report of PU’s Roger Fowler – pictured here working on food co-op orders – being jailed for opposing militarism. Image: Earwig Magazine</figcaption></figure>
<p>Reading about this period was particularly poignant for me because in 1969 I was living in Melbourne as the young activist editor of the independent <em>Sunday Observer</em> and being threatened with prosecution for writing an editorial urging young Australians to burn their draft cards.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134210" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134210" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134210 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ponsonby-Peoples-Union-cover-300tall.jpg" alt="Ponsonby People's Union cover" width="300" height="385" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ponsonby-Peoples-Union-cover-300tall.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ponsonby-Peoples-Union-cover-300tall-234x300.jpg 234w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134210" class="wp-caption-text">The Ponsonby People&#8217;s Union book cover &#8211; designed by Kahu Fowler.</figcaption></figure>
<p>I didn’t know Roger, Lyn and their whānau then. This came many years later, especially when we crossed paths over our Palestine activism with Roger founding and campaigning with the Kia Ora Gaza project in a sustained effort to break the cruel Israeli siege of the Gaza enclave to deliver humanitarian aid.</p>
<p>Veteran activist Roger Fowler, co-founder of the Ponsonby People’s Union and a founding member of the Palestine Human Rights Campaign, <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/02/22/roger-fowler-a-legend-of-the-aotearoa-solidarity-movement-dies-at-77/">died on 21 February 2026</a>, aged 77. His whānau have put in tremendous mahi in their effort to try to complete this remarkable book before his death, and it is a compelling testament to his life, and to the comrades and activist supporters.</p>
<p>Fowler’s “vision, energy and guitar helped sustain a remarkable initiative in collective action” for a fairer and better community.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134212" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134212" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134212" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-AnsWestra-p10-680wide.jpg" alt="The Auckland Resistance Bookshop " width="680" height="619" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-AnsWestra-p10-680wide.jpg 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-AnsWestra-p10-680wide-300x273.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-AnsWestra-p10-680wide-461x420.jpg 461w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134212" class="wp-caption-text">The Auckland Resistance Bookshop . . . a centre for political and social justice activism. Image: Ans Westra/Ponsonby People’s Union</figcaption></figure>
<p>Back to the Resistance Bookshop.</p>
<p>In fact, there were three of them – one each in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch. They were at the “forefront of this vibrant groundswell of protest and rebellion”. Young people, including many students, spearheaded new forms of activism such as “sit-ins, street theatre, graffiti, leaflets, protest songs and pickets”.</p>
<p><strong>‘Bowels of the underground’</strong><br />
Countless leaflets and screen-printed posters were produced from what was dubbed “the bowels of the underground”.</p>
<p>Auckland’s Resistance Bookshop was also a popular rendezvous for Australian and US draft dodgers who had fled to New Zealand to escape the Vietnam War.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134213" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134213" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134213 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-p20-graphic-500tall.png" alt="An Auckland Resistance Bookshop flyer" width="500" height="895" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-p20-graphic-500tall.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-p20-graphic-500tall-168x300.png 168w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Resistance-Bookshop-p20-graphic-500tall-235x420.png 235w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134213" class="wp-caption-text">An Auckland Resistance Bookshop flyer. Image: Roger Fowler Collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>The Progressive Youth Movement (PYM) was at the forefront of street protests venting outrage at the pointless slaughter in Vietnam and the “brutal oppression in apartheid South Africa”.</p>
<p>Within walking distance of the Resistance Bookshop &#8212; few protesters had cars back then &#8212; were two popular hangouts: the Babel restaurant in Victoria Street, and the Kiwi Tavern pub in Symonds Street.</p>
<p>The Vietnam War protests peaked with about 35,000 taking part but eased off as NZ troops were gradually withdrawn from 1971 onwards. Committed activists began looking for a fresh “meaningful direction”.</p>
<p>Many of the serious radicals who had left the bookshop formed an inner city Marxist study group exploring works by Mao Zedong and Lenin, and other more modern authors analysing class struggles against capitalism.</p>
<p>“PMY activist and secretary Cliff Kelsall and I became friends and workmates as labourers on various building sites,” wrote Fowler. ”We started exploring ideas about urban activism, especially inspired by the appeal of Huey P. Newton, Bobby Seale and George Jackson to ‘bring the war back home’, by Newton’s concept of grassroots community organising, building a global network of ‘revolutionary intercommunalism’, and by Seale’s clarion call to ‘Seize the time’.”</p>
<p><strong>North Vietnamese meeting</strong><br />
In 1972, a group of the “young radicals” were invited to meet a visiting North Vietnamese delegation, including the mayor of Hanoi, at the Auckland University Student Union building.</p>
<p>“Among issues discussed,” recalled Fowler, “I asked about the idea that had been quietly floating about, of organising an international militia to support the Vietnamese struggle &#8212; similar to the International Brigades that about a dozen young Kiwis had joined up with in the 1930s to fight Franco’s fascists during the Spanish Civil War.”</p>
<p>Several New Zealand medics had volunteered then too, explained Fowler, including the activist and late Invercargill Mayor Tim Shadbolt’s aunt, Rene Shadbolt.</p>
<p>“The startled visitors politely responded: “Thanks, but no thanks.” The Vietnamese suggested that the New Zealanders should instead support their struggle by building a “homegrown revolutionary movement”.</p>
<p>“Advice some of us took to heart,” noted Fowler.</p>
<p>This led to the foundation of an urban movement to organise around “real life struggles and developing survival skills” &#8212; useful for the then working class neighbourhoods of Ponsonby, Grey Lynn, Freeman’s Bay and Newton.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134215" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134215" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134215" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Ponsonby-Shop-RFowler-collection-680wide.jpg" alt="The Ponsonby People’s Union " width="680" height="558" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Ponsonby-Shop-RFowler-collection-680wide.jpg 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Ponsonby-Shop-RFowler-collection-680wide-300x246.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Ponsonby-Shop-RFowler-collection-680wide-512x420.jpg 512w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134215" class="wp-caption-text">The Ponsonby People’s Union . . . headquarters for the food co-op and activism against landlord abuses. Image: Roger Fowler collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>From the Resistance Bookshop, the movement had now graduated to become the Ponsonby People’s Union for Survival and Freedom (PU, for short), with its headquarters at 15 Ponsonby Road in a rundown block of shops skirting Western Park, a block long since demolished to provide more space in the reserve.</p>
<p><strong>‘Clear sense of purpose’</strong><br />
“We decided we needed to start with a clear unified sense of purpose,” wrote Fowler. “A Ten Point Statement of Direction evolved, inspired by the Ten Point Programme adopted earlier by the US Black Panther Party.</p>
<p>“This statement was to become our set of guiding principles for positive practical actions and for addressing the key issues facing our community – such as substandard housing, police harassment, poor education and health services, racism, women’s rights, costly food, arbitrary evictions, and the isolation of prisoners, often in faraway prisons, from their families and loved ones, and advancing social cohesion.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_134219" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134219" style="width: 578px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134219" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-10-Point-statement-p26-680wide.png" alt="Part of the People’s Union 10 Point Statement of Direction" width="578" height="369" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-10-Point-statement-p26-680wide.png 578w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-10-Point-statement-p26-680wide-300x192.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 578px) 100vw, 578px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134219" class="wp-caption-text">Part of the People’s Union 10 Point Statement of Direction. Image: Roger Fowler Collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>As Fowler summed up the problem-solving objective, “we aimed to advance the wellbeing, resilience, social cohesion and survival of our community and to strive for civil liberties and freedom from oppression”.</p>
<p>Although clearly influenced by Newton and the Black Panthers &#8212; but never a “copycat” movement, PU often operated as a “sister organisation” cooperating with the Polynesian Panthers &#8212; of anti-<a href="https://nzhistory.govt.nz/culture/dawn-raids">Dawn Raids</a> fame &#8212; the Communist Party of New Zealand (CPNZ), PYM, Ngā Tamatoa, ACORD and “other left activist groups of the day”.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134220" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134220" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134220" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-in-PPU-shop-RFowlerCollection-title-page-680wide.jpg" alt="Co-founder Roger Fowler doing the mahi in the Ponsonby People’s Union office in Ponsonby Road" width="680" height="507" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-in-PPU-shop-RFowlerCollection-title-page-680wide.jpg 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-in-PPU-shop-RFowlerCollection-title-page-680wide-300x224.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-in-PPU-shop-RFowlerCollection-title-page-680wide-80x60.jpg 80w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-in-PPU-shop-RFowlerCollection-title-page-680wide-265x198.jpg 265w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-in-PPU-shop-RFowlerCollection-title-page-680wide-563x420.jpg 563w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134220" class="wp-caption-text">Co-founder Roger Fowler doing the mahi in the Ponsonby People’s Union office in Ponsonby Road. Image: Roger Fowler Collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>While deciding on PU’s programmes, Cliff Kelsall and Fowler met Polynesian Panthers leaders at their office in Three Lamps, Ponsonby (honoured today with a pavement panther tile), and forged a warm rapport and community partnership that lasted for the seven-year life of the union and beyond. First up for collaboration was a community food co-op.</p>
<p>“We wanted the co-op to engage with people and encourage them to work together as volunteers around the common goal of sustaining our households with fresh, low-cost food,” wrote Fowler.</p>
<p>And the movement introduced itself in 1972 through leaflets as “a community-based group of people getting together to try to solve common problems and build a real community with control over its own destiny”.</p>
<p><strong>Borrowed old trucks</strong><br />
The Ponsonby headquarters had four upstairs bedrooms and a meeting room (plus garage space and a courtyard), so Kelsall and Fowler immediately moved in with others to help pay the rent &#8212; at $15 a week!</p>
<figure id="attachment_134221" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134221" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134221 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Murray-Lee-Susan-Wilson-p33-JMillerPic-500tall.png" alt="Murray Lee and Susan Wilson sorting market produce for the PU food co-op" width="500" height="831" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Murray-Lee-Susan-Wilson-p33-JMillerPic-500tall.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Murray-Lee-Susan-Wilson-p33-JMillerPic-500tall-181x300.png 181w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Murray-Lee-Susan-Wilson-p33-JMillerPic-500tall-253x420.png 253w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134221" class="wp-caption-text">Activists Murray Lee and Susan Wilson sorting market produce for the PU food co-op. Image: John Miller</figcaption></figure>
<p>To get the food co-op underway, the collective borrowed old trucks from their networks, collated food orders and bought fresh vegetables and fruit in bulk from the downtown Turners &amp; Growers markets each Monday morning.</p>
<p>“By cutting out the middlemen, up to half of the retail prices were slashed. And we knew the goods were fresh,” Fowler wrote.</p>
<p>“We would choose to buy – at rock bottom prices – spotted apples and misshapen pumpkins that no retailer wanted on their display shelves.”</p>
<p>The co-op was an ideal platform for supporting other struggles, especially during the 1977 Timber Workers’ Union dispute &#8212; “when we dispatched our truck packed to the roof with donated food to support workers on the picket line at Kawerau”.</p>
<p>The PU also helped about 300 locked out workers at the NZMC Honda car assembly plant and set up a co-op distribution depot at the Panmure Town Hall.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134241" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134241" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134241" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Food-coop-artwork-680wide-.png" alt="Jo Bruce-Smith’s posters for the People’s Union food co-op" width="680" height="360" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Food-coop-artwork-680wide-.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Food-coop-artwork-680wide--300x159.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134241" class="wp-caption-text">Jo Bruce-Smith’s posters for the People’s Union food co-op. Image: Roger Fowler Collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>People’s Union activists carried on taking part in anti-Vietnam War protests and over “other issues of the day”. One of the memorable banners read: “Learn from the Vietnamese &#8212; unite to defeat our common enemies”.</p>
<p><strong>China ‘educational tour’</strong><br />
In 1975, the NZ China Friendship Society facilitated a “workers’ educational tour” of China, which included six People’s Union activists &#8212; including Roger Fowler, his wife Lyn Doherty, and the late mayor Tim Shadbolt of Invercargill: “We visited communal farms, big worksites, and met renowned NZ author Rewi Alley.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was six years before I also &#8212; now living back in Aotearoa after several years in Paris, France, following the 1968 student riots &#8212; went on a Friendship Society visit to China and wrote a series of articles for <em>The Auckland Star.</em></p>
<p>Now as a semi-retired journalist with also strong beliefs about community-owned and independent media, I was heartened to read Roger Fowler’s chapter on the PU’s independent information efforts.</p>
<p>Fowler wrote about this PU initiative saying: “The People’s Union started to attract the interest of some established media, though unlike other left organisations, we never courted the media. We believed it was more important for people to develop our own independent ‘people’s media’.</p>
<p>“However, a journalist from the <em>Women’s Weekly</em> followed the food co-op for her scoop one day and wrote a sympathetic article.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_124087" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-124087" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-124087 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-with-Tigilau-Ness-500tall.png" alt="Polynesian Panther Tigilau Ness and Roger Fowler at the launch of his Resistance album" width="500" height="606" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-with-Tigilau-Ness-500tall.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-with-Tigilau-Ness-500tall-248x300.png 248w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-with-Tigilau-Ness-500tall-347x420.png 347w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-124087" class="wp-caption-text">Polynesian Panther Tigilau Ness and Roger Fowler at the launch of his &#8220;Songs of Struggle and Solidarity&#8221; album in September 2025. Ness recorded his version of Fowler&#8217;s signature song “We Are All Palestinians” here. Image: Asia Pacific Report</figcaption></figure>
<p>In 2016, Roger Fowler and former Polynesian Panther Party members Tigilau Ness and Tuu’ulenana Iluli attended the 50th anniversary of the Black Panther Party in Oakland, California.</p>
<p>In 2025, Fowler and Ness collaborated with a vinyl album, &#8220;<a href="https://www.275times.com/post/songs-of-struggle-solidarity-launch-of-roger-fowler-s-vinyl-lp">Songs of  Struggle and Solidarity&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Prison whānau bus trips</strong><br />
Among the many projects of the PU was in 1972 starting a visitors’ weekly free bus run to Pāremoremo maximum security prison near Albany, and a monthly bus trip to Waikēria Borstal near Te Awamutu.</p>
<p>“These services were very popular, as both prisons were purposely located far away from any viable public transport, making family or community relationships difficult for many,” Fowler wrote.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134222" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134222" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134222" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Paremoremo-bus-p43-JMiller-680wide.png" alt="Passengers on the free People’s Union weekly bus for visitors to Pāremoremo Prison" width="680" height="436" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Paremoremo-bus-p43-JMiller-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Paremoremo-bus-p43-JMiller-680wide-300x192.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Paremoremo-bus-p43-JMiller-680wide-655x420.png 655w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134222" class="wp-caption-text">Passengers on the free People’s Union weekly bus for visitors to Pāremoremo Prison. Image: John Miller</figcaption></figure>
<p>“We once crowded about 80 people into a 55-seater bus to Waikēria. Polynesian Panther Party leader Tigilau Ness brought along his guitar and would get a big singalong going from the back seat – his ‘American Pie’ got everyone joining in the chorus, ‘Bye, Bye, Miss American Pie . . . “</p>
<p>The People’s Union food co-op became a key organising tool and platform, recalled Fowler, for another important “problem solving” programme – defending tenants. The PU centre became the “go-to place for local people facing issues inflicted by rapacious landlords, a major problem that plagued the area”.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134223" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134223" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134223 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-cartoon-bosses-500wide.jpg" alt="“Fight for community control” . . . a cartoon in the People’s Union newspaper" width="500" height="567" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-cartoon-bosses-500wide.jpg 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-cartoon-bosses-500wide-265x300.jpg 265w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Roger-Fowler-cartoon-bosses-500wide-370x420.jpg 370w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134223" class="wp-caption-text">“Fight for community control” . . . a cartoon in the People’s Union newspaper. Cartoon: Roger Fowler Collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>Fowler pays tribute to community activist Betty Wark and her 1976 Tole Street “tent city” occupation of a public park in Ponsonby in protest for “decent housing”.</p>
<p>In a page devoted to her campaigning, Helene Connor is quoted saying; “Housing the homeless and utilising the buildings to their full extent became a passion for Betty. The Tole Street tent ‘village’ kept going for several months while Betty continued to look for suitable accommodation to house the group.”</p>
<p><strong>Vasau family eviction</strong><br />
Fowler recalled “one of our most high-profile housing cases was the eviction of the Vasau family from their home in Norfolk Street, Ponsonby, in 1974”.</p>
<p>“A new owner had told the family to leave their family home of five years, so he could bang the rent up. They had nowhere to go, so had no choice but to stay and fight.</p>
<p>“One day when nobody was home the landlord seized the chance to break in and toss the family’s furniture and belongings outside.”</p>
<p>The People’s Union was called and activists along with neighbours moved the family’s belongings back inside and barricaded the house. Eventually, six months later the landlord returned along with a senior police officer and a court order.</p>
<p>The good news was that the court order along with community support actually helped the family gain a new state house in South Auckland for their home.</p>
<p>Police harassment “was often a problem for some of the people we worked with,” recalled Fowler. A police “task force” would parade through the streets and stop outside local pubs.</p>
<p>“They would intimidate people, usually in an arrogant, racist manner. They called this ‘team policing’, but the People’s Union newspaper compared them to an invading army.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_134224" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134224" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134224" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Maori-Land-March-p62.png" alt="Ōkaihau College student Scotty Alexander, with his bagpipes, took the morning off school to support the Māori Land March in 1975 " width="680" height="446" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Maori-Land-March-p62.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Maori-Land-March-p62-300x197.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Maori-Land-March-p62-640x420.png 640w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134224" class="wp-caption-text">Ōkaihau College student Scotty Alexander, with his bagpipes, took the morning off school to support the Māori Land March in 1975 when it passed his family farm in the Waihou Valley. Lyn Doherty of the Ponsonby People’s Union is front right. Tama Poata is at left, then Ngā Tamatoa members Tiata Witehira and Vern Winitana (checked jacket, holding Kahn’s leash). Image: Christian Heinegg/Ponsonby People&#8217;s Union</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Defining historical event</strong><br />
The Māori Land March in 1975 “was a defining event in the history of Aotearoa &#8212; People’s Union members supported the march in many ways, whether joining with the marchers on the road, feeding them, or supplying the bus so that kaumatua could rest when they needed to”.</p>
<p>Fowler devoted an inspired chapter to the struggle of Takaparawhau&#8211;Bastion Point. On 6 January 1977, Ngāti Whātua’s Ōrākei Action Committee “put out an urgent call for supporters to join a tent protest” at Takaparawhau, Bastion Point.</p>
<p>“The vast area of open fields was under direct threat by the Muldoon government, which intended to develop the land as elite real estate for upmarket housing.”</p>
<p>Fowler quoted Sharon Hawke, one of the protest occupiers and the daughter of Joe Hawke, one of the leaders, declaring in <a href="https://thespinoff.co.nz/books/24-05-2023/takaparawhau-the-peoples-story-of-bastion-point"><em>Takaparawhau, the people’s story</em></a>: “This was to become one of the greatest shows of strength in modern [NZ] history.”</p>
<figure id="attachment_134227" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134227" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-134227" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Bastion-Pt-p66.png" alt="Doc Ngaheu and Roger Fowler (top left) on the lookout on the roof of Arohanui" width="680" height="573" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Bastion-Pt-p66.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Bastion-Pt-p66-300x253.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-Bastion-Pt-p66-498x420.png 498w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134227" class="wp-caption-text">Doc Ngaheu and Roger Fowler (top left) on the lookout on the roof of Arohanui, the whare nui at Bastion Point, during the eviction on 25 May 1978. They set off orange flares as the police convoy arrived (below). Police remove Roger Fowler (top right). Images: Roger Fowler Collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>“The protest camp evolved into a formidable village occupation that stood firm on the disputed land, until evicted by 600 police 506 days later. The uniting catchcry was: ‘Bastion Point is Māori Land’.”</p>
<p>People’s Union activists were there in the protest from the beginning. The land was “unprotected, windswept terrain exposed to the elements which can be very harsh”. The PU advocated the need to build shelters and huts rather than relying on tents. Some people were able to bring on caravans.</p>
<p>Activists from the PU hired a large rotary hoe to help dig vegetable gardens and the protest community rapidly grew into a “living village” &#8212; it was “transformed into a vibrant marae”.</p>
<p>Lyn Doherty and Roger Fowler lived in the protest village “in a little tin shack at the rear of Arohanui [the wharenui] &#8212; cooking toasted sandwiches for breakfast on a small methylated spirits burner each morning”.</p>
<p><strong>Shameful Bastion Point raid</strong><br />
On 25 May 1978, a massive police operation moved to evict and demolish the village. On that fateful morning, 222 Ngāti Whātua and supporters were arrested and all the buildings were demolished and removed in a shameful repressive action by the state.</p>
<p>“But although we lost the battle,” recalled Fowler, “we won the war &#8212; the land remains as public space under Ngāti Whātua control.”</p>
<p>The Ponsonby food co-op grew until about 600 local households were taking part by the end of the 1970s. But the inner Auckland suburbs of Ponsonby and Grey Lynn and their demographics were rapidly changing. Old houses were being sold and renovated as the suburbs were being “gentrified” and rundown shops were being converted into cafes, restaurants and fashion boutiques.</p>
<figure id="attachment_134228" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134228" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134228 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-News-Service-closes-p67-500tall.png" alt="The special final edition in April 1979 of the People’s Union Community Information Service" width="500" height="714" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-News-Service-closes-p67-500tall.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-News-Service-closes-p67-500tall-210x300.png 210w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/PU-News-Service-closes-p67-500tall-294x420.png 294w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134228" class="wp-caption-text">The special final edition in April 1979 of the People’s Union Community Information Service – and of the demise of the PU itself. Roger Fowler Collection</figcaption></figure>
<p>Sadly, the final edition of People’s Union community newspaper in April 1979 announced the closure of the Ponsonby People’s Union, saying “the need for an ‘umbrella’ organisation to coordinate a wide range of community action (from prison visiting to food co-ops) is no longer necessary”.</p>
<p>However, Roger Fowler and whānau expanded their community activism to their new home in Māngere East, where Roger drove buses and was an Engineers Union delegate before managing the Mangere East Community Learning Centre.</p>
<p>In 1999, he was awarded the Queens Service Medal for community service.</p>
<p>Roger and Lyn have four children &#8212; Tawera, Hone, Maia and Kahutia &#8212; and 11 mokopuna.</p>
<p>Besides the book’s overview by Roger Fowler, there are 22 contributed chapters by activists in an 18-page section titled “Other activists’ voices”. This includes essays by Sir Bob Harvey, David Williams, Dr Lyn Doherty (“The shooting of Daniel Houpapa – a gross miscarriage of justice”), Vivian Hutchinson, Wayne Toleafoa, Rod Davis, Reverend Mua Strickson-Pua, Anna and Barry Lee, Catherine Manning (a profile on her mother Pat Hammond), Joris de Bres, Fuimaono Norman Tuiasau, and Tigilau Ness (“A legacy to pass onto our children”).</p>
<p>As well as the historical record of a remarkable era in the 1970s, the book is adorned with a superb gallery of photographs and graphic art. The Fowler whānau have worked extraordinarily hard to bring this publication to fruition after Roger’s death. A labour of love.</p>
<figure id="attachment_124084" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-124084" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-124084" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-whanau-and-friends-680wide.png" alt="Roger Fowler and his wife, Dr Lyn Doherty, with whānau and friends at a community concert" width="680" height="498" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-whanau-and-friends-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-whanau-and-friends-680wide-300x220.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-whanau-and-friends-680wide-80x60.png 80w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Roger-whanau-and-friends-680wide-573x420.png 573w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-124084" class="wp-caption-text">Roger Fowler and his wife, Dr Lyn Doherty, with whānau and friends at an East Mangere community concert in his honour in November 2025. Image: Hone Fowler</figcaption></figure>
<p>Something new that I learned from reading the book is that along with being such an influential activist and strategic organiser, protest entertainer and singer, Roger Fowler was also a gifted political cartoonist. Such extraordinary talent.</p>
<p>In the foreword, Nick Bollinger sums up: “Even though Roger writes in this book that ‘we never considered ourselves as part of a “youth culture” or so-called “alternative counterculture”, when I look back the People’s Union for Survival and Freedom stands out as perhaps the most inspiring application of countercultural ideals. I am very glad its story &#8212; and Roger’s &#8212; is at last being told in these pages.”</p>
<p>And so am I.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.steeleroberts.co.nz"><em>Ponsonby People’s Union: At the Frontline of Community Activism in the 1970s</em></a>, overview by Roger Fowler, and contributors (Steele Roberts), 2026, 102 pages.</li>
<li>Two book launch events: <a href="https://www.eventbrite.co.nz/e/ponsonby-peoples-union-book-launch-tickets-2000734065448">Saturday, 3 October 2026, 1pm-3.30pm</a>, The Ponsonby Community Centre, 20 Ponsonby Terrace, Auckland.<br />
<a href="https://www.eventbrite.co.nz/e/ponsonby-peoples-union-book-launch-tickets-2000730493765">Sunday, 11 October 2026, 1-4pm</a>, Whare Wānanga, Level 2, Tāmaki Pātaka Kōrero &#8211; Auckland Central Library, 44/46 Lorne St, CBD.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Work &#8211; shining a light on the machinery of NZ&#8217;s conservative politics</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/27/dirty-work-shining-a-light-on-the-machinery-of-nzs-conservative-politics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 04:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicky Hager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxpayers' Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist lobby groups]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The strength of Dirty Work is that it pulls back the curtain to reveal those who prefer to operate in the shadows. And now they&#8217;re scrambling to turn off the lights again. AGAINST THE CURRENT: By Steven Cowan The ferocity with which sections of the New Zealand right have moved to discredit Nicky Hager’s new ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The strength of </em>Dirty Work<em> is that it pulls back the curtain to reveal those who prefer to operate in the shadows. And now they&#8217;re scrambling to turn off the lights again.</em></p>
<p><strong>AGAINST THE CURRENT:</strong> <em>By Steven Cowan</em></p>
<p>The ferocity with which sections of the New Zealand right have moved to discredit Nicky Hager’s new book <a href="https://www.unitybooks.co.nz/products/dirty-work-1"><i>Dirty Work</i></a> before even turning a page tells its own story.</p>
<p>It is the same reflexive hostility that has greeted every major investigation Hager has produced over the past three decades: a rush to delegitimise, to sneer, to dismiss, all before the evidence has been examined.</p>
<p>But this time the haste has been almost comical. Within hours of the book’s release, Newstalk ZB’s Tim Beveridge &#8212; who could not possibly have read it &#8212; declared it &#8220;junk&#8221; and banned callers from discussing it on his overnight show.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Nicky+Hager"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Nicky Hager reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_134174" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-134174" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-134174 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Dirty-Work-cover-Unity-300tall.png" alt="Dirty Work . . . the cover" width="300" height="455" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Dirty-Work-cover-Unity-300tall.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Dirty-Work-cover-Unity-300tall-198x300.png 198w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Dirty-Work-cover-Unity-300tall-277x420.png 277w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-134174" class="wp-caption-text">Dirty Work . . . It shows how consent is manufactured, how outrage is cultivated, how media ecosystems are manipulated. Image: Potton &amp; Burton</figcaption></figure>
<p>Beveridge’s contempt was not grounded in analysis; it was a strike against uncomfortable truths. His close association with Jordan Williams of the Taxpayers’ Union, a regular guest on Beveridge’s Saturday afternoon show, only underscores how tightly woven these networks of mutual reinforcement have become. When a book threatens the legitimacy of that ecosystem, the ecosystem responds like a single organism.</p>
<p>National Party MP and former minister Chris Penk, too, performed the same ritual denunciation. In a column for Stuff, he admitted he had not read<i> Dirty Work &#8212;</i> then proceeded to attack it anyway.</p>
<p>Penk reduced Hager’s investigation to a caricature: &#8220;a person with left-wing views disagrees with people with right-wing views.&#8221;</p>
<p>Penk’s dismissal was not an argument; it was another conservative signal that the book should be treated as illegitimate and unworthy of engagement.</p>
<p>But more revealing still was the intervention of Dane Giraud, a member of the Free Speech Union (FSU) and a committed Zionist defender of Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza. According to Giraud, those who take Hager seriously belong to an &#8220;elite intelligentsia&#8221; suffering from something he calls<a href="https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/nicky-hager-is-of-an-elite-intelligentsia-who-hold-a-kind-of-free-speech-union-derangement-revealed-in-dirty-work-dane-giraud/premium/HGGVP6CFRJGVTHK5W4JVCVYZDY/"> &#8220;Free Speech Union derangement&#8221;</a>.  This &#8220;elite (liberal) intelligentsia&#8221; is apparently inherently hostile to an organisation like the FSU because it is an authentic grassroots movement representing everyday working-class people.</p>
<p><strong>FSU&#8217;s dishonest portrayal</strong><br />
This is a thoroughly dishonest portrayal of the FSU. It is not a working-class organisation that has emerged organically from within the workplace. It is a rebranded conservative lobby group, born out of the Taxpayers’ Union in 2018 and co-founded by corporate and political operatives including Jordan Williams. Its board includes several committed Zionists, and its campaigns consistently align with the interests of the political right.</p>
<p>To describe such an organisation as &#8220;grassroots&#8221; is not merely dishonest; it is an appropriation of working-class language for elite political ends. Traditional unions are democratic institutions funded and governed by workers themselves. They exist to bargain collectively, to protect wages, to improve safety, to build solidarity.</p>
<p>The FSU, by contrast, operates as a top-down lobby group focused on legal interventions, media pressure campaigns, and cultural warfare. It is structurally indistinguishable from the constellation of conservative advocacy outfits that have proliferated over the past decade &#8212; groups that claim to defend &#8220;free speech&#8221; while consistently mobilising against progressive movements, academic institutions, and public broadcasters.</p>
<p>Giraud’s rhetorical manoeuvre &#8212; painting critics as elitist while presenting the FSU as authentically proletarian &#8212; is a classic deflection. It shifts attention away from the organisation’s funding sources, political alliances, and ideological commitments. It reframes scrutiny as snobbery.</p>
<p>But Hager’s work has never been about cultural disdain; it has been about mapping the hidden architecture of influence. <i>Dirty Politics</i> exposed how attack blogs, political strategists, and wealthy donors coordinated smear campaigns. <i>Dirty Work</i> continues that tradition by tracing how lobby groups like the Taxpayers’ Union and their offshoots shape public debate while presenting themselves as neutral civic actors. To investigate such structures is not &#8220;derangement&#8221;. It is democratic hygiene.</p>
<p>The right’s panic over<i> Dirty Work</i> is therefore unsurprising. Hager’s investigations threaten the mythology that groups like the FSU and the Taxpayers Union depend on: the myth of independence, the myth of grassroots authenticity, the myth of representing &#8220;ordinary New Zealanders&#8221; rather than well-connected political networks.</p>
<p>When those myths are punctured, the public can see these organisations for what they are &#8212; professionalised advocacy machines that weaponise culture-war grievances to advance conservative interests.</p>
<p><strong>A shadow infrastructure</strong><br />
From a left-wing perspective,<i> Dirty Work</i> is invaluable precisely because it illuminates the machinery of contemporary conservative politics. It shows how consent is manufactured, how outrage is cultivated, how media ecosystems are manipulated, and how lobby groups coordinate narratives across platforms. It reveals the connective tissue linking talkback hosts, political operatives, advocacy groups, and sympathetic MPs.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it does not claim that these actors are engaged in a grand conspiracy; rather, it shows how shared interests, ideological alignment, and personal networks create a shadow infrastructure of influence that operates largely out of public view.</p>
<p>If the book has a limitation, it is that it stops short of connecting these dynamics to the deeper failures of capitalism itself &#8212; the structural incentives that reward polarisation, the economic interests that benefit from deregulation and austerity, the corporate funding streams that sustain lobby groups committed to shrinking the public sphere.</p>
<p>But even without that broader analysis<i>, Dirty Work</i> arms progressives with the factual ammunition needed to challenge the narratives that dominate New Zealand’s political discourse. It exposes the machinery behind the manufactured outrage, the faux-populism, and the relentless attacks on public institutions.</p>
<p>The right’s rush to bury the book before reading it is not a sign of confidence. It is a sign of fear. Hager has once again pulled back the curtain, and those who prefer to operate in the shadows are scrambling to turn off the lights.</p>
<p><em>Republished from Steven Cowan’s blog <a href="https://nzagainstthecurrent.blogspot.com/">Against The Current</a> with permission.</em></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.unitybooks.co.nz/products/dirty-work-1"><em>Dirty Work: The Taxpayers&#8217; Union and New Zealand&#8217;s Hard Right</em></a>, by Nicky Hager, 2026 (Potton &amp; Burton).</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pezeshkian speaks from the heart, but with legal, moral and strategic clarity</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/24/pezeshkian-speaks-from-the-heart-but-with-legal-moral-and-strategic-clarity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC arrest warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international criminal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[killing of children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masoud Pezeshkian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threats to Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US terrorism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=134066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Reza Nasri President Masoud Pezeshkian came to New York with a written text. After hearing US President Donald Trump at the same rostrum the day before, he set it aside, telling delegates he had prepared a speech before the US president called Iran a terrorist state. He was, by most accounts, the first ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Reza Nasri</em></p>
<p>President Masoud Pezeshkian came to New York with a written text. After hearing US President Donald Trump at the same rostrum the day before, he set it aside, telling delegates he had prepared a speech before the US president called Iran a terrorist state.</p>
<p>He was, by most accounts, the first leader to speak at the UN in person in the middle of a war with the United States.</p>
<p>Speaking from the heart is why the historic address will be heard well beyond the hall. It should not hide how precise it was &#8212; legally, morally and strategically.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/24/gaza-watches-israels-election-with-fear-and-antipathy"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Gaza watches Israel’s elections with fear and antipathy</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Iran%2C+Palestine">Other Iran, Palestine reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>He opened with photographs of dead children, victims of American and Israeli bombs, and a direct reply: &#8220;We have been the victims of terrorism.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have only defended ourselves. We are not terrorists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Palestinians know this inversion well. A people defends itself, and the aggressor calls the defence terrorism. Anyone who has watched the last seven months with clarity will recognise it.</p>
<p>He answered the bullying Trump had put on display, musing aloud about &#8220;annihilating&#8221; Iran, by standing on the ground of law. Everything said against Iran from that podium, he argued, contradicted the UN Charter.</p>
<p><strong>Use of force, threats forbidden</strong><br />
He is right. Article 2(4) forbids not only the use of force but the threat of it, and a head of state weighing the annihilation of a fellow member state before the General Assembly is as plain a threat as the Charter&#8217;s drafters could have imagined.</p>
<p>Iran asks for no special treatment, only the sovereign equality the Charter promises every member. On the nuclear file, his formula was &#8220;no nuclear weapons, and no limitations to peaceful nuclear technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is the NPT&#8217;s own bargain: the treaty bars non-nuclear states from acquiring the bomb, and its Article IV guarantees the &#8220;inalienable right&#8221; of every party to peaceful nuclear energy &#8220;without discrimination.&#8221;</p>
<p>He was equally plain that Iran built its defences to guarantee that any strike on its cities is answered. In Nicaragua v. United States, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that international law places no limit on a sovereign state&#8217;s armaments beyond what it accepts by treaty.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Iran&#8217;s President Pezeshkian displays images of Iran&#8217;s martyred Leader and the several children murdered in the US-Israeli attacks on Iran during his UNGA address.</p>
<p>Follow Press TV on Telegram: <a href="https://t.co/GHI09iAGh2">https://t.co/GHI09iAGh2</a> <a href="https://t.co/eGDt1DDAHA">pic.twitter.com/eGDt1DDAHA</a></p>
<p>— Press TV <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f53b.png" alt="🔻" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> (@PressTV) <a href="https://x.com/PressTV/status/2102774021763035329?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 23, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>He also took apart the Israeli-made story that Iran&#8217;s political establishment is on the verge of collapse, and that Iranians would welcome foreign invaders. For seven months people have been in the streets daily in support of the defence effort.</p>
<p>The same fact answers Trump&#8217;s claim that the Iranian state has killed tens of thousands of its own people. A population does not rally under bombardment behind a government it regards as its killer.</p>
<p><strong>Naming the war crimes</strong><br />
Then he named the war crimes. He showed images of the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab and of a sports hall in Lamerd where children had been playing. A weapon that scatters tens of thousands of tungsten fragments cannot be used on a school or a gymnasium without striking indiscriminately.</p>
<p>A UN fact-finding mission reported this month that there are reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed war crimes in the February 28 strikes. The US delegate left the hall during this passage. Pezeshkian drew the parallel with Gaza, where the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/26/un-court-orders-israel-to-ensure-acts-of-genocide-are-not-committed-in-gaza">ICJ has ordered Israel to prevent acts of genocide</a> and the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued <a href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/defendant/netanyahu">arrest warrants for its prime minister</a> and former defence minister.</p>
<p>He turned next to Israel&#8217;s nuclear arsenal. Israel stays outside the NPT and accepts no comprehensive safeguards, although the Security Council called on it in Resolution 487 of 1981 to place its facilities under IAEA safeguards, and the General Assembly repeats the call every year.</p>
<p>Israel has struck the capitals of its neighbours in breach of the Charter and carries out a documented pattern of war crimes, yet keeps its weapons with impunity. Iran, which has acted only in self-defence for two centuries, is sanctioned and attacked instead, although its facilities remain under an IAEA safeguards agreement.</p>
<p>On Hormuz, he described a strait closed to Iran even as it serves to ship missiles and weaponry into the surrounding region. The law of the sea does not allow this.</p>
<p>The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, which Washington invokes but has never ratified, requires ships passing through a strait to refrain from any threat or use of force against the states bordering it. Under the older rule of innocent passage, a ship serving an attack on the coastal state is no longer in innocent passage at all.</p>
<p><strong>Will not be shut out</strong><br />
Iran will not be shut out of its own waters while others use them to make war on it.</p>
<p>He closed on the indivisibility of security: it exists for everyone in the region or for no one. The idea has a long pedigree. European states wrote it into the Helsinki Final Act in 1975 and restated it in 1999, pledging not to strengthen their own security at the expense of others.</p>
<p>&#8220;We want strong neighbors,&#8221; Pezeshkian said. Iran has always been open to diplomacy, &#8220;without accepting the language of force.&#8221;</p>
<p><em><span class="css-1jxf684 r-bcqeeo r-1ttztb7 r-qvutc0 r-poiln3"><a href="https://x.com/RezaNasri1">Rez Nasri</a> is an international lawyer, foreign policy analyst, and he writes about Iran in Persian, English and French.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the wake of MIDA, Fiji&#8217;s news industry has turned full circle for media freedom</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/23/in-the-wake-of-mida-fijis-news-industry-has-turned-full-circle-for-media-freedom/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji media industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Media Industry Development Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji National University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalist training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PINA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebuilding trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savusavu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitiveni Rabuka]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Anish Chand in Savusavu In 2023, Fiji&#8217;s Media Industry Development Authority (MIDA) was scrapped, marking a significant moment for Fiji’s media landscape. A year later, at the PINA Media Summit in Niue, Fijian journalists spoke openly about rebuilding &#8212; of a media industry that was learning to find its feet again, reclaim its ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong><em> By Anish Chand in Savusavu</em></p>
<p>In 2023, Fiji&#8217;s Media Industry Development Authority (MIDA) was scrapped, marking a significant moment for Fiji’s media landscape.</p>
<p>A year later, at the PINA Media Summit in Niue, Fijian journalists spoke openly about rebuilding &#8212; of a media industry that was learning to find its feet again, reclaim its confidence and, importantly, rediscover its freedom.</p>
<p>At that Niue meeting, we lobbied and won the bid to bring 2026 PINA Summit to Fiji.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=PINA"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other PINA Pacific media summit reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>This week, we are in Savusavu and with Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka choosing to attend and officially open the summit almost four years after his government threw out MIDA, it feels like a full circle has been completed.</p>
<p>The Prime Minister’s announcement that Fiji National University will partner with the Fijian Media Association to establish a media training centre in Suva was the icing on the cake.</p>
<p>It is a significant commitment to strengthening journalism skills, professional development and the future of Fiji’s media industry.</p>
<p><strong>Allowed media space</strong><br />
Love him or hate him, Prime Minister Rabuka has maintained an open and accessible relationship with Fijian journalists. He has taken questions, faced tough interviews and allowed the media space to scrutinise his government and his decisions.</p>
<p>For an industry that has spent years navigating uncertainty, rebuilding trust and finding its voice, having the Prime Minister open the regional media summit in Fiji &#8212; and announce support for journalist training &#8212; was more than symbolic.</p>
<p>It was a reminder of how far we have come, and how much further we still have to go.</p>
<p><em>Republished from Fiji Times managing digital editor Anish Chand’s social media post with permission. He is a former Fiji TV news operations manager.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saige England: No judgments, freedom and about rocking the boat</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/22/saige-england-no-judgments-freedom-and-about-rocking-the-boat/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abayya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faux feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hijab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western expat women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western feminism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Saige England This is a photo of me in the desert in Saudi Arabia 19 years ago. Was I covered? You bet. I recall receiving a letter from a white feminist friend who told me my feminism must have been skewed by my experience in the Middle East. Actually I met so many ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Saige England</em></p>
<p>This is a photo of me in the desert in Saudi Arabia 19 years ago. Was I covered? You bet.</p>
<p>I recall receiving a letter from a white feminist friend who told me my feminism must have been skewed by my experience in the Middle East.</p>
<p>Actually I met so many feisty feminists in the Middle East and I found a Middle East very different to the one I&#8217;d seen on the mainstream media.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Saige+England"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Saige England reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>My Middle East was a Middle East of moons and stars and tents and light garments draped like tents. My Middle East was the Middle East of palaces in the desert and mysterious winds.</p>
<p>Were there things that were wrong there? Yes. Just as there are in the US. But I saw and experienced much that was good. I rose in my employment, I managed and supervised and I met other women who were managers and supervisors.</p>
<p>As one Italian woman said: &#8220;It is easier for me to rise as a woman here.&#8221; I found that too. I found work easily in Qatar. I found it difficult here in Aotearoa to rise, no matter how well I did in terms of qualifications and awards.</p>
<p>New Zealand is only free if you don&#8217;t write about certain matters. If you don&#8217;t rock the boat. If you aren&#8217;t too much &#8212; too pro the environment or too pro indigenous rights. I still write about those aspects of life.</p>
<p><strong>Relatively speaking</strong><br />
There, in Qatar, I worked with women who were covered and women who were uncovered. Relatively speaking.</p>
<p>I met women who covered from choice. I met women who were forced to cover (and that is wrong). I met women who were conservative and who didn&#8217;t cover. I met feminists who covered. I met women who wore the veil and the abbaya because they were radical &#8212; it was a way of giving the finger to the US.</p>
<p>Speaking of the US &#8212; US military bases were everywhere. The US had invaded Iraq. The military wives often drank a lot.</p>
<p>I interviewed US soldiers and found them worrying. Their education had been conservative, fundamentalist, narrow.</p>
<p>Many US soldiers were bright but they supported the US nuclear bombing of Japan, they supported nuclear everything. They thought all Arabs and environmentalists were terrorists.</p>
<p>When I first arrived, the Twin Towers had been bombed and I&#8217;d heard lots of reports about Al Qaeda. I used to leap into taxis vowing that I was not American. I was told that &#8220;it is ok, lady, we aren&#8217;t like those crazies&#8221; (people who blow up buildings).</p>
<p>The people I met were peaceful hospitable people. The women I met wanted careers.</p>
<p><strong>Issues were the same</strong><br />
One of my friends, an Aussie, was a psychologist. I asked her if the problems her female clients faced were different &#8212; did Western expat women have different issues to Qatari or Lebanese or Egyptian or Pakistani women? Nope. The issues were all the same: &#8220;Is my husband cheating on me?&#8221;, &#8220;Are my children OK?&#8221;</p>
<p>When I arrived in Qatar the divorce rate of the local population was 51 per cent. Many young women chose not to marry.</p>
<p>In Qatar and Bahrain women covered, or didn&#8217;t, by choice. Some told me they wore the garments because they were easy and affordable. They could dress up after uni but they could just grab the robe by day. Some wore the veil on a bad hair day. Oh, there were a raft of reasons.</p>
<p>What saddens and sickens me is that I&#8217;m often not believed about this. I&#8217;ve been accused of betraying the feminist cause. The kind of feminists who don&#8217;t ask other women what they want. Those kind of feminists tell me I compromised.</p>
<p>But I felt the compromise when I attended a tupperware party here where the whole room except me launched into racist jibes about Indians. Ye Gods, spare me.</p>
<p>Back here, a few years back, I befriended Fatin who came from Singapore and who lived here in Aotearoa while studying. Fatin was bright and so lovely, so open and kind and free. A poet. She read 30 books in a year. She loved the author, Elif Shafak, a favourite author of mine. We bonded.</p>
<p>But Fatin was often abused in Ōtautahi by people who told her she shouldn&#8217;t be wearing the veil or the robe. They felt sorry for her, they said. Fatin said she felt sorry for them for judging others.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;No judgment&#8217; . . . a favourite</strong><br />
&#8220;No judgement&#8221; was one of Fatin&#8217;s favourite sayings. I learned so much from her. Sadly, she had to leave because she couldn&#8217;t gain a residency visa.</p>
<p>Women wear clothing for all sorts of reasons. What concerns me far more than what we wear is unnecessary body surgery. I saw boob jobs and lip jobs, and jaw-broken jobs in the Middle East just as I see them in the West.</p>
<p>I see women manufacturing themselves as products to please men. It makes me sick. Don&#8217;t do it. Don&#8217;t. Be yourself.</p>
<p>I wore the robe and the veil that hot day in Saudi because it kept the sun and the hot dry wind off my face and body. Like so many women, I was naked underneath. I felt that warm wind caress me.</p>
<p>I loathe the men who make women wear what they don&#8217;t want to wear. I&#8217;ve always resisted that. I didn&#8217;t throw out my hippy skirt when my ex wanted me to, I kept it, cherished it, I sparkled and shone. But I&#8217;ve also felt shamed by women who tell me I shouldn&#8217;t bother using a towel to shield myself while getting dressed on the beach or while camping.</p>
<p>My choice sometimes is to cover. Sometimes the robe feels good. I like the feeling of having my own wee house and being safe underneath. That is my choice. If I lived differently or had different experiences or had never been abused in this Western world perhaps I would think differently but that is my experience.</p>
<p>I fight the predators in my own way. And I know that freedom is not here yet.</p>
<p><strong>Western abuse insidious</strong><br />
The abuse in the West is insidious. It is often denied. We believe we are free but we are not free. There is another form of control.</p>
<p>Women are bombarded with social messages that tell us to straighten our noses or lighten our skin. They are everywhere.</p>
<p>They appear on my feed as they probably appear on yours.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve aged in an age where I&#8217;ve watched young women pout and lie and become &#8220;influencers&#8221; selling all sorts of fake garbage and sadly, faking themselves. It isn&#8217;t good for their mental health. It isn&#8217;t good at all. Are they free? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>How do we unpick the social fabric of inequity especially when it tells us we are free.</p>
<p>Freedom is the freedom to choose. Freedom is the freedom to vote. Freedom is the freedom to use our voices and to wear what we want to wear. Freedom is the freedom and the choice not to turn ourselves into objects for the pleasure of others.</p>
<p>Freedom is the freedom to not be raped or abused or killed. Freedom is the freedom to love and learn. Freedom is the freedom to work &#8212; to work outside or inside and not be pressured to do both.</p>
<p>Women deserve freedom.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Saige+England">Saige England</a> is an award-winning journalist and author of </em><a href="https://aotearoabooks.co.nz/the-seasonwife/">The Seasonwife</a><em>, a novel exploring the brutal impacts of colonisation. She is also a contributor to Asia Pacific Report.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaza genocide: We made machines that think &#8211; then corrupted them for industrialised slaughter</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/21/gaza-genocide-we-made-machines-that-think-then-corrupted-them-for-industrialised-slaughter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI data factories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI genocide report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI killing systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lavender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Tracy Campbell There is something grotesque about taking one of the greatest intellectual achievements in human history &#8212; a technology capable of translating languages, modelling proteins, accelerating scientific discovery, assisting doctors, educating children and placing an astonishing repository of human knowledge at an ordinary person&#8217;s fingertips &#8212; and harnessing it to the ancient ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Tracy Campbell</em></p>
<p>There is something grotesque about taking one of the greatest intellectual achievements in human history &#8212; a technology capable of translating languages, modelling proteins, accelerating scientific discovery, assisting doctors, educating children and placing an astonishing repository of human knowledge at an ordinary person&#8217;s fingertips &#8212; and harnessing it to the ancient government business of deciding who may be killed.</p>
<p>States hardly needed technological assistance with that.</p>
<p>For as long as states have made war, they have assassinated, disappeared, tortured and executed.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Lavender’: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/20/the-controversial-documentary-naza-10-reasons-to-defend-this-whistleblower-war-on-gaza-film/">The controversial documentary NAZA: 10 reasons to defend this whistleblower war on Gaza film</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=AI+killing+in+Gaza">Other AI killing in Gaza</a></li>
</ul>
<p>They have acted on rotten intelligence, mistaken civilians for enemies, bombed the wrong houses and buried the innocent alongside the intended target.</p>
<p>Humanity has accumulated centuries of law in an attempt to restrain that capacity for violence.</p>
<p>Now we have given it an algorithm.</p>
<p>A <a href="https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/"><em>+972 Magazine</em> investigation</a> into Israel&#8217;s “Lavender” system used in the Gaza genocide describes an AI-assisted process that marked tens of thousands of Palestinians as suspected militants for potential assassination. Six Israeli intelligence sources described enormous target lists, scant human scrutiny and predetermined tolerances for civilian deaths.</p>
<p><strong>Significance of Lavender</strong><br />
The significance of Lavender reaches far beyond one system, one military, or one war.</p>
<p>Artificial intelligence does not hate anyone. It has no territory to conquer, no frightened electorate to appease, no flag to salute and no enemy it wants dead.</p>
<p>It cannot decide that one nationality, ethnicity or political movement is hateful. It cannot lust for revenge.</p>
<p>Humans supply the malice</p>
<p>And AI offers governments a hideous new possibility: not merely to make lethal decisions, but to industrialise them.</p>
<p>A human life can become data, the data a probability, the probability a classification and the classification a target. Somewhere along that progression, the unique, precious universe of a living person &#8212; somebody&#8217;s child, parent, lover, neighbour &#8212; disappears into a machine-generated assessment which can be processed thousands of times faster than any human being could properly investigate the people concerned.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t intelligence replacing human cruelty &#8212; it is human cruelty acquiring computational power.</p>
<p><strong>Recreated in machinery</strong><br />
Alan Turing wondered whether machines could think. John McCarthy gave artificial intelligence its name. Claude Shannon helped establish the mathematics on which our information age was built. Marvin Minsky devoted much of his life to understanding whether intelligence itself could be recreated in machinery.</p>
<p>They helped begin an intellectual adventure of almost preposterous ambition: to understand intelligence sufficiently well that we might reproduce some part of it.</p>
<p>Today Demis Hassabis speaks of developing AI to benefit humanity. Dario Amodei leads Anthropic, founded around the problem of making immensely powerful AI safe.</p>
<p>Sam Altman heads OpenAI, whose stated mission is to ensure artificial general intelligence benefits all humanity.</p>
<p>Surely this cannot be what benefiting humanity was supposed to mean.</p>
<p>AI may help us understand disease, proteins, climate, mathematics, language and perhaps eventually the nature of intelligence itself. Yet the same extraordinary capacity to detect patterns across quantities of information beyond the reach of a human mind can be turned towards finding patterns in a population and deciding which people resemble the people a state wants dead.</p>
<p>And therein lies another danger.</p>
<p><strong>Human judgement, evidence</strong><br />
When a human intelligence officer says, “I believe this person is a combatant,” we understand that a human being has made a judgment and can demand the evidence behind it.</p>
<p>When a machine assigns a probability, the mathematics can lend the conclusion an entirely undeserved aura of objectivity. But an algorithm cannot cleanse dubious intelligence, discriminatory assumptions or corrupted data merely by processing them at enormous speed.</p>
<p>Nor can it assume responsibility.</p>
<p>The analyst can point to the algorithm. The commander can point to the analyst. The politician can invoke the demands of war. The engineer can say the machine was only an advisory tool.</p>
<p>The machine, magnificently innocent of everything, points nowhere.</p>
<p>That is why human responsibility must remain absolute. I would go so far as to say that any use of AI in warfare should be prohibited.</p>
<p>Artificial intelligence must never become moral laundering for state violence. A computer-generated confidence score does not acquire the moral weight of evidence merely because mathematics produced it.</p>
<p><strong>10,000 suspicions</strong><br />
Processing 10,000 suspicions in the time a human being could properly investigate 10 does not make those suspicions more reliable. It merely makes killing scalable.</p>
<p>Turing did not ask whether machines could think so that governments could think less.</p>
<p>Human beings have finally built machines capable of doing things our ancestors could scarcely have imagined.</p>
<p>If one of the achievements of artificial intelligence is that it enables us to kill people faster, we will not have taught machines something new.</p>
<p>We will simply have taught them something terribly old.</p>
<p><em>Tracy-Moana Campbell is an employment relations advocate based in Masterton and an activist on Palestinian human rights. She had a commercial orange grove in Lebanon 10km from the Israeli border in 2005-2011. Israel bombed her oranges in 2006. It is a war crime to destroy civilian food sources. This commentary was originally a social media post but has been republished with the author’s permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caitlin Johnstone: Assange returns to public commentary . . .  and other notes</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/20/caitlin-johnstone-assange-returns-to-public-commentary-and-other-notes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 05:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bearing Witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A better world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aggressors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belmarsh Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Sheeran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neutral fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power imbalance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Empire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone Julian Assange is officially back on X/Twitter, restoring to the world an important voice we were robbed of by the US empire’s years-long campaign to silence the WikiLeaks founder via lifelong imprisonment for forbidden acts of journalism. Not everyone will remember it but there was a time when this was almost ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>Julian Assange is officially <a href="https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331" target="_blank" rel="noopener">back on X/Twitter</a>, restoring to the world an important voice we were robbed of by the US empire’s years-long campaign to silence the WikiLeaks founder via lifelong imprisonment for forbidden acts of journalism.</p>
<p>Not everyone will remember it but there was a time when this was almost impossible to imagine. It seemed almost certain that this man was going to die in Belmarsh Prison or spend his remaining years in some hellhole in America.</p>
<p>Now whenever my nephew catches me or my husband expressing pessimism about something working out, he tells us “Hey. Assange is free now.” It’s become our family code for “Anything’s possible. Don’t give up hope.”</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8yC2RMGM54" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>LISTEN:</strong> Video reading by Tim Foley</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Caitlin+Johnstone">Other Caitlln Johnstone reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/z8yC2RMGM54?si=7hXxmfD0kmCy-uHf" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Assange returns                                                 Video: Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>We should really try to appreciate this. Never let hope die. A better world is possible. Anything can be.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>In other news, it’s good to see the world rejecting Ed Sheeran’s policy of feigned neutrality on the Gaza issue. “I don’t pick sides” is a fallacy when there’s a massive power imbalance and a clear aggressor, especially when your own country is partially responsible for what’s happening.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">I&#8217;m back. <a href="https://t.co/2e58azeJkt">https://t.co/2e58azeJkt</a></p>
<p>— Julian Assange (@JulianAssange) <a href="https://x.com/JulianAssange/status/2100571158777045331?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>If your husband is abusing your child and you do nothing, you’re not a neutral party in that scenario, and when your kid grows up you’ll probably be blamed just as much as the father.</p>
<p>A modern military force hammering a giant concentration camp full of colonised people using high-tech weapons of mass murder with the help of your tax dollars is not a “war” that you get to be “neutral” towards. It’s a genocide, and you’re either for it or against it.</p>
<p>There is no comfortable third option where you get to avoid picking a side and also avoid looking like an asshole.</p>
<p>One of the most idiotic talking points you’ll see these days is that it’s bad to criticise Israel without also criticising Hamas. It’s like, what do you mean? You’re saying I can’t criticise a nuclear-armed high-tech military committing war crimes with the backing of my own country and its allies unless I also criticise a tiny group of besieged militants?</p>
<p>You’re telling me I can’t say anything about the abuses of an apartheid state whose supporters are relentlessly assaulting my right to free speech and eroding civil liberties throughout the Western world, unless I in the same breath also criticise a few thousand Palestinian resistance fighters who have done me no wrong? What the hell are you even talking about?</p>
<p>No I’m just going to criticise Israel, thank you very much. I am going to criticise the state whose genocidal atrocities are supported by the power structure under which I live and pay taxes, whose support network is systematically demolishing the rights of me and my countrymen. If you don’t like it, go screw yourself.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">If you want to enrage an Israel apologist, tell them you won&#8217;t listen to the mountains upon mountains of verbiage they throw at you explaining why it&#8217;s actually fine to drop bombs on buildings full of children. <a href="https://t.co/61JI50IozZ">pic.twitter.com/61JI50IozZ</a></p>
<p>— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) <a href="https://x.com/caitoz/status/2099995294331273397?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><strong>I have a few more thoughts for today:<br />
</strong>Firstly, I love it when I see Israel apologists whining about people responding to their screeds with “I ain’t reading all that. Free Palestine.” All hasbarists have is endless mountains of verbiage explaining why it’s fine and normal to drop military explosives on buildings full of children, so it enrages them when someone takes away their only weapon.</p>
<p>They don’t have truth and morality on their side, so all they have is words, words, words, words, words. Take that away from them and they’ve got nothing, and they know it.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Imagine for 1 second that you have it wrong and Jews are telling the truth. That the genocide libel is bs. That Hamas are terrorists. That you are being manipulated to desire the removal of Jews from society.</p>
<p>Do you understand if we’re right, that makes you the millions of…</p>
<p>— Jonah Platt (@JonahPlatt) <a href="https://x.com/JonahPlatt/status/2100297744204313046?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>And finally, new rule: if you deny that Israel is guilty of genocide in Gaza, then the onus is on you to provide a convincing explanation for why <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/no-were-not-having-the-its-not-genocide">every human rights group</a> on earth (including the Israeli ones) agrees it’s a genocide.</p>
<p>If you hold that there’s an antisemitic conspiracy between all human rights groups, then the burden of proof is on you to show that conspiracy taking place.</p>
<p>If you hold that there has been an Islamist conspiracy to infiltrate all human rights groups, then you need to provide proof of that conspiracy.</p>
<p>If you hold that there is no conspiracy and it’s just a coincidence that all human rights groups happen to think Israel is committing human rights abuses, then you need to provide a convincing argument why every institution of human rights experts coincidentally came to the same conclusion and are still incorrect.</p>
<p>You can’t just say “I disagree with their findings” or “That one group made an argument I find weak” or “It’s not a genocide because blah blah blah”. You need to address the unanimous consensus, because that’s part of the debate now.</p>
<p>Even flat earthers and climate deniers who claim all the experts are wrong at least try to provide arguments for why there’s a secret conspiracy to amplify faulty conclusions in the scientific community, but deniers of the Gaza genocide somehow seem to think they don’t need to address their dissent with the overwhelming consensus of experts in the relevant field.</p>
<p>You don’t get to do that, guys. That’s not a thing. If you’re claiming the experts are lying about one specific country, then you need to provide a detailed and believable explanation for why that might be.</p>
<p>I’ve yet to encounter a single genocide denier who can do this, online or otherwise. Not one.</p>
<p>PS: Claiming you can’t accuse Israel of genocide until the ICJ rules it a genocide is exactly the same as claiming you can’t say Charlie Kirk was murdered until his killer has been officially convicted of murder.</p>
<p><a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/"><em>Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em> is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include <a href="https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-un-torture-report-on-assange-is-an-indictment-of-our-entire-society-bc7b0a7130a6">The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society</a>. She publishes a website and <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/">Caitlin’s Newsletter</a>. This article is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;End Times Fascism&#8217; &#8211; Naomi Klein, Astra Taylor on billionaires, bunkers, AI, Gaza and the Far Right</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/18/end-times-fascism-naomi-klein-astra-taylor-on-billionaires-bunkers-ai-gaza-and-the-far-right/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI fascists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astra Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate elites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture war issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data centres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy Now!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanity v machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scapegoats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shared world]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Democracy Now! AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, the War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman in New York joined by Democracy Now! cohost Juan González in Chicago. Hi, Juan. JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Hi, Amy, and welcome to all of our listeners and viewers across the country and around the world. AMY GOODMAN: “The people building ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.democracynow.org/"><em>Democracy Now!</em></a></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: This is <a href="https://www.democracynow.org/">Democracy Now!</a>, the War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman in New York joined by Democracy Now! cohost Juan González in Chicago. Hi, Juan.</em></p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Hi, Amy, and welcome to all of our listeners and viewers across the country and around the world.</em></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us by the end of the decade.” That was the warning last week from former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon that set off an escalating debate over how to regulate increasingly powerful AI systems. </em></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/10/ai-artificial-intelligence-billionaires-wealth.html"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> AI is creating new billionaires at a record pace</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=A1+developments">Other AI reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Coxon spoke to the BBC:</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>COXON:</strong> So it’s not at all an exaggeration to say that the people who were involved with both founding these companies and building the tech believe there is a possibility of human extinction.</p>
<p>And many of the people who are sort of deep in the weeds on actually coding the thing believe that there is like a greater than 10pc chance or even greater &#8211; some smaller, but they all have different numbers &#8211; for a probability that humans might die.</p>
<p>And they all keep this in their head on a daily basis while working on the technology.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei also called for the pace of development of artificial intelligence models to slow down. In an essay, he wrote that within six to 12 months a swarm of AI agents could be capable of taking over the entire internet and cause hundreds of billions of dollars in damage. </em></p>
<p><em>He wrote, “The scale of damage would continue to increase from there if AI becomes more powerful without the necessary guardrails.” But President Trump has rejected growing calls for placing regulatory guardrails on the AI industry and has called concerns over AI a “hoax”. </em></p>
<p><em>On Monday, Trump called Jensen Huang, the CEO of the computer chip maker Nvidia, while Huang was speaking at an AI summit in Los Angeles. Huang put the president on speakerphone.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRES. TRUMP:</strong> The data centers are great and they make people wealthy and they make states wealthy and it’s the oil of the next 20, 25 years. It’s bigger than the Internet.</p>
<p>And the AI, you know, much more so. And they are just playing right into the hands of a lot of people that don’t want to see it happen.</p>
<p>And that could be political people; it could also be China. And we’re not going to let that happen. It’s a hoax. And [crosstalk]—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>JENSEN HUANG</strong> [laughs] You’re right. We’re not going to let that happen, sir.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>AUDIENCE:</strong> [applause]</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRES. TRUMP:</strong> No, we’re not going to let it happen. The robots are not going to be taking over the world.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: As the debate over AI intensifies, the award-winning journalists and writers Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor have a new book out today that is connected to all of this. It is titled <a href="https://www.penguin.co.nz/books/end-times-fascism-9780241816288">End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World</a>. </em></p>
<p><em>It examines how wealthy elites, including tech CEOs, are preparing for the end of the world even as they contribute to growing inequality, political instability, wars and the climate crisis. They will join us in a minute but first, here is a short excerpt from a video that was released with the book.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>ASTRA TAYLOR:</strong> End-times fascism is not a monolith. It’s a dangerous and fractious alliance of three main groups.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NARRATOR:</strong> Religious end-timers.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>ROBERT JEFFRESS:</strong> From the very beginning it has been clear that god has a special plan and purpose for the nation of Israel.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NARRATOR:</strong> Tech end-timers.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>SAM ALTMAN:</strong> You know, I think AI will probably like most likely sort of lead to the end of the world. But in the meantime there will be great companies created.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NARRATOR:</strong> Ethnonationalist end-timers.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>BENJAMIN NETANYAHU:</strong> America is fighting with Israel for a common goal &#8211; to protect our future, to protect civilisation against these barbarians.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> That was a good take right there.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Seig fucking Heil, let’s fucking go!</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> You would prefer the human race to endure, right?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Uh—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> You’re hesitant.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Yeah, well, I—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> End-times fascists haven’t just given up on liberal democracy. They’ve given up on the possibility of a shared future for all of us.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> The most powerful people in the world &#8211;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> &#8211; are preparing for the end of the world &#8211;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong>  &#8211; an end they themselves are both accelerating &#8211;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> &#8211; and profiting from.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>ELON MUSK:</strong> [laughs]</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> We have imagined Armageddon so many times it can almost feel inevitable. Except it’s not. So, which side are you on?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> The side of bunkering down, abandoning Earth and profiting from apocalypse? Or staying loyal to this planet and its people—</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Who are you aligned with? Who are you protecting?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> &#8211; and making life here better?</p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Qe7KB1AqhH4?si=K4wwVfM1eJaDSWde" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>&#8216;End Times Fascism&#8217;      Video: Democracy Now!</em></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: A short video released in conjunction with the new book End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World written by our guests in studio for the hour. </em></p>
<p><em>Naomi Klein, award-winning journalist, documentary filmmaker, best-selling author of a number of books including </em>Doppelganger<em> and </em>No Logo<em> and </em>The Shock Doctrine<em>. Naomi Klein is also an associate professor and co-director of the Centre for Climate Justice at the University of British Columbia in Canada. </em></p>
<p><em>Astra Taylor is an award-winning writer, activist and documentary filmmaker, the co-founder of the Debt Collective and author of several books including T</em>he Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things Fall Apart<em> and </em>The People’s Platform: Taking Back Power and Culture in the Digital Age<em>. </em></p>
<p><em>Thanks so much for spending the hour with us. Naomi, start off with a title, start off with End Times Fascism, why you chose this.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> First of all, thank you for having us here, Amy. It’s great to be launching the book on <em>Democracy Now!</em> It just came out this morning, as you said. And I think we have a long tradition of launching books together. We decided to call it <em>End Times Fascism</em> because we are trying to understand what is the same and what is different about our moment of far-right extremism.</p>
<p>We know that far-right parties with lineages to the fascists of the 20th century are rising to power around the world. We just saw a fateful election in a German state, the first time the far right has won an election since the Second World War. We’re seeing very disturbing polls in France, for instance.</p>
<p>And we’re seeing more and more open fascist expressions in the United States from very powerful people in government and in tech.</p>
<p>But we don’t believe that this is simply a rerun. We don’t believe that history repeats on a loop. We believe that we’re in something more like a sequel where the logics of fascism, which are the logics of dehumanisation, of othering, of racial supremacy and hierarchy, are now being applied in a time of global existential crisis. This is not news to <em>Democracy Now!</em> listeners and viewers that we live in a time of a climate breakdown and collapse.</p>
<p>We have tools like nuclear weapons, that were not known to Hitler and Mussolini, that have the ability to inflict apocalyptic levels of violence that were beyond their reach.</p>
<p>Fascism always emerges during times of systemic crises, and it actually emerges as a way to protect capitalism from systemic change. So if we think about 20th century fascism in Europe after the First World War, there was a rising socialist response to the wreckage of the First World War and then to the Great Depression.</p>
<p>And fascism rises up &#8212; we call it “capitalism threat response” or “capitalism with bared teeth” &#8212; to make sure all of that popular public anger is pivoted toward the scapegoat. In our time, as we see these global crises &#8212; that could lead to systemic change or there can be this what we are calling “end times fascist” response that says, “let it burn,” and now it’s a fight for who’s going to survive the future.</p>
<p>Now it’s about building &#8212; as you saw in that film that we were fortunate to work with a great team of filmmakers on &#8212; it’s about building the bunkers and the rocket ships and the escape hatches. For religious end-timers, it’s literally about the bunker in the sky; it’s about the idea of the rapture.</p>
<p>But that is almost like a template for these more secular stories that are also a kind of a rapture, but we call it in the book a “wealth rapture”. If you’ve got resources, you can rapture yourself away from the impacts of those threats that we are all in. So that’s why we call it <em>End Times Fascism</em>. It hasn’t won yet.</p>
<p>The reason we wrote the book is because people are fighting back. And we think if we are able to look at this very frightening reality with clear eyes, the more it is exposed to the light, the less popular it is because in fact those people cherish our one and only home and want to stay and want to make it better.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Naomi, how is this different, for example, if in the 1950s and 1960s when at the height of the Cold War there were Americans, especially upper-class Americans, building bomb shelters, convinced that there was going to be a nuclear war, and the rest of the population eventually began to organise in an anti-nuclear movement that peaked in the 1980s and that led really to capitalism being forced to restrain itself to some degree in terms of arms control treaties? </em></p>
<p><em>Why is this different than back then?</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Well, Juan, I guess it’s different because the people we’re calling end-times fascists are systematically dismantling that precise international infrastructure. One of the things that all those three factions all agree on &#8212; whether it’s the religious fundamentalists, the tech extremists that we heard from in that video, or the ethnonationalists &#8212; they don’t agree on everything but they all agree they want to get rid of the United Nations.</p>
<p>They all believe that that is the sort of antichrist of their story. Sometimes they literally call it the antichrist. And that chapter that you are describing, which we write about in the book, Juan &#8212; and I would actually love to bring Astra into the conversation because she went pretty deep into this research on the history of bunkering in the United States and how people shifted the tide, because we actually think that’s a really inspiring story that we need to know better.</p>
<p>Can I bring in Astra, my incredible co-author?</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Sure.</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR: </em>Thank you so much. Again, thanks for having us. Yeah, it is &#8212; very quickly, in the 1950s, the government policy was to encourage people to build their own bomb shelters in their backyard, and that was the response to the nuclear threat. Only around 1 percent, 2 percent of households did that, in part because people revolted at the idea of protecting themselves and letting their neighbors perish.</p>
<p>And there was a massive debate in magazines like <em>TIME</em> magazine, <em>LIFE</em> magazine that was around the idea of “gunning thy neighbor”. People said, “We don’t want to do that. We don’t want to be hiding in a hole in the ground with guns pointing outwards and turning the people we care about away.”</p>
<p>That is part of the genesis of the movement for nuclear disarmament. It was ordinary people who put the right solution on the table, which is let’s get rid of nuclear bombs; let’s not turn on each other and bunker down. There’s a lesson in that for today.</p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> It’s so interesting because what they understood at the time is like either you bunker &#8212; either you just protect you and yours &#8212; or you get at the root cause of the crisis and you say, “Actually, we can’t live with these weapons.” Right? It’s just—”It’s too dangerous.”</p>
<p>As you both know, the nuclear disarmament movement had tremendous successes. In many ways, we argue in the book that it was a victim of its own success because many people in the disarmament movement believed that they had won so many victories that now the people in charge were just going to finish the job, because so many thousands of nuclear warheads were successfully disarmed that it seemed like there was a new era.</p>
<p>The majority of the stockpiles were disarmed but not enough, and now there is a rearming and AI is being embedded in the nuclear arsenal. Which is why at the end of the book we call for a triple disarmament movement.</p>
<p>In fact, Juan, we have something that you might be interested in &#8212; a new coinage in the book &#8212; which is “the Stephen Miller test”. Basically the argument that we’re making is that eventually, the most powerful tools, the most powerful weapons, will meet the worst people in the world, and if you don’t want those tools to find themselves in the hands of Stephen Miller, then the tools should not exist.</p>
<p>That applies to nuclear weapons. It applies to AI. It applies to the wealth concentration itself, which we believe should be now understood as a WMD. That this level of wealth that has accumulated at the top of our economy has itself become a weapon of mass destruction.</p>
<p>And so we need to be disarming the wealth bombs, the tech bombs, and of course, the bomb-bombs. Because we are now seeing that these very dangerous, completely immoral people who seem to have such a casual attitude &#8212; and we see this from Donald Trump’s most recent post, just a kind of shrug in the face of apocalypse &#8212; they will find &#8212; they exert a magnetic pull towards one another.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: I wanted to follow-up and ask either one of you if you want to answer this, because I did read the book in the last couple of days and really found it to be tremendously well written. At the same time, though, there were some concerns I had. For instance, there is very little mention of the rise of a multipolar world, of how the rise of East Asia, especially, the shift of the world’s industrial working class to China, Vietnam, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, along with Brazil and Mexico &#8212; in the view of many, that is the single biggest impediment to US economic dominance, of the capitalist markets’ expansion. </em></p>
<p><em>And that’s also the biggest threat that many of these end-timers, as you label them, are concerned about. They are concerned about China, yet China and its impact on US hegemony and capitalism is not mentioned at all in the book.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Well, I think that the threat of China is really, really central to the unimpeded AI rollout. It’s really the only argument they have. We do write about that in the book, but you’re right, it’s not the central focus of the book. We are more focused on the United States and the way in particular this is being pushed through Latin America, because we think there &#8212; and Europe.</p>
<p>But the threat of the multipolar world I do think is central, because the only argument that Donald Trump really has in the face of the threats that are now being articulated from inside the house, from inside the companies, is “But China, but China; if we don’t build it, they will.”</p>
<p>It’s completely untrue that deregulated AI has to be built the way it’s being built or else China will build it. China is much more open to regulating these technologies, to rules within the multilateral system. It’s the US that has been blowing up these agreements.</p>
<p>And when the Doomsday Clock was reset this year, it was a really &#8212; I mean, it’s always pretty harrowing, but this year it was particularly so; they moved it forward four seconds &#8212; and described not just the threats, whether it was biological weapons, nuclear weapons, AI, but the way the US government under Donald Trump was going after all of the international agreements that governments like China had been a party to, and just saying, “We don’t need them.”</p>
<p>So I think it’s the tools and the dismantling of any attempt to constrain those tools.</p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR: </em>It’s also about the narrative that the people in power are telling themselves. We’re tracking how there’s a certain embrace of apocalyptic narrative, of Armageddon, of the end times, that doesn’t &#8212; every government in the world doesn’t have that narrative, right? It’s something that’s very powerful in certain branches of the United States political class, in Israel, in parts of Latin America.</p>
<p>We’re not saying that it applies to every country around the entire world, and so that’s one reason that that isn’t &#8212; there are some very powerful international players that aren’t central to the thesis.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Astra and Naomi, you write about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel">Peter Thiel</a>, saying, “Today a staggering number of his former colleagues and acolytes occupy powerful positions in every part of the Trump Administration. The most consequential of them is JD Vance.” If you can explain, who is Peter Thiel? What does it mean to have his inner circle populating the inner circle of the United States? </em></p>
<p><em>And talk about all of these figures that are so much in the news now, that were standing behind President Trump during his inauguration, people who were opposed to him before, who took him off their platforms. We are talking about people like Jeff Bezos, people like Mark Zuckerberg and others.</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR: </em>Yes. Peter Thiel is a powerful billionaire and venture capitalist who has been in Silicon Valley for a long time. He is part of the PayPal mafia so he founded PayPal with David Sacks, who was Trump’s former AI and crypto czar. And also Elon Musk, of course, who is now the president of SpaceX; everybody will know him.</p>
<p>Peter Thiel is quite interesting because he has been on the far right very proudly for a long time since he was an undergraduate at Stanford when he and David Sacks actually wrote a book against political correctness. And he has been on the vanguard of being very much against democracy, very &#8212; quasi-libertarian but now just explicitly authoritarian &#8212; and has written things like “Democracy and freedom are incompatible.”</p>
<p>He was one of the first figures in Silicon Valley to come out for Trump in 2015.</p>
<p>And as we write in the book and, as you said, many of his protégés are now in positions of power and the most influential one is JD Vance. JD Vance has written about how his life changed when he saw Peter Thiel give a lecture. This lecture inspired Vance to go to Silicon Valley to become a venture capitalist &#8212; not a very illustrious one &#8212; and that’s where he met critical figures who would fund his political rise, including Thiel who gave what was a record-breaking donation of $15 million and kind of launched and made possible Vance’s bid to become a senator of Ohio.</p>
<p>And it was Peter Thiel who also brokered the meeting at Mar-a-Lago where Vance was able to apologise for calling Donald Trump “Hitler”. So Vance is of course one of those figures who used to be opposed &#8212;</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Explain that? That Vance said &#8212;</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR:</em> Yeah, Vance was once &#8212; he was once for green energy. He was against Donald Trump who he said misleads people and offers empty promises like building a wall which won’t actually improve people’s lives. But he’s also quite an opportunist, and Peter Thiel brokered peace among those two, and now we know Vance as the VP.</p>
<p>J.D. Vance is also critical in our book because he is who helped bring together the AI industry and Donald Trump. We remember from Donald Trump’s first term that he was against Big Tech. He was railing against Big Tech all the time. Thanks to JD Vance who hosted a dinner at David Sacks’ house, Trump got on the AI train. It was a fundraiser but it was also a pitch session.</p>
<p>Vance’s Silicon Valley brethren told Donald Trump that AI would be good for the economy but it would be very good for the fossil fuel sector. And now we see that the Trump administration is all in on AI and not much else.</p>
<p>So when we look at the famous image of the second Trump inauguration and we see all those tech execs given their front seats and they’re lined up, our position is that it was the promise of generative AI eating the economy that actually turned them fascist and caused this incredible alliance with the Trump regime that we’re seeing.</p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Yeah, that alliance has served them incredibly well. It has produced the first trillionaire. It has produced companies that are claiming valuations roughly equivalent to the entire US economy. And what they wanted from Donald Trump was exactly what they got: a frontier.</p>
<p>You hear this phrase used all the time now &#8212; ”frontier AI” &#8212; but if you think about what a frontier is, a frontier is a Wild West. It has no rules. And what they were upset about under the last administration was that there were some, you know, not radical, very simple rules like you have to label deepfakes, guardrails against precisely the scenarios that they are now talking about in terms of integration with weapons systems, and the prospect of a rogue AI.</p>
<p>So all of this was on the table years ago. There were discussions at the United Nations.</p>
<p>It’s interesting that they’re always using China as the bogeyman of why they have to roll out AI without rules. China has many more rules regulating AI than the United States has,<br />
including rules around not allowing children to have these like personal relationships with AI where there’s confusion about whether or not you are talking to a friend or a robot or a therapist or whatever it is.</p>
<p>First of all, that’s a lie, and that’s just the fact that people are not educated about what China is doing that is allowing people to fall for this line of, like, “Oh, no, if we don’t do it, China will.” They just simply don’t know how China is regulating this.</p>
<p>But one of the things I’ve been thinking about is &#8212; and we have to be aware of how active this push was for the frontier, because now of course these CEOs are all coming forward and saying “Please regulate us, we’ll regulate ourselves, we know we need to be regulated,” as if they weren’t the ones who not only demanded this Wild West frontier but bankrolled it and created the strategic alliance with Donald Trump so that he would deliver it to them.</p>
<p>And now they’re realising, “OK, maybe we’ve gone too far and have to look more credible.” And Donald Trump is going, “No way.”</p>
<p>Why is he saying, “No way”? Because he has tanked the entire US economy and the only thing he has going for him is the AI stock bubble, and he’s terrified of this bubble bursting all over him before the midterm elections or before the next presidential.</p>
<p>He also is very invested in it personally. He’s richer than he has ever been because of the rampant corruption of this administration, the money he has made from crypto but also many different ways that he and his family are invested in AI.</p>
<p>So that’s why he’s doing these frantic things like calling Jensen Huang on stage to say, “Don’t worry, we’re not going to do anything.”</p>
<p>But if you’ll allow me, I was really struck because there’s this myth that &#8212; these sort of parables of the technology slipping out of the hands of the men who built it, right? The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, Frankenstein. Creating a monster right?</p>
<p>That’s the myth that they’re all telling. “Oh no, we’ve created this powerful monster. It’s out of our hands and now it’s going to destroy us.” I would argue that that myth really is coming true but the monster is not AI; it’s Donald Trump.</p>
<p>They created Donald Trump, he is their monster, he’s out of control and he just won’t stop. And they’re like, “Wait a minute, maybe it is going too fast.”</p>
<p>[MUSIC BREAK]</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, the War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman with Juan González. We are spending the hour with Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor, co-authors of the new book </em>End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World<em>. I want to go back to the video that was released in conjunction with the book.</em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>NAOMI KLEIN:</strong> On a mountaintop in the dead of winter, a group of faithful men gathered an audience to share their vision. They had seen a gleaming city bathed in golden light.</p>
<p>The city would be filled with buildings so beautiful they would seem to float above the earth as if descended from heaven. Their vision already had a name.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> New Gaza.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>JARED KUSHNER:</strong> So, we’ll see if these things work. They never usually work.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NAOMI KLEIN:</strong> The mountaintop in question was the resort town of Davos. The faithful men presenting their vision were US real estate moguls Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP:</strong> Well, this is a very exciting day. See, I’m a real estate person at heart and it’s all about location. Look at this beautiful piece of property.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> Let’s just plan for catastrophic success.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>NAOMI KLEIN:</strong> Out of the horrors of a live-streamed genocide, an exclusive paradise was about to emerge fully formed.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>PERSON:</strong> We’ve already started removing the rubble and doing some of the demolition.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Part of the video that was released with the book </em>End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World<em>. It is by Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor. I want to talk about Gaza right now. We are coming off &#8212; in Venice right now you have two Israeli filmmakers, Rachel Szor and Yuval Abraham, who just came out with a film called </em>NAZA<em> and now members of the Israeli government are threatening to take away their citizenship, and it was based on the commentary of high-level Israeli officials, unnamed, talking about the killing in Gaza deliberately. Naomi Klein?</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> Yeah, and the use of AI to do so. I actually haven’t seen the film. I’m definitely looking to see it. But it underlines what we already know thanks to Palestinian journalists at huge personal cost in the documenting of a livestream genocide.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Over 250 of them killed in this last two years.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN:</em> And as we say in the film, this is the story that the Trump administration is telling, is that out of apocalypse there will be this paradise. There will be what they are calling “New Gaza”. We begin the book with it because it is such an extreme distillation of the story.</p>
<p>And I believe it’s the most dangerous story ever told. It’s a biblical story. It’s deeply encoded in our culture whether we’re religious or not. And the story is first comes the flood, first comes the apocalypse, first comes the mass death &#8212; and out of the mass death, the great cleansing, the fury of god, comes the golden city, the paradise, for the chosen few.</p>
<p>That story, which &#8212; it’s the story of the flood and the ark; it’s told in its most violent form in the book of Revelation &#8212; for people who believe in it literally, it has confused the difference between bad and good. It has kind of flipped the switch, where when we see the things in our world that should be warning us, telling us we need to act, we are in a time of crisis, it is an emergency &#8212; whether it’s climate disasters, whether it’s covid, that things are breaking down &#8212; that what is seen instead are signs.</p>
<p>“Oh, no, what it means is that we’re entering the end times.” And while that may be bad for many people, it’s actually very good for the chosen few.</p>
<p>That’s why we started with this myth of New Gza . . . there is no paradise that is coming out of the apocalypse in Gaza but that is the story that the Trump administration is telling. It’s a privatized paradise that they’re proposing to build. They are using this kind of biblical narrative but of course it’s all for profit because it’s the Trump administration. They want to build luxury condominiums over a mass grave. And you saw there that it’s a literal story.</p>
<p>We do think that the Board of Peace is significant in the sort of evolution of the privatisation of the state, the fact that the Trump Administration is not just attacking the United Nations and defunding the United Nations but trying to replace the United Nations with something called the Board of Peace, which Trump would be head of for life, that they would control &#8212; they would give themselves immunity.</p>
<p>This is part of what we mean by bunkering, by escaping. It’s like they see the state as a mine site. They see the United States as a place that they can extract from. Not just extract wealth and resources &#8212; and we’re watching them do that &#8212; but also extract other things that matter to them, like legal immunity. Right? I mean, the Board of Peace gives them that.</p>
<p>So that’s why we start with that. And it brings together these different parts of the coalition. Because there are religious extremists, both Christian Zionists and messianic Jews, who really do believe that Gaza, Iran &#8212; mean that the Messiah is coming. Like the more violent, the better.</p>
<p>And you’ve covered on the show officers in the US military lodging complaints that their officers are telling them that they should welcome apocalyptic levels of violence in Iran because it means that Jesus is returning.</p>
<p>But it’s not just the religious extremists. It’s also the secular versions of the story. We don’t think Trump believes in the biblical version of this story, but we do believe he believes in a kind of a wealth rapture. And when you see those AI-generated images of new Gaza and Trump sharing them, you can see how these stories have distorted his brain.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: In the little time we have left, I’m wondering if you could talk a little bit about the resistance movements, the people’s movements against this growing fascism, and also perhaps deal with some of the critiques of let’s say of Marxists like John Bellamy Foster, who basically insists that the fascist movement in the United States, the mass base of it is really the middle class, those people driven out by the Walmarts and the Targets from small businesses, and franchisees and others who have been driven down by the growth of these top-end monopoly capitalists and who have now turned to a fascist movement for their salvation.</em></p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR:</em> To answer the second part first, fascism is always a movement of the injured powerful. It is a movement that creates vertical solidarity between political and corporate elites and people who are not the worst off but feel that they’ve lost status and directs their sense of insecurity downwards further towards vulnerable scapegoats &#8212; towards immigrants, towards trans kids, towards feminists &#8212; instead of upwards at the oligarchs and the politicians.</p>
<p>So that’s how we understand Elon Musk buying X or what was Twitter, right, is that it was a way for him to control a media ecosystem and help direct that rage downwards at the left and at the vulnerable instead of letting it be harnessed towards people like him.</p>
<p>So I think that that’s right, if fascism creates what we call a vertical solidarity to protect capitalism, to protect the status quo. That’s certainly true of fascism in the past and it’s certainly true today.</p>
<p>What we have to do to build the resistance is create that horizontal solidarity, to not scapegoat the vulnerable, to build our own coalition and find our own unusual bedfellows. I think you see that in the resistance to fascism that’s growing in the United States and around the world.</p>
<p>One thing &#8212; Naomi said this &#8212; the people we’re tracking &#8212; end-times fascism is not a coherent ideology necessarily. It’s not a monolith. It’s a fractious alliance of these three groups: the religious end timers, the tech accelerationists, the ethnonationalists.</p>
<p>But what they have in common is this sense that things are going to be increasingly unstable. We say that they’re both building their arks and they’re causing the floods. They’re accelerating collapse. They’ve decided to just bring it on and abandon this shared world in their various fantasies about bunker nation or ascending to heaven or the digital class.</p>
<p>So the resistance fundamentally needs to be grounded in a desire to stay here on Earth, to commit to this place. We describe them at one point in the book as traitors to creation. And we don’t use that word “traitors” lightly. We are saying they’re not traitors to the flag or the nation but actually to life on Earth, to our shared humanity, our shared planet.</p>
<p>And I think we see that commitment to what we call “hereness” in the book in the movement against data centers that is sweeping the nation, in the resistance to ICE where people are saying, “No, I’m going to defend my community, defend my neighbors” and people standing up and fighting for labour rights, which fascists are always attacking.</p>
<p>Fighting for the environment, fighting against detention centers.</p>
<p>And so we see the resistance growing all over the world, but I think that the data center revolt is the main one for us because it really draws new lines and shows people &#8212; is bringing people together who a year ago or a couple of years ago might have been fighting over culture war issues.</p>
<p>Now they’re saying, “Well, actually, we have a lot in common because there’s a class of people who actually want to replace us with robots. Maybe we should be on the side of humanity against the machines.”</p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN: </em>Including those small business people, Juan, who you were referring to. This is why it really is an opportunity to form those new alliances. Because Donald Trump has betrayed many of the people who did vote for him the first time. The trouble, of course, is that many powerful Democrats are also taking money from the large tech companies and so are not willing to harvest what has been called by a comedian in I believe it was Madison &#8212; ”the most bipartisan issue since beer” is the opposition to these tech companies.</p>
<p>But in order to gain political advantage from that huge bipartisan issue, you have to be willing to go against your donors or not take their money in the first place.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Naomi, the business model of these AI fascists, if they were to be able to prevail, throw millions of people out of work, how will they make their money? Because obviously Henry Ford, back in the days of the early monopoly capitalism, believed you had to give workers a living wage so they could consume the products that you produced.</em></p>
<p><em>NAOMI KLEIN: </em>Well, I’m not sure it’s all that thought through. I think that they think they’re mainly going to be selling products to other businesses in the short term. But this is why, Juan, it is a bubble, and it is a process of extraction, and the bubble is rigged to explode all over working people and their pensions right now.</p>
<p><em>ASTRA TAYLOR:</em> Yeah, I think they also think that they’ll make a lot of money hooking up with the government and the military. There is a quote from Alex Karp &#8212; who is a colleague of Peter Thiel, CEO of Palantir &#8212; and he said &#8212; we quote him in the book saying, “If these tech companies think they’re going to take everybody’s jobs and then not work with the military, they are” &#8212; I’m going to change what he said and say &#8212; ”they are foolish.”</p>
<p>What he’s saying is essentially if you’re planning to build a technology that causes a job apocalypse, you are also going to have to align with the state and help build the mechanisms to police and control and contain the masses of dispossessed human beings.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to end with the end of your book: “We didn’t choose to be born into a fight quite so fateful but we have reached a choice point. We can either follow end-times fascists into oblivion or we can commit to building the unruly, boundary-crossing movement they so deeply fear, one that wrests away their weapons, holds them accountable for their crimes, and defends the paradise of here.”</em></p>
<p>Those are the words of Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor, co-authors of the new book out this week, <em>End Times Fascism: And the Fight for the Living World</em>.</p>
<p><em>The original content of this programme and article is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t Democrats outshine a dangerous, unstable, delusional, egomaniacal Trump?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/15/why-cant-democrats-outshine-a-dangerous-unstable-delusional-egomaniacal-trump/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egomania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Nader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support for Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Israel attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Israel war machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Because former president Joe Biden backed Israel&#8217;s genocidal Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump avoids accurately accusing Biden of aiding and abetting genocide. Tyrant Trump has continued providing powerful weapons and unconditional political backing, writes Ralph Nader for Common Dreams. ANALYSIS: By Ralph Nader In his rambling and incoherent remarks for nearly two hours over two nights ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Because former president Joe Biden backed Israel&#8217;s <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine+Gaza">genocidal Benjamin Netanyahu</a>, Donald Trump avoids accurately accusing Biden of aiding and abetting genocide. Tyrant Trump has continued providing powerful weapons and unconditional political backing, writes Ralph Nader for <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/"><strong>Common Dreams</strong></a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Ralph Nader</em></p>
<p>In his rambling and incoherent remarks for nearly two hours over two nights before a knee-jerk crowd in Dallas last week, Trump provided ample evidence that he is a dangerously unstable, delusional, egomaniacal, and megalomaniacal personality.</p>
<p>He pushed for this unusual midterm <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/gop">GOP</a> convention to shore up his dwindling faithful followers and get out the votes in what is likely to be a losing midterm election for <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/republicans">Republicans</a> in the House and maybe the Senate on November 3, 2026.</p>
<p>That is, if Trump fails to steal the election, as a 22 single-spaced-page account published by the <em><a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/washington">Washington</a> Spectator </em>documented in alarming detail (see <a href="https://us.list-manage.com/ZekE3vY2yuP?e=8e411e9705&amp;c2id=8e3459eb78ddc0e9b4695a09351ef532" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dancing in the Dark, Part 4</a> by Mark Medish and Joel McCleary).</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/15/us-supreme-court-rejects-trump-mail-ballot-restrictions-ahead-of-midterms"><strong>READ MORE: </strong> US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions ahead of midterms</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/12/war-on-terror-how-9-11-changed-the-language-of">‘War on terror’: How 9/11 changed the language of conflict</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Palestine+Gaza">Other Palestine, Gaza reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://us.list-manage.com/8JYVX001Eah?e=8e411e9705&amp;c2id=8e3459eb78ddc0e9b4695a09351ef532" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CNN reported</a> that Trump brazenly urged his followers “to ‘cheat like hell’ to help Republicans keep control of Congress… and asked supporters to treat November’s elections as if he were on the ballot”.</p>
<p>Trump certainly lied like hell as he repeated again and again his standard lies about the Trump economy and the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/why-can-t-democrats-defeat-trump">United States’ standing in the world</a>.</p>
<p>He lied about the number of illegal aliens entering the US and the crimes they have committed during the Democratic administration.</p>
<p>He lied about “bringing food prices and almost every other item rapidly coming down,” … “no tax on Social Security,” “the US is producing more <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/oil">oil</a> and gas than Russia and <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/saudi-arabia">Saudi Arabia</a> combined,” “sixty-five billion barrels [of oil] in <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/venezuela">Venezuela</a> are ours,” “raking in trillions of dollars in tariffs” “making [America] richer than we ever thought,” “we now pay the lowest prices in the entire world for prescription drugs,” labeled the Democrats “communists” when he extorted companies to give the federal government part ownership as he courts and praises two communist dictators &#8212; Russian President <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/vladimir-putin">Vladimir Putin</a> and North Korea’s Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un.</p>
<p><strong>Unfunded fake promises</strong><br />
Then there are the legally questionable and unfunded fake promises to give every adult $5000 if the GOP wins Congress in November.</p>
<p>He boasts of having the greatest military in the world as he approves the firing of seasoned, experienced generals and admirals who might question the sanity of his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who calls himself “a warrior of God in the service of Jesus Christ,” while running out of ammunition in the service of Israel’s mass murdering <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/genocide">genocide</a> of Gaza’s civilian <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/children">children</a>, mothers, and fathers.</p>
<figure id="attachment_128078" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-128078" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-128078 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide.png" alt="&quot;The message is clear to every current or aspiring Republican politician: Be a toady to Trump, or you’re out.&quot;" width="680" height="502" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide-300x221.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide-80x60.png 80w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Donald-Trump-RR-680wide-569x420.png 569w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-128078" class="wp-caption-text">Trump’s practice is to mix lavish praise for loyalists by name while assailing opponents with scurrilous libels. Image: robertreich.substack.com</figcaption></figure>
<p>Trump lied about named Democratic politicians and wildly praised Ken Paxton as the greatest state attorney-general in history. Paxton is a crook, having been impeached by his own party in the state House, but was acquitted by the Senate.</p>
<p>Conviction on any article required a two-thirds vote &#8212; 21 of the 30 eligible senators. Paxton escaped conviction by seven votes.</p>
<p>Trump viciously exaggerated Joe Biden’s physical mobility and mental condition and falsely claimed the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/biden-administration">Biden administration</a> wrecked America in all ways. This is the same polite <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/joe-biden">Joe Biden</a> who transferred power in the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/white-house">White House</a> on January 20, 2025, greeting Trump with “Welcome Home”.</p>
<p>Because Biden backed the same genocidal Netanyahu, Trump avoids accurately accusing Biden of aiding and abetting genocide. Tyrant Trump has continued providing powerful weapons and unconditional political backing.</p>
<p>Trump’s practice is to mix lavish praise for loyalists by name while assailing opponents with scurrilous libels, including two Senate Democratic candidates, Roy Cooper of North Carolina and Abdul El-Sayed (typically mocking his last name) of Michigan.</p>
<p><strong>Zig zag displays on Newsmax</strong><br />
On frantic zig zag displays at his podium, faithfully played on Newsmax &#8212; the very biased and often slanderous channel built for Trumpism &#8212; were vivid demonstrations of his megalomania and egomania.</p>
<p>Trump told the crowd on September 9, 2026, that “everybody loves me, and I love everybody.” The following evening, he asked supporters to raise their right hands and recite a pledge to “the greatest president in the history of the United States” &#8212; a reference to himself.</p>
<p>Perhaps these are his greatest lies, as he wrecks the lives of the poor, federal civil servants, firefighters, scientists, the sick and injured who needed insurance and benefits, and key protective and nurturing programmes for children in both Red and Blue states and overseas in <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/africa">Africa</a> and Asia.</p>
<p>For some reason needing psychiatric explanation, he hates and undermines wind power and solar energy, while embracing oil and gas, “clean, beautiful coal” to worsen global omnicidal warming.</p>
<p>With his polls plunging and his postings on his misnamed “Truth Social” further bolstering the assessment of his worsening mental stability by 30 credentialed mental health professionals &#8212; both Democrats and Republicans (see April 30, 2026 of <a href="https://us.list-manage.com/qgPdrmrLy9S?e=8e411e9705&amp;c2id=8e3459eb78ddc0e9b4695a09351ef532" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Congressional Record</em></a>), Trump is running out of words like “lunatics,” “fanatics,” and “maniacs” to tarnish his critics with descriptions that apply to his own zany, lying, corrupt, violent, treacherous, law-violating, vengeful, obsessive, reality-faking daily impeachable behaviors.</p>
<p>His endless self-naming mania went viral with his planting American flags on a map covering Canada, <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/greenland">Greenland</a>, Mexico, Iceland, <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/cuba">Cuba</a> and Jamaica.</p>
<p>The man, with his finger on the nuclear trigger, who calls violent climate intensities “a hoax” and scoffs at scientists’ warning of coming pandemics, is openly and proudly out of control.</p>
<p>It is time to fire Duplicitous Doubling-down Donald.</p>
<p>Ponder why the <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/tag/democratic-party">Democratic Party</a> is befuddled without a coherent way of responding to “crazy Donald” or a coherent, authentic pledge to the American people about what they intend to do for and with them should they regain control of Congress and the Presidency.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.commondreams.org/author/ralph-nader">Ralph Nader</a> is a consumer advocate and the author of The Seventeen Solutions: Bold Ideas for Our American Future (2012). His new book is, Wrecking America: How Trump&#8217;s Lies and Lawbreaking Betray All (2020, co-authored with Mark Green). Republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ elections: Where are much-needed party policies on media?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/15/nz-elections-where-are-much-needed-party-policies-on-media/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign digital players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace inequity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media organisations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ elections 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ media policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of journalism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[KNIGHTLY VIEWS: By Gavin Ellis Two months out from New Zealand&#8217;s general election, and we have yet to see new policy from any of the seven main political parties on media and communication. Only the Greens have a media policy on their website &#8212; and it is effectively a repeat of the 2023 policy that ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="https://knightlyviews.com/">KNIGHTLY VIEWS</a>:</strong> <em>By Gavin Ellis</em></p>
<p>Two months out from New Zealand&#8217;s general election, and we have yet to see new policy from any of the seven main political parties on media and communication.</p>
<p>Only the Greens have a media policy on their website &#8212; and it is effectively a repeat of the 2023 policy that was heavy on high-minded rhetoric but very light on functional detail. No party has yet presented voters with practical initiatives that take account of the significant shifts in the media industry since the last election.</p>
<p>Admittedly, this is not the sort of policy that will sway voters, but manifestos are more than vote-grabbers. They represent commitments by each party to use their best endeavours during the coming Parliamentary term to give effect to what they say they will do in the interests of the public good.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gavin+Ellis"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Gavin Ellis articles on media</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Unless there is a sudden avalanche of media policy promises, the signal the parties are sending is that, in this area of public policy, they plan to do very little.</p>
<p>I do not believe our politicians are unaware of the precarious state of journalism in this country. They have been lobbied by every media organisation and left in no doubt that the cuts that have kept newsrooms in operation are not sustainable in even the medium term.</p>
<p>The have been warned we will see the loss of significant news publications and news broadcasts within the term of the next government unless there is a reset. The playing field needs to be levelled to overcome the pernicious effects of uncontrolled foreign digital players in our media market.</p>
<p>Those effects are not only financial. They include significant civic, social and cultural consequences. We have already suffered damage caused by years of political inaction and ineffectiveness, but believe me, worse will come unless significant change is forthcoming.</p>
<p><strong>Comfortable with less scrutiny</strong><br />
One of my worries is that, irrespective of high-minded utterances about the importance of journalism to democracy, most politicians are comfortable with less scrutiny of their activities by journalists than with an enhanced ability to speak truth to power.</p>
<p>Too many politicians, and the functionaries who spread their messages, mistakenly believe that their responsibility to keeping the public informed is met by speaking directly to constituents through social media and email lists, and that news media are no longer needed.</p>
<p>They are mistaken because scrutiny is the missing element in that interpretation of their social contract. Scrutiny includes ferreting out those matters of public interest that politicians would prefer you do not see or hear.</p>
<p>There is also a prevailing view that commercial news media are creatures of the marketplace and should, like any other business, stand or fall on the basis of their ability to sell goods or services.</p>
<p>Under the model prevailing when they were created, that is a valid viewpoint. However, that model is broken and has been dysfunctional long enough for some parts of it to become almost irretrievable.</p>
<p>Some will say that is the nature of the marketplace &#8212; ever changing and requiring nimble business practices to keep pace. It is only to be expected that some businesses will fail because they do not (or cannot) adapt.</p>
<p>Again, that is a valid viewpoint. But it is one that does not recognise two things. The first is the civic and social roles that news media play in a society that requires diverse and independent sources of information to properly function. The second is the inequity of a marketplace in which foreign players can plunder content with impunity and avoid the taxes and regulations that burden domestic media.</p>
<p><strong>Untouchable foreign players</strong><br />
Beyond the marketplace are the social harms that are undeniably caused by those apparently untouchable foreign players and the as-yet-unquantifiable effects of their use of artificial intelligence.</p>
<p>The present government’s introduction (not passage) of legislation to introduce an Australian model under-16 ban on social media appears to be a calculated pre-election move, rather than an earnest attempt to deal with the problem (see below).</p>
<p>That Bill may look as if we are catching up with other countries on media policy, but the reality is that we have been left far behind. Inaction and widespread political indifference could see an incoming government face a firestorm of compounding consequences.</p>
<p>There are eight areas that all political parties need to address. I would like to think they could reach consensus on most of them.</p>
<p>The first is to create an enforceable environment that will allow all news organisations to negotiate financial compensation from foreign digital platforms for the use of content. That use would include search and social media plus large language models and other artificial intelligence assets.</p>
<p>The Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill that has lain dormant in Parliament throughout the term of the present government should be resurrected, updated to bring its provisions in line with those of Australia, and extended to account for developments in artificial intelligence.</p>
<p>The second is to enforce the provisions of the OECD profit shifting framework to impose a tax on revenue that is currently moved offshore in the form of service payments. The resulting impost, which would be in addition to the money negotiated by news organisations, should be used to finance non-profit local and iwi news initiatives.</p>
<p><strong>Sustaining local newsrooms</strong><br />
The third is the adoption of policies to help sustain local newsrooms. Two initiatives should be considered. Firstly, the State of California’s Community Newsroom Employment and Workforce Sustainability Act which will provide refundable tax credits to local newsrooms for each journalist they employ.</p>
<p>Such measures could be used to help sustain local and iwi news outlets. The Californian legislation, which passed the Senate and Assembly by overwhelming majorities and is awaiting Governor Gavin Newsom’s signature, extends eligibility to print, broadcast, digital, nonprofit, and independent family-owned news outlets. It is regarded as a blueprint for other states to follow.</p>
<p>Secondly, there is a British initiative that allows local authority rates relief on local news premises. The virtue of policies such as these is that they are effectively revenue neutral. Without the help, the newsrooms would not exist.</p>
<p>The fourth policy relates to public media. The amalgamation of Radio New Zealand and Television New Zealand should be resurrected in light of TVNZ’s increasingly problematic advertising revenue base and the need to affect cost savings in both organisations.</p>
<p>The funding system for both organisations, together with Whakaata Māori and Iwi Radio, should be reviewed and consideration given to triennial funding.</p>
<p>The fifth policy should be a comprehensive review of the future of terrestrial broadcasting and the consequences of moves to digital-only delivery. Its deliberations should include possible disenfranchising of the elderly and poor; the impact on Māori broadcasting; the impact on TVNZ news services that could arise in a move to video streaming on demand; and the consequential uses of radio spectrum.</p>
<p>The sixth policy should be an urgent review of the harmful effects of social media that would include, but not be limited to, the effects on those under the age of 16. The proposed ban is based on that currently enacted in Australia, which has been been ineffective. Australia’s internet regulator, eSafety, last month issued the results of a study that found that more than eight in 10 Australian under-16s are continuing to use social media despite the ban.</p>
<p><strong>Platform operators as publishers</strong><br />
The review should consider deeming social media platform operators to be publishers (on the basis that their algorithms and AI tools manipulate content and determine audiences) and liable for infringements of law and regulation.</p>
<p>The seventh policy initiative should be a comprehensive review of media regulation and the development of an independent framework for complaint and adjudication. The review should embrace not only local media but also foreign-controlled digital platforms with New Zealand user bases over a certain size. Pending the adoption of findings from the review, existing regulatory bodies (state and industry-led) should remain in place.</p>
<p>Finally, any policies relating to artificial intelligence should make specific reference to news media, the integrity of news content, and intellectual property rights. It should include measures to limit the spread of disinformation, the verification and validation of legitimate news content produced by journalists, and the identification of AI-generated content.</p>
<p>Our political parties &#8212; and the public &#8212; need to understand the consequences of failing to deal effectively with what will become increasingly existential issues for journalism. Perhaps their starting point should be a general enquiry into the viability of New Zealand journalism and our media infrastructure, even if it tells them what some of us already know.</p>
<div><a href="https://knightlyviews.com/about-ua-158210565-2/"><em>Dr Gavin Ellis</em></a><em> holds a PhD in political studies. He is a media consultant and researcher. A former editor-in-chief of </em>The New Zealand Herald<em>, he has a background in journalism and communications — covering both editorial and management roles — that spans more than half a century. This article was published first on his </em><a href="https://knightlyviews.com/"><em>Knightly Views</em></a><em> website on 15 September 2026 and is republished with permission.</em></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pacific remembering September 11 . . .  25 years on</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/12/pacific-remembering-september-11-25-years-on/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 06:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[25th anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papali'i Mele Maualaivao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNZ Pacific Waves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twin Towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Trade Centre]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Susana Suisuiki of RNZ Pacific The 9/11 attacks on the United States claimed thousands of lives, stunned the world, and triggered responses that continue to shape global politics, security, and public life today. A series of coordinated attacks in the United States killed almost 3000 people, with planes hijacked and crashing in Pennsylvania, the ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Susana Suisuiki of <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/pacific/1350076/remembering-september-11-25-years-on">RNZ Pacific</a></em></p>
<div class="p-4">
<div class="space-y-3 article-body">
<p>The 9/11 attacks on the United States claimed thousands of lives, stunned the world, and triggered responses that continue to shape global politics, security, and public life today.</p>
<p>A series of coordinated attacks in the United States killed almost 3000 people, with planes hijacked and crashing in Pennsylvania, the Pentagon in Washington DC, and most prominently, the World Trade Center in New York City.</p>
<p>While the world watched in horror at the unfolding events, the <a href="https://archivesfoundation.org/newsletter/911-in-photos/">memories of 9/11 are etched in the minds</a> of those who survived or witnessed the attacks. That day is especially personal for Samoan Papali&#8217;i Mele Maualaivao who was living in Brooklyn at the time.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA_WOgci0z4"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> How 9/11 permanently reshaped US and global security</a></li>
<li>&#8216;<a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2026/9/11/everything-changed-the-human-cost-of-25-years-of-us-wars">Everything changed&#8217;: The human cost of 25 years of US wars</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/734/937">Freedom of speech: From 9/11 to Fiji coups, a shocking and devastating tragedy &#8212;</a> <em>David Robie</em></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=9%2F11">Other 9/11 reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Papali&#8217;i, who is now living in Samoa and championing women through her work with United Nations Women, still vividly recalls one thing above all &#8212; the smell.</p>
<p>Speaking to <i>Pacific Waves</i> Papali&#8217;i said she first saw the smoke billowing from one of the Twin Towers on television that morning, believing a helicopter had crashed into the building. However, the situation became more devastating when both towers had collapsed, sending a vast cloud of ash and debris that engulfed the streets of New York.</p>
<p>The debris reached Brooklyn, right through the neighbourhood and onto the home Papali&#8217;i lived in.</p>
<p>&#8220;I remember seeing it raining down in my house, out around my house,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p><strong>Incinerated remains</strong><br />
&#8220;So, you would see little bits of paper that were obviously from offices, ash and there was just the smell of like incineration. At the time, we didn&#8217;t realise that we were smelling, you know, the incinerated remains of everybody who&#8217;d been trapped in that building.&#8221;</p>
<p>Papali&#8217;i said in the days after the attacks, the weight of the tragedy started to set in and she had set off to donate blood at the Red Cross but was told that no bodies had yet been pulled from the wreckage. New York became a surreal landscape of profound grief, thick dust and heightened security.</p>
<p>The aftermath of September 11 dominated news coverage, with Papali&#8217;i recalling seeing people interviewed on television making desperate appeals for information about their missing loved ones.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is before social media was really big right. So on the news every day, there&#8217;d be somebody being interviewed saying, &#8216;have you seen my mother?&#8217; &#8216;have you seen my father?&#8217; &#8216;have you seen my brother?&#8217; &#8216;have you seen my sister?&#8217; and there were people putting up posters up everywhere of relatives in hopes that some way or some how they were still alive.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, Papali&#8217;i knew of two individuals who died in the building and said the loss of lives had affected everybody even if they had not personally lost a close family member.</p>
<p>Twenty-five years later, Papali&#8217;i has not visited the memorial site despite making trips to New York since and said she doesn&#8217;t know if she&#8217;ll ever stop by as she feels the space is meant for families of those who died.</p>
<p>The events surrounding 9/11 has given Papali&#8217;i a greater appreciation of community and service which has continued on in her work in Samoa.</p>
<figure id="attachment_133451" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133451" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-133451" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall.png" alt="Photos captured by John Celardo, former archivist at the National Archives " width="500" height="766" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall-196x300.png 196w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/911-archive-AFO-500tall-274x420.png 274w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133451" class="wp-caption-text">Photos captured by John Celardo, former archivist at the National Archives branch in New York City on September 11, 2001. Image: National Archives Foundation</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Sense of unity</strong><br />
Living in a city of millions where people usually kept to themselves, the tragedy created an unexpected sense of unity. Papali&#8217;i said she now recognises the bravery of first responders, firefighters, police officers and other emergency workers who put themselves in dangerous situations to save others.</p>
<p>Her hope is that remembering the loss brought on by 9/11 will encourage people to be kinder instead of using it as fuel to hate.</p>
<p>&#8220;I hope people realise that these moments, while they can be really scary and horrific and because of social media, you have so many more images of what&#8217;s occurred. I hope it causes one to be kinder in just your everyday life.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mele&#8217;s experience was one of the Pacific connections to the attacks.</p>
<p>Two New Zealanders were among those killed &#8212; Auckland-born environmental lawyer Alan Beaven, who was aboard Flight 93 which crashed in Pennsylvania, and US-born John Lozowsky, a dual New Zealand citizen who worked in New Zealand during the 1990s, died in the collapse of the World Trade Center.</p>
<p>Their names are among the nearly 3000 people remembered at the 9/11 Memorial in New York.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="flex items-center border-t justify-between m-4 mt-0 pt-4">
<p><em>This story was first published on</em></p>
</div>
<div>
<div class="flex items-center border-t justify-between m-4 mt-0 pt-4"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="h-6 w-auto" src="https://connect.rnz.co.nz/rnz-logo.svg" alt="RNZ Connect Logo" width="130" height="69" data-nimg="1" /></div>
</div>
<div class="px-4 sm:pl-0 pt-4"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Zionists drop case against &#8216;truth&#8217; journalist Mary Kostakidis</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/12/australian-zionists-drop-case-against-truth-journalist-kostakidis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consortium News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Kostakidis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBS News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist Federation of Australia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Zionist Federation of Australia has withdrawn its case of &#8220;racial hatred&#8221; against Australian journalist Mary Kostakidis, who called it a victory for free speech, reports Consortium News. SPECIAL REPORT: By Joe Lauria After a two-year legal battle to punish a prominent Australian journalist for her public criticism of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the Zionist ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Zionist Federation of Australia has withdrawn its case of &#8220;racial hatred&#8221; against Australian journalist Mary Kostakidis, who called it a victory for free speech, reports <strong>Consortium News</strong>.<br />
</em><strong><br />
SPECIAL REPORT:</strong> <em>By Joe Lauria</em></p>
<p>After a two-year legal battle to punish a prominent Australian journalist for her public criticism of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, the Zionist Federation of Australia (ZFA) has withdrawn its case.</p>
<p>“This is a win for every Australian who values our democratic right to freedom of political expression,” Kostakidis said on X. “Zionist zealotry has had to beat a retreat from what was going to be a highly damaging trial.</p>
<p>“The purpose of journalism is to get to the truth &#8212; fearlessly &#8212; and to hold power to account. This is a win for press freedom, which has prevailed.“</p>
<p>Kostakidis, who anchored the SBS national news for nearly 20 years, was a high-profile target for the Zionist Federation in its quest to silence outrage over Israel’s conduct in Gaza.</p>
<p>Alon Cassuto, the ZFA chief executive who brought the case against Kostakidis, claimed on X that he withdrew it on Thursday to deprive her of a platform. He <a href="https://x.com/ZionistFedAus/status/2098199154619187588">wrote</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I do not intend to spend another year taking Ms Kostakidis’ repugnant commentary from the dark corners of the internet and giving it a Federal Court platform in her pursuit of martyrdom. My job here is done.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The majority of his statement was a continued attack on the journalist. He claimed that the action he brought against Kostakidis was satisfied by an apology she had issued. But that was two years ago and he pursued his case against her nonetheless.</p>
<p>What he did not mention is a recent series of court decisions in Australia by judges who upheld the right to criticise Zionism, which appears to have weakened his chances of winning.</p>
<p>Kostakidis had also won approval for full discovery of ZFA communications.</p>
<p>In claiming victory, Kostakidis wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Watching a people live stream their own genocide while the international community responsible for creating this mess offers the victims sympathy and the perpetrators bombs, diplomatic cover and impunity, has been disgusting.</p>
<p>&#8220;Thank you to the Jewish and Israeli people all over the world raging against this in recognition our common humanity trumps any form of tribalism.</p>
<p>&#8220;Australia must stop disregarding the Orders of the International Court of Justice which were clear: we are obliged under international law to take meaningful action to prevent genocide in Palestine and to do all in our power to bring about an end to apartheid.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hypocrisy, double standards and a lack of courage are aiding the destruction of a framework intended to protect against the worst excesses of state power.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Joe Lauria is editor-in-chief of </em><em>Consortium News and a former UN correspondent for </em>The Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe,<em> and other newspapers, including </em>The Montreal Gazette<em>, the </em>London Daily Mail <em>and </em>The Star<em> of Johannesburg. He was an investigative reporter for the </em>Sunday Times<em> of London.</em></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Breaking: Zionists legal proceedings against me have been withdrawn after a 2 year battle.</p>
<p>This is a win for every Australian who values our democratic right to freedom of political expression. Zionist zealotry has had to beat a retreat from what was going to be a highly…</p>
<p>— <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4a7.png" alt="💧" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />Mary Kostakidis (@MaryKostakidis) <a href="https://x.com/MaryKostakidis/status/2098198663189446710?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>In citizen responses to this article published by <em>Consortium News</em>:</p>
<div class="comment-author"><em>Anthony Kevin (September 11, 2026):</em></div>
<div class="comment-text">
<p>Whatever Cassuto’s rationalisations for their withdrawal, the Australian Zionist cause is bound to suffer big reputational damage over this. I am sure Joe Lauria is right that they ended the case because after the recent decision by NSW Supreme Judge Fagan, they were going to find it a hard case to sustain.</p>
<p>Especially as Zionist Israel keeps on humiliating and exploiting Australian governments and elites.</p>
<p>Mary was looking more and more like Joan of Arc. And the Zionists more and more like Torquemada of the Spanish Inquisition.</p>
<p><em>Graeme D (September 11, 2026):<br />
</em>Mary stood where no Australian legacy MSM dared stand. Sycophants one and all, so ready to bend.</p>
<p>She showed courage and a dedication to telling the truth about a genocide when Australian legacy outlets banned journalists from using that word, even after the ICC unequivocally declared that a &#8220;plausible genocide&#8221; was being perpetrated.</p>
<p>Mary stood where most MPs feared to stand.</p>
<p>As Hunter S. Thompson &#8212; another fearless journalist &#8212; wrote, “anyone who goes to caught takes a wolf by the ears.”</p>
<p>Mary did this, and is one of the few to &#8220;win&#8221; at probably a heavy personal cost.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caitlin Johnstone: Three major revelations about the Gaza holocaust in the Israeli press</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/11/caitlin-johnstone-three-major-revelations-about-the-gaza-holocaust-in-the-israeli-press/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Accords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caitlin Johnstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptian intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haaretz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samir Mashharawi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Arab Emirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahya Sinwar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone The Israeli press has published three significant revelations about the Gaza holocaust, reporting (1) that Benjamin Netanyahu concealed advanced knowledge of the Hamas attack on October 7, (2) that Israel rejected a Hamas offer to release all civilian hostages immediately after October 7, and (3) that according to an IDF drone ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>The Israeli press has published three significant revelations about the Gaza holocaust, reporting (1) that Benjamin Netanyahu concealed advanced knowledge of the Hamas attack on October 7, (2) that Israel rejected a Hamas offer to release all civilian hostages immediately after October 7, and (3) that according to an IDF drone operator, the Israeli military was intentionally firing on civilians throughout Gaza during its operations in the Palestinian territory.</p>
<p>The first two come from a <em>Haaretz</em> article titled “<a href="https://archive.is/rX9Zj" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Revealed: Netanyahu Received an Explicit Warning Days Before Oct. 7. He Didn’t Brief Israel’s Security Chiefs</a>”, which was released ahead of an upcoming <em>Haaretz</em> book about the hostage standoff in Gaza.</p>
<p>Haaretz describes a call between Netanyahu and UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, citing three foreign senior sources:</p>
<blockquote><p>“A week and a half before October 7, 2023 the Emirati ruler called Netanyahu from the Presidential Palace in Abu Dhabi and spoke with him for 45 minutes. In that conversation, bin Zayed warned that Hamas’ leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, was planning a major operation against Israel.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bin Zayed expressed concern that the event in question would not only lead to bloodshed but also destabilise the entire region and undermine the Abraham Accords.”</p></blockquote>
<figure></figure>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtYNAFBoNFk" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>LISTEN</strong>: A reading by Tim Foley</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Haaretz</em> reports that rather than pass these warnings on to Israeli national security officials, Netanyahu chose to sit on information which an unnamed Shin Bet official said could have “changed our entire assessment picture”.</p>
<p><em>Haaretz</em> also notes that Israel had received similar warnings about a coming Hamas attack from Egyptian intelligence, which had been reported earlier.</p>
<p>These are just two items in the <a href="https://booty.substack.com/p/october-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mountains</a> upon <a href="https://booty.substack.com/p/before-107-idfs-gaza-border-spotters" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mountains</a> upon <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTfhoeKparU" target="_blank" rel="noopener">mountains</a> of <a href="https://archive.is/VpvyV" target="_blank" rel="noopener">evidence</a> indicating that powerful people in Israel knowingly allowed Hamas to inflict as much damage as possible on October 7, 2023, in order to advance the murderous ethnic cleansing objectives we’ve seen rolled out in the years since.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Nothing will make you a conspiracy theorist faster than learning basic facts about what happened on October 7 2023. <a href="https://t.co/J2q26vlDiy">https://t.co/J2q26vlDiy</a> <a href="https://t.co/Optx60745g">pic.twitter.com/Optx60745g</a></p>
<p>— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) <a href="https://x.com/caitoz/status/2097239765032816897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Nothing will turn you into a conspiracy theorist faster than learning basic facts about what happened on October 7. But even without knowing those facts it already strains credulity to believe Israel had no advance knowledge of a complex attack which would require extensive <a href="https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YHljeToXyME" target="_blank" rel="noopener">open-air training</a> in one of the most <a href="https://politicstoday.org/israels-mass-surveillance-of-palestinians-is-more-than-an-obsession/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">heavily surveilled</a> strips of land on our planet.</p>
<p>Especially when you look at all the pre-existing military agendas Israel was able to push forward in the aftermath.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Ha&#8217;aretz reports that Hamas, through Qatar, conveyed immediately on Oct. 7 that they were willing to return all the civilian hostages for nothing &#8212; their only ask was for a mediator to arrange the exchange and establish a connection to then negotiate the further release of the… <a href="https://t.co/DYRze8r9bf">pic.twitter.com/DYRze8r9bf</a></p>
<p>— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) <a href="https://x.com/ryangrim/status/2097495935072780500?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 9, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p>Later in that same article, <em>Haaretz</em> quotes a Palestinian politician named Samir Mashharawi describing what Hamas leadership told him during his mediation efforts between Israel and Hamas after October 7:</p>
<blockquote><p>“He told me that in the first stage, they had no problem releasing all civilians without anything in return,” Mashharawi recounts.</p>
<p>“I swear, those were his exact words: all civilians, without anything in return. They had only one condition: They wanted us to bring in an agreed-upon mediator as quickly as possible, so that negotiations could immediately begin over everything else.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Mashharawi said Israel rejected the offer. A senior Israeli defence official corroborated this, telling <em>Haaretz</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>“The release of the hostages did not even enter the list of war objectives formulated by the government on the night of October 7.</p>
<p>&#8220;Could the proposal have been properly discussed and a decision reached? In substantive terms, the answer is yes.</p>
<p>&#8220;But the prevailing mood was like after Pearl Harbor: We had just suffered a brutal blow, we were in the midst of war, who had the bandwidth to talk about stopping the fighting and starting negotiations now, even if it was to save the lives of dozens of people, whose final number was still unknown?”</p></blockquote>
<p>So all that hasbara about the hostages and the Bibas kids and how Hamas needed to be destroyed because they were refusing to release innocent civilian captives was complete bunk from the very beginning.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LtYNAFBoNFk?si=OiLwtdyYSxT-bAiL" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>Hamas offered to release them with no conditions but the opening of communication lines. Israel refused, because what they wanted was to steal more Palestinian land. It was never about the hostages, and anyone who said it was is a liar.</p>
<figure></figure>
<p>Lastly, a separate <a href="https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/magazine/2026-09-09/ty-article-magazine/.premium/000001a0-7712-d7d5-a9fc-7fffb1a00000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">report in Hebrew from <em>Haaretz</em></a> quotes an Israeli air force reserve major describing how IDF policies and culture ensured the deaths of large numbers of civilians. Here are a few quotes, <a href="https://x.com/academic_la/status/2097634374355419618" target="_blank" rel="noopener">translated by</a> Israeli-American political analyst Shaiel Ben-Ephraim:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;1) He was involved in the March 23, 2025 paramedic killings in Tel al-Sultan, Rafah, and said, &#8216;You could clearly tell these were rescue vehicles even as fire was opened on them from the ground.&#8217;<br />
&#8220;For no apparent reason, the force on the ground charged the convoy. They shot the first vehicle, the medical personnel got out, hid behind the ambulances and begged for their lives, and the soldiers shot them one after another.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;2) On how the yellow line was used as an excuse to kill innocent people: “The Palestinians didn’t know it existed, and the Air Force wasn’t always updated either.</p>
<p>&#8220;From the perspective of a farmer walking onto his own land — he has no idea he’s stepping into an area the IDF suddenly decided is a fire zone. &#8220;And then all kinds of retroactive justifications started coming up. ‘He came for an arms deal.’ ‘He touched the ground, maybe he’s planting an explosive.’</p>
<p>&#8220;To me it looked like they were trying to incriminate people with no intelligence and no proof.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;3) On how all morals were lost in Gaza: &#8216;The feeling was that something tore, everyone had already become cynical about death, you can’t understand it from the outside. It’s not just fatigue, it’s an erosion of morality, of responsibility, of the sense that someone is still managing the event.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;Very quickly this whole business of ‘collateral damage’ disappeared from the considerations. They fire on anyone they see. The atmosphere started to be like the stands at a soccer match. The way you shout at a player, ‘Yalla, score,’ that’s how they shout at a soldier, &#8216;Kill him, strike him.'&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Like the other revelations, this report further discredits the lies the public was sold about Israel’s reasons for its atrocities in Gaza.</p>
<p>All those <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/aug/21/revealed-israeli-militarys-own-data-indicates-civilian-death-rate-of-83-in-gaza-war" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lies</a> about how Israel is taking extraordinary measures to protect civilian life in Gaza and only kills civilians because Hamas “hides behind human shields” has been thoroughly discredited by <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/israel-is-killing-civilians-in-gaza" target="_blank" rel="noopener">copious amounts of evidence</a> that Israel was going out of its way to kill noncombatants throughout the course of the onslaught.</p>
<p>The world was lied to about the Gaza holocaust, just like it was lied to about every other act of mass military slaughter that the US involves itself in. Please carry these lessons into the future.</p>
<p><a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/"><em>Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em> is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include <a href="https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-un-torture-report-on-assange-is-an-indictment-of-our-entire-society-bc7b0a7130a6">The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society</a>. She publishes a website and <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/">Caitlin’s Newsletter</a>. This article is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pacific Islands Forum leaders in Koror &#8211; heavy on reaffirming but light on tasking</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/11/pacific-islands-forum-leaders-in-koror-heavy-on-reaffirming-but-light-on-tasking/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bougainville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiribati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nauru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palau-Belau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papua New Guinea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tahiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timor-Leste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanuatu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bougainville independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese missile tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate delegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum's envoys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanesian Spearhead Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific civil society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Islands Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF communiqué]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's representation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Tess Newton Cain and Stefan Armbruster With a Chinese ballistic missile test in July as prelude, the familiar China-Taiwan tensions and preparations for the Pacific pre-COP in October and COP31 the following month, the annual Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting (PIFLM) returned to Palau last week for the first time in 12 years, ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="header reader-header reader-show-element">
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Tess Newton Cain and Stefan Armbruster</em></p>
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="moz-reader-content reader-show-element">
<div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
<div>
<p>With a Chinese ballistic missile test in July as prelude, the familiar China-Taiwan tensions and preparations for the <a href="https://www.foreignaffairs.gov.fj/fiji-australia-and-tuvalu-strengthen-cooperation-ahead-of-pre-cop-and-cop31/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific pre-COP</a> in October and COP31 the following month, the annual Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting (PIFLM) returned to Palau last week for the first time in 12 years, and north of the equator for the first time since Pohnpei in 2016.</p>
<p>Preparations for the 55th PIFLM were still underway as delegates arrived in Koror. <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/forum-faces-packed-agenda-and-partner-pressure-in-palau/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">An expected 2000 people</a> soon choked the town as motorcades shuttled VIPs between hotels and venues.</p>
<p><a href="https://tncpacific.substack.com/p/pacific-leaders-where-the-bloody" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Attendance speculation</a> dominated the early part of the week. The leaders of Fiji, Kiribati, New Caledonia, Samoa and Vanuatu were absent, and barely anyone mentioned that New Zealand’s Christopher Luxon, chair from 2027, <a href="https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2026/09/03/fuel-climate-and-security-on-agenda-as-luxon-joins-pacific-leaders-retreat/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">only planned to attend the retreat</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/10/pacific-islands-forum-is-australia-out-of-touch-with-the-pacific-and-climate/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Pacific Islands Forum: Is Australia out of touch with the Pacific and climate?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Pacific+Islands+Forum">Other Pacific Islands Forum reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Kiribati, close to Beijing, sent <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/pacific/1200583/missing-leaders-won-t-derail-pacific-islands-forum-outcomes-secretariat-says" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Director of Foreign Service and former ambassador to China, David Teaabo</a>, but he was <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-04/pacific-leaders-criticise-china-missile-test/107114182" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">not in the room for the retreat</a>, where the missile response was thrashed out, and Kiribati was <a href="https://www.1news.co.nz/2026/09/05/disappointing-kiribati-snubbed-at-pacific-islands-forum-closing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">initially omitted from acknowledgements at the closing session</a>, which Teaabo called “protocol-wise … not good”.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-30/solomon-islands-prime-minister-no-confidence-motion/107094924" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matthew Wale</a>, Prime Minister of Solomon Islands and outgoing PIF chair, added to the drama: met on arrival on the evening of Saturday, August 29, by journalists asking about a no-confidence motion lodged in Honiara that day, he flew home in the early hours of Sunday. (The motion was <a href="https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/9345391/no-confidence-vote-in-solomon-islands-pm-wale-pulled/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">withdrawn on September 7</a>.)</p>
<p>Invited back were the Forum’s 21 dialogue partners, excluded from last year’s meeting in Honiara over China-Taiwan tensions, along with the sole “development partner”, Taiwan. At the opening ceremony, China’s envoy Qian Bo and Taiwan’s foreign minister Lin Chia-lung were <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-01/china-warns-of-consequences-over-taiwan-attendance/107100296" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">seated in the same room</a>.</p>
<p>The week culminated in <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2026-09/55PIFLM%20Communique.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the communiqué</a>, 76 paragraphs under headings tracking the thematic areas of the <a href="https://forumsec.org/2050strategy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent</a>. Leaders endorsed “revised Communiqué drafting procedures”, but the document is increasingly flabby and lacks forward momentum: “reaffirmed” appears 38 times and “endorsed” 20; “agreed” 14 times, twice only in principle; “tasked” once.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Partnership streams&#8217;</strong><br />
Leaders agreed on the placement of partners in the two “partnership streams” created by last year’s <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/54th%20Pacific%20Islands%20Forum%20Leaders%20Communique_final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leaders Policy on Partnerships</a>, the communiqué’s only words on the subject. As the Secretariat <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/forum-faces-packed-agenda-and-partner-pressure-in-palau/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">explains it</a>, Tier 1 “strategic partners” keep leader-level access, while Tier 2 “sectoral partners” engage only at ministerial level on specific issues, with placements reviewed after a year.</p>
<p>Secretary General <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_Waqa" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Baron Waqa</a> will now <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/forum-outcomes-highlight-complex-and-challenging-strategic-environment/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">write to the countries concerned</a>. The communiqué does not name them, but the <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-04/pacific-leaders-criticise-china-missile-test/107114182" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ABC</a> and <a href="https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/pacific-islands-forum-statement-on-chinese-ballistic-missile-test/pq71exzgy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SBS</a> report that the 13 strategic partners are China, the United States, Japan, France, India, Indonesia, Germany, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada, Singapore, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates.</p>
<p>That leaves in the second stream Türkiye, the host of COP31, and Thailand, whose prime minister is coming to the pre-COP, and six others. Their reactions will be watched closely.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/09/04/pacific-leaders-issue-belau-call-to-keep-1-5c-alive/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belau Declaration for Urgent and Inclusive Climate Action to Keep 1.5°C Within Reach</a> was issued the day after a sobering <a href="https://www.unep.org/resources/limiting-overshoot-navigating-exceedance" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">UNEP report</a> confirmed that the target will be overshot, as the declaration itself concedes.</p>
<p>It restates the Pacific position more strongly for the pre-COP and COP31 but sets out no pathway for returning the issue to centre stage globally; that job is deferred to the leaders’ meeting in Tuvalu that sits alongside the pre-COP proper, which Fiji co-hosts.</p>
<p>After Australia failed to secure a Pacific COP31, the consolation prize of a pre-meeting had been sold as a chance for world leaders to see Pacific climate impacts firsthand.</p>
<p>Fiji’s foreign minister, Sakiasi Ditoka, <a href="https://www.thenational.com.pg/fiji-reveals-pre-cop-attendees-at-pacific-summit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">revealed</a> that the leaders of Antigua and Barbuda, Cabo Verde, Thailand, Maldives and Timor-Leste would come, along with a handful of ministers. Leaders do not usually attend pre-COPs, but the media presented the low turnout as a <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/just-five-nations-outside-the-pacific-to-attend-australian-climate-event-20260902-p60tov.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">major embarrassment</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Australian sticking point</strong><br />
For some, Australia’s own contribution remains the sticking point. Vanuatu’s Climate Change Minister, Ralph Regenvanu, was typically forthright, telling the media that Australia was <a href="https://islandsbusiness.com/news-break/australia-not-doing-enough-vanuatu/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">“not doing enough”</a> and must end fossil fuel expansion.</p>
<p>He spoke on the day Australia’s new environmental regulator <a href="https://australianminingreview.com.au/news/nepa-greenlights-bmas-saraji-extension-to-2055/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">approved an extension of the BHP Mitsubishi Alliance’s Saraji coal mine</a> to 2055, its first coal approval since it began operating on July 1, and by the <a href="https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/resources/albanese-governments-fossil-fuel-approvals/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Climate Council’s count</a> the 37th fossil fuel project approved since Labor took office in 2022.</p>
<p>The Chinese missile, <a href="https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/australia/2026/australia-260903-australia-pm01.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fired from a submarine</a>, <a href="https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/pacific-islands-forum-statement-on-chinese-ballistic-missile-test/pq71exzgy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">crossed the exclusive economic zones</a> of several Forum members, including the Federated States of Micronesia, <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-07-30/nauru-officially-changes-name-to-naoero/106978670" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Naoero (formerly Nauru)</a> and Kiribati, before coming down near the Kiribati-Tuvalu boundary.</p>
<p>Leaders “registered concern” and called for at least 24 hours’ notice of future tests from all states, presumably including the United States, though neither China nor the US is named.</p>
<p>But with Kiribati absent from the retreat and Naoero’s President, David Adeang, dissociating his country from the paragraph in a footnote, the consensus was undermined. Naoero, which switched recognition to Beijing in 2024, was the sole formal dissenter among the 18 members.</p>
<p>There was some movement on West Papua. Prodded by the <a href="https://msgsec.info/wp-content/uploads/DG_Statements/MSGCaucusPalau2026/MSG-Caucus-Decisions-Summary-31-August-2026-Koror.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG)</a>, the PIF agreed to facilitate a dialogue with Indonesia and a mission of “interested Leaders”, destination unstated, in consultation with the MSG Secretariat, <a href="https://fijisun.com.fj/news/pacific/rabuka-marape-to-lead-pacific-mission-on-west-papua-human-rights" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reporting back in 2027</a>.</p>
<p>The Forum’s envoys, <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/52nd%20Pacific%20Islands%20Forum%20Communique%2020231109.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">appointed in 2023</a>, Fiji’s Sitiveni Rabuka and PNG’s James Marape, are to press Indonesia on the long-sought visit by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, <a href="https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/indonesia" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">the invitation for which was originally extended by Indonesia in 2018</a> but still not granted.</p>
<p><strong>Indonesia may face &#8216;review&#8217;</strong><br />
The MSG wants the visit by 31 December 2026, when Indonesia’s presidency of the UN Human Rights Council ends, or it will <a href="https://pacific.scoop.co.nz/2026/09/melanesian-countries-to-review-indonesias-status-at-msg-if-no-action-on-west-papua-visit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">review Indonesia’s associate member status</a> at its 2027 summit.</p>
<p>Leaders also <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/09/04/pacific-leaders-step-up-climate-and-disaster-push-ahead-of-cop31-approve-renewable-energy-commissioner-as-climate-push-intensifies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">approved terms of reference</a> for a Renewable Energy Commissioner, <a href="https://forumsec.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/52nd%20Pacific%20Islands%20Forum%20Communique%2020231109.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">first agreed in 2023</a>, to sit within the <a href="https://www.spc.int/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific Community (SPC)</a> with dual reporting to SPC and the Forum Secretariat, funded by an initial <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/pacific-collaboration-climate-and-renewable-energy-powers-ahead" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">A$1.89 million from Australia</a>. Once appointed, the commissioner is to advocate for investment in renewables and coordinate the push towards 100 percent renewables, cutting dependence on imported diesel.</p>
<p>AI and digital sovereignty formally joined the regional agenda with the endorsement of the <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/08/14/pacific-ministers-back-ai-rules-and-safer-digital-spaces-as-connectivity-expands/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific Digital and Artificial Intelligence Technology Principles</a>, “the Pacific’s first collective regional position on artificial intelligence”, which will inform a governance framework in 2027.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://pina.com.fj/2026/09/04/pacific-leaders-put-women-at-centre-of-climate-action/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pacific Pact on Gender and Climate Action</a> is also new, committing governments to strengthen women’s representation in climate delegations, ministerial portfolios and governance bodies. Asked at the final press conference how that would happen with only one female leader among the Forum’s 18 members (Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine), after some confused looks, PIF chair <a href="https://forumsec.org/forum-leaders/he-surangel-whipps-jr" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Surangel Whipps</a> said Palau was traditionally a matrilineal society where the women “<a href="https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2026/09/04/women-hold-power-in-palau-but-remain-outnumbered-at-the-pacific-leaders-table/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">decide who’s chief</a>“, and predicted that “a new woman president is not far away”. (When Whipps invoked the influence of leaders’ wives, Luxon said, “That’s not the same, mate”.)</p>
<p>The closing press conference also exposed issues yet to reach the leaders’ agenda, none of them in the communiqué: a growing HIV crisis, which <a href="https://fijisun.com.fj/news/pacific/groups-question-pacific-leaders-silence-on-hiv" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">civil society groups complained</a> was left off the health agenda; the future of Bougainville as it moves towards independence from Papua New Guinea; and the <a href="https://www.islapublic.org/news/2026-09-01/guams-governor-calls-for-full-membership-in-pacific-islands-forum" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ambitions of Guam and American Samoa</a>, associate members since 2024, for full membership despite their status as US territories.</p>
<p>The next PIFLM will be held in New Zealand in 2027, and the one after that in Naoero, the missile-testing dissenter, followed by Marshall Islands in 2029, Vanuatu in 2030 and French Polynesia in 2031.</p>
<p>Whether the intervening 12 months produce action on the commitments made in Koror, or another communiqué heavy on reaffirming and light on tasking, remains to be seen.</p>
<p><a href="https://devpolicy.org/author/tess-newton-cain/"><em>Dr Tess Newton Cain</em></a><em> is an Associate of the Development Policy Centre and an adjunct Associate Professor at the Griffith Asia Institute. <a href="https://devpolicy.org/author/stefan-armbruster/">Stefan Armbruster</a> is an award-winning journalist with 30+ years experience covering Australia and the Pacific. Formerly head of news (Pacific) at RFA/BenarNews and SBS correspondent; previously with BBC, ABC, Dow Jones and CNBC. This article is republished from ANU&#8217;s <a href="https://devpolicy.org/">Development Policy Blog</a> under Creative Commons.</em></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A landmark UN report says the world will overshoot the 1.5°C climate target. What happens now?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/09/a-landmark-un-report-says-the-world-will-overshoot-the-1-5c-climate-target-what-happens-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate-boosted disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Nino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food shortages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaciers melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific climate action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rising sea level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surangel Whipps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildfires]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Jacqueline Peel and Wesley Morgan For more than a decade, the world has been trying to limit global warming to 1.5°C. That’s no longer possible, according to a new United Nations report. We will likely pass 1.5°C in 2030. That’s not good news for anyone, least of all Australia and New Zealand’s Pacific ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By <span class="fn author-name">Jacqueline Peel and</span> Wesley Morgan</em></p>
<p>For more than a decade, the world has been trying to limit global warming to 1.5°C.</p>
<p>That’s no longer possible, according to a new United Nations <a href="https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/49857">report</a>. We will likely pass 1.5°C in 2030. That’s not good news for anyone, least of all Australia and New Zealand’s Pacific Island neighbours who face <a href="https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-analysis-shows-irreversible-sea-level-rise-for-pacific-islands/">rapidly rising seas</a>.</p>
<p>In response to the report, Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jr said:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is hard to overstate the depth of emotion for those of us living on the frontline after having fought so hard to put the 1.5 degree limit at the heart of the Paris Agreement […] calls for greater ambition are no longer enough — we need to see an urgent and unprecedented increase in political will and investment in a climate safe future</p></blockquote>
<p>READ MORE:</p>
<p>The small silver lining is that it’s still possible for this to be a temporary overshoot of the target. If nations redouble their efforts to phase out fossil fuels and reduce other sources of emissions, they could <a href="https://zerocarbon-analytics.org/science/beyond-1-5c-what-the-science-says-about-overshoot-and-what-comes-next/">limit</a> peak warming to 1.8°C and then use carbon removal methods to bring temperatures back to 1.5°C or below this century.</p>
<p>In 2026, the world is already <a href="https://www.politico.eu/article/global-warming-1-4-celsius-climate-change-copernicus/">about 1.4°C</a> warmer than pre-industrial levels, and the damage and death toll from climate-boosted disasters is <a href="https://www.undrr.org/gar/gar2025">ramping up</a>.</p>
<p>The United Kingdom is warning of <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/aug/25/uk-to-warn-citizens-to-stock-up-on-food-amid-threat-from-climate-crisis-and-hostile-states">possible food shortages</a> amid a historic drought. Wildfires hit new areas in <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj638jx0l53o">France and Spain</a>, while glaciers are <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00777-z">melting rapidly</a> and the oceans are at their <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-25/ocean-temperatures-hit-record-spurred-by-el-ni%C3%B1o/107073982">hottest level</a> on record. The <a href="https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/el-nino-explainer/index.html">enormous El Niño event</a> emerging in the Pacific is likely to bring <a href="https://theconversation.com/how-will-this-years-record-breaking-el-nino-affect-nz-and-the-world-5-things-to-know-290159">major disruption</a>.</p>
<p>Every fraction of a degree makes things worse.</p>
<p>There are <a href="https://theconversation.com/overshooting-1-5-c-even-temporary-warming-above-globally-agreed-temperature-limit-could-have-permanent-consequences-255523">no good outcomes</a> if we remain above 1.5°C. Urgent cuts to emissions and efforts to protect the most vulnerable are our best remaining options. Failure to do so risks irreversible harm.</p>
<figure style="width: 754px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/757404/original/file-20260902-50-5x68cn.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.1&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="Sandbars and low river level in the Danube River, Romania" width="754" height="503" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Major European rivers are at record low levels this year, threatening trade, power plants and farming . . . Pictured: the Danube River in southeastern Romania on August 5. Image: Xinhua News Agency/Getty</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Why does 1.5°C matter so much?<br />
</strong>The 2015 <a href="https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement">Paris Agreement</a> established a shared goal for the world: keep the rise in global average temperatures above pre-industrial levels “well below” 2°C and “pursue efforts” to hold warming to 1.5°C.</p>
<p>This goal was set based on <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/">expert scientific assessments</a> that warming of more than 2°C would be dangerous and that limiting warming to 1.5°C was necessary to minimise climate risks.</p>
<p>Pacific nations fought hard to include 1.5°C in the agreement, arguing it was essential for their communities to “<a href="https://theconversation.com/glasgow-showdown-pacific-islands-demand-global-leaders-bring-action-not-excuses-to-un-summit-169649">stay alive</a>” in the face of rising sea levels and other climate-fuelled threats.</p>
<p>Last year, the world’s top court &#8212; the International Court of Justice &#8212; <a href="https://theconversation.com/worlds-highest-court-issues-groundbreaking-ruling-for-climate-action-heres-what-it-means-for-australia-261842">ruled</a> that 1.5°C is the <a href="https://www.icj-cij.org/case/187">primary temperature limit</a> nations have committed to work towards.</p>
<p>This ruling means that if governments fail to act as ambitiously as they can, they could be sued in international courts.</p>
<p>In May this year, a majority of nations voted in the UN General Assembly <a href="https://press.un.org/en/2026/ga12760.doc.htm">to endorse</a> the court’s ruling and urge action to keep to 1.5°C.</p>
<p><strong>It’s not time to give up<br />
</strong>Warming of 1.5°C will be bad. But 1.6°C will be worse, and 1.7°C worse again. Every increase will bring more extreme weather, more loss of nature, more loss of land to the sea and more harm to humans.</p>
<p>If we stay over 1.5°C, we risk triggering climate tipping points &#8212; sudden shifts which cannot be undone on human timescales. These include the Greenland and West Antarctic <a href="https://nsidc.org/learn/parts-cryosphere/ice-sheets/why-ice-sheets-matter">ice sheets</a> melting, the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/28/collapse-critical-atlantic-current-amoc-no-longer-low-likelihood-study">collapse</a> of crucial heat-distributing currents in the Atlantic Ocean or the Amazon rainforest becoming a <a href="https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/en-pm-amazon-rainforest-turned-into-carbon-source">source of emissions</a>.</p>
<p>Overshooting 1.5°C doesn’t mean it’s time to throw out the Paris Agreement. It is not working fast enough, but it is working.</p>
<p>Solar power and electric vehicles have boomed and <a href="https://www.iea.org/news/global-electricity-demand-growth-set-to-accelerate-as-power-systems-adjust-to-recent-shocks">electrification has accelerated</a>. Nations have cut emissions enough to avoid the <a href="https://theconversation.com/scientists-have-scrapped-the-worst-case-climate-scenario-because-action-is-making-a-difference-283675">worst climate futures</a> of a 3°C rise or even higher.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="https://climateactiontracker.org/global/historical-progress/">Climate Action Tracker</a>, the Paris Agreement has averted the equivalent of 1°C of warming. Rather than hitting 3.6°C by 2100, the world is on track for 2.6°C.</p>
<p>While this is progress, it is not enough. Global emissions are <a href="https://climatetrace.org/news/climate-trace-data-show-marginal-increase-in-global-emissions-in-the-first-half-of-2026">plateauing</a>, but have still not begun to fall in earnest.</p>
<p>As damage from climate change mounts, leaders must do the work and begin rapidly cutting emissions to keep the goal of net-zero by 2050 alive.</p>
<p>To get temperatures back under 1.5°C, we will also need to pull gigatonnes of carbon dioxide back out of the atmosphere using tree planting and nature restoration. We may also need technological approaches such as rock weathering or ocean alkalinity enhancement, though these are not proven at scale and can come with other risks.</p>
<figure style="width: 754px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/757408/original/file-20260902-50-t19jov.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.1&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="Wind turbine and coal plant seen at a distance" width="754" height="503" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">There has been progress on climate change since 2015 – but not enough. Image: acilo/Getty</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>We are all in this together<br />
</strong>It may seem as if climate action faces impossible headwinds, as populism surges and the current United States administration <a href="https://theconversation.com/the-us-has-struck-a-deal-to-control-venezuelas-oil-reserves-it-probably-wont-help-bring-down-fuel-prices-290847">doubles down</a> on fossil fuels.</p>
<p>It is worth looking beyond these headlines. It took almost 70 years for the world to install a terawatt of solar power, but then just two years for the second and another two for the <a href="https://e360.yale.edu/digest/three-terawatts-solar">third terawatt</a>. In ten years, that figure will likely have tripled. Developing nations are <a href="https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/the-ev-leapfrog-how-emerging-markets-are-driving-a-global-ev-boom/">moving rapidly</a> to take up non-polluting electric transport.</p>
<p>Climate change can no longer be ignored. As damage mounts, nations will have to cooperate to cut emissions as rapidly as possible and figure out how to safely and equitably pull carbon back out of the atmosphere.</p>
<p>Action depends on strong political will, inclusive governance, and finance to help developing countries cut emissions and adapt.</p>
<p>In November, Australia will <a href="https://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/international-climate-action/unfccc-cop/cop31">lead negotiations</a> at the next international climate summit, COP31, in Turkey. Leaders and diplomats will work to <a href="https://www.dcceew.gov.au/about/news/belem-mission-1-5-help-shape-global-climate-action">keep 1.5°C in reach</a> &#8212; even after overshoot. Australia can point to its own rapid <a href="https://cleanenergycouncil.org.au/news-resources/clean-energy-australia-report-2026">clean energy transition</a> and urge others to set clear pathways to go electric &#8212; and <a href="https://reneweconomy.com.au/australia-endorses-ambitious-new-global-electrification-target-to-hasten-exit-from-fossil-fuels/">wean themselves</a> off the production and use of fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Climate change has been described as a <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0">super wicked problem</a> &#8212; big, complex and impossible to solve simply. The solution is to see the urgency of the issue and act cooperatively to tackle it.</p>
<p>If we make it a problem for the next generation, there may be no way back to a safe climate.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/jacqueline-peel-8356">Dr Jacqueline Peel</a> is professor of law, The University of Melbourne; <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/wesley-morgan-1280881">Dr Wesley Morgan</a> is research associate, Institute for Climate Risk and Response, University of New South Wales. Republished from The Conversation under Creative Commons.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Māori and Pacific soldiers&#8217; final resting place in Gaza &#8211; don&#8217;t forget their story</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/07/maori-and-pacific-soldiers-final-resting-place-in-gaza-dont-forget-their-story/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 11:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth War Graves Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First World War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza war cemetery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graves desecration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maher Nazzal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Māori Pioneer Battalion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine Forum of New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rarotongan soldiers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Maher Nazzal of the Palestine Forum of New Zealand There is a deeply painful connection between Aotearoa New Zealand and the Gaza War Cemetery that deserves to be remembered. Long before the current destruction of Gaza, New Zealand soldiers fought and died in the Palestine campaign of the First World War. Some never ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Maher Nazzal of the Palestine Forum of New Zealand<br />
</em></p>
<p>There is a deeply painful connection between Aotearoa New Zealand and the Gaza War Cemetery that deserves to be remembered.</p>
<p>Long before the current destruction of Gaza, New Zealand soldiers fought and died in the Palestine campaign of the First World War. Some never made it home. Their final resting place is Gaza.</p>
<p>Among those buried at the Gaza War Cemetery are Private Kamati and Private Tutavake, two soldiers associated with the New Zealand Māori Pioneer Battalion&#8217;s Rarotongan contingent. New Zealand historical reporting has described them as members of the Māori Battalion.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+war+graves+desecration"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Gaza war graves desecration reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>They are not simply names on a distant memorial.</p>
<p>They were young men from the Pacific who travelled thousands of kilometres from their homes to serve in a war that brought them to Palestine. They became part of the history of Aotearoa, the Pacific and the Middle East &#8212; and Gaza became their final resting place.</p>
<p>Today, that cemetery itself has been caught up in another war.</p>
<p><strong>A cemetery caught in the destruction of Gaza<br />
</strong>The Gaza War Cemetery contains more than 3000 Commonwealth graves from the First World War, together with graves from the Second World War and other conflicts. The New Zealand War Graves Project records 32 New Zealand casualties at the cemetery, including Kamati and Tutavake.</p>
<p>In February 2026, reports emerged that sections of the cemetery had been bulldozed and damaged.</p>
<p>The <i>New Zealand Herald</i> reported that the destroyed section contained 20 New Zealand and two Rarotongan soldiers. Satellite imagery showed parts of the cemetery&#8217;s previously green grounds turned into churned earth.</p>
<p>The damage was serious enough for the New Zealand government to publicly express its concern.</p>
<figure id="attachment_123618" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-123618" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-123618" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide.png" alt="New Zealand silent over the cemetery desecration" width="680" height="542" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide-300x239.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Gaza-cemetery-TG-680wide-527x420.png 527w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-123618" class="wp-caption-text">New Zealand silent over the desecration . . . graves of unknown soldiers at the Gaza war cemetery in 2009 &#8211; 14 years before Israel&#8217;s war on Gaza and &#8220;systemic destruction&#8221; of the war cemetery. Image: The Guardian screenshot/Riyaah/wiki commons</figcaption></figure>
<p>The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand was “deeply concerned” about damage to the Gaza War Cemetery and the nearby Deir el-Balah War Cemetery, describing them as the final resting places of New Zealanders who died in the two world wars.</p>
<p>New Zealand&#8217;s ambassador to Israel raised the matter directly with the Israeli government, conveying New Zealand&#8217;s expectation that the graves of New Zealand, Pacific and Commonwealth service personnel be treated with the utmost respect.</p>
<p>The Commonwealth War Graves Commission has committed to restoring the cemeteries when it is safe and practical to do so.</p>
<figure id="attachment_133199" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133199" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-133199" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Gaza-War-Cemetery-ABC-680wide.png" alt="A series of images produced by Canadian geospatial firm SkyWatch shows the Gaza War Cemetery and its surrounds have been heavily damaged" width="680" height="382" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Gaza-War-Cemetery-ABC-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Gaza-War-Cemetery-ABC-680wide-300x169.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133199" class="wp-caption-text">A series of images produced by Canadian geospatial firm SkyWatch shows the Gaza War Cemetery and its surrounds have been heavily damaged by military bulldozers . . . The Commonwealth War Graves site in Deir al Balah, Gaza, in August 2023 (left) and the same site in July 2024. Image: ABC</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Their story is bigger than a cemetery<br />
</strong>There is something profoundly symbolic about this.</p>
<p>These Pacific soldiers left their islands and travelled to a part of the world they had never known. They fought and died in Palestine more than a century ago.</p>
<p>Their graves subsequently became part of Gaza&#8217;s landscape.</p>
<p>For generations, the cemetery was cared for by Palestinian caretakers. New Zealanders visiting Gaza on Anzac Day came to remember their countrymen. A 2014 <i>New Zealand Herald</i> account described the cemetery as a place where New Zealanders came to honour the fallen.</p>
<p>And then Gaza became a battlefield again.</p>
<p>The people living around the cemetery today are experiencing a war of their own &#8212; while the men buried beneath the ground have, once again, been caught in the violence of a conflict in Palestine.</p>
<p>That is the tragedy of Gaza&#8217;s war graves.</p>
<p><strong>Aotearoa should remember them<br />
</strong>For New Zealanders, this should not be an abstract international story.</p>
<p>The men buried there were part of our history.</p>
<p>They represented New Zealand and the Pacific at a time when Māori and Pacific soldiers made enormous sacrifices during the First World War.</p>
<p>The story of Kamati and Tutavake also reminds us that the history of New Zealand&#8217;s military service is not exclusively a European story. It includes Māori, Cook Islanders and other Pacific peoples whose contribution and sacrifice helped shape the history of Aotearoa.</p>
<p>Their graves in Gaza are physical links between Aotearoa, the Pacific and Palestine.</p>
<p>And that makes their treatment today especially painful.</p>
<p>Whatever one&#8217;s position on the present conflict, the principle should be straightforward:</p>
<p><strong>Respect for the war graves</strong><br />
War graves must be respected. The dead should not become casualties of the wars of the living.</p>
<p>More than a century after these soldiers died, their final resting place should be a place of peace.</p>
<p>Kamati and Tutavake deserve to be remembered not only as soldiers who died in Palestine, but as Pacific men whose lives became part of the shared history of Aotearoa, the Pacific and Gaza.</p>
<p>Their names remain.</p>
<p>Their graves remain.</p>
<p>And their story should not be forgotten.</p>
<p><em>Maher Nazzal is chair of the Palestine Forum of New Zealand.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>West Papua: The Pacific’s new test of Indonesia’s sovereignty narrative</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/07/west-papua-the-pacifics-new-test-of-indonesias-sovereignty-narrative/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 23:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Papua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanesian Spearhead Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OHCHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Islands Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN High Commissioner for Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Human Rights Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Papua human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Papua self-determination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Ali Mirin The 55th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ Meeting in Koror, Palau, last week has pushed West Papua back to the centre of Pacific diplomacy. At an Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) caucus held on the margins of the Forum, leaders reaffirmed their longstanding call for the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Ali Mirin</em></p>
<p>The 55th Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ Meeting in Koror, Palau, last week has pushed West Papua back to the centre of Pacific diplomacy.</p>
<p>At an Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) caucus held on the margins of the Forum, leaders reaffirmed their longstanding call for the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to visit the West Papuan provinces.</p>
<p>They urged Jakarta to facilitate the visit before 31 December 2026, the end of Indonesia’s term as president of the UN Human Rights Council.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/04/un-human-rights-commissioner-visit-to-west-papua-on-track-says-indonesia/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> UN human rights commissioner visit to West Papua on track, says Indonesia</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=West+Papua">Other West Papua reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_133160" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133160" style="width: 206px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-133160 size-medium" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall-206x300.png" alt=" Ali Mirin" width="206" height="300" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall-206x300.png 206w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall-288x420.png 288w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Ali-Mirin-2-300tall.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 206px) 100vw, 206px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133160" class="wp-caption-text">Author Ali Mirin . . . &#8220;Indonesia&#8217;s sovereignty may be internationally recognised, but sovereignty should never become a shield against legitimate human rights scrutiny.&#8221; Image: APR</figcaption></figure>
<p>Crucially, the MSG said that if the requested steps were not undertaken, Indonesia’s associate member status would be reviewed at the 2027 MSG Summit.</p>
<p>The question is whether Jakarta is willing to allow independent international observers to see, hear, and assess conditions in West Papua?</p>
<p><strong>Sovereignty cannot be the end of the conversation</strong><br />
For decades, Indonesia has relied heavily on sovereignty and territorial integrity when responding to international criticism of West Papua.</p>
<p>Jakarta maintains that Papua is an integral part of Indonesia and that its political status was settled through the international arrangements culminating in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Free_Choice">1969 Act of Free Choice</a>.</p>
<p>From this perspective, calls for international intervention can be portrayed as challenges to Indonesia’s territorial integrity and interference in its domestic affairs.</p>
<p>But sovereignty and accountability are not mutually exclusive. Recognition of territorial sovereignty does not eliminate a state&#8217;s responsibility for human rights. Nor does it prevent international organisations from seeking access to investigate allegations of abuses.</p>
<p><strong>The unresolved legacy of 1969</strong><br />
Indonesia&#8217;s sovereignty argument also rests heavily on history. Under the 1962 New York Agreement between Indonesia and the Netherlands, administration of West New Guinea was temporarily transferred to the United Nations before being transferred to Indonesia.</p>
<p>The agreement envisaged an act of self-determination before the end of 1969.</p>
<p>Rather than a territory-wide referendum involving universal and direct participation by the adult population, the process involved representative councils. UN records state that 1026 members of the enlarged representative councils were asked to express the population&#8217;s choice, and all chose continued association with Indonesia.</p>
<p>The UN General Assembly subsequently adopted Resolution 2504, taking note of the Secretary-General&#8217;s report and the agreement concerning West New Guinea.</p>
<p>The dispute, therefore, is not whether the 1969 process occurred. It clearly did. The deeper question is whether it represented a genuinely free expression of the political will of West Papuans.</p>
<p>This historical disagreement remains politically powerful because the competing narratives have never been reconciled.</p>
<p>For Jakarta, 1969 closed the question of sovereignty. For many West Papuans, it remains evidence that their political aspirations were never freely tested.</p>
<p>But contemporary Pacific diplomacy should not become trapped entirely in this historical dispute. Even if one accepts Indonesia&#8217;s present sovereignty over Papua, contemporary human rights questions remain legitimate.</p>
<p><strong>Indonesia&#8217;s anti-colonial rhetoric</strong><br />
There is also an uncomfortable contradiction in Indonesia&#8217;s international rhetoric.</p>
<p>Indonesia has historically presented itself as an anti-colonial state and a supporter of the principle that peoples should be free from colonial domination.</p>
<p>At the UN Pacific Regional Seminar on Decolonisation in Bali in 2023, then-Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi stated that “independence is the inalienable right of all nations” and argued that colonialism must be abolished.</p>
<p>Indonesia&#8217;s response is that West Papua is not a colonial territory and that its political status was settled through an internationally recognised process.</p>
<p>That is a legitimate position for Indonesia to defend. But the political question remains: if self-determination is a universal principle, how should it be applied when Indigenous Papuans continue to challenge the political circumstances under which integration occurred?</p>
<p><strong>Jakarta&#8217;s &#8216;right path&#8217; needs a destination</strong><br />
Indonesia has responded by insisting that the proposed UN visit is progressing and is “on the right path.” Yet the phrase raises more questions than it answers.</p>
<p><em>What does “the right path” actually mean?</em></p>
<p><em>When will the visit occur?</em></p>
<p><em>Will UN officials have freedom of movement?</em></p>
<p><em>Will they be able to speak privately with Indigenous communities?</em></p>
<p><em>Will they meet civil-society organisations, church leaders, victims, local officials and political representatives?</em></p>
<p><em>Will they be able to visit areas affected by military operations and displacement?</em></p>
<p><em>And will their findings be published without political interference?</em></p>
<p>These are not unreasonable demands. They are the minimum conditions necessary for an assessment to have credibility.</p>
<p>If Jakarta is confident that conditions in Papua have improved, an independent UN assessment could actually strengthen Indonesia&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>Transparency is not necessarily a threat to sovereignty. In fact, it can reinforce legitimacy.</p>
<p><strong>Why the MSG decision matters</strong><br />
The MSG is uniquely placed in this debate because West Papua is not merely a distant foreign policy issue for Melanesian governments.</p>
<p>West Papuans are Indigenous Melanesians, and the MSG was established to strengthen political, economic, and cultural cooperation among Melanesian peoples.</p>
<p>Indonesia&#8217;s associate membership has therefore always contained a political tension.</p>
<p>Jakarta seeks recognition and legitimacy within an organisation representing Melanesian interests, while some MSG members continue to raise concerns about the rights and welfare of Indigenous Melanesians inside Indonesia.</p>
<p>The organisation has not abandoned dialogue. Fiji has made clear that engagement with Jakarta remains necessary. But dialogue without measurable outcomes risks becoming a diplomatic holding pattern.</p>
<p>The proposed OHCHR visit provides a practical benchmark. The MSG has effectively placed a deadline on the issue. That changes the diplomatic calculation. Jakarta is no longer responding only to general statements of concern; it is responding to a specific request accompanied by a potential institutional consequence.</p>
<p><strong>The Pacific is testing itself</strong><br />
Pacific governments increasingly speak of a regional order grounded in Indigenous rights, human security, climate justice and self-determination. They insist that Pacific priorities should not simply be dictated by larger external powers.</p>
<p>West Papua therefore presents a difficult consistency test. At the same time, Pacific diplomacy must avoid reducing every disagreement with Indonesia to a confrontation over sovereignty. Indonesia is too important to the region for that approach to be strategically sustainable.</p>
<p>The better approach is precisely what the MSG appears to be attempting: engagement combined with accountability.</p>
<p><strong>A new phase in the West Papua debate</strong><br />
The significance of Koror is therefore not that the Pacific has suddenly endorsed West Papuan independence. Nor has the MSG decided to remove Indonesia. What has changed is the political language.</p>
<p>The debate is shifting from the binary question of “Indonesia or independence” towards the more immediate question of “sovereignty and accountability”.</p>
<p>That shift creates political space for Pacific governments to demand transparency without having to settle the final status question first. It also places greater responsibility on Jakarta.</p>
<p>Indonesia has spent decades defending its sovereignty over West Papua. It now has an opportunity to demonstrate that sovereignty is compatible with transparency.</p>
<p>The coming months will determine whether the Koror decision becomes another diplomatic statement or a genuine turning point.</p>
<p>For West Papuans, this is not merely a diplomatic dispute. It concerns whether their experiences can be independently heard and investigated.</p>
<p>For the MSG, it is a test of whether Melanesian solidarity has practical meaning.</p>
<p>For the Pacific Islands Forum, it is a test of whether its principles apply consistently.</p>
<p>For Indonesia, it is a test of whether sovereignty can coexist with scrutiny.</p>
<p>And for the United Nations, it is a test of whether international human rights mechanisms can gain meaningful access to one of the Pacific&#8217;s most enduring political disputes.</p>
<p>Indonesia&#8217;s sovereignty may be internationally recognised, but sovereignty should never become a shield against legitimate human rights scrutiny.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Ali+Mirin">Ali Mirin</a> is a West Papuan academic and writer from the Kimyal tribe of the highlands bordering the Star Mountains region of Papua New Guinea. He holds a Master of Arts in International Relations from Flinders University in Adelaide, South Australia.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student newspaper wins lawsuit against Trump’s crackdown on pro-Palestine speech</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/07/student-newspaper-wins-lawsuit-against-trumps-crackdown-on-pro-palestine-speech/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 23:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkiye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rümeysa Öztürk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tufts University]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Democracy Now! AMY GOODMAN: A federal judge has ruled the Trump administration has violated the constitutional rights of international students in seeking to deport them for their pro-Palestinian activism and criticism of Israel. In her ruling, US District Judge Noël Wise wrote, “In the United States, free speech, including the freedom to criticise the government ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.democracynow.org/"><em>Democracy Now!</em></a></p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: A federal judge has ruled the Trump administration has violated the constitutional rights of international students in seeking to deport them for their pro-Palestinian activism and criticism of Israel. </em></p>
<p><em>In her ruling, US District Judge Noël Wise wrote, “In the United States, free speech, including the freedom to criticise the government and its leaders, is not a sign of our democracy’s fragility. It is evidence of its strength. That strength is diminished when members of our society &#8212; citizens and noncitizens alike &#8212; must self-censor and &#8216;behave&#8217; or suffer the government’s retaliation.”<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>The lawsuit was filed by </em><strong>The Stanford Daily</strong><em>, the student newspaper at Stanford University, which claimed some of its writers on student visas declined to cover pro-Palestinian protests or report on topics related to Israel, fearing deportation. </em></p>
<p><em>Student journalists also requested their published articles on such topics be removed from the paper’s website.</em></p>
<p><em>The case raises broader questions about the climate of fear and political repression facing international students during the Trump administration. One of the most striking examples is Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University. </em></p>
<p><em>Last year, masked plainclothes immigration agents snatched Öztürk off the streets of Somerville, Massachusetts. A year earlier, she had co-written an <a href="https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj">opinion piece</a> for the Tufts student newspaper, </em>The Tufts Daily<em>, critical of the university’s response to campus protests over Gaza and the school’s failure to uphold student Senate resolutions on Palestine. </em></p>
<p><em>Tufts University later stated the op-ed did not violate university policy, that no complaints had been filed about it, and that Rümeysa Öztürk had been in good academic and immigration standing. </em></p>
<p><em>Nonetheless, her student visa was canceled, and she spent more than six weeks in an ICE jail in Louisiana. An immigration court eventually ruled in Rümeysa’s favor, saying the government failed to meet its burden of proof to deport her.</em></p>
<p><em>However, the message from the Trump administration to international students across the nation remained clear: Their ordinarily protected free political expression could now potentially cost them their immigration status and their freedom.</em></p>
<p><em>Well, for more, we’re joined by two guests who successfully challenged the Trump administration in court. Here in New York City, George Porteous is with us, editor-in-chief of </em>The Stanford Daily<em>. And in Moorestown, New Jersey, Will Creeley, legal director of FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which represented </em>The Stanford Daily<em> in court.</em></p>
<p><em>George and Will, we welcome you both to </em>Democracy Now! <em>Let’s begin with you, George Porteous. You are a rising senior &#8212;<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> Senior, yeah.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: &#8212; at Stanford. You’re the editor-in-chief of the paper. Talk about why you brought this suit. What were the student reporters saying to you, the international students?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> Thank you for having me.</p>
<p>And what we were hearing from the noncitizens in our newsroom and from noncitizens across campus &#8212; current students, former students, alumni &#8212; was that they were genuinely frightened because of what they saw in the headlines, what they saw happen to Rümeysa Öztürk.</p>
<p>They were understandably frightened that if they reported the news, even if they weren’t writing an op-ed, even if they were just covering a protest or a vigil, if they put their name on a byline, they were frightened that they were going to lose their visa.</p>
<p>And so, what we said is, we can’t function as a newspaper if we don’t have these voices included in our newspaper. So, we filed suit, and last week the judge gave us a favorable ruling.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a2_U20mLSuc?si=HrnSgfcseJke8JyH" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<em>Stanford Daily student press wins free speech lawsuit.    Video: Democracy Now!</em></p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ:</em> <em>And, George, what was the initial response of the Stanford administration to your lawsuit? Did they &#8212; did they support your efforts?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> You know, the administration has remained relatively silent about this suit. We still haven’t heard any response from them since this decision. And we’re an independent organisation, so this was a suit filed by The Stanford Daily on our own, independently. And that’s really why we were in this case, not really because of the university.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And what has this all taught you in terms of the ability of folks to stand up and defend the First Amendment?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS: </em>Well, I think what it’s shown me is that it really has to begin locally, because we were dealing with a problem inside of our newsroom with our peers, and this was about solidarity, and also just the practical need to continue doing our jobs and to continue reporting the news.</p>
<p>So, it’s shown me that it really does begin with everyday people. It begins with students, too. Students, I think, have enormous power to stand up to what this administration has done in terms of civil liberties and constitutional rights. And we have real power, is what this ruling has shown us.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: And are other students who have previously said they’re not going to cover a protest &#8212; are they willing to now? Has this made a difference, changed the climate in your newsroom?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS: </em>You know, it’s still, I think, too early to see. But I’m hopeful that this ruling, because it’s a very strong legal precedent, will carve out more room for noncitizens to feel that they can participate in democracy on campus.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Will Creeley, you are legal director at FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Talk about why you approached </em>The Stanford Daily<em>, why this is such a significant decision.</em></p>
<p><em>WILL CREELEY:</em> Well, it’s an honour to be here, Amy and Juan.</p>
<p>And I’m so proud listening to George now expound upon the importance of folks like George and his predecessor, Greta, standing up for First Amendment rights. It’s extremely important. When you see Rümeysa Öztürk in prison orange from a detention center in Louisiana for co-authoring an op-ed, you know something has gone terribly wrong.</p>
<p>With this administration, again and again, the chill is the point. These actions that they’re taking, these wanton violations of the First Amendment, are designed to get folks like George and his colleagues at <em>The Stanford Daily</em> to feel scared, to think twice, to ask that their names not appear on news reporting or opinion pieces.</p>
<p>That’s flatly un-American.</p>
<p>So, it was extremely important to us to fight back. And we’re so grateful for the bravery of <em>The Stanford Daily</em> folks and our Jane Doe colleague &#8212; Jane Doe plaintiff, who was a member of Students for Justice in Palestine and was no longer going to protest or flying a Palestinian flag or wearing shirts that expressed her political opinions.</p>
<p>She self-censored because of what the administration was doing. That’s a First Amendment violation every day of the week. It’s flatly un-American. And that’s why we’re very proud of last week’s victory.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Will, some members of the Trump administration responded. Stephen Miller posted on X, “A district court judge says America must admit and keep foreigners who hate America and hate Americans. Court-ordered civilisational suicide. It will not stand.” </em></p>
<p><em>Your response? And also the issue that you —</em></p>
<p><em>WILL CREELEY:</em> Yeah.</p>
<p><em>JUAN GONZÁLEZ: If you could talk a little bit about the due process question you raised?</em></p>
<p><em>WILL CREELEY: </em>Stephen Miller has got it exactly backwards. In the year 1800, Thomas Jefferson, in his inaugural address, made clear that in this country we protect the First Amendment rights of even those who call for the dissolution of this country, responding to the Alien and Sedition Acts.</p>
<p>We have a long history in this country of protecting that speech. That’s what makes this country special. We have to live those values. It’s Stephen Miller who’s un-American here, not folks who are expressing their political opinions.</p>
<p>The United States is supposed to be where folks from around the world, folks like Rümeysa Öztürk, Mohsen Mahdawi, Mahmoud Khalil, can come and learn about what it means to be able to speak out without fear of a midnight knock on the door or being whisked away by masked federal agents.</p>
<p>We’re going to continue fighting for those fundamental American rights, no matter who’s in office.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: Well, we’re going to be talking about people being whisked away by federal agents in a moment when we go to Danbury, Connecticut. I want to thank you both for being with us, and just ask you, as you go into your senior year, George: What are you majoring in?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> I’m a history major.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: So, what have you learned?</em></p>
<p><em>GEORGE PORTEOUS:</em> Well, history repeats itself. And I think what we’ve seen is this administration has a clear agenda. They’re trying to instill fear on campuses. And they’ve done lasting damage. I mean, this lawsuit is a victory, but a lot of damage has already been done.</p>
<p>So, I think what I’ve learned is that we have a responsibility, especially as students. We have an opportunity to continue standing up for our peers, because when the most vulnerable among us is afraid to speak, we should all be deeply concerned.</p>
<p><em>AMY GOODMAN: George Porteous, editor-in-chief of </em>The Stanford Daily<em>. Will Creeley, legal director at FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.</em></p>
<p><em>Republished from Democracy Now! under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shane te Pou: Matua Pita Tipene, I wish you weren’t in Israel right now</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/05/shane-te-pou-matua-pita-tipene-i-wish-you-werent-in-israel-right-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanitarian catastrophe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral consistency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pita Tipene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane Te Pou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Blog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OPEN LETTER IN THE DAILY BLOG: By Shane te Pou Tēnā koe, Te Rangatira Matua Pita Tipene, I’ve met you several times over the years and have always respected you. You have struck me as thoughtful, considered and serious about rangatiratanga with a genuine concern for the people you serve. I have seen you as ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OPEN LETTER IN <a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/"><em>THE DAILY BLOG</em></a>:</strong> <em>By Shane te Pou</em></p>
<p><em>Tēnā koe, Te Rangatira</em></p>
<p>Matua Pita Tipene, I’ve met you several times over the years and have always respected you. You have struck me as thoughtful, considered and serious about rangatiratanga with a genuine concern for the people you serve. I have seen you as an island of calmness surrounded by a sea of madness.</p>
<p>That is why I struggle with the fact that you are in Israel right now.</p>
<p>I know you have said that you want to see for yourself what is happening rather than rely only on the media. I also know that you have spoken about paying homage to our tūpuna of the 28th Māori Battalion who fought and died in that part of the world.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/4/us-rejects-israeli-suggestions-of-removing-palestinians-from-gaza"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> US rejects Israeli suggestions of removing Palestinians from Gaza</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/4/israeli-police-kill-palestinian-in-jerusalem-as-army-blocks-aid-for-qusra">Israeli police kill Palestinian in Jerusalem as army blocks aid for Qusra</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide">Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But I have to be honest, Pita: I do not understand either of those reasons for being there at this particular moment. Whatever the intention, I struggle to see how travelling to Israel now is the right thing to do, given what is happening in Gaza.</p>
<p>This is not an ordinary time to visit Israel. A humanitarian catastrophe is unfolding in real time.</p>
<p>Hamas must be condemned. I condemn the attacks of October 7, the killing of Israeli civilians and the taking of hostages. Nothing justifies those actions. But condemning Hamas does not require us to suspend our moral judgment about Israel’s response.</p>
<p>Nothing that happened on October 7 justifies the killing of Palestinian civilians, the destruction of homes and essential infrastructure, the displacement of communities or the denial of basic necessities.</p>
<p>I’m not really a stats man but here is one that we must collectively mourn upon nearly 22,000 Palestinian children killed from October 7th 2023 to February 2026.</p>
<figure id="attachment_133095" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133095" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-133095 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Join-us-Global-March-for-Peace-Oct-10-300wide.png" alt="A Global March for Palestine - including Aotearoa New Zealand" width="300" height="395" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Join-us-Global-March-for-Peace-Oct-10-300wide.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Join-us-Global-March-for-Peace-Oct-10-300wide-228x300.png 228w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133095" class="wp-caption-text">A Global March for Palestine &#8211; including Aotearoa New Zealand &#8211; is planned for October 10. Image: APR</figcaption></figure>
<p>By God’s mercy alone, the death threat has slowed down but hear this Matua since your arrival in Israel 12 children have died</p>
<p>As Māori, our history should make us particularly sensitive to what happens when a powerful state exercises authority over another people. We know dispossession, the loss of whenua and the experience of having our history contested or told by those with greater political and military power.</p>
<p>That is why I think about Ngāti Hine. Your people have a proud history of standing with those seeking self-determination &#8212; from Ireland and South Africa to Kanaky.</p>
<p>Nelson Mandela understood that principle clearly. He recognised that South Africa’s freedom was incomplete without the freedom of Palestinians. His position was not a rejection of Jewish people or Israel’s security; it was a recognition that opposition to oppression must be applied consistently.</p>
<p>Many Māori see something familiar in the Palestinian experience. That does not mean supporting Hamas, excusing the killing of Israeli civilians or disregarding the safety of Jewish people. We can condemn all of those things while still insisting that Palestinian lives and rights matter equally.</p>
<p>Pita, you have copped a lot of online abuse. I understand people’s outrage, but I’m not going to add to it. I believe you are a reasonable person, and I believe these are issues we should be able to sit down and talk through. I would much rather have that conversation than contribute to the abuse being directed at you.</p>
<p>But I also think you need to be prepared for what happens when you come home. Your absence and your actions have upset a lot of people, including people within your own community, and many will be deeply disappointed.</p>
<p>People will also want to know whether the trip was privately funded and, if so, by whom. The reality is that, as a leader, you face a great level of scrutiny.</p>
<p>Seeing for yourself matters. But so does what we do with what we see.</p>
<p>For me, the principle is simple: nothing justifies the killing of civilians, wherever they live and whoever they are. Palestinian lives are not worth less than Israeli lives, and the security of one people cannot be built on the suffering of another.</p>
<p>You have always seemed to me to be a thoughtful man, Pita. That is why I hope you will reflect deeply on what you have seen, what you have heard and what our whakapapa asks of us.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://thedailyblog.co.nz/author/shane-te-pou/">Shane te Pou</a> is a political commentator and Māori broadcaster and he writes a political analysis column for The Daily Blog. This article is republished from TDB with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nepali Times: Not if, but when next?</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/04/nepali-times-not-if-but-when-next/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avalanche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate loss and damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood catastrophe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacial lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glacier melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaciers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Langtang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lhende Khola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepali Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN climate summits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Nepali Times No one could have predicted this disaster would happen when it did, but we all knew it would happen one day. As this paper went to press last Thursday afternoon, the unimaginable scale of the Central Nepal flood catastrophe was becoming apparent. With every notice about a bank branch that lost all ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EDITORIAL:</strong> <a href="https://nepalitimes.com/"><em>Nepali Times</em></a></p>
<p>No one could have predicted this disaster would happen when it did, but we all knew it would happen one day.</p>
<p>As this paper went to press last Thursday afternoon, the unimaginable scale of the Central Nepal flood catastrophe was becoming apparent. With every notice about a bank branch that lost all its staff, a police station without a single survivor, buses full of Janai Purnima pilgrims swept away, and phone calls to this office from Indian families asking to locate their loved ones &#8212; we have had to come to terms with the tragically high cost in human lives.</p>
<p>Not since the 2015 earthquake has Nepal seen a disaster of this magnitude. In terms of economic damage to infrastructure and property, it is the worst in this country’s history. Remote sensing has enabled us to pinpoint the location of the avalanche on the north face of Langtang in Nepal that blocked the Lhende Khola which flows into the Trisuli in Nepal and which burst last Wednesday morning just before 9 am.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/3/rescue-efforts-continue-as-nepal-china-flood-death-toll-surpasses-1270"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Rescue efforts continue as Nepal-China flood death toll surpasses 1270</a></li>
<li><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/temporary-burial-for-nepal-china-flood-victims">Temporary burial for flood victims in Nepal</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/27/nepal-tibet-floods-what-happened-what-caused-them-and-who-is-missing">Nepal-Tibet floods: What happened, what caused them and who is missing?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/27/satellite-images-show-destruction-from-nepal-tibet-floods">Other Nepal-China flood reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_133046" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-133046" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-133046 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Nepali-Times-logo-300wide.png" alt="NEPALI TIMES" width="300" height="129" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-133046" class="wp-caption-text"><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/"><strong>NEPALI TIMES</strong></a></figcaption></figure>
<p>The debris flow at Timure on the border was nearly 80m high, and as the flood raced downstream it swept everything in its path. It spared nothing.</p>
<p>No one could have predicted this disaster would happen when it did. But anyone could have said it was bound to happen one day. In this newspaper, we ourselves have frequently reminded policy makers about the need to prepare for floods unleashed by extreme weather, glacial lake outburst floods, and transboundary climate calamities.</p>
<p>We said that after the Barun Khola flood of 2017, after the Melamchi disaster of 2021, and after the Teesta flood in Sikkim that swept away a $1 billion dam, we wrote in this space about lessons for Nepal’s own hydroelectric plants on the Arun, Marsyangdi and Trisuli. And the Bhote Kosi flood on July 8 last year was another alarm bell.</p>
<p><strong>Strategy for survival<br />
</strong>Arguing that this is not a problem we created, that we need to be compensated for historical carbon emissions, is for speeches at UN climate summits. There is no money coming for Loss and Damage. We are in this on our own, we have to craft our own strategy for survival.</p>
<p>This was not a &#8220;natural&#8221; disaster. Nothing about it was natural &#8212; not the glacier melting due to greenhouse gas buildup due to fossil fuel burning, not the location of expensive hydropower plants on trans-Himalayan rivers, not designing highways to follow rivers, not the settlements that have grown around them, not the corruption and greed, not the poor governance.</p>
<p>Our ancestors knew not to live next to Himalayan rivers. Nepal’s townships used to be located along high ridgelines, and floodplains were only used to grow food or grind grain. Bridges were temporary, and designed to be rebuilt after monsoon floods washed them away.</p>
<p>Economic desperation, outmigration from rural areas and proximity to roads have pushed people to settle along river banks &#8212; despite full knowledge of the risks. Hazard mapping of settlements along river banks enforced by local governments could have saved many lives last week.</p>
<p>Early warning will be of no help if homes are located right next to rivers flowing down from the world’s youngest and most seismically-active mountain range, now feeling the full impact of the climate crisis.</p>
<p>We have repeated this ad nauseum after every disaster: let us not put all our eggs in one basket. Instead of taking huge loans to invest in cascades of expensive hydroelectric plants on trans-Himalayan rivers, Nepal should opt for smaller projects across the country and spread the risk.</p>
<p>In one fell swoop on Wednesday morning, Nepal lost 440MW from 12 hydroelectric plants &#8212; 10 percent of the country’s total generation capacity. Transmission lines and substations located along the river corridor were destroyed.</p>
<p>A culture of fatalism can explain the lack of interest in preparedness for disaster that we know will happen, and with greater frequency in future. But that is no excuse. Even if previous governments ignored this, Nepal’s new administration with its technocrats and PhDs must take measures to address seismic and climate co-hazards.</p>
<p>Winston Churchill once said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” This disaster also offers the chance for Prime Minister Balendra Shah and his government to demonstrate a proactive approach in search, rescue, rehabilitation and a preparedness strategy for the future.</p>
<p>We should not need a disaster to remind us to be prepared. By then it is too late for many people, as it tragically was this week. We failed to learn our lessons once again. This period of national mourning calls for Nepalis to be united, to show the same spirit of compassion and generosity that we saw in 2015.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://nepalitimes.com/author/sonia-awale">Sonia Awale</a>, editor of the <a href="https://nepalitimes.com/">Nepali Times</a>. First published on 27 August 2026 and republished under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minerals, military strategy draw the eye of Trump to isolated atoll and its 230 people</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/03/minerals-military-strategy-draw-the-eye-of-trump-to-isolated-atoll-and-its-230-people/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 06:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palau-Belau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belt and road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook Islands News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral airstrip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Penrhyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Missionary Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Islands Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penrhyn Atoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second World War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tongareva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=133018</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Milne Isolation has been a challenge for the people of the atoll of Tongareva, 1300km north of the Cook Islands capital on Rarotonga. Distance has made it difficult for the 230 residents to get supplies, or to travel for school and work. There are no scheduled flights; a ship visits every two ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Jonathan Milne</em></p>
<p>Isolation has been a challenge for the people of the atoll of Tongareva, 1300km north of the Cook Islands capital on Rarotonga.</p>
<p>Distance has made it difficult for the 230 residents to get supplies, or to travel for school and work. There are no scheduled flights; a ship visits every two months.</p>
<p>But isolation hasn’t been their greatest enemy; arguably, it’s engagement with the outside world that’s done them more harm. Ever since the crew of a passing English sailing ship, the <em>Lady Penrhyn</em>, dubbed the island Penrhyn in 1788, the people have suffered the colonial ambitions of distant empires.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/03/pacific-islands-forum-should-outside-nations-be-allowed-at-the-leaders-summit/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Pacific Islands Forum: Should outside nations be allowed at the leaders’ summit?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/02/us-expected-to-announce-major-fuel-security-deal-at-pacific-islands-forum/">US expected to announce major fuel security deal at Pacific Islands Forum</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/02/pacific-leaders-urged-to-be-united-behind-2050-climate-action-vision/">Pacific leaders urged to be united behind 2050 climate action vision</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/01/us-pushes-critical-minerals-agenda-in-cook-islands-with-penrhyn-lifeline/">US pushes critical minerals agenda in Cook Islands with Penrhyn ‘lifeline’</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Pacific+Islands+Forum">Other PIF reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Missionaries brought new rules suppressing the language and faith and traditional cultural practices. Sailors brought disease that harmed the people and the plants.</p>
<p>An imported coconut blight led to a catastrophic famine that nearly depopulated the island.</p>
<p>The grimmest tragedy was in the 1860s, when London Missionary Society pastors sold 472 islanders for about five silver dollars a head, as slaves to Peru.</p>
<p>They boarded the Spanish and Peruvian ships with a promise of good pay and a safe return. It was a lie. Most died in exile.</p>
<p><strong>Considering history</strong><br />
Islanders will be quietly considering that history, after news this week that the United States and New Zealand governments will invest $102 million in building a new deepwater port on the atoll, potentially providing a staging post for overseas naval vessels.</p>
<figure style="width: 780px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://i0.wp.com/newsroom.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/DSC05443-scaled.jpg?resize=780%2C519&amp;ssl=1" alt="New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters (from left), Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown and the US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau" width="780" height="519" data-recalc-dims="1" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Either the flags or the politicians got mixed up, as New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters, Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown and the US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau signed a $102 million deal this week to build a new deepwater port. Image: Sam Sachdeva/Newsroom</figcaption></figure>
<p>This is not new; the atoll was home to a US base in the Second World War. American GIs built port infrastructure and a 3000m crushed coral airstrip there.</p>
<p>It became a stopping point for the big Catalina flying boats; stripped hulks of American bombers still sit on the atoll as physical scars of the war. Children grew up who never knew their fathers &#8212; an emotional scar of the war.</p>
<p>There has long been talk &#8212; some supportive, some opposed &#8212; of a deepwater port in Tongareva’s big 233 sq km lagoon, reportedly 90m at its deepest point. Rarotonga businessman Charles Pitt argued in 2009 that the Americans should build commercial interests there, to give them a strategic position between China’s interests to the west in Sāmoa, and French Polynesia to the east.</p>
<p>Pitt warned that Chinese fishing interests were planning to open a business on Penrhyn &#8212; and it was always that potential for Chinese involvement that motivated the greatest concern in US-aligned countries.</p>
<p>In 2018, when I was editing the <em>Sunday Star-Times,</em> we reported on the front page that Cook Islands and Niue had “blindsided” NZ Foreign Minister Winston Peters by signing up to China’s belt and road infrastructure lending scheme, and that there was talk of Beijing financing a deepwater port on Penrhyn.</p>
<p>It was a possibility that some in the islands would have welcomed, as I discovered when our family moved to the Cooks the following year. Henry Puna, the long-serving PM, told me the US had picked up and gone at the end of the war, and never really returned.</p>
<p>China had been “very present” in the Pacific.</p>
<p><strong>America&#8217;s return &#8216;welcome&#8217;</strong><br />
“Unfortunately for a long time, America has not been,” Puna mused. “We would welcome America’s return.”</p>
<p>This all explains why US-aligned Winston Peters (on his return as foreign minister) reacted so angrily last year to Puna’s protegé and successor, Mark Brown, going to Beijing to sign a strategic partnership with China.</p>
<p>Accusing Brown and his officials of a lack of transparency, Peters cut $30 million core development support to the Cook Islands government, impacting on some basic health, education and tourism services.</p>
<p>Now, things have changed. The Cooks government had told me they would welcome America’s return. Well, this week they got it.</p>
<p>The announcement of the construction of a new port on Tongareva has been welcomed by the atoll’s MP, Vaine Wichman, who told the <em><a href="https://www.cookislandsnews.com/internal/national/local/outer-islands/economy/penrhyn-hails-101-million-port-upgrade-backed-by-us-and-nz/">Cook Islands News</a></em> it’s a “landmark investment”.</p>
<figure style="width: 712px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="moz-reader-block-img" src="https://i0.wp.com/newsroom.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/tongareva-port.jpeg?resize=712%2C400&amp;ssl=1" alt="What remains of the Tongareva port that American GIs built 80 years ago" width="712" height="400" data-recalc-dims="1" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">What remains of the port that American GIs built 80 years ago, when 1000 of them were stationed on Tongareva during the Second World War. Image: Julie Taripo/Radio Cook Islands/Newsroom</figcaption></figure>
<p>“Over 80 years after the wartime presence of US forces in Penrhyn, this investment is both historically symbolic and economically transformative,” she says. “Penrhyn was once part of the Pacific’s strategic defence network, and today this partnership reaffirms this.”</p>
<p>It comes just a week after the arrival of a new $5 million government-procured interisland passenger and cargo vessel, offering the hope of better, safer, more secure connectivity to all the remote outer islands.</p>
<p><strong>A Peters &#8216;triumph&#8217;</strong><br />
Some see this as a political triumph for the mercurial Peters in the final weeks of his term as foreign minister; after playing hardball, he dragged the Cooks away from the influence of Beijing.</p>
<p>Others see it as a power play by Mark Brown, who has won the interest and investment of the world’s most powerful nation.</p>
<p>Most of all, none can ignore the opportunity this offers the Trump Administration &#8212; the strategic chance to be able to dock and stage operations from the centre of the vast Pacific basin. And ensuring China can’t.</p>
<p>Moreover, back in February, I reported that MFAT Chief Executive Bede Corry and his diplomats had discussed critical minerals developments with both the US and the Cook Islands. That’s now borne fruit for the White House.</p>
<p>Because this week’s deal opens the door (or the channel) to the $1 billion US-owned American Ocean Minerals Corp and Odyssey Marine Exploration, which agreed to merge this year.</p>
<p>And to Cook Islands Investment Corp’s new partnership with US firm Wetstone to fund offshore mineral exploration. It gives US firms first dibs on what I’ve described as the most lucrative treasure trove of undersea critical minerals in the EEZ of any country in the world.</p>
<p>Yet amid the political back-slapping, some Tongareva locals sound a note of caution. On the atoll’s Facebook group, administrator Ula Tini warns the US and China are readying for conflict &#8212; and the atoll has now been drawn into it.</p>
<p><strong>Tongareva &#8216;been here before&#8217;</strong><br />
“Tongareva has been here before,” he says. “Our ancestors witnessed aircraft, military personnel and major infrastructure arriving on an island that much of the world probably knew very little about.”</p>
<p>Isolation, he agrees, has been one of the atoll’s biggest challenges. This port could help.</p>
<p>“But our people should still ask the hard questions… Could the facilities have future strategic or defence uses? How many jobs and business opportunities will actually go to Tongarevans? What environmental protections will be put in place for our lagoon, reef and marine resources?”</p>
<p>Tini wants his children and grandchildren to inherit more than a new port. That means ensuring that this time, the small community engages with the world on its own terms.</p>
<p>“What is Tongareva’s place in the future of the Pacific — and are we ready for it?”</p>
<p><em><a href="https://newsroom.co.nz/author/jonathan-milne/">Jonathan Milne</a> is managing editor of <a href="https://newsroom.co.nz/">Newsroom</a> and a former editor of the Cook Islands News. This analysis was first published by Newsroom and is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The British state has lost the argument, even as it rigs the trials of genocide opponents</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/09/03/the-british-state-has-lost-the-argument-even-as-it-rigs-the-trials-of-genocide-opponents/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contempt of Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Establishment media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political defendants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Show trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Greenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial by jury]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a stinging rebuke to the judge, the jury members unanimously acquitted Tony Greenstein after just two hours of deliberation. As it turned out, it was not Greenstein on trial; it was British justice, writes Jonathan Cook. ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook The British state rigged the trial of Tony Greenstein, a secular Jewish socialist and ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In a stinging rebuke to the judge, the jury members unanimously acquitted Tony Greenstein after just two hours of deliberation. As it turned out, it was not Greenstein on trial; it was British justice, writes <strong>Jonathan Cook</strong>.<br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Jonathan Cook</em></p>
<div><picture><source type="image/webp" /></picture></div>
<p>The British state rigged the trial of Tony Greenstein, a secular Jewish socialist and peace activist, to get him locked up for as much as 14 years &#8212; supposedly for “inviting support for Hamas”.</p>
<p>Fearful that the judge would punish his barrister for delivering a closing speech that properly defended him, Greenstein instead spoke directly to the jury.</p>
<p>For half an hour, he <a href="https://greghadfield.medium.com/tony-greenstein-the-most-important-half-hour-of-my-life-d03f7877a492">picked apart</a> sham charges relating to three social media posts and a blog article he wrote against Israel’s genocide in Gaza.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>In doing so, he exposed the proceedings as a political show trial &#8212; one of a growing number, designed to silence opposition both to Israel’s genocide in Gaza and to the British state’s complicity in it.</p>
<p>In summing up, Judge Sarah Plaschkes said she had considered referring Greenstein for contempt of court. But instead she dismissed his eloquent, damning address to the jury as a “rambling speech delivered by an old man”.</p>
<p>At that point, presumably, she had no idea what impact Greenstein’s words would have on the jury.</p>
<p>In a stinging rebuke to the judge, the jury members unanimously acquitted him after just two hours of deliberation. As it turned out, it was not Greenstein on trial; it was British justice.</p>
<p><strong>Hearing all the facts</strong><br />
Once given a chance to hear all the facts, not just the ones curated by the Crown, the jury accepted Greenstein’s arguments, including his accusation that the judiciary were readily conniving in the growing authoritarianism unleashed by the UK state’s complicity in genocide.</p>
<p>Which may explain why Greenstein’s landmark victory in a case with huge implications for free speech &#8212; and the right to speak out on the British state’s partnership in Israel’s genocide &#8212; was almost entirely ignored by the establishment media.</p>
<p>Had the jury found against him, you can be sure that same media would have covered the matter extensively, playing its part in sending a message to audiences that they should keep their heads down and avoid showing any solidarity with the Palestinian people or risk sharing Greenstein’s fate.</p>
<p>His acquittal, and the British state’s humiliation, was not a message the state &#8212; or the billionaire-owned media &#8212; wanted publicised.</p>
<p>What Greenstein’s closing speech managed to do was introduce something the British state and its judiciary have been carefully trying to strip out of the current wave of show trials of anti-genocide activists: important context.</p>
<p>Greenstein had to dismiss his barrister for the closing speech because, had the barrister spoken to the jury as Greenstein himself did, he would have most likely shared the fate of another distinguished lawyer, Rajiv Menon KC.</p>
<p>Menon is facing contempt of court proceedings over his masterful closing speech in the trial of six Palestine Action defendants, who were charged with multiple and serious crimes over their efforts to destroy killer-drones produced at a factory in Bristol operated by Israel’s biggest arms maker, Elbit Systems.</p>
<p><strong>Refusal to convict</strong><br />
As a result of Menon’s speech &#8212; you can read the most important passages <a href="https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/barristers-powerful-speech-at-filton">here</a> &#8212; the jury refused to convict any of the defendants of any of the offences for which the state had put them on trial.</p>
<p>The judge in that case, Jeremy Johnson, was so eager to make an example of Menon &#8212; and intimidate other lawyers so they would be dissuaded from giving other Palestine solidarity activists a proper defence &#8212; that he managed to abuse the established legal procedure specifically designed for contempt of court referrals.</p>
<p>The Court of Appeal had to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/may/12/palestine-action-trial-lawyer-wins-appeal-contempt-court-charge">overturn</a> his decision, though it allowed him to reapply for contempt proceedings against Menon, this time using the proper channels. Johnson <a href="https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-action-lawyer-faces-renewed-contempt-proceedings/">did so</a>.</p>
<p>The point is that judges like Johnson and Plaschkes &#8212; faithful servants not of justice but of the British state &#8212; know that no jury will convict activists trying to to stop a genocide if it is framed in those terms. So these judges must rig these trials to keep the jury as ignorant as possible of the relevant context: that the British state is persecuting peace activists for embarrassing it over its collusion in genocide.</p>
<p>That fact was, once again, only too evident during Greenstein’s trial.</p>
<p>Plaschkes was angry throughout the proceedings at Greenstein’s efforts to introduce context to the case. For the prosecution to succeed, she needed the jury to ignore many relevant things about Greenstein’s supposedly “Hamas-supporting” comment about a “ghetto uprising” in Gaza:</p>
<ul>
<li>the context that the one-day breakout from Gaza on 7 October 2023 was a direct response to Israel’s preceding 16-year blockade of Gaza, denying its 2.3 million-strong population the <a href="https://electronicintifada.net/content/israels-starvation-diet-gaza/11810">essentials of life</a> and turning the enclave effectively into a concentration camp;</li>
<li>the context that, following the October 2023 breakout, Israel immediately launched a genocidal campaign of destruction against the enclave’s infrastructure and its civilian population;</li>
<li>the context that, as a secular socialist, Greenstein has been a long-time critic of Hamas, as proven by a stream of articles he has written over more than a decade and that he cited to the jury;</li>
<li>the context that, as the son of Holocaust survivors, he is deeply opposed to one people systematically oppressing another – all the more so given that Jewish Zionists have exploited their people’s historic victimhood to justify Israel committing contemporary crimes against Palestinians;</li>
<li>the context of international law, which states that a people under occupation, the Palestinians, have a right to resist their oppression by Israel, including through the use of violence;</li>
<li>the context that Greenstein had not even mentioned Hamas in posts that were the focus of the trial, or indicated any support for it – only his support for the right in law for Palestinians to resist Israeli crimes;</li>
<li>the context that the British government proscribed the political wing of Hamas under the UK’s terrorism laws only in 2021, not based any new “terror” behaviour – in fact, four years earlier Hamas had <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/01/hamas-new-charter-palestine-israel-1967-borders">rewritten its charter</a>, showing a strong willingness to make concessions to Israel. No, the purpose of proscription was specifically to advance Israel’s goal of intimidating popular, international solidarity with the people of Gaza;</li>
<li>the context that, in prosecuting Greenstein, the British government is destroying the very basis of the right to free speech, all to advance the interests of the demonstrably genocidal state of Israel;</li>
<li>the context that the British state is not some dispassionate arbiter of justice in these prosecutions: it is aggressively colluding in Israel’s crimes. Its huge conflict of interest in silencing critics is the elephant in the room.</li>
</ul>
<p>Greenstein told the jury:</p>
<blockquote><p>Your [verdict] will not stay in this room. If these three posts are terrorism, then the word has a new meaning for everyone in this country. Every student who shares an article. Every pensioner who retweets the wrong opinion. Every writer, every blogger, every one of your neighbours with a social media account and a view about a war.</p>
<p>Can it really be the law of England that any of them – that any of you – will be condemned to 14 years of prison for a tweet? You have the power, today, to answer that question. Whatever your answer is, it will be remembered long after this trial is forgotten.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Masterclass speech</strong><br />
The whole speech is a masterclass in how to speak over the head of a complicit judiciary and prick the conscience of people who still have a moral backbone. I recommend you read it <a href="https://greghadfield.medium.com/tony-greenstein-the-most-important-half-hour-of-my-life-d03f7877a492">in full here</a>.</p>
<p>The British government desperately wanted the scalp of a Jewish activist to show that no one is safe from the state’s long arm of persecution. It failed, which should be cause for relief and celebration among every person who opposes authoritarianism.</p>
<p>The defeats being handed to the British state by juries who hear the actual evidence are adding to the pressures on officials to find new ways to bypass the ancient right of trial by jury.</p>
<p>The government of Keir Starmer was determined to establish the precedent of <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c989p51r7xjo">scrapping</a> jury trials. Faced with the unpopularity of such a move, his successor Andy Burnham has sounded hesitant about advancing the measure. But pledges he made while seeking the Labour leadership &#8212; and prime ministership &#8212; are proving to be worth little now that he is in office.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, courtier-judges like Johnson are finding ways to get around the reluctance of juries to convict anti-genocide activists of serious crimes.</p>
<p>Juries that convict activists of a relatively minor charge of criminal damage for smashing up killer-drones, assuming the defendants will get a few months in prison, are learning that they are thereby handing judges in these trials unlimited powers, in violation of the most basic principles of justice.</p>
<p>After the verdict, judges like Johnson are choosing to rewrite the charge sheet, adding retrospectively what they are bogusly calling a “<a href="https://www.amnesty.org.uk/latest/uk-terrorist-sentence-for-palestine-action-activist-marks-dangerous-move-against-right-to-protest/">terrorism connection</a>”. That means they can sentence the defendants as “terrorists”, leading to far longer jail sentences and destroying the defendants’ lives in perpetuity.</p>
<p><strong>Mark of a justice system</strong><br />
This is the mark of a justice system that no longer cares about evidence, fairness or jury verdicts. It cares only about visible punishment, about spreading terror through the courtroom.</p>
<p>We can fight back. Juries appear to be growing increasingly wary of these highly politicised trials the British state is staging to exonerate itself of its criminal activities and lock up its critics. As judges increasingly abuse the justice system to get the jail sentences demanded by the state, juries are likely to become much less willing to serve as an alibi for state repression.</p>
<p>This is no longer a struggle simply for the Palestinian people’s survival. It is a struggle for ourselves, for our right to have a voice, to have some say in how our societies are run and for whose benefit. It is a struggle to keep the forces of darkness at bay a little while longer.</p>
<p>And it is a battle none of us can afford to lose.</p>
<p><em><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><a href="https://twitter.com/jonathan_k_cook/">Jonathan Cook</a> is a writer, journalist and self-appointed media critic and author of many books about Palestine. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. This article is republished from the <a href="https://jonathancook.substack.com/">author’s Substack</a> with permission.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six months on, Iran is still standing but survival is becoming more costly</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/28/six-months-on-iran-is-still-standing-but-survival-is-becoming-more-costly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12-Day War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assassinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Fury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masoud Pezeshkian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maximun pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mojtaba Khamenei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Economic Outcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shadow fleet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six months mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Israel attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ANALYSIS: By Mahjoob Zweiri It has been six months since the United States and Israel launched their coordinated military campaign against Iran on February 28. The war is easily cast as the latest turn in the long antagonism between Washington and Tehran, but that frame misses its immediate context. Its real context is the aftermath ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Mahjoob Zweiri</em></p>
<p>It has been six months since the United States and Israel launched their coordinated military campaign against Iran on February 28. The war is easily cast as the latest turn in the long antagonism between Washington and Tehran, but that frame misses its immediate context.</p>
<p>Its real context is the aftermath of October 7, 2023: Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza that followed spread across the region, wore down Iran’s network of allies, and pulled Israel and Iran into increasing confrontation, culminating in the 12-day war of June 2025 and the US-Israel campaign launched last February.</p>
<p>The bilateral track only sharpened this trajectory. Nearly eight years before the current war, Trump’s first administration launched “maximum pressure” aimed at driving Iran’s oil exports to zero.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/8/28/iran-war-live-tehran-prepares-conditions-to-open-strait-of-hormuz"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Iran to draft conditions to open Hormuz following mediator requests</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">Other War on Iran reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>When it failed to force political change, economic coercion eventually gave way to military force. Six months on, the campaign has come full circle, back to economic pressure applied with greater force. Economics, then war, then economics again.</p>
<p>At the 100-day mark, Tehran could plausibly present the outcome as a victory of survival: Its adversaries had failed to topple the system, and by its own measure that was what mattered.</p>
<p>Six months on, that claim is harder to sustain because the pressure has shifted to the terrain on which Iran has always been weakest. The question is no longer whether Iran can survive military attack, but whether it can withstand an economic siege with no sign of lifting.</p>
<p><strong>A leadership hollowed out at the top<br />
</strong>The most visible change is at the summit. After the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the opening strike, his son Mojtaba was appointed just more than a week later, a succession Tehran presented as proof of continuity and cohesion.</p>
<p>But six months on, he has yet to make a verified public appearance. His portrait is carried through city squares and at mourning ceremonies, and decrees are issued in his name, while rumours about his condition persist.</p>
<p>A leadership that once drew its authority from the visible presence of a single figure now rests, in part, on an absence.</p>
<p>The state has also had to rebuild its command structure in the middle of the war. The opening strike killed IRGC commander Mohammad Pakpour and armed forces chief-of-staff Abdolrahim Mousavi, while other senior commanders were slain in the weeks that followed.</p>
<p>On August 10, decrees issued in Mojtaba’s name formalised a new military leadership, including Ahmad Vahidi as IRGC chief and Ali Abdollahi as chief-of-staff.</p>
<p>The appointments appear to favour loyalty and continuity over change and were widely read as a signal that Tehran did not intend to soften its posture. The deeper significance is simpler: A state still rebuilding its high command in the sixth month of a war is not doing so from a position of strength.</p>
<p><strong>From maximum pressure to ‘Economic Outcast’<br />
</strong>The clearest sign that the war has returned to its economic origins is the campaign Washington has intensified since suspending strikes in early August. US officials had already branded the broader effort “Economic Fury”; on August 24, the Treasury launched Operation Economic Outcast, an expanded campaign aimed at severing Iran’s remaining financial links with the outside world.</p>
<p>Its instruments are familiar from the pre-war “maximum pressure” era but are being applied more aggressively: Secondary sanctions on those moving Iranian oil, measures against its “shadow fleet” and financial networks, and greater enforcement of international sanctions.</p>
<p>Iran’s oil exports, near 1.8 million barrels a day before the war, have fallen to below half a million; inflation is approaching 90 percent, with food prices more than double what they were a year ago.</p>
<p>Yet the siege lands on an economy whose troubles were never solely the work of sanctions.</p>
<p>Iran had long failed to insulate itself from an architecture built over decades, from US sanctions dating to the 1980s to United Nations Security Council resolutions since 2006.</p>
<p>Neither the 25-year, $400 billion partnership with China nor the strategic treaty signed with Russia in early 2025 delivered the stability Tehran sought. Before the war, Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian had acknowledged that sanctions alone could not account for the depth of the crisis and that governance bore its share.</p>
<p>The economic weapon works in part because the state it targets was already structurally exposed.</p>
<p>That pressure is now enforced at sea. Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation on February 28 and, six months on, it has not reopened; the naval blockade that followed has fused with the closure into a single chokehold on Iran’s trade.</p>
<p><strong>Diverging narratives in Tehran<br />
</strong>That structural exposure is forcing a longstanding divergence into the open. For years, Iran’s leadership has explained its crises through two competing narratives: One, advanced by the political leadership, acknowledging failures of economic governance; the other, promoted by the security establishment, attributing unrest to external enemies.</p>
<p>Under the pressure of the siege, that divergence has sharpened into a disagreement over the war itself. President Pezeshkian, who signed the June memorandum with Washington, has spoken with growing candour about an economy giving way, saying this month that Iran’s difficulties have “multiplied several times over” as revenue has fallen.</p>
<p>On August 21, he argued that it would be “better to end [the war] today, while we are in a position of strength”, even as his government prepared Iranians for painful increases in fuel prices.</p>
<p>Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has put the danger more bluntly: “No matter how much military power we have, if the people are hungry and there is no financial circulation, economic growth, or national production, we will not endure.”</p>
<p>Yet he remains tied to the security establishment’s logic, insisting diplomacy carries weight only when backed by readiness for war and casting Washington’s economic turn as an admission of military failure.</p>
<p>That Iran’s two most senior civilian figures now say publicly that hunger, not bombardment, is the greatest threat marks a shift from the confident rhetoric of the war’s first months. It has not settled the argument over who is responsible, only raised its stakes.</p>
<p>Six months on, Iran’s leadership still measures the war by the standard it set at the outset: The system has not fallen, and everything else it considers recoverable. By that measure, survival remains a form of victory.</p>
<p><strong>Pressure now falls on household</strong><br />
But the pressure now falls on the household and the market, where it is harder to answer with the language of resistance. The divide between a president urging an end to the war and a security establishment determined to outlast it is no longer concealed.</p>
<p>The war has also produced the terms of its own possible end. The closed strait and the blockade have become the centre of gravity for diplomacy. Reopening the strait and lifting the blockade are the levers each side holds over the other and the most plausible opening for negotiations that could bring the conflict to a close.</p>
<p>This leaves Iran with a difficult choice. To negotiate a settlement on terms Washington would accept risks provoking the internal fracture the hardliners fear; to hold out risks a bleeding economy and a winter that will test the state’s capacity to provide.</p>
<p>The war has also reinforced, within parts of the leadership, the conviction that only a nuclear capability could have deterred the initial attack, making any lasting settlement harder to reach.</p>
<p>Beneath these immediate pressures lies a more enduring pattern. The confrontation between Washington and Tehran has always been, at its core, a contest shaped by what the political elites of the two countries believe about each other and about the risks of dealing with each other.</p>
<p>On the Iranian side, US hostility has repeatedly deepened divisions within the political elite rather than compelling agreement, reinforcing its reluctance to make bold decisions about negotiating with the US.</p>
<p>Pressure intended to force Tehran’s hand has instead hardened the hesitation it sought to break, compounding Iran’s political and economic strains.</p>
<p>Six months into this war, that pattern is again on display: the campaign has come full circle to the economic weapon it began with, the Iranian elite is more divided, and the bold decision a settlement would require remains as distant as ever.</p>
<p>There is little sign that this cycle will end soon.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://www.mzweiri.com/#about">Professor Mahjoob Zweiri</a> is an academic and senior political analyst specialising in Iran and Middle East politics. This article was first published by Al Jazeera and republished under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caitlin Johnstone: All it takes is one crack in the lie we’ve been sold</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/28/caitlin-johnstone-all-it-takes-is-one-crack-in-the-lie-weve-been-sold/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belief systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth-based worldview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncomfortable truths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unravelling thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World of lies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone I saw a clip going around from the Netflix series “1899” where a woman discovers a crack in the screen of what she had taken to be her world, causing her entire understanding of reality to crumble before her eyes. Someone had captioned the clip, “Every awakening begins with a fracture ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Caitlin Johnstone</em></p>
<p>I saw a <a href="https://x.com/benwehrman/status/2088479698791629252" target="_blank" rel="noopener">clip going around</a> from the Netflix series “1899” where a woman discovers a crack in the screen of what she had taken to be her world, causing her entire understanding of reality to crumble before her eyes.</p>
<p>Someone had captioned the clip, “Every awakening begins with a fracture in the lie.”</p>
<p>Yeah. It does tend to happen like that.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBRzPgxp9qI" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>LISTEN:</strong> A reading by Tim Foley</a></li>
</ul>
<p>You start pulling on one thread and then the whole thing unravels. Maybe you start with the Iraq war lies. Maybe 9/11. These days for a lot of folks it’s Palestine.</p>
<p>https://youtube.com/shorts/NcCwpbaCW24</p>
<p>You keep pulling on that thread, uncovering more and more uncomfortable truths, until eventually you discover that pretty much everything you’ve been taught about your world was a lie.</p>
<p>Every war. Everything about how your government really operates. Everything you’ve been told about nations and how they work. Everything about capitalism and communism and how your society is structured. It was all lies, fed to you by parents, teachers, preachers, pundits, politicians and news men from the moment you were old enough to process complex thought.</p>
<p>It can feel scary. It can feel like the end of your world, because in a sense that’s exactly what it is. Your sincere pursuit of the truth leads to the unraveling of everything you thought you knew, and you find yourself plunging into a great abyss of uncertainty about what’s real.</p>
<p>And a lot of people do get lost at this juncture. They plunge down too many rabbit holes with too much paranoia and not enough critical thinking, and they wind up replacing all their old indoctrinated belief systems with new beliefs that are just as crazy and power-serving as the first ones. There’s often a gap between letting go of your old worldview and assembling a new one where it’s easy to get confused and misled.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JBRzPgxp9qI?si=udmJe0uRwRh3cAS3" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p>But if you remain sincere, careful, relentlessly self-honest and dedicated to the truth while ensuring your critical thinking faculties remain operating at full power, you eventually emerge from this chrysalis phase with the wings of a truth-based worldview. You can now not only see through the old lies, but can understand what’s really going on in the world.</p>
<p>And what’s really going on in the world is a lot less pleasant than the fictions you were fed as a schoolchild. You can see that we are ruled by a transnational alliance of plutocrats and government agencies who manipulate world affairs to maximise their power and profits at the expense of ordinary working people around the globe, and you can see that those same powerful abusers are responsible for constructing the fictional power-serving worldview you just freed yourself from.</p>
<p>And when you see how unpleasant the truth is and how hard you had to work to realise it, you understand why relatively few people have awakened to it. From the perspective of the ego, it’s a whole lot of effort and discomfort without much in the way of payoff. Forming a truth-based worldview is something you do for its own sake, and if you’re not the sort of person who views truth as its own reward, then you’re not the sort of person who’s likely to pursue it.</p>
<p>But more and more people are choosing truth. More and more people are spotting a loose thread labeled “Gaza” or “Epstein” or what have you, and giving it a curious tug. Despite the discomfort, despite the required effort, and despite the great cost of having to sacrifice the world they thought they knew, they’re pulling that thread, and they keep on pulling. We’re seeing it more and more every year.</p>
<p>And that gives me hope. I don’t know where this is headed or whether we win in the end, but I’m seeing enough movement in human consciousness at mass scale to continue holding out hope for a better world.</p>
<p><a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/"><em>Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em> is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include <a href="https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-un-torture-report-on-assange-is-an-indictment-of-our-entire-society-bc7b0a7130a6">The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society</a>. She publishes a website and <a href="https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/">Caitlin’s Newsletter</a>. This article is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comedian&#8217;s Australian visa sabotaged, war crimes suspects cheered through</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/27/comedians-visa-sabotaged-war-crimes-suspects-cheered-through/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bassem Youssef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza kill lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli Defence Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael West Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney Harbour Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist Council of NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionist military]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Israel lobby has tried to sabotage comic Bassem Youssef from entering Australia while the government gives a free pass to IDF soldiers suspected of war crimes. Andrew Brown writes on the joke that could not enter Australia, and the army that could for Michael West Media. COMMENTARY: By Andrew Brown On Sunday morning, before ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Israel lobby has tried to sabotage comic Bassem Youssef from entering Australia while the government gives a free pass to IDF soldiers suspected of war crimes. Andrew Brown writes on the joke that could not enter Australia, and the army that could for <strong><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/">Michael West Media</a>.</strong></em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Andrew Brown</em></p>
<p>On Sunday morning, before the sun is over Sydney Heads, up to 40 current and former soldiers of the Israel &#8220;Defence&#8221; Forces (IDF) will jog across the Sydney Harbour Bridge with numbers pinned to their chests and a cheer squad waiting at the Opera House.</p>
<blockquote><p>On Thursday night in Perth, a stage will be empty.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bassem Youssef will not be on it. Home Affairs wanted an FBI clearance and a criminal record from Egypt, whose generals forced him into exile in 2014. His passport had lapsed.</p>
<p>Cairo took its time. The tour is gone.</p>
<p>Youssef performed here in 2023 and 2015 without a police certificate. He did not change. The lobby did.</p>
<p>In June, Peter Wertheim of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry told <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em> his organisation had gone to Home Affairs to have Youssef kept out.</p>
<p>His stated principle was that anyone with a record of “debased generalisations about entire national or religious communities” should never be granted a visa. Hold that sentence. We will come back to it.</p>
<p>Home Affairs will not say what it did with Wertheim’s request. The paperwork did the job a refusal would have done, and no minister had to sign it.</p>
<p>Now the IDF runners in the Sydney Marathon.</p>
<p>Their trip is paid for by the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council and the Zionist Council of NSW, which calls them a “peace delegation”. They run for the Israeli charity Shalva, and Shalva has published their profiles.</p>
<p><strong>IDF war crimes suspects<br />
</strong>Meet First Lieutenant Roy Oryon. Shalva’s profile says he served as deputy commander of Company B, 13th Battalion, Golani Brigade, through what Israel calls the Swords of Iron War.</p>
<p>He led his men on October 7. Company B lost 18 soldiers that day and he wears 18 flowers tattooed on his skin for them.</p>
<p>The profile does not say where Company B went next. Golani’s 13th Battalion went into Gaza. It is the brigade whose reconnaissance battalion, before dawn on 23 March 2025, fired on a convoy of ambulances outside Rafah for more than five minutes, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/31/israel-killed-15-palestinian-paramedics-and-rescue-workers-one-by-one-says-un">killed 15 medics and rescue workers</a>, then bulldozed the bodies and the crushed vehicles into the sand for eight days.</p>
<p>The IDF’s own inquiry admitted its deputy commander fired on the convoy himself and filed a false report. He was sacked. Nobody was charged.</p>
<p>Meet Oryan Omer. His LinkedIn lists five years in Israeli Military Intelligence to 2020.</p>
<p>Meet Yael Zafarti. Her LinkedIn shows six years in Unit 8200, Israel’s signals intelligence arm, and the title Head of Cyber Security Analysis from April 2024 to January 2026.</p>
<p>Unit 8200 is the unit that <em>+972 Magazine</em> and <em>The Guardian</em> identified as the builder of the artificial intelligence systems that generated Gaza’s kill lists. It is also the unit a Western security source told Reuters helped develop the booby-trapped pagers that exploded across Lebanon on 17-18 September 2024, blinding and maiming more than 3000 people and killing at least 37, two of them children.</p>
<p>Zafarti was running cyber analysis for the unit at the time. She now works as a product manager in Tel Aviv.</p>
<p>These are the people the Zionist Council of NSW is inviting Sydney to applaud over drinks.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">IDF soldiers, including Golani Brigade ex-Gaza, to compete in Sydney Marathon<a href="https://x.com/hashtag/whatsthescam?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#whatsthescam</a> <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/auspol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#auspol</a> <a href="https://t.co/MDISUlp8nT">https://t.co/MDISUlp8nT</a></p>
<p>— <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4a7.png" alt="💧" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />Michael West (@MichaelWestBiz) <a href="https://x.com/MichaelWestBiz/status/2092066484462010475?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 25, 2026</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<p><strong>Tony Burke MIA<br />
</strong>The International Court of Justice found the genocide case against Israel plausible in January 2024. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister.</p>
<p>In September 2025, the UN Commission of Inquiry, with Australian barrister Chris Sidoti on the panel, found Israel had committed genocide in Gaza. Sidoti has said Israeli personnel who served there should be interrogated wherever they land.</p>
<blockquote><p>They are landing here. And nobody is asking them anything.</p></blockquote>
<p>Section 501 of the Migration Act says a person fails the character test where there is reason to conclude they were involved in genocide, a crime against humanity or a war crime. No conviction is required. Families for Palestine put that section to Tony Burke on Tuesday.</p>
<p>He has not replied.</p>
<p>His department has the mechanism. In December 2024, two Israeli siblings were sent a 13-page military service form asking whether they had abused detainees or taken part in war crimes. Home Affairs called it routine. So here is the question.</p>
<p><strong>The question<br />
</strong>Was that routine form sent to 40 soldiers arriving together, with a sponsor, a promoter and a Facebook page? If yes, say so.</p>
<p>If no, explain why a comedian needed clearances from two governments to tell jokes, while a Golani lieutenant needed nothing but a bib.</p>
<p>Burke is not squeamish about the power. He cancelled Simcha Rothman’s visa a year ago and refused Ayelet Shaked and Hillel Fuld. Each time, the lobby howled that Jews were being punished for opinions.</p>
<p>Now go back to Wertheim’s sentence.</p>
<p><em>Debased generalisations about entire national communities.</em> He wrote it on behalf of an organisation that has spent two years defending an army whose commanders are wanted by the ICC and whose conduct a UN inquiry has called genocide.</p>
<p>He asked the government to ban a comedian for words. His movement is importing a Golani officer and a Unit 8200 department head for a party.</p>
<p>That is not a double standard. It is a single standard, applied with total consistency.</p>
<blockquote><p>Israelis are protected. Their critics are processed.</p></blockquote>
<p>The runners cross the Bridge at dawn. Youssef will reapply from Los Angeles. <em>MWM</em> has asked Home Affairs whether any of the delegation was sent the military service form and whether AIJAC or the ECAJ lobbied for them.</p>
<p>We will print the answer. We are not expecting one.</p>
<div data-profile-layout="layout-1" data-author-ref="user-2841" data-box-layout="slim" data-box-position="below" data-multiauthor="false" data-author-id="2841" data-author-type="user" data-author-archived="">
<div>
<h5><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/andrew-brown/"> Andrew Brown</a> is a Sydney businessman in the health products sector, former Deputy Mayor of Mosman and Palestine peace activist. First published by Michael West Media and republished with permission.</em></h5>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam Johnson: Coverage of my media book being banned proves the thesis</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/26/adam-johnson-coverage-of-my-media-book-being-banned-proves-the-thesis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antisemitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bondi Beach massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book banning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Sell a Genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media intimidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smear campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sydney Morning Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waverley Public Library]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Waverley Council in Sydney has removed a book strongly critical of Israel from its library shelves for review after a survivor of the Bondi Beach massacre condemned its prominent display as &#8220;deeply insensitive&#8221;. The book&#8217;s author has defended his publication, saying the episode is a good lesson in how the smearing of Palestine and its ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Waverley Council in Sydney has removed a book strongly critical of Israel from its library shelves for review after a survivor of the Bondi Beach massacre condemned its prominent display as &#8220;deeply insensitive&#8221;.</em> <em>The book&#8217;s author has defended his publication, saying the episode is a good lesson in how the smearing of Palestine and its defenders operates in mainstream Anglosphere media.</em><br />
<strong><br />
ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Adam Johnson</em></p>
<p>Last week,<a href="https://www.jwire.com.au/waverley-council-removes-controversial-gaza-book/"> JWire</a> reported that my book, <a href="https://www.plutobooks.com/product/how-to-sell-a-genocide/"><em>How to Sell a Genocide: The Media’s Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza</em></a>, had been “removed” from the Waverley public library in Sydney, Australia.</p>
<p>In covering the ban, some Australian media allowed pro-Israel propagandists to casually libel me as antisemitic, a false charge that is completely divorced from the content of the book, which is nuanced and fair and takes on universal themes of human dignity and opposition to colonialism and racism.</p>
<p>My first instinct was to merely post on social media about the banning, noting how absurd and racist the book ban defenders’ logic was, and move on with my life.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://theconversation.com/how-to-sell-a-genocide-has-been-removed-from-a-library-near-bondi-but-libraries-represent-freedom-of-thought-289988"><strong>READ MORE: </strong>How to Sell a Genocide has been removed from a library near Bondi – but libraries represent freedom of thought</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.jwire.com.au/waverley-council-removes-controversial-gaza-book/">Waverley Council removes controversial Gaza book after Bondi survivor speaks out</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Israeli+censorship">Other Israeli censorship reports</a></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_132638" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132638" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132638 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall.jpg" alt="How To Sell a Genocide cover" width="300" height="463" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall-194x300.jpg 194w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/How-to-sell-a-genocide-PP-300tall-272x420.jpg 272w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132638" class="wp-caption-text">How To Sell a Genocide cover. Image: Pluto Press</figcaption></figure>
<p>After all, my book is not the story &#8212; nor, if it were, would this be a particular interesting one. On the list of free speech suppressions and libel in the past three years over Palestine, this wouldn’t crack the top 10,000.</p>
<p>But news of the ban was subsequently picked up by<em><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2026/aug/18/sydney-waverley-library-removes-book-how-to-sell-a-genocide-from-shelves-ntwnfb"> The Guardian Australia</a>,</em><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/israel-palestine-genocide-gaza-adam-johnson-sydney-library-b3034756.html"><em> Th</em>e Independent in the UK</a> and the largest newspaper in Australia,<em><a href="https://www.smh.com.au/culture/books/sydney-council-pulls-book-critical-of-israel-from-library-shelves-20260818-p60pff.html"> The Sydney Morning Herald</a></em>. And given how poor the coverage of the banning has been, namely by the latter two outlets, I thought this episode could be a good object lesson in how the smearing of Palestine and its defenders operates in mainstream Anglosphere media.</p>
<p>The fact that you can sling around libel without evidence in the largest newspapers in Australia gives us a window into how discussion of basic Palestinian rights is shut down using the most sectarian framing possible.</p>
<p>Let’s break down three tropes featured in the coverage of my book banning that I also detail in the book itself. Forgive me if this is meta &#8212; and a touch self-indulgent &#8212; but there’s a reason there are striking similarities, and it’s because the Israel lobby and its aggressive PR apparatus more or less use the same script for every act of smearing, censoring, and intimidation.</p>
<p>So they’re worth taking this opportunity to unpack.</p>
<p><strong>1. Feigned credulity: Taking pro-Israel crybully organisations at their word, rounding up to the most sectarian framing possible, and flattening Jewish identity and Zionist ideological activity.</strong></p>
<p><em>The Independent</em> and <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> largely embrace the pro-Israel lobby’s framing that the removal of my book was prompted entirely by, or at least largely by, a “complaint from a Bondi attack survivor”. <em>The Independent’s</em> Stuti Mishra would adopt this framing in its headline: “Australian library pulls book on Gaza from shelves after complaint from Bondi attack survivor,” the article announces.</p>
<p><em>The Sydney Morning Herald’s</em> Melanie Kembrey would also accept this framing at face value in her reporting, writing that, “the move follows a report by Jewish news service JWire last week that a survivor of the Bondi Beach massacre had posted on Facebook that she was distressed to see the book displayed on the new-release ‘What’s Hot’ shelf of Waverley Library.”</p>
<p>What’s important to emphasise here is: we have no way of knowing that this is what caused, or even sparked, the removal of the book. This is just an assertion made by those seeking to ban it.</p>
<p><em>JWire</em> reported, citing an alleged Facebook comment by the survivor in question, that her complaint is what prompted the book’s removal. But <em>The Guardian</em> reports that they were “unable to locate the Facebook post” in question.</p>
<p>More importantly, both <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> and <em>The Independent</em> seemingly contradict, or at least undermine, this simplistic narrative, by mentioning elsewhere in their articles that, as <em>The Independent noted,</em> the library council “has received multiple complaints about [the book]”.</p>
<p>So was the book banned because a Bondi attack survivor complained, or was it due to the “multiple complaints”? Or was it both? If it was both, do we know which came first: the Bondi survivor complaint or the “multiple” other complaints from, presumably, unrelated parties?</p>
<p>The timeline is important because it suggests a fairly bog standard pro-Israel propaganda technique of front-loading censorship &#8212; and other oppressive and illiberal actions &#8212; in the most sympathetic and humane language possible. Obviously, “Pro-Israel Organisations Successfully Ban Book on Gaza” hits differently than “Library pulls book on Gaza from shelves after complaint from Bondi attack survivor.”</p>
<p>After all, what kind of heartless monster would want to upset a Bondi attack survivor?</p>
<p>Alex Ryvchin, co-chief executive officer of the pro-Israel lobbying organisation ECAJ, was eager to praise my book’s removal from the library, telling <em>The Sydney Morning Herald</em>, “A book of this sort has no place on the shelves of a library, especially one within minutes of where Australians were slaughtered in large part due to the dehumanisation of Jews precisely through this sort of libel.</p>
<p>&#8220;I commend the individual who spotted the book, herself a survivor of the massacre, and acted to have it removed.”</p>
<p>Was Ryvchin one of the other “multiple” parties that demanded my book be removed? If so, was it prior to the aforementioned Bondi survivor’s complaint? Did <em>The Herald</em> inquire about his involvement in the campaign to remove the book? Did <em>The Herald</em> ask him to specify examples or provide any evidence of me “dehumanising” Jewish people, a false and libelous accusation?</p>
<p>They did not. He is simply presented as a neutral observer with no involvement in the censorship campaign.</p>
<p>I sent a request for comment to the Waverley library last week, to try and pin down the timeline of the “complaints”. They replied this morning but ignored the question, instead objecting to my use of the word “ban” but not denying it was, indeed, banned.</p>
<p>“Contrary to some media reporting,” the library’s manager informed me via email, “the council has not ‘banned’ the book. It remains a part of our collection; however, it is currently unable to be borrowed pending completion of a review.”</p>
<p>Ah, ok, it wasn’t banned, it’s just “currently unavailable to be borrowed”. Well never mind then. Hopefully this “review” goes my way! A group of organisers in Australia have started a <a href="https://www.change.org/p/restore-how-to-sell-a-genocide-to-waverley-library-and-protect-the-public-s-right-to-read?recruiter=1427226572&amp;recruited_by_id=d6f47200-9dbd-11f1-9e5a-03c7216d6789&amp;utm_source=share_petition&amp;utm_campaign=starter_onboarding_share_personal&amp;utm_medium=copylink&amp;share_id=2CFRPTxTJT">petition</a> calling on the library to restore the book and “protect the public’s right to read”.</p>
<p>But, again, it’s important to make clear that my book being “removed” from one public library isn’t the story. The story is that this is only one part of a broader censorship and bully regime that is rapidly escalating in the West.</p>
<p>This story comes in the context of a massive crackdown on Free Speech in Australia, in particular, which is overwhelmingly targeting pro-Palestine speech and being done in the name of “combating antisemitism”. As Jacob Mchangama and Samantha Barbas<a href="https://www.ms.now/opinion/bondi-beach-australia-antisemitism-hate-speech-crackdown"> noted for <em>MSNOW</em></a> in January, “what began as a moment of national mourning [in the wake of the Bondi attack] has rapidly turned into one of the most sweeping expansions of hate speech laws and protest restriction powers in the country’s modern history.</p>
<p>Intended as an urgent response to antisemitism, <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.npr.org/2025/12/18/nx-s1-5647854/australia-to-review-migration-laws-after-bondi-beach-shooting__;!!HqJSLGM!puVEr_OxEiYT_y_5ZQ2zqSM2SQXhuAWRpr7eB7JwInjtyS-5yDRiVdIUljSf1qYHaKK1glwDCoqtyd78E8buvyuuhVtRt6OoOAs$">new federal</a> and<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/world/australia/new-laws-protests-hate-speech.html__;!!HqJSLGM!puVEr_OxEiYT_y_5ZQ2zqSM2SQXhuAWRpr7eB7JwInjtyS-5yDRiVdIUljSf1qYHaKK1glwDCoqtyd78E8buvyuuhVtRg0h24Qs$"> state measures</a> threaten to reach far beyond violence or direct incitement &#8212; reshaping how speech, protest and political dissent are regulated in the wake of terrorism.”</p>
<p>As I detail in said book, namely Chapter 8, “‘Antisemitism’ show trials and the smearing of campus protests,” framing suppression of Israel-critical speech in terms of sensitivity, anti-racism, and “fighting hate” is a textbook pro-Israel bully tactic.</p>
<p>Using liberalism against itself is a consistent and well-documented strategy from Zionist organisations to delegitimise, stigmatise, and brand as hateful those who are meaningfully critical of Israel and its regime of violence against Palestinians.</p>
<p>It’s useful here to distinguish <em>The Guardian’s</em> coverage from that of <em>The Sydney Morning Herald </em>and <em>The Independent.</em> <em>The Guardian’s</em> framing was mostly sceptical and fair. They sought comment from me, my publisher, and other critics of the book ban, and did not overly indulge the “Bondi survivor”.</p>
<p>I should also note that <em>Sydney Morning Herald’s</em> Kembrey did reach out to me for comment, but did so at 12:41 am central time and published her article a couple hours later. So alas, not being awake in the middle of the night costs me an original comment in <em>The Herald.</em> Though I doubt it would have mattered much in the overall credulous and uncritical orientation of the article.</p>
<p>The framing of the ban on my book as the ah shucks, entirely organic result of a “Bondi survivor,” without any interrogation of the source of these “multiple” other complaints, is doing 90 percent of the heavy lifting for the Zionist censorship lobby that was eager to not only praise the decision in the pages of <em>The Sydney Morning Herald,</em> but frame it in purely sectarian terms. That <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> and <em>The Independent</em> ran with the simplistic and manipulative “Bondi survivor complained” framing, without an ounce of scepticism, shows how these Israel advocacy organisations score major PR victories before the text of the article or any reporting is even done.</p>
<p>2<strong>. Reducing claims of genocide in Gaza to a fringe, subjective opinion by a “self-described radical publisher” while omitting it is the overwhelming consensus of human rights and humanitarian organizations, as well as genocide scholars.</strong></p>
<p>The reduction of mainstream opposition to Israel as an unserious or fringe position &#8212; while ignoring how widespread and obvious it is outside the corridors of beltway elite circles &#8212; is a trope I detailed in Chapter 9 of my book specially under the section, “The Atlantic And The Importance Of Policing Seriousness.”</p>
<p>All three articles framed the fact that Israel committed genocide in Gaza as a mere opinion of mine, without noting it is the broad consensus in the humanitarian and human rights world, as well as that of scholars tasked with studying and determining such matters.</p>
<p>While all three quoted me making this point, they did not <em>report on the fact of this consensus</em>. This isn’t just a vague feeling from a partisan leftwing media critic<em> &#8212; it’s the majority academic assessment</em>. They ought to have noted, as I detailed in my unpublished full comment to <em>The Guardian,</em> that genocide in Gaza<a href="https://zeteo.com/p/who-says-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-list-politicians-countries"> is the determination</a> of Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Doctors Without Borders, B’Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights &#8212; Israel, and the International Association of Genocide Scholars, as well as Omer Bartov, Israeli-American professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Brown University; Amos Goldberg, Israeli professor in the Department of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Raz Segal, Israeli historian and associate professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies and endowed professor in the Study of Modern Genocide at Stockton University, among dozens of other prominent Israeli and American scholars.</p>
<p>Instead of mentioning any of these liberal validators, that would have shown how fringe the book ban advocates’ position is and how mainstream my headline was, it is presented as a mere claim by the book’s author and we are then served up pat denials from Israel.</p>
<p>“Israel has repeatedly denied committing genocide in Gaza,” notes <em>The Independent</em> (though it does link to an article detailing UN’s claims of genocide). <em>The Guardian</em> writes that “Israel has repeatedly denied that it has committed genocide in Gaza” without highlighting the major humanitarian and human rights groups arguing otherwise.</p>
<p>The fact of Israel committing genocide in Gaza is overwhelming consensus among those tasked with documenting and determining such matters. Presenting this objective reality as <em>my opinion</em>, without citing the underlying evidence supporting it, is playing into the idea the “genocide” label is a fringe or emotionally charged label when it is anything but.</p>
<p><strong>3. Casually conflating Palestine solidarity with antisemitism and ISIS-inspired violence.</strong></p>
<p>The whole point of focusing on the Bondi survivor complainant is, of course, to conflate solidarity with Palestine with the Bondi attack, which was an ISIS-inspired massacre last December that killed 15 Australians (14 of<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgz15d5718o"> whom were Jewish</a>) and had absolutely zero to do with Palestine, Palestinians, or Gaza.</p>
<p>Indeed, the only major player in Palestine with significant links to ISIS is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who<a href="https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-06-05/ty-article/israel-arming-isis-affiliated-anti-hamas-gaza-militia-ex-defense-chief-claims/00000197-3f88-d079-ab97-7fcdd7120000"> Israeli outlet <em>Haaretz</em> reported last year</a> has been arming ISIS-linked gangs in Gaza to undermine Hamas and steal aid, a fact<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-hamas-war-netanyahu-arming-gangs-gaza-clans-activated/"> publicly confirmed</a> by Netanyahu’s former Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman.</p>
<p>Despite it having no factual basis, conflation of Palestinian militants, civil society and advocacy with “ISIS,” as I note in Chapter 1 of my book, “‘40 beheaded babies,’ the ISIS-ification of Hamas, and how to prime the American public for revenge,” was crucial to propagandising Western audiences and using the blunt instrument of Islamophobia to build sympathy for the cause of open-ended Israeli violence.</p>
<p>None of the above outlets felt it necessary to note that there has been no proven link between the Bondi Attack and Palestine solidarity. The Australian government has spent millions attempting to find such a connection, but<a href="https://jacobin.com/2026/01/australia-bondi-antisemitism-protest-palestine"> alas has come up empty</a>.</p>
<p>Why should pro-Israel advocates be permitted to casually make such a conflation without any reporters noting these two things are wholly unrelated? Why is this conflation of ISIS and Palestine solidarity permitted to be repeated without any attempt to correct this misconception? Perceptions on the part of a handful of motivated actors is not sufficient reason to indulge their delusions.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, racist conspiracy theories conflating Gaza advocacy with violence inspired by a movement and cause that has zero to do with Palestinians, and is largely<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/who-s-funding-isis-wealthy-gulf-angel-investors-officials-say-n208006"> backed by Israel’s regional allies</a>, is permitted without any pushback because these two things, in the Western, orientalist mind, feel vaguely related.</p>
<p>These are subtle interventions by the above outlets and, as I mention, far from the biggest crimes in Western media related to Palestine. I am not a free speech martyr, <a href="https://thejewishindependent.com.au/cancellation-library-book-controversy/">as some have alleged</a>, nor do I seek to be. But I think it is useful to note how, when reporting on the banning of a book about media propaganda, we saw at least three of the very tropes detailed in the book being banned.</p>
<p>These subtle framings, while seemingly minor in isolation, add up. They go, before one even notices, from lazy tropes, credulous reporting, and racist assumptions to a narrative, a <em>story</em>. Just like that, the banning of a perfectly sober, rigorous, and nuanced book is framed as a <em>small act of kindness for a terrorism victim</em>.</p>
<p>And the author, who went out of his way to be nonsectarian, to examine universal humanitarian themes, and to highlight Jewish anti-Zionist activism, is accused of horrific dehumanisation in Sydney’s largest newspaper without any pushback or deeper reporting.</p>
<p>The overt suppression of free speech in Australia is another major escalation, and embracing this grimy, misleading, and libelous framing without much thought or scepticism &#8212; as <em>The Independent</em> and <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> did — is yet another example of Western media’s role in selling genocide.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://substack.com/@thecolumn">Adam Johnson</a> is a media analyst and co-host of the podcast </em>Citations Needed<em>. His writing has been featured in </em>The Nation, In These Times, The Intercept, Los Angeles Times,<em> and </em>San Francisco Chronicle<em>. Republished from the substack <a href="https://substack.com/@thecolumn">The Column</a> under Creative Commons.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Daily, collaborations, media education and Pacific outreach</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/24/china-daily-collaborations-media-education-and-pacific-outreach/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 11:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pacific Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China in Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media globalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporters Without Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western media bias]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By David Robie, editor of Asia Pacific Report Some years ago when I headed the Pacific Media Centre that I founded at Auckland University of Technology, we ran a postgraduate internship programme at the China Daily in Beijing. It was part of a professional development exposure platform that also included Jakarta in Indonesia and ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By David Robie, editor of <a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/">Asia Pacific Report</a></em></p>
<p>Some years ago when I headed the <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/index.html">Pacific Media Centre</a> that I founded at Auckland University of Technology, we ran a postgraduate internship programme at the <em>China Daily</em> in Beijing.</p>
<p>It was part of a professional development exposure platform that also included Jakarta in Indonesia and the Manila in the Philippines, along with several media and university journalism campus outlets in the Pacific, including the University of the South Pacific.</p>
<p>There was nothing else comparable at other journalism programmes in New Zealand, and now there are no opportunities of this kind after the <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01296612.2022.2118802">closure of the PMC in 2021</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://rsf.org/en/china-s-growing-grip-solomon-islands-fragile-media-sector"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> China’s growing grip on the Solomon Islands’ fragile media sector</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.asianz.org.nz/new-zealanders-perceptions-of-asia-2026">New Zealanders&#8217; Perceptions of Asia 2026</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=China+and+Pacific+media">Other reports on China and media in the Pacific</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But there was some eyebrow raising about our collaboration over <em>China Daily’s</em> soft diplomacy role at the heart of Chinese media as part of its growing outreach into the Pacific along with the global Belt and Road development policy.</p>
<p>Linked to our Asia Pacific journalism studies course with support by the Asia NZ Foundation, these three-month internships provided a good insight into how Chinese media operated for New Zealand journalists graduating with an eye on an Asia-Pacific media future.</p>
<p>“Advanced studies in comparative journalism and media globalisation” and the “political economy” of the countries studied were <a href="https://paperdescriptorreport.aut.ac.nz/PaperDescriptor/PaperDescriptor?courseCode=JOUR801&amp;date=2024-11-15&amp;saveFormat=pdf">important parts of our course</a>.</p>
<p>A glimpse of how some media operate outside of the Western bubble.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Polishers&#8217; of reports</strong><br />
The journalistic role that the students faced while they were at the <em>China Daily</em> were initially of a subeditorial or copy-editing nature &#8212; they were called “polishers” of English-language reports. But as time when on, the opportunities grew, including reporting assignments, feature writing, <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/pmc-blog/rosie-tuck-reporting-live-china-daily-2120.html">and broadcasting</a>.</p>
<p>On exchange, we also <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/profile/song-jingli.html">hosted professional journalists</a> from the <em>China Daily</em> on our journalism papers. Overall the collaborative experience was positive. But the stakes are much higher now.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132569" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132569" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-132569" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide.png" alt="China Daily's home page today" width="680" height="483" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide-300x213.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide-100x70.png 100w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Home-680wide-591x420.png 591w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132569" class="wp-caption-text">China Daily&#8217;s home page today. Image: China Daily screenshot APT</figcaption></figure>
<p>The <em>China Daily</em> was founded as an English daily in 1981 and although it is owned and published by the Chinese Communist Party’s Publicity Department &#8212; the “Propaganda Department” &#8212; it is not an “official mouthpiece” of the CCP establishment.</p>
<p>In 2011, it <a href="https://pmcarchive.aut.ac.nz/pmc-blog/chinas-english-daily-newspaper-hits-30-years-1144.html">celebrated 30 years of publishing</a> during our collaboration.</p>
<p><em>China Daily</em> has usually enjoyed a more &#8220;liberal&#8221; face than most other Chinese state media.</p>
<p>For example, coverage of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre">1989 Tiananmen Square massacre</a> was generally sympathetic to the student protests and at least one account claims that some of its journalists <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Daily#cite_note-oxfordreference_China_Daily-18">joined in the demonstrations</a>. Also, the paper&#8217;s coverage of the <a href="https://www.onlinemeded.com/blog/the-first-big-wave-looking-back-at-the-2002-2004-sars-outbreak-and-the-lessons-we-learnt-ahead-of-covid-19">Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)</a> outbreak of 2002-2004 was more fact-driven and balanced than the &#8220;official&#8221; state media.</p>
<p><em>China Daily</em> has also published sponsored inserts in such global newspapers as <em>The New York Times</em> and <em>Wall Street Journal</em> in the US and <em>Le Figaro</em> in France.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132567" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132567" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-132567" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide.png" alt="The China Daily headquarters" width="680" height="483" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide-300x213.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide-100x70.png 100w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-HQ-CD-680wqide-591x420.png 591w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132567" class="wp-caption-text">The China Daily headquarters . . . a massive operation in Beijing&#8217;s in Chaoyang district. Image: China Daily/Wikipedia/Creative Commons</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Massive operation</strong><br />
Published out of a large headquarters in Chaoyang district, it is a massive operation by New Zealand standards, publishing the <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/static_e/printmedia.html">best part of a million copies daily</a>, two-thirds of the copies via special editions reaching at least 150 countries.</p>
<p>But the most visible face of the newspaper in New Zealand and the Pacific these days is online at the <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/"><em>China Daily</em> website</a>.</p>
<p><em>China Daily</em> has often <a href="https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202608/18/WS6a841aafa3106bc57421c21c.html">framed its Pacific outreach</a> through official editorials, youth forums and diplomatic rebuttals. It publicises green energy ties, criticises “foreign alarmism regarding regional expansion”, and argues that organisations such as the Pacific Islands Forum must back the one-China policy.</p>
<p>As the Chinese media outreach into the Pacific has been growing in recent years, the rivalry between Beijing, Washington and Canberra has been ratcheted up with accusations of “editorial interference and influence” in some countries, such as Kiribati and Solomon Islands, at least until the change of government in Honiara in May when Matthew Wale ousted the pro-China leadership in a general election.</p>
<p>In an in-depth report just two months before the election, the Paris-based media freedom watchdog <a href="https://rsf.org/en/china-s-growing-grip-solomon-islands-fragile-media-sector">Reporters Without Borders warned</a> that since Honiara had established diplomatic relations with China in 2019 the Pacific country had become a “strategic arena for Beijing’s influence”.</p>
<p>“By capitalising on the economic fragility of the local media sector, China has stepped up conditional funding, editorial partnerships and influence programmes to disseminate its narratives,&#8221; RSF said, calling on the Solomon Islands’ government to make the viability and independence of the media sector a priority.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132571" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132571" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132571 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26.png" alt="The China Daily opinion page" width="680" height="566" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26-300x250.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-Opinion-21-Aug-26-505x420.png 505w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132571" class="wp-caption-text">The China Daily opinion page . . . an invitation to contribute an op-ed. Image: China Daily screenshot APR</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Outreach invitation</strong><br />
The <em>China Daily</em> has stepped up its outreach initiatives in the Pacific lately as evidenced by an email to me four days ago inviting me to write an op-ed for the publication’s Opinion section. And the deadline is tomorrow.</p>
<p>Signed by an editor of the newspaper’s Opinion Department, the invitation said: “In early September, a high-level forum on media cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region will be held, bringing together senior media professionals and experts to discuss how the region’s media can better foster dialogue, trust and mutual understanding.</p>
<p>“We would be honoured to invite you to contribute an opinion article of around 800 words for publication in <em>China Daily</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The invitation continued:</p>
<figure id="attachment_132572" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132572" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132572 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-invitation-21-Aug-26.png" alt="The China Daily invitation" width="500" height="180" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-invitation-21-Aug-26.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/China-Daily-invitation-21-Aug-26-300x108.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132572" class="wp-caption-text">The China Daily invitation . . . deadline tomorrow. Image: Screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p><em>“As a reference, we have outlined several possible directions:</em><br />
<em>1. In the age of AI, how can Asia-Pacific media rebuild public trust?</em><br />
<em>2. From ‘reporting Asia’ to ‘telling Asia’s stories’: Can Asia-Pacific media move beyond Western narrative frameworks?</em><br />
<em>3. From “information competition” to media cooperation: How can Asia-Pacific media promote greater mutual understanding across the region?</em></p>
<p><em>These topics are only suggestions. We would be delighted if you chose to write on another angle that better reflects your current research or interests.</em></p>
<p><em>“Rather than opening with abstract concepts or institutional frameworks, we encourage authors to begin with something timely and tangible: a recent news event, a real-world development, or an everyday experience that readers immediately recognise.</em></p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Drawing in&#8217; readers</strong><em><br />
“Once readers are drawn in, the article can naturally expand to explain the broader policy, economic, technological or geopolitical forces behind it. In our experience, this narrative structure makes complex issues far more engaging for a broad international audience.</em></p>
<p><em>“The strongest pieces usually build around one central argument, moving from the concrete to the conceptual, from the familiar to the unfamiliar, and from today&#8217;s headline to its longer-term implications.</em></p>
<p><em>“We particularly value articles that combine the immediacy of current events with original analysis, clear storytelling and practical insights, rather than offering a comprehensive survey of every aspect of the topic.</em></p>
<p><em>“In addition to the written article, we would also be delighted if you could record a short video commentary of around one minute.</em></p>
<p><em>“A simple self-recorded video using a mobile phone would be perfectly fine. A vertical format with a clean and quiet background would be ideal; there is no need for professional filming or editing, as our team will handle the post-production.”</em></p>
<p>The invitation continued in the same vein.</p>
<p>Concluding, the email said: <em>“As our production schedule is quite tight, we would greatly appreciate it if you could send us both the article and the video by August 25, 2026.”</em></p>
<p>My reply? You are reading it right here on <em>Asia Pacific Report</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>An armed Jewish police force in Australia? Minns defies police and opens the door</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/23/an-armed-jewish-police-force-in-australia-minns-defies-police-and-opens-the-door/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 08:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed guards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed public power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Minns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Security Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favouritism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isaac Herzog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Board of Deputies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine protesters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private guards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The CSG is not legally police. Yet NSW Premier Chris Minns wants its armed guards patrolling public events despite senior police warning of favouritism and social fracture. One question exposes it all: would he ever permit an armed Muslim security force? Andrew Brown reports for Michael West Media. COMMENTARY: By Andrew Brown NSW Police examined ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The CSG is not legally police. Yet NSW Premier Chris Minns wants its armed guards patrolling public events despite senior police warning of favouritism and social fracture. One question exposes it all: would he ever permit an armed Muslim security force? Andrew Brown reports for <strong>Michael West Media</strong>.<br />
</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Andrew Brown</em></p>
<p>NSW Police examined the Community Security Group (CSG) proposal and warned the Premier it would fracture the state. Chris Minns is doing it anyway.</p>
<p>He is backing armed members of a private organisation formed to protect one community patrolling public events. He calls it a trial. In public, it would resemble an armed Jewish police force.</p>
<p>Apply one test. Imagine armed private guards, trained overseas on a foreign government’s money, patrolling Eid prayers at Lakemba. How many minutes does that proposal survive?</p>
<p>READ MORE:</p>
<p>It would be denounced as sectarian militia building and killed before lunch.</p>
<p><strong>Favouritism with a firearms licence<br />
</strong>And that rejection would be correct. A privilege unthinkable for any other community is not security policy. It is favouritism with a firearms licence, the state deciding whose fear earns guns and whose fear earns batons.</p>
<p>The GSG is not legally a police force and would not acquire general police powers. That, precisely, is the problem. Minns proposes putting armed private guards into public space without the command, accountability, discipline or universal duty owed by NSW Police.</p>
<p>CSG operates under the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, combining security professionals and volunteers to protect Jewish life, institutions and events. Its licensed guards already carry firearms at approved Jewish schools and synagogues.</p>
<p>Extending that into public gatherings crosses the line between guarding private premises and wielding armed power among the public.</p>
<p><strong>Pistol apartheid opposed by police<br />
</strong>NSW Police Deputy Commissioner David Hudson was unambiguous. Protecting every member of the community is the job of police. Granting one part of society exceptional armed privileges, he warned, would appear favouritism, fracture tenuous relationships and create friction between groups.</p>
<p>Police Association president Kevin Morton was even more blunt. Only NSW Police are charged with protecting the people of NSW. If one private organisation is allowed to arm in public, where does it stop?</p>
<blockquote><p>Minns’s answer is: wherever the lobby demands.</p></blockquote>
<p>Minns joined AIJAC’s inaugural Rambam Israel Fellowship in 2003, later celebrated as a “strong friend” by the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies. He entrenched Operation Shelter and rushed through protest restrictions later unanimously struck down by the Court of Appeal.</p>
<p>The double standard already played out on Sydney’s streets. Before peaceful protesters gathered to oppose Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Minns restricted protest, declared the visit a major event and mobilised more than 3000 police shifts, 500 at the demonstration.</p>
<p>His police kettled, punched, pepper sprayed and dragged protesters. They sprayed Muslims as they knelt in prayer.</p>
<blockquote><p>They broke a 69-year-old woman’s back in four places.</p></blockquote>
<p>Human Rights Watch found apparent excessive force. The LECC is investigating. <em>Michael West Media</em> understands civil claims are being prepared, with taxpayers facing potentially enormous damages.</p>
<p>The community whose worshippers his police pepper sprayed would never be handed its own armed guards. The community whose lobby cultivated the Premier for two decades is offered them.</p>
<p>That is not equal citizenship. It is a hierarchy, and Minns built it.</p>
<p><strong>What of proper process?<br />
</strong>A former Sydney CSG volunteer and Army officer lost his security clearance after a tribunal upheld ASIO’s assessment that he placed loyalty to Israel above Australia and was vulnerable to exploitation by Israeli intelligence.</p>
<p>His CSG training in Israel, financed by the Israeli government, involved tactical planning and firearms.</p>
<p>That case does not implicate every CSG member. It makes blind political trust grotesquely irresponsible. A competent government would examine the group’s governance, overseas training, intelligence links and command before expanding its armed reach. Minns asked for none of it.</p>
<p>Then the operational nightmare. Police responding to an attack could confront multiple armed private guards. Who commands them? How do police tell defenders from attackers in seconds?</p>
<p>Who answers when a bystander dies?</p>
<p>Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell questioned the fantasy that guns create safety.</p>
<blockquote><p>Australia rejected that fantasy after Port Arthur.</p></blockquote>
<p>NSW already has 250 armed response officers. If a Jewish event faces a credible armed threat, deploy them.</p>
<p>Jewish Australians deserve the full protection of the state, as every Australian does. What they do not need is a Premier handing them guns no other community would ever be allowed, and the isolation that comes with them.</p>
<p>Minns is not protecting equality. He is letting lobby power decide who may carry arms in public and who gets batons for praying.</p>
<p>This is political capture wearing a gun belt.</p>
<div data-profile-layout="layout-1" data-author-ref="user-2841" data-box-layout="slim" data-box-position="below" data-multiauthor="false" data-author-id="2841" data-author-type="user" data-author-archived="">
<div><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/andrew-brown/"><em> Andrew Brown</em></a><em> is a Sydney businessman in the health products sector, former Deputy Mayor of Mosman and Palestine peace activist.</em></div>
<div></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bondi Royal Commission: A &#8216;slippery slope to eroding our freedoms&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/22/bondi-royal-commission-a-slippery-slope-to-eroding-our-freedoms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIJAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antisemitism Envoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney-General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bondi Royal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepcut News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Centre for Law and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jillian Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael West Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mossad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Israel bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submissions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The “insidious fallout” of Australia&#8217;s Bondi Royal Commission is upon us. Before the Commission has even reported, the “slippery slope to eroding our freedoms has begun”, writes Jeffrey Loewenstein for Michael West Media. COMMENTARY: By Jeffrey Loewenstein As Australia&#8217;s Royal Commission into Antisemitism grinds through its 9th and final &#8220;Hearing Block&#8221;, one is now able ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The “insidious fallout” of Australia&#8217;s Bondi Royal Commission is upon us. Before the Commission has even reported, the “slippery slope to eroding our freedoms has begun”, writes Jeffrey Loewenstein for <a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/"><strong>Michael West Media</strong></a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Jeffrey Loewenstein</em></p>
<p>As Australia&#8217;s Royal Commission into Antisemitism grinds through its 9th and final &#8220;Hearing Block&#8221;, one is now able to make some assessments and judgments about the Commission, the Commissioner and the evidence presented to the Commission.</p>
<p>The Commission has being accused of being influenced by the usual suspects in the Jewish community and in turn the Executive Council of  Australia (ECAJ) has accused the Commission as having been</p>
<blockquote><p>“hijacked” by Palestinian/Arab community interests.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Royal Commissioner Virginia Bell was quick to stamp on that assertion.</p>
<p>While not being revealed here for the first time, there are certainly troubling aspects relating the Commission when one looks at the whole “picture”.</p>
<p>For starters, the firm of solicitors retained by the Commission to act as its lawyers are Gilbert+Tobin &#8212; the very firm selected by Federal Attorney-General Michelle Rowland (who, surprise, was a partner at the firm) without any open tenders being called.</p>
<p>The same firm acts for interests closely aligned with Israel such as the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC). The firm is even a sponsor of the organisation.</p>
<p>Then there is Mark Leibler, the chairman of the unelected AIJAC (Australia Israel Jewish Affairs Council) and senior partner of his firm Arnold Bloch Leibler. Leibler is impeccably connected to senior politicians, acts for many of them and is closely identified with Israel, including a close relationship with Mossad.</p>
<p>Enter the Royal Commission and the Commission through the Attorney-General’s Department inviting persons wanting to make submissions but seeking assistance from a lawyer to do so. Here the Department partnered with a previously unknown, murky, and new,</p>
<blockquote><p>pro-Zionist legal body to assist people in their submissions.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to <a href="https://www.deepcutnews.com/p/zionist-legal-body-chosen-to-solicit">Deepcut News,</a> the AG’s Department had “partnered with” this new pro-Israel group, the Jewish Centre for Law and Justice, to solicit submissions.</p>
<p><strong>The Segal agenda<br />
</strong>Finally, there is the Anti-Semitism Envoy, Jillian Segal, not only a one-time chair of lobby group ECAJ but also of the Australian-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC). It has been clear from the outset that her agenda has been to be promote the Israeli Zionist and Jewish narrative.</p>
<blockquote><p>She has made misleading assertions</p></blockquote>
<p>and submissions to the Royal Commission &#8212; such as that there were only some 9000 people who marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge in protest during the March for Humanity (independent estimates put the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Sydney_Harbour_Bridge_protest">figure at between 225,000 and 300,000</a> taking part), that those who did (like those in all other weekly marches around Australia for two and a half years) were antisemitic &#8212; and absurdly that anti-Semitism is “rampant” in Australia.</p>
<p>These were recurrent themes echoed by many of the witnesses selected, that the anti-genocide protest movement was antisemitic.</p>
<p><strong>The Bell challenge<br />
</strong>Enter the Royal Commissioner, Virginia Bell. It is not known to whom she spoke or what she might have read &#8212; one can make a good calculated guess &#8212; but without having heard a word of evidence or submissions from anyone, at  the outset of Day One of the public hearings, Bell announced that she would proceed on the basis of the IHRA definition even if it was in part contentious.</p>
<p>What makes this more than startling &#8212; coming from a lawyer and one-time High Court justice &#8212; is that there are serious critical criticisms of the IHRA, including from the lead draftsman of it who has publicly written that</p>
<blockquote><p>the definition has been “weaponised”.</p></blockquote>
<p>And that she has ignored the respected Jerusalem Declaration on Anti-Semitism (JDA). It is no criticism of the Royal Commissioner personally, but given she is not Jewish she has been prepared to either ignore, or disregard, the JDA &#8212; drafted by Jews no less! <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Declaration_on_Antisemitism">As noted in Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<p>“<em>The drafting of the declaration was initiated in June 2020 under the auspices of the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem by eight coordinators, most of whom were university professors. Upon its completion, the declaration was signed by about 200 scholars in various fields and released in March 2021.</em>”</p>
<p><strong>Evidence untested<br />
</strong>As the hearings have unfolded at least two things have been evident. There has been little or no cross-examination, or even gentle questioning, of witnesses. Whatever has been said &#8212; some of which has been absurd, such as the woman who testified that she felt “uncomfortable” seeing TV bulletins showing Gaza in the lift at her place of work &#8212; has simply been left out there.</p>
<p>Then, many important witnesses have been refused an appearance at the Commission. One example is the organiser of the Sydney Harbour Bridge March and many other marches.</p>
<p>As the Commissioner has been charged as part of the Commission to consider social cohesion, many who could speak to the subject have been refused attendance to give evidence, or simply not been called at the Commission.</p>
<p>The Australian public now awaits the Commissioner’s Report in December. However, in the real world outside the Commission, “interesting” things have occurred which, if nothing else,</p>
<blockquote><p>ought to give the Commissioner more than pause for thought.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Two court decisions counter Zionist narrative</strong><br />
In the case of <em>Wertheim v  Haddad [2025] FCA 720 (1 July 2025)</em> &#8212; a case brought in the Federal Court by two senior stalwarts of the ECAJ, Justice Stewart acknowledged (as conceded by the Applicants) that political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, was not by its nature criticism of Jewish people in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.</p>
<blockquote><p>Justice Stewart distinguished between legitimate political discourse and antisemitism,</p></blockquote>
<p>stating that, “The conclusion that it is not antisemitic to criticise Israel is the corollary of the conclusion that to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is antisemitic; the one flows from the other”.</p>
<p>Even more interesting is the recent decision by Justice Fagan in the NSW Supreme Court a few weeks ago. Fagan said the IHRA formulation did not reflect the established Australian meaning of antisemitism and described it as an attempt to “repurpose” the term to encompass both hatred of Jews and criticism of Israel.</p>
<p>Moreover, Fagan said the IHRA definition was</p>
<blockquote><p>“detached from the reality of common usage”.</p></blockquote>
<p>His Honour also said that “The … (IHRA) core text is so verbose and imprecise that it could not realistically be attributed to the ordinary, reasonably informed member of the Australian public.”</p>
<p>“Fagan was equally dismissive of the proposition that institutional adoption of the IHRA definition had altered the ordinary meaning of the word. He cited former NSW Supreme Court judge Sir Stephen Spedley, who had criticised the formulation because it</p>
<blockquote><p>“fails the first test of any definition: it is indefinite”.</p></blockquote>
<p>The fact that governments and several institutions had adopted the IHRA wording did not, Fagan said, “change the established meaning of a word that has been in use in the English language for 150 years”.</p>
<p>Instead, <a href="https://www.deepcutnews.com/p/nsw-supreme-court-criticises-ihra?utm_source=publication-search">he said</a>, the IHRA formulation “propounds a concept different from that which ‘antisemitism’ has long been understood to describe and appropriates that word to the novel concept”.</p>
<p><strong>Commissioner’s conundrum<br />
</strong>Commissioner Bell is now going to be met with a conundrum &#8212; determine what has been put before her at the Commission by the usual pro-Israel suspects, including Segal &#8212; who would label any criticism of Israel or Australian supporters of Israel as antisemitic and that IHRA was the appropriate “definition” of what constituted antisemitism &#8212; or accept what is being decided by judges confronted with evidence in the real world.</p>
<p>Finally, and insidiously, before the Commissioner has even issued her report, let alone any recommendations, we see the following having already occurred:</p>
<ol>
<li>Segal has been deploying her office, using taxpayer monies, together with Jewish organisations (Courage to Care being just one of them and backed and supported by the likes of the Gandel Foundation) &#8212; and also supported by government grants &#8212; out there in the guise of teaching what is antisemitism or guiding local councils around Australia into accepting that the IHRA is the way of determining what is antisemitic. Of concern is that these Jewish groups propounding this narrative are avowed and publicly pro-Israel Zionist organisations.</li>
<li>The Federal Education Minister has flagged that universities will be required to appropriately address antisemitism on campus on pain of being fined up to $2 million if found wanting in their efforts.</li>
</ol>
<p>Be aware! The slippery-slope to curbing our freedoms of expression has begun.</p>
<div data-profile-layout="layout-1" data-author-ref="user-2853" data-box-layout="slim" data-box-position="below" data-multiauthor="false" data-author-id="2853" data-author-type="user" data-author-archived="">
<div><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/jeffrey-loewenstein/"> Jeffrey Loewenstein</a> LL.B was a member of the Victorian Bar and a one-time chair of the Anti-Defamation Commission and member of the Jewish Community Council of Victoria. This article was first published by Michael West Media and is republished with permission.</em></div>
<div></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia, don&#8217;t be surprised. Israel does this to Palestinians all the time</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/21/australia-dont-be-surprised-israel-does-this-to-palestinians-all-the-time/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 23:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian public opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism of Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDF impunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lalzawmi “Zomi” Frankcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media perceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramallah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Central Kitchen]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Adla Alnazer The IDF&#8217;s decision not to open a criminal investigation into the deaths of seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including an Australian citizen, drew strong condemnation. But for Palestinians, this has simply become the norm. Four years ago, when I arrived from Palestine to study for my Master&#8217;s degree in ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Adla Alnazer</em></p>
<p>The IDF&#8217;s decision not to open a criminal investigation into the deaths of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Central_Kitchen_aid_convoy_attack">seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen</a>, including an Australian citizen, drew strong condemnation.</p>
<p>But for Palestinians, this has simply become the norm.</p>
<p>Four years ago, when I arrived from Palestine to study for my Master&#8217;s degree in Melbourne, Australia, I had a hard time finalising some paperwork related to government services, simply because I could not create an account. The problem was that my country, at the time, wasn&#8217;t listed within the governmental system.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/20/palestinian-theologian-warns-against-trusting-israel-over-hind-medics-killings-probe/"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Palestinian theologian warns against trusting Israel over Hind, medics killings probe</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/10/3/what-did-al-jazeeras-investigation-into-israeli-war-crimes-in-gaza-reveal">What did Al Jazeera’s investigation into Israeli war crimes in Gaza reveal?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/3/13/from-gaza-to-la-hopes-rise-as-the-voice-of-hind-rajab-heads-to-the-oscars">Who was Hind Rajab and why is Israel investigating her killing?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.knkx.org/2026-08-19/israeli-military-launches-criminal-probes-into-killings-of-5-year-old-and-paramedics">Israeli military launches criminal probes into killings of 5-year-old and paramedics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide">Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>There was no &#8220;Palestine&#8221; or &#8220;West Bank&#8221; and not even a slot for &#8220;Occupied Palestinian Territories&#8221;. At another interaction with local bureaucracy, the worker who received my passport commented that it was the first time he had seen a Palestinian one.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am sorry,&#8221; he said politely, &#8220;but I can&#8217;t even see it on the map.&#8221;</p>
<p>By the time we left Melbourne in 2024 and returned to our home in Ramallah, a lot had changed. For many months, hundreds of thousands of people gathered every Sunday in the city centre, raising Palestinian flags and calling to end Israel&#8217;s war in Gaza.</p>
<p>Watching these protests develop and gather steam, I came to realise that they were taking place not because Australia had become as &#8220;pro-Palestinian&#8221; as some of the media coverage had suggested, but rather because Israel&#8217;s image had badly deteriorated.</p>
<p><strong>Australian opinion shifted</strong><br />
In September of 2025, the shifts in Australian public opinion regarding Israel and the occupation found their way into the country&#8217;s official policies, when the government in Canberra recognised Palestine. Australia was one of several influential countries to do so in recent years.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132418" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132418" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132418 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide-.png" alt="Lalzawmi “Zomi” Frankcom" width="500" height="503" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide-.png 500w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide--298x300.png 298w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide--150x150.png 150w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lalzawmi-Zomi-Frankcom-WCK-500wide--417x420.png 417w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132418" class="wp-caption-text">Australian citizen Lalzawmi “Zomi” Frankcom . . . one of seven World Central Kitchen aid workers killed by the Israeli military in Gaza in 2024. Image: World Central Kitchen</figcaption></figure>
<p>One of the most influential turning points in Australian public views of Israel came in April 2024 when an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Central_Kitchen_aid_convoy_attack">Israeli airstrike on Deir al-Balah killed seven aid workers</a> from the humanitarian organisation World Central Kitchen, among them Zomi Frankcom, a 43-year-old woman from Melbourne.</p>
<p>For many Australians watching the horrors in Gaza from afar, that was the moment the war became personal.</p>
<p>This week, an internal inquiry by the Israeli military determined there was no criminal wrongdoing by any of the officers or soldiers involved in the fatal incident. Two years after the aid workers had been killed, Israel made clear it had no intention to punish anyone for their deaths, or even allow a proper independent investigation.</p>
<p>In Australia, this decision has been received with a mixture of anger and disappointment. The Australian Foreign Minister summoned the Israeli ambassador in protest.</p>
<p>I was following the headlines in Australia&#8217;s leading news websites from my home in Ramallah and realised how different my expectations as a Palestinian are from Israel, compared to those of many Australians. For me, there was nothing surprising about the Israeli military shielding soldiers from accountability.</p>
<p><em>Adla Alnazer is a public policy consultant and former adviser to the Palestinian government. This article was first published by Haaretz.<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeremy Rose: AI-generated good ‘news’ floods social media</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/18/jeremy-rose-why-ai-is-good-news-for-modern-man/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 06:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI slop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacinda Ardern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindness in power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positive stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substack]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: By Jeremy Rose A few months back, the story of the Victoria University of Wellington economist Dr Eleanor Vance and her 1978 paper &#8220;The Market Autocrat: Anticipating the Neoliberal Siege on Welfare States&#8221; was shared numerous times on my Facebook feed. Soon after, the heartwarming story of former prime minister Jacinda Ardern donating hundreds ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> <em>By Jeremy Rose</em></p>
<p>A few months back, the story of the Victoria University of Wellington economist Dr Eleanor Vance and her 1978 paper &#8220;The Market Autocrat: Anticipating the Neoliberal Siege on Welfare States&#8221; was shared numerous times on my Facebook feed.</p>
<p>Soon after, the heartwarming story of former prime minister Jacinda Ardern donating hundreds of thousands of dollars from speaking fees to building shelters for the homeless was all over social media.</p>
<p>And yesterday, I read about a meeting between the radical leftist former president of Uruguay, Pepe Mujica, and Princess Diana sharing their “deepest reflections on life”.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://youtu.be/uqcoTwPUSn4?si=s54y7dkCCtrHkN19"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Who&#8217;s behind the flood of AI slop online?</a> &#8212; <em>The Listening Post</em></li>
</ul>
<figure id="attachment_132289" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132289" style="width: 1332px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132289 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1332" height="1498" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide.jpg 1332w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-267x300.jpg 267w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-911x1024.jpg 911w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-768x864.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-696x783.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-1068x1201.jpg 1068w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR2-Kindness-in-power-1332wide-373x420.jpg 373w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1332px) 100vw, 1332px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132289" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p>The three stories have two things in common: they’re positive stories aimed squarely at political progressives, and they’re complete bullshit: AI slop.</p>
<p>Worryingly, they were shared on my social media feeds by a former board member of RNZ, a former foreign correspondent, a former journalism lecturer, and the editor of a professional trade magazine.</p>
<p>I’ve just read a tearjerker of a note here on Substack about Rachel Foster, a Vermont baker who took to delivering a blueberry muffin each Friday to a customer in a hospice. Gemini tells me it’s AI slop. (Yes, there’s an irony in the fact that by far the quickest way to identify AI slop is to ask an AI.)</p>
<p>That note has received more than 27,700 likes and 780 restacks.</p>
<p><strong>Confession time</strong><br />
And, confession time, a year or so ago, I might have shared a piece of viral AI slop when I first heard about Burkina Faso’s leader Captain Ibrahim Traore and his defiant anti-imperialism. I say might because there were some legitimate stories among the flood of AI-generated video and text stories that filled my social media feeds.</p>
<p>Rosa Cafferty, in her paper <a href="https://stand.ie/stand-newsroom/digital-divide-algorithm-breeding-ground-hate">A Digital Divide: A Breeding Ground for Hate</a>, explains how social media’s need for eyeballs for its advertisers has seen it using algorithms to cluster people into bubbles and echo chambers.</p>
<p>“Algorithms exploit vulnerabilities, prioritising sensational, emotional, and divisive content which thrives on outrage and extremity. As a result, posts evoking anger, outrage, and fear gain far more visibility than those promoting reflection or nuance.”</p>
<p>That’s undoubtedly true but something else is going on here. People are sharing heartwarming and inspiring stories “promoting reflection” and “nuance” &#8212; that are completely bogus. If nothing else, it reveals there’s a demand for stories that give people hope.</p>
<p>My Facebook feed is, like everyone else’s, populated by my “friends” &#8212; people who not surprisingly share many of my values and interests.</p>
<p>If I were, say, an anti-abortion supporter of one rule for all, corporal punishment, and a tough-on-crime approach, no doubt my “friends” and the algorithms would be dishing up an entirely different AI menu &#8212; different but still most likely a bogus one.</p>
<p>The business logic of algorithms driving division and anger, described by Cafferty, is the same logic that drives commercial media: maximising the number of eyeballs that can be fed paid adverts.</p>
<p><strong>Same thing with a twist</strong><br />
The same thing is at play here but with a twist. While Meta, X, and YouTube have traditionally platformed content created by the mainstream media, cannibalising their advertising base in the process, now Meta is paying creators to produce content. Content that doesn’t need to meet any standards of accuracy or truth.</p>
<p>The Jacinda Ardern slop was posted by a page called Kindness in Power. Until recently it was wall-to-wall AI-generated stories celebrating Ardern, many of which went viral. It currently has 5800 followers – including four I know, one of whom is a published writer.</p>
<p>Choosing Ardern with her massive following &#8212; both in Aotearoa and internationally &#8212; and her much smaller but highly motivated haters was a masterstroke. Glowing stories about Ardern are shared and commented on equally by those who love her and those who don’t and want to cry hypocrisy (and much worse).</p>
<p>Kindness in Power has &#8212; for some reason &#8212; pivoted from Ardern to stories about the All Blacks:</p>
<p><em>BREAKING: Former All Blacks Standout Identified as a Primary Suspect in Shocking S.ex.ual Ass.ault Investigation…</em></p>
<p><em>SHOCKING NEWS: The All Blacks have just announced that the team has parted ways with one of its veteran players…</em></p>
<p>There’s still the occasional political post but without the kindness:</p>
<p><em>BREAKING 30 MINS AGO: Chris Hipkins and Toni Grace have just delivered a massive bombshell announcement, sending shockwaves throughout New Zealand and leaving supporters…</em></p>
<p><strong>Not a winning plan</strong><br />
It’s not a winning game plan. That story about Jacinda Ardern and the homeless was shared and liked thousands of times; the All Black ones rarely get liked more than a handful of times.</p>
<p>“Shady” who shared the story about the kind-hearted Vermont baker ended the note by inviting readers to subscribe to “see more kindness stories like this”.</p>
<p>Does Shady know it’s a made-up story &#8212; probably. Should Shady know &#8212; definitely.</p>
<p>Another Shady post is lifted directly from Moonlight_myths on X, which describes itself as: Story sanctuary &#8212; Quote haven &#8212; bite-size novels and pure vibe.</p>
<p>Anyone on X looking at Moonlight_myths&#8217; bio is aware the story is fiction, while thousands of commenters on Substack believe it to be real.</p>
<p>Shady has 23,000 subscribers on Substack &#8212; some paying the US$6.50 a month &#8212; and tens of thousands of followers across other social media platforms.</p>
<p>There’s a link at the bottom of the President Mujica–Princess Di Facebook post that takes you to a page that explains it was an AI-generated “what if” story. (I doubt anyone who had clicked on that link would bother sharing the article. It makes a piss-poor fairy tale.)</p>
<p><strong>Request to Deepseek</strong><br />
I asked Deepseek &#8212; the Chinese AI that’s apparently slightly less environmentally disastrous than its US competitors &#8212; to write me a short story based on an imaginary meeting between the princess and the president. In less than five seconds this is some of what it spat out.</p>
<p><em>A princess trapped in a broken marriage arrived seeking help, but a former guerrilla fighter, living without luxuries, uttered a phrase that left her trembling: “Freedom costs, but slavery costs more.” Imagine a world where a British royal princess and a former Uruguayan guerrilla fighter shared their deepest reflections on life. It seems impossible, but it happened… At the presidential residence, José Mujica, then a senator, sipped mate in the garden while reviewing some documents. His hands, calloused from years of working the land, firmly held the traditional gourd.</em></p>
<p>Sure, there are giveaways for fans of Mujica: he never lived at the presidential residence, preferring a shack on his small farm. And the style has the ickiness of so much AI inspirational slop. And it plagiarised the other AI produced story.</p>
<p>But five seconds! Facebook creators can literally churn out hundreds of these stories an hour and Meta will pay them for it.</p>
<p>The <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-08-06/ragebait-how-facebook-is-paying-controversial-creators/106940696?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&amp;utm_content=twitter&amp;utm_medium=content_shared&amp;utm_source=abc_news_web">ABC investigation last week</a> revealed Meta is paying white nationalists with neo-Nazi links and an anti-vaxxer to create content.</p>
<p>Meta declined to comment but it seems the company is agnostic about whether its creators are peddling hate or spreading fake stories of hope &#8212; as long as they’re capturing eyeballs.</p>
<p>And AI are just as quick at churning out fake images. An author of books on heterodox economics &#8212; not someone you’d expect to be fooled easily &#8212; recently shared this photo of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni draped in the Palestinian flag.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132291" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132291" style="width: 1042px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132291 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1042" height="1510" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide.jpg 1042w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-207x300.jpg 207w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-707x1024.jpg 707w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-768x1113.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-696x1009.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR3-AI-Meloni-1042wide-290x420.jpg 290w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1042px) 100vw, 1042px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132291" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p>The image and others like it have gone viral. The world is desperate, it seems, for a woman leader of courage to call out the ongoing genocide in Gaza. Sadly, Meloni, a fan of Mussolini, isn’t that woman.</p>
<p>The Jewish president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, is a leader who has spoken out repeatedly against the genocide, but weirdly it’s barely reported.</p>
<p>It’s not only content creators wanting to make a quick buck using AI to generate images. A post in support of Martyn “Bomber” Bradbury recently included a photo of him smoking a pipe out of his cheek.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132293" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132293" style="width: 1340px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132293 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1340" height="1202" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide.jpg 1340w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-300x269.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-1024x919.jpg 1024w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-768x689.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-696x624.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-1068x958.jpg 1068w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR5-bomber-pipe-1340wide-468x420.jpg 468w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1340px) 100vw, 1340px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132293" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p>And a group opposing the building of AI data centres in New Zealand posted this obviously AI-generated image a week or so ago.</p>
<figure id="attachment_132294" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-132294" style="width: 1320px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-132294 size-full" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall.jpg" alt="Image: Social media feed screenshot" width="1320" height="1260" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall.jpg 1320w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-300x286.jpg 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-1024x977.jpg 1024w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-768x733.jpg 768w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-696x664.jpg 696w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-1068x1019.jpg 1068w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/JR4-AI-Data-1320tall-440x420.jpg 440w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1320px) 100vw, 1320px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-132294" class="wp-caption-text">Image: Social media feed screenshot</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Already passed the point?</strong><br />
Now it feels as if we’re still at a point where the sceptical can spot AI slop. But with AI developing at an incredible pace, who knows how long that will last and whether we’d know if we had already passed that point.</p>
<p><em>The New York Times</em> is reporting today that (gift link): “The digital sewage heap has sprawled across tech platforms, cheapening meaningful content and polluting the information ecosystem, as chatbots and video generators continue to advance.”</p>
<p>And it reports that across the internet, tech companies are undertaking a generative waste detox.</p>
<p>We can be sure that the detox is being undertaken for one reason and one reason only: the inundation of the internet with seemingly unlimited AI slop is bad for business. But it seems what’s bad for one business is good for another: Meta.</p>
<p>In the 1960s the American Bible Society published Good News for Modern Man in the hope of spreading the Christian message amongst the masses; today social media platforms are full of AI-generated fake good news stories (as well as stories of hate and pretty much any shit you can imagine) all driven by the state religion: capitalism.</p>
<p>It’s bad news for humanity, and one thing we can all do is stop sharing it and for everyone’s sake stop using it to produce second rate writing and even worse images.</p>
<p><em><a href="https://towardsdemocracy.substack.com/about">Jeremy Rose</a> is a Wellington-based journalist and an Asia Pacific Report contributor. His Substack is <a href="https://towardsdemocracy.substack.com/">Towards Democracy</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strait of Hormuz: It&#8217;s not just the numbers &#8211; it&#8217;s the ships&#8217; vote and that&#8217;s for Iran</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/15/strait-of-hormuz-its-not-just-the-numbers-its-the-ships-vote-and-thats-for-iran/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 06:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American warned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control of the strait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kpler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passage permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permit system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Persian Gulf Strait Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congressional Research Service]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Special Corespondent Maritime intelligence firm Kpler counted 13 vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday. The number is small. But the number is not the story. The story is that nine of those 13 took the Iranian-approved route. The route American warned ships against using. READ MORE: Trump says he will declare Hormuz US ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Special Corespondent</em></p>
<p>Maritime intelligence firm Kpler counted 13 vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday.</p>
<p>The number is small. But the number is not the story.</p>
<p>The story is that nine of those 13 took the Iranian-approved route. The route American warned ships against using.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/8/15/iran-war-live-trump-vows-to-make-hormuz-us-territory-pretty-soon"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Trump says he will declare Hormuz US territory ‘pretty soon’</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">Other war on Iran reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Now the question is: Trump says the strait is &#8220;under our control&#8221;. So whose instructions are the ships following?</p>
<p>The answer is in the arithmetic. Sixty-nine percent of them ignored the American warning and entered Iran&#8217;s lane.</p>
<p>That is not a statement. Not a claim. That is a vote.</p>
<p>And the vote was cast by people with hundreds of millions of dollars floating on that water.</p>
<p><strong>Plain language</strong><br />
CNN put it in plainer language. They wrote that the figure <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/14/world/live-news/iran-war-trump">does not reflect Trump&#8217;s repeated insistence</a> this week that the strait is &#8220;open&#8221; and under American control.</p>
<p>But today&#8217;s article will not only be about counting ships. Because Iran has done something on paper as well, and it has barely been discussed.</p>
<p>In May, Iran created an institution &#8212; the Persian Gulf Strait Authority.</p>
<p>According to a report by the US Congressional Research Service, <a href="https://www.marineinsight.com/iran-says-strait-of-hormuz-under-its-control-and-management-rejects-trumps-total-control-claim/">Iran declared that no vessel may pass through the Strait of Hormuz</a> without a valid passage permit issued by this authority.</p>
<p>Notice what that is. It is not a threat. It is administration.</p>
<p>A threat can stop a ship, but build a permit system and you never need to stop one. The ship comes to you and asks for permission.</p>
<p>And this is where Iran&#8217;s strategy becomes visible. Early in the war, Iran attacked vessels. That was a display of strength, but it carried a cost &#8212; every attack drained away the world&#8217;s sympathy.</p>
<p><strong>A legal face</strong><br />
Now Iran attacks less and sells permits instead. Same result, but the face of it is legal.</p>
<p>There is one more line in the CRS report, and it is the foundation of this strategy. Iranian leaders claim it was the June memorandum of understanding that granted them the right to administer shipping through this strait.</p>
<p>Which is Iran saying:&#8221;We did not seize this power. You signed it over to us on paper.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what Iran&#8217;s <a href="https://thefederal.com/category/international/us-iran-war-mou-strait-of-hormuz-247701">Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf said on June 23</a> is now coming true. He said &#8220;management of the strait will never return to the way it was before the war&#8221;.</p>
<p>But, yes, there is a big &#8220;but&#8221; here. And it would be unjust not to say it.</p>
<p>That same CRS report notes that Iran&#8217;s claim runs counter to geographic reality, because the Strait of Hormuz comprises the territorial waters of <em>both</em> Iran and Oman.</p>
<p>Which means Iran is not legally the sole owner of this strait. On paper, Iran&#8217;s claim is weak.</p>
<p><strong>Iran&#8217;s lane followed</strong><br />
But paper and water are not the same thing. Whatever the law says, on Thursday nine ships followed Iran&#8217;s lane.</p>
<p>Now to America&#8217;s answer.</p>
<p>On Friday, the US Treasury issued new sanctions. The targets were Iran&#8217;s Shahr Bank, along with individuals, exchange houses and companies spread across several countries, accused of helping Iran move hundreds of millions of dollars clandestinely.</p>
<p>The Treasury said itself that this was its eighth set of sanctions in 2026 against Iran&#8217;s alleged shadow-banking system.</p>
<p>Eighth. Eight times in one year.</p>
<p>Now the question is: if seven did not work, why would the eighth?</p>
<p>That is the problem with sanctions. The first one lands a blow. The second raises the pressure. But what does the eighth do?</p>
<p>The eighth only announces that the previous seven did not work.</p>
<p><strong>The new normal</strong><br />
And the strangest thing of all is the oil price. CNN reported that despite no sign of the war ending, and despite traffic through the strait staying low, oil prices are falling.</p>
<p>So you can see for yourselves. The market is no longer listening to war news. The market has decided this is the new normal.</p>
<p>And once something becomes &#8220;normal&#8221;, the urgency to change it fades.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, on Thursday evening, Abu Dhabi&#8217;s state oil company ADNOC said two of its vessels were attacked while transiting Hormuz. No injuries.</p>
<p>Who attacked them? ADNOC did not say. No group claimed responsibility.</p>
<p>Since the war began, 15 ADNOC vessels have been attacked in total. One crew member killed, 20 injured.</p>
<p>The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is an American ally. And the ally&#8217;s ships are burning every week.</p>
<p>Now a word on something that touches South Asian countries too.</p>
<p><strong>Floating Iranian oil</strong><br />
Early in this war, America adopted a tactic &#8212; temporarily lifting sanctions on roughly 140 million barrels of Iranian oil already floating at sea, so that supply would rise and prices would fall.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s Ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, told Fox News at the time that <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/waltz-says-trump-using-irans-own-oil-strategy-against-drive-down-global-prices">this oil had previously gone mainly to China</a>. Now it could go elsewhere. He named the places &#8212; such as India, Bangladesh or elsewhere</p>
<p>He added that sanctions on the banks would remain in place, so Iran would not see a cent of that money.</p>
<p>Think about what that means. Iran&#8217;s oil gets sold, South Asian countries get to buy it, and Iran does not get the money.</p>
<p>Developing countries are offered cheap oil as bait while Iran&#8217;s own asset is released onto the market, and the proceeds stay locked inside the American banking system.</p>
<p>That is not trade. That is imperial accounting.</p>
<p>Here I will not quote anyone else. I will give you my own opinion.</p>
<p><strong>Paper &#8216;control&#8217; v ships moving</strong><br />
The shape of this war is becoming clear now. Everything Trump is doing is on paper. Sanctions, Truth Social posts, declarations of &#8220;total control&#8221;.</p>
<p>Everything Iran is doing is on the water. Which route, whose permission, which ship and when.</p>
<p>In March, Trump called on China, France, Japan, South Korea and Britain to send ships, &#8220;let us open the strait together&#8221;. Nobody answered.</p>
<p>Five months on, America has drawn a route through that same strait, and the ships are avoiding it and choosing Iran&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Control written on paper, or ships moving on water &#8212; which of the two is real power?</p>
<p>Let me finish with the number I started with.</p>
<p>Thirteen ships. Nine on Iran&#8217;s route.</p>
<p>Trump says the strait is ours. The ships&#8217; captains are saying something else.</p>
<p>And at sea, the captain has the last word.</p>
<p><em>Republished from Iran International under Creative Commons.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre turns 42 &#8211; reflections on a milestone</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/13/fiji-womens-crisis-centre-turns-42-reflections-on-a-milestone/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 11:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiji Women's Crisis Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQIA+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shamima Ali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=132030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre Today, we mark an extraordinary milestone: 42 years of the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre (FWCC). As we reflect on this journey, we are reminded of the countless lives that have intersected with our work since 1984. Over the past four decades, 168,145 survivors have accessed the services of FWCC and its ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre</em></p>
<p>Today, we mark an extraordinary milestone: 42 years of the <a href="https://www.fijiwomen.com/">Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre</a> (FWCC).</p>
<p>As we reflect on this journey, we are reminded of the countless lives that have intersected with our work since 1984. Over the past four decades, 168,145 survivors have accessed the services of FWCC and its branches throughout Fiji.</p>
<p>These include survivors of domestic violence, rape and sexual assault, sexual harassment, child abuse, and other forms of violence and abuse.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Fiji+Women%27s+Crisis+Centre"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other Fiji Women&#8217;s Crisis Centre reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Yet numbers alone can never tell the full story.</p>
<p>Statistics cannot capture the fear of a woman escaping violence in the middle of the night. They cannot describe the courage it takes to disclose rape for the first time.</p>
<p>They cannot measure the resilience of survivors who rebuild their lives after trauma, nor reflect the determination of women who refused to give up despite experiencing violence, discrimination, and inequality.</p>
<p>Every individual who walked through our doors came seeking safety, support, and dignity. Many arrived carrying experiences that no one should ever have to endure. Many came believing they were alone. Our role was, and continues to be, to ensure they know they are not.</p>
<p><strong>Principles of feminism</strong><br />
Throughout our history, FWCC’s work has remained firmly grounded in the principles of feminism, women’s human rights, human rights, dignity, equality, and justice. These principles have guided our response to violence against women and girls, shaped our advocacy, informed our research and training, and strengthened our commitment to building a society where all women and girls can live free from violence, discrimination, and inequality.</p>
<p>While our primary focus has been addressing violence against women and girls, our services have always recognised the diversity of the communities we serve. Over the past 42 years, we have worked with women in all their diversity, including women from rural and urban communities, women with disabilities, young women, older women, women from different ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, and women of different sexual orientations and gender identities.</p>
<p>We have also supported men and boys affected by violence and abuse, as well as members of the LGBTQI+ community who have sought counselling, support, information, and protection.</p>
<p>Looking back, the impact of FWCC extends far beyond the people who directly accessed our services. It can be seen in the women who found safety and rebuilt their lives. It can be seen in the police officers, health workers, teachers, community leaders, faith leaders, and advocates who received training and developed a deeper understanding of violence against women and women’s human rights.</p>
<p>It is reflected in laws, policies, and public conversations that have been influenced by decades of advocacy, research, and evidence-based work. It is reflected in generations of women and girls who now know that they have rights, that violence is never their fault, and that support is available.</p>
<p><strong>Centre&#8217;s leadership</strong><br />
No reflection on the journey of the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre would be complete without acknowledging the leadership of our coordinator, Shamima Ali. For more than four decades, she has been the most influential voice for women’s human rights in Fiji and the Pacific. Her unwavering commitment to ending violence against women and girls, advancing gender equality, and holding institutions accountable has helped shape not only the direction of FWCC but also the national conversation on women’s rights and human rights.</p>
<p>Under her leadership, FWCC has grown from a small feminist organisation into a nationally and internationally respected centre for crisis intervention, advocacy, research, training, and feminist leadership. Through times of political uncertainty, social resistance, and changing public attitudes, she has remained steadfast in speaking out against injustice and ensuring that survivors’ voices and experiences remain at the centre of our work.</p>
<p>Some people witness history and others help shape it. Shamima Ali has done both. Thank you, Sham.</p>
<p>We also acknowledge with gratitude the staff, counsellors, trainers, volunteers, trustees, supporters, allies, donors, partners, and communities who have stood with us over the last four decades. Your dedication, commitment, and belief in this work have made these achievements possible.</p>
<p>We also extend our sincere appreciation to the Australian government through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), and the New Zealand government through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT), for their longstanding partnership and support. Their contributions have strengthened efforts to advance women’s human rights and respond to violence against women and girls in Fiji and across the Pacific.</p>
<p>As we reflect on 42 years, we are also mindful of those whose experiences remain unseen and unheard. Their stories remind us that violence against women remains one of the most urgent human rights challenges facing our nation.</p>
<p>That is why our work remains as important today as it was in 1984.</p>
<p>We do not mark anniversaries simply to celebrate longevity. We mark them to honour feminist persistence and resilience.</p>
<p>Our dream has always been to work ourselves out of business. Until that day comes, the work continues.</p>
<p><em>Republished from the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre website, 13 August 2026.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain’s Big Brother state is already here – we just don’t realise it yet</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/11/britains-big-brother-state-is-already-here-we-just-dont-realise-it-yet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 06:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-protest laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authoritarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaire media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billionaires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debanking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocaust scholars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human rights groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli atrocities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Corbyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupied Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US war crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While the public is encouraged to blame immigrants, Muslims, the left, or &#8220;Israel haters&#8221;, the UK state is racing to erect a scaffolding of control to protect itself before we wake up to the deception, writes Jonathan Cook. ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook When is it possible to declare that a society has moved from liberal ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>While the public is encouraged to blame immigrants, Muslims, the left, or &#8220;Israel haters&#8221;, the UK state is racing to erect a scaffolding of control to protect itself before we wake up to the deception</em><strong>, </strong><em>writes <strong>Jonathan Cook</strong>.</em></p>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:</strong> <em>By Jonathan Cook</em></p>
<p>When is it possible to declare that a society has moved from liberal democracy, however imperfectly realised, to authoritarian rule?</p>
<p>Is there a moment when it is suddenly obvious the change has occurred? Does authoritarianism announce its arrival?</p>
<p>Or is it a process that gradually unfolds, where restraints on executive power are dismantled piece by piece until the tide cannot be reversed?</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Jonathan+Cook"><strong>READ MORE: </strong>Other Jonathan Cook articles</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Gaza+genocide">Other Gaza genocide reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Is the turn to authoritarianism something that can only be understood after the event, when all opportunities to halt the slide have been missed?</p>
<p>And how do we admit to ourselves that we have been stripped of our most basic and cherished freedoms &#8212; of speech, assembly and protest &#8212; when we are no longer free to speak, meet or protest?</p>
<p>The unpalatable truth is that Britain is already far down this path. And if you are unaware of the earthquake that has been taking place, that may be because &#8212; just as you might expect when authoritarianism comes calling &#8212; the very first to be smothered are the voices sounding the alarm.</p>
<p>A media owned by billionaires and the state &#8212; the parties that, in an age of growing popular discontent, have most to gain from the accretion of executive power and the silencing of dissent &#8212; have no reason to illuminate the encroaching darkness.</p>
<p><strong>Foot work for authoritarianism</strong><br />
An ostensible Labour government under the outgoing Keir Starmer has done much of the foot work to usher in the new, ominous political climate.</p>
<p>It was precisely Starmer’s credentials as a human rights lawyer that provided the British state with the cover story it needed for an unprecedented assault on the freedoms fought for by earlier generations.</p>
<p>There are few signs that his successors, whether it be a new figurehead in the genocide-supporting Labour Party or Nigel Farage’s immigrant-bashing Reform, will change direction.</p>
<p>The logic driving Britain’s slide towards authoritarianism is being set not just by politicians, but by a British establishment that needs to sell its collusion in genocide and illegal wars abroad and to find easy scapegoats &#8212; immigrants &#8212; to blame for its failures at home.</p>
<p>The job of the main political parties, reliant on billionaire donors who also own the corporate media, is to shore up these narratives.</p>
<p>It was Starmer’s Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, who incautiously gave the clearest expression to the British state’s vision of our future.</p>
<p>In a speech in January she laid out her ambition to harness new developments in AI to create an all-powerful, all-seeing “Big Brother” surveillance state of the kind foretold by George Orwell in his dystopian novel <em>1984</em>.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Panopticon&#8217;, the perfect prison</strong><br />
Mahmood even compared this future to the “panopticon” &#8212; a reference to 18th-century philosopher Jeremy Bentham’s perfect prison: a central watchtower (the state) surrounded by a circle of windowed cells where the inmates (the public) would be visible at all times.</p>
<p>Bentham understood that this was not just about physical control. As he observed, the sense of being constantly observed would be a “new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind”. The inmates would police their own behaviour to avoid punishment.</p>
<p>Starmer’s successor, Andy Burnham, is reportedly keen to keep Mahmood a key figure in his government. But this isn’t about a single government minister.</p>
<p>Mahmood is the symptom of a deeper malaise, not its cause. The architecture of the new systems of control, as well as the erosion of freedoms and the cultural traditions that supported them, were already well advanced when she was appointed to the Home Office.</p>
<p>Whoever holds the reins of power in the months and years to come will be able to exploit these existing powers to the maximum, and then extend them further.</p>
<p>Once the spirit of authoritarianism takes hold, it becomes ever harder to stuff it back into the box. Only concerted mass protest can remind the state where ultimate power resides. And it is precisely this kind of protest that is being demonised and criminalised one step at a time.</p>
<p>If it is possible to identify a single moment when the new authoritarianism moved out of the shadows, it was some 15 years ago. That was the moment the state launched its protracted campaign against Julian Assange to vilify and incarcerate him.</p>
<p><strong>Incensed US over war crimes</strong><br />
The founder of the whistleblowing platform WikiLeaks had incensed the United States and its loyal British sidekick by publishing details of war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq both wanted to be kept secret.</p>
<p>It was probably no coincidence that, at the time, Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service and making repeated trips to meet Washington’s most senior law officers. Contrary to protocols, records of these discussions were destroyed by his officials.</p>
<p>We will never know what instructions Starmer was given by the US regarding Assange. But a possible clue survived the further, and highly irregular, destruction by Starmer’s department of related correspondence between UK and Swedish prosecutors from that time.</p>
<p>One of the few surviving emails is revealing. It shows that Sweden was considering dropping an investigation into Assange for lack of evidence, as he was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London fearful of what lay in store.</p>
<p>Starmer’s staff, who were supposed to be neutral arbiters between Sweden and Assange’s legal team, angrily told the Swedes: “Don’t you dare get cold feet!!!”</p>
<p>In another email, the same CPS official told Swedish counterparts: “Please do not think this case is being dealt with as just another extradition.&#8221;</p>
<p>Later, with the active connivance of the UK and its courts, the US showed its true hand. Washington began extradition proceedings on the preposterous grounds that Assange had committed “espionage” by publishing details of its war crimes.</p>
<p><strong>Caged in prison</strong><br />
Assange was caged in a high-security prison in London for years, often unable to meet his lawyers, his health failing, on a trumped-up, nakedly political charge.</p>
<p>This was a terrifying, unprecedented assault on the right of journalists to publish evidence of state wrongdoing in the public interest. And yet the billionaire-owned media could barely stifle their yawns.</p>
<p>There was a two-fold gain from Assange’s decade-long abuse and the trampling of his legal rights.</p>
<p>First, it established a very visible precedent in which the rule of law was turned on its head. The roles of victim and victimiser were reversed.</p>
<p>Assange, who had published incontrovertible evidence of US and British war crimes, was the one behind bars. British officials who approved and hid those crimes not only evaded justice but were free to hound and smear Assange.</p>
<p>This has been the theme ever since, as the British state has intensified its curbs on speech and protest, with Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians often serving as the testing ground for authorising this new crackdown.</p>
<p>In the second half of the 2010s, Jeremy Corbyn &#8212; Starmer’s predecessor as Labour leader &#8212; found himself and his supporters roundly vilified as “antisemites”.</p>
<p><strong>Forewarning of the future</strong><br />
Why? Because they tried to bring attention to Israel’s criminal actions &#8212; a forewarning of what was to come, as Israel unleashed what legal experts, Holocaust scholars, human rights groups and United Nations investigators have all concluded is a genocide in Gaza.</p>
<p>In a properly functioning democracy, those who smeared Corbyn and other critics of Israel would have been permanently discredited.</p>
<p>Instead, UK officials &#8212; the same officials colluding in Israel’s current crimes by shipping arms to Israel, by carrying out surveillance flights to guide Israel’s bombing campaigns against Gaza’s civilians, and by offering diplomatic cover &#8212; simply stepped up the demonisation campaign.</p>
<p>As millions of Britons took to the streets, the Starmer government &#8212; and the British state behind it &#8212; not only labelled them as antisemites but radically rewrote the statute books to criminalise opposition to Israel’s genocide.</p>
<p>Direct action group Palestine Action, which had been targeting Israeli arms factories operating on UK soil, was proscribed as a “terrorist” group equivalent to al-Qaeda and Islamic State.</p>
<p>Holding placards protesting the genocide, as thousands of respectable British citizens did, became “support for terrorism”, risking a jail term of up to 14 years.</p>
<p>Reality was once again inverted.</p>
<p><strong>UK supports state terrorism</strong><br />
Britain continues to actively support Israeli state terrorism.</p>
<p>But it was those ringing the alarm &#8212; those trying to stop these shipments, those opposed to British collusion in Israeli state terrorism, or those simply appalled by the undermining of basic rights to protest &#8212; who were arrested and charged as &#8220;terrorists&#8221;.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, documents show Elbit Systems continues to enjoy unrestricted access to British government officials.</p>
<p>Second, in stigmatising and isolating Assange for publishing details of US and UK war crimes, the British state was able to draw its own fake distinction between “good” and “bad” journalism &#8212; a distinction the billionaire-owned media was only too happy to embrace.</p>
<p>Assange, whose independent platform WikiLeaks had held Washington and London’s feet to the fire for committing war crimes, had in the process shamed the establishment media for their unwillingness to do likewise.</p>
<p>He exposed the extent to which corporate journalists, dependent on access to the rich and powerful for stories, conspire in the covert, unaccountable ways power is exercised by the state.</p>
<p>The media are not watchdogs; they are lap dogs, representing the interests of the billionaire class.</p>
<p><strong>Independent media not tolerated</strong><br />
The British state &#8212; and its security services &#8212; made clear they would not tolerate truly independent or critical media that could expose their hypocrisies or bring them to book.</p>
<p>In response, the billionaire-owned media not only hung Assange out to dry. It joined the government in a chorus of claims that independent outlets were either peddling “fake news” or serving as “Kremlin assets” spreading “disinformation“.</p>
<p>It amplified the pressure from politicians on social media platforms, the billionaires’ new plaything, to tighten their algorithms to hide independent journalists, and stymie these dangerous new competitors in the battle for truth.</p>
<p>Similarly, corporate media cheerled the government’s decision to ban <em>Russia Today</em>, the Russian state’s news channel. It quickly became all but impossible for UK audiences to hear Russia’s version of events in the mainstream media, as Britain and European states built the case for permanent confrontation with Moscow.</p>
<p>The European Union imposed an even more draconian ban &#8212; upheld last month by the EU’s Court of Justice &#8212; that makes it a criminal offence to repeat any information reported by <em>RT</em>, and other banned outlets, even if demonstrably true. The law’s purpose is to supposedly “protect public order and safety”.</p>
<p>In recent weeks, two prominent US commentators, Cenk Uygur and Hasan Piker, have been denied entry to the UK over their criticisms of Israel. Uygur was due to speak at an Oxford University debate.</p>
<p>In this new authoritarian climate, truth is defined as whatever the state wants their citizens to know. Meanwhile, disinformation &#8212; “Russian propaganda” or “antisemitism” &#8212; is whatever those same states insist their citizenry must not hear.</p>
<p><strong>Brazen reversal of Enlightenment</strong><br />
This is a brazen reversal of 350 years of the Western Enlightenment, with its professed belief both in the primacy of reason and that ideas must be tested through debate and critical scrutiny.</p>
<p>Now it matters not what is being said, but only who is saying it.</p>
<p>And unsurprisingly, the billionaire-owned, Western media has endorsed this new regime. After all, its voice &#8212; representing the interests of the super-rich &#8212; is guaranteed a hearing.</p>
<p>No surprise, then, that this same privileged media corps has continued to meekly accept its exclusion from Gaza by Israel as the biggest crime in modern history unfolds &#8212; even now, in the midst of a supposed ceasefire that Israel keeps breaking.</p>
<p>Because what matters is who is allowed to speak: Israel, not Gaza’s Palestinians, whether what Israel says is true or, as invariably turns out to be the case, a lie.</p>
<p>In line with this precept, the billionaire-owned media has barely raised a murmur as Israel has slaughtered Gaza’s journalists in unprecedented numbers &#8212; killing more of them than in two world wars, Vietnam, the Yugoslav wars and Afghanistan combined.</p>
<p>The lives of Palestinian journalists &#8212; like the reporting they have had to do alone under Israeli bombardment &#8212; count for nothing in the Western media because of who they are.</p>
<p><strong>Genocide &#8216;erased as a crime&#8217;</strong><br />
Genocide &#8212; the what &#8212; has been erased as a crime because it is we &#8212; the West &#8212; who are helping to carry it out.</p>
<p>The Committee to Protect Journalists, reportedly facing a political and donor backlash, scrapped last year its annual Global Impunity Index &#8212; which measured where journalists are murdered with impunity &#8212; after it became clear Israel would top the rankings.</p>
<p>Now the same committee is being accused of caving in to these pressures by raising doubts about who counts as a journalist in Gaza &#8212; doubts that will serve to embolden Israel, which claims that Palestinian journalists, indeed all Palestinians, are terrorists in disguise.</p>
<p>The who has to be rewritten because the what cannot be denied.</p>
<p>The same story is unfolding in the UK, where independent British journalists have been detained at the airport or had their homes raided at dawn by counterterrorism police for “wrong-think” about the Gaza genocide and British complicity in it. They too face up to 14 years in jail.</p>
<p>That has sent a chilling message to other journalists, those that lack the protection of a billionaire patron or the state, about what can be said.</p>
<p>None of this is, or will be, confined to Gaza. The upending of Enlightenment values, as should be clear by now, is part of a much bigger political project to normalise and entrench this creeping authoritarianism.</p>
<p><strong>Hard to reverse precedent</strong><br />
The proscription of Palestine Action and placard-holding has paved the way for the British state to designate any opponent &#8212; challenging its lawbreaking or contesting its right to dictate truth &#8212; as a criminal or a supporter of terrorism. A precedent has been set, and now approved by the UK courts, that will be hard to reverse.</p>
<p>The state has many tools at its disposal, some of which it is already wielding, again to no protest from billionaire-owned media “watchdogs”.</p>
<p>A particularly powerful one is “debanking”: forcing individuals or groups who disrupt the narrative of Western state moral and legal authority out of the financial system, driving them into a kind of purdah that makes it near-impossible for them to function in the modern, Western world.</p>
<p>Notably again, Assange and WikiLeaks were an early victim of the use of debanking as a political weapon. Washington imposed sanctions in late 2010, shortly after WikiLeaks exposed US and British war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, cutting off almost all of its donor revenue.</p>
<p>Sanctions &#8212; what some describe as a “financial death penalty” &#8212; have already been imposed on several judges and staff of the International Criminal Court over the issuing of an arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for committing crimes against humanity in Gaza.</p>
<p>UN legal expert Francesca Albanese, at the forefront of highlighting Western complicity in Israel’s genocide, has also been debanked.</p>
<p>In Britain, Palestinian and Islamic-run charities have long faced harsh restrictions on their ability to operate financially, usually on the basis of claims that they may be funnelling donations to proscribed groups.</p>
<p>But this has gradually expanded to mainstream Palestine solidarity organisations and to individuals caught up in the ban on Palestine Action.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Canary</em> debanked</strong><br />
In an even more disturbing, if predictable, development, Lloyds Bank has now debanked <em>The</em> <em>Canary</em>, a leftwing publication whose criticisms of Labour’s capture by Big Business have long proved a thorn in the party bureacracy’s side. <em>The Canary</em> can no longer pay staff, and its news operation is in jeopardy.</p>
<p>This is the same <em>Canary</em> that the Labour Together project led by Morgan McSweeney &#8212; who propelled Starmer to power on behalf of the billionaire-friendly, pro-genocide Labour right &#8212; identified early on as a threat. His mantra was reportedly: “Destroy <em>The Canary</em> or <em>The Canary</em> destroys us.”</p>
<p>As investigative journalist Paul Holden sets out in his book <em>The Fraud,</em> which documents Labour Together’s covert, law-breaking operations, McSweeney almost succeeded in destroying <em>The Canary</em>. He created an astroturf group, Stop Funding Fake News, that lobbied advertisers to boycott the publication.</p>
<p>Labour Together under McSweeney’s successor, Josh Simons, would then launch a smear campaign on Holden and refer him to British security services as a supposed Kremlin asset.</p>
<p>Like a bad penny, Simons has turned up again, this time giving up his Makerfield seat for Andy Burnham to return to Westminster. Simons is now one of Burnham’s political advisers.</p>
<p>This systematic assault on the right to scrutinise the British state’s actions has been extended to the legal profession too.</p>
<p>Last month, Dan Kovalik, a respected US human rights lawyer and professor, was detained at Liverpool airport by counterterrorism police and questioned over his criticisms of Western foreign policy in Gaza and Iran.</p>
<p><strong>Detained by police</strong><br />
Fahad Ansari, a British human rights lawyer, was detained by police last year on return to the UK from a family holiday in Ireland under Schedule 7 of the draconian Terrorism Act of 2000.</p>
<p>Both men had their electronic devices seized, despite protests that this was unlawful and violated their privileged lawyer-client communications.</p>
<p>Ansari’s detention appears to be a blatant act of political retaliation and intimidation. He had made legal representations challenging a Home Office decision in 2021 to expand the proscription of Hamas to its political wing. Hamas has never launched a military operation in Britain.</p>
<p>For the submission, Ansari had assembled a group of experts to argue that the expanded proscription &#8212; long desired by Israel &#8212; was having a profoundly chilling effect on the work of lawyers, scholars, human rights groups and journalists in documenting and discussing Israeli crimes in Gaza.</p>
<p>Five UN legal experts wrote protesting the abuse of Ansari’s rights as a lawyer, warning that “such measures threaten to criminalise, stigmatise and have chilling effects against lawyers and legal associations carrying out lawful work in national security and counter-terrorism matters”.</p>
<p>That seems to be precisely the point. Harassing lawyers is a feature, not a bug, of Britain’s new authoritarianism.</p>
<p>An even more visible victim of this new assault on the legal profession is the highly respected barrister Rajiv Menon.</p>
<p><strong>Key human rights cases</strong><br />
He has worked on some of the most important human rights cases of modern times, challenging failures and abuses of power by the state in relation to the murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence, the deaths of nearly 100 Liverpool football fans at Hillsborough, and the 72 victims of the Grenfell Tower fire.</p>
<p>He is currently facing contempt of court proceedings after making a closing speech in January that persuaded a jury not to convict six Palestine Action defendants of any of the charges brought by the British state against them. In 2024, the six had targeted an Elbit factory.</p>
<p>It is believed to be the first time that a lawyer has been prosecuted for contempt of court over a closing speech. Garden Court Chambers, where Menon has practised for three decades, said the proceedings had sent “shock waves through the legal profession”.</p>
<p>It warned of a severe chilling effect on barristers, who might be more reluctant to mount a strong defence, especially in politically charged trials, for fear of reprisals.</p>
<p>All of this should be seen in the context of the government’s equally unprecedented moves to erode the cornerstone legal principle of the right to trial by jury.</p>
<p>Authoritarian states permit no meaningful restraints on their ability to impose their will. Independent-minded lawyers and juries are just such a brake.</p>
<p>But perhaps the most sustained assault by the British state has been on the rights to protest and assembly, making it increasingly dangerous to express a view in the public space.</p>
<p><strong>2 million in street power</strong><br />
Since some two million people took to the streets to oppose Britain’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, new ways have been sought to restrict the ability of ordinary citizens to raise their voice against the abuse of governmental and state power.</p>
<p>Recent legislation allows police to ban protests because they are “too noisy” or cause “serious unease”. Disruption has been redefined to now include hindrance to any daily activity. Protests can be barred if they have a “cumulative” impact.</p>
<p>These are all inherent features of protest. The mass demonstrations against Britain’s illegal attack on Iraq were noisy, disruptive and repeated &#8212; as have been the marches against Britain’s collusion in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.</p>
<p>By judging the legality of protest according to these selective and largely subjective criteria, the state has given the police huge latitude to decide which protests should be criminalised and which allowed. It is hardly surprising then that the police are currently concentrating their efforts on the anti-genocide marches, which highlight British collusion in Israel’s crimes.</p>
<p>Facial recogition technology &#8212; pioneered by Israel against Palestinians &#8212; is being rolled out too, normalising the Panopticon state so beloved by Mahmood.</p>
<p>Where is all of this leading? The answer is to a new piece of legislation that was hurried through Parliament by the Home Secretary.</p>
<p>The National Security (State Threats) Act gives the state unprecedented powers to proscribe groups, as it did with Palestine Action, but now without having to claim to have evidence of a terrorist threat.</p>
<p><strong>Claiming a &#8216;hostlle&#8217; group</strong><br />
The Home Secretary can make such a designation unilaterally, without any parliamentary oversight, simply because he or she claims the group is a “hostile” foreign state actor that poses a threat to national security or public safety.</p>
<p>Mahmood has already done so with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), effectively Iran’s military.</p>
<p>Further, anyone who works with or receives a “material benefit” &#8212; defined to include “information” &#8212; from a proscribed group can be jailed for up to 14 years. That includes expressing support for the group or sharing information it has provided.</p>
<p>Simply hosting an event where someone expresses support for the group could open one to prosecution, as could posting something on social media that the British state claims is a hostile foreign state “talking point” &#8212; whether or not the information is true.</p>
<p>Once again, this is an assault on the most fundamental of Enlightenment values.</p>
<p>In the National Security Act, it matters only who is passing on the information, not what the information is, or whether it is truthful. There is no public interest defence, such as exposure of criminality by the British state or its allies.</p>
<p>There is no exemption for journalists, lawyers, scholars or human rights groups. It will be impossible for them to do the most essential part of their job: digging out information, testing claims from one side against the other’s, and allowing audiences to determine the truth.</p>
<p><strong>Baring of journalists</strong><br />
Assuming Hamas is declared a hostile foreign actor, as seems all but certain, journalists will be barred from collecting details of Palestinian casualties from Gaza’s Health Ministry or speak to doctors there. Why? Because the Hamas government runs the Health Ministry and hospitals.</p>
<p>Worse, it would be impossible for journalists to visit Gaza to investigate Israeli crimes &#8212; something that will delight Israel &#8212; because such a visit would need to be organised through the Hamas government. To do so would risk 14 years in jail.</p>
<p>The same will be true for reporting from Iran or Russia, if the Home Secretary so decides.</p>
<p>The only apparent carve-out will be for journalists who get approval from the British government beforehand.</p>
<p>That should ensure that only the most compliant, access-driven journalists, belonging to state and billionaire-owned media, will be able to engage with “hostile” foreign actors &#8212; in ways the British state can be sure will best represent its interests.</p>
<p>Under this new law, the search for truth, and potentially the truth itself, will be criminalised.</p>
<p>The National Security Act systematises all the other developments we noted earlier. It gives the state carte blanche to criminalise anyone who scrutinises or challenges its moral or legal authority.</p>
<p><strong>Search for the truth</strong><br />
Who should be in uproar over this monstrous legislative assault on the right to search for truth, to hold the state accountable, to act as a watchdog on the abuse of power?</p>
<p>If the billionaire-owned media did any of the above, news outlets would be leading the pushback. As it is, they are mostly silent &#8212; because they do none of these things.</p>
<p>It will be independent journalists, commentators, lawyers and human rights activists who will be picked off one by one, sending a message to everyone else to keep their heads down.</p>
<p>Starved of real information and critical scrutiny of the British state’s actions, the public, so it is hoped, will become more ignorant, more docile, more passive as their rights are steadily stripped away.</p>
<p>As the climate crisis intensifies, as resource wars accelerate, as austerity at home bites deeper, the finger will be pointed not at the real culprits &#8212; the super-rich, their media and the captured state &#8212; but at earlier victims of the West: those fleeing from the wars we initiated, from an increasingly unstable climate our inflated consumption provoked, and from a paucity of resources following centuries of colonial theft.</p>
<p>While we are encouraged to blame “the immigrants”, or “the Muslims”, or “the left”, or “the Israel haters”, the state is in a race to erect a scaffolding of control to protect itself before we wake up to the deception.</p>
<p>Time is running out on all fronts. The lack of urgency to address these crises is not because the crises don’t exist, but because our passivity has been engineered. The truth is we are already in the Panopticon, and our minds are already deeply fashioned for obedience.</p>
<p><em><span class="css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0"><a href="https://twitter.com/jonathan_k_cook/">Jonathan Cook</a> is a writer, journalist and self-appointed media critic and author of many books about Palestine. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. This article was first published by Middle East Eye and republished from the author’s Substack with permission.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Segal State &#8211; the public office Australia never voted for</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/10/the-segal-state-the-public-office-australia-never-voted-for/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Albanese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antisemitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Labor Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crackdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegitimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jillian Segel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice to Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zionism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jillian Segal holds power over what Australians may say, teach, report and believe. No election gave it to her. No Parliament ratified it. Nothing like her office has existed in the federation. Labor built it. The Coalition wants it bigger. Nobody asked you. Andrew Brown  reports for Michael West Media. Part one. SPECIAL REPORT: By ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Jillian Segal holds power over what Australians may say, teach, report and believe. No election gave it to her. No Parliament ratified it. Nothing like her office has existed in the federation. Labor built it. The Coalition wants it bigger. Nobody asked you. Andrew Brown  reports for <strong>Michael West Media</strong>. Part one.</em></p>
<p><strong>SPECIAL REPORT:</strong> <em>By Andrew Brown</em></p>
<p>Remember the referendum in which Australians voted to create a Voice to Parliament for Israel?</p>
<p>You don’t. It never happened. We got one anyway.</p>
<p>In 2023, 60.06 percent of Australians rejected a constitutionally recognised Voice for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. A body that could make representations only on matters concerning the people whose ancestors have been here 60,000 years.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=Bondi+Royal+Commission"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Reports on the Bondi Royal Commission</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Too much, the No campaign shrieked. Division. Privilege. Special treatment.</p>
<p>Nine months later, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese handed Jillian Segal what the Voice never dreamed of asking for. Not a right to be heard. Power. No election. No parliamentary vote. No hearing.</p>
<p>A three-year commission reporting personally to the Prime Minister, with a mandate reaching into every campus, newsroom, classroom, gallery, charity, arts contract and visa file in the Commonwealth.</p>
<blockquote><p>Australia has never seen an office like this. Not once in 125 years.</p></blockquote>
<p>We have been here before and we said no. In 1951, Robert Menzies asked Australians for power to outlaw communism and police political belief. Even Menzies put it to a referendum, because a democracy does not seize control of ideas by fiat.</p>
<p>A frightened people refused him.</p>
<p>That refusal became a founding settlement of this country. The state does not decide what citizens may think.</p>
<p><strong>A captain’s call<br />
</strong>Albanese tore up that settlement with a press release. No referendum. No bill. No debate. One man appointed one advocate, and the checkpoint went up.</p>
<p>An open society grants authority over its citizens three ways &#8212; election, appointment ratified by Parliament, or a court, ruling in public, subject to appeal.</p>
<p>Segal’s power arrived by none of them. The word for that is illegitimate. Not unlawful. Worse. Lawful, and</p>
<blockquote><p>authorised by nobody but one man.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do not look to the opposition for rescue. The Coalition demanded a national antisemitism crackdown before Labor delivered one, and its only complaint since is that the checkpoint is too small and the universities let off too lightly.</p>
<p>Resistance has come from the crossbench alone. When both major parties agree on machinery this size, the voters have been deleted from the equation. Neither will ask whether Segal’s authority is legitimate, because both intend to use it. That is imposition.</p>
<blockquote><p>That is Australia in 2026.</p></blockquote>
<p>Say it plainly. Antisemitism is real. It is sometimes murderous. Jewish Australians deserve safety, delivered without mercy by police, courts and criminal law against anyone who menaces a synagogue or a schoolchild.</p>
<p>Safety does not require a private advocate enthroned above the speech of 27 million people. That is not protection. That is capture.</p>
<p><strong>The wrong person, chosen on purpose<br />
</strong>Segal ran the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. She chaired the Australia Israel Chamber of Commerce. Israel lobby groups.</p>
<p>Advocacy for Israel is her right as a private citizen. It is also the precise reason no honest government would put her near an office ruling on the boundary between antisemitism and criticism of Israel. Albanese did not blunder into the conflict. He shopped for it.</p>
<p>Her selection sits buried under Freedom of Information redactions. Up to $16.9 million was approved for the Envoy offices. You were not asked. You were not told. You are paying her a reported $1070 a day, and Home Affairs refuses to tell you her salary.</p>
<p><strong>The machinery of a small authoritarian state<br />
</strong>Jillian Segal produced a 20-page plan. Thirteen recommendations. Forty nine actions. And behind them, nothing. No published evidence base. No consultation paper. No regulatory impact statement.</p>
<p>Not one piece of credible research showing any of it would prevent a single antisemitic incident. For all the rigour on display, the plan might as well have been drafted at her Point Piper kitchen table. In December 2025, the government swallowed it whole anyway, named it a programme of work led by Segal, and pledged action on every recommendation, unquestioned.</p>
<p>Read the list and ask which country you are living in. Media monitoring. A university report card. Withholding university funding. Terminating academic grants. Stripping charities of their status. Screening visa applicants for their opinions. Ideological training for the public service. Cancellation clauses so arts grants can be ripped back from artists who say the wrong thing about the wrong state.</p>
<p>The fig leaf is that Segal cannot personally cancel anything. Her office helps define the offence, grades the accused and recommends the sentence.</p>
<p>Ministers supply the muscle and the deniability. Prosecutor, judge and probation service in one unelected body, answerable only to the man who created it. Build this for any other subject and Australians would name it instantly.</p>
<blockquote><p>A censorship ministry.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>A rigged definition, wired into everything</strong><br />
At the centre sits the contested IHRA definition, whose own lead drafter has protested its use as an enforcement weapon. The ABC, SBS, Amnesty International and hundreds of scholars warn its Israel-related examples can melt criticism of a state into hatred of a people. Segal bolts it into government regardless.</p>
<p>From January 2027, universities must define antisemitism under an enforceable national standard. Then Segal’s report card marks whether the definition is appropriate, while her plan demands IHRA everywhere. Choice, the way a loan shark offers choice.</p>
<p>No vice-chancellor will need to be ordered to censor.</p>
<blockquote><p>They will censor themselves in advance.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is only the architecture. Then Segal took an oath and showed what it is for.</p>
<p>And hold one question in your head overnight, the one polite Australia refuses to ask. Why does one form of racism summon a ministry, a report card and $130 million, while First Nations families waited 30 years and 590 deaths in custody for recommendations nobody implemented?</p>
<p>Why machinery for one hatred and a media release for the rest? You are not supposed to ask. Ask anyway.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/12/the-segal-state-2-the-mask-the-children-the-money-and-the-answer/">Part 2: the mask off under oath</a>. </strong>The plan for your children. The $50,000 nobody will investigate. And the question answered.</li>
</ul>
<p><em><a href="https://michaelwest.com.au/author/andrew-brown/"> Andrew Brown</a> is a Sydney businessman in the health products sector, former Deputy Mayor of Mosman and Palestine peace activist. This article was first published by Michael West Media and is republished with permission.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The key Hormuz question that everybody is avoiding</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2026/08/10/the-key-hormuz-question-that-everybody-is-avoiding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decolonisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbas Araghchi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panama Canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic routes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suez Canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western powers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=131816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Special Correspondent When you hear &#8220;Iran&#8221; and &#8220;Strait of Hormuz&#8221; in the same sentence, what comes to mind? Tensions? Threats? Chaos? &#8230;That’s exactly what the MSM news media want you to think with their headlines. READ MORE: Trump says US only ‘semi-negotiating’ with Iran; Israel rejects Gaza plan Oil prices climb as Iranian demands cloud ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Special Correspondent</em></p>
<p>When you hear &#8220;Iran&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strait_of_Hormuz">Strait of Hormuz</a>&#8221; in the same sentence, what comes to mind?</p>
<p>Tensions? Threats? Chaos? &#8230;That’s exactly what the MSM news media want you to think with their headlines.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/8/10/iran-war-live-us-semi-negotiating-with-tehran-israel-rejects-gaza-plan"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Trump says US only ‘semi-negotiating’ with Iran; Israel rejects Gaza plan</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/8/10/oil-prices-climb-as-iranian-demands-cloud-outlook-for-strait-of-hormuz">Oil prices climb as Iranian demands cloud outlook for Strait of Hormuz</a></li>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=War+on+Iran">Other War on Iran reports</a></li>
</ul>
<p>But here’s what they don&#8217;t tell you:</p>
<p>Iran let the world sail through that waterway for free for more than 40 years &#8212; no tolls, no fees. No questions asked.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, other nations have been charging billions from ships using their strategic routes and nobody bats an eye.</p>
<p>So why the sudden outrage against Tehran? And more importantly, what changed?</p>
<p><strong>Cashing in big time</strong><br />
Meanwhile, what about other nations? They’re cashing in big time:</p>
<p>Suez Canal &#8212; billions in fees yearly<br />
Panama Canal &#8212; charges for ships of up to $1 million per passage<br />
Turkish Straits &#8212; toll booths are alive and well</p>
<p>So when Western powers point fingers at Tehran, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has one simple question:</p>
<p>“Why are we the only ones painted as the ‘bad guys’ when we’ve been the most generous?”</p>
<figure id="attachment_131829" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-131829" style="width: 680px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-131829" src="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide.png" alt="Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi" width="680" height="445" srcset="https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide.png 680w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide-300x196.png 300w, https://asiapacificreport.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Abbas-Araghchi-Buez-680wide-642x420.png 642w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-131829" class="wp-caption-text">Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi . . . asking for a fair debate. Image: Bueze</figcaption></figure>
<p>He’s not denying tensions. He’s not dodging responsibility.</p>
<p>He’s just asking for a fair debate, not a one-sided blame game.</p>
<p>Iran didn&#8217;t just wake up one day and decide to flex its muscles.</p>
<p><strong>Weakening a nation</strong><br />
The United States has:</p>
<ul>
<li>Attacked Iran illegally and without justification;</li>
<li>Imposed crippling sanctions;</li>
<li>Sent warships to their doorstep;</li>
<li>Tried to cut off their oil lifeline; and</li>
<li>Worked to shrink Iran&#8217;s influence in the region.</li>
</ul>
<p>When you spend 47 years trying to weaken a nation, don&#8217;t be surprised when they use what they have to push back.</p>
<p>Every sanction, every threat, every military move &#8212; the hostile campaign didn&#8217;t break Iran.</p>
<p>It reminded the country of 93 million people how powerful their position really is.</p>
<p>The Strait of Hormuz isn&#8217;t just water.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s 20 percent of the world&#8217;s oil supply passing through daily (before that US-Israel attack on Iran on February 28). And when you corner a country that controls Hormuz,<br />
it will start charging politically, not just financially.</p>
<p>Iran isn&#8217;t collecting tolls because they want to. They&#8217;re collecting because the US gave them leverage by trying to break them.</p>
<p>If you spent years poking a lion, why are you shocked when it roars and starts charging admission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
