<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal opinions &#8211; Asia Pacific Report</title>
	<atom:link href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/tag/legal-opinions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz</link>
	<description>Independent Asia Pacific news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>&#8216;A stain on our country&#8217;: Criticism of &#8216;racist&#8217; Supreme Court rulings</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2024/04/29/a-stain-on-our-country-criticism-of-racist-supreme-court-rulings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[APR editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[American Samoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federated States of Micronesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariana Islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNZ Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Determination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insular Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US legal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=100391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Mark Rabago, RNZ Pacific Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas correspondent The US Department of Justice is being urged to condemn and cease its reliance on the &#8220;Insular Cases&#8221; &#8212; a series of US Supreme Court opinions on US territories, which have been labelled racist. Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin called them &#8220;a stain ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/authors/mark-rabago">Mark Rabago</a>, <a href="https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/">RNZ Pacific</a> Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas correspondent</em></p>
<p>The US Department of Justice is being urged to condemn and cease its reliance on the &#8220;Insular Cases&#8221; &#8212; a series of US Supreme Court opinions on US territories, which have been labelled racist.</p>
<p>Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin called them &#8220;a stain on the history of our country and its highest court&#8221;.</p>
<p>The territories include the Northern Marianas, Guam, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/?s=US+Pacific+territories+law"><strong>READ MORE:</strong> Other US Pacific territories&#8217; law issues</a></li>
</ul>
<p>A letter signed by 43 members of Congress was sent to the Department of Justice this month.</p>
<p>The letter follows a filing by the Justice Department last month, in which it stated that &#8220;aspects of the Insular Cases&#8217; reasoning and rhetoric, which invoke racist stereotypes, are indefensible and repugnant&#8221;.</p>
<p>But the court has yet to reject the doctrine wholly and expressly.</p>
<p>US House of Representatives&#8217; Natural Resources Committee ranking member Raúl M. Grijalva said the Justice Department had made strides in the right direction by criticising &#8220;aspects&#8221; of the Insular Cases.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Reject these racist decisions&#8217;</strong><br />
&#8220;But it is time for DOJ to go further and unequivocally reject these racist decisions; much as it has for other Supreme Court opinions that relied on racist stereotypes that do not abide by the Constitution&#8217;s command of equality and respect for rule of law,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Congresswoman Stacey E. Plaskett said the Justice Department had a crucial opportunity to take the lead in rejecting the Insular Cases.</p>
<p>&#8220;For far too long these decisions have justified a racist and colonial legal framework that has structurally disenfranchised the 3.6 million residents of US territories and denied them equal constitutional rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>Senate Judiciary Committee chair Durbin said the decisions still impact on those who live in US territories to this day.</p>
<p>&#8220;We need to acknowledge that these explicitly racist decisions were wrongly decided, and I encourage the Department of Justice to say so.&#8221;</p>
<p>In recent weeks, Virgin Islands Governor Albert Bryan, Jr and Manuel Quilichini, president of the Colegio de Abogados y Abogadas de Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico Bar Association), have also sent letters to DOJ urging the Department to condemn the Insular Cases.</p>
<p>Quilichini wrote to DOJ earlier this month, and this followed a 2022 resolution by the American Bar Association and similar letters from the Virgin Islands Bar Association and New York State Bar Association to the Justice Department.</p>
<p><i><em>This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.</em></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
