<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Graham Davis: Behind the saga of the &#8216;seized&#8217; Russian super yacht Amadea	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://asiapacificreport.nz/2022/04/26/graham-davis-behind-the-saga-of-the-seized-russian-super-yacht-amadea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2022/04/26/graham-davis-behind-the-saga-of-the-seized-russian-super-yacht-amadea/</link>
	<description>Independent Asia Pacific news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jone dakuvula		</title>
		<link>https://asiapacificreport.nz/2022/04/26/graham-davis-behind-the-saga-of-the-seized-russian-super-yacht-amadea/#comment-19686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jone dakuvula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=73295#comment-19686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When i first read this in the Fiji Sun I had posted to some friends that  Section 11(3) of the decreed 2013  Constitution says &quot;Every person has the right to be secure against unreasonable search of his or her person or property and against unreasonable seizure of his or her property&quot; It seems this provision had been ignored by the lawyers and the Court.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i first read this in the Fiji Sun I had posted to some friends that  Section 11(3) of the decreed 2013  Constitution says &#8220;Every person has the right to be secure against unreasonable search of his or her person or property and against unreasonable seizure of his or her property&#8221; It seems this provision had been ignored by the lawyers and the Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
