<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TTIP &#8211; Asia Pacific Report</title>
	<atom:link href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/tag/ttip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz</link>
	<description>Independent Asia Pacific news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>&#8216;The biggest protest this country has seen in years&#8217; &#8211; Germans protest trade pact</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2016/02/06/the-biggest-protest-this-country-has-seen-in-years-germans-protest-trade-pact/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trans Pacific Partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=9664</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zero Hedge By Tyler Durdan, a blog commentary written after the anti-TTIP protests in Berlin last October when more than 250,000 people demonstrated. FLASHBACK: When it comes to official and media opinion on President Obama&#8217;s crowning trade &#8220;achievements&#8221;, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership (TTIP), the party line is united. ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/" target="_blank">Zero Hedge</a></p>
<p><em>By Tyler Durdan, a blog commentary written after the anti-TTIP protests in Berlin last October when more than 250,000 people demonstrated.</em></p>
<p>FLASHBACK: When it comes to official and media opinion on President Obama&#8217;s crowning trade &#8220;achievements&#8221;, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership (TTIP), the party line is united.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-06/trans-pacific-partnership-permanently-locking-obama-agenda-40-global-economy">previously noted</a>, Barack Obama has assured the population that this treaty <a title="is going to be wonderful for everyone" href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/10/05/obama-trans-pacific-partnership-canada-japan-australia/73367582/" target="_blank">is going to be wonderful for everyone:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="quote_start"></div>
<div class="quote_end"></div>
<p>In hailing the agreement, Obama said, “Congress and the American people will have months to read every word” before he signs the deal that he described as a win for all sides.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>“If we can get this agreement to my desk, then we can help our businesses sell more Made in America goods and services around the world, and we can help more American workers compete and win,” Obama said.</p></blockquote>
<p>The mainstream media&#8217;s chorus of support for these trade deal is likewise deafening: here are some indicative headlines from this past Monday:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time Magazine: “<a title="Pacific Trade Deal Is Good for the U.S. and Obama’s Legacy" href="http://time.com/4061197/tpp-obama-legacy/" target="_blank">Pacific Trade Deal Is Good for the U.S. and Obama’s Legacy</a>”</li>
<li>The Washington Post: “<a title="The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a trade deal worth celebrating" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-trans-pacific-partnership-is-a-trade-deal-worth-celebrating/2015/10/05/100539c6-6b98-11e5-b31c-d80d62b53e28_story.html" target="_blank">The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a trade deal worth celebrating</a>”</li>
</ul>
<p>The far less popular opposing view, one <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-06/trans-pacific-partnership-permanently-locking-obama-agenda-40-global-economy">repeatedly presented here</a>, is that like with every other &#8220;free trade&#8221; agreement that the US has entered into since World War II, the exact opposite is what will actually happen: the outcome will be that the US trade deficit (which excluding <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2015/10/US%20trade%20ex%20petroleum.jpg">petroleum is already back to record levels</a>) will get even larger, and we will see even more jobs and even more businesses go overseas, thus explaining the secrecy and the fast-track nature of the TPP and TTIP&#8217;s passage through Congress.</p>
<p>And while the US population, which is far more perturbed by what Caitlyn Jenner will wear tomorrow than DC&#8217;s plans on the future of world trade, has been mute in its response to the passage of the first part of the trade treaty, the TPP &#8211; after all the MSM isn&#8217;t there to tell it how to feel about it, aside to assure it that everything will be great even as millions of highly-paid jobs mysteriously become line cooks &#8211; other countries are standing up against globalist trade interests meant to serve a handful of corporations.</p>
<p>Case in point Germany, where today [10 October 2015] hundreds of thousands of people marched in Berlin in protest against the planned &#8220;free trade&#8221; deal between Europe and the United States which they say is anti-democratic and will lower food safety, labor and environmental standards.</p>
<p>TTIP critics fear that it would lead to worse safeguards in Europe, bringing down standards for consumer safety, food and health or labor rights down to those in America.</p>
<p>European nations have stricter regulations for things like genetically modified foods or workers benefits than the US does. There is also discontent with the secretive nature of the negotiations, which prompts sceptics to assume the worst about the document they would eventually produce.</p>
<p>The organisers &#8211; an alliance of environmental groups, charities and opposition parties &#8211; claimed that 250,000 people were taking part in the rally against free trade deals with both the United States and Canada, far more than they had anticipated.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-10/biggest-protest-country-has-seen-years-quarter-million-germans-protest-obama-free-tr" target="_blank">Read the full commentary here</a></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>German judges oppose &#8216;investment courts&#8217; for Europe trade deal</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2016/02/04/german-judges-oppose-investment-courts-for-europe-trade-deal/</link>
					<comments>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2016/02/04/german-judges-oppose-investment-courts-for-europe-trade-deal/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Media Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socio-Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trans Pacific Partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=9542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stop TIPP In a statement, Germany’s largest association of judges and public prosecutors has firmly rejected the European Commission’s  proposal to create an investment court  system in TTIP &#8211; the European equivalent to TPPA being signed today in Auckland. By Felix Heilmann and Friederike Rehn After unprecedented controversy over far-reaching rights for foreign investors in ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="bloginfo"><time><a href="https://stop-ttip.org/" target="_blank">Stop TIPP</a><br />
</time></span></p>
<div class="entry">
<p><em>In a <a href="http://www.drb.de/cms/fileadmin/docs/Stellungnahmen/2016/DRB_160201_Stn_Nr_04_Europaeisches_Investitionsgericht.pdf" target="_blank">statement</a>, Germany’s largest <a href="http://www.drb.de/cms/index.php?id=28" target="_blank">association of judges and public prosecutors</a> has firmly rejected the European Commission’s  proposal to create an investment court  system in TTIP &#8211; the European equivalent to TPPA being signed today in Auckland.<strong><br />
</strong></em></p>
<p><em>By Felix Heilmann and Friederike Rehn</em></p>
<p>After unprecedented controversy over far-reaching rights for foreign investors in the proposed European Union-United States trade deal TTIP – also known as Investor-State-Dispute-Settlement or ISDS – the European Commission had presented a revised proposal for the issue in autumn 2015, allegedly replacing the much-loathed ISDS with an &#8220;Investment Court System&#8221;, or ICS.</p>
<p>The proposal drew heavy criticism from civil society groups rejecting the Commission proposal as a mere re-branding exercise, which would resolve none of the fundamental concerns about granting special privileges for foreign investors, undermining national laws and bypassing domestic courts.</p>
<p>The latest statement released by Germany’s <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Association_of_Judges" target="_blank">largest professional association of judges and public prosecutors</a> echoes these voices and presents a heavy blow to the Commission.</p>
<p>In today’s <a href="http://www.drb.de/cms/fileadmin/docs/Stellungnahmen/2016/DRB_160201_Stn_Nr_04_Europaeisches_Investitionsgericht.pdf" target="_blank">statement</a> the judges and prosecutors call “special courts” for only one group in society “the wrong way” to ensure legal certainty and security. They also raise serious concerns over the independence of the judges in the Commission proposal, ranging from lack of financial independence to unclear selection criteria.</p>
<p>According to the statement, “this makes the ICS not look like an international court, but more like a permanent arbitration tribunal.”</p>
<p>The paper also stresses that there is no need for the establishment of a special court for foreign investors as EU member states provide and guarantee equal access to justice to all litigants, including investors.</p>
<p>The judges also question the competence of the European Union to establish the proposed court system which would not only constrain the EU’s and member states’ legislative powers but fundamentally change the existing court systems within the European Union.</p>
<p>Now that citizens’ concerns have been confirmed the question remains: If legal professionals and citizens reject this idea, whom is the Commission actually serving, if not corporate interests?</p>
<p><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2016/02/03/tpp-out-of-step-with-human-rights-dont-sign-says-un-expert/" target="_blank">TPPA ‘out of step with human rights’</a></p>
<p><a href="http://itsourfuture.org.nz/" target="_blank">TPPA: It’s our future</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2016/02/04/german-judges-oppose-investment-courts-for-europe-trade-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
